Americans Can't Lose Hope Around Gun Control - Between the Scenes | The Daily Show
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июн 2024
- Why does America's optimism fly out the window during conversations about gun control? Trevor Noah unpacks America's apathy around gun regulation and urges people to not lose hope in this #BetweentheScenes. #TDSThrowback #DailyShow
Subscribe to The Daily Show:
/ @thedailyshow
Follow The Daily Show:
Twitter: / thedailyshow
Facebook: / thedailyshow
Instagram: / thedailyshow
Stream full episodes of The Daily Show on Paramount+: www.paramountplus.com/?ftag=PP...
Follow Comedy Central:
Twitter: / comedycentral
Facebook: / comedycentral
Instagram: / comedycentral
Watch full episodes of The Daily Show: www.cc.com/shows/the-daily-show
About The Daily Show:
For over twenty-five years, the groundbreaking, Emmy and Peabody award-winning The Daily Show has entertained audiences each night with hilarious, provocative and insightful satire about our society that helps make sense of the world. The Daily Show redefined the late night show category on TV and, with an audience of over 44M across social media platforms, has become a launching pad for some of the biggest stars in entertainment.
This next chapter of this iconic franchise showcases its diverse news team of correspondents and contributors, including Ronny Chieng, Michael Kosta, Desi Lydic, Dulcé Sloan, Roy Wood Jr., Lewis Black and Jordan Klepper, comedy greats as guests hosts, and interviews with influential and emerging voices from across society.
The Daily Show airs weeknights at 11/10c on Comedy Central. 
Приколы
Bless Trevor Noah for his big picture observations, intellect, and morality.
Don't forget anti-american and tyrannical ignorance
Idiotic more like it
😂😂😂
We miss you Trevor. You were a breathe of fresh, real air in the news cycle
How? He is literally another cnn trash?
Yeah
...who repeats the exact same thing every other news station does.
@@mobilusinmobili8321 except with other news stations there aren't any jokes, or breakdowns of complicated issues. The Daily Show used to be my favorite way to stay up to speed with current events but it's just not the same anymore
No he wasn’t
This is why I miss Trevor having a wider reach with a show rather than when he's touring. His ability to see a better, simpler way and communicate it clearly is sorely needed in this world.
Especially in his echo chamber. Everyone is smart in an echo chamber
Agreed. This is where he is needed
@@stephansteohanlarsen7457 we will never forget his amazing jokes. Like that 2948266288558372 times he did trump voice. Which is so original as we all know. Or him stealing jokes from Twitter.
@@MagicBus-ct7fewhy tf are you even here?
Are you missing him too?
nah i disagree. people like trevor noah are not needed. we don’t appreciate people like trevor noah in the world. we will always dismiss everything he says as if he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
happens all the time. we would rather listen to people who lie to us. but the person giving us the truth we turn him into the enemy.
People have proven they can’t be trusted with guns and it’s mainly because humans have emotions. Sometimes people make mistakes when they can’t control their emotions. If you don’t believe me, how do you think road rage happens?
Ok . I'm fine with doing what you fascists want. Let's ban guns. But government people should give them too. So for example. The white house guards and the FBI agents and CIA asshols won't have guns.
@@MagicBus-ct7fe These folks love police brutality and cops strong-arming innocent folk. They love the idea of cops killing Americans. Of course they want them armed.
And yet it’s really really hard for others to understand this simple and yet incredibly important logical reasoning… we have too many brainwashed dunces in the country.
We also have too many GOP, who are only interested in $bribes$ from the NRA
man you said it. it’s obvious these people don’t care.
Thank you Trevor
Too bad we have to leave it to a comedian to come up with these logical points.
Our politicians seem to cower when faced with the monumental decisions.
I'm dying of old age watching nothing change.
The way he put it made me think in a way I have never thought of before. Bless you Trevor, we miss you!
HOW IS SOMEONE SO YOUNG BE SO WISE?
He grew up in a society where his very existence was a crime. You learn from that or you stay trapped. He's smart and wise.
Trevor is quite dim
Amen. You hit the nail on the head🙏❤️
Thank you TDS, I really needed that end message ❤
Love the gym analogy
Ok that’s a brilliant observation.
In an echo chamber
"You have to keep bothering."
Why did MLK jr bother. .. ❤ Trevor and how he thinks and speaks.
Don’t ever compare the two! It’s disrespectful and shows your knowledge on who he was! Towards the end of his life MLK had a shift in beliefs and was ready to March on Washington with arms which is why he was killed!
MLK Jr fought for civil rights. Trevor Noah is doing the opposite. The 2nd amendment is a civil right, and he just spent 5 minutes fighting to restrict it
Whats ironic is MLK was denied a gun permit as he was trying to get one due to his increased publicity. He was denied for reasons. Because whether you agree or not, gun control is rooted in racism and is historically racist. Which is weird considering the party who loves gun control is "anti racist" and everything to them is racist.
Being reactive to problems has become the preference in US governments and corporations. Reactive approaches ultimately prove to be unnecessarily costly; costs that are passed on to taxpayers and consumers.
We are only optimistic when it is a bipartisan issue. Together we stand. Divided we fall.
How register all the weapons already in illegal circulation?
He's got the intelligence and insight to run that country. Such a shame in some ways that he wasn't born there.
He is also not a citizen
@@arion9696 To be president, one must be born a citizen, not just become one. But that's interesting. Thanks. 🙂
Oh I miss Trevor ! I did not know that you could miss some one you never knew !
I dont know that would solve anything but definitely should be trying something. I also think its important to not get political about this. I know its a debate spot but like this effects everybody negatively and is sad.
Gotta look for solutions that will fly. Sure taking everybodys yea.. might help but thats not gonna happen.
Gotta find compromise solutions to try i think.
I have always felt i have a better chance of running from a knife than a gun.
If someone has a knife or gun..... wouldn’t you want one for yourself or maybe a law abiding citizen sees someone attacking you.... and maybe idk.... shoots the attacker???
@@Megatron_James_Brady8121I understand your logic. However we have to address the elephant in the room. Many gun deaths (I don’t have a metric available) are domestic and are the result of someone living in the home discharging the household firearm into another occupant or themselves purposefully and accidentally. However I also feel that most of our gun violence is related to poor mental health services here in the states.
@heroichitsuji great, so you're up for paying for mental health in this country. How about the red flag laws that take guns away from abusers.
@@Megatron_James_Brady8121 how about ban weapons, u'll probably get attacked with a pocket knife, just run or whip out ur own pocket knife. You don't have to worry about getting attacked with a weapon if nobody has a weapon!
@@kreiner1 in my country we don't need firearms to be taken away from abusers because nobody has access to firearms. Yeah sure they'll just beat or stab someone but 1. Better chance of survival 2. I've never heard of a kid from my country accidentally shooting themselves or others
Audience shot at 2:15 says everything you need to know about the suckling sheep that eat this garbage up
Right on the money ❤
Should be shown in Congress. In schools. In churches, everywhere. Whats the date of this?
A way forward in gun control occurred to me. It's thinking outside the box and isn't a silver bullet, so to speak, but we could pass a law that requires gun owners, before a 1 or 2 year grace period expires, to take their firearms (or just stocks vis-a-vis rifles) down to their nearest trophy shop and get their names inscribed on their guns. In big, fancy heirloom font or tiny micro-script. This will increase the chances of lost/stolen guns getting repatriated and will make tracking guns involved in crimes faster and easier than a serial number through a vitiated ATF. And no possessor of a stolen gun is going to want to tag it, so hot guns will get even hotter. And if anyone is found with a gun not bearing their name and/or one that tracks back through the serial # to a gun reported stolen, questions will be asked. Maybe by a judge.
😂 This is one of the goofiest ideas I've seen in a while.
Lol, you really are clueless bud.
I live in a gun free country so I believe in gun control, but also that is such a naive idea that just won’t work in the slightest.
Um.
Aren’t guns modular in nature?
No
Make full-auto legal again!
Gun owners suggesting new gun regulations? hahahahahhahahahaha
If you listen to give up everything and weapons then your dead
Yet somehow countries where people aren't armed to the teeth have less deaths per capita due to crime.
Grandpa did you take your meds yet?
I have never heard anyone who shoots at the range and suggests weapons bans.....
Its because YOUR GUN LOBBY IS CRAZY RICH. That's it.
Nuh America doesn't have a gun control problem
Sigh. I love his mind. I wish more people could find their common sense and use it to bring ppl together, like he has.
He’s racist, don’t follow him
😂😂😂
Thoughts and prayers
If only the rest were as intelligent in their thinking, we may just break ground, but we all know people are ignorantAF in this country.
That speech about hope was beautiful
sheep.
have you ever shot a gun? have you ever been in a situation where you needed a gun? are you even american?
Brilliant man
Hardly. Another blowhard celebrity clueless on any sort of logic or factual statistics.
This is nothing but corporate/ state propaganda.
Died of old age 😂
There are ~100 nations that has better gun laws then the US and almost off nations have less gun violence. But here the problem kicks in - if they can solve it, and the US can't, what does this make the US? Inferior in political decision making? Inferior in societys stress management?
It would question a lot of basic belives the US has held for a very long time, and a sudden wake up - if even possible - would leave teh most people in a pretty dark and uncomftable situation. So maybe from this point it is better to hope your own kids didn't get shot and accept the others as normal casualties of just how the world works ... for some rason.
I'd say it's access to illegal guns. More illegal guns require more legal guns to counteract. If you got rid of illegal guns, legal gun usage would plummet. It's a problem very similar to drug trade, and making more laws isn't gonna solve it.
@@arcturus4762 That would break a very complex situation down to one external source of trouble - what in itself is pretty unrealistic.
The number of leagl guns by definition give us the setting of how easy it is that some fall through the grid and become illegal guns. When every grandfather who went to cemetry for age leaves a box with guns no one can track, than you - by definition - have alot of them.
If anyone can carry a gun, no one sticks out by having an illegal one.
If every shop owner has a gun under his desk, every robber need a similar or bigger gun.
If you#re allowed to have a machinegun for fun shooting at the range, every bank robber is in theory also able to get ther hands on a military grade gun, and police responsind has to bring even bigger guns.
Police running around like in marines Falludscha not spark much trust of citizens in ther personal safety and tend to get more guns themself.
Adding that this overly militarised police then have a similar standing to citizenz than marines ahve to arabs in Falludscha ... there isen't much mystery to why so much violence hgappens so often and so extensive.
Maybe where our perspective cross is that perception of safety make a lot of reason for gun ownership. And that is my point - the US doesn't have much trust. Not in the police, not the gov, not your neighbour, black vs latino, latino vs. white, white vs. all others, and vice versa. Rich against poor, poor against minority, republican vs. democrat, christian sect 1 against christian sect 2, and so on.
This nation is at war. And where others are in social trouble as well, the US is unfortunatly armed to the teeth and life in a strange perception of being the best possible society humans can technically establish.
That prevents (the bigger parts of) americans from realising that the're pretty down the road in culture and social cohesion. For european fascists, the US is a role model, and for everyone else its a third world nation that just have a too big army to tell them right in the face.
So that might create some gaps in perception, depending on position.
MultiCULTuralism is like that.
I disagree with Trevor. I have met few gun owners that want any new gun laws, sure they might say they do publicly, but behind closed doors they want machine guns and grenade launchers to be legal.
You clearly don't understand anything
You’re right.... they want whatever the criminals have or more to defend themselves and their families
@@Megatron_James_Brady8121dude thinks everyone thats a criminal has a firearm and just robs houses with you and your family in it. Anyone smart doesnt raid your house while you’re there first of all, second we need guns out of mentally ill hands, third not every crime has a gun connected but school/mass shooting do because hmm theyre SHOOTINGS. Instead of writing comments, seriously inquire forums or real life conversation to see the big picture, get out of whatever criminals will have all the guns and well have none mindset, it’s uneducated.
Which is reasonable. We should have access to the weapons the people ruling over us have
The studies they quote are done through biased sources and have less than 1,000 people out of 335,000,000 people in the US. Most gun owners do not support these. This is another fallacy.
If a group of people is capable of releasing a fullisade of bullets its a miltia that is constitutionally required to be well regulated even if only one person is in the group.
The court ignored the phrase well regulated militia in 2008 using "alternative" history. The defense counsel didn't provide the actual history.
In 1789 the senate required moving that phrase to the start of the amendment inorder to approve the wording. Pacifists were a political force. And small states feared the people in the bordering states. Unregulated militia were a likely source of considerable damage just like Shay's Rebellion immediately before the constitutional was written. Having been required for ratification it can't be ignored.
Wish we could also control guns here in Pakistan. But our problem is many times more complex. We have terrorism here. And a lot of the general people have unregistered guns. I don't know how can guns be controlled here. But if we could, we would control terrorism.
The exact same problem happens in the US to black and brown communities. Their cities heavily restrict gun ownership despite poor neighborhoods being full of criminal with illegal guns. They purposefully do that because they can keep them poor and unprotected for free votes. Otherwise they'd solve the gang problem themselves.
In a room of fools Trevor is the Beak Of Light Of High Intelligence
Bleeding Out book is example of what you are calling for!!
I love you trevor
Trevor Noah: one of the few common sense voices on this whole issue.
I'll add to his point about trying to solve it and getting rid of loopholes, speaking of loopholes, whenever talking about this issue I think it's important to remember that the people who are protecting guns so hard don't even realize they misinterpreted their own 2nd amendment so they created a loophole. The second amendment clearly states that
"A well regulated militia, that is needed for the protection of a free state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed"
Notice it says Well regulated militia. What do conservatives say "the right to bear arms prevents the banning of guns" BUT THEY MISINTERPRETING THE AMENDMENT! See what misinformation does? It only took me to just look it up and refute their claims. It only applies to well regulated militia so not military or police but a group of everyday people defending the state. Mass shooters ARE NOT a Militia so nothing should be against the rules. Even Antonin Scalia in his legal opinion said "there's nothing in the constitution preventing any regulation on guns" so when they try to defend guns they quite literally have no Idea what they're saying!
I miss him so much.
❤
Noah for President! ❤
Oh, how I wish that were a possibility.
All that is needed is psych eval for every potential owner like in my country. Czechia is very pro gun ownership yet each person that wishes to acquire one has to pass psych eval and go through safety course they have to pass. To became gun owner is basically same as getting drivers license here. You have to be adult and you have to be sane and show responsibility that’s all that is required. Yet we have almost no gun violence here compared to the US.
We have a constitutional right to own guns. This is not the same.
it's actually a nice idea until we start talking about what is a normal person???
For example In my opinion transgenders should not have guns the same for none binary people.
If you ask a fascist democrat he will tell you if you don't support BLM that's a red flag .
@@MagicBus-ct7fe Well that makes you not normal and a bigot in my case so in my opinion YOU should not be allowed gun and get some therapy instead to cure you of your bigotry. And a psych eval which is obviously also needed in your case. Hint you would probably not pass it in my country.
@@S1D3W1ND3R015 So according to you an insane person should be allowed weapons? All you need is to be a citizen, to be an adult and to be sane in my country to get a gun.
Many gun owners show responsibility here because they don't have any issues handling weapons. That is constantly demonstrated. I have been shooting since I was 6 years old. I have been well trained via family and not governmentally trained. Yet I haven't killed anyone and I haven't maimed anyone.
I love you Trevor. Trevor should be president of the United States. Trevor should be a world leader
🙌
Ban guns! Save the books 📚!
What books?
Bring back Trevor Noah!
Clearly out of touch with reality, especially the gun community. I have not met a single daily firearm user advocate what he said. His reasoning and logic are the reason why I know he has not really known any gun community. He doesn't even understand where their reasonings are coming from.
Facts
Here is a message for responsible firearm owners.
Since personal protection is one's own business, and not determined by any rogue politicians random decision, go ahead and carry your firearm as you choose best for you.
By the way, this new definition, "Gun Violence Prevention" package is just another way to spin the ultimate goal by these gun control hacks.
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾😘
America is not "Hopeful", we are desperate and dying. What is he talking about?
@@VaroVammaYes you are.
If only it was a small group of people......
watched a pragerU video abt guns just before seeing this and i gotta say we need more people like Trevor coz theres some dumb people out there😂
Like people who riot over dead felons like George Floyd.
That is why guns arent going anywhere. Get used to it.😂
we miss Trevor 😢😢
Is this show still on? No host yet?
Miss Trev
His soul.
Miss him
I have a great deal of hope regarding gun control. I HOPE some day that the left will stop trying to take guns away from law abiding Americans.
Unfortunately it’s not that small but very loud group as much as it’s the legislators owned by the gun lobby.
Its not about banning all weapons, just certain types of them. I live in " one of the most dangerous countries in the world " and here military type weapons are not sold to the public, you can have as many shotguns, glocks, revolvers and hunting rifles you want with registration, and if you don't feel safe with a shotgun in your hands whatever you're afraid of isnt real
Nope. It's about banning nearly all weapons. The deadliest school shooting was done with pistols, is Mr. Noah going to ban handguns?
What will Mr. Noah do when people ignore his confiscation order?
I'm from a gun-free, almost weapon-free country. Ur all so weird, being afraid isn't even a thing here. Literally if someone attacks u it's either with an illegal weapon (highly unlikely) or a pocket knife, in that case just carry a pocket knife as well. U guys keep this whole thing going, ur all posessed with fear. You don't need a firearm or massive knife to protect yourself if there's nothing to protect yourself from.. people having guns makes other people feel the need to have guns because all you guys care about is your 'property' and being agressive about protecting it and yourself. If you banned guns you wouldn't have to be so paranoid about other people shooting your with their guns
@@JChang0114literally just reward people for handing in their guns, using the police to check if people really don't have a gun, etc etc it's not an easy process and everyone will protest but it will make your country so much safer and respectable cause honestly to the majority of most countries america is those insane ppl who'd rather have their kids slaughtered at school than give up their guns
@@gss4470 How will you reward me for turning in my gun? Are we going to seize the property and money of only people that don't have guns?
If not, the only thing you are doing is taking people's property and paying them back with their own tax dollars.
As for using the police, how will you accomplish that with them needing a warrant to search a person's house?
Finally, what if people resist? Are we really going to have an armed confrontation over a pistol?
@@JChang0114 -"How will you reward me for turning in my gun?" It's called a gun buyback program.
-"Are we going to seize the property and money of only people that don't have guns?" Where the heck did that come from? Nobody is talking about seizing property and money, only buying back the guns.
-"and paying them back with their own tax dollars" Tax cuts are a reward. Tax money is definitely better used to remove guns from the streets than to sink into the already overinflated military budget.
-"Finally, what if people resist? Are we really going to have an armed confrontation over a pistol?" Personally I don't think confiscation is necessary. Between voluntary buybacks, stricter requirements for gun purchases and better laws to prevent straw purchases the number of guns in circulation could be reduced over time. However, if it comes to the point that there is an actual ban on guns, the answer to your last question would be "yes". Many people have already shown that they are willing to have an armed confrontation about very silly things, including someone they don't like ringing the doorbell, using their yard for hide and seek, or even showing support for the pride community. These people will eventually have an armed confrontation anyways, so it might as well be against law enforcement that is ready for them. This way no innocent people are killed.
The Second Amendment is crystal clear that we the people have the unalienable right to keep and bear arms.
Please educate me, what’s happening to TDS? why just posting old clips and no new videos??
I wish he could run for president
🤣🤣🤣🤣 take it easy fanboy. This guy will get eaten in the world of politics
😂dumb normy Democrats.
Curing cancer, getting to Mars are glamorous and in the future, AND someone else (a group of scientists and engineers) is doing the work! Safety laws for firearms are up to us. We must do the everyday hard work of thinking about laws to improve safety now, in the present. We have to be make an effort and execute laws that are improvements. That is asking too much of us/we !!! We/us like the fantasy of the future achievements of others so much more.
Umm I thought he left the daily show?
He did, this is a rerun. There's still a strike, and Trevor's in South Africa.
Trevor…why are you so quiet about Amhara Genocide in Ethiopia?
Trevor how are you so 🥹
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Psy-op
Noah, how are your people doing down there in South Africa? They haven't been able to keep the power on four more than half a day for over a year, you guys really mucked up things down there in that country
I always wanted to see trevor and colion noir sit down and talk about this.
Journalists are just glorified paid advertisements. Colion Noir is a lawyer. It's like pitting a toddler against prime Tyson.
Colion would destroy Trevor.
Wow Daily Show died when trevor left daily show... i wonder if trevor left or daily show left trevor.. in any case... it died the day trevor noah is no longer with the daily show and they keep on putting old clips of him. LOL!
Just to remind that the term "Americans" refers to everyone who lives on the continent America. Being American is not unique to living in the United States.
Then what would you call people from America genius, Mexicans are from Mexico Canadians are from Canada, this is a general saying that is used around the world
This was a whole Ted Talk. ❤
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
As someone living in America that grew up with school shootings as a reality, I find myself losing hope that effective gun control is possible at this point. We are more than 120 guns per 100 people in the US. At what point are we passed the point of no return?
A hair cut is possible to, but i don't see u doing it
Why is there so much energy to remove the tool but not the reasons people do the things they do? Guns used to be taught in schools and this wasn't an issue. In the late 80s & early 90s, you would see guns in gun racks in pick up trucks in school parking lots & this wasn't an issue. The gun hasn't changed but society has. Why isn't that being addressed?
The answer is very simple. The gun violence problem has nothing to do with guns. It is a cultural erosion issue. One that has been caused by the same idiots that focus on banning the tool. Societal rot. People need to stop looking at politicians as the rescuing hero and see them for the villians of the story. Then things will make more sense.
It's to further their agenda. If they actually enforced gun laws currently and / or kept criminals and repeat offenders in jail, we wouldn't be talking about this to this extent. Crime and violence is inevitable, but if they actually care about safety. They would do what I said before and stop focusing on disarming lawful citizens.
I feel that a lot of pro gun lovers will have to lose their loved ones to Mass shootings in order for them to make the laws. Otherwise the loss of innocent children's lives doesn't phase them one bit coz they have no relationships to these poor kids. It has to hit home for them to wake up and make a change which is very sad n disappointing.
False. A lot of people involved in shootings have this thing called blame the person and not the inanimate object. A lot is silenced by media because it doesn't fit the narrative.
Cops won’t protect your home. Only you can.
You can't ban or regulate bad intent
yup. thats what it’s gonna have to take. those guys are gonna have to have there kid shot and left on the pavement unfortunately. nobody cares till the problem hits home for sure.
@@rzwitdauncutYou're free to move elsewhere to a place with more authoritarian control. Goodbye, be sure to write. We'll miss you.....
Unhappy people are always louder than happy people. Maybe happy people need to learn to be louder...
I miss Trevor 👁👁
stop trying to find a better host, you had the best already
just find a person
I want to see news
One of the main things that puts a end to logic = money
Why don't you go to Ukraine
Is he back?? I don't understand
No, this is a rerun. He's in South Africa doing stand-up.
"Try again and try again and try again and one day you succeed or die of old age"......Unfortunately, this is the story of Bernie Sanders on trying to be president, to be the one who would have changed things.
Republicans love to call names, point fingers and ignore the truth.
Once Bernie was labeled a socialist, he became a pariah.
"Democratic" socialists reject most self-described socialist states and Marxism-Leninism
What would he have changed exactly?
@@porfiriato84 Bernie is based. Everything he promises is capitalism with extra step and would've been a disaster, but at least he's based.
I'm all for regulation, but it's going to be a slow and painful process to do properly. Gun ownership is too ingrained into our society to just do away with by writing laws.
The Second Amendment clearly states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Laws cannot override the Constitution, so the only way to regulate guns is to amend the Constitution. Until that time, a simple majority of five can overturn any law written regarding gun ownership. I'm no lawyer, so I have no idea how to word that, but it needs to start slowly, limiting who can own and possess, and then later on the type of weapons that can be purchased, whether it be a private transaction or commercial. I fear there is no easy way to eliminate what is already out there, but you can make it where they must be registered and licensed, cannot pass hands, and upon the death of the owner, it gets destroyed.
"The only way to regulate guns is to amend the Constitution."
Like Gaveys 28th amendment, which has zero chance of being passed. You do understand that by proposing that you are admitting that they are constitutionally protected by the 2A. Otherwise, why would you need to amend the Constitution to make it constitutional? You get what I mean?...
The thing is though, it's an amendment. By definition, it can be changed or discarded without harming the Constitution.
What you suggest literally requires the second amendment to be repealed. Registration is federally prohibited under FOPA. Why can you not leave your family or friends your personal firearms?
@@1911GreaterThanALL A Constitutional Amendment allowing the regulation of firearms is the only way to even begin to tackle this issue. I was suggesting that one possible way to remove from circulation firearms already in circulation would be to disallow passing them on, even when you die. There is no easy or fast way out of this, even with an Amendment. Too many firearms are out there, and there is no way to regulate them or remove them.
@@johnnywest5445 So essentially make the country less free is what you are arguing for?
Is this new?
look at who is mostly being killed by guns and you will have your answer as to why They refuse to regulate. remember the last time they regulated guns and why?
It’s not guns that are the problem, it people and the culture they grow up in.
Some cultures glorify gun and gang use.
Americans haven't lost hope that our right to bare arms will not be infringed; but we aren't getting complacent either.
Yeah y'all think Noah's Wise because your not asking the right questions, people never ask well how many lives have guns saved way more than that they've taken but they don't want you to know that, so wake up before it's too late.