AR really did a fantastic job here. Not only does he have a great view to spot the original foul and the retaliation, but he does a fantastic job intervening before anything else breaks out. Class AR.
You can argue that the finger pointing wasn't a good move, but I don't think it was "the no.1 thing you shouldn't do." I can think of at least a couple other things that would be worse than that lol.
STRONGLY disagree. the call could have been made from the sideline. the ARs job is to "assist". the AR jumped in too quick. made the CR look like he wasn't doing his job. bad call for no YC on green, bad look for the crew.
@@jasonbates9702 - I very much agree with this... Far too many times ARs who also are Centers, but not assigned this game, try to push their way onto the pitch like they are the center ref. There was no need. Center gave out the red correctly to white for the kickback, but green definitely should have seen at least a Yellow for that overly aggressive tackle that got only the player in white & zero ball.
@@pythonidaepraeceptor1023 Yes, clear yellow. She clearly slid into the player instead of the ball. In fact, I'd have given the stomper a yellow and called it good.
@@shlepmessing8703 No, she clearly slid into the ball and gained possession. The white player did trip slightly, but after the green player gained possession. Clearly no cards for either player.
@@pythonidaepraeceptor1023tbh it looked like green was getting the red at first for the awful slide challenge, a yellow would be normal but in lower leagues it’s usually clearly one or the other. I would’ve given one for the tears but the kick to the face is a red
Green needed at least a yellow card for the tackle. Ref was sleeping, along his assistant. Both incompetent, and don't see that the tackler doesn't take the ball, but only the legs of the defender.
Being high school, you can call it what you want... VC, SFP or USB for retaliation. All three are red card offenses (in Tennessee). I'd lean towards VC as it was done after the play in an apparent intentional motion.
"All three are red card offenses (in Tennessee)." That's pretty funny, but if this is High School, it's actually true, state school athletic associations "make up" the rules for their states. If it's under FIFA/IFAB rules, then, well, should be the same in every state. Though UB is a yellow in "normal" rules. Not sure about TN HS rules ;-)
watch the video... green slides underneath the left leg of white that she had just extended during the kick. Clearly going for the ball... White's right foot stays on ground the entire time.
The late slide deserves a yellow as it was reckless. Cleating the defender is a send-off. AR did a good job getting involved. The CR is no where in the frame. While they got the red correct, I hope they gave the caution as well.
Rules actually train ARs to NOT do what he did in terms of running onto the field and intervening. His job could easily have been done from the sidelines in signaling for the foul and calling the center over to him to confer to make sure he gets the card right. Instead, he ran the whole show and undermined the center.
The slide had some contact but green simply missed, and white recovered - no foul there as the ball was still at the feet of white. You can't card every hard challenge! At best you might give white an IDFK for dangerous play (this is a high school) in that green slid right into the kick, putting herself into a dangerous spot. But regardless, the red card was well deserved for the heel stomp/kick by white against green and that's what the AR waved for.
Very hard to tell from this super far away angle. If there was an intention to hurt her, then it should have been a red. If she tried to play the ball and didn't slide straight into the opponent, then it's a normal tackle. But we can't tell from this angle.
@boomstickclan Dude, she cleared the ball with her left foot, then reached back with her right to kick the girl in the head/back. That's not follow through. Thats serious foul play, a red card.
That must be a State level rule then. I have never heard of Unsporting Behaviour being a red card offense before. Not that I disagree with the concept, it would help keep the game more clean and honest. National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
i dont see a foul agasnt white because she already kicked the ball and green did the slide tackle right after so green coused the foul and should have been sent off. white looked and sees green thinking there not going to slide tackle.
Its a red card offense to act in a violent manner. Even if it wasn't intentional, that movement is not a natural movement for someone to make when walking. And, if you didn't notice, the player didn't argue at all. She knew it was coming National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
The slide tackle was questionablely late, but the red card should have been NO card! The slide tackle contact was after ball was cleared so potentially a yeloow card but I personally would not have given either card!
This was a good call by the Refs. Watching the video at first I saw a clean play where white kicked the ball as green tried to tackle and saw whites leg that kicked the ball hit her in the face. After watching this over a few times i saw the AR demonstrating white kicking Her right leg up behind. I then watched it again and saw whites right leg kick green clear intention to hurt. So on that part i agree with the Red Card. I also agree with some comments below that green should get a Yellow Card for her reaction and behavior.
Slide was too much. The stomp warranted a yellow but, if you don't want to get stomped, don't put that much energy in taking out someone's legs. Slide to the side... not into them.
If that was a followthrough, it was the worst followthrough i've seen in a long time. Those boys in the NASL wouldn't even try to justify that, and they argue everything! National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
Appropriate card given to white player for violent conduct (stomping/kicking an opponent.) However the AR should have realized why the player was retaliating, and told the referee to caution the green player for a late challenge. At least the serious foul wasn't unpunished. But that is not good teamwork between officials. NISOA Referee
As a NISOA Referee I would hope you would know just because a challenge is late does not make it a cautionable offense. It has to meet the criteria of a cautionable offense as per the FIFA LOTG. I will agree however, given the situation a caution would of been justified. However, In a different match, that probably would of been a stern talking too. Nothing malicious, just mistimed. National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
That slide tackle isn't yellow card worthy. Perhaps if it was the second or third time the same player had done it, sure. But there was nothing reckless or dangerous about it. Slightly late, and missed the ball? Sure. It's a foul. But it's not malicious or even particularly dangerous. Good work from refs.
That was great intervening from the AR, but that was an awful call from the ref. The white player was trying to clear it, not expecting the green player to slide tackle. I don't see how in any world the white player should be given a card. The green player was going in with a good slide tackle, and claimed the ball, but definitely not the white player's fault. How was she supposed to stop her foot from going into the green player's face? I don't think he should have given any cards.
The red is for clearly intentionally stomping on the green player which is "serious foul play" which according to the laws of the game can only be disciplined with a send off.
You are all wrong. First, the penalty should be on green. Second, the girl in the white was just fallowing through on her kick. I have done this before, and although i have not gotten carded, i have hurt some people. It is not a foul!
The tackle was fine, she slid in before the ball was cleared. The defender could have avoided the challenge aswell. You yanks leave football to the rest of the world.
![EVERY RED CARD [ NWSL 2022 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NHXwQpAT21k/mqdefault.jpg)
![EVERY RED CARD [ NWSL 2022 ]](/img/tr.png)
AR really did a fantastic job here. Not only does he have a great view to spot the original foul and the retaliation, but he does a fantastic job intervening before anything else breaks out. Class AR.
You can argue that the finger pointing wasn't a good move, but I don't think it was "the no.1 thing you shouldn't do." I can think of at least a couple other things that would be worse than that lol.
Great call by the assistant referee
STRONGLY disagree. the call could have been made from the sideline. the ARs job is to "assist". the AR jumped in too quick. made the CR look like he wasn't doing his job. bad call for no YC on green, bad look for the crew.
yeah he would have done a great job if he also gave a yellow to the original slide tackle
@@jasonbates9702 - I very much agree with this... Far too many times ARs who also are Centers, but not assigned this game, try to push their way onto the pitch like they are the center ref. There was no need. Center gave out the red correctly to white for the kickback, but green definitely should have seen at least a Yellow for that overly aggressive tackle that got only the player in white & zero ball.
The girl who slid should have been booked also for the mist-timed tackle.
The card was for Violent Conduct. The white player stepped down on the green player intentionally. Great AR!
clear yellow card on the slide tackle also
"clear yellow"... Huh??? XD
@@pythonidaepraeceptor1023 Yes, clear yellow. She clearly slid into the player instead of the ball. In fact, I'd have given the stomper a yellow and called it good.
@@shlepmessing8703 No, she clearly slid into the ball and gained possession. The white player did trip slightly, but after the green player gained possession. Clearly no cards for either player.
@@chipotelphotography joking right, green got no ball
@@pythonidaepraeceptor1023tbh it looked like green was getting the red at first for the awful slide challenge, a yellow would be normal but in lower leagues it’s usually clearly one or the other. I would’ve given one for the tears but the kick to the face is a red
That looked like what used to be a normal tackle up to the 1990s
RC for White, YC for green. This isn't the pros, you ain't reacting like that on my field.
Bitch she got stepped on how u going react
Your field?
The white player didn't react to the "foul". What are you talking about?
@@chipotelphotographythat’s the issue, he’s talking about green. Had a temper tantrum.
@@wedge5896he’s not saying he owns it clown. He would’ve given a yellow for how she reacted.
@markscarpa I failed to see that. I was just looking at the left foot. Thank you for pointing that out.
Green needed at least a yellow card for the tackle. Ref was sleeping, along his assistant. Both incompetent, and don't see that the tackler doesn't take the ball, but only the legs of the defender.
At least a yellow XD
My god you people would not last in a real soccer game.
Cracking tackle imo. That's what we need to see more of!
Just a shame she then kicked out at her after the tackle 🤣
Being high school, you can call it what you want... VC, SFP or USB for retaliation. All three are red card offenses (in Tennessee). I'd lean towards VC as it was done after the play in an apparent intentional motion.
"All three are red card offenses (in Tennessee)." That's pretty funny, but if this is High School, it's actually true, state school athletic associations "make up" the rules for their states. If it's under FIFA/IFAB rules, then, well, should be the same in every state. Though UB is a yellow in "normal" rules. Not sure about TN HS rules ;-)
watch the video... green slides underneath the left leg of white that she had just extended during the kick. Clearly going for the ball... White's right foot stays on ground the entire time.
The late slide deserves a yellow as it was reckless. Cleating the defender is a send-off. AR did a good job getting involved. The CR is no where in the frame. While they got the red correct, I hope they gave the caution as well.
Rules actually train ARs to NOT do what he did in terms of running onto the field and intervening. His job could easily have been done from the sidelines in signaling for the foul and calling the center over to him to confer to make sure he gets the card right. Instead, he ran the whole show and undermined the center.
wrong. It was for the player in white kicking/stomping on the player after the slide. Should have been yellow for green, red for white
The two players desserve a red card !
Never a red card for the tackle. It was yellow though. The red card given was justified.
The slide had some contact but green simply missed, and white recovered - no foul there as the ball was still at the feet of white. You can't card every hard challenge! At best you might give white an IDFK for dangerous play (this is a high school) in that green slid right into the kick, putting herself into a dangerous spot. But regardless, the red card was well deserved for the heel stomp/kick by white against green and that's what the AR waved for.
Very hard to tell from this super far away angle. If there was an intention to hurt her, then it should have been a red. If she tried to play the ball and didn't slide straight into the opponent, then it's a normal tackle. But we can't tell from this angle.
@Misshappyfeet101 He said "Ohh STRAIGHT red" not great red.
@boomstickclan Dude, she cleared the ball with her left foot, then reached back with her right to kick the girl in the head/back. That's not follow through. Thats serious foul play, a red card.
how is it a late slide? she slid before the ball even left her feet.
It’s when they make contact, not when they initially engage.
That must be a State level rule then. I have never heard of Unsporting Behaviour being a red card offense before. Not that I disagree with the concept, it would help keep the game more clean and honest.
National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
Lmao she deliberately kicked/ stepped on the player because she got fouled. It’s violent conduct. Fifa referee my ass 😂
i dont see a foul agasnt white because she already kicked the ball and green did the slide tackle right after so green coused the foul and should have been sent off. white looked and sees green thinking there not going to slide tackle.
The late slide tackle from the green player is a straight red card for dangerous play, not even yellow.
LMAO
so no yellow for green ???? and yea white team red card is fair
David the Garner you must play AYSO. That’s a blatant kick from white. Get glasses.
The red card was issued because the girl in white hit the prone green player with her knee.
Its a red card offense to act in a violent manner. Even if it wasn't intentional, that movement is not a natural movement for someone to make when walking.
And, if you didn't notice, the player didn't argue at all. She knew it was coming
National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
The slide tackle was questionablely late, but the red card should have been NO card! The slide tackle contact was after ball was cleared so potentially a yeloow card but I personally would not have given either card!
Retaliation = sending off. The reckless challenge from 23 was yellow card at least.
This was a good call by the Refs. Watching the video at first I saw a clean play where white kicked the ball as green tried to tackle and saw whites leg that kicked the ball hit her in the face. After watching this over a few times i saw the AR demonstrating white kicking Her right leg up behind. I then watched it again and saw whites right leg kick green clear intention to hurt. So on that part i agree with the Red Card. I also agree with some comments below that green should get a Yellow Card for her reaction and behavior.
Bet your a great laugh on a night out
Pretty amazing for a "NISOA Referee" to label VC as a "serious foul".
Why did the girl do that
Slide was too much. The stomp warranted a yellow but, if you don't want to get stomped, don't put that much energy in taking out someone's legs. Slide to the side... not into them.
Red card means go make a sandwich
Greens tackle was more careless then reckless. Mistimed. There was nothing malicious about it.
National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
If that was a followthrough, it was the worst followthrough i've seen in a long time. Those boys in the NASL wouldn't even try to justify that, and they argue everything!
National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
Appropriate card given to white player for violent conduct (stomping/kicking an opponent.) However the AR should have realized why the player was retaliating, and told the referee to caution the green player for a late challenge. At least the serious foul wasn't unpunished. But that is not good teamwork between officials.
NISOA Referee
but #23 should get a yellov card...she want kick #2 not a ball
That girl should pay better attention
Smoke show #2
Damn she knew she fucked up
These girls can be very vicious.
As a NISOA Referee I would hope you would know just because a challenge is late does not make it a cautionable offense. It has to meet the criteria of a cautionable offense as per the FIFA LOTG. I will agree however, given the situation a caution would of been justified. However, In a different match, that probably would of been a stern talking too. Nothing malicious, just mistimed.
National List - FIFA Nominated Referee
Boot to the face
That slide tackle isn't yellow card worthy.
Perhaps if it was the second or third time the same player had done it, sure. But there was nothing reckless or dangerous about it. Slightly late, and missed the ball? Sure. It's a foul. But it's not malicious or even particularly dangerous. Good work from refs.
That was great intervening from the AR, but that was an awful call from the ref. The white player was trying to clear it, not expecting the green player to slide tackle. I don't see how in any world the white player should be given a card. The green player was going in with a good slide tackle, and claimed the ball, but definitely not the white player's fault. How was she supposed to stop her foot from going into the green player's face? I don't think he should have given any cards.
RC Green SFP, RC White VC. Both should've been sent off the field.
No the red card was appropriate but I would have booked the green player with a yellow card do to the reckless nature of her mistimed tackle
+Joe Egloff what did the white player get the red card for.... if any thing it should have been green to get red
The red is for clearly intentionally stomping on the green player which is "serious foul play" which according to the laws of the game can only be disciplined with a send off.
She stomped on her? Oh dang, I didn't see that..
yeah it's hard to catch, but you can see it if your're looking for it. That being said the AR had a perfect angle.
You are all wrong. First, the penalty should be on green. Second, the girl in the white was just fallowing through on her kick. I have done this before, and although i have not gotten carded, i have hurt some people. It is not a foul!
The tackle was fine, she slid in before the ball was cleared. The defender could have avoided the challenge aswell. You yanks leave football to the rest of the world.