My Indian nephew, as am I, just married a Filipino wife. I am married to the dreaded white straight male, only one of five such interracial marriages amongst our six siblings. Everybody’s family wonders, and asks. It’s so ridiculous to attach any kind of nefarious intention to this kind of question. Just driving families apart.
I certainly wondered what my children would look like. I thought about certain characteristics of myself, my husband and our parents. It's only natural.
I had an interracial relationship. Even I myself was curious. So if anyone asked me how my child will look its not malicious. 2 people from 2 different countries, looks, colour it sounds more genetically interesting. But does the MEGAHEN MEGHAN OR PUPPY HARRY have dev brain.? The answer is No. If you are good inside no bad thoughts dev. Insulting your own family only an imbecile does that
I know - and my friends daughters have similar marriages and they talk openly about prospective children, no hangups. It’s part of the love and anticipation of a new baby!
There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during this interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window. Another thing to note is that the royal family allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and yet the royal family is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of the royal family concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby to Harry? It just does not make sense. Why would anyone be putting their energy to something that they have no control over. They all have their own family, royal duty and commercial dealings with the Duchy to be concerned with. Both Charles and William are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. Prince Phillip famously poured a glass of cordial to the black White House butlers and had a conversation as equals to those butlers. The Queen is a friend of Nelson Mandela and famously had direct line of contact with him whenever one wants to talk to the other. Both the Queen and Prince Phillip have danced with black leaders and hosted events to black Commonwealth leaders over the years to this days. They are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after their own young family in the case of William. Their plate is full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview. It is either that she is just that dumb or she twisted the truth to suit her narrative. Archie’s skin colour being whiter than both his parents is a known fact now and why would Meghan and Harry associate Archie not being given a prince title when Charles become King on Archie’s skin colour now knowing that he is as white as any Caucasian. The reality is Charles always wanted to streamline the monarchy to reduce burden on the taxpayers. It has nothing to do with the colour of Archie’s skin. It has now come out that George V protocol explains why Archie was not entitled to the Prince title and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. Archie not getting the prince title upset them enough to talk about it on international TV, then why did they not ask any family members who would have known the protocol or even any royal aides or staff members who knows the protocol why Archie was not given the prince title. The George V protocol is simple enough to understand. How is it that both Meghan and Harry did not ask those questions when Archie was born. Even if they did not have clarification at Archie’s birth, they had more than 2 years before the OW interview to try to clarify and finds out why Archie is not entitled to the prince title. It is their own responsibility to clarify that and to try to understand that if it bothers them before accusing someone else of something as serious as racism. What they did was irresponsible at best and vindictively malicious at worst.
@@joannelim5483 They could not name anyone without leaving themselves open to being sued for slander. As they contradicted each other, with what they said in the interview, they would find it more than difficult to prove in a court of law that it actually happened or was done with malicious intent.
@@nonaknight9491 HRH can and has been taken away.. his Prince title cant be removed but the Duke title can. He is still using HRH despite it being withdrawn.
@@gladys829 Trouble with that is, everyone knows (some of) what happened with A, but nothing has been legally proven, so the media still have to dance around A, whereas H just blunders in - "Bless him"!
Oh, yes! Cast a shadow upon the entire family without a bit of evidence! Haz was the one who brought it up, NO DOUBT! He’s the only one in the ROYAL FAMILY who made racist comments. It could have been as innocent as his opinion that he wished his child were not so easily sunburned and light skinned, and the other alleged royal agreed. This is such a Weak accusation! Most families wonder what the child will look like. It is by NO MEANS RACIST!
And he has NEVER apologised ever for HIS racism.As a British prince who apparently served his country he should have known what wearing a nazi uniform represents. Yet he wore it.Wheres his formal apology to the Jewish the? Or to the men he insulted using derogatory names?Only person I've ever seen being racist is him.Marrying a woman who is 1/8th black doesn't excuse his behaviour at all.Hes a disgrace
I agree, when people are angry they look for evidence to back their case up, I say ‘evidence’ loosely because in my opinion they have twisted an innocent typical family conversation about the unborn child into something that it never was! In my opinion that is why they haven’t named the person and have left it hanging over the Royals, not nice! The RF would have been flabbergasted with that claim against them, no wonder they said “recollections may vary” as it is not what actually happened! If someone had been truly outright racist towards your unborn child you would say who it was! If it comes out that it was an innocent conversation it will look bad……but not on the RF. Long live our wonderful Queen 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Considering they gave 3 different version of events in 1 interview and lied in the same one several times, I think it is save to say that the whole matter was made up. Besides it was Oprah who claimed it was racism that caused Archie not to be a prince. The wife cleverly said that one could assume that´s the cause. Harry deflected the question, by refusing to comment. It´s a made claim up by insinuation.
@@mcmpositive769 youre so right! narcissists are extremely dangerous. She cut off all communication with both sides of her own family, three of her black relatives said none have ever met Harry or the children, they weren't even invited to the wedding. I knew if she would do them that way she would isolate Harry from his. Typical behavior for narcs.
Yes l don't know why scaby doo and malarkeys keep pushing they didn't. If you tell a friend to tell the author of a book then you contributed. Rats jumping sinking ship
The reporting is still giving veracity to statements Harry and Meghan have made... after a massive lie fest on oprah, unchallenged by the gossip queen, we all know that facts were very low in truth. Meghan was not a hollywood stalwart, nor was she important in the acting world. P charles wanted to issue a point by point statement... perhaps he should have? ! The fact is, Meghan is culturally inappropriate for the RF...she doesnt suit the heirachy, lineage and deference to public service and duty, without a paycheck... she wanted to be *the star* of the Monarchy, but wasnt able to chose the "glam jobs"... Every slight againt the Firm, is a slight against HMTQ, while harry says it isnt... Hes a silly lad...
That, in & of itself does not make the Daily Mail privvy to what actually occurred - or indeed, what was said. I would agree, both the Sussex's have been foolhardy - particularly the wife - tho' that does not let Harry off the hook, either. There's a complicity that runs far deeper than the ensuing argument belies, HLWH; the Mail is a nasty little rag....
@Diane Stubbs - yet, when he was asked to go visit his grandfather... Prince Harry REFUSED !!!!!! and spent time at the beach !!!!!! but Prince Harry RUSHED to his grandfather's funeral, to find out how much was his inheritance !!!!!!
*THEY = SHE* Harry couldn’t have made it clearer during the interview that he had *NO INTEREST IN DISCUSSING IT* when O & M blindsided him with this otherwise non-issue. *THERE IS NO RACIST* this is just 100% Meghan playing her spiteful games. I’ll bet she never names anyone. That’s not her plan. Stirring up people & creating division is her pleasure.
She will never name the name & Harry will never name it because there is no one TO name! It’s a lie or a perverse twisting of words or intent! There is & was no racism!
I don't get it. She admitted they had a part in the book after denying it (only to come out in legal proceedings) but now they say we had nothing to do with the epilogue? I don't believe it. this is previous information they gave the authors, who are now making their last cent while they can. This will probably come out in the Mail's second chance at this.
@@kantigui4837 It is in the court papers,she changed her statement 3 times, she lied under oath as she did in the Opera chat show what a joke , what kind of truthful person will change statement and lie under oath ,once a liar is always a LIAR In fact the defamatory accusation is made by H and M , they lied many times proven lies and made vague accusations with no proof , now that is blackmail and defamation
@@dalidatk7796 Don't bother explaining - there are a couple of 'sugars' on here - it doesn't matter how much evidence there is, and how many lies are proven, they will continue to support M&H without any acknowledgement of the truth.
So, the couple told everything to "friends" & Omid got all his information from the couple's "friends". WHAT "friends"??? Neither one of them HAS any "friends"! That was the first thing Meghan made sure she got rid of!
He said they contributed before it came out. It was their way of setting the record straight. So they think we all forgot all that. Kinda like them wanting privacy🤣🤣🤣
Scobie told that to #MarieClaireUK in March prior to, or right around the release, or hub bub surrounding the release..((ppl have screen shots). The truth will haunt them, they are relying on ppl having short term memory...
The frequent lies that the two of them told in the Oprah interview needs to be repeated when they are discussed. It also bears reminding that the skin color comment was not necessarily racist.
They think us "common folk" are dumb and will believe their lies. Uk adored her, but after the hypocrisy with the private jets, they seen through her very quick. US most Black folks saw though her when she didn't have one black family member but mom, or ANY family at wedding. Her mom all alone looked cold as hell. The sugars seem to b woke white girls, and ppl on Twitter that cuss you out in super broken English. She looks white, I'm obviously black and white girls defending her call me racist bc I don't like her. It's insane. And it is not racist at all to wonder about the baby's pigment. We did bc my hubby is Native American and all our kids are a lil diff shade of beautiful. Sorry to go off, lol🤍
@@tootieramsey9766 I totally agree with you. My family are Scottish and predominantly red hair and blue eyes. Most of the family are the same. My dad is olive skin and black eyes and hair so my brother looks like him and I ended up with hazel eyes and light brown hair. My cousins family married into Italian NY and then her cousin had a baby with a bi-racial woman. That little boy was African/American and looked soo cute.
Only insecure people call that racism! Every family wonders what a baby will look like. Why should it only be allowed about eye color, hair color and caracter. Of course you wonder about skin color when the child is of mixed race!
The panel is missing what's driving this. And why HMTQ has lawyered up. MM's behavior indicates an extreme personality disorder. The untruths, accusations, manipulations & blackmail won't stop. Period. Ever. Look at one of the worst behaviors. The Oprah interview when Prince Philip, H's 99 year old Grandfather, was dying. This video said H & MM talked about naming the "racist" & taking down the Monarchy. Now there's H's upcoming "memoirs". The RF's best (and only) defense is to have no contact w/them & lawyer up. Check out Lady Colin Campbell. She has personal experience w/this type of situation & describes it very well.
OMG, if it was Charles, I wouldn't judge him for it. IF he wondered what the complexion of his unborn grandchild was going to be like, it was very likely normal curiosity. I'm Irish and my h is mixed race, and we all, his family TOO, (Guyanian and the English sides), idly wondered what the children would look like!! We enjoyed these conversations and were curious and excited to 'meet' the baby(babies).
Every parent wonders who the baby will look like.. Harry was quoted that he wanted the baby darker and NOT GINGER.! So why disrespect people born ginger??
As someone with mixed kids it is totally normal. We were all curious bc my husband is native American and I'm black. Our family and we aren't racist we just wondered who the babies would look like. Mom said my first came out lookin like my hubby but crying for her 🤣
There’s different between normal family talks about color of unborn baby and Harry & Meghan who are constantly scrutinized for years by media with insider sources. No one can be at peace in such circumstances, can’t you?
There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during this interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window. Another thing to note is that the royal family allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and yet the royal family is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of the royal family concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby to Harry? It just does not make sense. Why would anyone be putting their energy to something that they have no control over. They all have their own family, royal duty and commercial dealings with the Duchy to be concerned with. Both Charles and William are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. Prince Phillip famously poured a glass of cordial to the black White House butlers and had a conversation as equals to those butlers. The Queen is a friend of Nelson Mandela and famously had direct line of contact with him whenever one wants to talk to the other. Both the Queen and Prince Phillip have danced with black leaders and hosted events to black Commonwealth leaders over the years to this days. They are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after their own young family in the case of William. Their plate is full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview. It is either that she is just that dumb or she twisted the truth to suit her narrative. Archie’s skin colour being whiter than both his parents is a known fact now and why would Meghan and Harry associate Archie not being given a prince title when Charles become King on Archie’s skin colour now knowing that he is as white as any Caucasian. The reality is Charles always wanted to streamline the monarchy to reduce burden on the taxpayers. It has nothing to do with the colour of Archie’s skin. It has now come out that George V protocol explains why Archie was not entitled to the Prince title and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. Archie not getting the prince title upset them enough to talk about it on international TV, then why did they not ask any family members who would have known the protocol or even any royal aides or staff members who knows the protocol why Archie was not given the prince title. The George V protocol is simple enough to understand. How is it that both Meghan and Harry did not ask those questions when Archie was born. Even if they did not have clarification at Archie’s birth, they had more than 2 years before the OW interview to try to clarify and finds out why Archie is not entitled to the prince title. It is their own responsibility to clarify that and to try to understand that if it bothers them before accusing someone else of something as serious as racism. What they did was irresponsible at best and vindictively malicious at worst.
What’s tiring is to blame them for the voluminous amount of fake press that’s headlined about Harry and Meghan everyday as click bait and marketing. They have told us they will not speak to the press other than the one of their own choosing and when they do have something to say, they will say it on their Archwell website. So it’s safe to say that all you hear in the media are old rehashed stories emanating from so-called nameless royal sources and experts, who you all seem to believe. Watch how they no nothing about the couple’s plans or activities, until they’re concluded and they report it on their site. The media and commentators are steps behind them and they’re trying to play catch-up. It’s pathetic watching them flounder and report old or obvious tirades or explain relationships they know nothing about. And mind you, you then turn on the pair based on whatever these liars have made up. Your curiosity and interest about them is what drives the whole sector into this frenzy. When was the last time you heard the couple speak to anybody? They have released a couple of statements and that’s been it. We’ve all read the statements ourselves if we’re interested. Why do we then need royal experts making the rounds of talk shows, and columns for weeks dissecting and explaining every word and punctuation? Just stop. Your hate is ridiculous. Ain’t no way you can love Harry’s family more than him, despite his falling out with any of them if it’s even true. What wou
@@hellabella8295 And yet the Queen talks with them often. Just because you feel betrayed by them opting out of the abusive relationship you guys seem to want your royals to take on without complaint. They paid back your money spent to renovate their home, they gave you a public royal wedding that reimbursed what was spent millions fold, they moved out of your way and stopped receiving your tax payers money, not even on security. Nothing works. The daily abuse continues, even as they’re quietly living their lives. You follow every fake RUclipsr with captions about them and only seem to believe only the negative slanted ones. Something is seriously wrong with you people. If you truly are fed up with them, stop reading about them. Don’t click, don’t open, don’t subscribe, don’t buy. It will be good for your mental health to focus on your family and friends and not these strangers.
@@ARDARadio My hate? I do not hate it is such a waste of time. However I do know when I see a narcissist at play, so please explain to me how two people who continually tell the world to be compassionate are now basically seperated from their families, she has cut most of hers off and he is hell bent on persecuting his. Take your blinkers of love.
@@ARDARadio when does the Queen talk with them???? I’m sure if she does it will be a very cold chat after what they said about Prince Phillip when he was dying
It's all going to change when Prince Charles becomes King. I hope his vision of a slimmed down monarchy is drastic and radical. Why the queen hasn't taken their HRHs off them I don't know. Give them the freedom they are always harping on about.
The Queen knows to remove their Duke and Duchess titles would take an act of Parliament , and then Meagain could use Princess Henry title.That would suit her game...I hope Charles does not give any titles to their children who are being brought up in America anyway...and slims down monarchy to exclude them permanently.
They have had HRH removed. Same as Diana had HRH removed when she was divorced. Harry recently used it but he has no right to it. Prince title cant be removed but Duke can.
Which family has not speculated on how a baby is going to look like. My Nigerian friend married an Irish woman and HE SAID, I hope they are not as dark as me or as white as she, hopefully we get a caramel colored baby. Was he being racist,or was he wondering what his baby will look like. I really don't see an issue with these questions. Only they will turn it into a racist issue.
Exactly! Those sorts of comments should be expected & in no way, is it meant to be a “racist” statement! Curiosity & Racism, are two different matter all together.
Anything for gossip. I dont believe anything that is said. Even if a comment was made it would not be a direct racist remark. Why dont they just s...t up no.
About time the Queen took action. Personally, I don’t believe a word those weasels say. They most probably took some harmless remark and twisted it. Just out of spite.
If it was so hurtful why did hazbeen tell meagain. Why upset a pregnant woman who is depressed. Hazbeen said it was before wedding and only to him. I think him threw a tantrum because the baby didn't get prince title
@@margarethoggan7871 Nothing wrong.with a Scottish title. Prince Philip was mostly known as the Duke.of Edinburgh. Good enough for him then good enough for those two fools offspring
@@marjian6991 Yes you are so right I believe most of the Royals do have a Scottish title and as Scotland is a summer home to most of the Royals a place they all love it is very fitting and in a way a massive honour.
Whilst the press still continue to use the words Racist comments surrounding this allegation you perpetuate what that pair intended. You must STOP calling people racists when they are not! There are plenty of people that truly are.
Not necessarily. Princess Anne merely questioned her suitably, based upon her character. Of course nutmeg only worked 71 days in 18 months, before fleeing to North America.
@@LC_from_MO What was disclosed was that a very close friend of Zara told Lady C regarding the looks of the baby. The context may not have been as they insinuated. They contradicted each other about when the conversation took place and Lady C mentioned more than suitability. I don't think anyone could possibly be that overtly racist.
I wonder if Anne just agreed to take the hit. It could be Anne though. But why would they refute it? Then there'd be another name put out there, and they'd either have to refute or ignore the next name, then the next.
Lady Campbell said princess Ann told Hazbeen Megan wasnt suitable for him or the royal family . F rate actress dodgy past and bad reputation . Then Harry called P Ann a racist in a row . As I understand it . God save our Queen and the british royal family . 🇬🇧
H&M's story doesn't make sense. How can there be a conversation about Archie's skin tone when H said this conversation occurred before they were even married? Years before Archie was conceived. So implausible and obviously contrived.
I also agree that it seemed like an arranged very mean variaty of things they say in the interwiev , intended to hurt and attack RF. Their coldness gave me the chill 🥶 And still does.
It was calculated certainly by Harry after the Oprah interview but by her right from the start. Everyone welcomed her into the RF and thought the two of them would be good for the RF as they were very popular. Unfortunately,she ruined it and we know now it was never her intention not to stay right from the start! They could have done a lot of good promoting various charities etc but she had her own agenda. She was barely in the RF and then left! Harry was the most popular Royal after the Queen,everyone loved his cheekiness etc but also liked him for his dedication to the Invictus Games and Sentebale.
Why did you wonder about a child’s skin tone? I have biracial nephew and nieces and never wonder about their skin tone. All I know, they are beautiful.
@@calmcatalog2058 it’s completely normal to be lovingly curious. Of course they’ll be beautiful, but it’s like wondering what colour hair a baby will have, or who the baby will favour more. Perfectly natural
@@gloriahui3490 it’s not perfectly normal to inquire about an unborn child’s skin color. I have biracial nieces and nephews, that did not come to my mind to ask their parents how dark they would be and the impact of it in society? Next time, pray 4 the baby 2 be healthy.
I have a feeling that the California couple will probably release a photo of lili on her birthday next year because it is in the middle of the queen's jubilee celebrations. I hope that the media don't become distracted by the couples antics during this time. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters; if you don't have integrity, nothing else matters." In my American opinion, people who whine, complain, and air their dirty laundry, like Harry and his wife, have zero integrity. We can only hope that someday those two will become "private" people, and leave the rest of us alone.
And what are your lawmakers doing to stop the vicious attacks on your instuition of monarchy. This isn't family issues any longer, it's attacks on your heritage and tradition.
Yes.... I am not British and I can see it. Years ago it would have been called treason, sedition even. The centuries old approach of militaristic families that emotions are weakness etc is now being challenged by a callous manipulator of emotions. I do hope that the RF win the legal battles against the "public shamers" who call themselves "caring" but are managing to be estranged from every member of both families. Look in the mirror guys and take off you shades! G Ire
At least doing the basic, strip then of United Kingdom titles, remove Harry and his children from the line id succession, strip Meghan of UK citizenship if she has any. Prohibit future royals in direct line of succession from marrying foreign women or they're removed from the line of succession.
@@afrikanheritage99 We don’t need an American to tell us what to do thank you....!!! Sort out your own country 😡.. and it’s only Parliament that have those powers. 🇬🇧
Why in theses segments do the journalist's not bring up that on the operah interview Harry and Meghan's stories about their son's skin colour do not match up? She said it was brought up on multiple occasions while she was pregnant and only to Harry and he said it was only once before they got married....
What's the big deal? I am indian and my husband is white .Both his and my family were also talking about the color of my children skin ,hair and eyes.i feel good in my skin and have no complexes.
I really doubt there is anything the prodigal and his wife can say or do that would "bring down the monarchy". They simply are not that important and not that influential. Nor do I think they were just too honorable to brand a particular royal as racist. The remarks were calculated to implicate everyone. Also Harry's version of the story contradicted her version. They can't even get their story straight between them so have can anyone take what they say as credible?
She already tried to make Philip's funeral all about herself, while sitting there in Monticeto!! I can't imagine what it would have been like , if she were here. She would have strutted around, stroking her moonbump, looking for and smiling at the cameras. And also, pretend - mourning his death. Boo -hoo....
Don't be so naive. Ofcourse MM contributed to this epilogue. She said that she hadn't contributed to the original book and that was found out to be a lie in the court case. Lady C said it was Princess Anne who said to Harry about cultural differences not colour differences. Typical Harry got it wrong. He also gave an interview saying that he started the conversation before MM was pregnant saying I hope any babies won't have "my white skin red hair and freckles and will look more like M.
In Henry IV, Part I, the king rebukes his son, Prince Harry, for shirking his duty and suggests he has "mingled his royalty with cap'ring fools". "For thou has lost thy princely privilege," the monarch berates his heir. "Not an eye / But is aweary of thy common sight."
If they're not going to name the person then I would like to hear the exact comment that was made, so we can judge for ourselves whether the comment really was racist or general human curiosity.
If it had been me, I’d own up and say “So bloody what?” Every family talks about those things when someone’s pregnant! It tells me that Harry and M are the ones with the hangup! Goodness me!
Quite. Apart from a few other facts i.e. 1) the queen, herself, has mixed blood. I was under the impression (e.g. via CRT) that a mixed black blood person can't be a racist. 2) Through her, Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward are also of mixed blood. Harry and William also have Indian blood. 3) They not only allowed Harry to marry his wife, but actually welcomed her, as did most of Britain. Although she is only one quarter black, you can't tell me that members of the RF as so stupid that, having allowed him to marry her, they didn't know her children would have mixed blood, too. 4) The wife consistently identified as Caucasian - so much for any pride in her mixed heritage. 5) The only person in the RF who has been reported to have made racist remarks is Harry, himself (e.g. against Pakistani heritage fellow soldiers). So, is he actually the one who made the comment, or raised the issue? I'm sick to death of the hypocrisy, the lying and the double standards. Literally, unbelievable. I amazed that any thinking person takes their manipulation seriously.
@@petravh4711 It was the only thing they could come up with to throw shade. It’s a very serious accusation to make against anyone. It’s like ringing a fire bell, it’s very hard to unring that bell and people who hear it don’t forget. They wanted to say something to shock everyone and something that’s hard to prove. I do not believe there was any racism from any royals. As you say they are mixed blood too, we probably all are. The royals do not really live sheltered lives, the Queen has met and worked with countless people of all nationalities. They are not so petty and ignorant to have prejudice.
The diagnosis of Narcissism needs to be made and then we can forget the rest. THIS is what they do. WHY? Because they enjoy feeling superior and they enjoy inflicting pain. Ask any Narcissist survivor. The patterns are always the same.
Time to take these two blackmailing grifters HRH titles & out of the line of succession . Both the heirs too . Harry is a disgrace to tarnish the monarchy & all the good it does for charities worldwide .
Stop doing their dirty work!! Again, why are journalists not doing their job? Why is no one really pushing & questioning why their stories are not straight? This is very significant. They said there was a racist conversation and yet their stories about that conversation are SO different. Don’t you think if this was as bad as they say it would be seared in their brains? So why is it so different? One conversation versus conversations. While they were dating versus while pregnant with Archie. This is the hallmark of a lie. That’s why. Meghan threw it out there just like she did with the wedding comment and other lies (17 I believe we are up to?!) and Harry looked startled when it was brought up & he shut it down quickly and looked extremely unnerved. Just like when he put his head down & made a joke when she said they were married 3 days before their actual wedding. Stop bringing this up & doing their dirty work. The discussion should be around all the lies and disproved statements. And every time this subject is brought up they are not “truth bombs” they are allegations, unsupported claims or disproven statements. And yet none of you mentions it ever. Unethical, disgusting, & infuriating.
So for anyone that would like to know why Harry and his wife continue to do this on a daily basis this is the perfect example why Harry’s wife wants attention she wants to be talked about I don’t think Harry does but she does ….greetings from America
For goodness sake stop giving those two airtime no-one gives a damn about their lies we are not the states we do not thrive on back stabbing and celebrity just give it a rest
I think it is all a bit pathetic, why do we bother to even discuss this. It probably was a bit of an. 'off the cuff' remark. I am so bored with this couple and their antics.
My feeling is it might of been a comment like “ Harry I wonder 💭 what the baby will look like! And Harry told nutmeg and they said “ Harry that’s racist they’re concerned 😟 about the babies skin!
Finding Freedom my arse ! These two will hang onto the RF by their teeth because without that connection they are just another pair of celebrities. So the longer the battle goes on , the more it suits them.
You forgot? First they swore they didn't help w the book, then they admitted to helping with the book. Their reality changes with whatever current message they want to the public to believe.
"Could have brought down the Monarchy" Guffaws of upper-class laughter! If I believed it, I still wouldn't care. Harry has said much worse in his drunken youth, and the public gave him the benefit of the doubt - Maybe it WAS Harry who said it! - Even if true, I don't see that some casual remarks about the likely features of an expected infant are so dreadful eg "Let's just hope s/he doesnt inherit granpa's schnozzle!" Thoughtless perhaps, but not the end of the world or monarchy. So tired of all this - and btw, what kind of a dud title is "Finding Freedom"? Freedom from what? Wealth? publicity? Entitlement? I suspect that this goes back to M's disappointment on having landed a Prince, but too late discovering that she was going to be a mere "Duchess" - which is a meaningless title to her dim US fans. "Naming the racist": - any straightforward "revelation" would be such an anticlimax, maybe instead they will make it into a cliff-hanging board-game and market it through Archewell.
Grifters, blackmailing The Queen, but don't put it past her to finesse to their vicious game. How? By saying that SHE said those exact words, and then abdicating the throne after her Jubilee to which they aren't invited! NONONONONO. Don't invite them back in! THEY SAID IT! BAN THEM!
This loathsome duo harkles r a nightmare. When they disrespect their family they disrespect themselves. Instead of trying to rise above their so called supposedly unfairness by RF by doing good works, setting good examples, they decided to take revenge by making unjustified allegations, now this is meghain's attacks/blackmail & harry the turncoat has no mind 9f his own it's been hijacked by his wife.
It's perfectly normal to ask a person going into an interracial marriage if they're prepared to deal with the child's skin colour! After all... it's the child who gets teased and bullied? It's not as easy as one thinks.
Has no one noticed that as the remark was supposed to have been made to Harry , he was trying to say that it was ages ago, but was quickly shut up by Meg squeezing his hand and talking him down ,so I don’t think it was anything to do with Archie and just a general question to Harry about how he felt about the subject of color as he had been in trouble in the past for racist comments ! Subsequently Megan had made it something that had been said to her on several occasions ! A big change made in one interview !
Sick and tired of the Harkles when around the world we are having too many problems!!!! Queen Elizabeth is admired and respected worldwide! Harry shame on you!!!
Lady Colin Campbell said it was Princess Anne!!! Normal curiosity! Nothing racist about it. Let's be real, Rachel is hands on/controlling about everything. Of course, she gave Scooby-Doo information for the book. Thank goodness, the Queen is going to lawyer up to protect the family from the nefarious couple. Rachel is bold to think she can go up against the Queen.
It has been reported elsewhere that it was Harry who made that comment. Joking around one day when he had just started dating her, and not later when she was “pregnant”. No wonder #6 and his first wife won’t reveal the name.
Hearing Haz's version will now be seen as just a laugh at how far , under Meg's tutelage of "fake it til you make it", will go. Who did she study under?
If you listened to the interview, Harry said the comment was made before he married Meghan. I think it has been blown out of proportion. We wonder all sorts of things about what babies will look like. Will they have curly hair or straight, will they tan like Dad or burn like Mom, what color will their eyes be. It's ridiculous. I hope they don't get an invite to her Majesty's celebration. They don't deserve an invite.
It`s only natural, to wonder who an unborn baby will take after. I am sure we have all said something along those lines. This is not imho a racist remark.
Thank goodness - H&M must be the most disliked and vile couple that the world has seen in decades. I'm so sorry for the Royal Family and particularly The Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William. The British forces have also faced astonishing betrayal by someone who made vows to them and The Queen. For H still to be whining about losing his honourary titles, despite walking away from his obligations and country (lets not forget the astonishing Disney debacle) is tone deaf and childishly petulant.
This is a family built on colonialism and racism. Why did they not have a black person in their panel maybe people out there will understand what is racism or colonial tone
Nothing funny about two 40 year olds crying they were cut off and blackmailing their own family. She has cut off both sides of her family. What does that say about her???
Media is giving them too much publicity. I don"t think many people care about them or the book. I am an American and hope the RF takes their titles and no longer considered part of the RF.
As HMTQ succinctly stated " some recollections may vary"! Any conversation or question about skin tone/complexion was natural curious. Bringing it up in the interview was thoroughly thought out and calculated to embarrass and discredit the RF.
This couple is full of it. Now they want an audience with the Queen. “Recollections May differ”. True black mail! William already said “We are NOT a racist family.
I would wonder if the little one might have a birth defect and that's why she has not been presented in public. I might be wrong, and hope that I am, it's just that Meg likes to be " top peg" and avoids betraying any sign of weakness. G Ire
The new dolls not ready yet. Megsey keeps getting Botox and getting lighter skinned. Longer extensions. Looking like Octomom more every . unpleasant pic we get pushed in our faces
My Indian nephew, as am I, just married a Filipino wife. I am married to the dreaded white straight male, only one of five such interracial marriages amongst our six siblings. Everybody’s family wonders, and asks. It’s so ridiculous to attach any kind of nefarious intention to this kind of question. Just driving families apart.
I certainly wondered what my children would look like. I thought about certain characteristics of myself, my husband and our parents. It's only natural.
I had an interracial relationship. Even I myself was curious. So if anyone asked me how my child will look its not malicious.
2 people from 2 different countries, looks, colour it sounds more genetically interesting.
But does the MEGAHEN MEGHAN OR PUPPY HARRY have dev brain.? The answer is No.
If you are good inside no bad thoughts dev.
Insulting your own family only an imbecile does that
I know - and my friends daughters have similar marriages and they talk openly about prospective children, no hangups. It’s part of the love and anticipation of a new baby!
There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during this interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window.
Another thing to note is that the royal family allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and yet the royal family is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of the royal family concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby to Harry? It just does not make sense. Why would anyone be putting their energy to something that they have no control over. They all have their own family, royal duty and commercial dealings with the Duchy to be concerned with.
Both Charles and William are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. Prince Phillip famously poured a glass of cordial to the black White House butlers and had a conversation as equals to those butlers. The Queen is a friend of Nelson Mandela and famously had direct line of contact with him whenever one wants to talk to the other. Both the Queen and Prince Phillip have danced with black leaders and hosted events to black Commonwealth leaders over the years to this days. They are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after their own young family in the case of William. Their plate is full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview. It is either that she is just that dumb or she twisted the truth to suit her narrative.
Archie’s skin colour being whiter than both his parents is a known fact now and why would Meghan and Harry associate Archie not being given a prince title when Charles become King on Archie’s skin colour now knowing that he is as white as any Caucasian. The reality is Charles always wanted to streamline the monarchy to reduce burden on the taxpayers. It has nothing to do with the colour of Archie’s skin.
It has now come out that George V protocol explains why Archie was not entitled to the Prince title and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. Archie not getting the prince title upset them enough to talk about it on international TV, then why did they not ask any family members who would have known the protocol or even any royal aides or staff members who knows the protocol why Archie was not given the prince title. The George V protocol is simple enough to understand. How is it that both Meghan and Harry did not ask those questions when Archie was born. Even if they did not have clarification at Archie’s birth, they had more than 2 years before the OW interview to try to clarify and finds out why Archie is not entitled to the prince title. It is their own responsibility to clarify that and to try to understand that if it bothers them before accusing someone else of something as serious as racism. What they did was irresponsible at best and vindictively malicious at worst.
@@joannelim5483 They could not name anyone without leaving themselves open to being sued for slander. As they contradicted each other, with what they said in the interview, they would find it more than difficult to prove in a court of law that it actually happened or was done with malicious intent.
Past time Harry had HRH removed.
🇬🇧Harry was born a PRINCE that title cannot be taken away
@@nonaknight9491 HRH can and has been taken away.. his Prince title cant be removed but the Duke title can. He is still using HRH despite it being withdrawn.
@@fabulousnewt770 no he is not he is barely going as a Prince. He told the world just to call him Harry.
They should start with Andrew then go to Harry.
@@gladys829 Trouble with that is, everyone knows (some of) what happened with A, but nothing has been legally proven, so the media still have to dance around A, whereas H just blunders in - "Bless him"!
Oh, yes! Cast a shadow upon the entire family without a bit of evidence! Haz was the one who brought it up, NO DOUBT! He’s the only one in the ROYAL FAMILY who made racist comments. It could have been as innocent as his opinion that he wished his child were not so easily sunburned and light skinned, and the other alleged royal agreed. This is such a Weak accusation! Most families wonder what the child will look like. It is by NO MEANS RACIST!
Exactly. He's the one who wore a Nazi costume
And he has NEVER apologised ever for HIS racism.As a British prince who apparently served his country he should have known what wearing a nazi uniform represents. Yet he wore it.Wheres his formal apology to the Jewish the? Or to the men he insulted using derogatory names?Only person I've ever seen being racist is him.Marrying a woman who is 1/8th black doesn't excuse his behaviour at all.Hes a disgrace
I agree, when people are angry they look for evidence to back their case up, I say ‘evidence’ loosely because in my opinion they have twisted an innocent typical family conversation about the unborn child into something that it never was! In my opinion that is why they haven’t named the person and have left it hanging over the Royals, not nice! The RF would have been flabbergasted with that claim against them, no wonder they said “recollections may vary” as it is not what actually happened! If someone had been truly outright racist towards your unborn child you would say who it was! If it comes out that it was an innocent conversation it will look bad……but not on the RF. Long live our wonderful Queen 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Considering they gave 3 different version of events in 1 interview and lied in the same one several times, I think it is save to say that the whole matter was made up. Besides it was Oprah who claimed it was racism that caused Archie not to be a prince. The wife cleverly said that one could assume that´s the cause. Harry deflected the question, by refusing to comment. It´s a made claim up by insinuation.
So true. Queen Oprah pushed that. She and Gayle are probably laughing as to how they turned something innocent into racism.
When will they have enough money to leave the rest of us alone? They are thoroughly unpleasant people.
They also want fame and this is the only way they know how to get it. Trash the royals.
@@darlene6531
The RF is messing with the wrong person.
@@mcmpositive769 who do you mean ? The ex actress ? Surely not
@Cheryl Woodruff speak for yourself - I would never ever do to my family what they’ve done to his .
@@mcmpositive769 youre so right! narcissists are extremely dangerous. She cut off all communication with both sides of her own family, three of her black relatives said none have ever met Harry or the children, they weren't even invited to the wedding. I knew if she would do them that way she would isolate Harry from his. Typical behavior for narcs.
Meghan did contribute to the book.It was confirmed in court.So please report accurately.
It's impossible for this newspaper to proffer accurate reportage, Moonbeams - they're the Daily Mail !!
Yes l don't know why scaby doo and malarkeys keep pushing they didn't. If you tell a friend to tell the author of a book then you contributed. Rats jumping sinking ship
@@andrewtongue7084 But the Mail needed that court evidence for their appeal.
The reporting is still giving veracity to statements Harry and Meghan have made...
after a massive lie fest on oprah, unchallenged by the gossip queen, we all know that facts were very low in truth.
Meghan was not a hollywood stalwart, nor was she important in the acting world.
P charles wanted to issue a point by point statement...
perhaps he should have? !
The fact is, Meghan is culturally inappropriate for the RF...she doesnt suit the heirachy, lineage and deference to public service and duty, without a paycheck...
she wanted to be *the star* of the Monarchy, but wasnt able to chose the "glam jobs"...
Every slight againt the Firm, is a slight against HMTQ, while harry says it isnt...
Hes a silly lad...
That, in & of itself does not make the Daily Mail privvy to what actually occurred - or indeed, what was said. I would agree, both the Sussex's have been foolhardy - particularly the wife - tho' that does not let Harry off the hook, either. There's a complicity that runs far deeper than the ensuing argument belies, HLWH; the Mail is a nasty little rag....
Everyone who cares about the royal family was relieved and gladdened that Megs wasn’t at the funeral.
She still tried to hijack it with her pretentious posts and the wreath that was even merchandised.
Yes he should have stayed away ,As he thinks nothing about his family ,
@@junemusgrove3002 so Harry should have stayed away from his grandfather’s funeral?
@@gladys829 Definitly
@Diane Stubbs - yet, when he was asked to go visit his grandfather...
Prince Harry REFUSED !!!!!!
and spent time at the beach !!!!!!
but Prince Harry RUSHED to his grandfather's funeral, to find out how much was his inheritance !!!!!!
*THEY = SHE* Harry couldn’t have made it clearer during the interview that he had *NO INTEREST IN DISCUSSING IT* when O & M blindsided him with this otherwise non-issue. *THERE IS NO RACIST* this is just 100% Meghan playing her spiteful games. I’ll bet she never names anyone. That’s not her plan. Stirring up people & creating division is her pleasure.
She will never name the name & Harry will never name it because there is no one TO name! It’s a lie or a perverse twisting of words or intent! There is & was no racism!
@@patriciawaske7760 Spot on
💯👍👍
Well said !
So very true!
To be curious about the possible skin color does not mean rasist intent!
I don't get it. She admitted they had a part in the book after denying it (only to come out in legal proceedings) but now they say we had nothing to do with the epilogue? I don't believe it. this is previous information they gave the authors, who are now making their last cent while they can. This will probably come out in the Mail's second chance at this.
That woman couldn't lie straight in bed.
you were there to endorse such a defamatory accusation, you are jokes with the tabloid friends of the monarchy.
@@kantigui4837 It is in the court papers,she changed her statement 3 times, she lied under oath as she did in the Opera chat show what a joke , what kind of truthful person will change statement and lie under oath ,once a liar is always a LIAR
In fact the defamatory accusation is made by H and M , they lied many times proven lies and made vague accusations with no proof , now that is blackmail and defamation
@@dalidatk7796 Don't bother explaining - there are a couple of 'sugars' on here - it doesn't matter how much evidence there is, and how many lies are proven, they will continue to support M&H without any acknowledgement of the truth.
@lexie r stop with the white, black, them, their. They are two people. One is a narcissistic leader, the other a hapless follower of said narcissist.
So, the couple told everything to "friends" & Omid got all his information from the couple's "friends". WHAT "friends"??? Neither one of them HAS any "friends"! That was the first thing Meghan made sure she got rid of!
Friends - called fools like NutMeg
He said they contributed before it came out. It was their way of setting the record straight. So they think we all forgot all that. Kinda like them wanting privacy🤣🤣🤣
Yea, what friends? She could not even find 30 to sign on to the 40x40 copy cat initiative.
I think they are going to find out that the Queen has many, many more friends than them , and she will not have to pay for their loyalty either !
Well, considering Harry's friends were called "hooray Henrys", that's probably not a bad thing.
She admitted to Judge Warby during her Mail on Sunday case, the had contributed to Scobies book.
🎯🎯🎯
Yes, and you'd think that a "Daily Mail" journalist would have pointed that out!
Scobie told that to #MarieClaireUK in March prior to, or right around the release, or hub bub surrounding the release..((ppl have screen shots). The truth will haunt them, they are relying on ppl having short term memory...
The frequent lies that the two of them told in the Oprah interview needs to be repeated when they are discussed. It also bears reminding that the skin color comment was not necessarily racist.
They think us "common folk" are dumb and will believe their lies. Uk adored her, but after the hypocrisy with the private jets, they seen through her very quick. US most Black folks saw though her when she didn't have one black family member but mom, or ANY family at wedding. Her mom all alone looked cold as hell. The sugars seem to b woke white girls, and ppl on Twitter that cuss you out in super broken English. She looks white, I'm obviously black and white girls defending her call me racist bc I don't like her. It's insane. And it is not racist at all to wonder about the baby's pigment. We did bc my hubby is Native American and all our kids are a lil diff shade of beautiful. Sorry to go off, lol🤍
@@tootieramsey9766 I totally agree with you. My family are Scottish and predominantly red hair and blue eyes. Most of the family are the same. My dad is olive skin and black eyes and hair so my brother looks like him and I ended up with hazel eyes and light brown hair. My cousins family married into Italian NY and then her cousin had a baby with a bi-racial woman. That little boy was African/American and looked soo cute.
Oprah loved the racist claim...What? What? What?
Darlene, exactly, totally agree with you.
Only insecure people call that racism! Every family wonders what a baby will look like. Why should it only be allowed about eye color, hair color and caracter. Of course you wonder about skin color when the child is of mixed race!
After how badly beg behaves at weddings who would want her at a funeral. Especially as he was dying she was bashing his wife.
Bingo!!!!
PS the name Beg is absolutely fitting and brilliant for the grifter!!
Beg 🤣🤣🤣
The panel is missing what's driving this. And why HMTQ has lawyered up. MM's behavior indicates an extreme
personality disorder. The untruths, accusations, manipulations & blackmail won't stop. Period. Ever. Look at one of the worst behaviors. The Oprah interview when Prince Philip, H's 99 year old Grandfather, was dying. This video said H & MM talked about naming the "racist" & taking down the Monarchy. Now there's H's upcoming "memoirs". The RF's best (and only) defense is to have no contact w/them & lawyer up. Check out Lady Colin Campbell. She has personal experience w/this type of situation & describes it very well.
BEST POST!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMG, if it was Charles, I wouldn't judge him for it. IF he wondered what the complexion of his unborn grandchild was going to be like, it was very likely normal curiosity. I'm Irish and my h is mixed race, and we all, his family TOO, (Guyanian and the English sides), idly wondered what the children would look like!! We enjoyed these conversations and were curious and excited to 'meet' the baby(babies).
Every parent wonders who the baby will look like.. Harry was quoted that he wanted the baby darker and NOT GINGER.! So why disrespect people born ginger??
Three of my grandchildren are biracial and all of us wondered who they might resemble. They are all beautiful 💙💙💖
As someone with mixed kids it is totally normal. We were all curious bc my husband is native American and I'm black. Our family and we aren't racist we just wondered who the babies would look like. Mom said my first came out lookin like my hubby but crying for her 🤣
There’s different between normal family talks about color of unborn baby and Harry & Meghan who are constantly scrutinized for years by media with insider sources. No one can be at peace in such circumstances, can’t you?
There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during this interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window.
Another thing to note is that the royal family allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and yet the royal family is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of the royal family concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby to Harry? It just does not make sense. Why would anyone be putting their energy to something that they have no control over. They all have their own family, royal duty and commercial dealings with the Duchy to be concerned with.
Both Charles and William are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. Prince Phillip famously poured a glass of cordial to the black White House butlers and had a conversation as equals to those butlers. The Queen is a friend of Nelson Mandela and famously had direct line of contact with him whenever one wants to talk to the other. Both the Queen and Prince Phillip have danced with black leaders and hosted events to black Commonwealth leaders over the years to this days. They are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after their own young family in the case of William. Their plate is full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview. It is either that she is just that dumb or she twisted the truth to suit her narrative.
Archie’s skin colour being whiter than both his parents is a known fact now and why would Meghan and Harry associate Archie not being given a prince title when Charles become King on Archie’s skin colour now knowing that he is as white as any Caucasian. The reality is Charles always wanted to streamline the monarchy to reduce burden on the taxpayers. It has nothing to do with the colour of Archie’s skin.
It has now come out that George V protocol explains why Archie was not entitled to the Prince title and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. Archie not getting the prince title upset them enough to talk about it on international TV, then why did they not ask any family members who would have known the protocol or even any royal aides or staff members who knows the protocol why Archie was not given the prince title. The George V protocol is simple enough to understand. How is it that both Meghan and Harry did not ask those questions when Archie was born. Even if they did not have clarification at Archie’s birth, they had more than 2 years before the OW interview to try to clarify and finds out why Archie is not entitled to the prince title. It is their own responsibility to clarify that and to try to understand that if it bothers them before accusing someone else of something as serious as racism. What they did was irresponsible at best and vindictively malicious at worst.
So tedious watching this spoiled pair of brats, attacking anyone who doesn't paint them in the limelight they believe they should be under.
I agree! It’s so tiring putting up with that pair of imbeciles! The poor queen.. they can NEVER BE FORGIVEN!
What’s tiring is to blame them for the voluminous amount of fake press that’s headlined about Harry and Meghan everyday as click bait and marketing. They have told us they will not speak to the press other than the one of their own choosing and when they do have something to say, they will say it on their Archwell website. So it’s safe to say that all you hear in the media are old rehashed stories emanating from so-called nameless royal sources and experts, who you all seem to believe. Watch how they no nothing about the couple’s plans or activities, until they’re concluded and they report it on their site. The media and commentators are steps behind them and they’re trying to play catch-up. It’s pathetic watching them flounder and report old or obvious tirades or explain relationships they know nothing about. And mind you, you then turn on the pair based on whatever these liars have made up. Your curiosity and interest about them is what drives the whole sector into this frenzy. When was the last time you heard the couple speak to anybody? They have released a couple of statements and that’s been it. We’ve all read the statements ourselves if we’re interested. Why do we then need royal experts making the rounds of talk shows, and columns for weeks dissecting and explaining every word and punctuation? Just stop. Your hate is ridiculous. Ain’t no way you can love Harry’s family more than him, despite his falling out with any of them if it’s even true.
What wou
@@hellabella8295 And yet the Queen talks with them often. Just because you feel betrayed by them opting out of the abusive relationship you guys seem to want your royals to take on without complaint. They paid back your money spent to renovate their home, they gave you a public royal wedding that reimbursed what was spent millions fold, they moved out of your way and stopped receiving your tax payers money, not even on security. Nothing works. The daily abuse continues, even as they’re quietly living their lives. You follow every fake RUclipsr with captions about them and only seem to believe only the negative slanted ones. Something is seriously wrong with you people. If you truly are fed up with them, stop reading about them. Don’t click, don’t open, don’t subscribe, don’t buy. It will be good for your mental health to focus on your family and friends and not these strangers.
@@ARDARadio My hate? I do not hate it is such a waste of time. However I do know when I see a narcissist at play, so please explain to me how two people who continually tell the world to be compassionate are now basically seperated from their families, she has cut most of hers off and he is hell bent on persecuting his. Take your blinkers of love.
@@ARDARadio when does the Queen talk with them???? I’m sure if she does it will be a very cold chat after what they said about Prince Phillip when he was dying
It's all going to change when Prince Charles becomes King. I hope his vision of a slimmed down monarchy is drastic and radical. Why the queen hasn't taken their HRHs off them I don't know. Give them the freedom they are always harping on about.
I wonder if the reason they have not removed it is to have something they want and need to hold over their heads.
The Queen knows to remove their Duke and Duchess titles would take an act of Parliament , and then Meagain could use Princess Henry title.That would suit her game...I hope Charles does not give any titles to their children who are being brought up in America anyway...and slims down monarchy to exclude them permanently.
They have had HRH removed. Same as Diana had HRH removed when she was divorced. Harry recently used it but he has no right to it. Prince title cant be removed but Duke can.
@@fabulousnewt770When did he use it?
@@belescli on Lilibets birth cert.
So, if they aren't involved with Omid Scobie, then why aren't they sueing him like they do to everyone else.
I saw an article they "could" sue. But, why wait a year?!? So transparent.
I believe it’s right around the corner they are just not through with him yet ‼️
Which family has not speculated on how a baby is going to look like. My Nigerian friend married an Irish woman and HE SAID, I hope they are not as dark as me or as white as she, hopefully we get a caramel colored baby. Was he being racist,or was he wondering what his baby will look like. I really don't see an issue with these questions. Only they will turn it into a racist issue.
👏👏👏👏
Exactly! Those sorts of comments should be expected & in no way, is it meant to be a “racist” statement! Curiosity & Racism, are two different matter all together.
Yes Richard. It most definitely is disgusting.
Meg confessed in court she helped omid with the book. No doubt the 30 pages extra too.and no one made racist remarks its a lie.
Anything for gossip. I dont believe anything that is said. Even if a comment was made it would not be a direct racist remark. Why dont they just s...t up no.
About time the Queen took action. Personally, I don’t believe a word those weasels say. They most probably took some harmless remark and twisted it. Just out of spite.
It’s Parliament that have those powers NOT our Queen..
If it was so hurtful why did hazbeen tell meagain. Why upset a pregnant woman who is depressed. Hazbeen said it was before wedding and only to him. I think him threw a tantrum because the baby didn't get prince title
@@lizwhittleston5963 baby A got a title albeit was a Scottish title and they refused it !.
@@margarethoggan7871 Nothing wrong.with a Scottish title. Prince Philip was mostly known as the Duke.of Edinburgh. Good enough for him then good enough for those two fools offspring
@@marjian6991 Yes you are so right I believe most of the Royals do have a Scottish title and as Scotland is a summer home to most of the Royals a place they all love it is very fitting and in a way a massive honour.
Whilst the press still continue to use the words Racist comments surrounding this allegation you perpetuate what that pair intended. You must STOP calling people racists when they are not! There are plenty of people that truly are.
Lady Colin Campbell said it was Princess Anne and it was never refuted.
Not necessarily. Princess Anne merely questioned her suitably, based upon her character. Of course nutmeg only worked 71 days in 18 months, before fleeing to North America.
@@LC_from_MO What was disclosed was that a very close friend of Zara told Lady C regarding the looks of the baby. The context may not have been as they insinuated. They contradicted each other about when the conversation took place and Lady C mentioned more than suitability. I don't think anyone could possibly be that overtly racist.
@@SueProv I’m absolutely sure, based
I wonder if Anne just agreed to take the hit. It could be Anne though. But why would they refute it? Then there'd be another name put out there, and they'd either have to refute or ignore the next name, then the next.
Lady Campbell said princess Ann told Hazbeen Megan wasnt suitable for him or the royal family . F rate actress dodgy past and bad reputation . Then Harry called P Ann a racist in a row . As I understand it . God save our Queen and the british royal family . 🇬🇧
H&M's story doesn't make sense. How can there be a conversation about Archie's skin tone when H said this conversation occurred before they were even married? Years before Archie was conceived. So implausible and obviously contrived.
I also agree that it seemed like an arranged very mean variaty of things they say in the interwiev , intended to hurt and attack RF. Their coldness gave me the chill 🥶
And still does.
Exactly!
It was calculated certainly by Harry after the Oprah interview but by her right from the start. Everyone welcomed her into the RF and thought the two of them would be good for the RF as they were very popular. Unfortunately,she ruined it and we know now it was never her intention not to stay right from the start! They could have done a lot of good promoting various charities etc but she had her own agenda. She was barely in the RF and then left!
Harry was the most popular Royal after the Queen,everyone loved his cheekiness etc but also liked him for his dedication to the Invictus Games and Sentebale.
Sue the harkles for a billion dollars !
My grandson married a jamaican girl and when she was pregnant we all wondered about skin tone but in a loving way. All mixed families do
Why did you wonder about a child’s skin tone? I have biracial nephew and nieces and never wonder about their skin tone. All I know, they are beautiful.
🎯 TOTALLY
@@calmcatalog2058 it’s completely normal to be lovingly curious. Of course they’ll be beautiful, but it’s like wondering what colour hair a baby will have, or who the baby will favour more. Perfectly natural
@@gloriahui3490 it’s not perfectly normal to inquire about an unborn child’s skin color. I have biracial nieces and nephews, that did not come to my mind to ask their parents how dark they would be and the impact of it in society? Next time, pray 4 the baby 2 be healthy.
Only insecure people would call that racism!
I have a feeling that the California couple will probably release a photo of lili on her birthday next year because it is in the middle of the queen's jubilee celebrations.
I hope that the media don't become distracted by the couples antics during this time. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
Oh yes Vicky I think you have it there...
Their little Lilibet will outshine the older Lilibet! Just the thing they'd plan! G Ire
Lillywhite.
70 years! I hope that she makes it.
Who cares? No-one's interested after all this time and our attentions are going to our wonderful Queen.
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters; if you don't have integrity, nothing else matters." In my American opinion, people who whine, complain, and air their dirty laundry, like Harry and his wife, have zero integrity. We can only hope that someday those two will become "private" people, and leave the rest of us alone.
No chance needs to be number 1
We were all pleased she didn’t come to the funeral..... I hope they ( m and h) get slapped down pretty hard financially and have titles removed!
Sheila.that.what.you.wont...
Any.financially.you.hate
Harryn.meghan.they.are .love.
By.god.
Monty Python's boot is falling on these two gnats.
And what are your lawmakers doing to stop the vicious attacks on your instuition of monarchy. This isn't family issues any longer, it's attacks on your heritage and tradition.
Yes.... I am not British and I can see it.
Years ago it would have been called treason, sedition even. The centuries old approach of militaristic families that emotions are weakness etc is now being challenged by a callous manipulator of emotions. I do hope that the RF win the legal battles against the "public shamers" who call themselves "caring" but are managing to be estranged from every member of both families. Look in the mirror guys and take off you shades! G Ire
At least doing the basic, strip then of United Kingdom titles, remove Harry and his children from the line id succession, strip Meghan of UK citizenship if she has any. Prohibit future royals in direct line of succession from marrying foreign women or they're removed from the line of succession.
@@afrikanheritage99 We don’t need an American to tell us what to do thank you....!!! Sort out your own country 😡.. and it’s only Parliament that have those powers. 🇬🇧
They need to be reminded of what happens when you poke a very well funded sleeping bear.
😂😂😂 my sentiments exactly !! What idiots they are - Hazbeen should know better
They cannot name any specific person because it is a figment of her delusion or a baseless lie she pulls out of her rear end.
Why in theses segments do the journalist's not bring up that on the operah interview Harry and Meghan's stories about their son's skin colour do not match up? She said it was brought up on multiple occasions while she was pregnant and only to Harry and he said it was only once before they got married....
What's the big deal? I am indian and my husband is white .Both his and my family were also talking about the color of my children skin ,hair and eyes.i feel good in my skin and have no complexes.
I really doubt there is anything the prodigal and his wife can say or do that would "bring down the monarchy". They simply are not that important and not that influential. Nor do I think they were just too honorable to brand a particular royal as racist. The remarks were calculated to implicate everyone. Also Harry's version of the story contradicted her version. They can't even get their story straight between them so have can anyone take what they say as credible?
SMH
Cannot believe that the most powerful woman in the world is not putting an end to H&M nonsense??????.
You couldn't make it up!!! Jcm
She already tried to make Philip's funeral all about herself, while sitting there in Monticeto!! I can't imagine what it would have been like , if she were here. She would have strutted around, stroking her moonbump, looking for and smiling at the cameras. And also, pretend - mourning his death. Boo -hoo....
Don't be so naive. Ofcourse MM contributed to this epilogue. She said that she hadn't contributed to the original book and that was found out to be a lie in the court case. Lady C said it was Princess Anne who said to Harry about cultural differences not colour differences. Typical Harry got it wrong. He also gave an interview saying that he started the conversation before MM was pregnant saying I hope any babies won't have "my white skin red hair and freckles and will look more like M.
In Henry IV, Part I, the king rebukes his son, Prince Harry, for shirking his duty and suggests he has "mingled his royalty with cap'ring fools".
"For thou has lost thy princely privilege," the monarch berates his heir. "Not an eye / But is aweary of thy common sight."
Well get on with it then, and name them! Publish and be damned! No one is interested!!
If they're not going to name the person then I would like to hear the exact comment that was made, so we can judge for ourselves whether the comment really was racist or general human curiosity.
They won't name the
person because it was never said, unless, as I think, it was Haz himself!
They couldn't even agree when the remark was made.
Does the royal family have the ability to file a cease and desist order or is that Just in the US?
Sick of h&m BS.
No one cares about H&M they will be forgotten long before our beloved Queen .
If it had been me, I’d own up and say “So bloody what?”
Every family talks about those things when someone’s pregnant!
It tells me that Harry and M are the ones with the hangup! Goodness me!
Quite. Apart from a few other facts i.e. 1) the queen, herself, has mixed blood. I was under the impression (e.g. via CRT) that a mixed black blood person can't be a racist. 2) Through her, Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward are also of mixed blood. Harry and William also have Indian blood. 3) They not only allowed Harry to marry his wife, but actually welcomed her, as did most of Britain. Although she is only one quarter black, you can't tell me that members of the RF as so stupid that, having allowed him to marry her, they didn't know her children would have mixed blood, too. 4) The wife consistently identified as Caucasian - so much for any pride in her mixed heritage. 5) The only person in the RF who has been reported to have made racist remarks is Harry, himself (e.g. against Pakistani heritage fellow soldiers). So, is he actually the one who made the comment, or raised the issue? I'm sick to death of the hypocrisy, the lying and the double standards. Literally, unbelievable. I amazed that any thinking person takes their manipulation seriously.
@@petravh4711 It was the only thing they could come up with to throw shade.
It’s a very serious accusation to make against anyone. It’s like ringing a fire bell, it’s very hard to unring that bell and people who hear it don’t forget.
They wanted to say something to shock everyone and something that’s hard to prove.
I do not believe there was any racism from any royals. As you say they are mixed blood too, we probably all are.
The royals do not really live sheltered lives, the Queen has met and worked with countless people of all nationalities. They are not so petty and ignorant to have prejudice.
I could care less who it was. It was a simple question that many people talk about when there’s a mix race couple!
The diagnosis of Narcissism needs to be made and then we can forget the rest. THIS is what they do. WHY? Because they enjoy feeling superior and they enjoy inflicting pain. Ask any Narcissist survivor. The patterns are always the same.
Has it occurred to anyone that maggot and hangdog are LYing
Time to take these two blackmailing grifters HRH titles & out of the line of succession . Both the heirs too . Harry is a disgrace to tarnish the monarchy & all the good it does for charities worldwide .
Stop doing their dirty work!! Again, why are journalists not doing their job? Why is no one really pushing & questioning why their stories are not straight? This is very significant. They said there was a racist conversation and yet their stories about that conversation are SO different. Don’t you think if this was as bad as they say it would be seared in their brains? So why is it so different? One conversation versus conversations. While they were dating versus while pregnant with Archie. This is the hallmark of a lie. That’s why.
Meghan threw it out there just like she did with the wedding comment and other lies (17 I believe we are up to?!) and Harry looked startled when it was brought up & he shut it down quickly and looked extremely unnerved. Just like when he put his head down & made a joke when she said they were married 3 days before their actual wedding.
Stop bringing this up & doing their dirty work. The discussion should be around all the lies and disproved statements. And every time this subject is brought up they are not “truth bombs” they are allegations, unsupported claims or disproven statements. And yet none of you mentions it ever. Unethical, disgusting, & infuriating.
So for anyone that would like to know why Harry and his wife continue to do this on a daily basis this is the perfect example why Harry’s wife wants attention she wants to be talked about I don’t think Harry does but she does ….greetings from America
The toxic duo can get lost!
They have no evidence for their claim. They can be sued if they name the person they claim said that.
They have evidence.
For goodness sake stop giving those two airtime no-one gives a damn about their lies we are not the states we do not thrive on back stabbing and celebrity just give it a rest
I think it is all a bit pathetic, why do we bother to even discuss this. It probably was a bit of an. 'off the cuff' remark. I am so bored with this couple and their antics.
They didn't name the person because it isn't true, and they would be hit with a big libel suit.
That’s what I think too !!
They are already sold their soul to devils why not?
My feeling is it might of been a comment like “ Harry I wonder 💭 what the baby will look like! And Harry told nutmeg and they said “ Harry that’s racist they’re concerned 😟 about the babies skin!
Finding Freedom my arse ! These two will hang onto the RF by their teeth because without that connection they are just another pair of celebrities. So the longer the battle goes on , the more it suits them.
are you kidding MEGAIN was the ghost writer for this book, it came out that she gave info to this book in the Daily Mail lawsuit.
You forgot? First they swore they didn't help w the book, then they admitted to helping with the book. Their reality changes with whatever current message they want to the public to believe.
Meghan and Harry definition of a nightmare.
We all know it was Harry! Get some true news, not speculative!
"Could have brought down the Monarchy" Guffaws of upper-class laughter! If I believed it, I still wouldn't care. Harry has said much worse in his drunken youth, and the public gave him the benefit of the doubt - Maybe it WAS Harry who said it! - Even if true, I don't see that some casual remarks about the likely features of an expected infant are so dreadful eg "Let's just hope s/he doesnt inherit granpa's schnozzle!" Thoughtless perhaps, but not the end of the world or monarchy. So tired of all this - and btw, what kind of a dud title is "Finding Freedom"? Freedom from what? Wealth? publicity? Entitlement? I suspect that this goes back to M's disappointment on having landed a Prince, but too late discovering that she was going to be a mere "Duchess" - which is a meaningless title to her dim US fans.
"Naming the racist": - any straightforward "revelation" would be such an anticlimax, maybe instead they will make it into a cliff-hanging board-game and market it through Archewell.
Grifters, blackmailing The Queen, but don't put it past her to finesse to their vicious game. How? By saying that SHE said those exact words, and then abdicating the throne after her Jubilee to which they aren't invited! NONONONONO. Don't invite them back in! THEY SAID IT! BAN THEM!
Dear God. These people actually went out and bought a copy of "The Bench"!
For God's sake, don't encourage them!
…the fact that they all need lawyers is very sad…..
Princess Anne was the royal in question.
This loathsome duo harkles r a nightmare. When they disrespect their family they disrespect themselves. Instead of trying to rise above their so called supposedly unfairness by RF by doing good works, setting good examples, they decided to take revenge by making unjustified allegations, now this is meghain's attacks/blackmail & harry the turncoat has no mind 9f his own it's been hijacked by his wife.
It's perfectly normal to ask a person going into an interracial marriage if they're prepared to deal with the child's skin colour! After all... it's the child who gets teased and bullied? It's not as easy as one thinks.
Despicable pair to do all this to the Queen , shame on them 🇦🇺🤮
About time The Queen do something about it
Most likely Harry !!!
When are these people going to go away…please stop talking about them…….
Every one speculates on what the unborn baby will inherit, eyes skin if mixed race hair will it inherit granddads nose etc perfectly normal,
Has no one noticed that as the remark was supposed to have been made to Harry , he was trying to say that it was ages ago, but was quickly shut up by Meg squeezing his hand and talking him down ,so I don’t think it was anything to do with Archie and just a general question to Harry about how he felt about the subject of color as he had been in trouble in the past for racist comments ! Subsequently Megan had made it something that had been said to her on several occasions ! A big change made in one interview !
Gob Bless The Queen! 🙏
Sick and tired of the Harkles when around the world we are having too many problems!!!!
Queen Elizabeth is admired and respected worldwide!
Harry shame on you!!!
Lady Colin Campbell said it was Princess Anne!!! Normal curiosity! Nothing racist about it. Let's be real, Rachel is hands on/controlling about everything. Of course, she gave Scooby-Doo information for the book. Thank goodness, the Queen is going to lawyer up to protect the family from the nefarious couple. Rachel is bold to think she can go up against the Queen.
It has been reported elsewhere that it was Harry who made that comment. Joking around one day when he had just started dating her, and not later when she was “pregnant”. No wonder #6 and his first wife won’t reveal the name.
Hearing Haz's version will now be seen as just a laugh at how far , under Meg's tutelage of "fake it til you make it", will go. Who did she study under?
If you listened to the interview, Harry said the comment was made before he married Meghan. I think it has been blown out of proportion. We wonder all sorts of things about what babies will look like. Will they have curly hair or straight, will they tan like Dad or burn like Mom, what color will their eyes be. It's ridiculous. I hope they don't get an invite to her Majesty's celebration. They don't deserve an invite.
Is it Scobie or Scabie,?
I am really tired of M & H ...all they seem to do is complain.
It`s only natural, to wonder who an unborn baby will take after. I am sure we have all said something along those lines. This is not imho a racist remark.
How can Scoby know, if M & H did not inform him. They wanted freedom, why they have too insult the famely and the firm?
Somehow, I don’t see Harry holding up well under cross examination if the RF sues. Their story has changed too much.
Thank goodness - H&M must be the most disliked and vile couple that the world has seen in decades. I'm so sorry for the Royal Family and particularly The Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William. The British forces have also faced astonishing betrayal by someone who made vows to them and The Queen. For H still to be whining about losing his honourary titles, despite walking away from his obligations and country (lets not forget the astonishing Disney debacle) is tone deaf and childishly petulant.
I heard it was harry himself who wondered what the child would look like.
This is a family built on colonialism and racism. Why did they not have a black person in their panel maybe people out there will understand what is racism or colonial tone
😂😂 Blackmail
Nothing funny about two 40 year olds crying they were cut off and blackmailing their own family. She has cut off both sides of her family. What does that say about her???
The lawyers told them not to name names ( so they can't be sued ), and now people guess who it was, even if it didn't happen.
KEEP good relations with HMTQ??? 🤣The “good relations” are well gone.
Media is giving them too much publicity. I don"t think many people care about them or the book. I am an American and hope the RF takes their titles and no longer considered part of the RF.
As HMTQ succinctly stated " some recollections may vary"! Any conversation or question about skin tone/complexion was natural curious. Bringing it up in the interview was thoroughly thought out and calculated to embarrass and discredit the RF.
This couple is full of it. Now they want an audience with the Queen. “Recollections May differ”. True black mail! William already said “We are NOT a racist family.
Interesting that we've not yet been shown pictures of baby 'Lilibet' !!
I would wonder if the little one might have a birth defect and that's why she has not been presented in public. I might be wrong, and hope that I am, it's just that Meg likes to be " top peg" and avoids betraying any sign of weakness. G Ire
Could it be because she has the looks of Doria? Lol
The new dolls not ready yet. Megsey keeps getting Botox and getting lighter skinned. Longer extensions. Looking like Octomom more every . unpleasant pic we get pushed in our faces
keep their kids private, I have no interest in them what so ever.
Meghan admitted that she had a hand in book. She admitted it when they sued the Newspaper that published her father’s letter.