That is pretty silly. You're comparing a fictional character who makes a few speeches to a philosopher who wrote dozens of books. The fact that they are both Danes is coincidence
@@chrischibnall593 I had the immense privilege to be one of his students. He also supervised my dissertation on CS Lewis, making a gift of his own first edition copy of T'ill We Have Faces which was the focus of my work. He also was in the habit of inviting his students to his home the night before our first exam! I was puzzled by this but realised it was his way of 'forcing' us to relax before the event and it worked brilliantly - a truly inspirational teacher and a fabulous human being
The☯️WAY of the Artist/Actor is living every moment in the Moment of the Passion of a direct realization of T'ruth, how to Think, Vocalize, & Actualize "IT", then throw IT off the list of characters that the Actor either thus becomes a Priest🖖who's acting in the N👁W, or an 🏆🎩actor who is N👁W priestly, like👑Elvis Aaron🎸🎶Priestly🫦songing 4🍀Real🎺🎶👄💯 instead of only pretending 4🎭A🎥Reel 🎥 😂🎦!
It would be difficult to comprehend true Christianity without understanding where Kierkegaard stands on these issues. It will Inevitably have much overlap.
Well, as one of his students I have to totally disagree, he was strongly skeptical of institutional religion but I do not recognise your description of his views which I did not come across once in all his lectures and supervisions.
@@philmathieu1017He wrote a book called 'taking leave of God' and entitled his sui generis views as 'Christian non-realist'. That's an atheist. One that fails Nietzsche's critique of the fool who relinquishes belief in God but not God's morals and fails to go beyond good and evil.
Yes. Colin Jeavons- probably most well known for playing Inspector Lestrade in the Granada Television Sherlock Holmes series (also circa 1984) played pretty much every role in this emphatic manner.
It's controlled either by oligarchs and financiers OR by the Vatican and the shadowy occultists like the Jesuits who work behind the scenes and to whom the dynasties who sit atop the pyramid of international high finance (together with the remnants of Monarchy) are beholden. It's one or the other, or perhaps both working together on a roughly equal footing. Monarchies, however, are most definitely not running the show in the modern world. The Enlightenment and the influence of international capital negated the influence of the aristocratic classes, with monarchs bending the knee to the financiers who leveraged power over them through debt and the stoking up of military tension in order to create the need for debt in order to fight those wars. Those who didn't comply with the moneymen were overthrown and/or executed by revolutionary forces funded by financial elites - Charles I, the French and Russian royal families being perfect examples of the fate that awaited those who did not acquiesce to the new financial aristocracies of Europe. Today, monarchs take ceremonial roles and they almost invariably push the globalist agendas of the bankers and financiers who are their masters and with whom their bloodlines have been intermingled over the past couple of centuries. Their only interest is to preserve this reduced status and wealth by serving the powers who gained total ascendency over them.
Existentailism sounds like bullcrap to me, I don't want inaccurate belief, with methodical individualism, together with knowing life backwards, that's untrue and I don't think it's accurate, the only truth and it's not in existentialism, is individualism and therefore not following other people's beliefs, for me that's individualist anarchism, botany, batrachology, lepidopterology, and pessimism.
Individualist anarchism sounds like bullcrap to me, I don't want botany, betrachology, together with lepidopterology, that's untrue and isn't accurate, the only truth and it's not in punctuation, is not knowing how to use commas and therefore not following other people's grammatical conventions, for me that's Existentialism
Thank you very much.
8:00
Thank u
what?
Shakespeare's Hamlet was Kierkegaard before Kierkegaard. And they're both Danes. Ol' WIlly the Bard.....ahead of the game once again.
That is pretty silly. You're comparing a fictional character who makes a few speeches to a philosopher who wrote dozens of books. The fact that they are both Danes is coincidence
@@danielnelson9333 Also, Shakespeare wrote an adaptation of an earlier play, so Hamlet isn't even his creation.
Who was this presenter? I’m a big fan!
Don Cupitt
@@chrischibnall593 I had the immense privilege to be one of his students. He also supervised my dissertation on CS Lewis, making a gift of his own first edition copy of T'ill We Have Faces which was the focus of my work. He also was in the habit of inviting his students to his home the night before our first exam! I was puzzled by this but realised it was his way of 'forcing' us to relax before the event and it worked brilliantly - a truly inspirational teacher and a fabulous human being
Was it Kierlegaard or Dick Van Patton who said. "If you label me. You negate me."
Kierkegaard
The☯️WAY of the Artist/Actor is living every moment in the Moment of the Passion of a direct realization of T'ruth, how to Think, Vocalize, & Actualize "IT", then throw IT off the list of characters that the Actor either thus becomes a Priest🖖who's acting in the N👁W, or an 🏆🎩actor who is N👁W priestly, like👑Elvis Aaron🎸🎶Priestly🫦songing 4🍀Real🎺🎶👄💯 instead of only pretending 4🎭A🎥Reel 🎥 😂🎦!
Where is the rest of the video?
How about that existential music!
Life is a memory burn.
This is missing some parts
It would be difficult to comprehend true Christianity without understanding where Kierkegaard stands on these issues. It will Inevitably have much overlap.
Interessanter Beitrag
It means cementery.
The most active Churchbuilders are either believers or their opponents. ..2 sides of the same coin..
This actors voice sounds familiar. I wonder if he was the voice actor for Elrond in the BBC Radio dramatization of LotR.
Don Cupitt was a raving Atheist.
Working for the BBC, that might have been the least of his foibles...
Well, as one of his students I have to totally disagree, he was strongly skeptical of institutional religion but I do not recognise your description of his views which I did not come across once in all his lectures and supervisions.
@@philmathieu1017He wrote a book called 'taking leave of God' and entitled his sui generis views as 'Christian non-realist'. That's an atheist. One that fails Nietzsche's critique of the fool who relinquishes belief in God but not God's morals and fails to go beyond good and evil.
His saving grace is that he is not homosexual.
The only thing to fear is fear..this guy kinda looks like Michael J. Fox from teen Wolf
I hate the stern way the actor is portraying him
Exactly what i thought! The actor seems to have studied video tapes of heidegger or lacan rather than read kierkegaards books
Yes. Colin Jeavons- probably most well known for playing Inspector Lestrade in the Granada Television Sherlock Holmes series (also circa 1984) played pretty much every role in this emphatic manner.
Correction most europe is still controlled by monarch despite very stong propaganda to the contrary.
Explain please
It's controlled either by oligarchs and financiers OR by the Vatican and the shadowy occultists like the Jesuits who work behind the scenes and to whom the dynasties who sit atop the pyramid of international high finance (together with the remnants of Monarchy) are beholden. It's one or the other, or perhaps both working together on a roughly equal footing. Monarchies, however, are most definitely not running the show in the modern world. The Enlightenment and the influence of international capital negated the influence of the aristocratic classes, with monarchs bending the knee to the financiers who leveraged power over them through debt and the stoking up of military tension in order to create the need for debt in order to fight those wars. Those who didn't comply with the moneymen were overthrown and/or executed by revolutionary forces funded by financial elites - Charles I, the French and Russian royal families being perfect examples of the fate that awaited those who did not acquiesce to the new financial aristocracies of Europe. Today, monarchs take ceremonial roles and they almost invariably push the globalist agendas of the bankers and financiers who are their masters and with whom their bloodlines have been intermingled over the past couple of centuries. Their only interest is to preserve this reduced status and wealth by serving the powers who gained total ascendency over them.
Existentailism sounds like bullcrap to me, I don't want inaccurate belief, with methodical individualism, together with knowing life backwards, that's untrue and I don't think it's accurate, the only truth and it's not in existentialism, is individualism and therefore not following other people's beliefs, for me that's individualist anarchism, botany, batrachology, lepidopterology, and pessimism.
¿
Individualist anarchism sounds like bullcrap to me, I don't want botany, betrachology, together with lepidopterology, that's untrue and isn't accurate, the only truth and it's not in punctuation, is not knowing how to use commas and therefore not following other people's grammatical conventions, for me that's Existentialism
I'm pink therefore l'm spam.