Wiz Kix - Air 180 Ultramarine 2024 Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Let’s take a deep dive on one of my all time favorite NIKE silhouettes
EDIT on 6.27.24
I got cooked on the comments by a few of yall and it’s actually a good thing. I rushed this review to test out some iMovie stuff and didn’t actually sit and think about what I was going to do with this review. Comparing these to a 2018 NikeiD Ralph Stedman pair is not a great comparison. Also, I messed up on a few things including the name of the shoes smh. The elongated toe in a 12.5 is just too long for me, but upon rewatching this, still looks better than the box cut toe. Still not a fan of this particular pair in the size and with the glue stains. The 2012 pair was my go to maybe I just misremember it 🤷♂️
For someone who loves the Air 180 so much, I think you're making a few mistakes. This is not the Air Max 180, it's the Air 180, as how it was called and released back in '91. Furthermore, you just cannot compare the Steadman's form '18 with the OG from '24. The air bubble is a rock, it's OG. The material isn't suede, it's felt, it's OG. The shape of the Steadman's, however nice and boxy you find it, isn't close to how the OG was, that's what you see on the '24 retro. And last but not least, this is not Infrared, it's Solar Red. And Ultramarine (what's in a name) instead of Ocean blue? I agree the retro from '24 is far from perfect, but please compare it to a shoe it's worth comparing to and take into consideration this retro is closer then ever to the OG Air 180 from '91. Cheers!
@@vandeplantjes sheeeeeesh, you schooled me lol. I can’t even argue any points. Well said.
Last 180s I had were the pimentos 😂
@@Skywalker551 shoot that’s a solid pair
The newer to box looks so much nicer, it’s more similar to the OG. Those other retros you were showing look terrible with the boxy toe. Its supposed to have a sleek and aerodynamic look
@@krizjenner48 to me in smaller sizes it does look better, I agree. Those 12.5s look soooooo long. And yea it’s funny cause once I posted the video I noticed just how boxy those Steadmans look. Kinda wild. Ahwell.
To be fair, it’s a pair I never originally owned because I just never got round to getting them at the time. This time round, I got a pair and in my size…..and it’s a perfect fit to me. I do have a wider foot and it still fit great.
@@punchy72 that’s awesome! I wanted to love my pair but sadly the craftsmanship and fit didn’t work for me.
Love these trainers. I purchased two pairs back in the day. I now have an old pair for kicking around in and a newer pair for summer and shorts combo 😀
@@rustystuff nice! I’m gonna try to size swap for a 12 and beat em up. Think that will do the trick.
Went for the dusty cactus instead nicer colour way
@@Skywalker551 did you actually hit on those?
@@wiz206 yea, they’ve been live on end clothing uk for ages, might even go for a double up
you are right, they are not comfortable, they feel almost like the fake ones.
@@mootantes right? They felt maddddd plasticy
@@wiz206 they still do! Have you bought them directly from Nike or some other seller, because they say they have nothing to do with it if you havent bought them from Nike store
@@wiz206 Also, if you compare them to any previous model you will see the difference from below so called air cushion that is made of transparent plastic in this case lack furrows that it usually has.
@@mootantes absolutely spot on
@@wiz206 youtube has deleted my question, have you bought them from their site or some other seller? non official
How can you possibly say the steadmans toebox looks better
@@craiggorman1685 Was a giant mistake after rewatching. The toe looks AWFUL on video. This just came out brutal. Still don’t like the elongated toe box though
@@wiz206 i get what you mean though with the 2024 it still isnt quite perfect yet
@@craiggorman1685 yea I rushed this video and honestly deserved to get cooked for it lol. I can’t get over how boxy that toe looks on video 🤦♂️😂I still love the color blocking and shape of the 2024, there’s just things about that disappointed me.
@@wiz206 i agree,its as close as weve came to the og yet they still slipped up on a few things,the odd square outline underneath puzzles me