I’m a doctor and we suffer from the same disease as lawyers- I’m a great doctor/lawyer therefore I’m a great pilot”- it just don’t work that way unfortunately
Another analogy a top tennis player who practices and plays nearly every day, thinks they can become a really good gymnast with only two or three hours of practice a month. At the gym they try a too difficult move on the beam...
As a subscriber to both of your channels its really cool that you're fine with Juan using your content as the collaboration really helps in understanding what happened. Thanks for doing what you do.
I'm "Old School ie; I learned flying from that. Fast forward 4+ decades, I respect & learn f/ both your channels,We learn f/others mistakes it's retention of those & application if & when a need arises,.I've had my share, yet there's still tomorrow. .Stay calm ..and FLY THE AIRPLANE, after all..in the end..that's ALL that really matters.Thanks & Hand shakes to you both. and Thanks for the great content ,Old low timers.
@@blancolirio what about the failure of his radio? You say he could still land while following some rules. How would someone know those rules in the event of radio failure? Is that well known to a pilot? What do you make of the sudden break to the right? Someone else speculated that something malfunctioning on the plane could have caused that.
@@18robsmith *"When RUclips demonetises a video I really hope they stop all adverts on that post as well"* Rob do you still believe in the Tooth Fairy too? Just as the privileged say "It is laws for thee but not for me!" ThemTube says it is demonetisation for thee but not for me!
In reference to Bobby Garcia ......... I highly recommend that any attorney or doctor group that needs an aircraft for business, hire a professional pilot to fly your aircraft. If you can afford a multi million dollar aircraft, pay $50 to $100K per year for a pilot to get you to and from home safely. Even if you want to fly your own plane, great. Just hire a safety pilot to fly in the right seat as an insurance policy.
I had many guys hire me as a safety pilot before my airline days... those were my scariest most hated jobs... would have been easier to just fly and be PIC instead of instructing someone on a CJ3 going into a busy terminal area... realizing the person in the left seat has no reason being in that seat... just hire a pro or two and sit in the back and drink..
Even if your ego won't allow you to take instructions from a SIC, sometime hire a pro pilot and just sit in the right seat and watch the pro. See how he plans ahead. Compare his planning techniques to yours.
The more I learn the more complicated it seems. Pilots have a so many responsibilities that they are required to calmly do almost automatically without errors. Just AMAZING!!!!! Great reporting as usual JB
re: "The more I learn the more complicated it seems." that's because it IS complicated (very) and let no one tell you different. combine Dunning-Kruger with a "bleeding edge" aircraft like the TBM and situation complexity amplifies by a factor of 10.
The pilot sounded evasive to me in his communications. I was taught to prioritize Skin, Tin, Ticket , in that order when dealing with an inflight incident. There may have been nothing ATC could do to help, but if you don’t ask.... Minimally, they can reduce your workload so you can concentrate on the problem by being honest with them. Can’t do that if you are worrying about your Ticket.
I so much appreciate having found both your and Victor’s channel - almost at the same time, about a year ago - because between the two of you one gets the best information, delivered in the best and professional way possible, and with heart too. So glad to see two such great channels collaborating (or at least that you Juan is using Victor’s great content while giving us the explanations for what’s happening and/or your thoughts on it). Thank you, you really are one of the best channels on YT.
@@hamletksquid2702 I did! I found Juan through my aviation interest, and found he has so much other interesting content as well. It's funny how ppl has found his channel bc of different things! I'm not American, though, I live in Sweden, and I didn't know the first thing about the area around Oroville. Now I do, I little, lol. I have a close friend in SoCal, but his area has thankfully not been as affected by the fires. They mostly have smaller fires during the season. Anyway, yeah I missed his reporting on the dam, but everything he talks about is interesting even though my main focus is aviation!
Thanks Juan. Tragic sequence of events. You do have to wonder what was going on in the background that caused the pilot to lose and have difficulty re-establishing comms with ATC. Physiological, pressurization or just distraction? The pilot sounded reasonably aware when he talked to ATC. Things clearly unraveled quickly once he started the descent from FL280. If I had to speculate, it would be that when the controller advised the pilot to continue direct to the airport (rather than a vector as he requested) he may not have understood what the controller had in mind and felt like he had to expedite the descent due to how close he was to the airport by that point. I can see a scenario where he disconnected the autopilot as a fast way to initiate the descent or it accidentally tripped off. The TBM is a slippery airplane and it may have gotten away from him quickly once the nose was pointed down. Obviously there could be other scenarios. Regardless, It will be interesting to see how much time he had in the TBM and how current he was. I highly suspect proficiency (in this class of high performance aircraft) will be a contributing factor. I hate to see these kinds of accidents. Keep up the great reporting and I hope your back to work flow is going well.
If you are demonetized why are they still running ads on your content? This sounds illegal, and is at best unethical practice - collecting revenue on your content while giving you nothing.
I get a kick out of the ex-military guys calling their radios "Victor 1" "Victor 2" etc, short for "VHF." Because they also use "Uniform" frequencies which are actually a bit below the UHF spectrum. Civillians tend to use terminology "Comm 1" "Comm 2" or maybe "HF 1" and "HF 2". NASA's astronauts have different words altogether: "Air to Ground 1" "Air to Ground 2" and "Teedriss" (TDRSS)... Doesn't really affect the content here, but is an interesting aspect of the aviation lexicon.
First thing I was taught in ground school by a active duty Captain F14 jockey... Nothing can be fairer than to call it pilot error. He also took me ridge soaring.
suunto61 - “Pilot error” should be the start of the investigation, not the end. This is because you if you wish to prevent reoccurrence, you need to understand the type of mistake/s so that others can be trained to avoid it.
They teach Naval Aviators to eject if they get disoriented & out-of-control below 6,000 AGL for a reason. The jet is basically lost at that point, so the crew need to eject to save themselves. Also, The safety investigation typically call it 'human factors' because there maybe other factors that led to pilot error, and crash.
This happened only 50 miles from where I live. The local news covered it immediately as it happened. I learned more from you from across the country then we will ever learn from the local news. Thank you for the service you provide.
If your local news station is like ours I'm surprised you heard anything. They usually care more about their local high school & college football teams. Don't forget Trump bashing.
Ditto from Tonawanda. Many moons ago I was dating a girl that lived on the corner of Boyce and Route 33 (Genesee St). Recognized the area immediately....
Thanks for all the details. I live 19 miles (direct) from the crash and have flown over, and driven past, the reported crash site many times in prior years. Local news reported the plane as a TBM 700. Eyewitness reports said they heard a loud whining noise, like a revving superbike, before seeing a fireball. Supposedly the largest section of the plane that remained was a 3'-4' x 1-2' piece of a wing. Such a tragedy. Hard to believe an attorney like Steve Barnes could fly enough to remain truly competent in such an aircraft.
I bet you the local news said something about the tarmac or if they had a flight plan or not? Why do they love to use incorrect terms all the time, to make themselves feel smart?
Juan... news flash.. It doesn't have to be an attorney involved in a bad crash. Any bad crash will draw out well established and experienced aviation plaintiff attorneys. Under the owners insurance policy, the liability rests with the owners insurance which will no doubt pay policy limits to the passenger. Then or in conjunction with the primary a/c policy, the attorneys will go after every entity they can think of for alleged culpability. This will drag on for years before this one runs it course. Insurance rates will continue rising anyway as those markets are recovering from a 10-15 year unseen soft market with historic lows in premiums. Granted, the last 2 years or so have not been favorable for insurors due to some bad and expensive losses. But that's not the only reason.
5:02 Just as an aside, I'm glad to see recommendations from the same channels... I love The History Guy. Have you seen the World War Two channel by TimeGhost History. They're doing a spectacular week-by-week breakdown of WW2; on 12/7 they're planning to recap the Pearl Harbor attack in real time, minute-by-minute.
There was nothing wrong with his radios...he missed a previous handoff from center then flew out of range from the one he had been talking to. This happens 50 times a day every day all over America. He had enough sense to check in with BUF approach so he wasn't hypoxic, he had to look up that freq and find it and dial it in, and he did that. I don't hear anything slurred and there is no suspicion of hypoxia in this scenario that I can see. The "error" is in ATC clearing him from FL280 down to 8,000 feet - which is an absurdly unorthodox clearance...and "that" clearance involved a phone call and controllers initials to get done. Now Mr. Barnes realizes how close he is and the 8,000 foot clearance is viewed as a crossing clearance, like somehow he has to be at 8,000 feet by the time he gets to BUF or else he will be in trouble. He didn't have enough experience to understand the ATC guy (that was being very helpful) where he said he would just box him around. This is by far the BEST help that ATC could have ever offered, and given to a seasoned pilot, would have been welcome words. ATC was saying "Hey no big deal, we will give you plenty of real estate inside BUF approach lateral confines to get you down and a nice vector for the ILS eventually, but lets get you down first." If you look at the Reno P-51 pics, you can see the failed elev trim leaving the plane and the subsequent roll and dive. This TBM airplane was VFR, and it exceeded VNE (never exceed speed) in the rush to obey ATC and with power on and nose down it will walk right through Vne and then just like the Atlas 767ER, its kinda hard to recover from that. Mr. famous lawyer did try to arrest the speed/high ROD scenario but something failed on the TBM at that point, causing the right turn and increased ROD. I'm sorry but this one is (again) pure pilot error by a rich lawyer who should have NEVER been PIC in this plane. FAA will not do anything about this category but insurance brokers have been, and are involved in going to NO QUOTE on turbine owner flown categories. BlancoLirio is 100% correct that there will be lawsuits and TBM, ATC, the FBO, PW, and everybody will all be defendants where a jury of sympathetic peers will award $25M to the family for pain and suffering and insurance will write the check. PI attorneys make a living out of making something out of nothing, they operate on fee contingent basis, and they encourage citizens to fabricate injury, damage, events so that the insurance company will settle. There is no down side to a PI firm for losing a fee contingent case. They roll the dice every time gambling their time and effort for that all important 40% of award day...which is how he got the TBM in the first place. Remember that there are four tests at work in this crooked world of ours: FAA, Insurance, Darwin, and Bernoulli. Bernoulli decides and rules instantly. Darwin may take some time to sift but is pretty consistent. Insurance responds slowly but on their own without much government guidance. FAA takes forever and will make the wrong action, make it cost more, and the action selected will have nothing to do with the problem.
The flight was IFR flight plan. KBUF metars suggest it might have been VFR on top. Loss of flight control suggests pilot error. How current was this pilot? How capable were they with handling a non-standard approach as a single pilot? One other consideration is icing, but the TBM has equipment. However, ice conditions do sneak up and surprise pilots this time of year.
@@AaronHawley We need more Inspiration, less regulation. How can we get pilots to become inspired about taking proactive self correction upon recognition of the problem. See article by Rob Mark in FLYING magazine where he asks that question (September issue Pg.40) My correspondence with FLYING indicates that they see this difference and are in prep mode for expert material coming immidiately that lean heavy on INSPIRATION. My correspondence with McSpadden at AOPA says status quo, GAJSC is all we need, and no changes are necessary. It should be noted that AOPA actually benefits from increased insurance premiums (A classic case of pure conflict of interest) because they receive a flat 10% "donation" to AOPA of all premiums collected through Assured Partners. When your insurance premium increases from $4000/year to $8,000/year...a little bell goes off at AOPA because they just went from $400/year to $800/year in free money. AOPA has no risk, no staff, and no costs in the game. Just a 10% referral "donation" See future videos concerning the state of AOPA and why it is no longer a member organization.
Dan Gryder - I have to admit, it’s so nice to read a comment like yours-regardless of content-where it’s written well, with correct spelling, punctuation, etc. Yes, your comment is speculation at this point, but damn, what a nice read. Thank you. I really wish more people wrote like you do/did. Instead of comments that are filled with miss spelled and made up words, topped off with run on sentences that don’t make a lick of sense. I always do my best to write like you do, and I don’t know if it always works. But hey, at least I try.
"They roll the dice every time gambling their time and effort for that all important 40% of award day...which is how he got the TBM in the first place." Yeah that says a lot.
The OP's comment also does a good job of indirectly making the point that a jury would need significant education and knowledge (seemingly not possible) to fairly rule in such a situation.
Juan, I just wanted to drop you a note of thanks for these clear and informative videos. I'm not a pilot or even a wannabe, but just interested in aviation, flight protocols, the science and engineering, human factors, etc. Your explanations and insights are a righteous, edifying antidote for my technical ignorance. In this sometimes complicated world, it's a real pleasure to better understand a subject that might ordinarily be out of my reach. Even when you shine a light on darker subjects--perhaps especially when the consequences are so tragic--I feel I've learned something valuable and important. Thank you.
I watch a lot of aviation channels and for the life of me I can very seldom understand the control tower when they speak. They sound like they're doing crank. Take a breath and slow down. Some pilots are the same.
Understanding ATC (Air Traffic Control) communications is an acquired skill that comes from experience. It takes years of experience to function well in an intensely busy sector like Boston. I can understand it being difficult and confusing. With exposure and experience "understand the control tower when they speak" gets easier to understand. This is another area Juan does a great job, taking the mystery out of it and explaining things well in layperson's terms.
@@apackwestbound5946 Thank you for the response. I agree, Juan is wonderful at explaining what we are hearing and looking at. It's why I like his channel going back to the Oroville Dam crisis.
On a typical flight you will come to know what should be the next communication from ATC, everything is standard unless there is a problem or weather issue. When you are ahead of the aircraft you are just waiting for the next command from ATC, turn, decent, slowdown etc.
Having had flying lessons that I had to quit due to divorce I came to the conclusion that flying is relatively straight forward if you understand how a plane flies. However navigation is a different ball game altogether! Not getting lost is very difficult! It ain't like a Sunday afternoon walk in the hills.Night flying has always fascinated me! Cheers.
Sad hey both died, the young woman passenger in particular. Even before Juan said it, I thought now her family will sue his estate, using a big law firm, and his law firm will contest. They'll both sue the radio manufacturer, the company that did the last service, Buffalo ATC, the firm that sold him the aircraft and the guy who cleans the floor in the hanger. The law firms will make hundreds of thousands of dollars, the families will get millions of dollars, and subsequent generations of nieces and nephews will be trust fund educated (and become lawyers). And every Christmas at family gatherings they'll raise a toast to their dead uncle and aunt who paid for it all by dying in a plane crash.
Retired ATC'er here, I started in a level II VFR tower, it didn't take long to learn that Doctors and Lawyers tend to be preoccupied, think they are infallible and operating a AC is a simple thing.
First of all, my thought go to the family. My respects. Having grown up in aviation industry, I fully understand the lawyer part. I remember my father explaining the decrease in Cessna, Piper, Beech etc sales with the lawsuits. They sue the manufacturer of the aircraft, the fuel, the oil. Everyone. Remember how the insurance costs "killed" GA.
@@larryfisher7056 Does the experiment address Judges who hire lawyers to keep prosecuting after the prosecution has dropped charges... would save the taxpayers billions...
seems like hypoxia or something, the way he just turned for the airport and just flew straight into the ground like that. seems like very rudimentary and basic decision making like you have lost a lot of useful brain power or something. who knows maybe the reason he couldnt reach anyone on the radio is just because he forgot how to work it. Smarter every day youtube channel did a video on what its like going hypoxic and its really crazy how useless you become up high with no oxygen.
TBM800 is pressurized. If the cabin pressure was lost at FL280, the pilot would have passed out a long time ago and unable to talk to Buffalo approach as we heard on this ATC recording.
r64g my thoughts exactly , bo you recall the man from ROCHESTER NY, years ago, as I recall pressurization is set on one of the GARMEN SCREENS, which he never set, then asked for 20.000ft ? which should be like 10 000, they did pass out, then overflow destination until ran out of fuel, off JAMAICA ,.THE new TBM, this is now AUTOMATIC . RIP , 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Like your new glasses Juan, they look good on you. They will look even better in that 777 cockpit. Thank you for all the effort you put into your informative videos.
Commercial Helo and former military pilot here...sounds like a classic right handed graveyard spin. Go off auto pilot with slight turn and inner ear tells you that you are straight and level...when you are actually turning and descending. I had an instructor do that to me with an emergency panel (no Art. Horizon) and no comms. It is a scary feeling when you realize your in a bad descending turn and when you try and correct it, your brain and body scream at you that you are wrong...put it back the way it was! It can get out of control in 15 seconds. This is where the phrase, "Trust your instruments," comes from. They will probably find this guy had low time IFR experience and flying the Lamborghini model of a private aircraft. Very unfortunate. Hope some good can eventually come of this. Condolences to his family.
I am not a pilot, so here's my question. In flying VFR in the daytime, pilots look out of the window for attitude control, but it would seem that pilots would also glance at the instruments occasionally to get an idea of how they reacted to various changes in the attitude of the aircraft so in time a pilot would learn to trust his instruments intuitively and disregard what his inner ear was telling him. I know that as the aviation field grew, new instruments were added to the aircraft and the pilots just learned to use them over time. What am I missing here? Thank you.
@@blancolirio ouch...didn't realize he was in VFR conditions. Well, that adds quite a bunch to the investigation. Payne Stewart hypoxia or some sort of medical issue? This will be tough unless they find a mechanical issue...which is unlikely since all signs point to him being way behind in the aircraft. Back to you Mr. Blancolirio...
@@monkeyboy4746 Hey...you are not missing anything...I didn't realize he was in VFR conditions. Which means daytime and can see fine. He was flying an IFR flight plan due to the flight levels but could see outside...I did not realize that...which adds real mystery to the crash. You are correct though, if you are flying instruments in the daytime, you can look outside and immediately get your orientation...unless in the clouds or strange VFR on top of clouds.
monkeyboy4746 - This comes down to training. When VFR the only gyroscopic instrument of any use is the heading indicator. The rest are not required. When flying solely on instruments you MUST trust the gyro instruments TOTALLY. The toughest time is when you transition from visual to instrument flying (and back) in poor visibility. A commercial airliner typically has three attitude displays. Only when one disagrees with another do you start to ignore their indications. In small aircraft you compare one set of instruments with another to confirm that you are being supplied with valid information. The reality is your life depends on the quality of your initial and recurrent training.
i have said this before but I will say it again, this is a case of people with a lot of excess money and big egos buying expensive air planes that they don not have enough training and experience to safely fly but their egos tell them that they can. There is an old saying that goes like this, "what goes up must come down". As the person in control of the air plane once you get it into the air you must be prepared for it's eventual return to earth. The laws of gravity have not been repealed.
Very tragic what played out here. It’s painfully obvious he was not fully aware of what was going on. He failed to follow basic radio protocol by not acknowledging ATC instructions. Just his call sign back to them. Sounds like hypoxia or some other impairment. On TBM’s he would have simply updated autopilot with descend to altitude and heading...appears he turned off autopilot and lost control of the plane almost immediately. Truly sad.
Tragic.. I’m sure any ATC who last communicates with any stricken airplane has trouble sleeping that night. ‘...how do you read..’ those somber words said. They train for this scenario, but it never becomes routine. RIP the barrister and his niece.
Ken Clark Most people that have compassion, may. Just working in an ER and having a trauma or arrest before the end of ones shift, can leave one staring at the ceiling when in bed unable to fall asleep, after an evening shift. Adrenaline, and thinking of the other person, factors in. I am not sure what your career is, nor do I understand your comment.
The pilot was Stephen Barnes of Cellino & Barnes injury attorneys. Very reputable lawyer in the NY area. I can remember Their tv commercial jingle for 20 years now.
FAA does not fly the airplane. Do whatever you have to do to stay alive and the rest can be discussed on the ground. This is starting to look like a rich lawyer error.
Juan, very interesting analysis of the progression of events. I learned a lot of pilot stuff here. Pilot duty is very structured and for good cause. There are a lot of rules to follow because there is a lot of risk to manage. The rules are based on logical actions to keep everyone safe. When I was much younger I always thought piloting would be really cool because I love the visual perspective from the air. It wasn't so much about idea of being a pilot per se, but more about my love for the outdoors and the view of landscape with all its attributes. When I saw how much time and money to get a license, I never pursued it. I realized it would be a sustained major commitment of time to qualify and retain the pilot privilege... I spent my free time and money biking instead. It's so nice to have you review all this stuff, since it's your profession and post it for me to understand the intricacies of piloting and disasters. Thanks!
ATC: "Stop your descent, level your wings, maintain any altitude." Is that anything like a common ATC instruction? Or is this controller trying anything he can think of to help this pilot? Seems remarkable to me.
The thought process is probably something like: I can't figure out the problem for him and I can't fix anything mechanical from here - so on the off chance it's medical, I need to somehow keep him flying with simple instructions. [And "medical" can be anything from hypoxia to a stroke to a blackout to spatial disorientiation, etc...]
Not standard ATC communication. The controller at this point probably knew that something was wrong, as there was no response from the aircraft, after numerous attempts by the controller, to establish radio contact.
Last radar data, if I saw it correctly, showed 440 knots at 11,300 feet. Now that is ground track speed...the speed over the ground, right? That's more like fighter-jet speed at that altitude, isn't it? Probably faster than a P-51D at full power. It looks like it descended from about 18,000 feet to 11,300 feet in 35 seconds. So, about 11,500 feet/min. 113 knots vertical speed. About 454 knots true airspeed in a 14-degree dive angle...if I calculated right and if the data is accurate (big if). Did part of one wing come off? Was the plane overstressed by the pilot when he was initially told to stop descent going about 330 knots at about 18000 feet? And then, perhaps, missing part of one wing it veered to the right and entered a spiraling dive? (highly speculative, there) I think they may find parts of the aircraft miles from the crash site. The radar track made an abrupt right, nearly 90-degree turn and into a dive. But, I could be wrong...and probably am wrong.
The TBM 850 spec sheet shows a Vmo (maximum operating speed) for the aircraft is 271 KCAS (calibrated airspeed in knots). At 7:14 in your video the data shows a ground speed of 446 kts. Did this pilot rip the empennage off of the plane trying to get down too fast?
Same plane was damaged when it porpoised multiple times at KBUF in 2019. Another indication of lack of experience in such a high performance plane. To me it bolsters pilot error.
@@DavidDavid-jb1cy All of Juan's other videos on aircraft accidents have been demonetized. That's why this one was a surprise. They'll probably demonetize it later.
The pilot did not follow radio rules...when handed off he should have kept radio 2 on the old freq and radio 1 to whatever he thought was the assigned freg and leap frog your radio as needed....or at least just kept 1 radio on 121.5. As an ISL rated pilot he should have know as he was about 100 miles out that he would be given decent instructions soon, when at 70 miles from his landing point, he should have been calling center to find out why he has not. Pilot error, failure to maintain flight control and procedures.
ekbusdriver Damn right! If I flew 9 hours in ONE month, I would feel rusty on not at all proficient and I’m a pilot at Fedex! That guy needed a lot for experience, recent experience and training. Sad.
The Cellino & Barnes jingle plays after NYC metro traffic reports to the point where at least half the population prob has it memorized. My condolences to the families and especially thoughts go out to the ATC controllers involved. Unfortunate but everyone will need to lawyer up on this one.
Sounds to me like he got " behind the aurcraft " because he had trouble with the nav/radio systems. At 300TAS, things happen very fast and if your not ready ( or properly trained ) with your onboard systems , things like this will happen,
Thank you Juan, I've been hoping you'd provide a video on this accident. I read an article in the Buffalo News earlier where Richard Barnes, the dad to the passenger Elizabeth and brother to the pilot talks about his grief after learning from others in their law firm that his brothers plane went down and he had to tell those people that his daughter was also onboard. Thanks again for your reporting. Thoughts and prayers to all the family members friends connected to this accident.
play those last few minutes and watch SPEED only..... I think he might have ripped it apart trying to descend fast, too fast, maybe the tail will be found a long ways away from the main wreckage?
I was wondering the same sort of thing about a wing ... starts the descent entirely too fast and speed climbing, then rate of descent increases sharply and speed increase does so as well. There's also that sudden apparent turn to the right...
One minor correction: Juan said at the beginning "prominent NYC attorney" which is incorrect. While they have NYC area offices, they are actually based in Buffalo in WNY.
ATC did not say anything that required a read back, so acknowledgment with only the call sign was good, and actually helps cut back on all the useless BS some pilots spew on transmissions.
I once was listening to ATC while plane spotting at an airport. I heard a pilot from a major airline say, “I’m confused. I think I misunderstood something and aren’t doing what you told me to. I’m on heading _x_ and at _y_ feet. What are you expecting?” I’m paraphrasing as it was many years ago when I started my flight training. It helped me a lot to hear an experienced pilot admit he was unsure of the situation and fess up that he may of made a mistake.
Thanks Juan. I was wondering what was going on with the pilot, as he seemed unconcerned and not forthcoming. I suspect hypoxia, gauging by his inadequate responses.
I don't like to speculate, however if it was due to hypoxia, I seem to remember another TBM hypoxia accident (which was brand new at the time) a few years ago. I believe it was a husband and wife enroute to Florida from NY and eventually the plane went down after fuel was exhausted.
Hypoxia seems unlikely. Once you're knocked out, you're likely not coming back unless you get to a lower altitude (or get on oxygen). And if you do, you aren't forming coherent sentences.
@McFarland I'm using the app for android and another trick that works is play the last few seconds of the video and after it ends you watch it add free
"Demonetized" doesn't mean that RUclips doesn't play ads; it means that Juan doesn't receive any income from those ads. RUclips is quite happy to profit from topics that they think the creator shouldn't profit from. Bit of a double standard.
@@lizj5740 I always let one or two ads play to drive some revenue to the creator but lately its non stop negative political ads so I just lower the volume let them play and go to the bathroom or something for a few minutes then come back a watch the full video
@@MikeBova1 Perhaps the political ads are US-centric. I get ads for powdering gentlemen's private parts, Grammarly, and some online investment program. Usually, they can be turned off after 5 seconds.
I could never be a pilot for this reason: how the blazes anyone understands each other on comm is beyond me. Anyway, from all the crash simulations I've seen, distraction is the main reason for accidents. By distraction, I mean fixation on a single issue with disregard for all others. Then again, his could have been a medical emergency. I feel sorry for his niece.
The audio you hear is often captured by amateur equipment. Very much appreciated but it’s not what a pilot hears, particularly when wearing a headset. And a lot of it is an acquired talent. You get accustomed to it.
As Raoul says, the audio you hear on RUclips does not represent the actual quality. Also, we know the lingo. We can always ask for clarification if we do not understand something.
Agreed. I find aviation fascinating, but despite protestations of how "safe" private aviation is, I believe there are too many things that can go wrong unexpectedly, and gravity will kill you _every_ time if you are more than about 50ft off the ground. A neighbour tried to persuade me to take my daughter in a flight in the plane that she and her husband owned, and I politely declined. A few months later that neighbour turned the trainer she was flying into a ball of scrap metal (literally folded up the wings) in a crash landing. She was lucky to walk away (I guess that made it a "good" landing, not a "great" one! :-/), but she was still hospitalized and needed surgery for several fractures to her face/ eye socket.
@@tomcorwine3091 Yeah, okay, however the thought comes to mind that perhaps pilots may think they heard an instruction when they really didn't. I won't get on a plane anymore, so this has nothing to do with me personally.
Cellino and Barns was also well known injury Attorneys in the Greater Los Angeles Area and The San Francisco Bay Area for their TV commercials before the breakup of the law firm.
Juan the 850 is a slick plane and he obviously got well behind the plane. I am wondering with his what looks like little time in that aircraft what really happened with those radios. Did he mess it up himself or was there indeed an issue. As a pilot who routinely flies single pilot IFR on part 135 I keep 121.5 in comm 2 all the time like you said and it is a good plan. Will be interesting to see what comes of this
I'm a instrument, multi engine rated pilot. Lots of experience is important, and many part time pilots don't have enough flying time in a type of plane like this. We probably remember the Kennedy who took a flight over water to an airport near the coast of New England. You had to shake your head, that with his lack of making such a flight was a terrible idea. I'm not sure he was even instrument rated.
Not only when they crash, but when ambulance chasers lock onto a GA crash. Started way back in the '70s. Extremely high rate of pilot error accidents that resulted in litigation against manufacturers. Greedy lawyers killed the GA affordable aircraft market.
HoundDogMech---not sure about the replacement relevance, but $25K in 1977 is $130K in today's $. A new 172 IFR equipped is well over $300K. Product liability lawsuits (which actually have been throttled back a bit by courts) account for much of that $170K difference.
@@tenpiloto talk about dollar value first lesson in june of '7 was $10/ hr wet tach time in a 4 seat Aero Commander Darter and $5 for the instructor. I was making $2/hr so I had to work 10 hours for 1 hour of instruction.
These accidents keep happening and are going to drive insurance costs through the roof. This could be a medical, hypoxia, or could be loss of control. We don't know what the weather was but if he was in IMC and took the TBM off autopilot because of the rapid descent needed maybe he just got disoriented and lost control? We need to know how many hours he had in the aircraft and how much time in actual IFR conditions.
Too much plane for him, and it just got away from him? I’ve been flying for over 50 years, now retired, and the first thing you do when you haven’t heard from center for awhile is start chatting with whoever you can reach on the radio. Then get back to the correct freq. The fact that he said everything is fine is odd, then he stopped communicating again? Guess it’s up to the NTSB to sort through this one.
A friend of my family who flew F-14's in the Navy has the exact same plane. He told me once after flying it for couple of months that you couldn't let yourself fall behind the aircraft.
Here in the SF Bay Area, we get a lot of TV ads trolling for victims of Boy Scout molestations and "cancer from Roundup." Oh, and let's not forget getting uterine cancer from Johnson & Johnson talcum powder. These cretins will crawl under any rock they can find looking for hidden riches. No sympathy.
Celleno and Barnes just went through a messy firm breakup. Also at one point Cellino lost their legal bar license for 6 months. Very very well know across NYS with their commercials and 888-8888 number
Is there any similarity to this sort of thing and inexperienced motorcycle riders getting big fast sports bikes. They can go too fast to keep up with unless you have experienced it, a lot.
The NTSB said they will not send investigators to the crash seen due the COVID 19 concerns. There are some COVID hot spots in the state but not in the area of the crash seen.
No need to ident. He had them on the radar already. You can tell because the controller knows his altitude and knows the wings aren’t level. Ident is used so the controller can find the plane on his screen.
Identing can be used to acknowledge transmissions from ATC when the pilot is able to hear the controller but cannot transmit back to them. For instance “TBM 5DM if you hear Boston Center ident”. If the pilot then idents the controller can issue instructions and the pilot can acknowledge them by identing.
the opening Utube ad about "joinhoney" just about blew the earwax out of my head. where do they FIND these young people with voices that can break 3/4 plate GLASS???
Great reporting one. Everybody turns to you for accurate information. It’s a little weird but I think all pilots hope that you will cover any accident that they’re involved in so that the truth is out there. I wonder if you could do something on the great ag pilot Randy Berry Who was killed in a crash on the job recently.
I still CAN NOT get over this one!!!! Very Sad. Randy had over 40,000 hrs. His business was doing really well, I've heard. I sure hope his wife will be able to hold the business together, as they both have worked so, so hard over the years. I still can't believe it. Sad man, Sad!!!!!
This is why the insurance rates on owner-flown turbo props and jets has recently tripled. Recommendation: Professional grade aircraft should be flown by a professional pilot. No disrespect intended to the PIC of the accident aircraft.
Total time is not nearly as important as recent experience and recent training. High time pilots have crashed aircraft because they simply didn’t fly the plane.
Thanks for the great analysis. I fly a TBM and the plane can descent at a high rate of speed, like 6000' per minute, safely as long as the engine is idle and the speed is properly monitored. The big prop acts as an airbrake. This and being unresponsive on radio, I suspect hypoxia was a factor. Apparently he did not read back properly when asked to descent maintain 8000 (unless this was cut during editing). If he was lacking oxygen, it is possible that he started the descent with cruise power. That would overspeed the airframe quickly.
The ATClive recordings are usually people feeding a scanner radio into the internet - so the radio could have been scanning through channels til it stopped on Barnes' last transmission. He sounded fairly business like and to the point in the recording. My guess is he wasn't watching air speed on his 5,000 fpm descent from 28,000.
Such a waste. I wonder what caused him to get so far behind the airplane. It's obvious he was behind the curve by the time radio contact was re-established. Maybe changed to wrong frequency (say from center to approach) and then just never caught up. Wow, almost 7000 ft/min descent. We'll see. As to the lawyer comments, I remember reading articles from as far back as the 1960's and '70s claiming that doctors and lawyers seemed to take more chances than other demographics. Thanks, Juan, for the usual great coverage!
Thanks Juan. Like stated below, how can RUclips run adverts during a video of such content but demonetise the channel posting it ? Hopefully a Lawyer might want to pursue them for profiteering through someone's death ?
As usual, compelling stuff, well presented, Juan. RUclips (Google) probably has enough money to pay everyone on earth. Generously compensating those who present original and popular content here should be a given. Best regards
A very strange one. If he'd tried to land but was too hot and high that would be one thing, but he was nowhere near the runway. Constant lack of communications response, does any pilot deliberately ignore ATC? At the very least that's going to get you in serious licence threatening trouble.
Just curious as to your premiums in the US? We have a few decent companies here in the UK. Visi Cover is the one most people I know use. My last premium on a PA28 was £450/yr for private use. When a friend flew it, i just went online and popped his details inl times, currency etc and there was no charge. Another low time pilot(Circa 100 hrs) Was only £30 to put him on for the duration of the policy. A plane in the 210 class usually costs around £1200/yr. But your fuel will save over ££6000/yr, (£60/hr x 200 hrs in the UK)so it's swings and roundabouts?
As a non-pilot who has however flown in light aircraft a lot, I can't believe how poor the diction is of some ATC people. In an occupation where almost the only quality required is verbal aptitude, much of the information given to this pilot and in others that I have listened to, was so rushed and un-nuanced as to be almost useless in a highly stressed situation.
I’m a doctor and we suffer from the same disease as lawyers- I’m a great doctor/lawyer therefore I’m a great pilot”- it just don’t work that way unfortunately
Another analogy a top tennis player who practices and plays nearly every day, thinks they can become a really good gymnast with only two or three hours of practice a month. At the gym they try a too difficult move on the beam...
Good for you! I wish many of students thought like you!
You are so right
Always a pleasure to watch and listen to your analysis. Sad accident. Hopefully something to learn from it. Thanks, Juan.
As a subscriber to both of your channels its really cool that you're fine with Juan using your content as the collaboration really helps in understanding what happened. Thanks for doing what you do.
Yes!
Thanks Victor!
I'm "Old School ie; I learned flying from that.
Fast forward 4+ decades,
I respect & learn f/ both your channels,We learn f/others mistakes it's retention of those & application if & when a need arises,.I've had my share, yet there's still tomorrow. .Stay calm ..and FLY THE AIRPLANE, after all..in the end..that's ALL that really matters.Thanks & Hand shakes to you both. and Thanks for the great content ,Old low timers.
@@blancolirio what about the failure of his radio? You say he could still land while following some rules. How would someone know those rules in the event of radio failure? Is that well known to a pilot? What do you make of the sudden break to the right? Someone else speculated that something malfunctioning on the plane could have caused that.
@@theetruth4267 If he is an IFR rated pilot (which he was) he 2ould know these rules.
When RUclips demonetises a video I really hope they stop all adverts on that post as well.
They don't. This one had two commercials.
@@charcounsel4432 robbing bar stewards :-(
Call a lawyer, quick! YT is making money of off Juan!
@@18robsmith *"When RUclips demonetises a video I really hope they stop all adverts on that post as well"*
Rob do you still believe in the Tooth Fairy too? Just as the privileged say "It is laws for thee but not for me!" ThemTube says it is demonetisation for thee but not for me!
YT wants their money and yours. Easy Peesy
In reference to Bobby Garcia ......... I highly recommend that any attorney or doctor group that needs an aircraft for business, hire a professional pilot to fly your aircraft. If you can afford a multi million dollar aircraft, pay $50 to $100K per year for a pilot to get you to and from home safely. Even if you want to fly your own plane, great. Just hire a safety pilot to fly in the right seat as an insurance policy.
I had many guys hire me as a safety pilot before my airline days... those were my scariest most hated jobs... would have been easier to just fly and be PIC instead of instructing someone on a CJ3 going into a busy terminal area... realizing the person in the left seat has no reason being in that seat... just hire a pro or two and sit in the back and drink..
Even if your ego won't allow you to take instructions from a SIC, sometime hire a pro pilot and just sit in the right seat and watch the pro.
See how he plans ahead. Compare his planning techniques to yours.
Ego , Ego and mo EGO
🎯
The more I learn the more complicated it seems. Pilots have a so many responsibilities that they are required to calmly do almost automatically without errors. Just AMAZING!!!!! Great reporting as usual JB
re: "The more I learn the more complicated it seems." that's because it IS complicated (very) and let no one tell you different. combine Dunning-Kruger with a "bleeding edge" aircraft like the TBM and situation complexity amplifies by a factor of 10.
4:17 "Yes sir, everything's fine; TBM 965DM"
Oh how those words would very quickly come back to bite him.
macmedic892 agreed, but, also the odd part.
Maybe he knew something was wrong and he didn't want to scare his niece? One of my first thoughts when I've heard that.
@@nikovbn839 I highly doubt it.
He could be embarrassed by the situation he found himself in?
The pilot sounded evasive to me in his communications. I was taught to prioritize Skin, Tin, Ticket , in that order when dealing with an inflight incident. There may have been nothing ATC could do to help, but if you don’t ask.... Minimally, they can reduce your workload so you can concentrate on the problem by being honest with them. Can’t do that if you are worrying about your Ticket.
I so much appreciate having found both your and Victor’s channel - almost at the same time, about a year ago - because between the two of you one gets the best information, delivered in the best and professional way possible, and with heart too. So glad to see two such great channels collaborating (or at least that you Juan is using Victor’s great content while giving us the explanations for what’s happening and/or your thoughts on it).
Thank you, you really are one of the best channels on YT.
You missed the Oroville dam thing, then. Juan turned out to be the most accurate and sensible source of news on that.
@@hamletksquid2702 I did! I found Juan through my aviation interest, and found he has so much other interesting content as well. It's funny how ppl has found his channel bc of different things!
I'm not American, though, I live in Sweden, and I didn't know the first thing about the area around Oroville. Now I do, I little, lol. I have a close friend in SoCal, but his area has thankfully not been as affected by the fires. They mostly have smaller fires during the season.
Anyway, yeah I missed his reporting on the dam, but everything he talks about is interesting even though my main focus is aviation!
Great reporting Juan, Thank You. When this lawyer crashed he had issues.
7:27 the speed is spiky because it's calculated by multilateration (not ADS-B). Note the text "FlightAware MLAT" near the cursor.
VASAviation and your annotations make for a really insightful video - again. Thanks to both of you.
Thanks Juan, Great Update. Sounds like a true accident where a pilot was operating well outside his skills and knowledge, thanks
Thanks Juan. Tragic sequence of events. You do have to wonder what was going on in the background that caused the pilot to lose and have difficulty re-establishing comms with ATC. Physiological, pressurization or just distraction? The pilot sounded reasonably aware when he talked to ATC. Things clearly unraveled quickly once he started the descent from FL280. If I had to speculate, it would be that when the controller advised the pilot to continue direct to the airport (rather than a vector as he requested) he may not have understood what the controller had in mind and felt like he had to expedite the descent due to how close he was to the airport by that point. I can see a scenario where he disconnected the autopilot as a fast way to initiate the descent or it accidentally tripped off. The TBM is a slippery airplane and it may have gotten away from him quickly once the nose was pointed down. Obviously there could be other scenarios. Regardless, It will be interesting to see how much time he had in the TBM and how current he was. I highly suspect proficiency (in this class of high performance aircraft) will be a contributing factor. I hate to see these kinds of accidents.
Keep up the great reporting and I hope your back to work flow is going well.
Thank you Juan. Good point about the lawyers! Great report!
If you are demonetized why are they still running ads on your content? This sounds illegal, and is at best unethical practice - collecting revenue on your content while giving you nothing.
Use Ad Block Plus
Typical RUclips behavior. Nothing to see here.
...just...don't...click...
TwoSwedes Google does what ever they want including censoring videos.
I get a kick out of the ex-military guys calling their radios "Victor 1" "Victor 2" etc, short for "VHF." Because they also use "Uniform" frequencies which are actually a bit below the UHF spectrum.
Civillians tend to use terminology "Comm 1" "Comm 2" or maybe "HF 1" and "HF 2".
NASA's astronauts have different words altogether: "Air to Ground 1" "Air to Ground 2" and "Teedriss" (TDRSS)...
Doesn't really affect the content here, but is an interesting aspect of the aviation lexicon.
Yep, had an ex-mil copilot do that to me once. "Ground is on Victor 1", "What? (thinks about it for 2 seconds)...oh, got it."
First thing I was taught in ground school by a active duty Captain F14 jockey... Nothing can be fairer than to call it pilot error. He also took me ridge soaring.
suunto61 - “Pilot error” should be the start of the investigation, not the end. This is because you if you wish to prevent reoccurrence, you need to understand the type of mistake/s so that others can be trained to avoid it.
@@Trevor_Austin let's be honest, there is a 99.9999999999% chance the NTSB report concludes "pilot error"
They teach Naval Aviators to eject if they get disoriented & out-of-control below 6,000 AGL for a reason. The jet is basically lost at that point, so the crew need to eject to save themselves. Also, The safety investigation typically call it 'human factors' because there maybe other factors that led to pilot error, and crash.
New beard, new haircut, new glasses...... off to work I go ;-)
To tell us where the bear shit in the buckwheat.
I think its a filter. It looks like one anyways which is comical from such a stoic all business type dude.
This happened only 50 miles from where I live. The local news covered it immediately as it happened. I learned more from you from across the country then we will ever learn from the local news. Thank you for the service you provide.
Ditto..... Amherst
If your local news station is like ours I'm surprised you heard anything. They usually care more about their local high school & college football teams. Don't forget Trump bashing.
Ditto from Tonawanda. Many moons ago I was dating a girl that lived on the corner of Boyce and Route 33 (Genesee St). Recognized the area immediately....
Thanks for all the details. I live 19 miles (direct) from the crash and have flown over, and driven past, the reported crash site many times in prior years. Local news reported the plane as a TBM 700. Eyewitness reports said they heard a loud whining noise, like a revving superbike, before seeing a fireball. Supposedly the largest section of the plane that remained was a 3'-4' x 1-2' piece of a wing. Such a tragedy. Hard to believe an attorney like Steve Barnes could fly enough to remain truly competent in such an aircraft.
I bet you the local news said something about the tarmac or if they had a flight plan or not? Why do they love to use incorrect terms all the time, to make themselves feel smart?
Juan... news flash.. It doesn't have to be an attorney involved in a bad crash. Any bad crash will draw out well established and experienced aviation plaintiff attorneys. Under the owners insurance policy, the liability rests with the owners insurance which will no doubt pay policy limits to the passenger. Then or in conjunction with the primary a/c policy, the attorneys will go after every entity they can think of for alleged culpability. This will drag on for years before this one runs it course. Insurance rates will continue rising anyway as those markets are recovering from a 10-15 year unseen soft market with historic lows in premiums. Granted, the last 2 years or so have not been favorable for insurors due to some bad and expensive losses. But that's not the only reason.
5:02 Just as an aside, I'm glad to see recommendations from the same channels... I love The History Guy. Have you seen the World War Two channel by TimeGhost History. They're doing a spectacular week-by-week breakdown of WW2; on 12/7 they're planning to recap the Pearl Harbor attack in real time, minute-by-minute.
There was nothing wrong with his radios...he missed a previous handoff from center then flew out of range from the one he had been talking to. This happens 50 times a day every day all over America. He had enough sense to check in with BUF approach so he wasn't hypoxic, he had to look up that freq and find it and dial it in, and he did that. I don't hear anything slurred and there is no suspicion of hypoxia in this scenario that I can see. The "error" is in ATC clearing him from FL280 down to 8,000 feet - which is an absurdly unorthodox clearance...and "that" clearance involved a phone call and controllers initials to get done. Now Mr. Barnes realizes how close he is and the 8,000 foot clearance is viewed as a crossing clearance, like somehow he has to be at 8,000 feet by the time he gets to BUF or else he will be in trouble. He didn't have enough experience to understand the ATC guy (that was being very helpful) where he said he would just box him around. This is by far the BEST help that ATC could have ever offered, and given to a seasoned pilot, would have been welcome words. ATC was saying "Hey no big deal, we will give you plenty of real estate inside BUF approach lateral confines to get you down and a nice vector for the ILS eventually, but lets get you down first." If you look at the Reno P-51 pics, you can see the failed elev trim leaving the plane and the subsequent roll and dive. This TBM airplane was VFR, and it exceeded VNE (never exceed speed) in the rush to obey ATC and with power on and nose down it will walk right through Vne and then just like the Atlas 767ER, its kinda hard to recover from that. Mr. famous lawyer did try to arrest the speed/high ROD scenario but something failed on the TBM at that point, causing the right turn and increased ROD. I'm sorry but this one is (again) pure pilot error by a rich lawyer who should have NEVER been PIC in this plane. FAA will not do anything about this category but insurance brokers have been, and are involved in going to NO QUOTE on turbine owner flown categories. BlancoLirio is 100% correct that there will be lawsuits and TBM, ATC, the FBO, PW, and everybody will all be defendants where a jury of sympathetic peers will award $25M to the family for pain and suffering and insurance will write the check. PI attorneys make a living out of making something out of nothing, they operate on fee contingent basis, and they encourage citizens to fabricate injury, damage, events so that the insurance company will settle. There is no down side to a PI firm for losing a fee contingent case. They roll the dice every time gambling their time and effort for that all important 40% of award day...which is how he got the TBM in the first place. Remember that there are four tests at work in this crooked world of ours: FAA, Insurance, Darwin, and Bernoulli. Bernoulli decides and rules instantly. Darwin may take some time to sift but is pretty consistent. Insurance responds slowly but on their own without much government guidance. FAA takes forever and will make the wrong action, make it cost more, and the action selected will have nothing to do with the problem.
The flight was IFR flight plan. KBUF metars suggest it might have been VFR on top. Loss of flight control suggests pilot error. How current was this pilot? How capable were they with handling a non-standard approach as a single pilot? One other consideration is icing, but the TBM has equipment. However, ice conditions do sneak up and surprise pilots this time of year.
@@AaronHawley We need more Inspiration, less regulation. How can we get pilots to become inspired about taking proactive self correction upon recognition of the problem. See article by Rob Mark in FLYING magazine where he asks that question (September issue Pg.40) My correspondence with FLYING indicates that they see this difference and are in prep mode for expert material coming immidiately that lean heavy on INSPIRATION. My correspondence with McSpadden at AOPA says status quo, GAJSC is all we need, and no changes are necessary. It should be noted that AOPA actually benefits from increased insurance premiums (A classic case of pure conflict of interest) because they receive a flat 10% "donation" to AOPA of all premiums collected through Assured Partners. When your insurance premium increases from $4000/year to $8,000/year...a little bell goes off at AOPA because they just went from $400/year to $800/year in free money. AOPA has no risk, no staff, and no costs in the game. Just a 10% referral "donation" See future videos concerning the state of AOPA and why it is no longer a member organization.
Dan Gryder - I have to admit, it’s so nice to read a comment like yours-regardless of content-where it’s written well, with correct spelling, punctuation, etc. Yes, your comment is speculation at this point, but damn, what a nice read. Thank you. I really wish more people wrote like you do/did. Instead of comments that are filled with miss spelled and made up words, topped off with run on sentences that don’t make a lick of sense. I always do my best to write like you do, and I don’t know if it always works. But hey, at least I try.
"They roll the dice every time gambling their time and effort for that all important 40% of award day...which is how he got the TBM in the first place." Yeah that says a lot.
The OP's comment also does a good job of indirectly making the point that a jury would need significant education and knowledge (seemingly not possible) to fairly rule in such a situation.
Juan, I just wanted to drop you a note of thanks for these clear and informative videos. I'm not a pilot or even a wannabe, but just interested in aviation, flight protocols, the science and engineering, human factors, etc. Your explanations and insights are a righteous, edifying antidote for my technical ignorance. In this sometimes complicated world, it's a real pleasure to better understand a subject that might ordinarily be out of my reach. Even when you shine a light on darker subjects--perhaps especially when the consequences are so tragic--I feel I've learned something valuable and important. Thank you.
Same here !!
I watch a lot of aviation channels and for the life of me I can very seldom understand the control tower when they speak. They sound like they're doing crank. Take a breath and slow down. Some pilots are the same.
Understanding ATC (Air Traffic Control) communications is an acquired skill that comes from experience. It takes years of experience to function well in an intensely busy sector like Boston. I can understand it being difficult and confusing. With exposure and experience "understand the control tower when they speak" gets easier to understand. This is another area Juan does a great job, taking the mystery out of it and explaining things well in layperson's terms.
@@apackwestbound5946 Thank you for the response. I agree, Juan is wonderful at explaining what we are hearing and looking at. It's why I like his channel going back to the Oroville Dam crisis.
Thanks for saying this. I was thinking I’m the only one having difficulty. 🧐
@@stevet8121 Also, the audio quality of LiveATC.net is not the greatest. The actual ATC audio inside the cockpit is MUCH clearer.
On a typical flight you will come to know what should be the next communication from ATC, everything is standard unless there is a problem or weather issue. When you are ahead of the aircraft you are just waiting for the next command from ATC, turn, decent, slowdown etc.
Having had flying lessons that I had to quit due to divorce I came to the conclusion that flying is relatively straight forward if you understand how a plane flies. However navigation is a different ball game altogether! Not getting lost is very difficult! It ain't like a Sunday afternoon walk in the hills.Night flying has always fascinated me! Cheers.
"Stop your decent, level your wings, maintain any altitude" OMG, that's haunting. The controller knew.
he can see the rate of decent. It was not a secret.
They are trained to say that.
Juan, Thanks for the 121.5 comment on comm 2. I fly single IFR all the time and nobody, including instructors has ever mentioned this. It makes sense.
Sad hey both died, the young woman passenger in particular. Even before Juan said it, I thought now her family will sue his estate, using a big law firm, and his law firm will contest. They'll both sue the radio manufacturer, the company that did the last service, Buffalo ATC, the firm that sold him the aircraft and the guy who cleans the floor in the hanger. The law firms will make hundreds of thousands of dollars, the families will get millions of dollars, and subsequent generations of nieces and nephews will be trust fund educated (and become lawyers). And every Christmas at family gatherings they'll raise a toast to their dead uncle and aunt who paid for it all by dying in a plane crash.
WRONG! The law firms will make millions also.
Retired ATC'er here, I started in a level II VFR tower, it didn't take long to learn that Doctors and Lawyers tend to be preoccupied, think they are infallible and operating a AC is a simple thing.
First of all, my thought go to the family. My respects.
Having grown up in aviation industry, I fully understand the lawyer part. I remember my father explaining the decrease in Cessna, Piper, Beech etc sales with the lawsuits. They sue the manufacturer of the aircraft, the fuel, the oil. Everyone. Remember how the insurance costs "killed" GA.
"Losing party pays" is the law of the land in most countries other than the USA.
@@UncleKennysPlace I'm from Sweden.
@@UncleKennysPlace Frank Herbert"s "Dosadi Experiment"...the losing lawyer is executed.....cuts down on frivolous law suits....
@@larryfisher7056 Does the experiment address Judges who hire lawyers to keep prosecuting after the prosecution has dropped charges... would save the taxpayers billions...
@@davidkitting6676 Amen.
seems like hypoxia or something, the way he just turned for the airport and just flew straight into the ground like that. seems like very rudimentary and basic decision making like you have lost a lot of useful brain power or something. who knows maybe the reason he couldnt reach anyone on the radio is just because he forgot how to work it. Smarter every day youtube channel did a video on what its like going hypoxic and its really crazy how useless you become up high with no oxygen.
TBM800 is pressurized. If the cabin pressure was lost at FL280, the pilot would have passed out a long time ago and unable to talk to Buffalo approach as we heard on this ATC recording.
@@r64g Could have been a partial loss of pressurization?
r64g my thoughts exactly , bo you recall the man from ROCHESTER NY, years ago, as I recall pressurization is set on one of the GARMEN SCREENS, which he never set, then asked for 20.000ft ? which should be like 10 000, they did pass out, then overflow destination until ran out of fuel, off JAMAICA ,.THE new TBM, this is now AUTOMATIC . RIP , 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Possible medical, emergency? Stroke or head bleed, comes into mind,
@@r64g I'm more thinking partial or slow loss of pressure, up until the point of crash
Like your new glasses Juan, they look good on you. They will look even better in that 777 cockpit. Thank you for all the effort you put into your informative videos.
We had some really nasty weather roll through upstate NY yesterday
You’re lucky he didn’t park that shit bird through your house and 10 feet into your basement!
Commercial Helo and former military pilot here...sounds like a classic right handed graveyard spin. Go off auto pilot with slight turn and inner ear tells you that you are straight and level...when you are actually turning and descending. I had an instructor do that to me with an emergency panel (no Art. Horizon) and no comms. It is a scary feeling when you realize your in a bad descending turn and when you try and correct it, your brain and body scream at you that you are wrong...put it back the way it was! It can get out of control in 15 seconds. This is where the phrase, "Trust your instruments," comes from. They will probably find this guy had low time IFR experience and flying the Lamborghini model of a private aircraft. Very unfortunate. Hope some good can eventually come of this. Condolences to his family.
Good vfr wx....
I am not a pilot, so here's my question. In flying VFR in the daytime, pilots look out of the window for attitude control, but it would seem that pilots would also glance at the instruments occasionally to get an idea of how they reacted to various changes in the attitude of the aircraft so in time a pilot would learn to trust his instruments intuitively and disregard what his inner ear was telling him. I know that as the aviation field grew, new instruments were added to the aircraft and the pilots just learned to use them over time. What am I missing here? Thank you.
@@blancolirio ouch...didn't realize he was in VFR conditions. Well, that adds quite a bunch to the investigation. Payne Stewart hypoxia or some sort of medical issue? This will be tough unless they find a mechanical issue...which is unlikely since all signs point to him being way behind in the aircraft. Back to you Mr. Blancolirio...
@@monkeyboy4746 Hey...you are not missing anything...I didn't realize he was in VFR conditions. Which means daytime and can see fine. He was flying an IFR flight plan due to the flight levels but could see outside...I did not realize that...which adds real mystery to the crash. You are correct though, if you are flying instruments in the daytime, you can look outside and immediately get your orientation...unless in the clouds or strange VFR on top of clouds.
monkeyboy4746 - This comes down to training. When VFR the only gyroscopic instrument of any use is the heading indicator. The rest are not required. When flying solely on instruments you MUST trust the gyro instruments TOTALLY. The toughest time is when you transition from visual to instrument flying (and back) in poor visibility. A commercial airliner typically has three attitude displays. Only when one disagrees with another do you start to ignore their indications. In small aircraft you compare one set of instruments with another to confirm that you are being supplied with valid information. The reality is your life depends on the quality of your initial and recurrent training.
i have said this before but I will say it again, this is a case of people with a lot of excess money and big egos buying expensive air planes that they don not have enough training and experience to safely fly but their egos tell them that they can. There is an old saying that goes like this, "what goes up must come down". As the person in control of the air plane once you get it into the air you must be prepared for it's eventual return to earth. The laws of gravity have not been repealed.
Sounds similar to TBM 700, N702H, unable to recover from a spin, which happened soon after starting decent into KMTJ, southwestern Colorado. 2014.
Very tragic what played out here. It’s painfully obvious he was not fully aware of what was going on. He failed to follow basic radio protocol by not acknowledging ATC instructions. Just his call sign back to them. Sounds like hypoxia or some other impairment. On TBM’s he would have simply updated autopilot with descend to altitude and heading...appears he turned off autopilot and lost control of the plane almost immediately. Truly sad.
Tragic.. I’m sure any ATC who last communicates with any stricken airplane has trouble sleeping that night. ‘...how do you read..’ those somber words said. They train for this scenario, but it never becomes routine. RIP the barrister and his niece.
Ken Clark Most people that have compassion, may. Just working in an ER and having a trauma or arrest before the end of ones shift, can leave one staring at the ceiling when in bed unable to fall asleep, after an evening shift. Adrenaline, and thinking of the other person, factors in. I am not sure what your career is, nor do I understand your comment.
Ivan Granger I didn’t really the prior comment either. I have been having some issues with my phone and my comment got released before I even finished
Ken Clark 👍🏻 Yes, that happens. The phones are not always user, friendly. I have had that happen to me, also.
The pilot was Stephen Barnes of Cellino & Barnes injury attorneys. Very reputable lawyer in the NY area. I can remember Their tv commercial jingle for 20 years now.
FAA does not fly the airplane. Do whatever you have to do to stay alive and the rest can be discussed on the ground. This is starting to look like a rich lawyer error.
Juan, very interesting analysis of the progression of events. I learned a lot of pilot stuff here. Pilot duty is very structured and for good cause. There are a lot of rules to follow because there is a lot of risk to manage. The rules are based on logical actions to keep everyone safe. When I was much younger I always thought piloting would be really cool because I love the visual perspective from the air. It wasn't so much about idea of being a pilot per se, but more about my love for the outdoors and the view of landscape with all its attributes. When I saw how much time and money to get a license, I never pursued it. I realized it would be a sustained major commitment of time to qualify and retain the pilot privilege... I spent my free time and money biking instead. It's so nice to have you review all this stuff, since it's your profession and post it for me to understand the intricacies of piloting and disasters. Thanks!
ATC: "Stop your descent, level your wings, maintain any altitude." Is that anything like a common ATC instruction? Or is this controller trying anything he can think of to help this pilot? Seems remarkable to me.
Last-ditch attempt to help, typical of when the controller suspects loss of control is at play.
Yes. Especially with a experienced controller, anything to communicate a desired result
The thought process is probably something like:
I can't figure out the problem for him and I can't fix anything mechanical from here - so on the off chance it's medical, I need to somehow keep him flying with simple instructions.
[And "medical" can be anything from hypoxia to a stroke to a blackout to spatial disorientiation, etc...]
Not standard ATC communication.
The controller at this point probably knew that something was wrong, as there was no response from the aircraft, after numerous attempts by the controller, to establish radio contact.
Doesn't seem "remarkable" other than the controller wants to be clear that he should stop descending immediately and is very concerned that he isn't.
Last radar data, if I saw it correctly, showed 440 knots at 11,300 feet. Now that is ground track speed...the speed over the ground, right? That's more like fighter-jet speed at that altitude, isn't it? Probably faster than a P-51D at full power. It looks like it descended from about 18,000 feet to 11,300 feet in 35 seconds. So, about 11,500 feet/min. 113 knots vertical speed. About 454 knots true airspeed in a 14-degree dive angle...if I calculated right and if the data is accurate (big if). Did part of one wing come off? Was the plane overstressed by the pilot when he was initially told to stop descent going about 330 knots at about 18000 feet? And then, perhaps, missing part of one wing it veered to the right and entered a spiraling dive? (highly speculative, there) I think they may find parts of the aircraft miles from the crash site. The radar track made an abrupt right, nearly 90-degree turn and into a dive. But, I could be wrong...and probably am wrong.
The TBM 850 spec sheet shows a Vmo (maximum operating speed) for the aircraft is 271 KCAS (calibrated airspeed in knots). At 7:14 in your video the data shows a ground speed of 446 kts. Did this pilot rip the empennage off of the plane trying to get down too fast?
most likely the case.
Same plane was damaged when it porpoised multiple times at KBUF in 2019. Another indication of lack of experience in such a high performance plane. To me it bolsters pilot error.
There were actually commercials on this video when I watched it, Juan. Very surprising.
he didn't say this video was demonetized.
@@DavidDavid-jb1cy All of Juan's other videos on aircraft accidents have been demonetized. That's why this one was a surprise. They'll probably demonetize it later.
Ty Juan Browne I share your videos with my grandson who will be 14 in 2 months. Much appreciated.❤
PS give a high five to Pete for me 🤗
Being a good pilot obviously requires numerous skills, and one of those skills is definitely good judgement.
Really appreciating the info.
THANKS. JUAN.....WELL DONE BROTHER....WE WANT SAFE AIR.
The pilot did not follow radio rules...when handed off he should have kept radio 2 on the old freq and radio 1 to whatever he thought was the assigned freg and leap frog your radio as needed....or at least just kept 1 radio on 121.5. As an ISL rated pilot he should have know as he was about 100 miles out that he would be given decent instructions soon, when at 70 miles from his landing point, he should have been calling center to find out why he has not. Pilot error, failure to maintain flight control and procedures.
Thank you a again.
9 hrs of flying over 3 months is not enough to remain IFR proficient.
Especially on a plane such as that.
ekbusdriver Damn right! If I flew 9 hours in ONE month, I would feel rusty on not at all proficient and I’m a pilot at Fedex! That guy needed a lot for experience, recent experience and training. Sad.
The Cellino & Barnes jingle plays after NYC metro traffic reports to the point where at least half the population prob has it memorized. My condolences to the families and especially thoughts go out to the ATC controllers involved. Unfortunate but everyone will need to lawyer up on this one.
Sounds to me like he got " behind the aurcraft " because he had trouble with the nav/radio systems. At 300TAS, things happen very fast and if your not ready ( or properly trained ) with your onboard systems , things like this will happen,
Thank you Juan, I've been hoping you'd provide a video on this accident. I read an article in the Buffalo News earlier where Richard Barnes, the dad to the passenger Elizabeth and brother to the pilot talks about his grief after learning from others in their law firm that his brothers plane went down and he had to tell those people that his daughter was also onboard. Thanks again for your reporting. Thoughts and prayers to all the family members friends connected to this accident.
Juan, I like the new glasses.
Saw this over on VAS’s channel. Very odd crash. RIP.
Personal injury lawyer. I wonder who his clients were and what cases he was working on. Hmmm
@@recoveringsoul755 his firm was just broken up this spring.
@@AreeyaKKC Perhaps he was going to a new firm? If so, he may have kept the same clients. I imagine any lawyer may have enemies
@@recoveringsoul755 injury attorney. So enemies are the corporate elite and insurance companies.
No disrespect intended, but I wonder if the niece’s family will sue the estate of the PIC. It would be rather ironic.
play those last few minutes and watch SPEED only..... I think he might have ripped it apart trying to descend fast, too fast, maybe the tail will be found a long ways away from the main wreckage?
I was wondering the same sort of thing about a wing ... starts the descent entirely too fast and speed climbing, then rate of descent increases sharply and speed increase does so as well. There's also that sudden apparent turn to the right...
One minor correction: Juan said at the beginning "prominent NYC attorney" which is incorrect. While they have NYC area offices, they are actually based in Buffalo in WNY.
I noticed something seemed wrong when the pilot stopped reading back ATC instructions , and just kept answering with his call sign..
Yup. I think its because he didn't understand what they wanted and was hoping to just figure it out as he went.
Often the case with mental saturation. Interesting that ATC asked is everything ok.
ATC did not say anything that required a read back, so acknowledgment with only the call sign was good, and actually helps cut back on all the useless BS some pilots spew on transmissions.
@@ekbusdriver "descend and maintain 8,000" requires a readback.
I once was listening to ATC while plane spotting at an airport. I heard a pilot from a major airline say, “I’m confused. I think I misunderstood something and aren’t doing what you told me to. I’m on heading _x_ and at _y_ feet. What are you expecting?”
I’m paraphrasing as it was many years ago when I started my flight training. It helped me a lot to hear an experienced pilot admit he was unsure of the situation and fess up that he may of made a mistake.
Just a correction for you, the aircraft was a 2009 TBM 700 not 2016. It was purchased by Steve in 2016
Thanks Juan. I was wondering what was going on with the pilot, as he seemed unconcerned and not forthcoming. I suspect hypoxia, gauging by his inadequate responses.
That's what I'm thinking.
Not the first depress incident involving the TBM if that turns out to be the case.
@@wewd It's going to be hard to investigate that angle. It made a fair sized crater in the ground according to the policeman interviewed on TV.
I don't like to speculate, however if it was due to hypoxia, I seem to remember another TBM hypoxia accident (which was brand new at the time) a few years ago. I believe it was a husband and wife enroute to Florida from NY and eventually the plane went down after fuel was exhausted.
Hypoxia seems unlikely. Once you're knocked out, you're likely not coming back unless you get to a lower altitude (or get on oxygen). And if you do, you aren't forming coherent sentences.
Military Training...3 Cs- Confess, Climb, Communicate.
Judging by the 3 or 4 advertisements that interrupted this, I'd say RUclips isn't demonetizing at all. They're just not giving you your fair share.
I'm getting the same non stop political ads on all videos now
@McFarland I'm using the app for android and another trick that works is play the last few seconds of the video and after it ends you watch it add free
"Demonetized" doesn't mean that RUclips doesn't play ads; it means that Juan doesn't receive any income from those ads. RUclips is quite happy to profit from topics that they think the creator shouldn't profit from. Bit of a double standard.
@@lizj5740 I always let one or two ads play to drive some revenue to the creator but lately its non stop negative political ads so I just lower the volume let them play and go to the bathroom or something for a few minutes then come back a watch the full video
@@MikeBova1 Perhaps the political ads are US-centric. I get ads for powdering gentlemen's private parts, Grammarly, and some online investment program. Usually, they can be turned off after 5 seconds.
Here in New York its reported TBM 700. Well know injury lawyers here.
The TBM 850 is also known as the TBM 700N. I fly the 850. Just a variant with some small upgrades.
Yawn. Another rich dude that thought he could do what the pros do. Spoiler alert. You can’t.
I could never be a pilot for this reason: how the blazes anyone understands each other on comm is beyond me. Anyway, from all the crash simulations I've seen, distraction is the main reason for accidents. By distraction, I mean fixation on a single issue with disregard for all others. Then again, his could have been a medical emergency. I feel sorry for his niece.
The audio you hear is often captured by amateur equipment. Very much appreciated but it’s not what a pilot hears, particularly when wearing a headset. And a lot of it is an acquired talent. You get accustomed to it.
It's actually really logical and easy once you get the hang of it.
As Raoul says, the audio you hear on RUclips does not represent the actual quality. Also, we know the lingo. We can always ask for clarification if we do not understand something.
Agreed. I find aviation fascinating, but despite protestations of how "safe" private aviation is, I believe there are too many things that can go wrong unexpectedly, and gravity will kill you _every_ time if you are more than about 50ft off the ground.
A neighbour tried to persuade me to take my daughter in a flight in the plane that she and her husband owned, and I politely declined. A few months later that neighbour turned the trainer she was flying into a ball of scrap metal (literally folded up the wings) in a crash landing. She was lucky to walk away (I guess that made it a "good" landing, not a "great" one! :-/), but she was still hospitalized and needed surgery for several fractures to her face/ eye socket.
@@tomcorwine3091 Yeah, okay, however the thought comes to mind that perhaps pilots may think they heard an instruction when they really didn't. I won't get on a plane anymore, so this has nothing to do with me personally.
Cellino and Barns was also well known injury Attorneys in the Greater Los Angeles Area and The San Francisco Bay Area for their TV commercials before the breakup of the law firm.
Well ...Dan surely took care of Bobby Garcia's comment...
Best regards...Rudy
Juan the 850 is a slick plane and he obviously got well behind the plane. I am wondering with his what looks like little time in that aircraft what really happened with those radios. Did he mess it up himself or was there indeed an issue. As a pilot who routinely flies single pilot IFR on part 135 I keep 121.5 in comm 2 all the time like you said and it is a good plan. Will be interesting to see what comes of this
I'm a instrument, multi engine rated pilot. Lots of experience is important, and many part time pilots don't have enough flying time in a type of plane like this. We probably remember the Kennedy who took a flight over water to an airport near the coast of New England. You had to shake your head, that with his lack of making such a flight was a terrible idea. I'm not sure he was even instrument rated.
He did not have his insrument rating he was legal to make that trip but did not realize how black the ocean can be on a hazy summer night
"When Lawyers Crash" unaware of the effects of such on the industry, makes sense.
Not only when they crash, but when ambulance chasers lock onto a GA crash. Started way back in the '70s. Extremely high rate of pilot error accidents that resulted in litigation against manufacturers. Greedy lawyers killed the GA affordable aircraft market.
@@tenpiloto our 1977 C-172 full IFR was $25,300 with 100 hours on it had to replace the O320 H2AD at 377 hrs.
Sad that his niece died.
HoundDogMech---not sure about the replacement relevance, but $25K in 1977 is $130K in today's $. A new 172 IFR equipped is well over $300K. Product liability lawsuits (which actually have been throttled back a bit by courts) account for much of that $170K difference.
@@tenpiloto talk about dollar value first lesson in june of '7 was $10/ hr wet tach time in a 4 seat Aero Commander Darter and $5 for the instructor. I was making $2/hr so I had to work 10 hours for 1 hour of instruction.
These accidents keep happening and are going to drive insurance costs through the roof. This could be a medical, hypoxia, or could be loss of control. We don't know what the weather was but if he was in IMC and took the TBM off autopilot because of the rapid descent needed maybe he just got disoriented and lost control? We need to know how many hours he had in the aircraft and how much time in actual IFR conditions.
Too much plane for him, and it just got away from him? I’ve been flying for over 50 years, now retired, and the first thing you do when you haven’t heard from center for awhile is start chatting with whoever you can reach on the radio. Then get back to the correct freq. The fact that he said everything is fine is odd, then he stopped communicating again?
Guess it’s up to the NTSB to sort through this one.
A friend of my family who flew F-14's in the Navy has the exact same plane. He told me once after flying it for couple of months that you couldn't let yourself fall behind the aircraft.
@ianh That was my thought. Steveo is constantly working and monitoring his plane.
JB methinks a follow up is in order conferencing in Dan Gryder.
Happened 10 mins from where I Live. He was lawyer based out of Buffalo NY not NYC.
Even I know you're supposed to pull back on the throttle and slow down. He must have been in the red on the air speed.
Oh, yes, you see the law firm's ads all the time on Buffalo TV.
Here in the SF Bay Area, we get a lot of TV ads trolling for victims of Boy Scout molestations and "cancer from Roundup." Oh, and let's not forget getting uterine cancer from Johnson & Johnson talcum powder. These cretins will crawl under any rock they can find looking for hidden riches. No sympathy.
Celleno and Barnes just went through a messy firm breakup. Also at one point Cellino lost their legal bar license for 6 months. Very very well know across NYS with their commercials and 888-8888 number
Jttv Yep! Major distractions!
@@blancolirio the new Barnes firm was to be active 9 Oct...what timing!?
Sadly ironic “The firm's practice focuses on multiple areas, including airplane accidents, dog bites, and wrongful death, according to their website.”
@@barbaralane9825 Rather strange irony. Any chance this was anything other than an accident?
Personal Injury (wrongful death) claim to be handled by their own law firm? Ironic.
i obtained my
ppl after 40hrs but took me 1000 hrs to be proficient
Is there any similarity to this sort of thing and inexperienced motorcycle riders getting big fast sports bikes.
They can go too fast to keep up with unless you have experienced it, a lot.
Yes! Exactly the same only even more complicated.
@@jiyushugi1085
Yep.
Again!! If this is demonitised, why am I seeing so many ads in it?? I think what you tube is doing is bordering on criminal. (not to mention STUPID)
Yes, completely agree!
The video won’t be immediately demonetized, the last vid (KC135 incident) wasn’t demonetized until after more than an day of uptime I believe
These f..ken mid roll ads are driving me NUTS.
I'll just go ahead and call it theft.
You have a choice to go with RUclips Premium that's free of ads for about $10 a month. Also there is free software that blocks the ads. Do a search.
Boy - i was listening for aural evidence of hypoxia in the pilot, but i heard it in the Buffalo approach controller, slurring his words.
YES!! I agree.. the controller was too hard to understand..
The NTSB said they will not send investigators to the crash seen due the COVID 19 concerns. There are some COVID hot spots in the state but not in the area of the crash seen.
I thought the controllers did a terrific job but I was surprised they never asked the pilot to Ident if he could hear them. Is that not done anymore?
No need to ident. He had them on the radar already. You can tell because the controller knows his altitude and knows the wings aren’t level. Ident is used so the controller can find the plane on his screen.
Identing can be used to acknowledge transmissions from ATC when the pilot is able to hear the controller but cannot transmit back to them. For instance “TBM 5DM if you hear Boston Center ident”. If the pilot then idents the controller can issue instructions and the pilot can acknowledge them by identing.
Flyer Don - True. Good point.
the opening Utube ad about "joinhoney" just about blew the earwax out of my head. where do they FIND these young people with voices that can break 3/4 plate GLASS???
Great reporting one. Everybody turns to you for accurate information.
It’s a little weird but I think all pilots hope that you will cover any accident that they’re involved in so that the truth is out there.
I wonder if you could do something on the great ag pilot Randy Berry Who was killed in a crash on the job recently.
I still CAN NOT get over this one!!!! Very Sad. Randy had over 40,000 hrs. His business was doing really well, I've heard. I sure hope his wife will be able to hold the business together, as they both have worked so, so hard over the years. I still can't believe it. Sad man, Sad!!!!!
This is why the insurance rates on owner-flown turbo props and jets has recently tripled. Recommendation: Professional grade aircraft should be flown by a professional pilot. No disrespect intended to the PIC of the accident aircraft.
It would be interesting to know the total time and time in type of the PIC.
Total time is not nearly as important as recent experience and recent training. High time pilots have crashed aircraft because they simply didn’t fly the plane.
The V Tail Doctor killer has been replaced by TBMs.
Thanks for the great analysis. I fly a TBM and the plane can descent at a high rate of speed, like 6000' per minute, safely as long as the engine is idle and the speed is properly monitored. The big prop acts as an airbrake. This and being unresponsive on radio, I suspect hypoxia was a factor. Apparently he did not read back properly when asked to descent maintain 8000 (unless this was cut during editing). If he was lacking oxygen, it is possible that he started the descent with cruise power. That would overspeed the airframe quickly.
The ATClive recordings are usually people feeding a scanner radio into the internet - so the radio could have been scanning through channels til it stopped on Barnes' last transmission. He sounded fairly business like and to the point in the recording. My guess is he wasn't watching air speed on his 5,000 fpm descent from 28,000.
Such a waste. I wonder what caused him to get so far behind the airplane. It's obvious he was behind the curve by the time radio contact was re-established. Maybe changed to wrong frequency (say from center to approach) and then just never caught up. Wow, almost 7000 ft/min descent. We'll see. As to the lawyer comments, I remember reading articles from as far back as the 1960's and '70s claiming that doctors and lawyers seemed to take more chances than other demographics. Thanks, Juan, for the usual great coverage!
Thanks Juan. Like stated below, how can RUclips run adverts during a video of such content but demonetise the channel posting it ? Hopefully a Lawyer might want to pursue them for profiteering through someone's death ?
If it was illegal to profit from someone's death, you wouldn't have fossil fuel, meat packing and pesticide industries to name but a few.
As usual, compelling stuff, well presented, Juan. RUclips (Google) probably has enough money to pay everyone on earth. Generously compensating those who present original and popular content here should be a given. Best regards
I can't believe you're being demonitised. I knew youtube were against truth but my God, its getting ridiculous!
Not demonetized so far. Got 3 times interrupted by commercials. Maybe this time they appreciate your work.
Demonetized does not mean no ads; it means Juan gets no income from any ads shown.
@@lizj5740 thanks for clarifying. Didn't know that.
A very strange one. If he'd tried to land but was too hot and high that would be one thing, but he was nowhere near the runway. Constant lack of communications response, does any pilot deliberately ignore ATC? At the very least that's going to get you in serious licence threatening trouble.
When things go south inside the airplane anything that doesn't help you immediately goes to the bottom of the priority list.
@@thomasbelstler6372 Yes, you're right.
Thanks for your wise comments!
i flew a c210 for years and just loved it. insurance expense has grounded me. it costs more than an overhaul on engine and prop.
Just curious as to your premiums in the US? We have a few decent companies here in the UK. Visi Cover is the one most people I know use. My last premium on a PA28 was £450/yr for private use. When a friend flew it, i just went online and popped his details inl times, currency etc and there was no charge. Another low time pilot(Circa 100 hrs) Was only £30 to put him on for the duration of the policy. A plane in the 210 class usually costs around £1200/yr. But your fuel will save over ££6000/yr, (£60/hr x 200 hrs in the UK)so it's swings and roundabouts?
As a non-pilot who has however flown in light aircraft a lot, I can't believe how poor the diction is of some ATC people.
In an occupation where almost the only quality required is verbal aptitude, much of the information given to this pilot and in others that I have listened to, was so rushed and un-nuanced as to be almost useless in a highly stressed situation.