I'm on a journey to discover what couldn't understand back then, when I was in architecture school. Going through your brings back memories and I'm understanding what i learnt through past 10 years. Thank you for re ignition of my passion for architecture.
I would love to have a mentor like you. I've always thought the same thing about architecture. While most other students admire super modern buildings, I'd be looking at Niemeyer's Brasilia, or the Crystal Palace in London, or The Paris Opera House, as well as many restaurants built in Havana's countryside. I've always liked the idea of form as a way for art to create a space for function. I'm not obsessed with Neo-classical or anything like that. There's much to be said about modern architecture, particularly that everything has a function. The problem I see is that many new buildings seem to be about pleasing clients who strictly follow the trends, and not a unique creation that every building calls for, a unique work of art. Everything looks like everything else.
Thanks so much! Yes, I agree. Modernism has been around for more than 100 years now, and it is high time we move beyond it. Thinking about 'simultaneous space' is one way to go beyond pure functionalism.
Are you from Cuba? Tell us more about those countryside restaurants? What about the unfinished School of Performance Arts in Havana? It is one of my favorite architectural utopian projects ever.
This is fundamental for parametric architecture. It's too good to be true but here it is. The knowledge is served properly. I can't thank you enough for this.
Great presentation! Starting at 10:59, I recalled 'Mythologies' by Roland Barthes and was impressed by the inclusion of semiotics in architecture. Thank you.
My tutor says i need to improve my understanding of architectural form. As an Architectural technologist, architecture as an art baffles me, and after watching a few videos about forms, they all seem to convey ideas in a hocus pocus way - but your one makes makes sense to me, the use of overlaying modern forms over historical forms simultaneously, like the modern column over the traditional Greek column for example. I just need someone to explain something in plain English to me who has a scientific mindset.
I watched your vid on architecture because I enjoy the subject, but I also found myself learning how to draw a purely functional diagram and turn it into a floor plan and how the architect can use tracing paper to tackle the various challenges of design that flourishes by creativity. I been studying bits and pieces for a while but the first few beginning steps always evaded me. Thanks.
"architects should continue to draw and make physical models, this helps architects to remember that spatial design is the core of architectural practice" -Robert Architecture
Wow, you could do hours on this topic and it would be fascinating. Why have I never heard this terminology before? I have heard about breaking the box and compression/release but this is a whole new area of insight. More please. Also a request --- delve into cognitive architecture ala Ann Sussmann. Thank you and carry on.🙂🙂🙂💯❤️
Wit lot of career breaks left working in the field if architecture. And as I couldnot work with those packages like revit and all..with heavy heart stopped working.. now your videos are bringing back my passion fir architecture. Not sure if I will ever work in architecture field but happy watching your videos. Thankyou.
Just discovered your videos and for an architecture student, what a discover ! It is so simply explained and showed. As a pencil lover, I can't agree more with you and the use of drawing. If only all teacher could learn from your method !
So much effort was put into intellectual jargon, yet so little in actually making what's beautiful. This is evident from the pure fact of modern architecture, art deco being an exception.
Dude, it's not about postmodernism. Postmodernism is a tool of search for the subject. Any era is like that. Fundamental to this is the need, desire and desire for knowledge. We have been doing this our entire existence. Everything you brought is very cool, but these elements stand upside down. Congratulations and respect, you are well done, I am without a joke. friend, I'm sorry if I'm addressing you so simply, maybe even familiarly - but this is life, we are people, I only wish to share knowledge - what we all strive for - communication )))
Thank you so much for this insightful video! I have not ever heard space explained in such a way. As a graduate student, I can attest to how the computer has taken over how we design spaces to much detriment. I am a huge proponent of physical models and sketching to inform how we develop space. Only after should it enter the digital realm. Sadly, many of my colleagues don't draw or like to make models.
Thanks! Yes, I think there is a lot of architectural knowledge being lost because folks are just jumping on the computer and not putting the time in to understand the concepts behind space.
I miss the days of tracing paper and drawing . i think most firms now that are not in high design tend to get rid of it all together. I started developing a habit of every morning at work to take out my trace and sketch some random doodles for 10 min. then 10 min i browse architecture websites. I feel that that keeps my brain stimulated with what is going on in architecture, instead of the office environment.
Its applied art. There are no theories since nothing is provable but only ideas. Only pretend man made (screwed up as much as man is capable of) complexity since art does not need to make sense
15:06 I’m not sure that’s accurate. I think the complexity of space is determined by the type of surveillance that the client would prefer. Passive surveillance requires high volumes of people using the space so the more ambiguous it is the more likely people will be able to use it. As with overlapping housing and retail. Active surveillance favours simple space because it’s easier for security guards to identify who belongs and who does not. I think they exist in equal measure, typically prestigious European firms value hybrid spaces. Perhaps highly commercial interests favour simple space. Love your content btw. Thank you 😄
An important issue that perhaps you did not mention is that classical architecture spatial expressions fell under its own weight due to the important changes in uses after the Industrial Revolution. New programs were needed to which classical architecture could no longer respond. The validity of spatial proposals are too closely linked to the possibilities of responding, from material resources, to the new behabiors and uses. Spatial expression and social interaction do not belong only to postmodernism
linked space was not invented by michel angelo, you can see this type of simultaneous space in the ruins of the Mayas where they put three temples sourrounding a big square. It was the hearth of their citys and their trade market. And a good example for historical but modern space is Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana by Lapadula, beautiful building.
The photos and drawings you're using in your video, do you pay for them or are they royalty free? I'm planning on starting a YT channel and I could use tips on where to get my content?
I do the drawings and watercolors myself and clean them up in Photoshop. I uses Storyblocks for video 'B-Roll', music, and sound effects. I also use Epidemic sound for some music. Some pictures I take myself, and some are fair use. I try not to use copyrighted material, and there are a lot of fair use photos online.
uiuiui.....Pier Luigi Nervi and Frank Gehry shoulder on shoulder in a list...*gg)) Nervi's buildings follow the principle "form follows function" in a perfekt and artistic way - that is architecture as its best! .....And Gehry? He is a sculptor, produces cute walk-in objekts with fake applications on contents that he is not interested in. As an architect myself I am sorry that this is a tendency nowadays.
This is false, simultaneous space still exists in current architecture, as in Fujimoto's House N which takes up the traditional concept through a primitive architecture which generates an unprecedented architecture.
What I hate about some architects is that they are trying desperately complicate things, or call things with words far more difficult than required. I am an architect myself, but it was always an annoying thing for me in this field. It's like trying to cover up the fact that it really isn't all that complicated. Most of the time. "Simultaneous Space In Architecture" / "Infinity" :D - so U thinking a two rectangles overlapping on a plan - like a kitchen with the living room? :D case closed. Be humble. Don't act like you are an astro physicist.
Although I agree architects sometimes get lost in abstract theory, sometimes it is useful in thinking about problems. The term 'Simultaneous Space' comes from philosopher Henri Lefebvre. He uses it to mean multi-functional spaces where history and use are overlayed over each other. In architecture and city planning this is sometimes called a 'palimpsest' where multiple layers are scrapped off and incompletely erased. The problem with Modern architecture is it tries to create single-use spaces dividing up a building and the city into single-use zones. Multi-functional spaces are created when architects go beyond the functional adjacency diagram, and start thinking about spaces that have simultaneous uses. Bernard Tschumi is perhaps the best known architect who uses this concept in his work.
Way too involved/intellectual = complexity beyond comprehension = not architecture. There is only one thing that counts in architecture = if it feels good, it is good; as such, people will pay enough for its use to justify its cost = it makes a profit (if not, do not build it = duh) - bi-nocular humans assign axis to each space and to each piece of stuff that defines that space because that is the most efficient way to process the information - keeping all those axis in balance makes the places feel good, sometimes allowing great architecture to sneak in (usually just before the C of O is issued). I have designed all - great, good and oops - and learned the difference from doing = there is no other way except to study the Beaux-Arts way of design and get competent in those simple forms, then push the boundaries, leaving less oops along the way = KISS.
Good comment apart from the profit part. All the architectural monstrosities were not made because they were good and people wanted them, but because those who had money to finance them wanted to have them. To understand what I mean, you have to educate yourself on the nature of Frankfurt school and ethnicity of people behind it.
Its applied art. There are no theories since nothing is provable but only ideas. Only pretend man made (screwed up as much as man is capable of) complexity since art does not need to make sense
Architects are constantly patting themselves on the back lol. They only care about their image among their peers, they never care about real world problems. While you're busy being *artistic* engineers solve the real problems of the society.
Defining space is humanity’s failure. How can you DEFINE something that you do not FULLY understand yet?? We seek to define things that we don’t understand.🤟❤️
I'm on a journey to discover what couldn't understand back then, when I was in architecture school.
Going through your brings back memories and I'm understanding what i learnt through past 10 years. Thank you for re ignition of my passion for architecture.
Thanks so much!
I would love to have a mentor like you. I've always thought the same thing about architecture. While most other students admire super modern buildings, I'd be looking at Niemeyer's Brasilia, or the Crystal Palace in London, or The Paris Opera House, as well as many restaurants built in Havana's countryside. I've always liked the idea of form as a way for art to create a space for function. I'm not obsessed with Neo-classical or anything like that. There's much to be said about modern architecture, particularly that everything has a function. The problem I see is that many new buildings seem to be about pleasing clients who strictly follow the trends, and not a unique creation that every building calls for, a unique work of art. Everything looks like everything else.
Thanks so much! Yes, I agree. Modernism has been around for more than 100 years now, and it is high time we move beyond it. Thinking about 'simultaneous space' is one way to go beyond pure functionalism.
@@robertsarchitecture❤
My lecturer once said - he heard “architecture was the art of wasting space”. I think that’s why modernism tries to cram function into every space.
Are you from Cuba? Tell us more about those countryside restaurants? What about the unfinished School of Performance Arts in Havana? It is one of my favorite architectural utopian projects ever.
This is fundamental for parametric architecture. It's too good to be true but here it is. The knowledge is served properly. I can't thank you enough for this.
This is the best video explaining architecture I've seen in 10 years
Primera vez que comienzo a entender todo lo que quizás intentaron explicarme en la universidad. Muchas gracias por el video!! Genio!
Your work is so valuable, I wonder how this content with such effort can be for free... thanks for your efforts 🙏🏻♥️
Thank you so much 😀
Great presentation! Starting at 10:59, I recalled 'Mythologies' by Roland Barthes and was impressed by the inclusion of semiotics in architecture. Thank you.
My tutor says i need to improve my understanding of architectural form. As an Architectural technologist, architecture as an art baffles me, and after watching a few videos about forms, they all seem to convey ideas in a hocus pocus way - but your one makes makes sense to me, the use of overlaying modern forms over historical forms simultaneously, like the modern column over the traditional Greek column for example. I just need someone to explain something in plain English to me who has a scientific mindset.
Thanks! I am glad my video makes sense to you!
that was a fantastic speed run of architectural design. Brilliant.
just found your channel at the end of my final college, I feel regretful but very thankful at the same time
I watched your vid on architecture because I enjoy the subject, but I also found myself learning how to draw a purely functional diagram and turn it into a floor plan and how the architect can use tracing paper to tackle the various challenges of design that flourishes by creativity. I been studying bits and pieces for a while but the first few beginning steps always evaded me. Thanks.
Why did I not find this channel before? Every video is perfect.
"architects should continue to draw and make physical models, this helps architects to remember that spatial design is the core of architectural practice" -Robert Architecture
This video was excellent for upcoming architectural students.
Yes, you did lot of hard work to present it. Thank you
Thanks
Thanks so much!
Amazing content. Keep up the good work, there are no yt channels out there like this
Wow, you could do hours on this topic and it would be fascinating. Why have I never heard this terminology before? I have heard about breaking the box and compression/release but this is a whole new area of insight. More please. Also a request --- delve into cognitive architecture ala Ann Sussmann. Thank you and carry on.🙂🙂🙂💯❤️
Thanks! Will do!
Wit lot of career breaks left working in the field if architecture. And as I couldnot work with those packages like revit and all..with heavy heart stopped working.. now your videos are bringing back my passion fir architecture. Not sure if I will ever work in architecture field but happy watching your videos. Thankyou.
Glad to find an American architect posting about the field. 30X40 workshop and Henry Gao are also spreading the good, bad and ugly of the field.
Thanks so much!
Such an amazing vedio I learn so much from your vedios that I'm not thought in architecture school.
Thank you.
Just discovered your videos and for an architecture student, what a discover ! It is so simply explained and showed. As a pencil lover, I can't agree more with you and the use of drawing. If only all teacher could learn from your method !
Nice content. Revit is just a tool to model and document the building, it is not a tool to conceive the project, in my humble opinion.
So much effort was put into intellectual jargon, yet so little in actually making what's beautiful. This is evident from the pure fact of modern architecture, art deco being an exception.
fascinating lesson on Space-Thanx Yo!
Dude, it's not about postmodernism. Postmodernism is a tool of search for the subject. Any era is like that. Fundamental to this is the need, desire and desire for knowledge. We have been doing this our entire existence. Everything you brought is very cool, but these elements stand upside down. Congratulations and respect, you are well done, I am without a joke.
friend, I'm sorry if I'm addressing you so simply, maybe even familiarly - but this is life, we are people, I only wish to share knowledge - what we all strive for - communication )))
Thanks.
Impressive!… Thank you for preparing this video!
Absolutely fascinating. Thank you
this is very vital
i was curious about this theme
GRACIAS!! por compartir..... has creado un espacio de sabiduria ..... donde se puede seguir alimentando nuestra pasión.
I taught this but for two dimensional design happy to no in Architectural space thanks
I can't find a way of thanking you. Keep going.
Thank you so much for this insightful video! I have not ever heard space explained in such a way. As a graduate student, I can attest to how the computer has taken over how we design spaces to much detriment. I am a huge proponent of physical models and sketching to inform how we develop space. Only after should it enter the digital realm. Sadly, many of my colleagues don't draw or like to make models.
Thanks! Yes, I think there is a lot of architectural knowledge being lost because folks are just jumping on the computer and not putting the time in to understand the concepts behind space.
thank you very much for your wonderful informative videos! subbed :)
Great Great lecture. hank you Sir!
Amazing content 🙌🏻
Thank you for this video
And what’s the brand of your pen btw please ?
Thanks. I typically draw with a cheap Lamy Safari EF fountain pen because I use waterproof ink. If it clogs the pen it is easy to clean or replace.
I really love your diagrams.
Thank you very much! Amazing content! It would be helpful when showing a building to display the name of it or the Architect.
Great suggestion!
Excellent
amazing, thank you.
Ey yo whats the background music? its kinda dope ngl.
very interesting
great video😊
I miss the days of tracing paper and drawing . i think most firms now that are not in high design tend to get rid of it all together. I started developing a habit of every morning at work to take out my trace and sketch some random doodles for 10 min. then 10 min i browse architecture websites. I feel that that keeps my brain stimulated with what is going on in architecture, instead of the office environment.
Great idea to have a daily routine of drawing.
Its applied art. There are no theories since nothing is provable but only ideas. Only pretend man made (screwed up as much as man is capable of) complexity since art does not need to make sense
Thank you!
Very good definitions
Thank youuuu🫂🫡
15:06 I’m not sure that’s accurate. I think the complexity of space is determined by the type of surveillance that the client would prefer.
Passive surveillance requires high volumes of people using the space so the more ambiguous it is the more likely people will be able to use it. As with overlapping housing and retail.
Active surveillance favours simple space because it’s easier for security guards to identify who belongs and who does not.
I think they exist in equal measure, typically prestigious European firms value hybrid spaces. Perhaps highly commercial interests favour simple space.
Love your content btw. Thank you 😄
With all lovely information it’s still important the drainage and water supply and electricity all can’t be forgotten
impressive content..
Thanks!
good job i like it !
An important issue that perhaps you did not mention is that classical architecture spatial expressions fell under its own weight due to the important changes in uses after the Industrial Revolution. New programs were needed to which classical architecture could no longer respond. The validity of spatial proposals are too closely linked to the possibilities of responding, from material resources, to the new behabiors and uses. Spatial expression and social interaction do not belong only to postmodernism
Yes. Definitely!
is this the same with spatial overlapping
Yes!
Yes psyography light and shade must be noted
linked space was not invented by michel angelo, you can see this type of simultaneous space in the ruins of the Mayas where they put three temples sourrounding a big square. It was the hearth of their citys and their trade market.
And a good example for historical but modern space is Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana by Lapadula, beautiful building.
This video is like the end of era😢
what name of background music?
I use Storyblocks. It is the "Linguist Theme".
The photos and drawings you're using in your video, do you pay for them or are they royalty free? I'm planning on starting a YT channel and I could use tips on where to get my content?
I do the drawings and watercolors myself and clean them up in Photoshop. I uses Storyblocks for video 'B-Roll', music, and sound effects. I also use Epidemic sound for some music. Some pictures I take myself, and some are fair use. I try not to use copyrighted material, and there are a lot of fair use photos online.
❤
What school did you go to?
I went to Massachusetts College of Art for my undergraduate degree, and University of Washington for my M.Arch.
by far kitchen/dining is more central in USA
Now this is the stuff midjourney can’t do.
uiuiui.....Pier Luigi Nervi and Frank Gehry shoulder on shoulder in a list...*gg)) Nervi's buildings follow the principle "form follows function" in a perfekt and artistic way - that is architecture as its best! .....And Gehry? He is a sculptor, produces cute walk-in objekts with fake applications on contents that he is not interested in. As an architect myself I am sorry that this is a tendency nowadays.
😮😮😮😮😮😮
This is false, simultaneous space still exists in current architecture, as in Fujimoto's House N which takes up the traditional concept through a primitive architecture which generates an unprecedented architecture.
WoW!
How to lose a simple concept in Intellectual mumbo-jumbo.
What I hate about some architects is that they are trying desperately complicate things, or call things with words far more difficult than required. I am an architect myself, but it was always an annoying thing for me in this field. It's like trying to cover up the fact that it really isn't all that complicated. Most of the time. "Simultaneous Space In Architecture" / "Infinity" :D - so U thinking a two rectangles overlapping on a plan - like a kitchen with the living room? :D case closed. Be humble. Don't act like you are an astro physicist.
Although I agree architects sometimes get lost in abstract theory, sometimes it is useful in thinking about problems.
The term 'Simultaneous Space' comes from philosopher Henri Lefebvre. He uses it to mean multi-functional spaces where history and use are overlayed over each other. In architecture and city planning this is sometimes called a 'palimpsest' where multiple layers are scrapped off and incompletely erased. The problem with Modern architecture is it tries to create single-use spaces dividing up a building and the city into single-use zones. Multi-functional spaces are created when architects go beyond the functional adjacency diagram, and start thinking about spaces that have simultaneous uses.
Bernard Tschumi is perhaps the best known architect who uses this concept in his work.
Way too involved/intellectual = complexity beyond comprehension = not architecture. There is only one thing that counts in architecture = if it feels good, it is good; as such, people will pay enough for its use to justify its cost = it makes a profit (if not, do not build it = duh) - bi-nocular humans assign axis to each space and to each piece of stuff that defines that space because that is the most efficient way to process the information - keeping all those axis in balance makes the places feel good, sometimes allowing great architecture to sneak in (usually just before the C of O is issued). I have designed all - great, good and oops - and learned the difference from doing = there is no other way except to study the Beaux-Arts way of design and get competent in those simple forms, then push the boundaries, leaving less oops along the way = KISS.
Good comment apart from the profit part. All the architectural monstrosities were not made because they were good and people wanted them, but because those who had money to finance them wanted to have them. To understand what I mean, you have to educate yourself on the nature of Frankfurt school and ethnicity of people behind it.
Send me arictecte
Its applied art. There are no theories since nothing is provable but only ideas. Only pretend man made (screwed up as much as man is capable of) complexity since art does not need to make sense
The more videos i watch on architecture the more disappointed i am with how much you're paid.
Wrong
Architects are constantly patting themselves on the back lol. They only care about their image among their peers, they never care about real world problems. While you're busy being *artistic* engineers solve the real problems of the society.
Defining space is humanity’s failure.
How can you DEFINE something that you do not FULLY understand yet??
We seek to define things that we don’t understand.🤟❤️
Ukraine