Constitutional Law: Equal Protection (Pt.2) - Intent Requirement (Washington v. Davis)

📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/android
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: [e-mail]
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Constitutional Law: 14th Amendment Equal Protection (Pt.2) - Governmental Intent Requirement
Primary sources of law for this video:
Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977).
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960).
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993).
Learn more: studicata.com

[@weissekatze1001]

Thank you so much. Really clear.

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

Fifth third bank exists

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

You think your wings are more, then get under mine.