Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Should We Stop Snow White Going Woke? Movie Remake Debate | Good Morning Britain
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 авг 2024
- Next year we're expecting to see Disney's latest live-action remake of one of their classic films 'Snow White'
Rachel Zegler who is set to play the new princess has recently slammed the original movie for its outdated messages and even calls the prince a stalker. This comes amongst claims that the new film will be updated for modern audiences.
Broadcast on 17/08/23
Stream Good Morning Britain live, every weekday from 6am on the ITV Hub 📲 daytimelink.itv...
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1NbomQa
Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!
The Good Morning Britain RUclips channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.
Join Susanna Reid, Ben Shephard, Kate Garraway, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am until 9 every weekday!
ITV Hub: daytimelink.itv...
Website: bit.ly/1GsZuha
RUclips: bit.ly/1Ecy0g1
Facebook: on. 1HEDRMb
Twitter: bit.ly/1xdLqU3
www.itv.com
#GMB #snowwhite #rachelzegler
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (feat. Yuki Chiba) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OdxSbc0ap-s/mqdefault.jpg)
Snow White in the original wasn't sleeping she was in a 'sleeping death'.The kiss from the Prince brought her back to life.
Actually in the original, which is the 1812 grimm story, she was woken by a guard opening the casket and punching snow white (who was 7 years old) lifeless corpse knocking the apple loose and waking her, true loves first kiss didnt exist until disneys 1937 adaptation
@@SurvivalScottdon't point out facts, gammons can't handle the truth.
@@SurvivalScottThey clearly mean the original Disney version, why be so facetious
@@SurvivalScott The Grimm version isn't relevant to this situation.
@@randomuser4201 are you white? Cause if you are why the hell are you insulting your own ethnic group?
The girl in the rubbish remake of a fantastic fairy tale is so self absorbed, to say the prince is a stalker shows just how unintelligent she really is.
Oh fah sure, every child in the world is anxiously awaiting a movie in which Snow "Almost" White become a Mary Sue, don't-need-no-man, grrlll boss CEO.....oh, fah sure.
Never rewrite the history. Everything that has happened in the history should never be forgotten.
Disney is rewriting history for profit, so this is what they get for karma, their own lead actress trashing Disney's brand and image.
@@giyanvice totally agree
@@hellogoodbye4061 agree
Amen to that never mind the fact that she’s a narcissist, and it shows every time she runs her mouth.
Snow White was not asleep she was found by the Prince in a glass coffin. For all intense and purposes he thought she was dead, so it was a kiss goodbye. Totally absurd to bring the issue of consent into it. It is also clear from her reaction when she woke up that she fully consented.
Never rewrite the history. Everything that has happened in the history should never be forgotten.
Disney is rewriting history for profit, so this is what they get for karma, their own lead actress trashing Disney's brand and image.
I agree that we shouldn’t bring consent into it but we should acknowledge that she can’t consent to a kiss when she’s dead . Even if she liked it, that’s not consent
@@haleemahkhan61 - She is dead!!! The kiss was made out of grief. Anyone who does not understand what is going on here is the one with the problem not the actual scene. Context is everything and it is okay to have an emotional reaction on the death of a loved one .
Here is an other example, someone requiring CPR is also not able to give consent, so do we just leave them to their fate? This would be the logical conclusion to any argument of consent.
It is the people that sexualise every human interaction that are the ones with the real problem here. We are dealing with a fantasy cartoon and the kiss occured after the Prince discovered her in a glass coffin. It is spelled out quite clearly what is going on.
Also if she likes it that is evidence of consent!!! On seeing him she goes to cuddle him.
In normal relationships you do not ask for verbal consent before every interaction. There are other levels of understanding that have taken place in order for us to to know that our partner gives us consent to kiss or cuddle them.
@@mackerel129 no I actually get u more now and I agree. Although she didn't consent (its not really relevant), I agree that consent isn't needed as like u said this was out of grief and kiss as an expression of his love and emotion. I mean like u said cpr doesn't require consent (although in hospital settings you have DNR)
However liking something doesn't mean consent. Consent is permission. Its like if I didn't want to watch a film but mh friend begged me to go (or forced me). I end up living the film, but I didn't "consent" to wanting to watch it. This isn't relevant to snow White necessarily but often times with rape victims the people that did it to them often say things like they liked to minimise their pain and silence the victim. But that doesn't mean they consented to it because they were violated against their will.
@@haleemahkhan61 - But her behaviour did indicate she consented. She opened her arms to him to draw him closer to her.
In normal relationships, we do not ask our partner if it is okay to kiss them or put our arm around them every time. To promote the idea that verbal consent must happen every time there is a desire for physical interaction is not conducive to a healthy relationship. Relationships are built on trust and there are many levels of communication in relationships. (Ahem) Sometimes that communication comes in the form of kisses to indicate to the other partner the desire to do other things- the other partner either reciprocates or puts cold water on the moment.
Go woke, go broke.
Has nobody learned from Bud Light?
A kiss from a creep won't break the spell....it's true LOVES kiss that breaks the spell
If you want to make the kiss relatable to current society, the prince can kiss snow white, but snow white will wake up furious or the dwarves would be furious watching it happen that snow white was not asked before being kissed. They would try to sue the prince or tell everyone in the kingdom through pigeon and snail mail until the prince is either no longer a prince or not allowed to be outside his castle anymore. It would be a reflection of how our society reacts nowadays.
Rachel Zeigler does have a big adamsapple in his neck! Where's an apple, there's always a banana too!😅
No princess that gets kissed is asleep in the disney films they were technically dead and also they were kissed by people they knew in order for them to live. My problem is if tou want to change someone from an original work just make something new inspired by it. There's been live action snow whites before that change things and they're not remakes they're something new.
Snow White and the huntsman being one of them
These morons know this. They would change their opinions about "sexual assault" in a heartbeat if they were diagnosed with a heart condition but the doctors told them they would not be eligible for CPR in the event of a heart attack since it involves mouth to mouth 😂😂
Am I missing something here? Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Snow White essentially “stalked” by the evil Queen and when the Prince showed up at the end to kiss her, she was dead. She wasn’t sleep. It was technically her funeral and he showed up to pay his respects. Lots of people kiss the deceased when they say goodbye. Why kill the fairytales and magic for children? The world is already crazy enough as it is. Let’s at least give them some since of happiness in the tv and movies they watch
You are correct, it is a tradition of many religions including many sects of Christianity. However, even if the producer knows about it she isn't concerned with it. All you need to do is watch interviews with her and you'll see she's only concerned about pushing the petty politics that feminism is currently known for.
Yeah. The sadistic and highly jealous egomaniac female who poisons SW. Yet the Prince whose beings her back to life with a simple kiss is the problem 🤔.
Snow White was a child and the evil queen treated her like dirt and then posioned her. So child abuse and murder is perfectly fine but falling in love is bad?
Never rewrite the history. Everything that has happened in the history should never be forgotten.
Disney is rewriting history for profit, so this is what they get for karma, their own lead actress trashing Disney's brand and image.
Remember this is Hollywood, they have no morality.
Very sad ! The changing of the attitude of women's relationship to men. We are creating a hostile mindset in females towards men.
It is very sad.
In the original tale, the glass coffin is accidentally dropped when they carry her back to the castle and the piece of poison apple flies out of her mouth, waking her. They could have just replaced Disney's kiss scene by honouring the original fairy tale and adding comedic relief. There's modifying an old story for a modern audience, and then there's taking everything to an extreme to pander to an ideal that doesn't even exist in our current culture, and doing it in a way that is surface-level, hypocritical, and contradictory.
woke - brainworms
Dreadful - they ditched the dwarves and made the prince an extra - this is not the story of snow white! The core elements of the classic tale have been removed to the point the story is unrecognisable so why on earth did they stick with the title? The core elements were: pure, kind girl , becomes the object of jealous stepmothers envy.... girl lives in hiding with dwarves and warms their hearts with her kindness, making the place more of a home. She eats a poison apple which puts her into a magical death, until her true love kisses her. And you can probably bypass the worrisome rapey tone of that simply by putting in a scene where she and the prince already know eachother and are betrothed/inlove/ destined to be together - because as somebody who experienced grief trust me kissing your dead loved one isn't creepy. The point of this story was that the prince was destined for snow white. It is romantic. It illustrates how love can heal and save us. There is more to life than battle and ambition. We have plenty of warrior princesses but who wanted to change snow white into that??? If romance isn't for you pick a different fairytale. If disney wanted to get all woke they should have just cast the prince as a woman, not made love and nurture irrelevant. I feel like all the disney princesses are cookie cutter copies of the same feminine ideal. Woman are strong! Women can achieve! blah blah blah, it's so boring. Nurture, kindness, compassion to animals - these things are all valid. I don;t see these values at all in disney. Why are we writing men out entirely? Nobody is an island. If you're writing prince charming out to show love is diverse then cast the first female/ female romance because it helps children with non-nuclear families to have representation somewhere, but this is just pointless rubbish - woke for the sake of it. My children will never be watching this rubish!
And you know the fun part? When you voice out this opinion, you’re branded as some evil, right-wing lunatic trying to resurrect the Stone Age.
@@poetjla7778 well sure there are some far right folks involving themselves - especially with this being snow white the girl famed for the skin white as snow, but aside from the Grimm fairytales poetry of description her appearance plays very little role in the story itself . So I am sympathetic to the fact that there may be people who are being less than fair to the new version because they are seeing it through a bigotted lens. I feel like in every generation it's really important all little girls can find a Diney princess that they feel looks a bit like and represents them. And on that topic I'm quite torn because I knew super pale girls who got teased, but overall I just don't care which princess is which shade as long as in every generation every little girl has somebody to say she's beautiful and kinda like me. Now I have't read the grimm story but I always understood that the idea was that she was called snow white and that reference was also about her internal beauty/ purity. So whilst you can change the non important aspects of narrative i.e, appearance, if you take away snow whites qualities of personality then you are simply dealing with a different character entirely. I think the worst thing about the Disney trend is that whilst it seems to earn points for showing us diversity it really is a very shallow/ surface level of diversity. There catalogue of new films it seems as though they're only showing us the same personality over and over again. If they had kept snow white as the gentle classical beauty who is about kindness and made her black this would have been a contribution and may have contributed more - because little girls want to feel pretty. And if you studied sociology of little girls that grew up with barbie dolls there are some heartbreaking experiments that show minorities didn't feel as beautiful / "good". My problem with this vapid modernisation from what I have seen is that instead of trying to do good it tries only to avoid offending and "look inclusive" which is not the same as being good or genuine recognition of diversity and inclusion. So many opportunities were missed here. Obviously I can see problems of a live action with dwarves that are entirel 1 dimensional and named dopey or sneezy but these aspects could have been changed . I think the word dopey could get used as a playground slur but a busy dwarf, a bouncy dwarf , all with fully fleshed out personalities - it could have been wonderful. They could have been really brave and created something amazing by dealing with the tricky issues, but this is just so weak , instead they gave up . I feel like they cut out the meat of this narrative to replace it with hot air about being modern and inclusive, it's a stale re-hash. In the coming years so many children will be birn into families with 2 mummies or 2 Daddies, if they wanted to contribute something why not actually do that. It could have been a modern love story if they really needed to hit these diversity targets. But love will never be out of date. They literally only subtracted rather than added anything. The real issue here is that diversity should mean the disney princesses are diverse, some want love, some are tomboys, some have internal demons and need to gain confidence, some are looking for family or friendship. It isn't right wing to say stop erasing some females from the narrative entirely because they are about sweetness and kindness. Gentle women should not be crushed out simply because they're not the loudest.
@@poetjla7778 It's not ''evil'', but it's utterly entitled and toxic. Don't like it? Don't watch it...
@@CucumberCheese How is it toxic? Because it's not what you like to hear? Regardless there's always going to be opinions like this and rather marking them as toxic, take the time to understand where the other side of the isle is coming from.
@@poetjla7778 I know exactly where the other side is coming from, and there are significantly more important things going on in the world. The actress had an opinion, that she is entitled to. Attacking her, and wanting her removed from the production, is the definition of toxic. Labelling everything as ''woke'' is a toxic mentality. There's significant nuance that is missed by those who shout ''woke'' at everything.
They took the love out of a classic love story lol
What do you mean “should we stop it”? How exactly are we supposed to stop it.
Disney are apparently canning it anyway after the backlash
By not watching it. Disney only listen when they're making a loss.
Keep up the pressure folks until they fold, keep most heat on Blackrock/ vanguard and ESG (true villains of story)
The actress is playing Mud Brown, not Snow White
The more they crank the woke machine, the quicker their empire will fall. Keep it going, keep cranking.
The original 'Snow White' was a cartoon the Prince wasn't a real person How is this original Prince a 'stalker'. Disney are woke.
I agree on what Jill St John who was in James Bond film Diamonds Are Forever 1971 said if these actors or actress are not happy with there parts then they shouldn't of accepted the roles the they where given simple as.
Fairly tales can change, just write new ones. Why make originals even worse? Remakes are for correcting problems in the original. The original was a great classic film, no need to say it was wrong
Should stop GMB
this time the mirror will say the queen is the fairest of them all
"2023" has no morals.
This film will bomb. To much woke from Disney trying to satisfy the minority over the majority.
It had nothing to do with consent. She was in a sleeping death, and the only way to save her was loves first kiss.
They immediately were smitten with each other, the love was there both sides, if he was the one asleep I would expect Snow to do the same kiss to save him.
It’s laughable how stupid the people who approve of these changes are. They don’t even get their facts right.
If you disagree with the woke morals DIsney is pushing onto us, boycott Disney products and take your money elsewhere. Movies are first and foremost a business, and ultimately, the market decides what gets greenlit; it's as simple as that. Personally I hope the movie flops spectacularly but if their other live-action remakes are anything to go by, it will probably recoup its budget and then some
Never rewrite the history. Everything that has happened in the history should never be forgotten.
Disney is rewriting history for profit, so this is what they get for karma, their own lead actress trashing Disney's brand and image.
Disney absolutely empowered her to say all those disrespectful, disgusting things about the Walt Disney classic Snow White. I can absolutely see over table reads how the writers and director told Zegler and Gadot their vision of this disastrous remake. I’m sure it didn’t take much for those woke liberal leftist (Zegler and Gadot) to take the ball and run with it.
Our Family will never pay to see this disaster and will not even watch it for free.
Walt Disney and the creators of Snow White are not even alive to defend themselves which makes it even more disrespectful and disgusting that Zegler and Gadot would say the things they said about original. The writers, director, and producers are equally as guilty.
Boycott Rachel Zegler
Look at both woman the woke one looks so upset and holding back her triggers and the other lady is just down to earth
Why can't Snow white have met Prince charming before Evil witch stole the throne, so kissing her in the end of the movies not so creepy...this woke remake so far is a load of rubbish
Yes they could have a long history and fall in love before she bites the apple: just a slight modification to the story so that it makes more sense, like they successfully did with prince charming in the Cinderella remake. That would also make kissing her in the coffin more emotional as he could be saying goodbye thinking he's lost her forever.
@@4eva123 I agree, it's really a problem solved if they do it like that
Oh, look, three feminists agreeing with each other that this horrid "reimagining" is just fine. Who'd a thunk?
Worlds gone mad
It's nothing to do with treating people with respect when do the wokey's ever treat anyone with respect it's always about getting their own way with them
Huge glaring error during this debate - they keep saying Prince Charming kissing a sleeping woman is problematic.
But she's not sleeping, she's effectively in a coma. And it is clearly stated in the original movie that the only thing that can bring her out of that coma is true love's kiss.
So the kiss has magical properties. If a man kissing a woman is a problem is 2023 the human race is absolutely doomed.
not even the original movie by the way, disneys 1937 animated movie was a rip off from the 1926 black and white movie from the 1912 broadway play, disney stole the entire story and changed the names of the dwarfs and thats it, disney is a fraud
Lets see how these same women react if the British and American Medical Associations announce that women are no longer eligible for CPR treatment due to the mouth to mouth part unless they sign a stack of forms. Would they say that the doctors are now respecting women's boundaries or will they call them murderers? 😂😂
@@TDKiller415 mouth to mouth is no longer part of CPR and hasnt been for over a decade
@@SurvivalScott Thats absolute bullshit and you know it. The mouth to mouth is called "rescue breaths", and its the pulmonary part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. I know this because around 3 years ago a customer had a heart attack in the restaurant where I work and two other customers did CPR on him with chest compressions and rescue breaths until the paramedics arrived to take him to the hospital, and as far as I saw that night, the staff and other customers hailed those two as heroes, not rapists.
Go crawl back under your rock and don't come back out, woke jackass.
I don't think any literature should be adapted, no matter how unpleasant it is. It should be kept in the original form. Make new stories if you want to be "relevant", "diverse" or "modern".
"Go Woke, Go Broke" - This will be resounded with every drop in their revenue.
didnt barbie beat oppenheimer in the box office?
I think "Make bad film, go broke" is more appropriate.
@@pinkaltercation How about “Divert From Source Material and get wrecked”?
@@poetjla7778 the original Disney snow (1937) diverted from the source material too.
Again, “make bad film, go broke”.
Even that doesn’t seem right considering avengers makes so much money, but oh well.
@@pinkaltercation This version overly brims with girl boss energy and claims to be a representation of what all women could be (which is something not all women can relate to). If you redo this stuff portraying female characters as flawless with shallow to no growth, how do you expect the audience to learn from that? Then when it gets criticized they go for their grandest cop-out: Calling the fans misogynistic. Like many people have said, if you hate the story so much then go make your own.
@@poetjla7778 Agreed. I think "girl boss energy" is fine, just make a new film, do it well, and no one will complain.
Snow Woke will be a disaster for Disney.
Disney is mess they've pissed off most of their fans and people have had enough of this nonsense.the box office has been terrible for Disney nobody wants to watch their crappy movie's
Lets all just not watch the movie. And when the movie is released in theatres ( which I HOPE NOT ), lets all sit right in front of the cinemas showcasing the Snow White remake, and collectively watch the 1937 Snow White MASTERPIECE.
So it was creepy when my wife was in a coma and i kissed her, got it.
It’s not creepy, true love first kissed, can break the cursed that’s good woah I believe in fairytale magical 🥹🤩
Oh fah sure, every child in the world is anxiously awaiting a movie in which Snow "Almost" White become a Mary Sue, don't-need-no-man, grrlll boss CEO.....oh, fah sure.
Skin colour is irrelevant
I do agree that Rachel Zegler came across as very arrogant in those recent interviews.
I want to see a remake of Malcom X and this time he is white.
hollywood is learning the hard way for going woke
I watched their live action remakes up until Beauty and the Beast, since then they've just gotten worse and has become more about ticking boxes than anything else but this will flop just like so many of their recent releases have. Walt Disney will be turning in his grave with what they're doing to his legacy.
Never rewrite the history. Everything that has happened in the history should never be forgotten.
Disney is rewriting history for profit, so this is what they get for karma, their own lead actress trashing Disney's brand and image.
Well all I can say is I have mild Asperger’s and a lot of the time over my 40 plus years and in the present day I have not always been treated the same. Yes we should all be treated the same no mate what skin colour we are or what sex we are or if we have a mild learning disability or if we are trans. But that should not mean rewriting history just to cos some woke people say so. Yes it’s ok to modernise fairytales but to think people might be offended as the reason to change things is silly. Best thing to do is if you think you might feel offended by a film or play or book or tv show then do not either read it or watch it. Simple as that.
Fairytale are not feel life
You should not get worked up about fiction when there are much worse things to worry about and talk about.
they should have called this movie and its characters somethingother than snow white and there would be no problem. People have enough to depress them. Going after our childhood memories is just another blow from a tone deaf minority at the top of western society. Boycott Disney till they start listening to their fans again rather than smugly looking down on us and cancelling anyone that calls them out
They won't make much $ no one is interested 😂
I dislike this video cause you can clearly see favouritism towards the woke lady.
She was given more talk time, they even interrupted other lady response, they were more agreeable with woke points and more defensive towards counter arguments, overall news presenters were not neutral
The original brothers grimm story was just called schneewittchen, it didnt include the dwarfs in the title (and there were not 7, the amount was unspecified and they didnt have names or sing songs), and although the literal translation of schneewittchen is snow white, the german meaning of it is "a woman or girl with black or dark brown hair with pale skin", now rachel zegler is a black hair, pale latina, so she fits the title.
Plus Disney already changed it back in 1937, what you people call the original or classics were disneys first adaptation, if you really want to go back to the original 1812 brothers grimm version i can tell you the story right now but its not nice.
So you have a woman who cuts her finger, blood falls on the floor onto the snow, she says she wants a child who is pale as snow (not white as snow as the 1857 one says) lips as red as blood, hair as dark as coal and eyes as green as the forest.
She then has a daughter called snow white (now notice i said has a daughter, because in the very original it was her real mother not her step mother) as snow white grows up and becomes 7 years old the mother gets jealous that her magic mirror thinks snow white is more beautiful, so she sends snow white into the forest and then tells the huntsman to kill her and bring back the lungs and liver of her own 7 year old daughter so she can eat them to absorb her beauty, the huntsman having a heart didnt kill her and instead took back animal lungs and liver, eventually the mother found out snow white was still alive and was out living with the dwarfs where the huntsman had left her for safety, so the mother poisons half of an apple and takes it to snow white as a gift to apologise, to trick snow white into biting the apple the mother bites it herself but on half thats not poisoned, snow white takes a bite of the apple and drops down dead, the dwarfs then encase her in a glass coffin where later a prince would arrive and fall in love with a 7 year olds lifeless corpse, he then begs the dwarfs to let him take her, eventually they do, so they take snow white back to the castle (in the 1857 version this is where she wakes up after a guard drops the coffin and the apple chunk falls out her mouth and she wakes but not in the 1812 version) the prince not being able to be away from her at all has the guards carry the coffin from room to room to be with him, a guard eventually gets so fed up doing this he opens the coffin and punches the 7 year olds lifeless corpse and knocks the apple from her gullet causing her to wake, the prince and 7 year old snow white then get married (yes paedophilia was happening), at the wedding snow whites mother turns up and after the prince realises what happend he forces the mother to wear red hot iron shoes and dance in them until she drops dead, then the prince and his underage bride live happily ever after.
So do you really want a violent, paedophile freak show story made or are you actually okay with changing the story to make it more inclusive to all?
Plus lets not forget disney dont own it, its public domain so any one of you people who complain about it can go make your own, but remember to stick to the story i just told you otherwise you will be doing exactly what disney are doing.
"more inclusive for all", if you can't enjoy a show, film, game, book, comic, etc unless it has people who look like you, you're pathetic.
I never once thought when watching Moana with my nephews "I can't enjoy this, I'm not Polynesian. It obviously wasn't made for me".
Yet, according to lefties, it's important to change European folklore and heritage to "make it more inclusive". Are your opinions of minorities so low? Do you really think them so petty and shallow, they can only relate to people who look like them? You sound pretty prejudiced to me.
Then Disney shouldn't call it a "remake of the 1937 film" 🙄 They may as well call it their second adaptation of the Brothers Grimm fairy tale, not a remake of the 1937 film, because its too different
@@TDKiller415 disney never said it was a remake, that was a false report by variety magazine, disney simply said they are making a live action snow white and then later added a reimagining of snow white
@@SurvivalScott Its officially listed as a "live action remake of 1937's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs".
Nice try though 👍🏻 You can defend this garbage all you like, all you do is make a fool of yourself. If this was a separate adaptation of the original fairy tale, Disney would've said so, they wouldn't keep saying "remake" or "re-imagining" of the 1937 film.
I am against this new adaptation.
Not because it's got a latina playing Snow White like so many like to complain. Not because of the changes. In fact I'm actually a supporter of updating old fairy tales and giving a different interpretation in general.
I'm against it because it's DISNEY doing it.
They've done remake after remake and they're mostly soulless.
Loads loved the little mermaid remake recently. And whilst it wasn't a bad film, it was the same story with shallow changes plodded here and there. And I don't mean same story as in the little mermaid's story. I mean the same as the 1989 version.
One such change that loads like to point out, is people praising Ariel and her sisters being ethnically diverse and representing the oceans of the worlds by being their respective rulers. This includes Ariel. Yet, we don't see Ariel perform any leadership duties in her ocean. She goes through the same story beats as the original. So making her a ruler was utterly pointless in that regard.
Updating/remaking a film means nothing if you don't try and make it a good story first and foremost.
I would've been more supportive of this new adaptation had it been started 10 years earlier.
But I won't see it because I refuse to support these lifeless remakes.
I was very much on the side of don't mess with the original, but the lady who was arguing in favour of the remake was well articulated and made some good points!
I second this. This was the first time I started to see some logics and well-built arguments from the other side
Same here, she had made good points.
she just needs a good shagging to get her back on track.
Why do people care if an OLD story is updated to match the preferences of the creators involved? Nowadays we have this ridiculous movement that believes original stories are ''untouchable'', but this just isn't backed up by anything. EVERY story and EVERY piece of art can be adapted, changed, updated. So long as the original remains accessible and intact, WHAT is the issue?
Sure, some hardcore OG Disney Snow White fans might be saddened that the remake is different, but this is surely 0.001% of the population. The others who dislike the changes can simply opt out of watching and abstain from this entitled and self-righteous criticism. A mindset that spreads like wild fire among the internet's toxic and conformist users.
Alright they are classic because they are timeless if clasics can be "updated" lets see the Renoir or the Rembrandt the van Gogh updates
@@maxwellgeary9632 Your comparison fails on several fronts. Paintings like Renoir, Rembrandt, and van Gogh are static, standalone works of art. Their essence lies in their original form, frozen in time. There would be no reason to update these. Storytelling, however, particularly in cinema, relies on ever changing technology and is a more dynamic process.
Stories can and should be adapted to reflect our changing world, all while respecting the essence that made them classics in the first place. Whilst also keeping the originals untouched and accessible. It's pretty harmless and incredibly simple to understand.
@@CucumberCheese You say paintings can't be updated as they are static stand alone works Snow White is a static stand alone work as well. It was written at a specific time and place making specific comment and instruction on then applicable Social and Societal Mores and behaviour. Your so called remake is simply a completely new Narrative that has Plagiarized the name for commercial gain. It should more accurately be called" Entitled Brat and the Seven Social Sycophants "
@@maxwellgeary9632 Your comparison, again, does not work. Snow White, as a story, has already seen numerous adaptations over the years. Unlike a painting, which remains a fixed (or static) visual representation, a story is inherently more abstract and open to reinterpretation. There's no reason why it can't be revisited.
Google what ''adaptation'' means, and you'll realise how flawed your comparison is. It has already undergone various transformations, each adapting it to their respective era and technological advancements.
The only entitled brat here, is you. Your dismissal of modern adaptations as mere plagiarism reeks of entitlement. It implies that the creators of adaptations are not entitled to reinterpret, reimagine, or build upon existing stories, even when they do so with creative and artistic intentions, and have the relevant permission.
Don't like it? Don't watch it. Move on, you've lost this one.
🎻🎻🎻🎻🎻 stop complaining, it’s not real, it doesn’t matter, move on and grow up
If it doesnt matter. Why change it?
translated: LALALALA stop resisting LALALALA just accept it
Laura's response is quite frankly, very disappointing