weird how skis switched sides at the very end, either a new player who wasn't looking at the numbers or an agent of chaos who just wanted the game to go longer
in this game 90% of the time when you reach that point as crown you get backstabbed by your former allies it was obvious with this guy who was being passive and opportunistic which is why you should break alliances and eliminate players before that happens
@@Notski But corgi was winning, all he had to do was wait. Playing to "win" at that position is picking whoever is winning and peace out, corgi was winning.... then he switched? weird play
At 17:20 Ash had asked for peace.. I think you should had accepted that and send him a second place sign... This could have keep him out for a minute so you can recover from the attack that skistip did
@@AshGamingTalesyou played yourself you already attacked sikerink that was really risky betting on the fact he was going to forgive you and if you’d of attacked him and not Adolf rizzler you could of teamed with him against corgi because he’d of gotten more land from him than if he betrayed you so it was obvious which side he’d of took 😂
I just got this video recommended and it was unexpected to see myself in it. I discovered Territorial around 4-6 weeks ago, so this one is probably one of my first games :) Did the right strategic moves but completely bad on over attacking, didnt know at that time how to attack properly :( Great Game mate!
Hey Corgi, idk if this tactic is actually good but it has worked for me a couple of times. So what you do is, when you're up against multiple players attacking you, but you're way bigger than them, what you should do is save up a lot until you are many millions of troops above your biggest enemy (so for example in this video when you were at 29 million and siker was at 23 ish million) and you attack with a large amount of troops, like 40%, or better yet, just as many as you can spare while still being above the biggest enemy, and you attack one of the weaker enemies, this takes a lot of their land and scares them into not attacking anymore, so in this case you should have attacked ash with like 5.5 million troops when he had like 7-8 million himself, because you have the pixel and interest advantage, you get your troops back pretty fast. So while you temporarily drop to like 24 ish million, you'll be back up to 29 pretty fast, while your enemies are still at around the same troop level.
mathematically speaking If you're against a coalition of players you should attack: 1. overattacking players 2. smaller players that you can eliminate and take most of their land 3. the biggest enemy player (to lower their interest = main troop gain) in this case once you've noticed, that Ash hit red interest again, it would have been best to keep your two big enemies at around similar size to keep their interest income as low as possible
I would like to see you do an "honourable challenge" where you have to stick to your treaties. That means absolutely no attacking while a peacedeal is in place, even if they fullsend someone else. Would you be open to try something like that.
Nice game! I really don't think it will have gone much differently with me either. I suppose in hindsight it was better to keep those two about the same size, but really not a misplay there. You fought great opponents, and lost to a great coalition.
Not a fan of full send - too RNG and makes people hesitate to initiate attacks. I also think people overvalue instant gratification "revenge" on most full sends. Yes a few fullsends can stagnate growth, but I feel like most fullsends are better for the recipient than having to grind someone down. But given the fullsenders are leaving the game they don't deal with repercussions. I wouldn't mind the limit being dropped to 40-50%
Had a guy, allie of mine, win a game with a full send. Enemy guy with the crown voted for peace, and after than my ally full send him, got the crown and voted for peace 😂 So fullsends have a place in this game
at start a fullsend will screw you over because the troop difference among players is small, and everyone is looking to expand into the weakest enemy player. So yes you gotta play it smart, and not be a jerk/bully at start if you can't afford it - otherwise you will get fullsent.
@@CorgiCircus Encourage players that act as buffers to shield so that you have more time. Also, ask your allies and others to attack bc otherwise there doing nothing. Sometimes it might be overstepping a boundary but at least you gave them a task. Sikerink was also in the middle so in theory all three of you (potentially more if earlier could've attacked them. PS: Wow, that's a ramble! Hope it made sense.
Why is [CORGI] so ahead of every other clan? I just found your channel, through the clan tag actually, but you are much smaller than [CG] who is way behind on the leaderboard. Since using your clan tag I have been playing much better and teams matches are easy. It's strange.
NOO WAY I AM CROATIAGONNAWIN OMG btw i fullsended bcs they both betrayed me and when i was 1st they were like on 1 m i was on 6 and i didnt kill them and they gamged up on me
The white player fullsending kind of ruined my strategy. The intial plan was to knock off ash and make him boat back but he was over attacking and I had a chance before the third player joined in
I really like watching these videos but I get really upset constantly seeing the horribly racist, xenophobic and insensitive troll names. Please Corgi. Please change your settings like CG Plays does so the names don't appear. It's obviously not your fault, but it's really sad. Ggs
Nah... Fairly certain the best policy is avoiding 2nd place getting too close to you as they hit harder and suffer less losses when you eventually hit back. So CC let Sik get too big. Was fine getting into Scandinavia, but as soon as Ash was down to near 100k pixels, should have switched target to 2nd place.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
weird how skis switched sides at the very end, either a new player who wasn't looking at the numbers or an agent of chaos who just wanted the game to go longer
in this game 90% of the time when you reach that point as crown you get backstabbed by your former allies
it was obvious with this guy who was being passive and opportunistic
which is why you should break alliances and eliminate players before that happens
He played to win. He had a chance if Ash was to betray sik after corgi was out. Not a weird play at all, really the only play he had.
@@Notski But corgi was winning, all he had to do was wait. Playing to "win" at that position is picking whoever is winning and peace out, corgi was winning.... then he switched? weird play
@@behavior2836 no. Second place is not a win.
Going for second place is fine, I've done it plenty of times but it's not a win.
@@behavior2836 and you didn't address my point that I'm sure he was hoping that Ash was gonna betray sik
At 17:20 Ash had asked for peace.. I think you should had accepted that and send him a second place sign... This could have keep him out for a minute so you can recover from the attack that skistip did
Ya that could of worked I felt like he wanted that just to save up and then start up attacking but in hindsight it was worth the risk
I did ask for peace at some point, when I realised I cant play for 1st no more, and wanted to switch sides or at least get 2nd :)
@@AshGamingTalesyou played yourself you already attacked sikerink that was really risky betting on the fact he was going to forgive you and if you’d of attacked him and not Adolf rizzler you could of teamed with him against corgi because he’d of gotten more land from him than if he betrayed you so it was obvious which side he’d of took 😂
I appreciate you showing losses too.
I felt it was an interesting game
I just got this video recommended and it was unexpected to see myself in it.
I discovered Territorial around 4-6 weeks ago, so this one is probably one of my first games :)
Did the right strategic moves but completely bad on over attacking, didnt know at that time how to attack properly :(
Great Game mate!
I like how Skistip kinda just sat there with popcorn and watched Europe explode.
I misplayed it so he could lol
Hey Corgi, idk if this tactic is actually good but it has worked for me a couple of times. So what you do is, when you're up against multiple players attacking you, but you're way bigger than them, what you should do is save up a lot until you are many millions of troops above your biggest enemy (so for example in this video when you were at 29 million and siker was at 23 ish million) and you attack with a large amount of troops, like 40%, or better yet, just as many as you can spare while still being above the biggest enemy, and you attack one of the weaker enemies, this takes a lot of their land and scares them into not attacking anymore, so in this case you should have attacked ash with like 5.5 million troops when he had like 7-8 million himself, because you have the pixel and interest advantage, you get your troops back pretty fast. So while you temporarily drop to like 24 ish million, you'll be back up to 29 pretty fast, while your enemies are still at around the same troop level.
mathematically speaking If you're against a coalition of players you should attack:
1. overattacking players
2. smaller players that you can eliminate and take most of their land
3. the biggest enemy player (to lower their interest = main troop gain)
in this case once you've noticed, that Ash hit red interest again, it would have been best to keep your two big enemies at around similar size to keep their interest income as low as possible
The problem in the scenario wasnt that I attacked one over the other its was the third player attacking me that made the numbers just not work out
how do you tell if they are at red interest or not
ash wasnt a problem there and in fact a benefit due to the fact he just excessively attacked and got himself almost killed
Of course corgi the Viking can overcome enemies
lol
I would like to see you do an "honourable challenge" where you have to stick to your treaties. That means absolutely no attacking while a peacedeal is in place, even if they fullsend someone else. Would you be open to try something like that.
That could be fun ill do that
week 1, day 1 of reminding him to take a sip of water
Week 1, day 1 taking a sip of water when seeing this reminder.
Day 1 of reminding you to take a sip of water
Day 3 of liking this comment.
hurray
Brothers welcome back to corgi posting another banger
welcome back
Was that the real CG in the first part of the game (the one who remained in Greek islands I guess)?
probably not
Would you ever consider doing a challenge video? Like botching up your opening
I will down the road
Nice game! I really don't think it will have gone much differently with me either. I suppose in hindsight it was better to keep those two about the same size, but really not a misplay there. You fought great opponents, and lost to a great coalition.
Not a fan of full send - too RNG and makes people hesitate to initiate attacks. I also think people overvalue instant gratification "revenge" on most full sends. Yes a few fullsends can stagnate growth, but I feel like most fullsends are better for the recipient than having to grind someone down. But given the fullsenders are leaving the game they don't deal with repercussions. I wouldn't mind the limit being dropped to 40-50%
Had a guy, allie of mine, win a game with a full send. Enemy guy with the crown voted for peace, and after than my ally full send him, got the crown and voted for peace 😂
So fullsends have a place in this game
at start a fullsend will screw you over because the troop difference among players is small, and everyone is looking to expand into the weakest enemy player. So yes you gotta play it smart, and not be a jerk/bully at start if you can't afford it - otherwise you will get fullsent.
@@Русские_вперед you can do that without fullsends but it is much harder but I did manage to do it once
I would agree with this
how are they better for the recipient, when one gets full sent they usually be grouped down, so full sends arent really helpful
he can overcome this territorial
mission failed
What if you continued attacking Sikerink bc the general strat is to take down the second biggest, right?
2nd biggest was ash and initially the thought was to make him boat over but then I saw how much he was overattacking
@@CorgiCircus Encourage players that act as buffers to shield so that you have more time. Also, ask your allies and others to attack bc otherwise there doing nothing. Sometimes it might be overstepping a boundary but at least you gave them a task. Sikerink was also in the middle so in theory all three of you (potentially more if earlier could've attacked them.
PS: Wow, that's a ramble! Hope it made sense.
Dead comments
Why is [CORGI] so ahead of every other clan? I just found your channel, through the clan tag actually, but you are much smaller than [CG] who is way behind on the leaderboard. Since using your clan tag I have been playing much better and teams matches are easy. It's strange.
CG really doesnt have a clan just a loose following on fans where I kind of lean more into it to interact with fans
NOO WAY I AM CROATIAGONNAWIN OMG btw i fullsended bcs they both betrayed me and when i was 1st they were like on 1 m i was on 6 and i didnt kill them and they gamged up on me
oh man lol you were in a tough spot but gg's!
Kind of annoyed you didn't just commit to one opponent and take it out. Feel like that might have resulted in a win. Not guaranteed but possible.
The white player fullsending kind of ruined my strategy. The intial plan was to knock off ash and make him boat back but he was over attacking and I had a chance before the third player joined in
Wow what a game
it was!
phew! That was rough!
almost had it!
First comment! Luv ur vids❤
You weren't first comment...
@@OS_master61 then who? Explain
@@dtxuan5993 Zlayer888.
Yay! Thank you!
😊hi corgi!
hello!
hiay
hello!
Sorry it was me idk its u 😊
hey play to win brother!
thirrrrrrrdddd!!!
legend
a
I really like watching these videos but I get really upset constantly seeing the horribly racist, xenophobic and insensitive troll names.
Please Corgi. Please change your settings like CG Plays does so the names don't appear. It's obviously not your fault, but it's really sad. Ggs
I understand where your coming from and do cut some games completely but players with bad names always get ganged up on and lose
u lost it by wrong tactics
true I should have attacked the player in turkey earlier but easier to see in hindsight
What would you have done?
You should've taken down ash first, you would get 40k more pixels and would be over 50%, and that would be impossible for them to win 😢
Nah... Fairly certain the best policy is avoiding 2nd place getting too close to you as they hit harder and suffer less losses when you eventually hit back. So CC let Sik get too big. Was fine getting into Scandinavia, but as soon as Ash was down to near 100k pixels, should have switched target to 2nd place.
My strategy got messed up by the white player fullsending
Naah, that wouldn't have worked. It would have taken 10-20 more seconds from 17:40, and Skizz was WAY too close.