I think they still teach physics and chemistry to make students flexible in their approaches. There might be a time when CSE professionals collaborate with engineers from various backgrounds. Having a basic understanding of physics and chemistry can bridge communication gaps and foster better teamwork. On the other hand, the more you know the more you can see things from different angles to come up with a creative solution. A person like me is also interested in the physical parts of the computer as I am in the software part. And I think Kalvium's priority is making students job ready not the in-depth schooling of engineering itself. Whereas the traditional curriculum is interested in in-depth schooling. The reason why many CSE unemployments is that many of those students are getting poor faculty and guidance, and some even don’t know what they actually want. The Traditional Curriculum is not bad if it reaches students properly.
Hey, What would you like to know about aerospace engineering? Anything specific on your mind? You can also have a look at this article that we find exciting: Aerospace Software Engineer.- www.revelo.com/blog/aerospace-software-engineer
Sir if someone wants to specialize in quantum computing then physics is required right?? If someone wants to develop a software for tracking microorganisms in our blood samples then they required in depth knowledge of biology and chemistry, so there is no subject called useless , computer science is not only software engineering... Its more then that... Cyber physical systems, robotics and automation is the future which required physics knowledge , so don't mislead...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Indeed, computer science goes beyond software engineering-it's about addressing real-world challenges. Equipping the curriculum with critical thinking, mathematical reasoning, and other higher-order thinking skills is essential for students to effectively tackle these challenges.
I think Kalvium's priority is to make you job-ready. Whereas iiith focuses on in-depth schooling. If are interested in jobs then Kalvium is good and if you are interested in research then iiith is good.
I think they still teach physics and chemistry to make students flexible in their approaches. There might be a time when CSE professionals collaborate with engineers from various backgrounds. Having a basic understanding of physics and chemistry can bridge communication gaps and foster better teamwork. On the other hand, the more you know the more you can see things from different angles to come up with a creative solution. A person like me is also interested in the physical parts of the computer as I am in the software part. And I think Kalvium's priority is making students job ready not the in-depth schooling of engineering itself. Whereas the traditional curriculum is interested in in-depth schooling. The reason why many CSE unemployments is that many of those students are getting poor faculty and guidance, and some even don’t know what they actually want. The Traditional Curriculum is not bad if it reaches students properly.
Thanks for sharing your perspective.
Can you put video on Aerospace Engineering sir
Hey, What would you like to know about aerospace engineering? Anything specific on your mind? You can also have a look at this article that we find exciting: Aerospace Software Engineer.- www.revelo.com/blog/aerospace-software-engineer
Sir if someone wants to specialize in quantum computing then physics is required right?? If someone wants to develop a software for tracking microorganisms in our blood samples then they required in depth knowledge of biology and chemistry, so there is no subject called useless , computer science is not only software engineering... Its more then that... Cyber physical systems, robotics and automation is the future which required physics knowledge , so don't mislead...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Indeed, computer science goes beyond software engineering-it's about addressing real-world challenges. Equipping the curriculum with critical thinking, mathematical reasoning, and other higher-order thinking skills is essential for students to effectively tackle these challenges.
It is an earnest request to the KALVIUM AUTHORITY,, RESPECTED SIR TO MAKE A VERY DETIALED INDEPTH VEDIO Comparing IIT HYDERABAD CSD and kalvium's CSE
I think Kalvium's priority is to make you job-ready. Whereas iiith focuses on in-depth schooling. If are interested in jobs then Kalvium is good and if you are interested in research then iiith is good.
Yeah, we're on that. In the meantime, feel free to check out our curriculum here: > bit.ly/44t4ipp