это точно! не надо строить плотины надо использовать механизмы давно придуманные человечеством ruclips.net/video/Md5sqdAv6Vg/видео.htmlsi=BNghVQeOpndz4Owg
This hazardous waste called water turbines has nothing to do with sustainability, green or independent energy. The production of extremely toxic substances and paints alone is endlessly harmful to the environment. It destroys the wildlife in the water. It would make the most sense if people stopped using so much electricity and started living a little more independently again.
It needs to be said that real-time power generation is far more complex, with electromechanical servo control to sync with the grid. These systems apply only to battery power techniques.
To první řešení hydroelektrárny může být kaskádovitě za sebou díky sklonu řeky může být za sebou po obou stranách několik takových zařízení. Přebytek můžete využít v gravitačních elektrárnách nebo pro uložení elektrické energie a nadbytek v chladnějším počasí může dobře zásobovat elektrokotle je to grátis a za náklady hydroelektrárny. Ve výhodě jsou ti co mají řeku s optimálním průtokem po celý rok.
We live right next to an earth dam where water pours through the sluices at the base for the majority of the year at a great and powerful rate, particularly in the summer months. It would be a perfect place for this kind of generator and could provide power for most of the small community that lives nearby. And it could feed into the grid. Even if it supplied power needs for some of the year it would surely still be viable; the infrastructure of the dam and sluices are already there! We have lived here for twenty years and the dam has existed since the 1980s. Yet nobody ever talks about doing this. So blind and narrow minded when they erect a few wind turbines nearby at enormous cost which probably supply far less power than this would. How can I get people to listen to me?
I think its because its stronger and longer lasting since its made out of concrete. The turbine operates on a horizontal axis at the water's level and utilizies the natural flow of a whirlpool making it more efficient whereas a water wheel operates on a vertical axis therefore requiring that a part of the wheel be at the water's level at all times, which can change. Nothing wrong with water wheels but the simple answer is that a turbine powered dam is just more efficient, and if noise might bother you a turbine dam would be quieter.
i like it i had off topic thought today maybe energy put into lift for a hovercraft for example could be a quantum return compared to same power applied to the drive shaft.....
Esse sistema é interessante é assim que às hidrelétrica funciona sabemos que o potencial principal é das hidrelétricas igual a esse equipamento a água do rio é permanente em quanto tiver água tem energia e a Elice na água fica um redemoinho nesse movimento sai energia do gerador com voltage regulada.
I find this video amazing for the lack of the scientific knowledge. An idea is no longer good enough. Hydraulic inventions have to compete with the existing turbines already developed to achieve certain efficiency. Thus able to generate electricity isn't an invention but to generate more than the existing machines should be the goal! Some of the ideas shown here are laughable by scientists and engineers who are trained in this field!
Unfortunately, hydropower has extremely high investment costs (here approx. 5-20 T$ per kWp), but generates electricity continuously (except during drought). Due to the extreme drop in prices for solar modules, electricity from hydro and wind power plants is now 3 to 10 times more expensive in comparison. Today you can buy 400W solar modules for as little as 50-70$.
Catch, all these neat power production devices are being obsolete due to excessive rechargeable devices being produced. In the conversion of energy, it will be required to have ultra high powered constant nuclear power generation in the world of energy storage devices (batteries). Storing energy is not green, how it's generated in the quantities needed to fill all these storage devices in the real factor.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
You don't doubt anything by putting your watermark on content that does not belong to you.
😮😅😊🎉😂❤
Fr
Money sucker 😠 ~ how many adverts were in this video?
Who does this belong to?
@@jaybash2944Turbulent hydropower from Belgium & Waterrotor
There's no way the Fishes just bounce-slide over this thing hahahahahahah
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
это точно! не надо строить плотины надо использовать механизмы давно придуманные человечеством ruclips.net/video/Md5sqdAv6Vg/видео.htmlsi=BNghVQeOpndz4Owg
its really incredible to see how enormous and systematic efforts are being made towards self reliant cleaner energy, 👍
This hazardous waste called water turbines has nothing to do with sustainability, green or independent energy. The production of extremely toxic substances and paints alone is endlessly harmful to the environment. It destroys the wildlife in the water.
It would make the most sense if people stopped using so much electricity and started living a little more independently again.
Imagine if it actually worked and didnt take 30 years to pay for itself, that would be really incredible.
Those who built this dam may God bless them 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Wow 🤯
Too good for rural settings
[Music][Applause]
How much does it cost ???
Your life’s savings
@@ayeitzdj and without philosophy how much?
@@ayeitzdj*Your wife‘s cravings
3 jahre😊
Me too.. i have new system hydro energi. I hope usefull to next time
Good job
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
wow paint can fix physical damage
It is soo educative
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
I can´t believe this can be fish-friendly. It almost seems like blender.
Muchas gracias por la información excelente trabajo
Super ^^^&*****
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
its 3AM and i have an exam in 7, haven't studied yet for the last couple of days and here i am
awesome!
Oh nice, if only the county would build a river next to my house so i could utilize this technology.
oh....or you could move??
@raysteel6317 yeah I could move under a bridge and live next to you
Pretty cool but "300 homes" Haha id be supprised if its even 300 watts
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
có bán hàng ko bant
Me gusta mucho soy de guatemaltecos
what application to make the animation...
It needs to be said that real-time power generation is far more complex, with electromechanical servo control to sync with the grid. These systems apply only to battery power techniques.
Not necessarily, microhydro can easily be sited and distributed to grid in more rural areas. Also rural area could use and excess sold to grid
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
If its ac or dc power i dont know but dont see why one could not use it for ones home energy source. .
@@palych8502 so you have your own dam power/
@@jamesgarland3606 Can be installed without a dam. The main volume of water per unit of time ... Можно ставить и без плотины
I think few fish have a chance without a fence at the entrance.
To první řešení hydroelektrárny může být kaskádovitě za sebou díky sklonu řeky může být za sebou po obou stranách několik takových zařízení. Přebytek můžete využít v gravitačních elektrárnách nebo pro uložení elektrické energie a nadbytek v chladnějším počasí může dobře zásobovat elektrokotle je to grátis a za náklady hydroelektrárny. Ve výhodě jsou ti co mají řeku s optimálním průtokem po celý rok.
Why are you presenting Turbulent’s design as your own?
3:24 14 кВт при каком напряжении? Что-то мне подсказывает что это не 220 Вольт, и даже не 110.
❤
How mach energy produce in day
Hola.
A cuantos hogares ..
Abastecer de electricidad...
Gracias
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
Muito bom
Gostei
I can add one turbine more when it is 3m high? then it is 30kW totally?
We live right next to an earth dam where water pours through the sluices at the base for the majority of the year at a great and powerful rate, particularly in the summer months. It would be a perfect place for this kind of generator and could provide power for most of the small community that lives nearby. And it could feed into the grid. Even if it supplied power needs for some of the year it would surely still be viable; the infrastructure of the dam and sluices are already there! We have lived here for twenty years and the dam has existed since the 1980s. Yet nobody ever talks about doing this. So blind and narrow minded when they erect a few wind turbines nearby at enormous cost which probably supply far less power than this would.
How can I get people to listen to me?
Why is this better than a strait forward water wheel setup?
I think its because its stronger and longer lasting since its made out of concrete. The turbine operates on a horizontal axis at the water's level and utilizies the natural flow of a whirlpool making it more efficient whereas a water wheel operates on a vertical axis therefore requiring that a part of the wheel be at the water's level at all times, which can change. Nothing wrong with water wheels but the simple answer is that a turbine powered dam is just more efficient, and if noise might bother you a turbine dam would be quieter.
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
@@palych8502 Well , where is your video ?
@@SA-qg2bv Why do you want my video?
Both a water wheel and this failed turbine are low yield systems. Generators expect high rotation speed, that's a plus for a turbine.
How much this plant
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
What is this music?
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
i like it i had off topic thought today maybe energy put into lift for a hovercraft for example could be a quantum return compared to same power applied to the drive shaft.....
Esse sistema é interessante é assim que às hidrelétrica funciona sabemos que o potencial principal é das hidrelétricas igual a esse equipamento a água do rio é permanente em quanto tiver água tem energia e a Elice na água fica um redemoinho nesse movimento sai energia do gerador com voltage regulada.
needs gears /pulley to get more maybe
Donde se puede comprar
Como evolucionaron las turbinas.No hace mucho existian (en este pais)las 3 aspas del molino eolico
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
I find this video amazing for the lack of the scientific knowledge. An idea is no longer good enough. Hydraulic inventions have to compete with the existing turbines already developed to achieve certain efficiency. Thus able to generate electricity isn't an invention but to generate more than the existing machines should be the goal! Some of the ideas shown here are laughable by scientists and engineers who are trained in this field!
ruclips.net/video/Md5sqdAv6Vg/видео.htmlsi=BNghVQeOpndz4Owg
Unfortunately, hydropower has extremely high investment costs (here approx. 5-20 T$ per kWp), but generates electricity continuously (except during drought).
Due to the extreme drop in prices for solar modules, electricity from hydro and wind power plants is now 3 to 10 times more expensive in comparison.
Today you can buy 400W solar modules for as little as 50-70$.
what happens if a dog or a cat swims into it ?
They swim into minced meat...why?
They wouldnt be swimming out of it.
Francis turbine
За вопросом ответить автор???
this is not good design may be 45 % efficiency
exactly what I am seeing as well.
Catch, all these neat power production devices are being obsolete due to excessive rechargeable devices being produced. In the conversion of energy, it will be required to have ultra high powered constant nuclear power generation in the world of energy storage devices (batteries). Storing energy is not green, how it's generated in the quantities needed to fill all these storage devices in the real factor.
My design is 57 times better. More powerful and more efficient. with a force on the shaft from 20 tons and more to one hundred tons.
@@palych8502 what is your design?