The dirty "Net Zero" carbon myth (that everyone believes)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 июн 2024
- ✉️ OUR NEWSLETTER: www.abundantia.co/
📚 OUR COURSE/MEMBERSHIP: jointheorder.co/
🎫 JOIN OUR CHANNEL (get perks): bit.ly/3e1Mhso
This is why Net Zero is a scam. One that is not only basically believed by the whole world, but one that is running our nations, and being bought and paid for by your tax dollars.
You've definitely heard of "Net Zero" before. It was first popularised during the Paris Climate Agreement in 2016, hosted by the United Nations. And while they likely have the best interests of our planet at heart, there are of course massive entities (especially the world's oil companies) who are taking advantage of Net Zero. Mostly, so they can make lots and lots of money.
The worst thing is, one of the solutions being heralded as our best choice for achieving these goals is carbon capture and storage. Which isn't basically doing anything at all. And is being use to make billions in extra dollars for oil companies.
Let me know your thoughts below.
0:00 - Why Net Zero
1:02 - Where "Net Zero" actually came for
2:16 - How oil companies lie about Net Zero
3:38 - Carbon capture isn't what we were promised
6:38 - Why oil companies really like CCS technology
8:28 - Net Zero is just misdirection
10:23 - Some final thoughts
► IMPORTANT LINKS:
Enter your email below for free weekly lessons and insights into becoming financially free, investing, global tax and corporate structures, passports, residencies, and more.
www.abundantia.co/
► SOCIAL MEDIA:
• Abundantia Instagram: @abundantia.co / abundantia.co
• Sorelle's Instagram: @sorelleamore / sorelleamore
• Leon's Instagram: @leonhill / leonhill
• Abundantia Twitter: / abundantiaco
• Abundantia Facebook: / abundantiafinance
Sorelle and Leon.
Founders, Abundantia
Liability Disclaimer: www.abundantia.co/disclaimer
*We may earn a commission if you buy any products or services via the links in this video's description. This video is not investment, financial, or legal advice. It may be incorrect, outdated, inaccurate, or reflect personal opinions. This video is for entertainment purposes only.
#NetZero #Carbon #CarbonCapture
Do you believe "Net Zero" is mostly for our greater good?
✉ OUR NEWSLETTER: www.abundantia.co/
📚 OUR COURSE/MEMBERSHIP: jointheorder.co/
No way, it's all just wealth transference... 😢
No government speaks for or represents me.
No and I never did have been calling out the liars charlatans and scammers since 05
Net Zero is just propaganda. CO(2) is necessary for life on earth, because without it (150 ppm +) plants die. Without plants we die.
In truth, there is no climate crisis. It's a scam mostly by politicians and socialusts.
No
We have carbon capture devices in Canada. Billions of them. They're called trees.
shhh - that's a conspiracy theory 🤣😂
Oceans work even better.
@@marktimmer2212
So long you keep Monsanto products down to a minimum..!
🍺❤🤙
👉😷💉
🌳🍏🐍
Have you been talking to the weed people again who says that grass absorbs carbon.
LOLOLOLOL
Awesome comment! Simple, concise and accurate.
As someone who's devoted his career to making a part of our human environment (buildings) more energy efficient, actually reducing GHG emissions, AND finding cost-effective ways to make it happen, this mega-scale fraud really burns me up (no pun intended). What I & my colleagues do feels like a drop in the bucket against what these corporate psychopaths do on an everyday basis.
I'm sure it feels that way, but thats why its even more important that people like you are doing the right thing!
I just wish more people could hear this, I'm a passionate environmentalist who is deeply alarmed about what is being implemented in the guise of climate change prevention. Considerable evidence (like this) is showing it is just another wealth transfer and deterioration of our human rights and freedoms. When I bring up my concerns people question my integrity and shout me down. I just hope this information gets out before too much damage is done.
I'm in the same position as you. Very much environmentalist ecologist and aware of all the poblems, but also aware of how corrupt it all has become cos of arseholes. So now the public think it's all bollox and there is no solution out of it now. Stuck between rock band a hard place.
I'm also environmentalist that virtue signals on their smartphone in a rich Western Country with a full belly of food. I am also super self aware.
@@Picklemedia I'm not in a rich western country and I am hungry as hell tight now. So who were you referring to?
@@willthomson8863 good question. I would say specifically anyone agreeing to the content of this video that puts forward the idea that oil is dirty, and therefore bad; while simultaneously reaping the benefits of the energy abundance that pulled them out of abject poverty over the last century.
If you are not calling for energy (oil) austerity from a position of privilege I am not referring to you.
The economy is a derivative of energy.
Oil accounts for most of our energy.
Anyone in an economic position to complain about environmental issues on their cell phone is hypocritical or ignorant if you ask me.
For the record: I am certainly wealthy by global standards, especially by historical standards. I could move to the bush and use solar but that would still make me a hypocrite since the rare earth minerals were likely mined by a starving child in a poor country, and the economic position I would be into make that transition came directly from the benefit of using oil as energy.
That might make me feel better but it does NOT solve anything.
I want energy abundance. That means expanding fracking and natural gas.
I want the world's most poor to have the same _opportunities_ I have had.
I want the two billion minds that are currently offline right now to help work on the problem of sustainability.
Calling oil dirty is a death sentence for millions and I'm not okay with that.
Do you think we should stop oil production?
Was I talking about you?
Do you understand that trees and plants live on CO2 and emit oxygen? We in Canada have a huge forest inventory so you are welcome:). Plant a tree, my friend! Greenhouses actually pump in CO2 to encourage plant growth, check it out. We need plants and trees to live.
Bjorn Lomborg wrote a book called "false alarm" which is a very interesting approach to this climate scam.
I wish this lady would investigate that since her climate emergency hysteria is virtually a death sentence for Millions
Carbon capture won't be an option without leaps in technology.
Oddly enough, reforestation isn't on the table for solving our environmental problems. Oddly enough, using hemp for paper and other materials isn't on the table. Oddly enough, addressing human trafficking isn't on the table. Oddly enough, limiting war isn't on the table. Oddly enough.
That's Very Odd !!!
You can't make money by reforestation, so why bother? Its all about money in the end...
@@manmeetsingh3024 you can because at some point you will get permission to “clean” it
@@manmeetsingh3024 REgrowth is how much of the "wood" industry exists/makes money?
My trust in corporate integrity no longer exists. I will only eat what is fresh and whole because all else is suspect. The entire corporate production system is destroying the health of our ecosystems at an alarming rate. The day of reckoning is upon us... Thank you for your clear and brief presentations, always uniquely informative...
National, multi-national, global corporations just like larger/remote governing bodies are less trust worthy, as opposed to "locals"
GMO and Creutzfeldt-jakob/prion disease says otherwise...
True
Well the mission of corporations is to make money, full stop. It was the job of government to keep them in check, the problem is when they corrupt governments.
unless your growing it, farming, hunting, fishing or foraging it for yourself its all coming at a cost and not just a financial one !!
For me this whole carbon thing means absolutely nothing in my everyday life. I just live my life and enjoy the show. :)
Follow the money = solid plan - you are smart and lovely - speak beautifully and give a proper reality check. THANK YOU
Carbon makes up only 0.04% of the atmosphere. Volcano's are the biggest contributors, but fortunately plants love carbon. I don't know why we even worry about carbon.
Well put. I totally agree. Go plant a tree, it will love the extra Co2
Well said.
Living up here in Canada's Texas through the 80's, I learned long ago that there is a huge difference between promotion and reality. All thanks to the lies I've heard from the oil companies over the decades.
What lies? Did the oil companies tell you that you're destroying the environment with their products?
May I ask what kind of lies?
@@indexrule2k When an oil company talks, they're lying
@@RedLeader327 and can you give me a concrete example?
Canada's Texas?
U do an amazing job researching and communicating.
Feels like a wave of info that is overwhelming at times. The pace is frantic.
FYI: TOTAL is not pronounced ‘total’ but “toe-taaall”
Keep it up!!!
I knew this whole Net Zero stuff was a scam, but i never knew exactly how it does work! Thank you for explaning so elegantly to us simple mortals, ms. Sorelle!
If you want to know how this works, go somewhere else. She didnt explain anything. If you want to know what needs to happen look at the reports from the IEA and their 2050 net zero roadmap which basically models what needs to happen and what the current status of the net zero transition is.
This video does not inform, this is just meant to create clicks.
Credit to Sorelle. A lot of people who are financially independent wouldn't care enough to spend their time informing others 🇮🇸🇦🇺🇺🇸
Just trying to do my best!
100% agreed, she is great
But she also is financially independent cuz one of her main jobs has being informing others. Let's not sanctify people, that's exactly the wrong behavior. Don't get me wrong, I love her videos and they're getting better everyday.
Thank you for caring ✌🏻
@@Cecil_Augus it’s called smart & savvy
I’m independent too. Smart
The company that I used to work for is going net zero. They had a young guy writing a report for the CEO and he was spruiking it. He can up to tell me about it.
Me: You will achieve this by carbon offsets
Him: Yes
Me: So what are in this offsets?
Him: LED lights predominantly
Me: But that doesn’t actually offset anything, it slows the rate of change
Him: What do you think should be the offsets
Me: Paying farmers to increase the carbon content of their soil by growing carbon absorbing plants. Plant more trees
Him: That is too difficult to explain
My conclusion from then on is that the whole carbon offsets and net zero is a scam and inhabited by grifters.
Absolutely, They want to baffle you with Bullshit, and hope you swallow it, but in the end they are just lying to you. They have NO Idea.
It's bad science being fed to dumb people who think they're smart.
There's no rigor, they pick and choose when to include the carbon footprints in their solutions to satisfy their desired "scientific" outcomes.
It comes down to the belief that science is a debate that can be settled, then no longer challenged after you're convinced. That would be so convenient.
Where I work.
The management is only interested in recycling of there's tax rebate in it...
Greenwash....
The whole business community saw people freaking out about climate change and saw a profit opportunity. Profiting from Tesla, and I'll probably buy oil/natty gas stocks with 20% yields because pensions sold to be "green". The investor class tricked pensions and the public to go green so we could not only push our new green companies, but also, buy other companies on the cheap.
Hoping they can stop driving their private Jets and eat each meal grasshoppers before they go giving out advice to us anymore
Not only is your channel extremely informative and eye opening, but your voice is very relaxing and easy to stay focused on. Got a subscriber!
📩📩📩
You guys should do a video on Nuclear Power. It's apparently actually the best way right now to get clean energy with the lowest carbon emissions and the lowest environmental damage done in the long run. Especially if you take a deep dive on how waste from nuclear power plants is actually properly disposed, what the material looks like, and how the media has demonized nuclear power's image to the rest of the entire world. Kyle Hill also did videos about this topic, but I would be interested in watching your take on this matter.
Look at the waste water from Fukashima now being dumped in the Pacific, the current situation in Ukraine where one errant missile could make much of Europe uninhabitable. True they're built with incredible back up protection systems but they're still really dangerous if someone forgot to plan for a big wave (Fukashima), human stupidity (Chernobyl), a war zone (Ukraine).
Humans aren't responsible enough to have nuclear power
This is very similar to the 'green' push for biomass electricity production in the US- which was a major driver for complete deforestation. Amazing how lumber prices spiked almost immediately thereafter.
And a few questionable forest 🔥🤔
There exists a very simply and efficient "machine" that captures CO2 from the atmosphere and binds it in a solid material and has a very convenient byproduct called O2. We call them trees.🙂 Instead of reasing expensive CO2 capturing factories, they'd better invest in real green solutions and plant a couple of billion trees.
they don't need to plant more trees. the world has been greening already and there is a reason for it: increasing CO2 levels!
@@boxsterbenz4059 the real problem is species extinction. Monoculture.
Exactly 🎯 🌳 🌳 🌳 🌳
@@boxsterbenz4059 Co2 the gas of life as it's been called.
And they look after themselves, so there is no "on-going" costs. So when are we going to STOP companies from knocking down acres of trees so that they can build another 20 houses or another University building (like the one near my home where a company knocked down about 200 trees to build another building at the University) in my opinion, that is BS because they could have built it somewhere else.
Interesting take. I am an engineer for a large oil company. I can assure you the net zero initiatives are not money making endeavors for us. I can also assure you we the individuals who work at these companies take these initiatives very seriously and are working hard to come up with net zero technologies that will decrease our carbon footprint. Unfortunately the technology has not caught up with the time pledges by leadership at this point which is why so much money is being invested into boondoggle projects like carbon capture. You are correct in saying we will continue to make our profits on the extraction of oil & gas. Energy is the economy. There is a direct correlation between the amount of oil & gas a country uses and its standard of living. The more energy a country consumes the greater its standard of living. If we truly wanted to transition to greener energy we would want to produce more O&G now to allow for the production and development of greener technologies using the cheap and abundant resource the economies currently run on. I would challenge you to follow the money for your next video. Who gains power and control by pushing an ever changing an ever more dangerous climate? Who determines what constitutes a dangerous and changing environment? Where does their funding or grants come from? It may lead to some uncomfortable realities but its always good to look at both sides of the conversation which is why I took the time to watch your video. Looking forward to your next one.
Buddy - these are grand words indeed. I'm a builder now but graduated as a Mech Eng - so believe I am academical reasonably bright - but what I do have is high levels of critical thinking. If you took some time to watch pretty much any Tom Nelson's podcasts on RUclips you might learn something. She says follow the money. She is 100% right
Love this new direction you took your youtube! This channel is amazing and the info so interesting. Love it and look forward to every video.😃😃
Mark Cartney was supposed to be the most prepared man in economics in Canada. His comment mentioned here, and his recommendation to stop Canada from growing crops to import everything from 3rd world countries, to dedícate a whole country to production of other goods and services, shows how blindsided a proud-prepared-human-being can become.
I hope the crisis that Europe is living, depending almost absolutely on a single gas supplier, shows him that every single country has to try to achieve a balance in all parts of its economy. You just do not shut close a door believing the rest of the world will always be on their knees to supply you.
Not even the apparent most prepared one is able to accurately say something, so obvius to people with common sense.
Or is he just giving the speeches according to who pays him, for over the ethics he once I believed studied.
He flows with the money...just follow the money trail.
So, as we capture all this carbon, what happens to the trees that already do this for us. There is a direct correlation between plant life flourishing and high levels of carbon. They literally filter the air for us. Seems like they want to take over the tree’s utlility so they can make MORE money
Happens nothing with the trees 91% of all trees on the planet are wood farms.
@@robertagren9360 thats just false
@@wtice4632
That's a lie since your comment lacks a foundation. It happens nothing to the trees. we just plant new trees to replace the old
@@robertagren9360 91% trees might be earmarked for destruction, but they arent 'wood farms'... typically rapid deforestation is driven by agriculture - often destructive agriculture like date palm or soy etc
@@brendoncahill6409
They're no longer woods and agricultural land so what's the point saying that we should stop growing wheat, potato, corn, tomatoes and lettuce because we're worried about trees who are no longer there and any planted trees becomes wood farms. They're no normal woods. They're planted woods.
One main threat coming from BP, Shell is Hydrogen production. They have the money, the power and the lobby size to push hydrogen as a "green fuel". However the process the oil companies use to make hydrogen from natural gas, is more polluting than burning the gas in the first place.
What a great channel.
No crazy, surprised thumbnail photos, no hyperbolic presentation to diminish the subject matter.
Those things are paramount in being able to share it with people who buy into the bulls--t and consider anyone with a question a conspiracy theorist.
Thank you.
Fifth lol. Imagine being in a state that tells you not to charge your electric vehicles after they banned petroleum vehicles. It has happened already
Hahaha... definitely not first.
CALIFORNIA!
and turn your a/c up to 78 degrees while Gavin is wearing a sweater during a heat wave because his home and office is probably a cool 68 degrees.
I can't say I'm surprised, I used to work for a health insurance company that talked a lot about how much it cares about people. Predictably customers and employees were treated like last weeks trash. The louder the virtue signal the greater the sin.
There was a tornado in Barrie last year. Many homes were badly damaged. It has taken over a year to see any of them repaired. I know first hand how these insurance
did everything they could to delay paying out any $$$$. Insurance industry= dirt
Amazing work Sorelle… Love the snuck-in TJM shot too. Please continue to expose these evil misanthropic companies!
Thank you very much Sorelle and team.
Precious information, everytime.
As always Sorelle, you tell it the way it is.
Unfortunately everything is a lie and we the public are being conned.
Not everything. But a lot.
Everything cannot be a lie, because lies on a grand scale must have some truth behind them, however minute.
But I'd say we're about as close as we can get to the maximum falsehood threshold
@@Clare-tea A half truth isn't THE truth, but it's also not a complete lie. That's not really what I'm saying though. Most Big Lies are built upon an element of truth. That's how they suck people in in the beginning.
I have watched several of your videos. I complement how you carry yourself. Your smile is infectious. Your presentations are powerful. Thank you for sharing your research with the world. I and many others are grateful.
Wow, thank you!
Greenhouse effect... During the eclipse the temp dropped 5-20°C in 20-30mins, where did the greenhouse go??
This is a great breakdown of what's up. I loved your nod to The Juice Media who did the hilarious (and tragic) Honest Government Ad on the carbon capture and storage farce here in Australia. Can I share the link to it here?
I see the "net zero" thing as another metaphor for *owning nothing and being happy about it.*
I mean... does it really take the turn of one generation to turn a lie into truth?
Klaus does talk a lot about Net Zero.
YES - when the public has been "dumbed-down" and will believe anything it hears on "The Nightly News".
Or a "Communist Paradise." It's another dead end ideology.
Exactly this. Producing carbon, eating meat, living in a house (not a small apartment or pod), driving your own car, going on trips ect... is all indicative of middle class living. We are being made into peasants again and just going along with it out of fear of environmental armageddon. When the elites gather in their private jets or cruise on their yachts, they clearly don't feel the fear that they try to instill in us. It angers and frustrates me that we as a mass or so patient and gullible.
I'm an environmental scientist, working in air quality, and all this clean and green is phooey. People tend to forget that all these emissions are a percentage of 1%, and that it's incredibly selfish to think that humans are the driving cause of any climate changes.
Yes, during the initial industrial revolution, it was really bad. We haven't done that again.
1. Was ozone holes and cfc also a scam?
2. This one always bugs me: why are environmental bodies are against farming and planting? If we plant more vegetations and breed more animals, shouldn't that actually be good for the biospheric environment?
@@JohnJaneson2449 CFCs aren't good and should be disposed of properly, but the ozone is constantly morphing, breaking, and reforming. The hole fixed itself, and will break and fix again eternally.
Many of the atmospheric issues now are things that we just know how to identify, not something new
@@JohnJaneson2449 nope. Cfc destroy and massive amount of ozone. This carbon crap is a scam. Makes no sense and is just weaponized against the people.
Finally someone speaking intelligence. Thank you.
As always great work. As always actions speak loader than words. This to these people’s/companies words, but make sure they are congruent with their actions!
Great show, love the good work....
Thank you...
I find it disengious to only blame the oil companies for this. These companies could not get away with it OR the taxpayer funds for these plants without buy in from the politicians.
They’re all cut from the same shitty cloth haha
I love the oil industry and I will keep supporting it.
Black rock and vanguard and WEF, all these green ideas are taking taxes for breathing
Without the products the oil companies sell us, we die literally.
In 1911, when the earths population was a fraction of what it is today and Co2 levels were low, 40,000 Frenchman died from a brutal heat wave. If this happened today, climate alarmists would lose their minds.
Fossil fuels are a life saving miracle. There is no arguing this fact. The discovery of oil saved the whales from being hunted to extinction for their oil.
The demonization of fossil fuels is simply a money making scheme to transfer wealth to the elite.
@@dickgrayson4325 First name checks out.
Increased CO2 is beneficial from a plant production (food production) standpoint, requiring less additional nitrogen to produce a given quantity. Higher C02 levels has also increased the greening of the earth, more green plants growing in less fertile areas of the world.
Dr. Patrick Moore has some excellent explanations about how this happens if anyone is curious. Check out his books or videos here.
That's right the world is in a very low state of C02 at the moment..go back 100 million years and the levels were very high
Another absolutely clueless internet expert. Plants breath in Co2. It's not food. For higher concentrations of Co2 to benefit plants, they also need more food (fert) and water. It's like you think you know something, and just shit it out revealing how fucking clueless you are. Higher Co2 levels will create environmental conditions that plants evolved away from before humans were even here.
@@gary122 ya, that's how humans, and the plants we rely on, evolved. From higher concentrations of Co2 and higher temps....Human weren't around a hundred million years ago einstein.
Lol like anybody would believe somebody who can't even spell CO2 right; only the first time
How can you go green by building these new giant factories? "Green" is becoming an ugly metaphor, deprived of its original meaning.
I blame the oil company less than the politicians. Politicians “well give you money to save the planet”. Oil co “we’ll candy coat what you do to get your free money”
If the politicians were responsible and honest they’d let taxpayers keep their money
Another industry claiming to be working towards net zero - telecommunications. There's one company that brags that it is the leader in net zero emissions because it is investing in low emission fleet vehicles. Yet, it refuses to allow it's office workers to be remote workers. The workers must transport themselves to a central office. Wouldn't it be smarter to encourage telecommuting to help the environment and grow their own company?
Of course it would, but that's the thing. They don't actually care about the environment. It's just marketing and money
@@LuisC7 The reality is that workers who work remotely or from home are far less productive. Productivity equals money. You're right, they could care less about the environment.
Yes it would. If govts were serious they would provide tax breaks for Tele workers. But there are entire industry's dedicated to building office space so the plebs can spend wealth driving to work.
Probably, depends on their commute I guess, if they bike to work, don’t run their ac while away from home, and the central office makes it’s own electricity via solar panels, but that’s not realistic to assume so much perfect scenarios
@@truckguy6.7 Any statistics for the assumption that workers are less productive working from home?
4:26 about the 4,9M of CO2.. Wouldn't it be better just to plant more trees instead of investing in technology to collect the CO2?
I mean., we been told that trees collect CO2 (food) and transformed it into just Oxygen, right?
So the issue is deforestation.. So.. more Trees, less CO2.. Awesome video as usual!
I think the issue is much more complex than just planting trees. Yes, that will help, but reduction is also needed. Personally, I think we need to do a lot. But as usual, seems like oil companies have hijacked something with good intentions to make money.
Compared to the start of the industrial revolution, we've put 4000 times as much Carbon into the atmosphere AND deforested. To solve it with trees, you'd need many hundreds or even thousands of times the landmass of Earth to plant them on.
Trees are great for some absorption and storage but they do die and then rot, releasing carbon again.
The problem is that we took stuff out of the Earth that collected over tens to hundreds of millions of years, that was trapped, and then released it over a couple of hundred years. So it's all additional stuff that the environment wasn't already dealing with.
We really do need to have actual carbon capturing technology so the carbon can be collected and also stored.
Planting trees is practical and therefore anathema to Governments and corporations.
What is needed is exactly what you are doing. Sharing the truth of what is REALLY going on behind their fake concern for our planet. These groups and individuals need to be outed. Named and shamed. Only a matter of time now.👍
Just a reminder that the same people who gave us the wildly inaccurate models predicting CXV1D was going to end civilization are the same folks trying to predict the future of climate change...
Great video Sorelle, I never have believed in Net 0 (NOT 0). Follow the money!!
Exactly!
Johannesburg South Africa is one of the world’s biggest manmade forests. Our ancestors replaced the African savanna not only with concrete and asphalt, but also with a shedload trees to assuage the heat and vehicle pollution.
You videos are absolutely amazing at waking some people up. Unfortunately some are just way too deep in sleep. I completely support what you're doing here. Please keep it up. You've are a big help & inspiration. 🇺🇸
They are asleep, and they don't know anything about anything because all they watch is pop music videos and reality TV. Just let them sleep.
@@russellmanweller6694 so right you are. At 1st I used to feel sorry for them. But I've showed ppl things, explained it, & so on. They just keep on chuggin the Kool Aid. Even after all of the so called conspiracy theories are shown on the brain melting screen news as conspiracy facts. And exactly the same way they were always. So after years you just have to stop feeling sorry for mindless idiots.
Such amazing content... Love the knowledge Sorelle shares, its concise, layman's terms, and no BS. Such a full rounded analysis of truth that allows people to do their own research and due dilligence... Where has this woman been for 20 years.
❤️
She was probably in high school.
@@dickgrayson4325 lol
I share her with friends because she is so good at explaining things where everyone can understand, and just the facts!
Love your channel! I worked for a huge multinational that was incorporating Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) into their "decision making" (or at least their public image). Problem was, they had components in their systems that they assigned zero or even negative input values and this was absolutely absurd. They were utilizing byproducts of one process as negative contributors to another, to help wipe out overall contributions. Of course, none of this was stated explicitly, but I could not explain the companies LCA to anyone while maintaining a straight face. The long and short of it is that I don't think anyone ever expects mankind to save itself. We've been such poor stewards of the planet for so long, we could never expect the wealthy nations of the world to reduce their "living standards" to insure the future of the species. I fear for our children.
Actually the average family isn’t responsible for the majority of pollution- massive corrupt corporations are.
@@melmorrison1400 The average single family home in the US has increased from 507 sq ft per person to 971 sq ft per person in 2015. McMansions are NOT the purview of corupt corporations, but that of opulent Americans.
@@Drpermer I don't know about you, but where I live in California people are squeezing into small apartments or houses because they can't afford it here. In no way do we have over 900 square feet per person.
@@Cyndogg085 Certainly, there are those living at less, 900 sq ft is an average value. If you are living at less than 500, as I do, that means there are those living in homes thqt have 1300 sq ft per person.
@@melmorrison1400 Also, how many Chevy Suburban's and Ford Expeditions do you see every day with 1 person in them? I see many. These are a personal choice.
Some of us in the atmospheric scientific community have been calling out the Net Zero concept. Read The Conversation “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap”
Hellooo Sorelle. You've mentioned "follow the money" a couple of times on your channel... I was wondering if you could provide an example of how you would do that? What sources would you trust for info etc...
Did they not know that the best carbon capture machine is already invented? It is a tree.
Haha, yes!
Totally agree and they are cutting them down, every chance they get.
What is even funnier is they are cutting them down for fuel to make electricity, how's that for NET ZERO!!!!
The biggest lie ever told? There are so many.
I just LOVE your channel!
I'm mixed about this... yes of course we want to reach Net Zero, but we also have many large industries that are tied into many things including our countries economy, international trade and relations. For those companies to survive they need to make a change, and capital is needed to make that change. As we invest further, the carbon capture technology will improve and we will reach better economies of scale. We are also working on improved scrubbers for companies and while mining for rare materials and such for batteries may take a toll on our earth, as more and more companies move towards using batteries the technology can be improved and hopefully utilize more readily available materials.
I also see some of that money given to these companies as an unofficial bribe... if we continue to pursue Net Zero, it will impact their expenses and how they do business. From the companies side, it's a win. They can take the extra money to use infrastructure and there's always a chance that another Trump will get elected and decide to cancel or delay any Net Zero deadlines. Overall, yeah, it's going to cost us money and time, and money is going to be "wasted", but I still think it's worth it and worth moving in that direction. The other side of Net Zero is that it places responsibility on companies to either ensure that they are lowering their emissions and pollution done to the environment, or that they are doing something beneficial to help displace the damage they've done to the environment. So, even though we may not be able to yet hold other countries accountable, we should move towards improving legislature towards punishing companies and helping enforce Net Zero in such a way that won't drive business to other countries.
Another thing to consider is the countries where these initiatives are taking place. In larger countries, with lots of greenery and spread out industry, Net Zero may not make much of a visible difference, but with countries that suffer from constant air pollution and micro dust and other particles in the air, programs like these would be much more beneficial to the people working and living here. As well, some countries are close enough together that the unregulated pollution from one country and can harm the air in it's neighboring countries. Not sure if the video maker has travelled much in the world, but perhaps they have either seen or been to places that suffer from air pollution. So, Net Zero may not just be good for the globe, but also for countries that suffer from poor air.
Making money is not inherently evil. Concentrations of power, however, are. (Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.)
Thank you a ton Sorelle and Leon for all the great content you are both putting together all this time! Although I love watching you talk about environmental topics, I would be really grateful if you could leave the sources for your videos on the description box. I just want to read more about it to educate myself. Thank you again for your great work! :)
Nice video on the term “Net Zero”. I’d like to see one on the term “Climate Crisis” too!
The phrase 'climate crisis' is just a result of scaremongering inflation
First Global warming, then Climate Change, then Climate Crisis
What next? Climate Apocalypse, Climate Holocaust
It means she will still eat but Millions will starve.
I think the best saying I can think of for this is 'Don't piss on me and tell me that it's raining."
Co 2 has mostly positive effects for the environment
I think what I learned from this wisdom is big business will use whatever catchphrase to justify their complicity
You’re a picture of good health and bright brilliance. Thanks for the real deal trusting in truth.
Thank YOU for watching!
Sharp, sincere, professional.
Thanks for speaking up.
Bad policy doesn’t mean we should threw our hands up and do nothing …. Thanks for spreading awareness
Your videos are awesome and informative AF, I love following your path for years and seeing how you’re progressing every day. You’re my inspiration and I always remember about ya when struggling with my new channel but seeing how u did it gives me hope that I can do it too 🙌🏼❤️
I appreciate that! Thank you so much.
THANK YOU SORELLE.. ALWAYS AN INFORMATIVE SUBJECT. 😎👍🌴
Very welcome!
Your doing an AMAZING work! Your KILLING it right now. RESPECT!
Thanks from Ireland.
Your videos are so amazing guys. Absolutely love to follow your channel. For 15 years I was diving DEEEEEP in all this kind of stuff but you guys are truly stand the crowd in communicating all this corruption in a "positive" way. Keep on doing what you do!
I really appreciate the amount of research you put in to each one of your videos. Thank you!!!!
Check out Bjorn lomborg
We need more carbon dioxide in our atmosphere for the plants (we use 8x carbon dioxide in greenhouses) and so that we don’t end up like Mars (lost it’s atmosphere)
thank you Sorelle, brilliant video as always.
Thank you for your efforts to enlighten us
My pleasure
Great presentation. It would be also helpful to do a clear analysis, as others have done, on how man made CO2 not only is not causing climate change but is actually helping tree and plant growth worldwide.
Absolutely, at 200 ppm like in the 1750ties it would be very hard to feed the word. Thank God for the 400 ppm we have today.
What's the point, many have done this comprehensively but people still believe the lies. Geoengineering has been thoroughly exposed yet it's still ignored. You can take a horse to the water...
Sorelle I was born in wealth, e.g. going to all the fancy places around the world, living in big houses, riding boats, what not, as my parents worked for the devil promoting cigarettes (or his buddies, e.g. Philip Morris). And by the age of 10 a new world started for me as I first understood what it means if you have no money (my father died and we stopped all ventures). blabla I'm not trying to make this too much about me or anything just with my 37 years of age what I feel to have witnessed is the whole spectrum of how humans can bullshit themselves into anything against either themselves or others, and that there are always people who will use / and abuse you in that situation if they can. Erst kommt das Fressen, dann die Moral. HOWEVER THERE ARE ANIMALS ON THIS PLANET WORTH FIGHTING FOR.
LONG STORY SHORT I highly appreciate your work and it is something that truly resonates with my heart neurons.
Fantastic reporting. I think those of us that are paying attention know that Environmental Politics re a sham but it's hard to explain who the players are. Thanks.
Thanks so much for the video and info
You are so welcome!
You can capture carbon and put it back in the ground by planting trees and other plants. It's ridiculously easy and the benefits are more than just putting carbon back in the ground.
Hush serf, you shall eat d bugs!!
My family land has some oil wells on it and I used to work in the oilfield. If I learned anything from this experiences, it is to never trust an oil company. They'll say whatever they need to say, then do whatever it takes to make the most profit. They leave their oil equipment that they aren't using just lying around and they refuse to clean it up.
If it is not leaking into the raw ground and covered why would it matter
Tak bardzo Cię szanuję za to co robisz :)
The level of CO2 in atmosphere is almost linearly connected with photosynthesis output, or in popular terms with harvest output. Management of the atmospheric CO2 level by some restrictive measures and carbon-caption facilities could help someone to control the level of harvest output. This make easier to push the agenda on necessity of the "voluntary" human population reduction due to scarcity of food.
rising CO2 levels decreases stomata levels in plants, making them more water efficient and drought resistant. CO2 also makes plants grow bigger and faster.
@@SoloRenegade Exactly. I am a farmer and carbon is our friend. You would have to be deranged to want to go back to the mini European ice age of a couple of hundred years ago with crops failures, mass starvation with carbon in atmosphere at apparently 280 ppm. Now the globalists and their scientists patsies are screaming about 500ppm, which is probably a healthy amount of potential plant food for our planet and crop harvests. A warmer planet is more habitable than a colder one as evidenced by the greening of deserts in Africa and here in Australia. For the population control evil read mass starvation and destruction of human fertility with pharmaceuticals and electro magnetic tech.
Carbon is the foundation upon which life is constructed. "Decarbonisation" is a meaningles nasty term and part of a human imprisonment strategy.
@@simonbrownbridge1799 exactly right. Northern Canada used to be covered in forests, indicating a much warmer past. I come from farming as well, and still help out from time to time. My Dad laughs every time I mention the latest claims about climate, as we've been seeing record crop yields year after year, and he too understands the importance of things like carbon. This year in particular has been a bit more challenging though with very aggressive weed growth and insects (but we don't see it as a bad thing, some weeds and insects are particularly beneficial). We're seeing wildlife at levels not seen in many decades. It's like the planet is energized with new growth.
widespread plant death, and a subsequent mass extinction due to irreparable damage to the food chain, would occur if CO2 levels dropped below 150-180ppm. But that's where the climate crazies want us to be. Humans would lose all of their food sources if that happened and most of the world's population would die from starvation.
@@SoloRenegade isn't starvation, or at least hunger, the goal?
@@kevinwantstoshred yes, the communists among us definitely believe in population control and poverty. Communists love bread lines.
I did a consulting project for a company that wanted to boast about their 100% green energy use. What they were in fact doing was paying the higher "renewable" electricity rate - an elective rate electric companies use to subsidize their economically unsustainable renewable electricity generation projects - but the actual electricity these "renewable" customers receive is no different to the electricity anyone paying the regular rate receives - it all comes off the same grid undifferentiated by source. BTW, Sorelle, you really need to wise up. Global warming falls entirely within what were the long-established margins of error for the measurement of temperature... except the historic temperature trends against which present-day temperatures are measured is indirectly derived through secondary effects such as tree rings. The more you know about actual science, the less you will fall for "science." There is no climate "crisis" and fossil fuels are the only thing standing between humanity and extinction.
Thank you for that. It was very informative. And I believe what you are saying. But I do need to ask:- what are your sources of the information?
Great work Sorrelle
🔝
You deserve a entire TVshow for your good work
... with these cracking topics ? ... not gonna happen !
Your hearts in the right place, however, in case you haven’t noticed, the mainstream media channels are invested in covering up the truth for the megacorps. They aren’t going to air anything akin to the channel like this.
Ahhhh, the old “follow the money”.
Now track the trillions in grants given to scientists telling us about the end of the world. It makes the oil industry look like a little con job.
The only real money given to actual lead scientists is via military interests
@@danfontaine8179 again track the money. Research grant money from bill gates, Blackrock and other outside interests heavily invested in renewables. If you add “because climate change” into your research you will be generously funded, if you don’t you are defunded vilified sacked or cancelled.
Almost as bad as a coal fired power station switching to burning wood pellets, which are imported from the other side of the world and which produce 10% more co2 per kw hour produced than coal. And then having that same power station receive a billion pounds a year from taxpayers because apparently they are green. Which power station… Drax. In the UK.
Great Work!
Like I explain in my book, The Decline And Fall Of The Human Race (amazon books), the entire world civilization is in decline and what do you expect the largest companies in the world (oil) to do when people and now governments are now (almost fully) on the climate crisis agenda. They make millions of dollars from a product that people want to phase out. Do you expect them to go willingly?
Sadly a lot of people start questioning entirely if our planet is doing bad because of their actions. It’s all so complex and hidden they start believing that none of it is real. And that might lead to people not questioning anything anymore because it’s all fake anyways and climate change as a whole is just a scam.
Hello Sorelle, I sure like the videos that you put out, your awsome keep the good work up
The best way to capture CO2? Repair the soil (without chemicals) and plant trees (Properly with maintenance.) At the same time lift people in the areas of ruined land out of poverty. Half the worlds soils are degraded. To me that is a large part of the solution and I would also remind you that the soil degradation is made worse by Agribusiness practices with poisons added to the problem. Small is beautiful...
The international carbon council just slapped an impressive ad on your video 🤫
Your body, my choice.
- Blackface Trudeau 🌚😝
😂
Sorelle your spot on! Love your videos!
Glad you like them! Thanks for watching!
@3:35 I COULD USE A FISH SANDWICH RIGHT NOW.. LOL
Wow, Wow, Wow!!! Excellent presentation!
Well done!
Great work as always
Thank you!
I'm interested in the comparison of how much money is invested in 'real' clean energy sources such as nuclear and solar energies compared to technologies such as CCS.
And if nuclear and solar energies are truly clean or are they just another scam
They aren't clean because to manufacture parts you need energy which you primarily get from gas which is just more CO2 emissions. They can become clean if they generate enough power without emitting CO2, but it is very difficult to calculate if they are "clean" or not. No resource is "truly clean", there are only slightly better alternatives. We also have to think about the calorific value and the time needed to generate the energy. 1 gallon of oil vs 1 sq. ft of solar panel vs 1 g of Uranium as an example of comparison
@@manmeetsingh3024 and presently nuclear outstrips them all and is by far the greenest and we now have very safe ways of returning the waste deep in the earth where it can decay !! supplemented with solar tidal and wind energy we could be come very green until the fission nut is cracked and then we would be truly free to travel the stars ??
It's all a scam to take more money and power away from ordinary people and give it to the rich.
@@manmeetsingh3024 Nothing wrong with c02.
It's good for the environment.
@@fustercluck2460 how is that?
Thank you for teaching the truth to the world.
Would love to spend a day with you seeing how you do your research! Grad student here in an environmental type program and you seem to be light years ahead of what we talk about.
Explain yourself better, as you don't seem to get your point over, reference to an actual?