Why 90% Of Your Favourite Photographer's Work Sucks

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 9

  • @deeveeoh
    @deeveeoh 4 месяца назад +2

    This is the same concept in music in that not every song is an absolute BANGER, most bands/artists produce a TON of mediocre songs and if they're lucky they manage to cobble together a hit and it took the whole journey of writing it all to get to the hit 👌

  • @TCMx3
    @TCMx3 4 месяца назад +3

    Volume matters. So too does introspection. Taking more photos means more opportunities to ask yourself "why doesn't this work?"

  • @jpconlon4521
    @jpconlon4521 4 месяца назад +1

    Love this! The comparison to the comedian trying out jokes was spot on!

    • @maxkent
      @maxkent  4 месяца назад

      Thanks dude!!

  • @chriscard6544
    @chriscard6544 4 месяца назад +2

    I totally agree. Henri-Cartier Bresson took thousands of pictures for 1 good. The thing is: dont love your pictures too much and be very hard with your work. Delete many , keep 10%.
    But to me failure is not the point, point is frustration. Patience and persistence are the keystone. The other side is style: consistency.

  • @marioarias9942
    @marioarias9942 4 месяца назад

    Does that mean if my work sucks 100% I’ll be an even better photographer! Yippee! 😄

  • @fukolombobby
    @fukolombobby 4 месяца назад +1

    good message all the duds are like the toll fee for a good picture. Although it does feels even worse on film, getting duds knowing each one cost money. Spent like $500 on film and developing and most of the picture are just ok; 30% are bad, 50% are ok. 15% good, and 5% are great

    • @maxkent
      @maxkent  4 месяца назад

      I guess usually when shooting film were more selective so the hit rate can be higher but yeah, I feel u

  • @scoruluce
    @scoruluce 4 месяца назад +1