You are outdated... The PC world is about 1 billion people... while the smartphone world is about 7 billion people... Yes, PCs work well, but smartphones work even better.
Hahaha! The comments in the comment section are fantastic! This is correct! This is just a fishing boat, don't worry! The construction of aircraft carriers 004 and 005 has started simultaneously, and the construction of two 076 unmanned aerial vehicle carriers equipped with electromagnetic catapults has also begun in Shanghai. It is possible to conduct sea trials from 2024 to 2025. I hope you can convey to the rulers of your country not to worry, they are just fishing boats.❤🎉❤
As a Chinese and based on the information of the Chinese Internet made a little summary: 1. The aircraft carrier Liaoning, formerly a Soviet-made aircraft carrier, was completely demilitarized and almost an empty shell when it arrived in China, and engineers spent years repairing it, the significance of which is to research and verify the technology 2. The Shandong, a Chinese-made replica of the Liaoning, is significant in confirming China's ability to build aircraft carriers from scratch 3. The Fujian aircraft carrier, after learning how to walk and run, began to study electromagnetic catapult technology to catch up with the first echelon, and the Fujian will become the main force of the current Chinese Navy and the template for the future Chinese aircraft carrier
I'm happy to see them waste tons of money on something that will be of little strategic value to them. They won't dare put their status symbol where it could be threatened. Much like the Russians Su-57s.
@@神可汗 The US, unlike the CCP respects the freedom of the seas. We don't have a tantrum and shoot missiles into the water to kill fish if someone passes near our territorial waters.
@@神可汗China is well aware that we won’t let an invasion of Taiwan slide like that. This is why they are scared to invade. Attacking the main supplier of US semiconductor (Taiwan) would be like declaring war
Our aircraft carrier is just a fishing boat, used for fishing, not fighting. We can't even compare with the Indian aircraft carrier, let alone the United States. Please don't stare at China every day. We were invaded from 1840 to 1965, and we just wanted to live a better life.
@@_Chad_ThunderCock In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
@@outman1923 I don't question Chinas ability to create the world's powerful fleet. I just think they want to be very methodological, so they can develop a very capable nuclear carrier fleet and that's going to take a bit of time.
Well it should cost a lot less as it's not nuclear - the UK went own the same route, but it does limit how far it can go and how long it can remain on station when it gets there. I would imagine the use case for this ship is staying within the south China sea so it should be fine, but it wouldn't be able sail to the Mediterranean and run a year long operation against an adversary - unlike the US carriers which can and do do that.
Length of the video is fine, but I don't like videos presented in a vertical format. I watch YT primarily on a PC and TV. When I do occasionally watch on a phone, I always turn it sideways to give more clarity of details on the screen.
The new style is not to my taste but I'm just here for the content. You guys do what you need to - I'll be here. Thankfully listening only is always an option !
It's literally got a steam turbine engine. It's using an outdated catapult system and still has yet to do any real display of capability besides not falling apart instantly, which with the way their belt and road work goes is an accomplishment itself.
Dose anyone noticed there are lots of wheel tracks around the catapults? All the three catapults are full covered by those tracks, they should have already launched many times.
The new format isn't bad, just needs some work. It won't be appropriate for all topics. When you show maps and info graphs I prefer the full screen layout. Never stop experimenting.
@@carty200 Exactly. This latest carrier is a tofu dreg copy of the mighty Nimitz class carrier, but run with substandard old-fashioned tech by the Chinese. The US will wipe them out easily.
Question? Technically isn't 1 of those carriers an old Ukrainian or USSR air craft carrier? Does China have any Nuclear powered air craft carriers? How many people does this take to be operational? 20,000? How many aircraft can it contain? Doesn't China only have 1 base or port in the world?
I can answer some. The Liaoning was originally the Riga, built in Ukraine for the Soviet navy. The Shandong was built domestically as a modified version of Riga's design. The Fujian is a new design for China. None of them are nuclear-powered, which could mean the EMALS system would have a slower launch rate (fewer aircraft per minute) than if it were powered by a nuclear reactor.
For ports, China is expanding its influence abroad and currently looking to develop ports/facilities in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Djibouti that could be adapted for use in resupplying their navy.
Power projection is also not particularly in China's strategic concerns currently, it's much more control over the chinese sea? For protection of world trade, the goals and interests are fairly similar with the West and it's that many costs avoided, right?
Well it helps to be second biggest economy in the world and not be ashamed that your success is based on you being a developing country. If China has 3 aircraft carriers and a space program I say they are a developed country and they should have to play with the big boys.
Indians have a very strong odor. It is so sad. A friend of mine cries whenever she realizes that people start smelling her at work then she would go to the rest room sit there and cry.
In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
I wonder how many years until the war happens. Not like this thing is very dangerous, but still it is unlikely carriers will be involved in a Taiwan invasion and it will be land based planes. The ex-Russian carriers with the bent decks are no more than amphibious support ships nowadays
Aircraft carriers are pretty much obsolete due to hypersonic missiles. I'm sure China has a use for them tho. Such as for large-scale rescue missions due to catastrophic natural disasters and maybe some aspects of defence.
Aircraft carriers are still missiles platforms, although its their planes who carries the missiles and extend their range. So no, they are still not obsolete, because your ground missiles cant reach everywhere.
In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
LOL. At first I thought you were joking. Sorry to break it to you, Jack Sparrow and all those other pesky Anglo- Saxon pirates are fictional. It is just a movie.
What about type 004? Didn't south China morning post reported that its construction started back in late 2021? No idea whether that article is reliable or not.
Wow, someone who's asking a real question. SCMP is a mixed bag, there is reason to believe they're relatively independent and also that they're falling more and more under the control of the CCP. But its not a tabloid, its solid in the sense they're not likely to be reporting things that are just flat-out false. Whether or not someone told them what to say (or what not to say). I'm not sure about the exact article you're referencing but I believe the latest info coming from western open-source stuff is they have 2 carriers under construction.
This really isn't the best wiki page, closer to one of the worst, but its a start, and if you're spending 5 min to read they're articles, its worth 5 min to read who they are. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Morning_Post#:~:text=The%20SCMP%20prints%20paper%20editions,is%20blocked%20in%20mainland%20China.
Do you think the keel of an aircraft carrier was transformed in one day? When you see the keel frame design, it has been under construction for more than 2 years.
@@celestialatheist Hard to see one being so smart like you nowadays, I cannot imagine what expression does your mother have when she gave birth to you.
@@leminion3097 except you know, build the worlds largest and most capable carrier fleet and equip them with the best carrier aircraft the world has to offer. China will still be relying on the less than ideal J-15 for the foreseeable future.
@@alexalbrecht5768 I don't think it's difficult for u to open the message of J35 by yourself. In fact, it has been tested on the ship for a long time, and it may have a stronger ability than the F35. Call this potential war weapon a cheap imitation, and put away ur arrogance and pay attention to this enemy.😂
China have been into MagLev technology for many years now. The EM catapult as PLA called it, is a derivative of MagLev. Instead of pulling coach, it just need to pull jets to a speed required for take off. Unlike USA that don't have the experience... Further DC EM catapult is better to manipulate the Votage and Current to give a gentle and control acceleration tp redice pilot stress and stress to the airframes.
Assuming it works. EM Catapults aren't as reliable as steam catapults and that's very much the reason why the US hasn't made the jump so far, despite testing it.
@@daveboy2000 Are you an engineer?? Do you know how the steam zipper works? .. There is a lot of maintainance issue. EM. Catapult like MagLev no contact on the tracks.. Gliding above tracks using magnetic field. No WEAR and TEAR. How ia steam better thsn EM catapult?? Is your Stream Trains better than MagLev train?? Which run faster?
@@daveboy2000 Dont think highly of USA... They are degrading technologically.. There are no bew product nor new innovations coming out from USA nowadys. Back to EM, why USA not successful. They DONT have the Know How??? Even today USA have not fielded a hypersonic missile while China already fielded in PLA army 8 years ago.
@@daveboy2000 Why US failed in EMALz?? USA don't have the know how.. USA is no longer leader im innovation and new technology breakthrough. All these are accomplish by China. That is a fact. Hypersonic race US also lose to China.
@@NathansWargamesAmerican warships are no different. If Iran can overwhelm Israeli bases that is amongst the most heavily defended skies in the world with drones and old missile, the Chinese can inflict even greater damage on the entire carrier strike group.
EMALS on a conventional propulsion ?? unless they develop or conquer ports around the world, they won´t be able to go very far without a large fleet of supply ships...
You clearly have no idea about fujian like most people. China have skipped a whole generation of carrier. They wouldnt invest 13 billion on a carrier that doesnt work. Fujian is indeed more capable than the ford in performing the emals. It is more energy efficient.
If you have passed your middle school physic exams, you should know there is no problem of a conventional carrier with EMALS. The only thing matter is energy efficiency. Actually EMALS has better efficiency than steam catapuls, like those in Kitty Hawk class carrier. In a steam catapuls carrier, you need to consume energy to heat water and than use the energy of steam power to accelerate aircraft. Most of the energy were lost during this process. EMALS use eletric power to accelerate aircraft, energy lost during the process is much fewer than stem catapuls. Steam catapuls work well in US convential carrier. So EMALS will work even better. In other words, EMALS consume less energy than steam catapuls per launch. And because the EMALS in Fujian are using DC. So in theory they have even better efficiency than AC EMALS which were installed in US carrier Ford.
So much American cope in the comments on any vid about this carrier. Quit thinking with your little head for a second and consider what it is and what it's for. China's not the US: China is a continental power, with big land borders and a fundamental interest in the new silk road (the belt and road). Think about where China's interests are and where and how they might deploy this kind of asset. Dollars to cents it's not the kernel of a blue water navy to challenge the USN in the mid Pacific.
Correct China is a continental power in history is littered with the ruins of Continental Powers who over invested trying to build a blue water Navy to have things both ways. Turns out you pretty much have to pick one of the other as a country. Got little Powers who build babies generally bankrupt themselves
Building a carrier is one thing, that's just hardware and can be copied from other people. Learning how to use one is another thing altogether. The US has a 100 year head start there.
@@Mishn0so you would advise chna not to build the carrier bcoz U5 with almost full 100 yrs of war experience is no threat to chna. Also the country with d most powerful destructive institution like C1A will not be used against chna? No? Why not live in peace, world is big enough for all and let's take good care of our planet earth.
Human eyes go from Left to Right, not Top to Bottom. No reason to make vertical videos a even in watching on phone, phone can be oriented Left to Right.
you're bucking the common, modern trend, like it or not that is how most people view on mobile, and he flat out said he is trying to keep up with trends
@@yikemoo Lemmings follow trends. I understand the why, but maybe folks watch videos vertically on phones because they are produced in a vertical manner. If they were produced horizontally, folks would simply turn their phones 90 degrees. Either way, he makes good content.
Nicely done. I wonder if the smol carrier borne AWACS they were developing is finished. Also don’t they need to add a catapult hook for all the J15s this is going to operate?
Blinkov is one of the best analysts ive ever come across hes very unbiased hes neither pro western or anti western like most analysts unfortunately though the comments are always filled with pro western idiots
Re: in ten years Nah!!! The Chinese are not out to compete with anyone. Their objective is absolutely “no Iraq, no Libya, no Syria, no Kosovo, and, no Vietnam War for them and… They are working towards making sure events like that don’t get any chance to happen to them… Sometimes however they are not at liberty to guaranteed that nothing like that will ever happen to them… .
Where are you getting your info from? China is likely to produce 10 carriers before the U.S. even buys the long-lead items for the next Ford class scheduled. I thought you guys were all "yeah but carriers are useless because of anti-ship missiles"
@@yikemoo The shipbuilding speed in China is more than 200 times that of the United States, according to this year's news. If a war were to break out, theoretically, China could build over 200 aircraft carriers in the time it takes the United States to construct one. Times have changed.
@@yikemoo hes not exagerating. China has 232 times the US shipbuilding capacity and accounts for more than 50% of the whole worlds shipbuilding capability.
I don't think they need or want 10 carriers. They just need enough to defend move out to 2nd island chain and to defend their lines of communications. Each carrier is exorbitant to build and maintain even for China and it is a waste of money that can be used to build uplift more people out of poverty and to invest in productive things.
Fujian, the characters literally mean “Lucky Construction”, and name of a province. But I know what you meant. But here is my advice: underestimate China at west’s own peril.
. My call on what’s going on: This boat, type 003, CV-18, is nothing… Speculations abound, words in the street is that they have plans for *a super container ship and other marine vessels using thorium reactor* as the power source. This in turn leads me to believe that once this technology is matured enough (under going actual tests on smaller sized communities right now in the country) that they will refit all four carriers, the 001, 002, 003 (and an additional 003 now in progress) with this power source which is why they still build them using conventional power sources. Not only that, but, as we speak, chatters www abound, two 004 class nuclear power CV’s have already started, simoutanously, in two distinct yards as plans are being drawn up for an addition ten boats of different tonnages all likely to br powered by thorium now by 2045 timeframe… And, by that logic, we can assume that they will start fielding their Aegis and other naval systems with the same power source due to the safety aspect of thorium reactors over others power sources. Only logical you know. They are waiting for thorium. .
The new format works well on mobile, I watch mostly on pc though
short formats are ruining youtube
@@ibraced1243 +1
You are outdated... The PC world is about 1 billion people... while the smartphone world is about 7 billion people... Yes, PCs work well, but smartphones work even better.
Hahaha! The comments in the comment section are fantastic! This is correct! This is just a fishing boat, don't worry! The construction of aircraft carriers 004 and 005 has started simultaneously, and the construction of two 076 unmanned aerial vehicle carriers equipped with electromagnetic catapults has also begun in Shanghai. It is possible to conduct sea trials from 2024 to 2025. I hope you can convey to the rulers of your country not to worry, they are just fishing boats.❤🎉❤
😂😂😂👍👍
This is just a fishing boat for propaganda. Even if it isn't The US Navy has 11 better ones. Sleep well
@@DominusHydra40k Six aircraft carriers in the United States are older than Kuznetsov class carriers🤡
type 004 will be interesting, type 003 seems to be a proving ground for building their own designs and carrier ops
I don't know they are play all the card the Soviets did before collapsing just watch china they are the sick man of the big economies.
Agreed, it's literally a fishing ship.
The narrow screen format sucks!
Guys, at least it's better than Admiral Kusnetsov!
We can tell it's better because it's not on fire. The second half of this decade is going to be "interesting times."
That's not saying much.
作为中国人并根据中文互联网的信息做了一点总结：
1. 辽宁号航母，其前身是苏联产航母，运到中国时被完全去军事化几乎是一艘空壳，工程师花了多年修复它，意义在于研究和验证技术
2. 山东号航母，由中国制造，辽宁号的复制品，意义在于确认中国有能力从头开始建造航母
3. 福建号航母，在学习了如何行走和奔跑后，开始研究电磁弹射技术，追赶第一梯队，福建号将成为目前中国海军的主力，和未来中国航母的模板
Speak English boy
Quite commie
@@wisenG771or u can just translate
As a Chinese and based on the information of the Chinese Internet made a little summary: 1. The aircraft carrier Liaoning, formerly a Soviet-made aircraft carrier, was completely demilitarized and almost an empty shell when it arrived in China, and engineers spent years repairing it, the significance of which is to research and verify the technology 2. The Shandong, a Chinese-made replica of the Liaoning, is significant in confirming China's ability to build aircraft carriers from scratch 3. The Fujian aircraft carrier, after learning how to walk and run, began to study electromagnetic catapult technology to catch up with the first echelon, and the Fujian will become the main force of the current Chinese Navy and the template for the future Chinese aircraft carrier
Read up on how the Liaoning was really purchased. Fascinating story.
Many sour grapes seeing chinese new aircraft carrier starts sailing in the open sea
I'm happy to see them waste tons of money on something that will be of little strategic value to them. They won't dare put their status symbol where it could be threatened. Much like the Russians Su-57s.
@@Mishn0 You must have been absent from the China Coast Guard’s free trip to Hawaii 😂
@@神可汗 The US, unlike the CCP respects the freedom of the seas. We don't have a tantrum and shoot missiles into the water to kill fish if someone passes near our territorial waters.
@@Mishn0 is braindead he needs all these lies to have a better sleep at night let him be everyone
@@神可汗China is well aware that we won’t let an invasion of Taiwan slide like that. This is why they are scared to invade. Attacking the main supplier of US semiconductor (Taiwan) would be like declaring war
大家不要紧张，这只是我们的大型渔船，用于捕捉鲸鱼🐳，只不过设计成了航空母舰的样子而已。爱你们❤️❤️❤️❤️
😂 Very humorous! 🤣
确实是大型捕鱼船，众所周知平整的甲板只是为了更好的分类和加工鱼类！
我证明是真的，我就住在这个岛上。
大尺寸？体积小！
不能捕鲸的好吧，捕鱼船倒是真的
Our aircraft carrier is just a fishing boat, used for fishing, not fighting. We can't even compare with the Indian aircraft carrier, let alone the United States. Please don't stare at China every day. We were invaded from 1840 to 1965, and we just wanted to live a better life.
😅🤣😂, China is tough, as long as they are not in a fight.
Yes, the Chinese love peace, and the Chinese navy was built to help civilians catch fish.
Yes, the Chinese love peace, and the Chinese navy was built to help civilians catch fish.
Personally, I'm not a fan of the "video shorts" format.
I prefer television or theater aspect ratios.
They have the capability to feild as many carriers as we do bit They don't. They seem to be doing it in baby steps which is actually pretty smart.
I think they'll field a lot more once they have a carrier design they are fully confident in
@@_Chad_ThunderCock In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
@@outman1923 I don't question Chinas ability to create the world's powerful fleet. I just think they want to be very methodological, so they can develop a very capable nuclear carrier fleet and that's going to take a bit of time.
福建号的动力是烧秸秆，所以中国政府禁止农民烧秸秆了，福建号山东号辽宁号都是烧秸秆来的。
I prefer landscape videos but if portrait is more popular with the algorithm then you should keep using it. Keep up the good work commander!
Personally, I prefer these videos in a horizontal format. Thanks for your effort, anyway
Love the video, DON'T love the narrow vertical video format.
The Chinese don't have a tradition of videoing their new toy for the world, quite likely it's done by some amateur.
I prefer 16:9 ratio videos... this format youre trying is horendous and only works on tik tok. 😢
Cope, primitive. Get yourself a phone
@@Ordoabchao-x9klooks horrendous in phone too
Good work China, probably cost a fraction of the price compared to the US made ones.
Bahahahahaaaa yeah... good work
Well it should cost a lot less as it's not nuclear - the UK went own the same route, but it does limit how far it can go and how long it can remain on station when it gets there. I would imagine the use case for this ship is staying within the south China sea so it should be fine, but it wouldn't be able sail to the Mediterranean and run a year long operation against an adversary - unlike the US carriers which can and do do that.
Wonders of non nuclear and cheap labor force.
The question is. Will it be in operational before the Kennedy?
The Chinese people love peace, and the Chinese navy was built to help civilians catch fish better.
Don't care one way or the other about the format. Just keep bringing the info.
*congratulations to the Chinese navy*
Congratz China.
Length of the video is fine, but I don't like videos presented in a vertical format. I watch YT primarily on a PC and TV. When I do occasionally watch on a phone, I always turn it sideways to give more clarity of details on the screen.
why phone alignment?
I love the idea of the Newsflash series but PLEASE do not have them filmed vertically, come on
The new style is not to my taste but I'm just here for the content. You guys do what you need to - I'll be here.
Thankfully listening only is always an option !
I watch on a pc, so very much prefer the regular format.
I'm just here to see what the bots say when the coverage is mostly positive.
Shocker, they're still mad about everything else.
我是建造这艘破船的工程师之一，这艘船很差，甚至比不上印度的航母，冒黑烟是因为主要动力是烧煤炭。
这钩太直了吧🤣
战忽局业务水平需要提高
Hello Taiwan province
同意，中国纸老虎不堪一击，印度才是亚洲真正的超级大国
@@gadgetgasspoll2923 🤫 这是个渔夫，不要打扰
Why is this video vertical mode?
dude it's for phones
@@Ryuu1010YT I’m on my phone, jackass, it still looks like shit
I dont like the format, eventhough i watch on mobile
I hope you realize that many of us watch on tablets computers and televisions. The vertical format sucks
Watching on a tablet now and a I hate it
If your country's navy doesn't even operate a carrier group then I don't want to hear it from you in the comments.
You think your country operating a carrier makes you an expert or authority on the subject? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@vdotme Only critiques from USA are accepted. Chinese are not interested in downward comparison, only upward. ☝
@@vdotme weird flex but ok
@@yutian5884 so, a dictator and an expert. Your mother must be so proud. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@vdotme You mean Junior Marcos and his Father in corruption?
They are so powerful I like it
It's literally got a steam turbine engine. It's using an outdated catapult system and still has yet to do any real display of capability besides not falling apart instantly, which with the way their belt and road work goes is an accomplishment itself.
作为一名中国海军工程师并光荣的参与了这艘航母的建造我负责的告诉大家：它是烧煤的
不要吹嘘中国的制造能力！😅😅他是烧木炭的
能烧炭作为动力，不是另一种形式的技术领先吗，哈哈哈哈
钩太直没法钓鱼
我昨天还捡柴火呢。你今天就烧煤了？！
It's a good time to be alive seeing more military innovation and competitiveness.
I'll be more worried if China starts building arks.
Its a good time to be alive when major world powers are starting to engage in an arms race in anticipation of a huge war?
I assumed that it was nuclear. Conventional diesel seems like a massive liability if their plan is to project power around the world.
She's not diesel. Conventional oil-fired boilers for steam turbines.
They're not trying to project power around the world like the US does.
The CCP has not been able to steal a suitable reactor design as of yet. But the monkey see/monkey do country is hard at work trying to steal one.
Chinese CV's major missions are building shields between amphibious vessel fleet and potential American attack.
If the they plan to invade Taiwan they don’t need nuclear carriers West Taiwan is next to Taiwan
Dose anyone noticed there are lots of wheel tracks around the catapults? All the three catapults are full covered by those tracks, they should have already launched many times.
Beautiful ship
Short few minutes format, good, but vertical video....bad
it's only for phones.
It’s always good to try new things to stay fresh. But I watch RUclips on a large screen monitor. I’m not about to unmount it and flip it on its side.
it's only for phones
@@Ryuu1010YT Agreed and ironic; I’ve never watched Commissar Binkov’s work on my phone.
@@maestromecanico597 it's getting end up into brainrot you know gen alphas
The new format isn't bad, just needs some work. It won't be appropriate for all topics. When you show maps and info graphs I prefer the full screen layout. Never stop experimenting.
福建舰只是用来过渡的，中国大概还要制造一艘常规动力航母，然后再继续制造核动力航母😂
What in 20 or 30 years? 😂😂😂
Thx Comrade Binkov!
Great China 🇨🇳 🇨🇳👍👍💐💐
山寨貨😂😂
Counterfeit master. Master thieves..
@@張榮華-z9o 你赖皇的无人机用的都是大陆零件,连熊3都是运到青岛去维修的，别笑死人了。
Copy cats, can’t build any good technology without stealing 💀💀
@@carty200 Exactly. This latest carrier is a tofu dreg copy of the mighty Nimitz class carrier, but run with substandard old-fashioned tech by the Chinese. The US will wipe them out easily.
I liked the new format
What the fuck is that aspect ratio bruh
Question?
Technically isn't 1 of those carriers an old Ukrainian or USSR air craft carrier?
Does China have any Nuclear powered air craft carriers?
How many people does this take to be operational? 20,000?
How many aircraft can it contain?
Doesn't China only have 1 base or port in the world?
I can answer some. The Liaoning was originally the Riga, built in Ukraine for the Soviet navy. The Shandong was built domestically as a modified version of Riga's design. The Fujian is a new design for China. None of them are nuclear-powered, which could mean the EMALS system would have a slower launch rate (fewer aircraft per minute) than if it were powered by a nuclear reactor.
Good question about away Ports, if not they'd be tethered to the Mainland.
@@hanrockabrand95 Wouldn't the conventional powered carriers leave a smoke signal behind?
@@marshalllapenta7656 Depends on the design. Old Soviet designs do.
For ports, China is expanding its influence abroad and currently looking to develop ports/facilities in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Djibouti that could be adapted for use in resupplying their navy.
中国的目标是制造至少5艘常规动力航母，常规动力航母虽然搭载舰载机的数量不如核动力航母但是常规动力航母出勤率比核动力航母更高，所以中国不会急着追求核动力航母，而是会继续制造至少一艘常规动力航母然后再制造核动力航母
Power projection is also not particularly in China's strategic concerns currently, it's much more control over the chinese sea?
For protection of world trade, the goals and interests are fairly similar with the West and it's that many costs avoided, right?
@@marcbuisson2463中国海的控制早就完成了，目前中国已经在南海三大方向填充岛礁建立军事基地，只要部署3代机随时可以战时控制南海，中国不会去追求像美国一样在世界部署大量军事基地，那样会导致在海外的军事基地慢慢变得越来越腐败，中国未来可能只会追求在一些东南亚国家开发军港，在一些南亚国家如巴基斯坦马尔代夫部署一些军港，还有在一些非洲国家部署军港，但是这些军港的功能就跟军事基地差不多
三代机控制南海太落伍了，起码得是4代机才可以空优，起码得是歼20级别的。@@哈哈哈-d8b
I love listening to a sock puppet for some of the most cutting edge info you can get, at least on RUclips.
China can make and operate carriers while Russia can't! 😂
Russia can, it's just not a priority. For Russia, submarines are a much better use of money due to their much more varied defense requirements.
Well it helps to be second biggest economy in the world and not be ashamed that your success is based on you being a developing country. If China has 3 aircraft carriers and a space program I say they are a developed country and they should have to play with the big boys.
China built supercarrier, turkey built 5th gen stealth jet, meanwhile my india cant even build en0ugh T0ilets f0r us inddians
You love latrine 😂
After China, US, Russia f_ck with each other, India will have so many toilets, more than you can count
india does have much to many people ...🤣
Indians have a very strong odor. It is so sad. A friend of mine cries whenever she realizes that people start smelling her at work then she would go to the rest room sit there and cry.
印度不是世界第一吗？
004将会是003同型姐妹舰 仍然是燃油动力 会改进一些003使用经验发现的问题 005开始才会尝试运用原子动力 是否会将吨位加到十万吨也是未知数 未来十年之内基本上很难看到美国与法国之外的原子动力航母 但如果俄国愿意出售反应堆技术 那么时间表可能会提前 俄国的北风之神原子动力潜艇技术仍然高于美国 如果096潜艇能够获得相关技术 会大幅增加先进性能
如果按照山东下水到福建下水的速度，十年内核动力会下水。
Where the fuck is my Chow Mein? Don't worry about world ending ships and focus on my meal. 🥡
Thanks for this 👍
Well done Binkov on your new news flash videos format
If the Chinese want peace they need 7 super carriers for protection from outside forces.
2 & a couple of overseas bases will do the trick added to the islands built.
@@vdotmewell may venezuela & cuba can host one.
@@andrean2247 more than Venezuela, They'll probably go for the horn of Africa, closer to the action.
@@vdotme bet, if they can enter republic of congo its done.
In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
I wonder how many years until the war happens. Not like this thing is very dangerous, but still it is unlikely carriers will be involved in a Taiwan invasion and it will be land based planes. The ex-Russian carriers with the bent decks are no more than amphibious support ships nowadays
China isn't in a rush. War will not happen in this decade unless Taiwan try to declare independence.
Aircraft carriers are pretty much obsolete due to hypersonic missiles. I'm sure China has a use for them tho. Such as for large-scale rescue missions due to catastrophic natural disasters and maybe some aspects of defence.
@@fzmoifzmoi2575 Hypersonics are only good for fixed targets lol, they can't hit moving ships.
Pray for it to never happen, although it does feel like it's getting closer and closer...
Aircraft carriers are still missiles platforms, although its their planes who carries the missiles and extend their range.
So no, they are still not obsolete, because your ground missiles cant reach everywhere.
Thanks for the video
In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.
LOL. At first I thought you were joking. Sorry to break it to you, Jack Sparrow and all those other pesky Anglo- Saxon pirates are fictional. It is just a movie.
this comment maybe the first evidence that there is life after brain death
Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs? OK, are you Chinese, or a North Korean speech writer?
“Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs” is the funniest phrase ever!
@@jaybee9269 I can't get this phrase out of my head, like every 20 minutes I just chuckle... "did he say anglo-saxon pirate gangs?"
why does the j35's cockpit open like the f35 if it doesn't have the vtol fan...
有好的答案你不抄表示你很傻，错的答案你还抄也表示你很傻。但中国人显然不傻。
This format is kidna weird
Bring back old style immediately 😢😢😢😢😢
What about type 004? Didn't south China morning post reported that its construction started back in late 2021? No idea whether that article is reliable or not.
Wow, someone who's asking a real question. SCMP is a mixed bag, there is reason to believe they're relatively independent and also that they're falling more and more under the control of the CCP. But its not a tabloid, its solid in the sense they're not likely to be reporting things that are just flat-out false. Whether or not someone told them what to say (or what not to say). I'm not sure about the exact article you're referencing but I believe the latest info coming from western open-source stuff is they have 2 carriers under construction.
This really isn't the best wiki page, closer to one of the worst, but its a start, and if you're spending 5 min to read they're articles, its worth 5 min to read who they are.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Morning_Post#:~:text=The%20SCMP%20prints%20paper%20editions,is%20blocked%20in%20mainland%20China.
Do you think the keel of an aircraft carrier was transformed in one day? When you see the keel frame design, it has been under construction for more than 2 years.
To the People Republic of China:
-May Allah reward you for your intentions.
mean while islam is consider to be a mental illness in china
@@celestialatheist我怎么不知道
@@celestialatheist Hard to see one being so smart like you nowadays, I cannot imagine what expression does your mother have when she gave birth to you.
To be effective, China must develop the Carrier Task Force.
A carrier must not operate alone.
Obviously.
@@archangel7052 True, it is obvious - to those that have a slight understanding of naval operations.
Unfortunately, many do not have that knowledge.
As expect, lots of REEEE in the comment section.
How funny would it be if it's sinks on trails, or if it has to be towed home?
The Royal Navy is the exception, not the rule you know.
You must be talking about the mind-blowing embarrassment by HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, or USS Zumwalt...
Nice wishful thinking, doubt that will happen.
Why? The Russian navy has been doing that for decades.
@@勿忘在莒 Dude, I was agreeing with you and attacking the original commenter...
What the hell is up with this vertical layout???
watch the video
it's for phone.
I think people who mock Chinese military hardware miss the point.
Those who mock, cant do anything
@@leminion3097 except you know, build the worlds largest and most capable carrier fleet and equip them with the best carrier aircraft the world has to offer. China will still be relying on the less than ideal J-15 for the foreseeable future.
@@alexalbrecht5768Do you konw the J35 like F35
@@kevinadrian6173 that cheap Chinese knockoff isn’t in service yet bud. The J-15 is all China has.
@@alexalbrecht5768 I don't think it's difficult for u to open the message of J35 by yourself. In fact, it has been tested on the ship for a long time, and it may have a stronger ability than the F35. Call this potential war weapon a cheap imitation, and put away ur arrogance and pay attention to this enemy.😂
It’ll be commissioned no later than 2026.
2026-2027
China have been into MagLev technology for many years now. The EM catapult as PLA called it, is a derivative of MagLev. Instead of pulling coach, it just need to pull jets to a speed required for take off.
Unlike USA that don't have the experience... Further DC EM catapult is better to manipulate the Votage and Current to give a gentle and control acceleration tp redice pilot stress and stress to the airframes.
Assuming it works. EM Catapults aren't as reliable as steam catapults and that's very much the reason why the US hasn't made the jump so far, despite testing it.
@@daveboy2000 Are you an engineer?? Do you know how the steam zipper works? .. There is a lot of maintainance issue. EM. Catapult like MagLev no contact on the tracks.. Gliding above tracks using magnetic field. No WEAR and TEAR. How ia steam better thsn EM catapult?? Is your Stream Trains better than MagLev train?? Which run faster?
@@truthful3777 He is american, or america simp. So, anything used in America is superior.
@@daveboy2000 Dont think highly of USA... They are degrading technologically.. There are no bew product nor new innovations coming out from USA nowadys. Back to EM, why USA not successful. They DONT have the Know How??? Even today USA have not fielded a hypersonic missile while China already fielded in PLA army 8 years ago.
@@daveboy2000 Why US failed in EMALz?? USA don't have the know how.. USA is no longer leader im innovation and new technology breakthrough. All these are accomplish by China. That is a fact. Hypersonic race US also lose to China.
binkov upload on the wrong category?
2-3 years likely until operational capability.
that's gonna be a nice submarine one day
😂
You mean nimitz class right?
@@Vincent-xz2bj possibly but only when the US decomisions the Nimitz Class. the US will decomision the 003 Fujian by 2030.
Like the Moskva, sunk by a nation without a navy. So the US will have no problem taking this out
@@NathansWargamesAmerican warships are no different. If Iran can overwhelm Israeli bases that is amongst the most heavily defended skies in the world with drones and old missile, the Chinese can inflict even greater damage on the entire carrier strike group.
EMALS on a conventional propulsion ?? unless they develop or conquer ports around the world, they won´t be able to go very far without a large fleet of supply ships...
They will building very large supply ships😅
You clearly have no idea about fujian like most people. China have skipped a whole generation of carrier. They wouldnt invest 13 billion on a carrier that doesnt work.
Fujian is indeed more capable than the ford in performing the emals. It is more energy efficient.
004 and 005 have been put into production, and China will have 5 aircraft carriers in 2030
If you have passed your middle school physic exams, you should know there is no problem of a conventional carrier with EMALS. The only thing matter is energy efficiency. Actually EMALS has better efficiency than steam catapuls, like those in Kitty Hawk class carrier. In a steam catapuls carrier, you need to consume energy to heat water and than use the energy of steam power to accelerate aircraft. Most of the energy were lost during this process. EMALS use eletric power to accelerate aircraft, energy lost during the process is much fewer than stem catapuls. Steam catapuls work well in US convential carrier. So EMALS will work even better. In other words, EMALS consume less energy than steam catapuls per launch. And because the EMALS in Fujian are using DC. So in theory they have even better efficiency than AC EMALS which were installed in US carrier Ford.
Its not aimed to deploy worldwide
❤China❤
Lol it won't be operational before the Kennedy is.
@@testerjs
be objective for once, china is coming for your gay military
@@testerjsYou own Kenedy?😅
So much American cope in the comments on any vid about this carrier. Quit thinking with your little head for a second and consider what it is and what it's for. China's not the US: China is a continental power, with big land borders and a fundamental interest in the new silk road (the belt and road). Think about where China's interests are and where and how they might deploy this kind of asset. Dollars to cents it's not the kernel of a blue water navy to challenge the USN in the mid Pacific.
We’ll see the Chinese “coping” when it sinks. 🤣😂🤦
Correct China is a continental power in history is littered with the ruins of Continental Powers who over invested trying to build a blue water Navy to have things both ways. Turns out you pretty much have to pick one of the other as a country. Got little Powers who build babies generally bankrupt themselves
Building a carrier is one thing, that's just hardware and can be copied from other people. Learning how to use one is another thing altogether. The US has a 100 year head start there.
@@Mishn0 I 100% agree with you. There is no substitute for experience. I feel bad for the PLAN sailors who have been told they have a chance in hell.
@@Mishn0so you would advise chna not to build the carrier bcoz U5 with almost full 100 yrs of war experience is no threat to chna. Also the country with d most powerful destructive institution like C1A will not be used against chna? No?
Why not live in peace, world is big enough for all and let's take good care of our planet earth.
The Format cuts out part of text
Human eyes go from Left to Right, not Top to Bottom. No reason to make vertical videos a even in watching on phone, phone can be oriented Left to Right.
you're bucking the common, modern trend, like it or not that is how most people view on mobile, and he flat out said he is trying to keep up with trends
@@yikemoo Lemmings follow trends. I understand the why, but maybe folks watch videos vertically on phones because they are produced in a vertical manner. If they were produced horizontally, folks would simply turn their phones 90 degrees. Either way, he makes good content.
@@edl653 agreed he makes good stuff, and I am not a fan of the new format either, but its also not annoying enough to get me to stop watching
@@edl653 and cut the guy some slack, he is running a business and that business depends on constant growth
Fujian? What a nice name for a coral reef..........
hahaha
It is also a nice name for your b-hole when a black cork attacks it under the sheets every night.
shitty aspect ratio!!!! make it 16:9!!!!
Use more exclamation marks
@asiberiantiger188 yeah I really should have to emphasize!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nicely done. I wonder if the smol carrier borne AWACS they were developing is finished. Also don’t they need to add a catapult hook for all the J15s this is going to operate?
J15B work with catapult. KJ600 carrier borne awacs are ongoing test with J35
@@andrean2247 Oh ok. Didn’t know that the J15 B was already catapult ready.
@@tetraxis3011 yep it was catapult ready.
@@andrean2247 Makes sense. Having the combat air wing ready so that as soon as the carrier enters service the fighters can be deployed.
That’s going to make a wonderful artificial reef.
you are so insecure you had to comment that twice on each video
@@J_X999 stalker.
Uuhh the cope is fantastic
whats the deal with the narrow video? not watching.
it's only using for phones.
Blinkov is one of the best analysts ive ever come across hes very unbiased hes neither pro western or anti western like most analysts unfortunately though the comments are always filled with pro western idiots
Tell us you are a red without telling us you are a red.
As far as stuff goes, yours is always awesome
It must have been great to see people in the comments crying on Battlefield
Love this format!
Meh, it's made in China. The catapults are probably from Temu and use rubber bands.
Accurate assessment 😂😂😂😂
I can completely confirm your opinion, it has no threat, nothing more than a fishing boat.,
Keep your ignorance and bias.
😂 I see ur bone is weaker than temu toys
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，你说出这句话的底下不知道你有多羡慕😂
这个航母的电磁弹射是怎么达成的，里面难道有个超大锂电池？或者超级电容。。
It's DC
Nuclear Power
Ready to the on PH's ferry boat?😂don't play with fire....
In 10 years China will have 2 or 3 more of these things and then suddenly the naval status quo will look a whole lot different.
Re: in ten years
Nah!!! The Chinese are not out to compete with anyone.
Their objective is absolutely “no Iraq, no Libya, no Syria, no Kosovo, and, no Vietnam War for them and…
They are working towards making sure events like that don’t get any chance to happen to them…
Sometimes however they are not at liberty to guaranteed that nothing like that will ever happen to them…
.
I appreciate the unbiast content You produce.
It will end up a giant rust bucket sitting in port somewhere.
Ohh the cope
So does every single ship.
@@tainechen1634 That "prop" masquerading as an Aircraft carrier will go sooner than later.
@@andrean2247It's called mald, I think
@@StalinTheMan0fSteel So much salt....so much cope.
As fast as china build ships, they will probally build 10 carriers before the U.S. build 10 Ford carriers...
Where are you getting your info from? China is likely to produce 10 carriers before the U.S. even buys the long-lead items for the next Ford class scheduled. I thought you guys were all "yeah but carriers are useless because of anti-ship missiles"
@@yikemoo The shipbuilding speed in China is more than 200 times that of the United States, according to this year's news. If a war were to break out, theoretically, China could build over 200 aircraft carriers in the time it takes the United States to construct one. Times have changed.
@@ZZQ95 you sound like a 13 year old
@@yikemoo hes not exagerating. China has 232 times the US shipbuilding capacity and accounts for more than 50% of the whole worlds shipbuilding capability.
I don't think they need or want 10 carriers. They just need enough to defend move out to 2nd island chain and to defend their lines of communications. Each carrier is exorbitant to build and maintain even for China and it is a waste of money that can be used to build uplift more people out of poverty and to invest in productive things.
Fujian, Chinese for white elephant.
White elephant in Chinese is bai xiang. Fujian is just the name of Fujian Province and has nothing to do with White elephant.
Fujian, the characters literally mean “Lucky Construction”, and name of a province. But I know what you meant. But here is my advice: underestimate China at west’s own peril.
And White elephant is also Chinese nickname for your Mahthur 😂
China realized they don't want Cope slope carriers. Maybe they can export this to Russia
Or the UK or India?
I bet there is a US submarine lurking around 👀
That's what the black American soldier said to you under the sheets last night
@@alhkcblack9617 cry more communist ! He’ll wisper to you mama ears soon 🤡
@@alhkcblack9617 don’t confuse me with your mom 😁
@@JesusChristItsJasonFrogChina is more capitalistic than the west hence you can’t compete
@@JesusChristItsJasonFrog and you don't confuse it for your dad 😂
.
My call on what’s going on:
This boat, type 003, CV-18, is nothing…
Speculations abound, words in the street is that they have plans for *a super container ship and other marine vessels using thorium reactor* as the
power source.
This in turn leads me to believe that once this technology is matured enough (under going actual tests on smaller sized communities right now in the country) that they will refit all four carriers, the 001, 002, 003 (and an additional 003 now in progress) with this power source which is why they still build them using conventional power sources.
Not only that, but, as we speak, chatters www abound, two 004 class nuclear power CV’s have already started, simoutanously, in two distinct yards as plans are being drawn up for an addition ten boats of different tonnages all likely to br powered by thorium now by 2045 timeframe…
And, by that logic, we can assume that they will start fielding their Aegis and other naval systems with the same power source due to the safety aspect of thorium reactors over others power sources.
Only logical you know. They are waiting for thorium.
.
ok dude, sure
they wouldn't bother, too much work to replace the power system. Easier to build more carriers.
@@rogue_hk the majority of these idiotic propaganda attempts feel like they're written by a 13 year old. a thorium reactor swap?
@@yikemoo not propaganda, they just don't know enough so it sounds like propaganda.
Clickbait