★ *REVIEWING **bit.ly/cxa81ca* ★ *QOTD: What is your favorite integrated amplifier of all time, and what integrated amp should I look at in 2020?* ★ *COMMENT RULES:* - No outside URLs, RUclips links or email addresses - Keep it civil. It’s okay to disagree, just don’t be a jerk about it.
Marantz PM6006 or Onkyo 9110. Two great affordable amps. Can you do a video re the loudness button on an amp and whether tone controls are good, bad or ugly? Thanks. Great channel. 👍
Hello friends of the channel, the old English brand Leak Audio is back on the market or on the way there. Very nice devices with a great vintage look. Best greetings and wishes
Hi Andrew, I remember liking the Audiolab 8000A. Arguably a classic? Used to get really hot when it ran. Also A&R A60 (I still have one) and an NAD 3020. Love the channel man. -Peace.
I have two Otis mono block power amps,a project, pre amp and Fyne audio speakers (f303). I have a quiet hum at low volume,am new audio file any help or advice would be gratefully received.
I liked how you listed the specs without talking about them. Secondly your description was what I was looking for. Sadly this isn’t for me but I’ll keep looking!
I just received this Amp, and WOW. I Love it. I tried NR1200, the Amp has more features, but the sound was horrible. Marantz is not even near this. This Amp Blow my mind. Thank you.
Should compare it to the Marantz 8006, which would be more apples with apples. I doubt you will still choose the Cambridge. Especially if you were adding a turntable to your amp.
@@nexttvc That doesn’t answer my remark. Another miss on this Cambridge is the lack of tone control. But hey, enjoy! Just remember never to compare apples to oranges.
@@musiclassica I do have a Cambridge Audio Azur 351A and it has that extra feature you mention but I never use them. on stereo mode I don't think I need that. yes people may use. but for me its ok.
I hesitate between the NR1200 and the CXA81. I just want to plug my PC via USB and listen to music and play games (i don't realy care about 5.1 or 7.1 sound). I just want a good sound. The CXA81 is a dream for me, its just very expensive, but not out of range, should i pull the trigger and get it ??
I own it and at this price point it has no competition. I also own the CXN. In all honesty, I had given up on Cambridge, but they have come back with a solid line. My next purchase is the CD transport, not because I need it, but because I want to own all three pieces. Aesthetically the units are beautifully crafted. Lunar grey is also a really nice finish. Connected to my PMC’s, sounds very musical, highly recommend.
Cambridge CXA81 has no competition at this price point, you say. Meanwhile Audiolab 7000A is at the same price point at my place. What should I do/would you do?
CXA 81 here connected to a pair of JBL L52 Classic speakers and a JVC subwoofer. Plenty of music in my apartments small living room. Connected to the CXA 81 is a DacMagic 200M which handles the music coming from both my CXN V2 and CXC V2.
I got the CXA81 when it came out in Jan 2020 and I think it's superb. My set up is as follows Rega P8 (new version) turntable with Origin live Encounter tonearm and Hana ML cart. Rega Phono Aria preamp. KEF LS50 speakers or Sennheiser Momentum MK II headphones. The sound i get through my speakers and headphones is phenomenal for all types of music, I'm not sure why some people have commented that heavy rock will not sound good on this amp, the opposite is true, my RL Hot mix of Led Zep II and ACDC Back in Black vinyl sound incredible as does heavy rock from cds or digital files, same goes for electronic music. For cds and data discs I use a Sony UHP-11 Blu ray player as it reads every type of cd/dvd/blu ray disc plus a usb port, the sound wasn't great using rca cables so I changed to using a single digital cable bypassing the dac in the Sony player and using the dac in the amp, the upgrade in sound is unbelievable and is the best I've ever heard cds sound, I've even started buying cds again now that I have such good sound with this method. My PC is also hooked up to the CXA81 through usb and again the sound is stunning especially using foobar 2000 to play SACD files. Don't be put off by the people saying heavy rock won't sound good on this amp, they obviously have never heard it and are making false claims without evidence, the only issue I had with it was it sounding a little bright for the first couple of weeks but then a full sound emerged with a glorious bass and soundstage.
Hi, thanks for your detailed description. I like to know something from you. I like thumping bass and sparkling treble (but not fatigue) . I am thinking to pair with a Triangle bro3 bookshelf speaker. Need your thoughts. TIA
I switched from the AXR100 to the CXA81, both of which are connected to the CXN V2. The difference between the two seems like night and day. The CXA81 + CXN V2 + Monitor Audio Bronze 500 is fantastic. Everyone is shocked to hear that sound. I am really satisfied with this setup.
I had a Siberian Husky from pup to when he died of old age at 17years. The hair must be a full time job in such a sano magazine cover living space. My pup left a contrail of fuzz everywhere he went. I always get a kick out of the ending blooper reel. Thanks for putting those in.
We can relate! She sheds year round and it's practically a full time job keeping up with it. I sincerely hope she lives as long a life as your pup. She's so integral to our life and I'm not sure what we'd do without her. Thank you for watching!
Thank you for the helpful review of the CXA81 and CXN V2, they are both on my list. Unfortunately for me, I have had a demo of the CAMBRIDGE AUDIO EDGE-NQ streamer and EDGE-W power amp, I was blown away by the sound but also by the price! So I am looking for more reasonably priced options.
It's interesting that you call out the addition of a DAC because people will likely use an external or the CXN V2 if they have it, but then also lament the absence of a built in phono stage. An internal DAC and/or Phono preamp will always be inferior to an external at this price point so if you're mad about either being included but simultaneously upset about the other NOT being included, that makes no sense. Otherwise, appreciate the review as always.
Dear Andrew, you should definitely have a go at the Yamaha A-S801 ! It makes great power, has a great DAC and phono stage integrated and goes for a very competitive price. I really like the retro styling and I’m sure so would many of your viewers. I think a review of the Yamaha would fit your channel nicely. Keep up the great work !
Michael Mettler Does not sound a good as the Cambridge, I own both. My personal taste of course, but I find the Cambridge has a smoother, warmer sound. I think also no on-board phono pre amp may be a dealbreaker for some, but I prefer using an external pre amp, usually sound better.
you were 100% about this amp and i just purchsed this last week and i have it hooked up to sonus faber lumina 2 and at about half way up on dial very open sound , but 6-7 oclock they really open up and sound great , but i also have a sound artist intergrated that only takes 4-5 olcock to fully but very powerful and neutral sound open but not as warm and revealing as the cambridge which is on another lever and im getting ready to add the rel t5x sub to the mix , thanks your review was spot on andy!!!
Hi! I also have the Lumina II and was wondering about this match. Some people say the Cxa81 is a little bright on the top end. Is it? How do like this combo overall? Thanks
I just ordered this amp with an svs 3000 micro to pair with my 1978 Heresy's. I can't wait to see how it all sounds together! Thanks for all your reviews!
Gorgeous dog! Rogue Audio's sphinx - Great Amp, Phono and headphone output. It doesn't have a DAC but you already mentioned the workaround with a streamer.
Great review as always Andrew. Here’s an amp I’d like to see you review, the Pioneer A70da. This amp is like the forgotten amp in the audiophile world. No reviews of note online like the ones you do. It’s a really great amplifier and I think it fills in some of your dislikes of the cxa81. It has a full size headphone jack unlike the cxa81, it also importantly has a MM and MC phono stage. Built in ess sabre dac, usb, optical and coaxial inputs and jeez it even has proper tone controls. It’s built like a tank too. I own one and I love it. I know you’ll get a lot of comments on RUclips and might not see this one, but I think it’s an amplifier a lot of folk would like to see you review, because it just doesn’t get enough press and exposure, and it’s an amp I think a lot of folk will love.
I kept my CXA-80, because it has tone controls and the CXA-81 doesn't. The sound is so laid back, smooth and warm, I agree with your review! Again the watts specs are modest, but in the real world it will sound very loud and muscular, I guess it is due to its high current design!
I've had the CXA-80 for several years now and I still love it. I'm using it as a desktop amp for near field listening using LS50s. The first time I heard it was in a vinyl shop in a very large room powering a pair of huge electrostatic speakers. I was blown away with the sound as it drew me towards these speakers. (I believe they were Martin Logan) I've only used the CXA-80 for running bookshelf speakers and it has been proven to be a great purchase. Of course it's always interesting to keep up with the latest audio gear but I definetly like having tone controls.
For around $1000 USD I would look at maybe Rotel A11 MKII, Yamaha A-S801, NAD C368 or Roksan Attessa. These all might sound a little more exacting and with more low-end "grip" in comparison to the Cambridge.
Listened today CXA61 with CXN V2 with Monitor Audio Silver 500 7g. Got a great deal for 4k Euro with a Cardas Crosslink cables. Sound amazed me and it's better for me than Hegel h120 with Proac dt8. Naim Atom was maybe 5-10% better (more meat in sound) but not so much to pay 800 Euros more.
The CXA81 is strong, detailed, very good speaker driver control, the sound stage & depth is as described by Andrew. The sound was what I was looking for, like the very slight roll-off of the highs for Monitor Audio speakers. Analogue play-back sounds like audiophile integrated amps of the 70-80's. Pairing with the CXN v2 is wonderful. I prefer no phono preamp added cost. Better sound (run flat) than the newer Yamaha A-Sxxx models, their sound controls are nice features, but slightly too bright for my taste. Chose the CXA81 over the Denon PMA-1600NE for cost savings but the Denon sounded very good. It does compete with my reference system- Emotiva XMC, XPA system for 2-ch in some ways, especially vocals- very clear, precise, and natural. Bass is controlled and deep for an 80 watts amp. What it lacks- would like to have a simple remote control for the amp and the remote volume control is too sensitive-increasing volume level is aggressive, no DAC or volume level read out. Too many commenters never heard the CXA81, ignore them. The amp is well built, quality parts and it's overwhelming highly rated by most buyers
@@andrewrobinsonreviews TX Greetings, Andrew. Looked at the M5Si first & loved it (a little pricy for a second system) then CXA81. I watched your reviewed the CXA81 and the AXR100, I gave them both a second look, bought the CXA81 first and very pleased with its value. We needed a receiver for our Partio because, as you know, TX summers are long and we spend most of our free time outside. Ordered the AXR100 without hearing it, off the web, mostly from Kristi's comments. As you both stated- "no HDMI" but I would trade the HDMI for networking on my wish list. For the price to performance, we can use the TV as a source. Cambridge has "upped" their game for sure. Enjoy your new home.
Compared to my recapped vintage Kenwood KR-4400, my CXA61 is quite nice. The vintage amp’s highs sing but it lacks lower mid bass thump. The CXA61 has punchy mids and better soundstage overall. It has remote volume control and can be used to stream audio from my Samsung tv. I enjoy them both.
A good friend who sells CA equipment told me most people buy the CXA81 as part of a bundle with the CXN V2. Sometimes they'll upsell a CXC CD transport but a lot of buyers are now pure streaming. They don't even own CDs or vinyl. An integrated amp makes perfect sense in that context. I heard these driving a smooth pair of Tannoy XT8Fs and it blew me away. Great timing, superb detail and just the right amount of vintage AB warmth. It sounded like a much more expensive system.
I have the CX trio, I’m very happy with it. It was bought to replace an ageing 90s System. I’m very much invested in CDs but thought it was about time I tried streaming too. (Which is great for finding new music or old music that you’ve never heard before) I later added a Innuos Zen Mini and re-ripped all our CDs to FLAC on it, for backup and convenience. I run the CXC and Zen, as well as the TV sound, through the CXN for it’s slightly better DAC, but also it’s ease of use. My wife doesn’t like too much complication when listening to music and finds the CXN and Zen pairing to be ideal.
@@alanjipy55 think I summed it up in the original comment. Smooth highs, rich bass, warm in the mids. Not super detailed but punchy and the soundstage is great.
@@sdemosi I now own the cxa81. I also agree with you although the highs can be a bit to much at times, only on few recordings though. My main source is a, Pioneer UDP-LX500. It features a high-precision DAC and a direct mode on its stereo analog audio output. I'm now thinking about adding the CXN at a later date, mainly for it's buit in dac, but not sure how it would compare to the Pioneer's dac.
picked up the CXA61 recently, great sound! Feel you on the bass response, has great depth, maybe missing that little bit of a punch. But happy with the sound.
Hi Andrew, many thanks for the interesting, informative and colourful reviews - just what I'm needing during lockdown. I'm in the process of buying the cxa81 to replace my cxa60. Cheers!
You’re right that the streamer has a DAC, but their CD transport doesn’t. So for my use case, that’s more important at to me. Thanks for the video - I ended up going with this amp despite your reservations, and it works for me.
I have a CXA 60 and I like the fact that it has buttons to select the inputs. It is much quicker to select an input especially using a remote control. And also I see what is selected easily.
Thank you for the excellent review. I was wondering what are your thoughts in comparing the Cambridge Audio CXA81 to the NAD C368 or C388? I am looking for and integrated with A/B speaker capability, built-in BT, built in DAC with at least 3 digital inputs. The price of the CXA81 slots between the NAD C368 at $999 and the NAD C388 at $1,700.
Your opinion please. For music first, Also 2.1 video a very distant second. Would you go with a product like an intagrated 2k ish amp? Or would you go with a HT receiver THAT HAS DIRAC, and something like an Emotiva amp? My aluminum/alloy Canton towers could stand a touch of warmth. Thank you, great work on this chanel.
If you are music first, I would go integrated amp. There are a few options that have DIRAC like the one we just NAD here bit.ly/3aiYZBt or bit.ly/3CJHPG2. Alternatively, you could look at something like this from Marantz bit.ly/3N89HI7 which has HMDI but no room correction. You could look at the Evo bit.ly/33nrQNE - it wasn't my favorite but would have the warmth you mentioned as well as HDMI. If you are looking at Emotiva, check out this one bit.ly/3M32zfR and find a preamp you like with this amzn.to/3ntpiYE in the middle for DIRAC. Hope this helps! Thanks for supporting the channel.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews I would love to pick up that model 40. Or some of the other options you made. I appreciate your well thought out response. The options you presented are all nice. Unfortunately they are over my budget. The take away is I guess Dirac isn't enough of a game changer to go weak on the front end to get it, even with the add of a 2-ch amp. Buy the better device and skip the room correction. I do find the mini dsp devices interesting, and have been looking into them. Time to add more acoustic treatments to what I now have in my dedicated space. Thanks again.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews don't you love when you give advice and people make a left turn and ignore you? That's me, kind of. Your, along with everyone else's praise of the Audio Lab has me going that direction. I'm trying to decide if the play is the right choice, or to go with an upgradable 5 years our stand alone streamer. Either way it's Audio Lab for me.
Having had one of these for a few months now, (With the CXN and CD transport also) I have to say, yeah, good and fair review! It’s a big improvement over the ageing 90s system it replaced, and mostly down to this amp. I’d agree it favours singer/songwriters, which I listen to a lot also. It needs turning up a bit with louder music to get the best out of it, so I wait till the wife and neighbours are out! Having said that it projects the sound a lot better than my old amp, (which was 100W) It still sounds clear at low volume if I go through into the kitchen which wasn’t the case with the old amp.
Great review, thanks for checking it out. I highly recommend checking out the audiolab 8300a, it's only like $800, no DAC, but the amplifier is amazing, compared to this cxa81 with it's 2 little mosfets per channel versus the 8300A's 4 beefy ones, it's designed a lot like some really expensive amplifiers, and I think it sounds amazing.
This is my favorite integrated so far. Add the CXN and some fun 80s music, this thing is a party with excellent imaging and soundstage. I think it’s particular with speakers so results may vary but with RP600s this thing is FUN. With the combo, all I have to do is hit a number (station preset) on the remote and enjoy beautiful music. But yes it’s irritating that using the CXN I’m wasting the DAC on the CXA81.
I have a CXN (v1) connected to a separate DAC (the v2 has it also) and you can use it purely as a network streamer, connect it to the optical input to the CXA81 using the SPDIF (coax) as this goes up 192khz as toslink only goes up to 96kh
Thank you for the review of the CXA81. I own this unit and have been more than satisfied with its performance. With all do respect to your opinion I do disagree with some of your thoughts and lack of important information regarding this integrated amp. No mention of no tone or balance controls, not a problem for me but could be for others. I feel the DAC compares well or better with DACs under the $1000 price point. Your choice of speakers used to evaluate does not do the CXA81 justice. May I also respectfully comment on your introduction to your videos. I am an artist, you state art is one of your mandates. Have yet to see anything regarding art. Please keep up the hard work. Stay safe.
Hi, I like to know something from you. Is the treble of the amp roll-off? I like thumping bass and sparkling treble (but not fatigue) . I am thinking to pair with a Triangle bro3 bookshelf speaker. Need your thoughts. TIA
@@goutomdutta586 It all depends on your room and of course speakers. My feeling are that CXA81 is mostly straightforward and does wear a solid state signature. Never wished for more bass. My hearing is not really capable of zoning in on high frequency roll off. I can say on occasions I found cymbals difficult. But that is my system. Vocals are more forward than my tube amp.
I bought this amp recently and absolutely loved the sound. I auditioned a lot of amps in this price range and to me it was by far the best sounding. When I got home, within the first few hours of use I started having issues with the Cap5 protection and in the end the amp wouldn't stay on for more than 2 minutes. I ended up returning it. Pity...
@@andrewrobinsonreviews The dealer was great, never mentioned anything about turning it off/down though. I ended up bringing it back and got a great deal on a Moon Neo Ace that was an ex display model.
Our suggestion for another integrated amp to try is the Rogue Sphinx V3. I am looking forward to hearing it at our local shop when they open for a casual visit. The Sphinx lineage has had some good reviews and the music referenced in some of those reviews is music that we relate with. DACs and streamers will likely change frequently as tech changes. The Sphinx may be a good core piece to hold for many years. We would be interested in your thoughts and Kristi's thoughts.
Very familiar with the Rogue line of products going WAY back. They're a little more difficult to get one's hands on, but I'll take a closer look and see if it's not something we might look at down the road.
Hi Andrew. Interesting and entertaining. I got a lot from your review in as much as it confirmed that this probably isn’t the right amp for me. So it has dropped off my shortlist. Now I only have Rega and possibly Leema left. Many thanks.
I love that statement you made about the atom and my system ie the CXA81 and the cxn v2. I was thinking about the atom but it was expensive. I went with the Cambridge option but with expensive Xlr cable ie £250 so I’ve never used the DAC in the amp cause the V2 has 2 DACS one for each speaker no brainier then. Loved your review 👍🏻👍🏻
Justin Byrne cheers for that now I feel I need to find out thx just bought the Xlr cable need to buy the same quality for a true comparison. Feel like a true audiophile now. I just made my first mains cable too.
Good review, I,m looking for AB class integrated amp within this price range and I heard 2 different simaudio componets and I found they were too clinical in sound when compared to Cambridge cxa81.When stereo shops open up I will do some more AB testing for the sound I like.
Awesome review. I just want to own one Cambridge Audio product. Can you please do combo of - Audiolab 6000 or 8000 series with one of their network streamer combo!!!
Would be nice to see a review of one product of the barely new speaker company „Fyne Audio“ on your channel! They are so rare that its hard to hear them in a shop before buying. The very few press reviews are overwhelming, and there are no useful reviews on RUclips about them! So maybe you can throw your eyes on it! Greetings from Switzerland!
A brand new English company,beautiful speakers, the only place is a company/shop in Carlyle, the company is on lockdown at the moment,but reps are available,love mine.
nice review.... a comparison to Audiolab 6000A would be great! which one offers more clarity and detail, soundstage, which one is more 3D, more controlled in the bass? which one offers more texture on acoustic instruments: guitars, pianos, cellos, violins. is the Audiolab more neutral?
Good review again Andrew but I would agree with the designers of the cxa81 on not having a built in phono stage. Like many high end amps this amp is designed with adding an external phono stage of your own choice to it. It's strange they added a DAC to it though as personally it prefer to add my own like you suggested.
Andrew every single time I follow you I'm genuinely impressed by your eloquence and refinement of word proccesing.You are a wasted chap hijacked by his hobby.Your common sense, convincing reasoning is to its finest.You might have been a very good politician and very helpful hand to your country where its President can't put two words together.
Nice review. Your point about the DAC of the CXA81 being redundant in many audio setups made me turn my attention to the Cambridge Audio AXA35... No DAC, but it has an integrated phono stage. Might make more sense for some people.
I have to say that Rega make some great amps. They don't tend to get all the features but do sound great. Do you get Rega in the US? Oh yeah, breathing is good, best to remember to do that.
This amp is amazing, the best i ever had, better than nad, rotel, yamaha... It matches perfectly with dynaudio excite x18, real deep well defined bass, cristal clear mids and high. It has punch, detail, openness, stereo image. Enjoyable listening, even in rooms with poor acoustics. Recommended all the way.
Thanks Andrew. As I mentioned in your previous video, the Denon DRA800H (stereo integrated amp with HDMI) is very similar to the Marantz NR1200 but with more power. Plus it has built in streamer and network connectivity. It would be great to see the DRA800H compared to these.
I agree with the review. The sound has a pleasant warm character with a rolloff in the treble. The soundstage is wide, but not really deep. The voices are slightly shifted to the back.
I know that you have reviewed the Schiit Modi recently, but they do make speaker amps and preamps. Perhaps you could put together a system with those two products to hear how they sound?
Hi Andrew! Great to hear you have reviewed CXA paired with Heresys IV. I actually have got them since two weeks and I am looking for an SS amp for those. Initially I skipped CXA since the seller made a weird face when I asked him on this pairing, but your review is making it back on my list. Do you thing those two are a good match? I am looking for an amp in this price range. I will highly appreciate your view on this. I will not be able to demo too many amps.
QUESTION: you mentioned in your review you had a 4K TV connected (presumably via Optical) my question was how was the sound , good ,average or great stereo imaging? I know it’s not an AV receiver so not expecting full fledged Surround sound but other than streaming music I want to hook it up to TV for better audio for Netflix , movies and cable TV.
I have it since February. Sounds very nice but for me it has a major flaw, transformer buzzing. I can hear it from my listening position, three meters away. Went to a dealer for a check, CXA61 buzzes too. I installed DC blocker but it helps just a little bit. I thought they use high quality components, for sure transformer is not one of them.
Best amp I ever had was the Exposure 35 classic integrated amp. Finally had its day but I do have Exposure pre and power amps now. A review of the Luxman L-505 UX22 integrated amp would be of interest.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews truly mean it..I just ordered a CXA81 largely based on your review. I know that putting together a professional RUclips production takes quite a bit of effort. Thanks and Merry Christmas!
I know that this video is 3 years old, but I'm hoping for some feedback. Why does it seem so difficult to find a reasonably-priced integration amp or power amp with XLR inputs, a sub out, no DAC, and a minimum of 60W/channel? And no more than $1200.
My favorite integrated amp of all time is the Marantz PM-94. You should check out the Reisong MT-34 MKII EL34 vacuum tube integrated amplifier. I know it is a low powered tube amp but, pretty much everyone has an outboard DAC/Streamer to use and yes you need a phono pre-amp but, again easy to get. The amazing thing is that for less than $600.00 you can get a pure tube amp with point to point wiring and amazing tube sound.
I've tried quite some amps in this price range with my (quite) demanding Elac UB5 speakers, but the CXA81 blew them all out of the water: Denon, Yamaha, Marantz, Nad. The sound is a bit rich, and it is in my opinion not the best amp for electronic music, but to my the sound of this machine is sexy and engaging, and it has some real power. 80 true watts, not the marketing mumbo-jumbo kind.
It was nice to hear you say that it has that old school warmth but that front black faux display is just not doing it for me also. I just could not place what it was I was seeing, not seeing until you explained it. I am leaning towards this but hot having the phono input just may drop this from my list. Built in DAC is a + for me. I am researching Denon PMA-600NE/800NE. I just subbed and your reviews are pleasant.
Cool video Andrew! Next, you should review the Mighty Cambridge Edge Range! That's there Flagship Range. Cool Equipment my friend. Anyways Andrew, hope everything is good at home with your family! 👍 Stay safe & well brother. ✌
It's great to get some insight into the sound of this amp. Also, I completely agree with your opinions on the look of the unit. I've considered that whilst impressive it's possibly not the greatest value considering what else is around it. Being in the market for an integrated amp myself I've found that if you go up in price slightly the Hegel H90 contains streaming capabilities and has a gorgeous OLED display on the front and their renowned high damping factor. If you go in the opposite direction there's the Audiolab 6000a which also has an OLED display, a slightly better DAC chip (although I know the implementation of the DAC is most important), phonostage and filters to allow the listener to tailor their experience somewhat. Finally, to answer your question of the day, I still have fond memories of the sound from my Dad's Technics SA-202 through B&W DM11s.
Totally agree Andrew. Cambridge Audio products seem to offer a clean, pure sound. But at the expense of forward presentation and to be honest I find it all a little cold. Prefer something like a Marantz at the budget level.
So interesting how we all hear different things which makes it all the more apparent that personally testing a product is key. As far as Marantz goes, it's my least favorite receiver that we've had in house. I know Andrew is a long-time fan but I just can't get past the styling and horrible menu.
Hi Andrew, liking your channel and contents a lot. Well done and keep it up. I'm in the same boat as you, finally get the chance to sit down and listen to music again after enjoying most of my time with my kids for the past 10 years. Just want to ask you a quick question on comparison of this Cambridge and the Marantz NR1200. You've talked about the price, features and connectivity but in terms of sound, which one would you pick and why? Look forward to your comment and many thanks for the great review. Vince
Good review. It does seem at odds with all other reviews. I would be interested in where he has heard better at this price range. There weren’t any specifics there.
All dépends your use for the dac, i pair my cxa81 with the cxc cd transporter...so i m glad it has his sabre dac in. I can enjoy one of the best cd trans under 1500 euros
I'm after this amp for some time now and hopefully I'll get it soon. First to drive some old Whaferdale VR-400's as a temporary solution, then we'll see. Curiously in most other reviews I've read/watched, they preferred its internal DAC over CXN v2's. But it any case I'll either go with the newer model CXN100 (which I think has an improved DAC), or with Eversolo DMP A6. So the bonus feature of XLR inputs will hopefully be ideal.
Which just goes to prove sound is subjective, I've seen reviews saying the amp can sound a little bright, yet this review was saying the complete opposite, but have also read that this amp needs time to burn in to get the very best sound from it, so maybe the other reviews I've seen have not run the amp in, so their conclusion must be looked upon with a certain amount of inaccuracy as a result !
I wish they would design integrated amps again that actually look like integrated amps and not like heating controllers. Also no mature phono stage in this price class ?
I’ve owned the CXA81 for over a year. I paired it with a Musical Fidelity V90 LPS phono stage and drive JBL Studio 590 speakers. The soundstage & imaging are ridiculous. The tonal balance is amazing, without tone controls 👍. Plenty of power and detail as well. The internal DAC is solid as well.
I’m thinking about Zu Audio Dirty weekend II. As the DW2 are 12 ohm, will the Cambridge drive them? Any other thoughts in the sub $1,500 range? Love your reviews and long time subscriber.
★ *REVIEWING **bit.ly/cxa81ca*
★ *QOTD: What is your favorite integrated amplifier of all time, and what integrated amp should I look at in 2020?*
★ *COMMENT RULES:*
- No outside URLs, RUclips links or email addresses
- Keep it civil. It’s okay to disagree, just don’t be a jerk about it.
Marantz PM6006 or Onkyo 9110. Two great affordable amps. Can you do a video re the loudness button on an amp and whether tone controls are good, bad or ugly? Thanks. Great channel. 👍
Hello friends of the channel, the old English brand Leak Audio is back on the market or on the way there. Very nice devices with a great vintage look. Best greetings and wishes
Hi Andrew, I remember liking the Audiolab 8000A. Arguably a classic? Used to get really hot when it ran. Also A&R A60 (I still have one) and an NAD 3020. Love the channel man. -Peace.
I have a vintage Eico ST-40 with its accompanying tuner, it sounds wonderful playing on my Klipsch Heresy II.
I have two Otis mono block power amps,a project, pre amp and Fyne audio speakers (f303). I have a quiet hum at low volume,am new audio file any help or advice would be gratefully received.
I liked how you listed the specs without talking about them. Secondly your description was what I was looking for. Sadly this isn’t for me but I’ll keep looking!
I just received this Amp, and WOW. I Love it. I tried NR1200, the Amp has more features, but the sound was horrible. Marantz is not even near this. This Amp Blow my mind. Thank you.
Should compare it to the Marantz 8006, which would be more apples with apples. I doubt you will still choose the Cambridge. Especially if you were adding a turntable to your amp.
@@musiclassica I am in love with Cambridge. The sound quality is no match with Marantz.
@@nexttvc That doesn’t answer my remark. Another miss on this Cambridge is the lack of tone control. But hey, enjoy! Just remember never to compare apples to oranges.
@@musiclassica I do have a Cambridge Audio Azur 351A and it has that extra feature you mention but I never use them. on stereo mode I don't think I need that. yes people may use. but for me its ok.
I hesitate between the NR1200 and the CXA81. I just want to plug my PC via USB and listen to music and play games (i don't realy care about 5.1 or 7.1 sound). I just want a good sound. The CXA81 is a dream for me, its just very expensive, but not out of range, should i pull the trigger and get it ??
I own it and at this price point it has no competition. I also own the CXN. In all honesty, I had given up on Cambridge, but they have come back with a solid line. My next purchase is the CD transport, not because I need it, but because I want to own all three pieces. Aesthetically the units are beautifully crafted. Lunar grey is also a really nice finish.
Connected to my PMC’s, sounds very musical, highly recommend.
Sounds GREAT! Glad they're speaking your language. I like them myself.
Cambridge CXA81 has no competition at this price point, you say. Meanwhile Audiolab 7000A is at the same price point at my place. What should I do/would you do?
CXA 81 here connected to a pair of JBL L52 Classic speakers and a JVC subwoofer. Plenty of music in my apartments small living room. Connected to the CXA 81 is a DacMagic 200M which handles the music coming from both my CXN V2 and CXC V2.
I got the CXA81 when it came out in Jan 2020 and I think it's superb.
My set up is as follows
Rega P8 (new version) turntable with Origin live Encounter tonearm and Hana ML cart.
Rega Phono Aria preamp.
KEF LS50 speakers or Sennheiser Momentum MK II headphones.
The sound i get through my speakers and headphones is phenomenal for all types of music, I'm not sure why some people have commented that heavy rock will not sound good on this amp, the opposite is true, my RL Hot mix of Led Zep II and ACDC Back in Black vinyl sound incredible as does heavy rock from cds or digital files, same goes for electronic music.
For cds and data discs I use a Sony UHP-11 Blu ray player as it reads every type of cd/dvd/blu ray disc plus a usb port, the sound wasn't great using rca cables so I changed to using a single digital cable bypassing the dac in the Sony player and using the dac in the amp, the upgrade in sound is unbelievable and is the best I've ever heard cds sound, I've even started buying cds again now that I have such good sound with this method.
My PC is also hooked up to the CXA81 through usb and again the sound is stunning especially using foobar 2000 to play SACD files.
Don't be put off by the people saying heavy rock won't sound good on this amp, they obviously have never heard it and are making false claims without evidence, the only issue I had with it was it sounding a little bright for the first couple of weeks but then a full sound emerged with a glorious bass and soundstage.
Hi, thanks for your detailed description. I like to know something from you. I like thumping bass and sparkling treble (but not fatigue) . I am thinking to pair with a Triangle bro3 bookshelf speaker. Need your thoughts. TIA
I switched from the AXR100 to the CXA81, both of which are connected to the CXN V2. The difference between the two seems like night and day.
The CXA81 + CXN V2 + Monitor Audio Bronze 500 is fantastic.
Everyone is shocked to hear that sound.
I am really satisfied with this setup.
I had a Siberian Husky from pup to when he died of old age at 17years. The hair must be a full time job in such a sano magazine cover living space. My pup left a contrail of fuzz everywhere he went.
I always get a kick out of the ending blooper reel. Thanks for putting those in.
We can relate! She sheds year round and it's practically a full time job keeping up with it. I sincerely hope she lives as long a life as your pup. She's so integral to our life and I'm not sure what we'd do without her. Thank you for watching!
Is it really OK for you to be testing all this stuff as a recovering audiophile?
Thank you for the helpful review of the CXA81 and CXN V2, they are both on my list. Unfortunately for me, I have had a demo of the CAMBRIDGE AUDIO EDGE-NQ streamer and EDGE-W power amp, I was blown away by the sound but also by the price! So I am looking for more reasonably priced options.
I bought this integrated amplifier and the Dali Opticon mk2 speakers: this combo is amazing.Thanks for your tips.
It's interesting that you call out the addition of a DAC because people will likely use an external or the CXN V2 if they have it, but then also lament the absence of a built in phono stage. An internal DAC and/or Phono preamp will always be inferior to an external at this price point so if you're mad about either being included but simultaneously upset about the other NOT being included, that makes no sense. Otherwise, appreciate the review as always.
I'm in love with my new Cambridge setup, AXA 25 with SX50 speakers.... Love it
Dear Andrew, you should definitely have a go at the Yamaha A-S801 ! It makes great power, has a great DAC and phono stage integrated and goes for a very competitive price. I really like the retro styling and I’m sure so would many of your viewers. I think a review of the Yamaha would fit your channel nicely. Keep up the great work !
We’re trying to connect with them. We both love the style of their products and would love to feature them on the channel.
Hope it works out 👍🏻
Michael Mettler
Does not sound a good as the Cambridge, I own both. My personal taste of course, but I find the Cambridge has a smoother, warmer sound.
I think also no on-board phono pre amp may be a dealbreaker for some, but I prefer using an external pre amp, usually sound better.
you were 100% about this amp and i just purchsed this last week and i have it hooked up to sonus faber lumina 2 and at about half way up on dial very open sound , but 6-7 oclock they really open up and sound great , but i also have a sound artist intergrated that only takes 4-5 olcock to fully but very powerful and neutral sound open but not as warm and revealing as the cambridge which is on another lever and im getting ready to add the rel t5x sub to the mix , thanks your review was spot on andy!!!
Hi! I also have the Lumina II and was wondering about this match. Some people say the Cxa81 is a little bright on the top end. Is it? How do like this combo overall? Thanks
I just ordered this amp with an svs 3000 micro to pair with my 1978 Heresy's. I can't wait to see how it all sounds together! Thanks for all your reviews!
Gorgeous dog!
Rogue Audio's sphinx - Great Amp, Phono and headphone output. It doesn't have a DAC but you already mentioned the workaround with a streamer.
Great review as always Andrew. Here’s an amp I’d like to see you review, the Pioneer A70da. This amp is like the forgotten amp in the audiophile world. No reviews of note online like the ones you do. It’s a really great amplifier and I think it fills in some of your dislikes of the cxa81. It has a full size headphone jack unlike the cxa81, it also importantly has a MM and MC phono stage. Built in ess sabre dac, usb, optical and coaxial inputs and jeez it even has proper tone controls. It’s built like a tank too. I own one and I love it. I know you’ll get a lot of comments on RUclips and might not see this one, but I think it’s an amplifier a lot of folk would like to see you review, because it just doesn’t get enough press and exposure, and it’s an amp I think a lot of folk will love.
I kept my CXA-80, because it has tone controls and the CXA-81 doesn't.
The sound is so laid back, smooth and warm, I agree with your review!
Again the watts specs are modest, but in the real world it will sound very loud and muscular, I guess it is due to its high current design!
I've had the CXA-80 for several years now and I still love it. I'm using it as a desktop amp for near field listening using LS50s. The first time I heard it was in a vinyl shop in a very large room powering a pair of huge electrostatic speakers. I was blown away with the sound as it drew me towards these speakers. (I believe they were Martin Logan) I've only used the CXA-80 for running bookshelf speakers and it has been proven to be a great purchase. Of course it's always interesting to keep up with the latest audio gear but I definetly like having tone controls.
I’m glad you enjoyed the Cambridge. I have the CXA60 with its matching transport in silver. Great deals on the old models. I think they
I meant to say I like their looks a lot and I’m picky. Nice feel and build quality.
what are the amplifiers with a faster attack, better control down low and finesse at the same price?
For around $1000 USD I would look at maybe Rotel A11 MKII, Yamaha A-S801, NAD C368 or Roksan Attessa. These all might sound a little more exacting and with more low-end "grip" in comparison to the Cambridge.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews thank you!
I'd love to see the Rotel RA 1592 integrated amplifier reviewed. I haven't seen many if any Rotel integrated amplifiers reviewed. Thank you.
Listened today CXA61 with CXN V2 with Monitor Audio Silver 500 7g. Got a great deal for 4k Euro with a Cardas Crosslink cables. Sound amazed me and it's better for me than Hegel h120 with Proac dt8. Naim Atom was maybe 5-10% better (more meat in sound) but not so much to pay 800 Euros more.
The CXA81 is strong, detailed, very good speaker driver control, the sound stage & depth is as described by Andrew. The sound was what I was looking for, like the very slight roll-off of the highs for Monitor Audio speakers. Analogue play-back sounds like audiophile integrated amps of the 70-80's. Pairing with the CXN v2 is wonderful. I prefer no phono preamp added cost.
Better sound (run flat) than the newer Yamaha A-Sxxx models, their sound controls are nice features, but slightly too bright for my taste. Chose the CXA81 over the Denon PMA-1600NE for cost savings but the Denon sounded very good.
It does compete with my reference system- Emotiva XMC, XPA system for 2-ch in some ways, especially vocals- very clear, precise, and natural. Bass is controlled and deep for an 80 watts amp.
What it lacks- would like to have a simple remote control for the amp and the remote volume control is too sensitive-increasing volume level is aggressive, no DAC or volume level read out.
Too many commenters never heard the CXA81, ignore them. The amp is well built, quality parts and it's overwhelming highly rated by most buyers
Because at the end of the day you listen with your ears and not a computer or measurement microphone! Thank you for sharing!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews TX Greetings, Andrew. Looked at the M5Si first & loved it (a little pricy for a second system) then CXA81. I watched your reviewed the CXA81 and the AXR100, I gave them both a second look, bought the CXA81 first and very pleased with its value. We needed a receiver for our Partio because, as you know, TX summers are long and we spend most of our free time outside. Ordered the AXR100 without hearing it, off the web, mostly from Kristi's comments. As you both stated- "no HDMI" but I would trade the HDMI for networking on my wish list. For the price to performance, we can use the TV as a source. Cambridge has "upped" their game for sure.
Enjoy your new home.
Happy to know you're enjoying them! Thanks for watching, @TxZick.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews in HD v j
Compared to my recapped vintage Kenwood KR-4400, my CXA61 is quite nice. The vintage amp’s highs sing but it lacks lower mid bass thump. The CXA61 has punchy mids and better soundstage overall. It has remote volume control and can be used to stream audio from my Samsung tv. I enjoy them both.
A good friend who sells CA equipment told me most people buy the CXA81 as part of a bundle with the CXN V2. Sometimes they'll upsell a CXC CD transport but a lot of buyers are now pure streaming. They don't even own CDs or vinyl. An integrated amp makes perfect sense in that context. I heard these driving a smooth pair of Tannoy XT8Fs and it blew me away. Great timing, superb detail and just the right amount of vintage AB warmth. It sounded like a much more expensive system.
I have the XT 8F. how does the cxa81 match up with the tannoys thanks.
I have the CX trio, I’m very happy with it. It was bought to replace an ageing 90s System. I’m very much invested in CDs but thought it was about time I tried streaming too. (Which is great for finding new music or old music that you’ve never heard before) I later added a Innuos Zen Mini and re-ripped all our CDs to FLAC on it, for backup and convenience. I run the CXC and Zen, as well as the TV sound, through the CXN for it’s slightly better DAC, but also it’s ease of use. My wife doesn’t like too much complication when listening to music and finds the CXN and Zen pairing to be ideal.
@@alanjipy55 think I summed it up in the original comment. Smooth highs, rich bass, warm in the mids. Not super detailed but punchy and the soundstage is great.
@@sdemosi I now own the cxa81. I also agree with you although the highs can be a bit to much at times, only on few recordings though. My main source is a, Pioneer UDP-LX500. It features a high-precision DAC and a direct mode on its stereo analog audio output.
I'm now thinking about adding the CXN at a later date, mainly for it's buit in dac, but not sure how it would compare to the Pioneer's dac.
@@alanjipy55 I like the CXN but I can't compare it with the Pioneer as I haven't heard it unfortunately.
picked up the CXA61 recently, great sound! Feel you on the bass response, has great depth, maybe missing that little bit of a punch. But happy with the sound.
That's all that matters!
Hi Andrew, many thanks for the interesting, informative and colourful reviews - just what I'm needing during lockdown. I'm in the process of buying the cxa81 to replace my cxa60.
Cheers!
You’re right that the streamer has a DAC, but their CD transport doesn’t. So for my use case, that’s more important at to me. Thanks for the video - I ended up going with this amp despite your reservations, and it works for me.
I have a CXA 60 and I like the fact that it has buttons to select the inputs. It is much quicker to select an input especially using a remote control. And also I see what is selected easily.
Appreciate your reviews Andrew. Watched both of your vids on the CXA81 and the M3Si, and am now going ahead with the MF amp :)
Good choice!
Thank you for the excellent review. I was wondering what are your thoughts in comparing the Cambridge Audio CXA81 to the NAD C368 or C388? I am looking for and integrated with A/B speaker capability, built-in BT, built in DAC with at least 3 digital inputs. The price of the CXA81 slots between the NAD C368 at $999 and the NAD C388 at $1,700.
Your opinion please.
For music first, Also 2.1 video a very distant second. Would you go with a product like an intagrated 2k ish amp? Or would you go with a HT receiver THAT HAS DIRAC, and something like an Emotiva amp?
My aluminum/alloy Canton towers could stand a touch of warmth.
Thank you, great work on this chanel.
If you are music first, I would go integrated amp. There are a few options that have DIRAC like the one we just NAD here bit.ly/3aiYZBt or bit.ly/3CJHPG2. Alternatively, you could look at something like this from Marantz bit.ly/3N89HI7 which has HMDI but no room correction. You could look at the Evo bit.ly/33nrQNE - it wasn't my favorite but would have the warmth you mentioned as well as HDMI. If you are looking at Emotiva, check out this one bit.ly/3M32zfR and find a preamp you like with this amzn.to/3ntpiYE in the middle for DIRAC.
Hope this helps! Thanks for supporting the channel.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews I would love to pick up that model 40. Or some of the other options you made. I appreciate your well thought out response. The options you presented are all nice. Unfortunately they are over my budget. The take away is I guess Dirac isn't enough of a game changer to go weak on the front end to get it, even with the add of a 2-ch amp. Buy the better device and skip the room correction.
I do find the mini dsp devices interesting, and have been looking into them. Time to add more acoustic treatments to what I now have in my dedicated space.
Thanks again.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews don't you love when you give advice and people make a left turn and ignore you? That's me, kind of.
Your, along with everyone else's praise of the Audio Lab has me going that direction. I'm trying to decide if the play is the right choice, or to go with an upgradable 5 years our stand alone streamer. Either way it's Audio Lab for me.
Having had one of these for a few months now, (With the CXN and CD transport also) I have to say, yeah, good and fair review! It’s a big improvement over the ageing 90s system it replaced, and mostly down to this amp. I’d agree it favours singer/songwriters, which I listen to a lot also. It needs turning up a bit with louder music to get the best out of it, so I wait till the wife and neighbours are out! Having said that it projects the sound a lot better than my old amp, (which was 100W) It still sounds clear at low volume if I go through into the kitchen which wasn’t the case with the old amp.
This CXA81 amp is 80/120W at 8/4 Ohm. Your old one was 100W at ?? Omh?
@@MiccaPhone At 8 ohms I believe, but it’s long gone now.
Don't know if you knew it - but in Zero Fidelity's last video - you were mentioned in the comments section as a top notch reviewer.
I didn't, but appreciate the heads up and whomever is out there showing us love!
Great review, thanks for checking it out. I highly recommend checking out the audiolab 8300a, it's only like $800, no DAC, but the amplifier is amazing, compared to this cxa81 with it's 2 little mosfets per channel versus the 8300A's 4 beefy ones, it's designed a lot like some really expensive amplifiers, and I think it sounds amazing.
I'll have to look into it.
i find your reviews to be very refreshing
Thank you so much!
Would love to see a review of the schiit Mani phono preamp. Loved this and all of your videos!
What a fantastic review. It has cleared my mind in so many aspects.
Thank you very much, Andrew
Glad it was helpful!
I like your audio cabinet very minimalism, nice with Cambridge amp.
Danke!
Thank you!
This is my favorite integrated so far. Add the CXN and some fun 80s music, this thing is a party with excellent imaging and soundstage. I think it’s particular with speakers so results may vary but with RP600s this thing is FUN. With the combo, all I have to do is hit a number (station preset) on the remote and enjoy beautiful music. But yes it’s irritating that using the CXN I’m wasting the DAC on the CXA81.
C Adam
Klipsch RP600M are Great speakers
I have a CXN (v1) connected to a separate DAC (the v2 has it also) and you can use it purely as a network streamer, connect it to the optical input to the CXA81 using the SPDIF (coax) as this goes up 192khz as toslink only goes up to 96kh
Thank you for the review of the CXA81. I own this unit and have been more than satisfied with its performance. With all do respect to your opinion I do disagree with some of your thoughts and lack of important information regarding this integrated amp. No mention of no tone or balance controls, not a problem for me but could be for others. I feel the DAC compares well or better with DACs under the $1000 price point. Your choice of speakers used to evaluate does not do the CXA81 justice. May I also respectfully comment on your introduction to your videos. I am an artist, you state art is one of your mandates. Have yet to see anything regarding art. Please keep up the hard work. Stay safe.
Hi, I like to know something from you. Is the treble of the amp roll-off? I like thumping bass and sparkling treble (but not fatigue) . I am thinking to pair with a Triangle bro3 bookshelf speaker. Need your thoughts. TIA
@@goutomdutta586
It all depends on your room and of course speakers. My feeling are that CXA81 is mostly straightforward and does wear a solid state signature. Never wished for more bass. My hearing is not really capable of zoning in on high frequency roll off. I can say on occasions I found cymbals difficult. But that is my system. Vocals are more forward than my tube amp.
I bought this amp recently and absolutely loved the sound. I auditioned a lot of amps in this price range and to me it was by far the best sounding. When I got home, within the first few hours of use I started having issues with the Cap5 protection and in the end the amp wouldn't stay on for more than 2 minutes. I ended up returning it. Pity...
You know you can turn that off/down. Did your dealer not try and help you?
@@andrewrobinsonreviews The dealer was great, never mentioned anything about turning it off/down though. I ended up bringing it back and got a great deal on a Moon Neo Ace that was an ex display model.
Our suggestion for another integrated amp to try is the Rogue Sphinx V3. I am looking forward to hearing it at our local shop when they open for a casual visit. The Sphinx lineage has had some good reviews and the music referenced in some of those reviews is music that we relate with. DACs and streamers will likely change frequently as tech changes. The Sphinx may be a good core piece to hold for many years. We would be interested in your thoughts and Kristi's thoughts.
Very familiar with the Rogue line of products going WAY back. They're a little more difficult to get one's hands on, but I'll take a closer look and see if it's not something we might look at down the road.
Came for the integrated, stayed for the dog. There's a lovely animal. You should definitely include him or her more often.
She’s the best! Thanks for watching!
Hi Andrew. Interesting and entertaining. I got a lot from your review in as much as it confirmed that this probably isn’t the right amp for me. So it has dropped off my shortlist. Now I only have Rega and possibly Leema left. Many thanks.
I have a Cambridge Audio Azur 550a and I just love it. My Heresy iii's have never sounded so good.
theodenking I have the 640a, also a great amp.
I love that statement you made about the atom and my system ie the CXA81 and the cxn v2. I was thinking about the atom but it was expensive. I went with the Cambridge option but with expensive Xlr cable ie £250 so I’ve never used the DAC in the amp cause the V2 has 2 DACS one for each speaker no brainier then. Loved your review 👍🏻👍🏻
Martin Sweeney
Dac in Cambridge CXA81 sounds lot better with instrument separation than the one in CXN network player
Justin Byrne cheers for that now I feel I need to find out thx just bought the Xlr cable need to buy the same quality for a true comparison. Feel like a true audiophile now. I just made my first mains cable too.
Excellent review. Authentic and Detailed. Thanks!
Good review, I,m looking for AB class integrated amp within this price range and I heard 2 different simaudio componets and I found they were too clinical in sound when compared to Cambridge cxa81.When stereo shops open up I will do some more AB testing for the sound I like.
Awesome review. I just want to own one Cambridge Audio product.
Can you please do combo of - Audiolab 6000 or 8000 series with one of their network streamer combo!!!
second this! Would love to see it.
Would be nice to see a review of one product of the barely new speaker company „Fyne Audio“ on your channel! They are so rare that its hard to hear them in a shop before buying. The very few press reviews are overwhelming, and there are no useful reviews on RUclips about them! So maybe you can throw your eyes on it! Greetings from Switzerland!
We like the look of them, but they are hard(er) to come by so we'll have to see. But thanks for the tip!
A brand new English company,beautiful speakers, the only place is a company/shop in Carlyle, the company is on lockdown at the moment,but reps are available,love mine.
nice review.... a comparison to Audiolab 6000A would be great! which one offers more clarity and detail, soundstage, which one is more 3D, more controlled in the bass? which one offers more texture on acoustic instruments: guitars, pianos, cellos, violins. is the Audiolab more neutral?
would really want to know this as well :D haven't seen any comparison yet
Good review again Andrew but I would agree with the designers of the cxa81 on not having a built in phono stage. Like many high end amps this amp is designed with adding an external phono stage of your own choice to it. It's strange they added a DAC to it though as personally it prefer to add my own like you suggested.
Andrew every single time I follow you I'm genuinely impressed by your eloquence and refinement of word proccesing.You are a wasted chap hijacked by his hobby.Your common sense, convincing reasoning is to its finest.You might have been a very good politician and very helpful hand to your country where its President can't put two words together.
WOW. That's very kind of you to say.
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsDues when needed.
Nice review. Your point about the DAC of the CXA81 being redundant in many audio setups made me turn my attention to the Cambridge Audio AXA35... No DAC, but it has an integrated phono stage. Might make more sense for some people.
I have to say that Rega make some great amps. They don't tend to get all the features but do sound great. Do you get Rega in the US? Oh yeah, breathing is good, best to remember to do that.
We do have Rega here and we've reached out to them about their turntables and amps, so fingers crossed!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Hope you get to try them. I would love to hear your thoughts. I've been a fan for many, uhm, decades!
Would be interesting to compare with a more expensive Hegel H95 (also got new DAC).
This amp is amazing, the best i ever had, better than nad, rotel, yamaha...
It matches perfectly with dynaudio excite x18, real deep well defined bass, cristal clear mids and high. It has punch, detail, openness, stereo image. Enjoyable listening, even in rooms with poor acoustics. Recommended all the way.
Hello, I am also planning to get x18 i have cxa81 with me now.
I’ve had this amp for a year now and it’s by far the best amp for my electrostatic’s I’ve ever heard even from products like.. Hegel ,quad rotel etc
I agree!
@@Bd-ox4mi CA Edge is one of the best I've ever heard.
Thanks Andrew. As I mentioned in your previous video, the Denon DRA800H (stereo integrated amp with HDMI) is very similar to the Marantz NR1200 but with more power. Plus it has built in streamer and network connectivity. It would be great to see the DRA800H compared to these.
I’ll look into it!
I agree with the review.
The sound has a pleasant warm character with a rolloff in the treble. The soundstage is wide, but not really deep. The voices are slightly shifted to the back.
Thank you Andrew helping me to decide...I already owe a CA azur amp, but I going to by the cxa60 + cxn.
I know that you have reviewed the Schiit Modi recently, but they do make speaker amps and preamps. Perhaps you could put together a system with those two products to hear how they sound?
You should get some emotiva gear on the channel, the ta-100(integrated) and pt-100(preamp) are both good performers.
This is an excellent review because Andrew just cuts to the chase. That is refreshing!
Very enlightening about its display and the lack thereof.
Very much lack thereof. Thanks for watching!
Hi Andrew! Great to hear you have reviewed CXA paired with Heresys IV. I actually have got them since two weeks and I am looking for an SS amp for those. Initially I skipped CXA since the seller made a weird face when I asked him on this pairing, but your review is making it back on my list. Do you thing those two are a good match? I am looking for an amp in this price range. I will highly appreciate your view on this. I will not be able to demo too many amps.
Good review for your honesty. What amp would you recommend close or better than this?
You really should check out Lyngdorf's TDAI-1120 integrated amp!
QUESTION: you mentioned in your review you had a 4K TV connected (presumably via Optical) my question was how was the sound , good ,average or great stereo imaging? I know it’s not an AV receiver so not expecting full fledged Surround sound but other than streaming music I want to hook it up to TV for better audio for Netflix , movies and cable TV.
I have it since February. Sounds very nice but for me it has a major flaw, transformer buzzing. I can hear it from my listening position, three meters away. Went to a dealer for a check, CXA61 buzzes too. I installed DC blocker but it helps just a little bit. I thought they use high quality components, for sure transformer is not one of them.
Strange, I didn't encounter transformer buzzing. Slight tweeter hiss, but not transformer buzzing.
It is coming from unit itself, not speakers.
No, I followed you. I'm just saying that I didn't notice or hear any transformer hum in my unit.
Best amp I ever had was the Exposure 35 classic integrated amp. Finally had its day but I do have Exposure pre and power amps now.
A review of the Luxman L-505 UX22 integrated amp would be of interest.
Best resource for unbiased review of audio equipment for audiophiles on RUclips...thoughtful, well done..keep up the great work!
Thank you 🙏
@@andrewrobinsonreviews truly mean it..I just ordered a CXA81 largely based on your review. I know that putting together a professional RUclips production takes quite a bit of effort. Thanks and Merry Christmas!
I'd love to see a comparison to the Audiolab 6000A.
Working on it.
I know that this video is 3 years old, but I'm hoping for some feedback. Why does it seem so difficult to find a reasonably-priced integration amp or power amp with XLR inputs, a sub out, no DAC, and a minimum of 60W/channel? And no more than $1200.
My favorite integrated amp of all time is the Marantz PM-94. You should check out the Reisong MT-34 MKII EL34 vacuum tube integrated amplifier. I know it is a low powered tube amp but, pretty much everyone has an outboard DAC/Streamer to use and yes you need a phono pre-amp but, again easy to get. The amazing thing is that for less than $600.00 you can get a pure tube amp with point to point wiring and amazing tube sound.
Not familiar with the Reisong, but will check it out. Thanks for the tip!
I don't see Rotel reviews by anyone. How do they compare?
Great detail , lack of sound body
Based on you review, I'm pulling the trigger and buying the CXA81. Please suggest (and review) a legit audiophile power cable in the > 3000AUD range.
I've tried quite some amps in this price range with my (quite) demanding Elac UB5 speakers, but the CXA81 blew them all out of the water: Denon, Yamaha, Marantz, Nad. The sound is a bit rich, and it is in my opinion not the best amp for electronic music, but to my the sound of this machine is sexy and engaging, and it has some real power. 80 true watts, not the marketing mumbo-jumbo kind.
I like techno/house and I was considering to buy this amp.. why do you say its not so good for electronic?
@@yoggg932 Perfect for techno too. I drive harbeths with him. It has a modern sound.
Thanks for all the reviews. Does the CXA81 have enough juice to get the most out of the KEF LS50 metas?
easy
It was nice to hear you say that it has that old school warmth but that front black faux display is just not doing it for me also. I just could not place what it was I was seeing, not seeing until you explained it. I am leaning towards this but hot having the phono input just may drop this from my list. Built in DAC is a + for me. I am researching Denon PMA-600NE/800NE. I just subbed and your reviews are pleasant.
Spotted the Sylvan Esso logo on the CXN V.2! Love them :)
Nice catch! They're soooo good!
We saw them last year, opened for Wilco they were fantastic. We ordered the vinyl when we got home
Cool video Andrew! Next, you should review the Mighty Cambridge Edge Range! That's there Flagship Range. Cool Equipment my friend. Anyways Andrew, hope everything is good at home with your family! 👍 Stay safe & well brother. ✌
Believe me, it's all I want from them next!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews..🤣👍
It's great to get some insight into the sound of this amp. Also, I completely agree with your opinions on the look of the unit. I've considered that whilst impressive it's possibly not the greatest value considering what else is around it. Being in the market for an integrated amp myself I've found that if you go up in price slightly the Hegel H90 contains streaming capabilities and has a gorgeous OLED display on the front and their renowned high damping factor. If you go in the opposite direction there's the Audiolab 6000a which also has an OLED display, a slightly better DAC chip (although I know the implementation of the DAC is most important), phonostage and filters to allow the listener to tailor their experience somewhat. Finally, to answer your question of the day, I still have fond memories of the sound from my Dad's Technics SA-202 through B&W DM11s.
I'd love to see the Marantz pm7000n reviewed.
Noted.
Totally agree Andrew. Cambridge Audio products seem to offer a clean, pure sound. But at the expense of forward presentation and to be honest I find it all a little cold. Prefer something like a Marantz at the budget level.
So interesting how we all hear different things which makes it all the more apparent that personally testing a product is key. As far as Marantz goes, it's my least favorite receiver that we've had in house. I know Andrew is a long-time fan but I just can't get past the styling and horrible menu.
Kristi Wright Fascinating, agreed. Styling aside, Marantz in particular for me is warm, louder and offers more musicality.
Hi Andrew, liking your channel and contents a lot. Well done and keep it up. I'm in the same boat as you, finally get the chance to sit down and listen to music again after enjoying most of my time with my kids for the past 10 years. Just want to ask you a quick question on comparison of this Cambridge and the Marantz NR1200. You've talked about the price, features and connectivity but in terms of sound, which one would you pick and why? Look forward to your comment and many thanks for the great review. Vince
Going solely off sound quality my pick in this instance would be the CXA81.
And about the CXA61 ? Sound way better ? Worthit the change ?
Hi Andrew, how would you rate this compared to the NR1200 based on sound quality alone? Looking to power a set of ELAC DBR 62's. Thanks!
How about Rotel A12/14?
Andrew, another great review! Would you say spending a bit more a M5si would be a better buy?
Great review and criticism
Good review. It does seem at odds with all other reviews. I would be interested in where he has heard better at this price range. There weren’t any specifics there.
All dépends your use for the dac, i pair my cxa81 with the cxc cd transporter...so i m glad it has his sabre dac in. I can enjoy one of the best cd trans under 1500 euros
I have a CXC as well. Currently connected to my CXNv2. I've ordered a CXA81 which should be arriving in a few days. Can't wait to do some comparisons.
I'm after this amp for some time now and hopefully I'll get it soon. First to drive some old Whaferdale VR-400's as a temporary solution, then we'll see. Curiously in most other reviews I've read/watched, they preferred its internal DAC over CXN v2's. But it any case I'll either go with the newer model CXN100 (which I think has an improved DAC), or with Eversolo DMP A6. So the bonus feature of XLR inputs will hopefully be ideal.
Which just goes to prove sound is subjective, I've seen reviews saying the amp can sound a little bright, yet this review was saying the complete opposite, but have also read that this amp needs time to burn in to get the very best sound from it, so maybe the other reviews I've seen have not run the amp in, so their conclusion must be looked upon with a certain amount of inaccuracy as a result !
I wish they would design integrated amps again that actually look like integrated amps and not like heating controllers.
Also no mature phono stage in this price class ?
The styling of this integrated amp is very British, or English, rather. Great review! Thanks
Hello and thanks for your great reviews👍What’s your opinion about Marantz PM8006?
I’ve owned the CXA81 for over a year. I paired it with a Musical Fidelity V90 LPS phono stage and drive JBL Studio 590 speakers.
The soundstage & imaging are ridiculous. The tonal balance is amazing, without tone controls 👍.
Plenty of power and detail as well. The internal DAC is solid as well.
I’m thinking about Zu Audio Dirty weekend II. As the DW2 are 12 ohm, will the Cambridge drive them? Any other thoughts in the sub $1,500 range? Love your reviews and long time subscriber.
I have recently bought a NAD M10 and would like to see a review on the NAD M33