Smh if i had to take the stand and mr Bailey asked me to state my name for the record i would of asked the court if i could check my birth certificate, dental records, and three forms of identification before i answer...he is amazing
@@AN-vt8qq Only is his mind ! No Vincent Bugliosi is Monday Morning Quarterbacking and his opinions would not have beat the experts Like Peter Neufeld, Barry Scheck, Robert Blasier, Drs . Michael Baden, Henry Lee, Fredric Reiders . The Defense Team would have eaten him alive
Julie Alley he should Have taken notes on his last case.....he ended up in prison for six weeks for dabbling with drug money. Shapiro testified against him.
Pommie bears u ass hole it was a bio chem stock that matured n he used it as collateral n end up in contempt ‼️you cud never b as good at ur profession ‼️
F lee Bailey was a masterful, skillful criminal lawyer. He was like a dental surgeon pulling rotten molars from a person. However, he was pulling lies out of L. A. Police dept.
Lies? What lies? Please expound on that. What did they lie about, and while you're at it, please explain the overwhelming evidence that the simpleton, AND nullificationed, jury, ignored? LOL. Another simpleton who doesn't understand things in front of their face. Please tell me you're not another one of the simpletons who can't comprehend that DNA can be contaminated, BUT ..... BUT, it doesn't change the DNA source itself. Please tell me you're not one of those clowns. At LEAST admit jury nullification, which now, twenty eight years later, we KNOW happened based on three jurors admitting it themselves. Stupidity isn't a good way to go through life.
Funny how perceptions vary. I see loud antics to stir emotion. I do agree that a drunk driving sleazeball embezzler is likely good at manipulating people and facts to dodge accountability.
@@icaanul Shapiro gave the case to Lee Bailey,paid with stocks not worth the paper they were printed on.During the trial Bailey dismantled the FBI investigaton.The defendant was fully acquitted.The stocks rose to $23 million.Shapiro wanted stocks back,the FBI took the money and charged Lee with several crimes.
Agreed. Detective Furhman discovering evidence after making other detectives talk to witnesses is very concerning and difficult to believe he didn’t fabricate due to his history of perjury and malicious conduct against POC.
I certainly love to watch F Lee Bailey at work. From the moment he stepped up to the podium and I watched the twinkle in his eyes .... I knew I would not be the slightest bit bored that’s for sure. I find the prosecution’s direct examination - in general - a bit disjointed especially Marcia Clark’s tightrope walk what she can get in before the next objection. The objections by the defense cite the grounds in legal terms as opposed to speaking objections which get so annoying when the lawyers are warned every single time. These guys are top notch litigators that’s for damn sure. I don’t remember hearing as many “I don’t know’s” in answer to what sound like fair questions. Wow This is serious law school.
If these LAPD cops who testified at the Simpson trial are the Best of the LAPD, that City is in DEEP trouble. The LAPD should have known--right off the bat--that the Simson murder case was going to be very High Profile. And the response should have been from the LAPD that they were going to put their best people on the Simpson case and spend the money, resources needed for a Top Priority murder case. These Cops at the Simson trial don't even look like they prepared AT ALL for their testimony.
if cops had nothing to fear in this trial, they should not had been so nervous. it was like seeing a bunch of alcoholics at a methodist meeting, trying to prove they drank no alcohol before
+alvindlee1 Two reasons: 1) relevancy-- they have no relevance to any material issue in the case at all. Nothing. 2) even if they have relevance (which would be nominal at best) the prejudicial effect to the opposing party (the People) far outweighs any probative value it has. What Ito did was unprecedented. There is no other example that I know of where a criminal trial judge has allowed a satellite trial on a non-material or secondary issue as in this case. There simply is none and there is no justification for it.
A star witness in a murder trail, will always have to endure cross-examination, from the defense, and if that witness testimony can be withdrawn with audio evidence? This is a defense Attorneys Dream! At any rate, this same audio reviled information about Judge Ito's wife, which was Furhmans boss at one point.? And Judge Ito, The prosecution office of LA County, was well aware of the debacle of the lawless police dept at Rampart. 3 Rampart police officers were held in police protective custody at the time, for cooperating with the DA. My wish was Ito, was replaced as Judge, and watch the corrupt LAPD crash and burn.
+alvindlee1 Of course a witness has to endure cross-examination. However, that cross-examination has to comply with the court rules and rules of evidence. The Rules of Evidence does not allow for evidence that is irrelevant or relevant evidence that is substantially more prejudicial than it is probative. The Fuhrman tapes would have/should have been kept out under either rule. You are correct in that Fuhrman criticized Ito's wife on those tapes and many legal scholars, including me, thought he should have recused himself just for that particular issue and he could have resumed with presiding over the rest of the trial.
The cops bungled this one but good! Not surprised one bit. Even with planting blood evidence & the glove, the DA still lost the case. What a passle of losers. Wait, Marcia did win a few lustful nights with Darden though.
they had no probable cause to go into his home. for a speck of blood on a car?! and then it wasnt even blood on the bronco it was actually taco sauce or some food substance smh. its unbelievable that they did all this with no initial search warrant!
diamondluv100---During the civil trial a LAPD mechanic report surfaced.They called a mechanic to verify the Bronco was operable,you cannot find evidence of a murder in a vehicle not operable.They then find the speck on the door.
When a man is guilty, all any defense team does is , try to put the blame on the detectives. This is what the defense team is doing and this means OJ is guilty. Watch 100 trials and this is the outcome. If OJ was innocent, the defense team would find the true killer or at lease other suspects. There's no other suspect. The husband is always a suspect, the number one suspect. Most crimes like this are usually, crimes of passion. Especially when the husband or ex was a wife beater. If a man can't control his temper or let go of his ex and is stalking her, beatings can become murder. OJ couldn't stand the thought of Nicole sleeping with another man. Catching her with Ron, sent him over the edge. The defense team was lousy, the mostly black jury was ignorant and racist. Their interviews proved it. Pee Wee Herman could have defended OJ and won, with this jury. The dogs love for Nicole was truer than OJ's
BOB OVER First off, it is not the responsibility of a defense attorney to "find suspects"; that is the job of the state attorneys office and law enforcement and yes, they sometimes arrest innocent people. A defense attorney is responsible for defending their client. This includes but not limited to questioning law enforcement actions before and after the arrest. Many innocent people had their freedom restored after it was discovered that police officials lied or the state attorneys office withheld information that proved the innocence of the alleged suspect. Furthermore, you're lying when you said defense attorneys attack law enforcement on the stand. In most cases, law enforcement officers have no first hand knowledge and are not true witnesses; their entire investigation is based on statements of all parties involved. Even a decent attorney knows that questioning someone who wasn't even there is pointless because it would all be hearsay. Instead, all said parties involved would take the stand to be cross examined by the defense attorney.
The objective of the defense is to cast reasonable doubt. That's it. Their job is not to find who did it, it's to say that their client didn't do it before the Court.
How can the defence find the real killers, when other avenues were never investigated? There are no other suspects, because they never investigated further than 'we have our man'. I'm this far through watching the entire case, and i still do not think oj did it. I think there's more to nicoles life behind the scenes not mentioned. The cocaine world is a brutal. And whoever slit her throat that badly. wanted her to stay quiet.
Nicole fucked Marcus Allen, one of OJ's best friends, years earlier and he didn't kill her then. Nicole wrote letters to OJ stating how she wanted to get back together. She asked OJ to let her move back in with him. Her friends Faye Resnick & Cora Fishman were all telling OJ how Nicole still loved him and wanted him back whike he was with Paula Barberari (spelling?). If OJ wanted Nicole back it's quite obvious he could've had her.
F Lee Bailey is a master, but a lack of shoeprints is 100% possible due to a killer removing his/her shoes before stepping onto a pathway. I find it incredible that he wouldn’t know this.
He got away because the jurors wanted to get payback for all the years of black oppression. Im not sure how setting free a double murderer who almost completely cut off his 'love's' head is a way of getting payback though.
@@philipwilliams1754 Ok - so they find blood before OJ even gave a blood sample the next day in order to plant? How does that makes sense ? And why would 3 independent labs (ie not connected to LAPD) find the same result ?
Hey, I watched this live, now so many years later, this court room was not good from the Judge to all these lawyers, Nicole was stalked , butchered unfortunately her friend Ron Goldman stopped by and was Butchered as well this should be shown at Colleges that have lawyers going to school on what not to do
Well wouldn’t you assume from the start, that he’s felt systematic oppression from the police in his lifetime? He’s from a minority group, that Especially in CA (at the time), we’re being targeted by police; had been for decades. Of course he would empathize with the defense, at the least! Does it mean it skewed his judgement? No. Marcia was an awful choice for the case, and he peers knew it. The state blew it, and the Defense were holding the nuts straight, the ENTIRE time. Ito was fair, and just.
Hmmmmm... don't see it. He seems to favor the rules of court and law... you just may be conserving and displeased that the rules or law may favor the defense
michael ostle not that wise. He spent six weeks in prison and Shapiro testified against him...lol! Shouldn’t have taken drug money. You’d think he’d have been wiser than that.
Why the concern over Officer Riske using Nicole’s phone.... wouldn’t there be precise phone records? Also the name ‘Dad’ on the phone could mean Nichol’s Dad
Yep. The phone company would produce all incoming and outgoing numbers on subpoena. Just another smoke screen, sounds horrible but the underlying fact makes it meaningless. Which is why so much of the defense cross is all hat, very little cattle
@@lynndragoman1573 the phone records, which were produced at the preliminary, would have shown if the phone had been used. They didn't. It was just a dumb mistake on Riske's part
@@lbca81 nobody cares if the murderer ordered pizza or phoned a friend. Fingerprints would give an identity. The murderer could have taken the phone from Nicole before the murders. They didn't have to make a call.
@@lynndragoman1573 I didn't say Riske was right but the phone company had the tech at the time to see who called her and who she called. If the phone had been used during the relevant time it would have been known.
All these Bailey lovers in the comments confuse me. He asks a bunch of hypotheticals. Half of his “questions” were arguments bordering on testimony. The judge just allowed it too with minimal admonishment. There is nothing about this man that’s special.
@@lynndragoman1573 So first of all they did object quite a bit. Perhaps not in this exact footage but in subsequent videos. Most of them were overruled. But more importantly, I never said the prosecution wasn’t incompetent either. I think the state was a large part of why OJ walked.
@@mattbrown8139 so your posting about a different video? Usually people watch a video and comment on that video. So we are on the same page my comments where about a different case from a different decade and my points are spot on. Do you see how that works?
@@lynndragoman1573 That's what you got out of my comment? Lol. You do realize this video is but one part of 6 for this particular day alone right? When watching in succession, I feel it's reasonable to comment on the performance as a whole. And no, we aren't on the same page. You're "comparison" or whatever that drivel was, is absurd. As I said, and as should be perfectly clear to anyone with any sense whatsoever, there are 6 videos pertaining to this day alone. At least 2 of them, maybe more, Bailey is questioning the witness. Be better.
@@mattbrown8139 yeah I usually comment in the comment section for the video posted. I think if you watch these videos they have a comment section under all 6 of the videos. I don't know why they put a comment section under each video when they can just have one big comment section for all videos on RUclips and we can guess what comment belongs to what video. This comment was for the ham and cheese omelette video not the bacon and cheddar omelette video in case anyone is interested. Lolroflmao.
The totality of physical evidence (blood and his cut finger) coupled with the fact that all of it would be hard to imagine (within reason) that it was tampered with is certainly one large key. His past actions and true behind the camera personality adds fuel. The easy to understand timeline of the crime coupled with his lack of alibi is another key. Several pieces not shown to the jury (man at airport seeing him throwing stuff into trash, some of the eyewitness accounts regarding the timeline) add more fuel and of course the Bronco chase, actually fleeing with a gun to your head start to seal it up. His pre-trial disposition and domineer just fall into a classic action of true guilt. It's just beyond reason to believe that he didn't do it in my opinion. Now, why he got off is another argument as you know...and one that stirs racial tension going both ways and some of the most idiotic comments you will ever read. Those types of comments quickly move the case to asking questions about everything except his guilt or innocence and that's why the defense brought up many of the same inquiries...
But they charged OJ before the blood evidence was even tested. How long does it take for DNA to come back?One day? In 1994? What if when the blood tests came back and didn't match OJ? Do you think they would have said oops we made a mistake? While the entire world was watching? LAPD already had a bad reputation, they wanted to save face. They had a blood sample they took from him the next day after the murders, easily could have been planted.
Philip Williams Philip....THATS not true. Lol. You think the defense measured the amount of his blood drops and testified to that? You know they never said that.
Smh if i had to take the stand and mr Bailey asked me to state my name for the record i would of asked the court if i could check my birth certificate, dental records, and three forms of identification before i answer...he is amazing
😂😂😂
HONESTLY I agree 😂😂😂😂
Cuck a DOODLE DOO -- How's that LOW IQ treating YOU?
Yes !
I 2nd that emotion ♡
Dream Team at it's best. Bailey was a great attorney
Love how Cochran appreciates F Lee Bailey at work
Lol... Vincent bugliosi would have made them all look like fools
@@AN-vt8qq Only is his mind ! No Vincent Bugliosi is Monday Morning Quarterbacking and his opinions would not have beat the experts Like Peter Neufeld, Barry Scheck, Robert Blasier, Drs . Michael Baden, Henry Lee, Fredric Reiders . The Defense Team would have eaten him alive
@@AN-vt8qqhighly doubtful
@@AN-vt8qq Bugliosi convicted Manson whom was represented by Public Defender.He walked into to with swastika carved into his forehead.
Bailey does nothing but listen. He takes NO notes. Proves the experts don’t need notes. Prosecutors were staggeringly incompetent
Julie Alley he should Have taken notes on his last case.....he ended up in prison for six weeks for dabbling with drug money. Shapiro testified against him.
Pommie bears u ass hole it was a bio chem stock that matured n he used it as collateral n end up in contempt ‼️you cud never b as good at ur profession ‼️
@@jonathanrowe2995 Disbarred and penniless. Serves him right.
@@pommiebears --He was never paid for that case also.
@@B-ch6uk --Wrong,still a very wealthy.
F lee Bailey was a masterful, skillful criminal lawyer. He was like a dental surgeon pulling rotten molars from a person. However, he was pulling lies out of L. A. Police dept.
Lies? What lies? Please expound on that. What did they lie about, and while you're at it, please explain the overwhelming evidence that the simpleton, AND nullificationed, jury, ignored? LOL. Another simpleton who doesn't understand things in front of their face. Please tell me you're not another one of the simpletons who can't comprehend that DNA can be contaminated, BUT ..... BUT, it doesn't change the DNA source itself. Please tell me you're not one of those clowns. At LEAST admit jury nullification, which now, twenty eight years later, we KNOW happened based on three jurors admitting it themselves. Stupidity isn't a good way to go through life.
Funny how perceptions vary. I see loud antics to stir emotion. I do agree that a drunk driving sleazeball embezzler is likely good at manipulating people and facts to dodge accountability.
@@icaanul Shapiro gave the case to Lee Bailey,paid with stocks not worth the paper they were printed on.During the trial Bailey dismantled the FBI investigaton.The defendant was fully acquitted.The stocks rose to $23 million.Shapiro wanted stocks back,the FBI took the money and charged Lee with several crimes.
Sergeant Rossi is as confused about hearsay as I am :)))
Marcia was on a television show saying F. Lee Bailey was a has been. She has some nerve he ate her Lunch.
Bailey is so entertaining to watch.
Very
so much this.. its the same for me for other things.. watching someone do something that they are truly a master at, is fascinating
But not hear his cough
This officer doesn't seem to be very bright
Kevin Davis many aren’t. They have to do something that pays the bills
@@nodnarb4002 hes Italian
nodnarb nodnarb they have to have a college degree before becoming a officer I had thought
@@SR-jn2hn -Fhurman a high school drop out.He barely reads.
😂
Bailey's cross-examination is another St. Valentine's day massacre
Great comment !!
❤ ❤
Two lives were lost that’s the sad part
Kashif Malik, you share the exact name of someone I've known since high school. Are you one and the same? Where you from?
24:14 can see Johnny says "he wasn't there" Bailey bringing out the trash!
Bailey is a juggernaut
They didn't call the coroner,confusing the time of death.
Oj was not the killer
I 2nd that emotion.
I think..JASON SIMPSON
is the KILLER !!
Yes he was
Agreed. Detective Furhman discovering evidence after making other detectives talk to witnesses is very concerning and difficult to believe he didn’t fabricate due to his history of perjury and malicious conduct against POC.
@@carolecompton9270 He had no injuries and an alibi.
Shut up
Sounds like Marcia's first trial... 🤣 she is horrible.
Against Bailey in cross every lawyer in the US looked like an amateur. He was an average lawyer in other areas but a God in cross.
PERIOD!!!!@@texasforever7887
Rossi was doing fine until Bailey got a hold of him.
I certainly love to watch F Lee Bailey at work. From the moment he stepped up to the podium and I watched the twinkle in his eyes .... I knew I would not be the slightest bit bored that’s for sure. I find the prosecution’s direct examination - in general - a bit disjointed especially Marcia Clark’s tightrope walk what she can get in before the next objection. The objections by the defense cite the grounds in legal terms as opposed to speaking objections which get so annoying when the lawyers are warned every single time. These guys are top notch litigators that’s for damn sure. I don’t remember hearing as many “I don’t know’s” in answer to what sound like fair questions. Wow This is serious law school.
If these LAPD cops who testified at the Simpson trial are the Best of the LAPD, that City is in DEEP trouble. The LAPD should have known--right off the bat--that the Simson murder case was going to be very High Profile. And the response should have been from the LAPD that they were going to put their best people on the Simpson case and spend the money, resources needed for a Top Priority murder case. These Cops at the Simson trial don't even look like they prepared AT ALL for their testimony.
RIP F Lee Bailey
AMEN....To that.....
❤
Bailey: A master at work!
Vien Doduc more like a drunken slime ball at work.
@@ddsara6566 --Innocent.
Bailey: disbarred
master at working the jury? his 'arguments' / questions are complete b.s.
@@B-ch6uk --Retaliation for destroying the Racist LAPD.
if cops had nothing to fear in this trial, they should not had been so nervous. it was like seeing a bunch of alcoholics at a methodist meeting, trying to prove they drank no alcohol before
50+ million people watching you through a camera mounted on the wall, you're telling me you wouldn't be nervous?
Police Academy 5 months.
Beauty College 2 years.
Think about it!
What Beauty College did you go to?
The only officer that seems honest. Im gladd he didnt get tainted...
Riske very honest too
BAILEY IS THE BEST
Where are the Furhman tapes?
Not in this segment. They shouldn't have been allowed at all.
1981lashlarue under what basis?
+alvindlee1 Two reasons: 1) relevancy-- they have no relevance to any material issue in the case at all. Nothing. 2) even if they have relevance (which would be nominal at best) the prejudicial effect to the opposing party (the People) far outweighs any probative value it has.
What Ito did was unprecedented. There is no other example that I know of where a criminal trial judge has allowed a satellite trial on a non-material or secondary issue as in this case. There simply is none and there is no justification for it.
A star witness in a murder trail, will always have to endure cross-examination, from the defense, and if that witness testimony can be withdrawn with audio evidence? This is a defense Attorneys Dream! At any rate, this same audio reviled information about Judge Ito's wife, which was Furhmans boss at one point.? And Judge Ito, The prosecution office of LA County, was well aware of the debacle of the lawless police dept at Rampart. 3 Rampart police officers were held in police protective custody at the time, for cooperating with the DA. My wish was Ito, was replaced as Judge, and watch the corrupt LAPD crash and burn.
+alvindlee1 Of course a witness has to endure cross-examination. However, that cross-examination has to comply with the court rules and rules of evidence. The Rules of Evidence does not allow for evidence that is irrelevant or relevant evidence that is substantially more prejudicial than it is probative. The Fuhrman tapes would have/should have been kept out under either rule. You are correct in that Fuhrman criticized Ito's wife on those tapes and many legal scholars, including me, thought he should have recused himself just for that particular issue and he could have resumed with presiding over the rest of the trial.
Oj: damn, maybe I didn’t do it 25:35
damn, that's how they did it.
ahahahahha gold comment
Of course OJ did it. Everyone knows killers park their bloody vehicles in the street for everyone to see… and throw evidence out in the open.
The cops bungled this one but good! Not surprised one bit. Even with planting blood evidence & the glove, the DA still lost the case. What a passle of losers. Wait, Marcia did win a few lustful nights with Darden though.
Gypsyfirefly--I feel bad for Darden.
According to the movie, darden rejected her advances and she got pissy with him afterwards.
F Lee Bailey could have his own show like Matlock
These aggressive attys need to dial it back... can't see the need to be such an a&%$$$%#$%hole to these witnesses
they had no probable cause to go into his home. for a speck of blood on a car?! and then it wasnt even blood on the bronco it was actually taco sauce or some food substance smh. its unbelievable that they did all this with no initial search warrant!
diamondluv100---During the civil trial a LAPD mechanic report surfaced.They called a mechanic to verify the Bronco was operable,you cannot find evidence of a murder in a vehicle not operable.They then find the speck on the door.
They went to his house to let him know about the death and about his kids they still had blood evidence at rockingham
@@nl887 they found no blood evidence of OJ at the crime scene.
@@nl887 Fuhrman was at Rockingham,along with Brad Roberts first.
@@nl887 OJ was not next of kin, there was no reason for them to. It broke protocol.
When a man is guilty, all any defense team does is , try to put the blame on the detectives. This is what the defense team is doing and this means OJ is guilty. Watch 100 trials and this is the outcome. If OJ was innocent, the defense team would find the true killer or at lease other suspects. There's no other suspect. The husband is always a suspect, the number one suspect. Most crimes like this are usually, crimes of passion. Especially when the husband or ex was a wife beater. If a man can't control his temper or let go of his ex and is stalking her, beatings can become murder. OJ couldn't stand the thought of Nicole sleeping with another man. Catching her with Ron, sent him over the edge. The defense team was lousy, the mostly black jury was ignorant and racist. Their interviews proved it. Pee Wee Herman could have defended OJ and won, with this jury. The dogs love for Nicole was truer than OJ's
BOB OVER First off, it is not the responsibility of a defense attorney to "find suspects"; that is the job of the state attorneys office and law enforcement and yes, they sometimes arrest innocent people. A defense attorney is responsible for defending their client. This includes but not limited to questioning law enforcement actions before and after the arrest. Many innocent people had their freedom restored after it was discovered that police officials lied or the state attorneys office withheld information that proved the innocence of the alleged suspect. Furthermore, you're lying when you said defense attorneys attack law enforcement on the stand. In most cases, law enforcement officers have no first hand knowledge and are not true witnesses; their entire investigation is based on statements of all parties involved. Even a decent attorney knows that questioning someone who wasn't even there is pointless because it would all be hearsay. Instead, all said parties involved would take the stand to be cross examined by the defense attorney.
The objective of the defense is to cast reasonable doubt. That's it. Their job is not to find who did it, it's to say that their client didn't do it before the Court.
How can the defence find the real killers, when other avenues were never investigated? There are no other suspects, because they never investigated further than 'we have our man'. I'm this far through watching the entire case, and i still do not think oj did it. I think there's more to nicoles life behind the scenes not mentioned. The cocaine world is a brutal. And whoever slit her throat that badly. wanted her to stay quiet.
BOB OVER You are guilty for receiving free money from your family off other people backs so please stfu
Nicole fucked Marcus Allen, one of OJ's best friends, years earlier and he didn't kill her then. Nicole wrote letters to OJ stating how she wanted to get back together. She asked OJ to let her move back in with him. Her friends Faye Resnick & Cora Fishman were all telling OJ how Nicole still loved him and wanted him back whike he was with Paula Barberari (spelling?). If OJ wanted Nicole back it's quite obvious he could've had her.
8:25 LMAO!! Right after he told him JUST ANSWER the questions posed... 24:24 The kids 28:54 He asks about kids calling 30:19 Even the judge stepped in
Cop is so arrogant and that awful smirk
Shame on you Ito, this is such a farce. Way out of control, absolutely insane
That’s why they call him Bulldog 😂 Peel the skin.
F Lee Bailey is a master, but a lack of shoeprints is 100% possible due to a killer removing his/her shoes before stepping onto a pathway. I find it incredible that he wouldn’t know this.
There would've been bloody foot print's.
@@philipwilliams1754 wat? If they removed the shoes, there wouldn't be bloody prints afterwards since there would be no blood on their feet. lol wtf
O.J got away due to police/ detectives errors.
He got away because the jurors wanted to get payback for all the years of black oppression. Im not sure how setting free a double murderer who almost completely cut off his 'love's' head is a way of getting payback though.
@@creativemd275 of course you don't understand...😴😴😴😴😴
He got off because of the CONSTITUTION. Read what it says about REASONABLE DOUBT
@@creativemd275 -OJ IS INNOCENT.
@@philipwilliams1754 Ok - so they find blood before OJ even gave a blood sample the next day in order to plant? How does that makes sense ? And why would 3 independent labs (ie not connected to LAPD) find the same result ?
Mis K here: Lawd that uniform and tan clash
Hey, I watched this live, now so many years later, this court room was not good from the Judge to all these lawyers, Nicole was stalked , butchered unfortunately her friend Ron Goldman stopped by and was Butchered as well this should be shown at Colleges that have lawyers going to school on what not to do
he seems to have similar mouth movements as Kato
i like judge ito and his side bars
He's obnoxious
Towards the end ffs 🤦♂️ what an ass if I was that officer I would of taken off my badge and quite never to be seen again!
I simply cant stand Judge dippy Ito, he has a very large ego and also favors the defense, thats obvious.
Well wouldn’t you assume from the start, that he’s felt systematic oppression from the police in his lifetime? He’s from a minority group, that Especially in CA (at the time), we’re being targeted by police; had been for decades. Of course he would empathize with the defense, at the least! Does it mean it skewed his judgement? No. Marcia was an awful choice for the case, and he peers knew it. The state blew it, and the Defense were holding the nuts straight, the ENTIRE time. Ito was fair, and just.
@@____teffYTJudge Ito was married to an LAPD officer who was a Deputy Chief.
Hmmmmm... don't see it. He seems to favor the rules of court and law... you just may be conserving and displeased that the rules or law may favor the defense
defense attorneys drama just like simpson, how do they all sit there trying to defend a guilty man.
34:10 (ish) “Exodus” 😅😅😅
pro bono, poor bailey
Poor Bailey lol he dined on it for the rest of his career very well
Wise old Fox
michael ostle not that wise. He spent six weeks in prison and Shapiro testified against him...lol! Shouldn’t have taken drug money. You’d think he’d have been wiser than that.
@@pommiebears smarter then you!!!
Why the concern over Officer Riske using Nicole’s phone.... wouldn’t there be precise phone records? Also the name ‘Dad’ on the phone could mean Nichol’s Dad
Yep. The phone company would produce all incoming and outgoing numbers on subpoena. Just another smoke screen, sounds horrible but the underlying fact makes it meaningless. Which is why so much of the defense cross is all hat, very little cattle
Fingerprints
@@lynndragoman1573 the phone records, which were produced at the preliminary, would have shown if the phone had been used. They didn't. It was just a dumb mistake on Riske's part
@@lbca81 nobody cares if the murderer ordered pizza or phoned a friend.
Fingerprints would give an identity.
The murderer could have taken the phone from Nicole before the murders. They didn't have to make a call.
@@lynndragoman1573 I didn't say Riske was right but the phone company had the tech at the time to see who called her and who she called. If the phone had been used during the relevant time it would have been known.
10 more training or nk
37:55
6:00 8:10
10laid oit ther rossi
Wait wait bzvk
This is cringe worthy. No wonder the jury thought this evil killer was innocent. Marcia BLEW this case! Embarrassing!!!
I find the notion of "hear-say" RIDICULOUS. You should be allowed to volunteer information.
The buffoonery and ignorance in your comment are laughable
We saw riskes giant foot lol
All these Bailey lovers in the comments confuse me. He asks a bunch of hypotheticals. Half of his “questions” were arguments bordering on testimony. The judge just allowed it too with minimal admonishment. There is nothing about this man that’s special.
The prosecution could have objected if what you say is correct and they didn't.
Ask yourself why.
@@lynndragoman1573 So first of all they did object quite a bit. Perhaps not in this exact footage but in subsequent videos. Most of them were overruled. But more importantly, I never said the prosecution wasn’t incompetent either. I think the state was a large part of why OJ walked.
@@mattbrown8139 so your posting about a different video?
Usually people watch a video and comment on that video.
So we are on the same page my comments where about a different case from a different decade and my points are spot on.
Do you see how that works?
@@lynndragoman1573 That's what you got out of my comment? Lol. You do realize this video is but one part of 6 for this particular day alone right? When watching in succession, I feel it's reasonable to comment on the performance as a whole. And no, we aren't on the same page. You're "comparison" or whatever that drivel was, is absurd. As I said, and as should be perfectly clear to anyone with any sense whatsoever, there are 6 videos pertaining to this day alone. At least 2 of them, maybe more, Bailey is questioning the witness. Be better.
@@mattbrown8139 yeah I usually comment in the comment section for the video posted.
I think if you watch these videos they have a comment section under all 6 of the videos.
I don't know why they put a comment section under each video when they can just have one big comment section for all videos on RUclips and we can guess what comment belongs to what video.
This comment was for the ham and cheese omelette video not the bacon and cheddar omelette video in case anyone is interested.
Lolroflmao.
Guilty then, still guilty now. God and anybody on earth with the brain power of dog also know it...
roundsaturn31 What part of the evidence was most convincing to u?
The totality of physical evidence (blood and his cut finger) coupled with the fact that all of it would be hard to imagine (within reason) that it was tampered with is certainly one large key. His past actions and true behind the camera personality adds fuel. The easy to understand timeline of the crime coupled with his lack of alibi is another key. Several pieces not shown to the jury (man at airport seeing him throwing stuff into trash, some of the eyewitness accounts regarding the timeline) add more fuel and of course the Bronco chase, actually fleeing with a gun to your head start to seal it up. His pre-trial disposition and domineer just fall into a classic action of true guilt. It's just beyond reason to believe that he didn't do it in my opinion. Now, why he got off is another argument as you know...and one that stirs racial tension going both ways and some of the most idiotic comments you will ever read. Those types of comments quickly move the case to asking questions about everything except his guilt or innocence and that's why the defense brought up many of the same inquiries...
But they charged OJ before the blood evidence was even tested. How long does it take for DNA to come back?One day? In 1994? What if when the blood tests came back and didn't match OJ? Do you think they would have said oops we made a mistake? While the entire world was watching? LAPD already had a bad reputation, they wanted to save face. They had a blood sample they took from him the next day after the murders, easily could have been planted.
@@diamondluv1009 -diamondluv100--The amt,of OJ blood found at the crime scene's were the exact amt.missing from his vial.
Philip Williams Philip....THATS not true. Lol. You think the defense measured the amount of his blood drops and testified to that? You know they never said that.