Baltimore Bridge Collapse | Baltimore Sues Owner & Manager Of Unseaworthy Dali Over Collapse | N18V

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 апр 2024
  • Baltimore Bridge Collapse |Baltimore Sues Owner & Manager Of Unseaworthy Dali Over Collapse | N18V
    Baltimore has sued the operators of the container ship that hit and destroyed one of the US city's main bridges last month, killing six people. The city says the Dali was "clearly unseaworthy" and accuses its owners and manager of negligence.
    #baltimore #baltimorebridgecollapse #dali #francisscottkeybridge #fbi #usnews #news18

Комментарии • 31

  • @gene4512
    @gene4512 17 дней назад +6

    If "clearly unseaworthy" why did the port authorities allow the vessel to leave the port?

    • @lawrencejneuser8801
      @lawrencejneuser8801 13 дней назад

      Captain probably never made it clear that the vessel was not seaworthy, from what happened it would appear that maintenance was not first on the list. If it was they would have spotted fuel problems first off.

  • @mattlechner8442
    @mattlechner8442 17 дней назад +3

    we've said it again, and again, and again - these jumbo and super-jumbo ships need tugboat assistance both entering and leaving the harbor, and coming and going from their wharves. Not a gray zone. When they are moving slowly, they can not steer themselves properly and in harbors they have to move very slowly. Not even a gray zone, and we've said it again, again, and again. And if the Port of Baltimore wants to talk about safety, why don't you start by getting that crew off the shipwrecked boat - it is clearly and seriously unsafe to have a crew living on board. The vessel is a hazmat area, and it is a serious fire hazard, and the salvage operations themselves make it a completely unsafe vessel to be living on board. It is patently ridiculous for that crew to be living on board, absolutely ridiculous. The only people allowed on board at this point should be rescue and salvage personnel, coming and going in shifts, i.e. not living on board.

    • @mattlechner8442
      @mattlechner8442 17 дней назад +1

      and p.s. the vessel is a serious risk of capsizing during these salvage operations, so it would be highly advisable to have some equipment in place to address that, such as those giant flotation air bladders which are used to raise sunken ships.

  • @davidphillips7321
    @davidphillips7321 16 дней назад +2

    Good Luck Collecting any Money - they will just File Bankruptcy and Disappear...

  • @feedog9326
    @feedog9326 17 дней назад +3

    If it was "unseaworthy " what happen to the Pilot ? Port authorities. The Pilot is the one in charge of ship until its out in open water.

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 17 дней назад

      The harbor pilot is not responsible for inspecting each ship they get on.

    • @WarrenDSilva
      @WarrenDSilva 15 дней назад

      Master always remains responsible, 'Courses and speed as per Master's orders, on pilot's advice" - except navigating in the Panama canal.

  • @user-js4pw5kp6g
    @user-js4pw5kp6g 12 дней назад +1

    ANY ship entering or leaving the port should have a tug boat escort. The ships operators need to held accountable. They new that there was a problem, but they didn't care. They left the dock anyway. They are the ones that need to be held accountable. They are the ones who are ultimately responsible for their ship and the equipment on board. This was totally preventable.

  • @jcrossover2418
    @jcrossover2418 4 дня назад

    This is when sponge bob was the captain and Patrick was the maintenance guy lol

  • @bobward-dt5se
    @bobward-dt5se 17 дней назад +2

    you are treading on tender ground why did the tugs not escort the ship in to open water and why were the flinsey bridge supports not have dolphins to stop this happening also did the ship load fuel from the port that was contaminated

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 17 дней назад +1

      The tug thing is old news, the bridge isn't flimsy, and fuel contamination wasn't the problem.

  • @charlesturner9164
    @charlesturner9164 4 дня назад

    How about the Official that let it leave port. They need too be held accountable.....

  • @MariaBarnette
    @MariaBarnette 5 дней назад

    Our infrastructure in this country is not update if a ship hitting a bridge disrupts our way of getting needed items to the rest of the country what has to happen to take this country down?? Where is all the money going politicians need to be held accountable for fixing this country up we need to come together to get this done 'we the people "

  • @GURPREETSINGH-ii5qh
    @GURPREETSINGH-ii5qh 17 дней назад +1

    Rhese ports are built in early 1900 not fit to accommodate these big ships

    • @1972Ray
      @1972Ray 17 дней назад

      You realize there's been massive improvements to the port since 1900, right? The Dali is not the biggest ship that comes to Baltimore.

  • @carolanderson2773
    @carolanderson2773 16 дней назад

    There is a tug bringing in a ship in. Playing by the rules now that the world is watching? What is the weight limit? It looks overloaded.

  • @lawrencejneuser8801
    @lawrencejneuser8801 13 дней назад

    The ship needs to be confiscated.

  • @WarrenDSilva
    @WarrenDSilva 15 дней назад

    Hold liable and responsible the DOC holders (DPA / Tec & ops departments) to the full extent of the law - blatant disregard to the ISM code - only function of such ship managers are to harass the ship staff and suck up to the owners.

  • @ludwigvanosselaer4179
    @ludwigvanosselaer4179 16 дней назад

    what will happen to the ship? repair or demolish?

  • @jeffdragna316
    @jeffdragna316 16 дней назад

    They thought they had electrical issues fixed not the case ship should have never left the dock dali done screwed up

  • @tomllewellyn4786
    @tomllewellyn4786 15 дней назад

    If there was a chance the electrical problems the ship experiencedin port, might return, they should have not concealed the earlier problems so that the pilot could have requested tugboat sheparding all the way out of the bay and past the bridge.

  • @johnmoruzzi7236
    @johnmoruzzi7236 15 дней назад

    The ship’s owners were not the operators.

  • @jeffdragna316
    @jeffdragna316 16 дней назад

    2 were alive 6 dead people lawsuits

  • @kyawmyint2837
    @kyawmyint2837 17 дней назад +2

    ာပူကုမ္ပဏီကေတာ့ေသာက္ရွက္ဘဲ...crew ေတြကလဲincompetence တဲ့

  • @lawrencejneuser8801
    @lawrencejneuser8801 13 дней назад

    They need to have people secretly show up, and analyze the condition of the ship.

  • @jeffdragna316
    @jeffdragna316 16 дней назад

    Baltimores fault no protection on pillars of bridge dali should have never left the dock no tugboat assistance they all screwed up billions of dollars to clean up mess and build a new bridge

    • @johnmoruzzi7236
      @johnmoruzzi7236 15 дней назад

      The bridge is the State’s responsibility, they obstructed Baltimore’s port and didn’t protect their infrastructure. Baltimore didn’t require tugs, if they now insist on tugs they are admitting responsibility.
      Ships should boycott Baltimore after it reopens if this is their attitude…..

  • @michaelsalcau6010
    @michaelsalcau6010 17 дней назад

    Twas Baltimore's fault : the water was too dirty.