USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Faces Drone and Ballistic Missile Attacks in the Red Sea

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 44

  • @James-ov9rh
    @James-ov9rh Год назад +12

    I'm pretty sure "Ike" and crew isn't the least intimidated....I served on this great ship for 6 years of my career.

    • @defensenews1844
      @defensenews1844  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the comment

    • @mikesmith5128
      @mikesmith5128 Год назад +1

      Me too. Deck Dept 1st division. 93 to 97

    • @stephenmccandless5113
      @stephenmccandless5113 Год назад +2

      I was stationed on the USS Blue (DD 744)..We were plane guard for carriers.

    • @MrDeepwatermarine
      @MrDeepwatermarine Год назад +4

      My son is on that ship right now. A gang

    • @شاركالبحري
      @شاركالبحري 9 месяцев назад

      That means he is in danger day and night try to bring him home soon.​@@MrDeepwatermarine

  • @eddieburgett9678
    @eddieburgett9678 Год назад +7

    To the men and women of the United States military thank you so much for all our freedoms and putting yourselves in harms way every day and to see these ships running so smoothly is not a easy task but it's your professional team work makes it real

  • @gnolan4281
    @gnolan4281 Год назад +5

    The defense part makes me proud but where's the ATTACK part?

  • @kevinpackard6518
    @kevinpackard6518 11 месяцев назад

    I was on IKE from 1987 to 1991. ET2 Packard OER division, oe09 Ships Inertial Navigation System, (SINS). I had a lot of fun. There were plenty of times when it was not fun. Going through the Suez Canal for Desert Shield was great. If you were onboard with me look me up.

  • @stevetadych6155
    @stevetadych6155 Год назад +4

    I know a sailor aboard the Ike...he is a True Patriot!!

  • @jeanperreault1638
    @jeanperreault1638 Год назад +5

    Well I think we need to resolve this problem once and for all, they need to stop taking out our handkerchiefs and taking the next step. solve this problem, they only know one way

  • @mirjanakovac3085
    @mirjanakovac3085 10 месяцев назад

    ❤❤❤❤Predivno ❤❤❤

  • @LordBuckhouse
    @LordBuckhouse Год назад +2

    The US military has got to come up with a reliable and inexpensive way to shoot down all these drones. Both at sea or over a battlefield. Using million dollar missiles or even 100,000 missiles is not the way to go. Perhaps lasers.

  • @jurgenschroth9347
    @jurgenschroth9347 Год назад +1

    Dieses Schiff wäre bei mir schon längst dort wo es hingehört auf dem Boden des Meeres !!

  • @poliniques
    @poliniques Год назад

    Funny, there are moments when this video reminds me of the Imperial Fleet from Star Wars. hahaha

  • @volkerneukirchner2796
    @volkerneukirchner2796 Год назад +1

    Um Drohnen abzuwehren benötigt man im Wettbewerb und Wettrüsten wieder exklusive Abwehr Drohnen.Das Problem ist das die Abwehr von Drohnen Ressourcen verschlingt. Ein brilliantes Ordnungssystem und der Einsatz von Drohnen müssen den Verband auf Kurs halten.

  • @theeraphatsunthornwit6266
    @theeraphatsunthornwit6266 Год назад

    If a carrier is sinking, all jet fighter would be like take off take off now now now

  • @ช้อนกากมาก2552

    Hi US I love you

  • @jameshoge1177
    @jameshoge1177 8 месяцев назад

    Several shots of carriers that were not the Ike.

  • @itch4travel
    @itch4travel Год назад +2

    What happens when the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower ran out of anti drone missiles?

  • @Macmayuri
    @Macmayuri Год назад +2

    EDETECT NYO KUNG SAAN NANGGALING ANG DRONE**KUNG SA BANSA NI PEDRO GALING ANG DRONE* ANOPA???TAPUSIN NA NINYO***

  • @yvonneedayan-alejandro4607
    @yvonneedayan-alejandro4607 Год назад

    ✨️🙏🙏🙏🙏💖🙏🙏🙏🙏✨️

  • @francofava8818
    @francofava8818 Год назад +1

    Ótima resposta a esses terroristas

  • @jamespatrick5348
    @jamespatrick5348 Год назад +2

    Not cost effective fighting cheap drones. US should do like the rest of the world and ditch the Red Sea. It's not winnable.

    • @granthendriksz2507
      @granthendriksz2507 Год назад +1

      The US have these fleets floating around. They have defence contractors manufacturing arms 24/7. As apposed to this stuff becoming outdated or redundant they create proxy wars. This props up the share marketplace and strengthens the dollar. Houthis were just a bunch of goat herders a few years back. Macro economics at play. Why aren't sending a fleet into the Black sea?

    • @onegemini420
      @onegemini420 Год назад +9

      You do understand that shipping and global trade are part of what fuels the economy to afford our huge fleets and missiles. You do understand that it is far more cost-effective to launch millions of dollars in ordinance, rather than losing billions in lost trade or longer shipping routes around Africa.
      So actually it IS cost-effective for the US to do this and it is a show of force to deter Iran and others from doing the same because some people like you believe it is not cost-effective.
      The price of a missile is far more than a drone yes. But you really have a narrow field of view if that is the entirety of your argument and you do not see the cost effectiveness of protecting global trade.
      Billions in global trade? Or MIllions in Ordinance to protect it? Hmmm, which is more cost-effective now?

  • @F.A.K.93
    @F.A.K.93 Год назад +1

    Drones & missiles won't get near it. Can't say I saw any heroics or stunning strategy. Maybe I should get my eyes tested.😀

  • @ivank7911
    @ivank7911 7 месяцев назад

    Is it still floating or.at.the bottom.of rhe sea now? Just asking for the houthis😂