Brilliant. So glad that I discovered your channel, even lay people like me can understand the theories that you put together in this video because you do it in such an approachable and enthusiastic way. My interest in the subject has now been re-awakened. Thank you again.
Hi sir, your videos are great and easy to understand the concepts. Please upload more videos about quantum mechanics especially mathematical Quantum mechanics
I am not used to write a comment on RUclips videos but here I want to say thank you ❤ for this deep explanation. Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart
Thankyou sooo much sir thiss first time in my entire life I'm feeling physics I'm able to relate physics just because of you sir ..... I was this journey will never end and LOVE OF PHYSICS WILL KEEP GROWING ❤
I am paying 4 lakhs per year to my collage , but didn't understand stood a single concept there ....but just in a matter of 22 mins u explained it Clearly as crystal
Hello Professor, is there any particular reason why Davisson and Germer used Nickel crystals? Is it because they have very good reflectivity. Why not use simply NaCl? Do metals reflect electrons better than salts?
sir i literally binge watched your qm series upto here i am loving the way you speak , the way you teach, times when you get excited i get excited to so thank you
String Theory was not a waste of time. Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone. 1/137 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
@@Abhidnya.Deokar Do some research on how you can pack something into a small space, in the same way chromosomes are made up of twisted strands of DNA. There is enough information in the DNA of one human cell to fill a library.
If the Davisson-Gemer experiment surprised you, prepare to have your mind blown by the Double Slit Experiment ruclips.net/video/og7UVNmVQqY/видео.html
Sir, you are amazing you make us understand the toughest concepts of quantum mechanics easily .
yah,perfectly true
Sir, please upload at least 1 video a week. Please
Brilliant. So glad that I discovered your channel, even lay people like me can understand the theories that you put together in this video because you do it in such an approachable and enthusiastic way. My interest in the subject has now been re-awakened. Thank you again.
I love your energy. I love how excited you are about quantum mechanics. ❤
Your explanation is a genuine genius of yours sir..
Salute to you to explain this complicated topic in this way.
🙏
Sir, pls continue this QM series, waiting for ur full course on it
You're a phenomenal teacher
Sir please continue with quantum mechanics series of lecture👏
Very Nice Lecture, understandable the toughest concepts of Quantum Mechanics
Hi sir, your videos are great and easy to understand the concepts. Please upload more videos about quantum mechanics especially mathematical Quantum mechanics
I am not used to write a comment on RUclips videos but here I want to say thank you ❤ for this deep explanation. Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart
This was such an amazing explanation I have heard so far. Thankyou
Great explanation sir. Your love for the subject is reflected in your movements and expressions during teaching.
Thankyou sooo much sir thiss first time in my entire life I'm feeling physics I'm able to relate physics just because of you sir .....
I was this journey will never end and LOVE OF PHYSICS WILL KEEP GROWING ❤
Thank you so much, we enjoy quantum mechanics with great interest, continue assisting us
reallly love the explanation, well explained. great job sir. Your english is also much better than most of the teachers here
I love the way you teach sir ❤
what a beautiful explanation sir ,i enjoyed learning form this sir ,thank you
I am paying 4 lakhs per year to my collage , but didn't understand stood a single concept there ....but just in a matter of 22 mins u explained it Clearly as crystal
Superb explanation
Tq
amazing concept clearity love you u sir , physics is the plan or art of god to create universe , make it work full
Hello Professor, is there any particular reason why Davisson and Germer used Nickel crystals? Is it because they have very good reflectivity. Why not use simply NaCl? Do metals reflect electrons better than salts?
Sir your ascents is tooooooooo nice 😊😊
Sir you are a brilliant teacher love from Pakistan
Hi sir I have a doubt, why particle in a box is sine wave ?
Because the potential inside the box is zero. The solution of the Shrodinger equation gives us sine waves for the wave function.
A: Many to remember.
B: I remember many.
C: 46+1=47=11=2=?
Love the way you teach....
sir please upload the notes of this lecture
sir i literally binge watched your qm series upto here i am loving the way you speak , the way you teach, times when you get excited i get excited to so thank you
really thankful for this great video, but I have small correction that the nickel d=0.91Am not 0.91nm
brilliant explanation👏
Where is the note ?
Love ur passion sir❤
Sir kaafi time k baad ap ne QM pe video upload ki kindly regularly video upload krty rahain we are waiting 😐
Electron waves. Are they transverse or longitudimal waves?
sir have a question why the experimental and deBroglie wavelength not exaclty same?
If I were to answer this,
"0.16 is the same in both means the two digits after decimal are the same."
Sir please upload vdeo on Schrodinger wave equation
Great lecture!
Sir why Xray is used for crystal structure identification. Why didn't electron is used for crystal structure. Pls reply.
Reply the answer of above question if anyone have.
Wavelength of x ray is in A°and also here the interplanar spacing is around 9.1A° since they are comparable enough x rays are used
Please excuse me the inplanar spacing of the crystal is 0.091 nanometers
You should make a textbook!
Fantastic !
Thank you very much
No words only ❤❤❤❤❤
Sir please teach electromagnetism Lorenz force ampere law faraday's law please 🙏 sir thank
Credit goes to Advance Quantum mechanics... dual nature of the light.. esliye explain
Love and respect from Pakistan❤
Thank you so much sir
Excellent, but I am getting d as .91 angstrom
thank you sir
Thank you so much
Please upload the note
What about sound does it also has dual nature
Thanks a lot sir,,i am a big fan of you from Bangladesh. I understand quantum mecahnics Through your Lecture ❤️❤️
thank you
Thanks a lot sir
in fact wav 👏👏👋
thanks sir
Thanks
you good sir
You are the reason I actually stop hating physics.😇
Wuw👏🏻
Any iitian here
From Bhu 😂
@@kamiff4862 I am also from bhu
@@kamiff4862 I am also from iit bhu
From iitr😅😂
Bhu
String Theory was not a waste of time. Geometry is the key to Math and Physics.
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles?
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone. 1/137
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
thanks for this...where can I get the original article ???
@@Abhidnya.Deokar This is the original, which came from me. However, it has been slightly modified during the last year.
@@SpotterVideo wow dude... appreciated 💯
@@Abhidnya.Deokar Do some research on how you can pack something into a small space, in the same way chromosomes are made up of twisted strands of DNA. There is enough information in the DNA of one human cell to fill a library.
There is no such thing as wave-particle duality. There are only people who haven't outgrown silly false dichotomy fallacies. ;-)
Sir your email ID?
Thanks