Building, cars damaged after explosion in Ukraine's Kharkiv | AFP

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
  • People inspect the damage left after a residential building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv was struck by Russian forces, injuring at least 15, according to the head of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration. Russia's surprise ground offensive in the Kharkiv region has forced thousands to evacuate and pushed Kyiv to mobilise troop reinforcements.
    Interested in licensing this video ? Get in touch 👉 u.afp.com/wvnD
    N.B.: AFP’s services and content are for professional use only

Комментарии • 15

  • @debbywilliams9172
    @debbywilliams9172 23 дня назад +5

    Looks like london

  • @Gerry1916tiacfaidharla
    @Gerry1916tiacfaidharla 23 дня назад +3

    Ukraine bombed Belgorod on Sunday killing 17 civilians this was probably Russia's response.

  • @tanvirfahim8075
    @tanvirfahim8075 23 дня назад +3

    What about palestine ?hypocrite 😅😅

  • @user-qy7pl5bc1x
    @user-qy7pl5bc1x 23 дня назад +1

    И что тут такого, Донбасс с 14 года так обстреливают, ничего страшного

  • @user-rq9cx7qg4o
    @user-rq9cx7qg4o 23 дня назад +6

    Russia has the right to defend itself.

    • @jamesedwards7241
      @jamesedwards7241 23 дня назад

      From who?. NATO was not attacking Russia and the West in general was only interested in peaceful trade relations with Russia, Ukraine certainly was not attacking anyone even though it had every right to do so. Maybe you should stop listening to Putin's propaganda and start by looking at the facts here.

    • @tanvirfahim8075
      @tanvirfahim8075 23 дня назад +1

      ​@@jamesedwards7241 nato was established for defending soviet ,but now soviet union is not exist. Why Western countries are willing to grow it now ? Is it not threat for Russia?

    • @jamesedwards7241
      @jamesedwards7241 23 дня назад

      @@tanvirfahim8075 Again I suggest you look a lot harder at the facts regarding NATO.
      It was not formed to specifically attack the Soviet Union but as a defence against any threat to any of its member nations wherever that threat might come from.
      NATO has very strict rules about when and where it can operate but it is obliged to do so if one of its members is attacked which is the reason Putin has not done so to date because he knows what would happen if he did.
      It also has very strict rules about when a country can join NATO. Look at Sweden which recently did, it took them years to gain membership. As for Ukraine, it has not made any application at all to join NATO and it cannot while there is an ongoing conflict in that country so Putin's claim NATO was expanding into Ukraine was false all along.
      Take it from me that while NATO members are watching very closely what Putin is doing they have no intention of attacking Russia at all. and as was pointed out the other day in the media. If Putin does not like the idea of Ukraine using supplied weapons it has received to kill Russian troops that are trying to invade that country then he knows what to do. stop attacking Ukraine and take his remaining troops back inside Russian borders where they will be safe.

  • @ian85reilly
    @ian85reilly 23 дня назад +2

    Cookoes nulund

  • @LindsayShadbolt
    @LindsayShadbolt 23 дня назад +1

    Sorry for all your losses

    • @ninzki143
      @ninzki143 23 дня назад

      Stop with your virtue signalling. You weren't sorry when Ukraine bombed an apartment complex a few days in Belgorod killing dozens of people or the murder of innocent Palestinians in Gaza

  • @volkernimke312
    @volkernimke312 23 дня назад +1

    😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 slawa Ukraine 🇺🇦💙💛❤