#SmartPLS4

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @Alhamzah_F_Abbas
    @Alhamzah_F_Abbas 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you prof. Which one is better to calculate CMB, using SPSS or PLS?

  • @barkhaagarwal9469
    @barkhaagarwal9469 Год назад

    Sir what if there is a contradiction of result in case we conduct it by method 1 ( full collinearity) explained through this video and method 2 ( which is based on taking random variable in our model) ?
    .
    Also if you can bring a video on how to treat issues related to CMB ! It will be of great help!

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Год назад

      Report the results that show the CMB is not an issue. Hopefully i can upload a video soon

    • @MohdZaid-f3y
      @MohdZaid-f3y 4 дня назад

      Sir, we can run full model and then we can check inner vif values or we have to take random variables and then pointing all variables towards that random variable and then check inner vif

  • @Interactive_Research
    @Interactive_Research 3 месяца назад

    Is this enough for common method bias or we need to add random variable for this analysis?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  3 месяца назад

      CMB is enough

    • @Interactive_Research
      @Interactive_Research Месяц назад

      @@researchwithfawad How is it called the full collinarity approach? The dependent value's VIF score is still missing?

  • @syedandrabi489
    @syedandrabi489 9 месяцев назад +1

    How can we assess it in smart PLS 3?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  9 месяцев назад

      Same method. From PLS-SEM analysis check the VIF values.

    • @syedandrabi489
      @syedandrabi489 9 месяцев назад

      @@researchwithfawad how can we check vertical and lateral colinearity

  • @ZUBAIR-l6b
    @ZUBAIR-l6b Год назад

    BUT ACCORDING TO JAMES GASKIN, IF WE ADD A RANDOM VARIABLE THEN ONLY CMB CAN BE CHECHKED IN SMART PLS.

  • @AyurvedaMaroc
    @AyurvedaMaroc 8 месяцев назад

    hello, please your model is reflective which is good to run the standard or the and the consistent PLS SEM algorithm. knowing that in my data results are different for example Rsquare is higher in consistent and NFI is n/a? what should i choose please?

  • @asharwyne6872
    @asharwyne6872 Год назад

    Sir Fawad, if more than 3.3 how to treat them?

    • @researchwithfawad
      @researchwithfawad  Год назад +1

      You can add Control Variables, make sure data is collected from multiple sources, you may also transform the data.

    • @matsersilvaworld5224
      @matsersilvaworld5224 3 месяца назад

      @@researchwithfawad Dear Prof, do you have a video for this?