Boeing's Ramjet 155 at AUSA 2021

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 окт 2021
  • Dan Palmeter, Capture Team Lead at Boeing Phantom Works Advanced Weapons, discusses the Ramjet 155 at the Association of the United States Army’s 2021 conference and tradeshow in Washington, DC.

Комментарии • 63

  • @marvinegreen
    @marvinegreen 2 года назад

    Revolutionary

  • @henryzenke949
    @henryzenke949 2 года назад

    If it goes faster than muzzle velocity? The kinetic energy is the warhead.... Just shooting from the hip thought.

  • @Chris-mg3hi
    @Chris-mg3hi Год назад +4

    Made in Norway!

  • @bigallis1
    @bigallis1 2 года назад +14

    Dan does a good job of explaining this next generation of advanced weapons defense coming from Boeing.

  • @springer3783
    @springer3783 2 года назад +5

    At this point is it really an artillery shell and not just a missile fired from an artillery piece

    • @FS-wd3hu
      @FS-wd3hu 2 года назад +6

      It's both

    • @jwadaow
      @jwadaow 2 года назад +2

      Missile is a word that applies to weapons dating back millennia. Artillery has always fired missiles but they haven't normally been guided.

  • @Mediiiicc
    @Mediiiicc 2 года назад +5

    When all the weight is allocated to rocket fuel it doesn't leave much for explosive payload.

    • @jwadaow
      @jwadaow 2 года назад +5

      When all the weight is allocated to fuel there is none allocated to payload.

    • @Clickathon
      @Clickathon 2 года назад +1

      It's not a rocket assisted projectile

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 2 года назад +7

      Ramjet means the oxygen isn't held as weight in the projectile giving it more space for payload.

    • @davidhouseman4328
      @davidhouseman4328 2 года назад +2

      @yo yo hollow isn't extra weight, the point on discussion.

    • @kellymoses8566
      @kellymoses8566 2 года назад +1

      Kinetic energy

  • @exellion82
    @exellion82 2 года назад

    I wonder if this can be made air portable. Like be carried on a centerline a la Brahmos or ALCM.

    • @prfwrx2497
      @prfwrx2497 Год назад +2

      No. The ramjet only helps boost launch velocity from gun launch.

  • @watchthe1369
    @watchthe1369 Год назад

    a massive gyrojet basically only the heat from compressed air burns the propellant to boost the range. I would guess it is shaped like a mortar round with the propellant on the skinny back part and the Kaboom mix in that nosecone?

    • @Lucasxd331
      @Lucasxd331 Год назад

      Not really a Gyrojet. it fires like a normal artillery shell, but activates the ramjet engine mid-air as the speed reaches mach 1. Gyrojets use solid rocket fuel (combustor and oxidizer mix) and boosts the projectile without assistance from gunpowder propellant.

  • @Dzlyesful
    @Dzlyesful Год назад

    How much it costs ?

  • @rajbanwait325
    @rajbanwait325 2 года назад +1

    10th MD

  • @Ade-mu4zn
    @Ade-mu4zn 11 месяцев назад +1

    🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨 1000D

  • @Klote3241
    @Klote3241 6 месяцев назад +1

    Nice seeing Boeing marketing both the Ramjet and the GLSDB missile for the Himars system. We can expect the GLSDB to arrive in Ukraine which will almost double the range of regular himars rockets from 70km to 140km.

    • @GeneralZap
      @GeneralZap 4 месяца назад

      Lol none of this bs is even mass production yet, such a joke

    • @Klote3241
      @Klote3241 4 месяца назад

      @@GeneralZap GLSDB is in mass production as of this year.

  • @jonnekallu1627
    @jonnekallu1627 Год назад +1

    Boeing?
    Isn't that Nammo ammunition?

    • @nuclearTANK
      @nuclearTANK Год назад +1

      It's a joint venture, companies do it every once in awhile to spread the burden out. Boeing is probably doing the avionics and guidance while Nammo is doing the rest

  • @barman_ua
    @barman_ua Год назад +7

    I hope to see it soon in Ukraine. We have a lot of targets to test on, you know.

  • @donsspecialty3961
    @donsspecialty3961 Год назад +1

    Glad Boeing is telling the world about our weapons. The Chinese will never match our capabilities. Famous last words.

    • @nuclearTANK
      @nuclearTANK Год назад

      They already have a hypersonic missiles for killing our CVs, what makes you think they haven't already thought of this. They really wouldn't need it anyways as their battle doctrine is based in home waters and not projecting force abroad like us. Since the Indians already have the Bramos which this looks like this is based off of.

    • @donsspecialty3961
      @donsspecialty3961 Год назад

      @@nuclearTANK lol, a military doctrine is a peace of paper. China is intent on world domination and that will require a change in military doctrine. It’s a matter of time before the doctrine changes to reflect military expansionism.

    • @nuclearTANK
      @nuclearTANK Год назад

      @@donsspecialty3961 that'll never happen we have them pretty much contained at this point, not to mention their population is on the drop they're just like Russian, a paper dragon. They're forces have no capability outside territorial waters. Cyber warfare is the only weapon

  • @generalrodcocker1018
    @generalrodcocker1018 Год назад

    heavy testing in ukraine

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 5 месяцев назад

    '
    great powerful Boeing's Ramjet 155...
    come on american company must make many more better fasttery powerful Boeing's Ramjet 155...
    Boeing's Ramjet 155 can easily hit / destroy any of all ussr russia arms weapons boom down

  • @corey8420
    @corey8420 2 года назад +1

    Seems like he could have taken the mask off for the interview. The mask makes it so difficult to understand him

    • @kellymoses8566
      @kellymoses8566 2 года назад

      No, his accent makes him hard to understand

  • @davidhouseman4328
    @davidhouseman4328 2 года назад

    The American accent isn't great for selling the "best". I'm so use to hyperbole in it, I'm sure it's great but I'm less sure because of the accent.

  • @maheshdeore4010
    @maheshdeore4010 Год назад

    ONLY MARKETING
    But HIMARS are ineffective in RUSSIA
    😇😇😇

    • @Lucasxd331
      @Lucasxd331 Год назад

      If it was ineffective, then the Russians would have destroyed one by now.
      And these shells are not for the HIMARS, they will be used in Howitzers.

  • @ISSH-nu7rn
    @ISSH-nu7rn 2 года назад

    Brahmos, little copy.

    • @ISSH-nu7rn
      @ISSH-nu7rn 2 года назад

      @Sampa Norein go and check!

    • @mastermariner490
      @mastermariner490 2 года назад +11

      @@ISSH-nu7rn Ramjets have been around for over 100 years,Einstein

    • @ISSH-nu7rn
      @ISSH-nu7rn 2 года назад

      @@mastermariner490 And I bet US did it first,right?!

    • @mastermariner490
      @mastermariner490 2 года назад +2

      @@ISSH-nu7rn No it was actually a French inventor in 1913 and a Hungarian in 1915

    • @praveenranndika5083
      @praveenranndika5083 2 года назад +1

      P800 ramjet powerd missile older than brahamos missile 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕