Objective for SU-57: making it to the battlefield. SU-57 will join the revolutionary T14 tank in the "never-been" category. All fluff and no actual results to show for.
"If I can kill the Felon, in an F-16, that would be pretty impressive" says the dude who shot down a Raptor in an A-10. If anyone will shoot down an Su-57 in an F-16, it will be you GS
Wasn't that Raptor kill in a guns-only dogfight? I doubt the A-10 would have any chance in a BVR engagement like this one. Same with the WW2 aircraft shooting down jets, and such.
An unburdened A-10 has a pretty good turning radius and surprisingly good engine power. Straight wings DO give you a little bit extra maneuverability potential but at the obvious cost of speed.
Oh that was a terrifying end to that video. I grew up playing tons of Jane's F/A-18, and flying on the deck and perpendicular to the incoming missile almost always worked. Those axeheads are insane.
That's because you were constantly beating his Doppler radar. Doppler radar can only track a target moving toward or away from it. All fighters now have Doppler radar. Awacs? I don't know what it uses. Might be a combination of Doppler and distance radar.
I miss the post flight analysis ,like you had a long time ago. It was very comprehensive and easy to understand. I learned a lot from it. I wish you'd bring it back.
This was actually a really good showcase of why stealth fighters don't need to be dogfighters, the Felon stayed in a standoff position and rained down missiles from afar.
While I've bought several aircraft from DCS, I'm quite sure the next one will be the F-16. I still remember when the F-16 came into full public view and use....... there was a Clint Eastwood movie "Firefox" in which a helmet-mounted display was introduced on some supersonic helicopter and of course Clint was at the helm. One of my favorite movies ever in those days. Then, from outta the blue, comes the F-16, replete with the targeting tools seen in "Firefox". A favorite description of the F-16 was with regard to the deliberate "instability" built in....... it was the meat n' potatoes of maneuverability. Coupled with the recline of the seat which reduced forces on the pilot, the F-16 was incredibly nimble if not the most until the F-22.
For air-to-air combat, the Su-57 carries four beyond-visual-range missiles in its two main weapons bays and two short-range. missiles in the side bays. I counted 7 missiles fired by the Felon. Neat trick!
R-37Ms can also be carried under the wings/fuselage, though they negate some stealth until they are fired. R-37s do not fit internally, only R-77s and R-73s do. The first two missiles fired were mounted under the fuselage, and were R-37Ms.
@@vasilijevukadinovic6843 That's probably why I've seen comparisons where the Su-57 is larger than the Su-27. (the length of the Su-27 is 22 meters-72 feet
Great display of Worst case scenario. Too many people play with the assumption that the SU57 is a joke. The real challenge is overcoming its full theoretical potential. You did great.
@@semilog643I counted on google maps in 2022 that they had at least 23 su57s on the western side of russia. Not sure how many on the eastern side in Vladivostok tho. So in these 2 years I suppose they ramped up production
Yes, production of Su 57s has been increased over the last couple of years. The Product 30 engine should be going into Su 57 airframes built from 2025 onwards. @@R4FSAN
This whole scenario is extremely unlikely to occur, as very few nations are going to send fighters in alone. A nation flying f16’s especially are not going to send a lone 16 when the possible enemy includes anything remotely similar to a stealth aircraft. But yes, stealth aircraft vs non stealth aircraft, this is exactly how those engagements are envisioned. There’s not going to be a dog fight because the stealth guy will be so hard to lock.
We all have seen how good you are in this and this time you proved it again, yet sometimes the difference is too big that putting all your effort won't be enough. Still well played 👍
AGREED. 10 min with multiple shots and nada. Felon in real combat is all talk like most of Russian boasting. Remember talk of FOXBAT?.. turns out " it wasn't so much"
@@1badjesus Well, it certainly was no "Clint eastwood expectation" But Hey, if Tom cruise can beat a CGI-model. Then all is just "MAGIC come real". right?
I spent 6 years loading munitions on f16s and I watch all your stuff, but always feel nostalgic seeing you use the 16. How did you learn all of this?! Lol
If the F-16 loses with GS in the cockpit then it really doesn't stand a chance. Nice work. Su-57 might have won earlier if it shot the hypersonic missiles much closer.
Stealth doesn't just mean a shorter detection range, it also makes it much easier for the incoming missile to lose track. They probably chaffed off the missile; they certainly wouldn't need to rely on bleeding off its energy (which probably wouldn't work at 10 miles, as that's at the MAR)...
It's the best part when you went inverted haha. You said. Maybe it's gonna work. Oh it's not gonna work! Had me laughing. I love the videos man. Thanks for posting. 🐯
Just wondering, would a ECM pod on the Viper make any difference? Force the Felon to get a longer time to hard lock? I heard ECM is pretty basic in DCS.
I think the problem for GS was detection range itself. At these distances, i wonder if the loadout 2 AIM120D, and the rest full on 9x's would have fared better. Stay close to mountains and under 20 miles just go IR.
This is the F-16 against the most generous interpretation of the Felon’s capabilities, which in all honesty is how we should portray it. So that when we do come against it, we are ready for anything. Including an air to air monster. In reality is believe the Felon has a higher RCS and would be more defensive against an F-16 with AWACS, but it is very maneuverable and has lots of countermeasures; which makes it hard to hit in any case.
Day 460 519th time asking for a reenactment of Sam City in the A6 Intruder from Flight of the Intruder, movie version. Talk to HeatBlur about their A6E.
It’s good, but it’s not good enough to see the SU-57’ stealth. Overrated might not be the correct term, as none of us have any true idea about the statistics of the SU-57 besides base things like payload.
@@mikeyplayzwrld I have a hard time really believing the Su-57 is "stealth" and that does not mean invisible. It can be seen even the F22/35 can be seen. I have a hard time believing the 57 is as stealthy as claimed and I bet if a modern US radar was facing it is rather reasonable to think it is not going to hide as well as it is hyped or even as well as DCS gives it credit. This scenario might be cool with a F15 SE and it's radar.
Haha. 12 were made in 2023, making Russia have a full su 57 squadron of 24 for the first time. 20 are planned for 2024, that will make the su 57 the fastest russian serial produced jet. And the newer ones will be su 57Ms with the upgraded al51 engines and the new Russian refractory glass stealth painting. So go on coping.
@@jollyroger8671 I hope they fare better than your other invulnerable harware. Good news is that you have plenty of stuff to cannibalize for spare parts. peace.
Try it again with two, 1 AWAC and 1 E3A to see if this gives you a better fighting chance. Anyway, this was an awesome fight. I believe you were so close to victory. Another round is warranted.
@@EnigmaHood And the fact the the SU-57 is not steatlh. Coupled with the engine issues they have all the Viper would have to do is stay out of range till one of the engies dies then lob a AMRAAM at it.
@@mikeyplayzwrld It's stealth has been evaluated, which lead to it no longer being classed as a stealth aircraft. It's radar cross section is no smaller than an F/A-18, which makes it low-observable, not stealth.
@@libertarianbydefault Summary: stealth is built from the ground up to have the smallest radar cross section possible; low-observable is utilizing some stealth features/concepts to create a smaller radar cross section than what would be expected but not by a significant enough margin to fully counter modern targetting systems.
a question. when a missile pancakes due to enemy's skill, is there anything left to bring back and reconstruct to reverse engineer so we can learn from the event??
This is a good preview of how effective f-16's would be in Ukraine, but substitute a pilot with only 1 year of basic training, passable English and no combat experience, against Russias top fighter pilots in their 5th gen aircraft supported by 10x more ground defense systems...
Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/
DCS F-16 Viper: www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/viper/?
NGAD vs F-15 ACTIVE, dogfight, guns or missiles (or both) plzkthx
SU-57 vs F-15 ACTIVE, dogfight, guns or missiles (or both) plzkthx
SU-47 vs F-15 ACTIVE, dogfight, guns or missiles (or both) plzkthx
SU-47 vs SU-57, dogfight, guns or missiles (or both) plzkthx
SU-47 vs NGAD, dogfight, guns or missiles (or both) plzkthx
I wish we got to see how close your final AMRAAM got to him
Can you do a F15-C with new AAMRAM missile vs J20 and Su-57 and fight them in ocean. that’s gonna be interesting fight
Endeavor to Persevere...
What about Albatros D.III vs. Imperial Star Destroyer?
"Objective: Survive"
Objective for SU-57: making it to the battlefield.
SU-57 will join the revolutionary T14 tank in the "never-been" category. All fluff and no actual results to show for.
@@Vladput Well... Actually the russians have already used the SU57 on the front... Quite extensively in fact
Senta a Puá!
@@Vladput oh, you actually meant the F-22.
@@Vladputoh no american worshippers run! 😂😂
Honestly, these videos make for better entertainment that most stuff on TV or in the theaters.
it's true, that fight was better than the fight in Top Gun 2
True words
This is a crazy statement and objectively not true lol.
agreed, just need some more backround to the characters and a bit of storyline and i could relly get into these a lot more.
@@sullyfubar What's crazy is telling someone what they should or should not consider entertaining. Entertainment, by its very nature, is subjective.
You survived like 7 missiles thrown at you. Fairly good defensive moves until the law of odds got you...
law of luck got him as well !
If this were over enemy airspace, you would never fly low to defend, that would make you an easy target for SAMs and AAA.
Felon a missile truck?? Naa....more like missile tanker.
@@chriskibbe2901it can only carry 6
@@chris-o2v9c lost count...how many did it launch?
E-3 sentry vs A-50 dog fight next pls
lol. That’s hilarious what the heck they gonna do? A b24 liberator vs a fockwolf Condor would be much more interesting ( this actually happened)
so a staring contest?
Ramming speed
Jamming spree
@@AimlessJourneyno no, let him cook.
Felt like this battle deserves a second round man!
It would’ve ended the same way. The F16 cannot complete with stealth, much less with Hypersonic Missiles.
@@mikeyplayzwrld2 or 3 could. Russia doesn’t have the su 57 fleet to actually fight peer - peer.
@@mrlt1151 And Russian doctrine involves heavy use of air defenses, so those F-16s would be under constant threat of S-300/S-400.
Stealth?? What stealth? The wooden rivits are stealth? Since when? @@mikeyplayzwrld
@@mikeyplayzwrld iT’s NoT tHe PLanE, iT’s Da PaiLoT ;)
"If I can kill the Felon, in an F-16, that would be pretty impressive" says the dude who shot down a Raptor in an A-10. If anyone will shoot down an Su-57 in an F-16, it will be you GS
I believe he got a kill or two on a F22 with a P51.
Wasn't that Raptor kill in a guns-only dogfight? I doubt the A-10 would have any chance in a BVR engagement like this one. Same with the WW2 aircraft shooting down jets, and such.
@@ironcito1101 It was a merge.
An unburdened A-10 has a pretty good turning radius and surprisingly good engine power. Straight wings DO give you a little bit extra maneuverability potential but at the obvious cost of speed.
He once killed a F-22 in a MB-339 trainer
Oh that was a terrifying end to that video. I grew up playing tons of Jane's F/A-18, and flying on the deck and perpendicular to the incoming missile almost always worked. Those axeheads are insane.
That's because you were constantly beating his Doppler radar. Doppler radar can only track a target moving toward or away from it. All fighters now have Doppler radar. Awacs? I don't know what it uses. Might be a combination of Doppler and distance radar.
“Dear Mrs. Sidewinder, the United States Air Force regrets to inform you….”
He fought an SU-57 bravely but in the end that wasn't enough........
Your husband died because he brought a 4th gen fighter to a 5th gen fight.
@@Stinger522 4.5 gen it's not really stealth just lowered visibility.
@@shadowcarthage Who told you that lmao? Merican media?
@@shadowcarthage f35 has a fairly big radar cross section. No x band type radar would miss it.
I miss the post flight analysis ,like you had a long time ago. It was very comprehensive and easy to understand. I learned a lot from it. I wish you'd bring it back.
A 1 vs 1 fight between SU57 and YF-23 would be sweet ❤
nobody sees anything...
**Su-57 explodes**
The SU-57s stealth is garbage and the 23 is the best in the world, so the 57 wouldn't stand a chance.
YF-23. 6TH GENERATION THE SU- 57 WOULDN'T KNOW WHAT HIT HIM☆☆☆☆☆☆
YF - 23. OUTCLASSED F-22 A 5 ++ GENERATION ☆☆☆☆☆
What if the NGAD was just a spruced up YF23?
Day 12,472,999 of asking for the Wright Flyer vs the F-22.
Wright flyer solos low difficulty
Sky warden vs felon
@@AviationLover190 no diff u mean
You realize that senior citizen abuse Ijs
😂😂😂😂
Trading an F-16 for an SU-57 may be a good trade, but I wouldn't expect the F-16 pilot to feel that way.
Unless he has been married to the same woman for years and does not fear death?
@@g.k.1669 big Al Bundy?
@@catsooey He is my hero.
@@g.k.1669 I could see Al running from a missile and seeing Peg’s face on the front. Or the giant foot of a “full figured” woman. 😂
@@g.k.1669”I don’t fear death, but I do fear my wife”
The 16 amazes me that they can turn that sleek sports car into a truck
What?
@cheesinghard that thing looks like a Porsche but it loads up with more than an F-4 and turns into a long hauler
It was a great fight. It really shows how much pilot skill and experience matters even in the face of technological superiority. Well done!
I love the last few words like “didn’t work didn’t work”!
How many missiles was that SU57 carrying!?!
I think it was said it can carry eight internally.
It can can carry 2 archers and 4 R 77s
ALL OF THEM
As GS responded when asked about amount of rockets on Mi-24: a few
@@daemonhunter100it can carry 10 in externally I believe
this was exactly what i needed today, my daily DCS
MY GUY! lol I was hoping you pulled off the epic Ivan Drago victory. It was still a valiant effort.
Red vs Red scenarios pretty rare, so GS please give some considerations to:
Su-30SM vs Su-47 mission and dogfight.
Or
Su-57 vs Su-47 dogfight.
You're a legend dude.
Yes please.
Impressive defensive maneuvering and staying alive that long! Those duel boost missiles are scary!!
GS I was so nervous that my hands were sweaty, this is not for people with heart issues but you did an awesome job out there on the 16.
This was actually a really good showcase of why stealth fighters don't need to be dogfighters, the Felon stayed in a standoff position and rained down missiles from afar.
While I've bought several aircraft from DCS, I'm quite sure the next one will be the F-16. I still remember when the F-16 came into full public view and use....... there was a Clint Eastwood movie "Firefox" in which a helmet-mounted display was introduced on some supersonic helicopter and of course Clint was at the helm. One of my favorite movies ever in those days. Then, from outta the blue, comes the F-16, replete with the targeting tools seen in "Firefox". A favorite description of the F-16 was with regard to the deliberate "instability" built in....... it was the meat n' potatoes of maneuverability. Coupled with the recline of the seat which reduced forces on the pilot, the F-16 was incredibly nimble if not the most until the F-22.
Perfect time!!! Was just looking for a video to watch
Dodging that penultimate missile by slipping behind the mountain was very slick.
-How many missiles can carry Su-57 ?
-Yes!
I have no clue about any of the things you talk. But you super calm voice and subtle humor make it quite enjoyable to watch your vids.
Who else was expecting GS to blow up after he said "i.m gonna recomit cuz the rwr sounds clear ish" ? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
For air-to-air combat, the Su-57 carries four beyond-visual-range missiles in its two main weapons bays and two short-range. missiles in the side bays. I counted 7 missiles fired by the Felon. Neat trick!
R-37Ms can also be carried under the wings/fuselage, though they negate some stealth until they are fired. R-37s do not fit internally, only R-77s and R-73s do. The first two missiles fired were mounted under the fuselage, and were R-37Ms.
actually 6 r-77s can fit in the internal bay, two short range fitted internally is correct though. the su 57 here also had 2 r-37ms
@@jason59k55 And still had clean wings.
@seniorspaz8754 actually the r37m was specially designed for the su57 to fit internally. That's why they modernized it
@@vasilijevukadinovic6843 That's probably why I've seen comparisons where the Su-57 is larger than the Su-27. (the length of the Su-27 is 22 meters-72 feet
OOF, that was like watching Homer Simpson fight Drederick Tatum ... except Drederick didn't run out of gas and missiles.
Great stuff. So impressive how you manage to keep such good SA.
would love to see this with an F15 vs the 57. Think the Eagle's better radar would even the odds more?
“I am being locked up here though”
Felon-“Goodbye have a wonderful time”
Great display of Worst case scenario. Too many people play with the assumption that the SU57 is a joke. The real challenge is overcoming its full theoretical potential. You did great.
Agreed
The joke is that to a first approximation there aren't any of them.
@@semilog643I counted on google maps in 2022 that they had at least 23 su57s on the western side of russia. Not sure how many on the eastern side in Vladivostok tho. So in these 2 years I suppose they ramped up production
Yes, production of Su 57s has been increased over the last couple of years. The Product 30 engine should be going into Su 57 airframes built from 2025 onwards. @@R4FSAN
Sometimes the best videos are ones you don’t win. Great stuff.
That was a hell of a effort…👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
F-35 vs SU 57 same scenario. You in the F-35. Instant watch and like (already subscribed)
Did some excellent maneuvering. Flying your astroid off.
That Felon was a missile truck! I find that hard to believe.
This whole scenario is extremely unlikely to occur, as very few nations are going to send fighters in alone. A nation flying f16’s especially are not going to send a lone 16 when the possible enemy includes anything remotely similar to a stealth aircraft.
But yes, stealth aircraft vs non stealth aircraft, this is exactly how those engagements are envisioned. There’s not going to be a dog fight because the stealth guy will be so hard to lock.
We all have seen how good you are in this and this time you proved it again, yet sometimes the difference is too big that putting all your effort won't be enough. Still well played 👍
Is the Felon fictitious or does it exist? The 57 didnt beat you, the R-77 did.
AGREED. 10 min with multiple shots and nada. Felon in real combat is all talk like most of Russian boasting. Remember talk of FOXBAT?.. turns out " it wasn't so much"
@@1badjesus Foxbat.....lame interceptor. MACH 3? Bullshit! Roached turbines and melted leading edges. Was a great boat anchor.
@@1badjesusliterally all the weapons from both side performed as expected in a hot war between near peer adversaries
Cope
@@1badjesus Well, it certainly was no "Clint eastwood expectation" But Hey, if Tom cruise can beat a CGI-model. Then all is just "MAGIC come real". right?
Great performance, thanks guys!
nice work dude! If situational awareness was ruined for this long, I would literally freak out and run away the entire time😂
that would be a fun one to do again, only with a little more terrain
Google says an su-57 can hold only 6 missles, so you win by technicality.😂😂😂
6 internal, 2 external and the external ones are hypersonic.
bro trusts google💀
The "day x" joke is really clever & original, keep doing that.
I spent 6 years loading munitions on f16s and I watch all your stuff, but always feel nostalgic seeing you use the 16. How did you learn all of this?! Lol
F/A-18E/F vs F-35C (Fox-2 fight) would be epic to see! Navy vs Navy : Old vs New
Day 49
Well, damn... just a few more short hills from an f16 victory. Great flying evasion tactics, GS. Defense defensively. Whew....
F MAN, THATS INTENSE! Great Flying!
Su-57 vs Apache? You'll hide behind that hill while the Felon coming inside the MAR of the machine gun :D
I thought helos had a lot of advantages against jets. Hard to fly slow enough and avoid terrain clutter
loved the seriousness of this i didnt expect the end and was shocked at the kill, great realism and suspense.
At the end when you got fired on you should've went cold and made a full 180 Degreee Turn towards the taller hills
I think he was in the mar.
He was 100% dead there either way. Might as well try and go out a hero!
He should’ve Ejected before Impact
@@elite4124He also had absolutely no change in altitude when he tried roll and pull over that hill to "drive the missile into the ground".
Your expertise in all of these platforms is very impressive. I would hazard to guess that you were a Tomcat pilot? Thanks for another great video.
If the F-16 loses with GS in the cockpit then it really doesn't stand a chance. Nice work. Su-57 might have won earlier if it shot the hypersonic missiles much closer.
Something I've noticed is allot of the time when you get hit, you're turning into the area the missile is coming from.
You should have meteor with the f-16 block 70/72 viper
I think, the Problem was not range, but DETECTION RANGE.
I don't think they can carry the Meteor.
Which country uses Meteors on F-16 ?
Eurofighter with Meteor is already tested against the Su-57 and it's already deadly for the Su-57.
nice strategy. good to hear what we have to do to live up there.
These outmatched editions are pretty nice.
That was awesome man. I love these BVRs
These videos are great because this is how everyone else feels trying to fight him.
That last ground level maneuver is cold though
You shot F3 from 10 miles how in the world did they dodge that?… I want a revenge video… unleash the Raptor!!
It’s been done 4 times. I believe it’s 50/50 in terms of BVR and dogfighting
@@mikeyplayzwrld Lucky SU then. 50/50 you say and it dodged not only a 10 miler but a 7 too.
Stealth doesn't just mean a shorter detection range, it also makes it much easier for the incoming missile to lose track. They probably chaffed off the missile; they certainly wouldn't need to rely on bleeding off its energy (which probably wouldn't work at 10 miles, as that's at the MAR)...
It's the best part when you went inverted haha. You said. Maybe it's gonna work. Oh it's not gonna work! Had me laughing. I love the videos man. Thanks for posting. 🐯
Very impressive, I think we’ll need to see new F22 vs SU57 fight
I love these Outmatched videos! Brilliant cat-and-mouse fun.
That expenditure of munitions surely put a dent in the Russian defense budget.
Perhaps you could repeat this scenario over the Kola Peninsula where the extreme terrain might give the F-16 at least a fighting chance.
The fact that it took nearly 16 minutes to kill the F16 and they never fly alone 🤣😂🤣
They also never fly low like that to defend unless it's over friendly airspace. SAMs and AAA would turn it into scrap.
Chill bro this is a Simulator there is a difference between real fight and a simulator fight
It's a videogame
Just wondering, would a ECM pod on the Viper make any difference? Force the Felon to get a longer time to hard lock? I heard ECM is pretty basic in DCS.
I think the problem for GS was detection range itself. At these distances, i wonder if the loadout 2 AIM120D, and the rest full on 9x's would have fared better. Stay close to mountains and under 20 miles just go IR.
How can the F-16 be outmatched? It can still fly!
?
by the chad mig 15 made of stalinium
The explosion death animation is pretty neat.
Close, you almost had it
*F35B vs AV8B*
This is the F-16 against the most generous interpretation of the Felon’s capabilities, which in all honesty is how we should portray it. So that when we do come against it, we are ready for anything. Including an air to air monster.
In reality is believe the Felon has a higher RCS and would be more defensive against an F-16 with AWACS, but it is very maneuverable and has lots of countermeasures; which makes it hard to hit in any case.
One on one maybe but there are 500 F-16s for every Su 57!
There’s one 57 less lately
And assuming it’s even as good as the Russians say
AGMs are no joke.
@@theDarkside798 Yep, now 600-1
@@thomasfarley5070 You better do your math. You might need it, once old enough for a job.
they should add that whistling screaming sound that su-57 has...its awesome and terrifying
Day 460 519th time asking for a reenactment of Sam City in the A6 Intruder from Flight of the Intruder, movie version. Talk to HeatBlur about their A6E.
I Love it when you use BF4 Theam.... it fits everywhere in your videos. such good masterpiece.
I think DCS has the only working examples of the Russian Hypersonic missile...
Военные предприятия Киева, Днепропетровска вам шлют привет ) from Russia with love
R37M has the longest verified air to air kill ever recorded (140 miles) against an UKRO SU27. Choke on your cope dude
@@sarafisioannis2097 it was a MiG-29 i think
Amraam radar probably had a hard time seeing the su57; f16 couldnt provide much guidance, still a great fight against tough odds.
This could become a very real scenario.
Not really, too few su-57s youd probably either never or very rarely encounter one, assuming they were actually combat ready
All 8 of them
Lmao Russia is too fucking scared to fly a su57 within 200km of the border lol
Great work, two lessons, that's why they are 5th gen and secondly, DCS will survive the razmatas fiasco. DCS has a great future.
I think DCS has the Su-57 way overrated. The F16 has a good radar and would have seen the Su-57.
It’s good, but it’s not good enough to see the SU-57’ stealth. Overrated might not be the correct term, as none of us have any true idea about the statistics of the SU-57 besides base things like payload.
@@mikeyplayzwrld I have a hard time really believing the Su-57 is "stealth" and that does not mean invisible. It can be seen even the F22/35 can be seen. I have a hard time believing the 57 is as stealthy as claimed and I bet if a modern US radar was facing it is rather reasonable to think it is not going to hide as well as it is hyped or even as well as DCS gives it credit. This scenario might be cool with a F15 SE and it's radar.
@@Edge51all of this based on assumptions and "hard time believing'?
How many dang missiles does the Su-57 carry?
Good thing there are only 4 SU-57's. Make that 3.
Haha. 12 were made in 2023, making Russia have a full su 57 squadron of 24 for the first time. 20 are planned for 2024, that will make the su 57 the fastest russian serial produced jet. And the newer ones will be su 57Ms with the upgraded al51 engines and the new Russian refractory glass stealth painting. So go on coping.
@@jollyroger8671 lol 24. Now thats cope
@@jollyroger8671 I hope they fare better than your other invulnerable harware. Good news is that you have plenty of stuff to cannibalize for spare parts. peace.
@@jollyroger8671 thats cope. there are only a total of 12 in existence, of which only 8 are fully combat capable.
They lost atleast two last week
Try it again with two, 1 AWAC and 1 E3A to see if this gives you a better fighting chance. Anyway, this was an awesome fight. I believe you were so close to victory. Another round is warranted.
Reality would obviously be much diffrent. Intersting to see what would happen if the SU-57 was built as hyped and not to reality.
Realistically there would be SAMs and AAA firing at an enemy flying low to defend.
@@EnigmaHood And the fact the the SU-57 is not steatlh. Coupled with the engine issues they have all the Viper would have to do is stay out of range till one of the engies dies then lob a AMRAAM at it.
@@ziggystardink9389You’re a troll. Don’t talk stats if you’re not being serious. The Felon is 5th gen no matter your biases.
@@mikeyplayzwrldno it's not lmao. It's 4.5
@@ziggystardink9389 The SU-57 is a stealth aircraft.
Awwww shucks. That was pretty intense. I watched this one on my 32", 4K monitor. I was rootin for ya!
Day 122 of asking for kf21 vs f22 dogfight
@@MiG-31893KF-21 Boramae Vs J-11 Winged Dragon Intercept
day 1 asking you to ask gs fly C-130 Hercules
He did this match about 2 weeks ago, way to miss it
@@robertwallace4515 he didn't
The thing I'm most suprised about is I didn't know the Felon could carry that many missiles.
Not sure I believe SU-57 that stealthy nor its missle that good…
Well, the stealth is unknown, but the missiles are pretty accurate. Deadly, fast accelerating, and maneuverable.
@@mikeyplayzwrld It's stealth has been evaluated, which lead to it no longer being classed as a stealth aircraft. It's radar cross section is no smaller than an F/A-18, which makes it low-observable, not stealth.
@@NatoStorm And the difference between stealthy and low-observable is?
@@libertarianbydefault Summary: stealth is built from the ground up to have the smallest radar cross section possible; low-observable is utilizing some stealth features/concepts to create a smaller radar cross section than what would be expected but not by a significant enough margin to fully counter modern targetting systems.
@@NatoStorm it's average rcs is the frontal rcs of a superhornet. learn the difference
a question. when a missile pancakes due to enemy's skill, is there anything left to bring back and reconstruct to reverse engineer so we can learn from the event??
This is a good preview of how effective f-16's would be in Ukraine, but substitute a pilot with only 1 year of basic training, passable English and no combat experience, against Russias top fighter pilots in their 5th gen aircraft supported by 10x more ground defense systems...
yeah, i feel sorry for those pilots
Even if you don't win, it's interesting to see how long you can last and the tactics you use to do so.
In reality there are not many Su 57 left, and no A 50 dares to fly..
Would like to see a Glos meteor Vs a me 262 at some point be interesting to see who would of been the better fighter
Slava Russia.
why tho
Correction: 2 SU57 have already been destroyed so far
@@Sbinott0 Yeah, lotsa planes have been destroyed so far. Many on the ground aswell. But which nation ran out of Air Superiority?
@@Gunni1972 mf russia is too scared of flying over Ukr territory and you call that air superiority?
Why were you carrying a targeting pod in an air to air configuration?
IL-2 vs DCS for WW2 fights, which do you prefer and why?