Gun control won't work in america because they are taught aggression from a very young age. They are just aggressive people. Look what happened in Sandy hook elementary, small babies died, but still they are so aggressive in keeping their arms. They are proud of their ultra-aggressive nature, their wildness.
Exactly. Drug laws are aimed at demographics that people in power feel like they need to control through an overbearing justice system. Drug laws are never enforced on rich white kids who clearly deal and take drugs as part of everyday life. It's exactly the same for gun laws. They were aimed at disarming black people at a time when black people were arming for self-defense, but unfortunately banning guns has become a fairy tale that promises all kind of utopian peace, when in reality banning guns achieves pretty much nothing.
@@20deepini It is a failure, make no mistake. However, rich white kids do get punished for various drug related offenses. Also, and this is only my opinion, I kinda doubt that drug laws were specifically designed to target anyone in particular, or to disarm anyone either. Logically speaking, how exactly would drug laws prevent anyone from arming themselves? You need excessive finances to do both, so for the common people, you really have to do one or the other. If anything, it seems like such laws would motivate people to give up on the drugs, and start arming themselves more. Like I said, this is just my opinion, and I'll never claim to be an expert on this subject, but it doesn't seem like what the commenter I was responding to suggested, at least not in total.
Every time someone says “Americans suck at geography” it makes me sad :( ... Ik it’s true, but as a geography finatic who is American, it makes me sad lol
The problem is that it doesn't work. People are entitled to their stupidity, regardless of how many lives it claims... even people in his position. I feel really sorry anyone with common sense living in the US, must be torture to think about all this..
Marqan it does work. Why are you saying it doesn't work, it clearly worked in Australia. You are no different than the man being interviewed by Oliver.
I was effectively in Australia in 1996 when the Port Arthur massacre happened. The vast majority of Australians agreed that the government HAD to get rid of the guns. Of course the USA is another "planet" altogether.
I live in the US and can confirm that we are indeed another planet. Our country's intelligence has gone to absolute shit and manipulating citizens is the easiest thing in the world for government and large corporations. Trump is the perfect example. So is gun control. Mind if I move to Australia with you? :)
There's a scene from "The American President" where Michael Douglas (as president Andrew Sheppard) says that to win elections in the US you have to make people afraid of something and tell them who to blame for it (Doesn't that ring a bell?? Trump maybe??)
+[Sample Text] yes, but it takes far less effort with a gun, not to mention the amount of ppl you can kill in a few minutes, vs how many you can kill with,,a knife for example.
I LOVE how Sacha Baron Cohen exposed this lunatic on his Showtime series "This Is America". He made certain that no one will have to listen and/or see this dolt ever again.
I hope that guy doesn't treat his guns the way he treats his arguments. He clearly shot himself in the foot there, and then massacred himself completely.
It's an idiot, making arguments for idiots, to fill some air so other idiots can keep blocking any kind of meaningful legislation to have a group of amoral a-holes (who might be idiots) can keep making money. In other words: He doesn't need to make good arguments. Because back then, just as today, it's not about rational thoughts and arguments.
@@Shuizid It was always about rational thought. The idea that you could protect everyone with simple laws is secondary to personal liberty. They say gun control worked in Australia but did it actually lower crime? No it didn't and the us is 14x larger than them, yet has fewer rapes. They also still have shootings over there, so it is a failure. Criminals still have guns and law abiding citizens don't.
@@pperry6715 The US has fewer "reported" rapes. Doesn't mean less rapes are happening. And did you know, that before commiting a crime, a criminal is actually a law-abiding cirizen? So if a law-abiding citizen buys a gun and then commits a crime, we got a criminal with a gun. If law abiding citizen cannot buy guns, they would need to become criminals first BEFORE having a gun just for trying to buy it. And buying things on the black market is a lot harder than buying something at Walmart. Hence gun control would significantly reduce the number of criminals with guns. Also who cares about law-abiding citizens having guns? Does it in any way reduce crimes? Well no, the US has a high crime-rate, as well as a high rate of mass-shootings. Gun ownership doesn't make anything better - talking about failures xD
@@Shuizid You have no idea what you're talking about. You know nothing of the connected in this country and the way guns are moving. I have seen it first hand, it isn't as hard to get black market guns are you think it is. Also, they have shootings in Australia, that means it is a failure! Why, because they cannot legally go into the store and buy them anymore, yet criminals seem to have them. Here's another tip for you, being a criminal comes down to intent. If they purchased the gun to commit the crime, they've already premeditated it and thus they have criminal intent. Law Abiding Citizens do not buy guns with the idea they're going to shoot somebody as soon as they get it. I know tons of people that have at least 4 different guns, not one of them has ever shot anyone with them or committed any crimes. They do not deserve to be punished because people think these laws work, they don't! Also, the second amendment wasn't just about protecting people from others.
Other countries have already figured this shit out gun laws. Sweden figured out you can have guns and be safe. Universal health care 32 other countries have figured it out. Are country is one of the most corrupt countries in the world democrat or republican they all on the corporate dime. You call them perdue pharma I call them drug cartel.
It’s cause it’s not in the bill of rights😂 which tbh when the bill of rights was made only white landowning men would vote! So we listening to a bunch of 200 year old racist mynsoginist white men
Wrong. They both are and should be cemented as completely inalienable rights except for cases of extreme mental illness in the case for guns. Felon or not, it should not make you no longer capable of exercising either right.
"You wanna buy some death sticks?" "You don't want to sell me death sticks... You want to go home and re-think your life" "I want to go home and re-think my life"
... the link you provided could actually be summed up by "most of the time, it is illegal to carry swords". Well, I suppose I can understand the logic. Especially when it comes to katanas. I mean, those are notoriously overpowered. How could any guns protect you from those?
@@landonhigginbotham6107 Yeah it's so wrong, what you actually have to do is go to a gun show, and not tell people your plan. A watertight way to make mass shootings impossible.
@@-BuddyGuy Just stop. You know what he's saying. And for those who don't.. Well Cesar was saying "anyone" could go to a shop and get military weapon; -without an I.D/license, with no background check.. And that's all pretty much false. You DO need a background check and an ID to do that background check. I guess you can say that you can get something "like" a military weapon, but it's still not the same. And you can do the same with many other firearms whether being "military like" or not.
@@muddyhotdog4103 Note that I said show, not shop. And you pro gun maniacs can't see the wood for the trees. These details don't matter. All you want is your right to blow away your wife and kids if you forget your meds, and all we want is to add a couple of checks and balances here and there to make it just a touch less easy to do that. An AR-15 is a military style weapon because in most countries only the military would carry such a weapon. Without any political brainwashing that should be obvious. So I put it to you sir that YOU are the one who is being disingenuous.
As an Aussie i am so appalled at my lack of freedom and how dangerous it is here, oh well might go for a bbq, then a few beers at the pub and stroll home after midnight to get over it.
When people were dying because of car accidents, did we say "give them more cars."? Of course not. We ,made cars and roads safer. We created signs, lights, speed limits to control and regulate traffics. We made strict laws you had to obey, created traffic ofificers to make sure you were following the law, and pnsihments if you broke those laws. And it worked, mortality rate involving cars went down. Why are we refusing to do the same with guns?
"When people were dying because of car accidents, did we say "give them more cars."? Of course not." Car ownership is among record numbers. Guns are no different. In either case you are limited to how much money you have not that people are giving people cars they are buying them. "We ,made cars and roads safer. We created signs, lights, speed limits to control and regulate traffics." Yet vehicle deaths exceed gun deaths even though vehicles are regulated more than firearms. Vehicles are inherently more dangerous than guns. "And it worked, mortality rate involving cars went down." It has been going back up. The rate of DUIs have increased and vehicle fatalities have been going up due to incompetence and/or negligence. Firearms deaths that have been increasing are homicides and suicides. "Why are we refusing to do the same with guns?" Mainly because it is dubious to prove that previous attempt at gun controls worked. The federal ban on assault weapons for example 94-04 was completely ineffective at reducing gun homicide or mass shootings. The average for that date range is slightly higher than average.
@@lilldavid6903 "australia is authoritarian?" favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom. When it comes to firearms absolutely.
We live in Australia, we know our way of life. We know for sure we would come home at the end of the day without some random stranger shooting at us. I can't say the same about you Americans though. You can say whatever you want with your bullshit statistics. All of that have nothing on the real experience we as Australians live day to day. And to be quite frank, I feel sorry for you. It must be shit to live in a state of constant fear and paranoia.
Yeah you realize that despite any law, a person is capable of shooting you in Australia. Since general gun ownership is still allowed, there's nothing to assume that you can't be shoot in Australia. I mean I'd call it lazy logic but even that would be a major compliment to that rambling.
Come take our underclass back to Australia with you, along with their weapons. Then we will see who wants gun control. Watch them proliferate like, shall we say, rabbits. But they are not rabbits, so no rabbit fence. Let them bring your country down, while you observe it all, helplessly, because they are human and you cannot force learning on them. Learning is about the only thing our country has to offer that our underclass does not willingly grab.
I have noticed that the young ones promote learning and trying to learn as "acting white." And I've noticed that many white kids emulate the black ways;, my grandson, Joe, included. I have noticed that they like to be praised for unpraiseworthy behavior, and an "in your face attitude." I have noticed that some among them like to brandish guns and hop around while high, including the one who tried to rob my store , pointing a gun at me and dragging me backward down an aisle, knocking my clerk down and scaring her with threats. I was 70 years old at the time, but got away from him. He ran after me yelling, "Stop, I'll shoot!" Inept, he was. I hope he took up some other line of work. // I am glad he had a gun and not a knife. "They" buy guns but they can't buy bullets.
The problems with the second amendment: •It was designed in the 1700s when all that was available were muskets, meaning that a small militia army could genuinely rival the authority of the government if they felt they were abusing their power. Now the government have drones, tanks, fighter jets, anti-aircraft weapons... The people really cant fight back anymore... • while its true that some people want guns to protect themselves, putting special laws on guns would make it much harder for criminals to get guns, meaning you wouldn't need them... Also the average gun owner is 70-80% more likely to use the gun on themselves (purposefully or accidentally) then to use it on an intruder or attacker.
***** So much misinformation. Firstly, if the "US military will never attack it's own citizens" why do you need to arm yourself against them? Secondly, Australia didn't ban firearms, we restricted them. We have as many guns now as we did before the buybacks, but for the most part they aren't in the hands of idiots, unlike in the US as we see in the news every 4 to 6 weeks when the next shooting massacre happens.
***** hmmm, you DO have massacres every 4 to 6 weeks. but, besides that, your last sentence is important, but you don't realise it. Yet. Basically, there would be almost no need to stop "the bad guy" with a "carry", if you had reasonable gun control. Your failure to see this, is mind boggling! Oh! I forgot, Americans don't understand irony. And this is without even mentioning, domestic violence murders, suicides and assaults with a gun.
Greetings from the future. Watching this after the Parkland Florida High School shooting on Valentines Day 2018. Still no meaningful Gun Control in the US. Sorry,
@Kevin the Duck Then explain how Australia unfucked itself after it had a mass shooting? Should we just have zero constraints on gun ownership, allowing anyone to get one and to use it even for nefarious intent? What do we do? Do we let mass shootings go on and on in this great nation, or should we do something about it?
I love the absolute fact that at the end of the interview, after the absolute murder of the mans logic against gun control, John did what we call a “double tap” when the man himself put out logic that proved gun control would work... Absolute madlad
+Adam Borison I'm gonna help you out here: "and the point of guns is?" exactly... guns were invented with the express thought of killing people... that logic doesn't apply.
+All Omen the point of guns were... to hunt game so your family wouldn't starve? And just somewhere along the way people found it to be a good murder people.
Guns mostly serve as a protection mechanism. This is common sense. Why police services? They are not carrying guns to commit murders or assassinate people. That's actually the main use for guns in our societies. Newsflash for the mentally rétarded: Citizens would want to carry guns because a cop is too heavy. Only the typical childish millennial hippie inside the rètarded liberal bubble echo chamber would conclude guns are a harmful thing that exists to harm people. You can't un-invent guns either btw. Newsflash: Compared to gun owners, American cops are three times more likely to commit murder. There are not enough to patrol the streets in any major city and much less to handle crime. Fought in court to avoid their duty to protect citizens, and won. America constitutes 5% of the world, but possess 25% of world's felons. 3/4 for non violent crimes. And prisons are run by corporations. *The idea that cops are going to protect the poor, or the typical man-children hippie is seriously laughable.* Libtards "think" that just because we live in the future and it ain't 1776 anymore, we don't need a firearm, and "think" the government is out there to serve the public. They are immature, self-righteous, entitled, emotional, triggered, hippies who want parental governments to take care of their SJW lives from cradle to grave.
No the point of guns is to win wars by killing people. The only reason the 2nd amendment exists is for our right for a militia so that the gov't doesn't get too perverse
Ruthie Muqatach you do realize your government has nukes, tanks and drones right? Do you really think a bunch of hillbillies with double barrels can do jack shit if the government decides to take over?
@@Bri32675 I meant gun control arguements in general. I'll do one now. " only the police should have guns " What the police think of civilians owning guns : "Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe," writes Police One Editor in Chief Doug Wyllie, "police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility." The most telling results are these: What effect do you think a federal ban on manufacture and sale of some semi-automatic firearms, termed by some as "assault weapons," would have on reducing violent crime? Response Percent Response Count Significant 1.6% or 227 Moderate 6.0% or 885 None 71.0% or 10,397 Negative 20.5% or 3,004 Unsure 0.9% or 129 answered question14,642 4 of 17 6. Do you think a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that holdmore than 10 rounds would reduce violent crime? ResponsePercent ResponseCount Yes 2.7% or 391 No 95.7% or 14,013 Unsure 1.6% or 238 answered question14,642 7. Do you think that a federal law prohibiting private, non-dealer transfers of firearmsbetween individuals would reduce violent crime? ResponsePercentResponseCount Yes 11.5% or 1,684 No 79.7% or 11,663 Unsure 8.8% or 1,295 answered question14,642 If you were Sheriff or Chief, how would you respond to more restrictive gun laws? ResponsePercentResponseCount Not enforce and join in the.public, vocal opposition effort 44.9% or 6,440 Not enforce and quietly leadagency in opposite direction 17.2% or 2,468 Enforce and publicly support theproposed legislation 7.9% or 1,132 Enforce and quietly lead agency insupport of legislation 10.0% or 1,440 Unsure 20.0% or 2,869 answered question14,349
Reading through the comments I'm aghast that people, after watching this video, are STILL advocating gun rights... SERIOUSLY, ARE YOU FUCKING INSANE?????
aghast that people would take this comedy sketch for facts. Capt. Kirk is pro gun and did a nice add for it trecky. Ghandi and the Dahli Lama advocate gun rights too but if comedy central spins it then who is insane? You and 10 others are
curbstomper7009 Nothing is insane about that what is insane is a government that can deny you the ownership of a gun for the purpose of defending you and your family from intruders in your own home AND adding laws to make sure you cant get a gun and load it in time if you did own one for another reason. They make it so hard that shooters and hunters are givfing up the sport and gunshops have been run out of biz. You fools have been bamboozeled.
Funny guy, actually I think everyone should pass some sort of psychological exams (a lot of) to get access to weapon, if you give a weapon to a maniac he will kill everyone on his way with no reason.
+John T All serious studies do not even find a correlation between gun-control and less crime. With serious studies I mean studies that do not conclude ridiculous (obvious) things like this one: www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/18/gun-ownership-gun-deaths-study "The gun ownership rate was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death," says Bangalore. "Private gun ownership was highest in the US. Japan, on the other end, had an extremely low gun ownership rate." Not something that *painfully* stupid. On the other hand, you already know the only observable and detectable effect of the Australian gun-ban was a spike in crime, right? There was already a previously existing trend of lowering crime rate, in general, and for decades. That same trend resumed after a while. In the same time period, America experienced a way higher reduction of crime. New Zealand also experienced a higher reduction of crime rate, while not introducing any gun-control, and without any spike. The amount of gun ownership in Australia is now at the same level as before the ban. So gun ownership and crime are not correlated. The buyback didn't even manage to obtain 30% of the targeted weapons in the country and the total cost was over half a billion dollars, with that money Australians could have gotten way better things for the police. Massacres also kept happening at the same rate as before, just no gun-related. Want sources?
Shakti Kareen "Massacres also kept happening at the same rate as before, just no gun-related." In the 19 years prior to the gun buyback, there were 14 massacres in Australia, with 114 people killed. In the 19 years since the buyback, there have been 9 massacres, with 62 people killed. In other words, there has been a nearly 50% reduction in the number of people killed in massacres in Australia. "So gun ownership and crime are not correlated." Seriously? Most developed countries, like the UK, Australia and Canada experience at most 1 or 2 mass killings a year. The United States experiences one almost every day. The vast majority of massacres in the US are committed with firearms. You seriously think that that has nothing to do with the fact that it's exceedingly difficult to get hold of a handgun, or a semi-automatic gun, in those other countries, whereas in the US everyone, even criminals and mentally ill people, have easy access to firearms?
@@webdesignerguy America saw similar declines as Australia yet we didn't implement Australian gun controls. U.S. saw a more drastic reduction in homicides than Australia did. www.gunfacts.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/GUNS-IN-OTHER-COUNTRIES-Australia-and-U.S.-homicides-rates-before-and-after-Australia-gun-ban.png
You can't make this stuff up! 'Onya Australia! Meanwhile I weep for the USA, and the innocent students here that continue to lose their lives. What a tragic loss
john oliver and jim jeffries. two foreign comedians doing an amazing job of smacking pro gun Americans over the head with their own stupidity. i love it.
You're forgetting about how Sacha Baron Cohen exposed this particular lunatic on his Showtime series "This Is America". He made certain that *no one* will have to listen and/or see this dolt ever again.
@@JuICyBLiinGeR you realize John Oliver stated as a stand-up comic, was a writer for the daily show with John Stewart, and is the head writer on last week tonight... right?
+RyanX1231 Nope he was not in on the joke. Google him, the daily show actually spent a segment on all of the crazy people they had on proving that it was for real. People kept asking the same question as you do :P
Tom Geurken Thanks for clarifying. I was unsure because I know that The Daily Show leans very left and most of the jokes and skits involve making jokes at the expense of Republicans (which is funny because the people they make fun of are stupid). So I was unsure if this skit was heavily edited to take what these people said out of context, or if they somehow got these people to play up their views.
In Australia their homicide rate actually went up. Also it was a blanket ban, which would require seizing 300 million+ guns, which will not ever happen. They also fail to mention that Australia's suicide rate had been declining for 10 years prior and showed no major decrease with the ban.
Leftists "think" that just because we live in the future and it ain't 1776 anymore, we don't need a firearm, and they "think" the government is out there to serve the public.
+Joey Zasa Well make sure the government doesn't have nuclear weapons that can obliterate the entire American population. Make sure the government doesn't spend more than the next 6 nations combined as well. The conservatives lost against the 1863 U.S. military, which was much weaker than the 21st century U.S. military. Do you really think the conservatives won't lose again?
ratofvengence Obviously one causes the other because there's never high amount of crime or mass killings where they restrict guns, oh wait no, that's not true at all and you know that. Look at Mexico, Brazil and Honduras.
crazypants88 I guess you have a memory problem, because I have educated you on this before. Obviously Mexico, Brazil and Honduras have much more significant problems with poverty, inequity and corrupt govt/policing. Again, this is obvious. It is also obvious, to all but you of course, that comparing those nations to the US or Australia is inane. Yes, look at Mexico, Brazil and Honduras. See how they are NOT valid comparisons. Did you get it this time?
+XxGR3YW01FxX whats your pont? mexicans are allowed to have guns and they are fucking miserable france has strict gun laws and is doing fine oO if you want to aim at the paris attacks, less gunlaws wouldnt have prevented them. does 9/11 ring a bell? USA has 30+ people killed by a gun every day. thats one paris massacre every 4 days! in other words since the attacks only few days ago the usa had their own little massacre and you keep promoting guns?! xD whoop de fucking doooo
+Bobbin McBong *citation needed. It is illegal to own a gun in Mexico, the people who do have them are the criminals and incompetent police. Plus real smooth coming at Mexico on how miserable they are. They are not the ones with the 2nd highest anti-depressant drug consumption, it's Australia so "whoop dee fucking doo" to you back "mate". U.S. crime in general is higher in the plaves where they don't have guns or have been outlawed. That's where all the mass shootings happen you dunce. And please tell how is 9/11 is compared to a common thug/psycho walking into a building with a gun to spray down dozens of unarmed civilians. That my friend is over exaggeration for compensation to the lack of merit your points have. I could say the same about atomic bomb in Japan in ww2. As a matter of fact the only reason the Americans, not the Australians "whoop dee fucking doo", is because of the civilian armed rebellion the US discovered was being assembled in Japan's major cities. You have no merit to push gun control, plus it's not like Australia is much of a paradise either regardless. Just ask any bloke who has to live closer to the middle of the country. "Whoop dee fucking doo" you dunce. LOL
XxGR3YW01FxX "A common misconception is that firearms are illegal in Mexico and that no person may possess them.[3] This belief originates due the general perception that only members of law enforcement, the armed forces, or those in armed security protection are authorized to have them. While it is true that Mexico possesses strict gun laws,[4] where most types and calibers are reserved to military and law enforcement, the acquisition and ownership of certain firearms and ammunition remains a constitutional right to all Mexican citizens and foreign legal residents" whoop de fucking dooooooooo again xD "That's where all the mass shootings happen" no they happen fucking everywhere, because every nutsack can grab a gun in no time
+Bobbin McBong "While it is true that Mexico has strict gun restrictions..." "owning certain firearms and ammunition remains a constitutional right" I presume because of hunting, sounds like the UK, coincidentally gun free and crime risen. You made no point here, you proved me right. How is a shitty small cal. rifle of about .223 going to stop the cartel? Russia also has strict gun control, still pretty drunkenly crime ridden, literally. And if you want to incorporate history then sure the experts agree, gun control works (Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Kim Jong Un/Il, even the Confederacy with African Americans, pretty much every radical psycho trying to oppress a country). I've kicked plenty of people's asses over gun control and you are just another statistic to my RUclips debate body count "whoop dee fucking doo". P.S. Proof read your sources before using them and quit with the silly emoticons, unless you don't want me to take you seriously. P.P.S. "Whoop dee fucking doo".
XxGR3YW01FxX Your RUclips Bodycount?! xD You lost EVERY agrument and stil think you have won the debate?!? that explains everything xDDDDDDDD EMOOOTICOOONS
www.gunviolencearchive.org/ it's pretty much at least once a day.. 'mass shooting' now is like 10+ instead of just 4+ injured/killed by a gun during a single incident
Egg Lasagna people will kill one another no matter what. Compare those deaths to the 245 knife killings in the UK (much smaller country). We may have some shooting issues, but we most certainly don’t have a mass shooting problem or epidemic
Homemade Tech actually we do we have more mass shootings then almost any other country and I’m pretty sure a gun dose a lot more damage a lot quicker then a knife, also don’t you think one mass school shooting is to much or do you just care more about guns then you do innocent human lives? I’m really not trying to sound rude but you can’t ignore that shootings are a real problem in America. I personally don’t think we should get rid of all guns but I think their needs to be more regulations so that it isn’t so easy for people to get their hands on them. And like a said before its still 123 to many people dying for no reason, I’m really not trying to argue so I mean no disrespect to you but you can’t ignore that this is a real problem that we need to fix so our country can be as amazing as possible! (Sorry for any spelling or grammar mistakes typing this out fast lol)
ruofan1982 They don't even report on all the drive by shootings in the US, especially if not many people, or any, are hit like in Western Sydney. ABC is turning off comments on all their videos.
ruofan1982 You are making a conspiracy out of nothing. I checked channel 7 and 9 official youtube channels and comments were not blocked even on news stories about gang shootings. Channel 10, SBS, and ABC seemed to have comments blocked on all videos, as in all of the videos uploaded onto the channels. Not sure why.
CorporateEvolution hi there, thanks for taking time and looking for truth. sorry I didn't know channel 10, SBS, and ABC actually block comments on -ALL VIDEOS. I mostly check on videos about sydney shooting, war in Afghanistan， and seem to me they always block comment. you have explained the reason. and I was mistaken. sorry for the false information. I am very embarrassed and thanks again for correcting me.
@@EmilioReyes_97 The NICE attack used a Truck and it killed roughly the same amount of people compared to a guy with like 20 rifles in 5 minutes compared to 10 minutes.
@@1911GreaterThanALL yes.....of course running over a group of people with people is gonna be just as bloody as with a gun. But who the fuck thinks to use a truck as their default murder weapon?
@@nitewatchman1576 Incorrect. Suicides overall went down after gun control possibly because a majority of people change their mind about suicide partway through if the act takes more than an instant to happen - gun suicides are far quicker and more deadly than other forms so give no opportunity for the victims to change their mind. Homicides overall didn't change significantly, same for all other types of violent crime. Mass-murders went down as other weapons are generally not as effective as guns at mass-murder. PS as for cars, obviously it would be ideal to pedestrianise areas where large crowds are common to reduce the danger but unlike guns cars serve a very important function to society, whereas guns are a form of entertainment. If/when someone comes up with a way to use commercial "drones" for mass-murder I fully expect them to be banned/regulated as well.
+Bobbin McBong That's what gun advocates are pushing for you dunce. A system in which they are able to own a gun while at the same time preventing those with a criminal background or history of mental illness from obtaining a gun. I don't know much about the history of Australia but the only reason America, a nation far economically and socially superior to Australia "whoop dee fucking doo", was able to become a nation is exactly because of NOT having gun control. Better to have one and not need one than need one and not have one. If you were stuck in a room with 4 other guys that had guns, would you want to be the only one without a gun? Challenge your instincts and then you'll see. The majority of people who die by guns are those without gubs, don't forget that either, that could potentially any Australian tourist visiting a gun free zone in the US "whoop dee fucking doo".
XxGR3YW01FxX If you were stuck in a room with 4 other guys that had guns, would you want to be the only one without a gun? no i would want everyone to throw their gun away and live a happy life xD rekt youtube bodycount rising once again trololol
+Bobbin McBong That is just what Ghandi said until he was dispatched. Why do trolls always think "trololo" magically wins an argument? It doesn't. Like I said before: You laughing harder at an argument doesn't make you less wrong or your opponent less right. You're embarrassing yourself, unless of course you never had a valid argument to begin with that wasn't torn apart by gun advocates multiple times, myself included. You know you're losing it if you joke more than you argue. Aside from that you still haven't proven or countered anything I addressed besides Mexico in which you pretty much ruined for yourself.
Cough 45/100 people with a gun USA 88/100 with a gun Cough USA 900,000 shootings since 2005 Cough 300,000 homicide since 2005 USA is a fucking mess and you are the reason so many kids are dying. You're a disgrace to humanity
haha... "That's my point"... killed me
amazing interview
"Let me think about that for a minute"
yep, and his face was just falling apart :D
No matter how many times I rewatch it, it still kills me. ^^
Gun control won't work in america because they are taught aggression from a very young age. They are just aggressive people. Look what happened in Sandy hook elementary, small babies died, but still they are so aggressive in keeping their arms. They are proud of their ultra-aggressive nature, their wildness.
"so, there's no point in having any laws against drugs then ?"
"uuuhm, let me think about that for a sec."
best part of that interview.
There is no point
Exactly. Drug laws are aimed at demographics that people in power feel like they need to control through an overbearing justice system. Drug laws are never enforced on rich white kids who clearly deal and take drugs as part of everyday life. It's exactly the same for gun laws. They were aimed at disarming black people at a time when black people were arming for self-defense, but unfortunately banning guns has become a fairy tale that promises all kind of utopian peace, when in reality banning guns achieves pretty much nothing.
@@antidamageable
Not entirely true.
@@FBI-ju5no yeah but tbh, close enough. The drug war is a failure.
@@20deepini
It is a failure, make no mistake.
However, rich white kids do get punished for various drug related offenses.
Also, and this is only my opinion, I kinda doubt that drug laws were specifically designed to target anyone in particular, or to disarm anyone either.
Logically speaking, how exactly would drug laws prevent anyone from arming themselves? You need excessive finances to do both, so for the common people, you really have to do one or the other.
If anything, it seems like such laws would motivate people to give up on the drugs, and start arming themselves more.
Like I said, this is just my opinion, and I'll never claim to be an expert on this subject, but it doesn't seem like what the commenter I was responding to suggested, at least not in total.
"Right."
"Right."
"Right.... That's ... my point."
I'm sobbing
ruclips.net/video/XbkNIoJ-9jY/видео.html
Just throwing this out there
I love how he accidentally tumbled into the right conclusion.
Lies again? Control oil
ruclips.net/video/XbkNIoJ-9jY/видео.html
Just throwing this out there
a broken clock is right twice a day also that man is insane
thos extra blinks spoke louder than him
"OK OK OK I see it all so clearly now.... We should outlaw private pools."
"But in the real world, with real people, it doesn't work".
I know most americans frightenly suck at geography, but this goes beyond words...
sorry becouse apparently 90% of the world is NOT the real world.
Is funny to live in fictional world
Every time someone says “Americans suck at geography” it makes me sad :( ... Ik it’s true, but as a geography finatic who is American, it makes me sad lol
@@masonh4309 imagine how muslims who abhor terrorism feel 😑
S†. Clou† lol. How do u mean?
@@masonh4309 the Americans being fat and bad at subjects is a sucky stereotype, but it must suck to have a detrimental stereotype.
Seeing someone with such a dumb point being so cleanly and reasonably defeated is very satisfying
TheRealBeatMaster Do you know why there is the second Amendment?
Pvt Torres Because that's how the 18th century worked
''That's my point'' is one of the funniest things I've ever heard on a TV show. Context makes everything.
The problem is that it doesn't work. People are entitled to their stupidity, regardless of how many lives it claims... even people in his position.
I feel really sorry anyone with common sense living in the US, must be torture to think about all this..
Marqan it does work. Why are you saying it doesn't work, it clearly worked in Australia. You are no different than the man being interviewed by Oliver.
I was effectively in Australia in 1996 when the Port Arthur massacre happened. The vast majority of Australians agreed that the government HAD to get rid of the guns. Of course the USA is another "planet" altogether.
I live in the US and can confirm that we are indeed another planet. Our country's intelligence has gone to absolute shit and manipulating citizens is the easiest thing in the world for government and large corporations. Trump is the perfect example. So is gun control. Mind if I move to Australia with you? :)
There's a scene from "The American President" where Michael Douglas (as president Andrew Sheppard) says that to win elections in the US you have to make people afraid of something and tell them who to blame for it (Doesn't that ring a bell?? Trump maybe??)
....actually I said I WAS in Australia. I live in Perú now. :-)
Totally rings a bell...and proofs my point...US IS another planet.
Yep! It was extremely effective! So effective that people found other ways of killing each other, yay!
Someone give this man his own show and some Emmys.
And a Peabody award
hold my beer, Whoop-de-do
@@ToddHowar.d Right over your head huh
Roseand Stem I see now I’ve been r/woosh’d, damn it
and his own award for helping koalas who fucked to much
"We don't do background checks for the first amendment." That doesn't make sense.
+Awesome 45 lol. exactly
Yep... Cause, ha know, all those mass killings by using your VOICE! This isn't just stupid, this is... Advanced stupid...
+codzomz people kill people not gubs
+[Sample Text] *guns
+[Sample Text] yes, but it takes far less effort with a gun, not to mention the amount of ppl you can kill in a few minutes, vs how many you can kill with,,a knife for example.
2:49 "mass shootings are rare anyhow"
Woop-dee-do we just had two in a day.
Thats..........progress?! 🤭
Its evolving, just backwards.
Shootings are due to mental illness and poverty. Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
@@TheSm1thers people kill people
But with guns
@@lukepimblott7141 Yeah but they don't kill people because of guns.
In the words of John Oliver, "Are you fucking kidding me?"
Davis Moniz
WOOPTY FUCKING DOO
Vorducas Zizroth Woopty flamin doo....
Vorducas Zizroth 2015 and still no mass shootings. WOOPTY DOO.
Teunis Swart 2011 Hectorville siege
+Jeffrey Lafleur That wasn't a mass shooting.
"Mass shootings are really rare anyhow"
YIKES... REALLY DID NOT AGE WELL
I LOVE how Sacha Baron Cohen exposed this lunatic on his Showtime series "This Is America". He made certain that no one will have to listen and/or see this dolt ever again.
HAVENT SEEN ANY IN LONG TIME
John Oliver's an international treasure!
He belongs to America now.
@@CherryBlossomOhka you can keep him, but you have to keep james cordyn too
Cordelia May John Oliver is a fucken idiot
Personally I prefer Russell Howard
@@dicklong8275 k boomer
It's a good thing that this guy is equipped with automatic guns because he shot himself in the foot repeatedly in rapid succession.
I hope that guy doesn't treat his guns the way he treats his arguments. He clearly shot himself in the foot there, and then massacred himself completely.
Yeah but thats no Problem The more guns the more accidents with Guns totally normal to him
It's an idiot, making arguments for idiots, to fill some air so other idiots can keep blocking any kind of meaningful legislation to have a group of amoral a-holes (who might be idiots) can keep making money.
In other words: He doesn't need to make good arguments. Because back then, just as today, it's not about rational thoughts and arguments.
@@Shuizid It was always about rational thought. The idea that you could protect everyone with simple laws is secondary to personal liberty.
They say gun control worked in Australia but did it actually lower crime? No it didn't and the us is 14x larger than them, yet has fewer rapes. They also still have shootings over there, so it is a failure. Criminals still have guns and law abiding citizens don't.
@@pperry6715 The US has fewer "reported" rapes. Doesn't mean less rapes are happening.
And did you know, that before commiting a crime, a criminal is actually a law-abiding cirizen? So if a law-abiding citizen buys a gun and then commits a crime, we got a criminal with a gun. If law abiding citizen cannot buy guns, they would need to become criminals first BEFORE having a gun just for trying to buy it. And buying things on the black market is a lot harder than buying something at Walmart. Hence gun control would significantly reduce the number of criminals with guns.
Also who cares about law-abiding citizens having guns? Does it in any way reduce crimes? Well no, the US has a high crime-rate, as well as a high rate of mass-shootings. Gun ownership doesn't make anything better - talking about failures xD
@@Shuizid You have no idea what you're talking about. You know nothing of the connected in this country and the way guns are moving. I have seen it first hand, it isn't as hard to get black market guns are you think it is.
Also, they have shootings in Australia, that means it is a failure! Why, because they cannot legally go into the store and buy them anymore, yet criminals seem to have them.
Here's another tip for you, being a criminal comes down to intent. If they purchased the gun to commit the crime, they've already premeditated it and thus they have criminal intent. Law Abiding Citizens do not buy guns with the idea they're going to shoot somebody as soon as they get it.
I know tons of people that have at least 4 different guns, not one of them has ever shot anyone with them or committed any crimes. They do not deserve to be punished because people think these laws work, they don't!
Also, the second amendment wasn't just about protecting people from others.
New NRA slogan
“Our feelings don’t care about your facts”
@Kevin the Duck what kinda math is that dude?
@Kevin the Duck wtf are you on about?
New NRA slogan
“Whoop-de-do!”
@Kevin the Duck your clarification is as illiterate as your initial comment
Guns are necessary to protect your liberties, you moron.
5 years later and we're still hearing the same old stupid points.
Giby86 6 now 😂
7 now .. And I am pretty sure it will be the same in another 7 years
Giby86 move to Australia
@@laurimario Why should I? I'm perfectly happy in Europe.
Other countries have already figured this shit out gun laws. Sweden figured out you can have guns and be safe. Universal health care 32 other countries have figured it out. Are country is one of the most corrupt countries in the world democrat or republican they all on the corporate dime. You call them perdue pharma I call them drug cartel.
"Even his logic is bulletproof" Thank God this guy got his own show...just genius.
I find it sad that in America some people think voting is a privilege and owning a gun is a right when it clearly should be the other way around
It’s cause it’s not in the bill of rights😂 which tbh when the bill of rights was made only white landowning men would vote! So we listening to a bunch of 200 year old racist mynsoginist white men
Wrong. They both are and should be cemented as completely inalienable rights except for cases of extreme mental illness in the case for guns. Felon or not, it should not make you no longer capable of exercising either right.
Voting is a right to citizens.
@@slayerfan209no country respects you
4:02 jesus John you didn’t need to murder the guy. His soul just left his body on air.
"You wanna buy some death sticks?"
"You don't want to sell me death sticks... You want to go home and re-think your life"
"I want to go home and re-think my life"
Nice
Nice
Great lobbying!
All I want is the right to carry a sword. Until that happens, I have no sympathy for people with guns.
are you not allowed to?
DaaaahWhoosh you have that right
Yeah guys, it's definitely illegal to carry around a sword in the US. In most states you can't carry a knife longer than your hand.
... the link you provided could actually be summed up by "most of the time, it is illegal to carry swords".
Well, I suppose I can understand the logic. Especially when it comes to katanas. I mean, those are notoriously overpowered. How could any guns protect you from those?
Texas has open sword carry laws now, i believe.
4:12 -John is amazed at his ability to intellectually walk this guy off of a cliff
Roebuck Payne so good
What a tee up
So good, you gotta miss the daily show with all of those geniuses
Cesar what you’re saying just isn’t true. You’re horribly miss informed.
Cesar why so delusional¿¿¿😂😂
@@landonhigginbotham6107 Yeah it's so wrong, what you actually have to do is go to a gun show, and not tell people your plan. A watertight way to make mass shootings impossible.
@@-BuddyGuy Just stop. You know what he's saying. And for those who don't.. Well Cesar was saying "anyone" could go to a shop and get military weapon; -without an I.D/license, with no background check.. And that's all pretty much false. You DO need a background check and an ID to do that background check. I guess you can say that you can get something "like" a military weapon, but it's still not the same. And you can do the same with many other firearms whether being "military like" or not.
@@muddyhotdog4103 Note that I said show, not shop. And you pro gun maniacs can't see the wood for the trees. These details don't matter. All you want is your right to blow away your wife and kids if you forget your meds, and all we want is to add a couple of checks and balances here and there to make it just a touch less easy to do that. An AR-15 is a military style weapon because in most countries only the military would carry such a weapon. Without any political brainwashing that should be obvious. So I put it to you sir that YOU are the one who is being disingenuous.
As an Aussie i am so appalled at my lack of freedom and how dangerous it is here, oh well might go for a bbq, then a few beers at the pub and stroll home after midnight to get over it.
dangerous compared to where?
Tasmania
As an aussie I am appalled that you think Australians are not free and that you think it's more dangerous then America. Wow
Andrew Lock turn your sarcasm detector on and read my 1st post again :)
Well it's 2022 and that aged well...
When people were dying because of car accidents, did we say "give them more cars."? Of course not. We ,made cars and roads safer. We created signs, lights, speed limits to control and regulate traffics. We made strict laws you had to obey, created traffic ofificers to make sure you were following the law, and pnsihments if you broke those laws. And it worked, mortality rate involving cars went down. Why are we refusing to do the same with guns?
spud So australia is authoritarian?
"When people were dying because of car accidents, did we say "give them more cars."? Of course not."
Car ownership is among record numbers. Guns are no different. In either case you are limited to how much money you have not that people are giving people cars they are buying them.
"We ,made cars and roads safer. We created signs, lights, speed limits to control and regulate traffics."
Yet vehicle deaths exceed gun deaths even though vehicles are regulated more than firearms. Vehicles are inherently more dangerous than guns.
"And it worked, mortality rate involving cars went down."
It has been going back up. The rate of DUIs have increased and vehicle fatalities have been going up due to incompetence and/or negligence. Firearms deaths that have been increasing are homicides and suicides.
"Why are we refusing to do the same with guns?"
Mainly because it is dubious to prove that previous attempt at gun controls worked. The federal ban on assault weapons for example 94-04 was completely ineffective at reducing gun homicide or mass shootings. The average for that date range is slightly higher than average.
@@lilldavid6903 "australia is authoritarian?"
favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
When it comes to firearms absolutely.
1911GreaterThanALL Yeah, my comment is hard to get, but it was satirical and followed American logic when it comes to Gun controll (I’m european)
We could be friends.
We live in Australia, we know our way of life. We know for sure we would come home at the end of the day without some random stranger shooting at us. I can't say the same about you Americans though. You can say whatever you want with your bullshit statistics. All of that have nothing on the real experience we as Australians live day to day. And to be quite frank, I feel sorry for you. It must be shit to live in a state of constant fear and paranoia.
Yeah you realize that despite any law, a person is capable of shooting you in Australia. Since general gun ownership is still allowed, there's nothing to assume that you can't be shoot in Australia.
I mean I'd call it lazy logic but even that would be a major compliment to that rambling.
Come take our underclass back to Australia with you, along with their weapons. Then we will see who wants gun control. Watch them proliferate like, shall we say, rabbits. But they are not rabbits, so no rabbit fence. Let them bring your country down, while you observe it all, helplessly, because they are human and you cannot force learning on them. Learning is about the only thing our country has to offer that our underclass does not willingly grab.
Marilyn Huston Do you not wonder why this 'underclass' you speak of is there? And why they are so heavily armed?
I have noticed that the young ones promote learning and trying to learn as "acting white." And I've noticed that many white kids emulate the black ways;, my grandson, Joe, included. I have noticed that they like to be praised for unpraiseworthy behavior, and an "in your face attitude." I have noticed that some among them like to brandish guns and hop around while high, including the one who tried to rob my store , pointing a gun at me and dragging me backward down an aisle, knocking my clerk down and scaring her with threats. I was 70 years old at the time, but got away from him. He ran after me yelling, "Stop, I'll shoot!" Inept, he was. I hope he took up some other line of work. // I am glad he had a gun and not a knife. "They" buy guns but they can't buy bullets.
Marilyn Huston I remember when that didn't happen in Australia. Good times.
Hey just here to comment that 10 years later this is as relevant as ever!
Man that's just sad
Whoop de do ):
The problems with the second amendment:
•It was designed in the 1700s when all that was available were muskets, meaning that a small militia army could genuinely rival the authority of the government if they felt they were abusing their power. Now the government have drones, tanks, fighter jets, anti-aircraft weapons... The people really cant fight back anymore...
• while its true that some people want guns to protect themselves, putting special laws on guns would make it much harder for criminals to get guns, meaning you wouldn't need them... Also the average gun owner is 70-80% more likely to use the gun on themselves (purposefully or accidentally) then to use it on an intruder or attacker.
***** you, sir, are a Moron.
***** maybe the army wouldn't, but your police forces seem more than happy to take up the shack
***** So much misinformation. Firstly, if the "US military will never attack it's own citizens" why do you need to arm yourself against them? Secondly, Australia didn't ban firearms, we restricted them. We have as many guns now as we did before the buybacks, but for the most part they aren't in the hands of idiots, unlike in the US as we see in the news every 4 to 6 weeks when the next shooting massacre happens.
***** Are are you really comparing the American people to those living in Iraq? Nice comparison.
***** hmmm, you DO have massacres every 4 to 6 weeks. but, besides that, your last sentence is important, but you don't realise it. Yet.
Basically, there would be almost no need to stop "the bad guy" with a "carry", if you had reasonable gun control. Your failure to see this, is mind boggling! Oh! I forgot, Americans don't understand irony.
And this is without even mentioning, domestic violence murders, suicides and assaults with a gun.
"So, unless we can completely get rid of drugs, there's no point in having drug laws at all?"
Pure pwnage.
Greetings from the future. Watching this after the Parkland Florida High School shooting on Valentines Day 2018.
Still no meaningful Gun Control in the US.
Sorry,
@Kevin the Duck Then explain how Australia unfucked itself after it had a mass shooting?
Should we just have zero constraints on gun ownership, allowing anyone to get one and to use it even for nefarious intent? What do we do? Do we let mass shootings go on and on in this great nation, or should we do something about it?
The fact that this man was destroyed by John Oliver but still had the hubris to talk to Sacha Baron Cohen is astounding
John's faces of pure astonishment make this even funnier
"we don't have background checks for the First Amendment"
... what
I love the absolute fact that at the end of the interview, after the absolute murder of the mans logic against gun control, John did what we call a “double tap” when the man himself put out logic that proved gun control would work...
Absolute madlad
Well done, professor Duncan.
Sadly, this is still very relevant. *Le sigh*
You did not just say "le sigh"
*Le sigh*
Whoops, I did it again.
2010 called
Hello?
Yes, this is dog.
why can't Misha just be president
The look John stewart gave at the end was like of a proud Jedi master
@Achmed Seldomsinsobar except that wasn't Jon Stewart but John Oliver...
@@bellerophon- you obviously didn’t watch the end because that was John Stewart, host of the daily show.
"No way to prevent this" says only country where this happens regularly
Love that Onion title. What a tragedy
Only country with freedom
"Let me think about that for a minute."
You should have thought about all of this for a few minutes before starting your crusade.
He should have replied pointing out that the point of pools isn't to drown people.
+Adam Borison I'm gonna help you out here:
"and the point of guns is?"
exactly... guns were invented with the express thought of killing people... that logic doesn't apply.
+All Omen the point of guns were... to hunt game so your family wouldn't starve?
And just somewhere along the way people found it to be a good murder people.
Guns mostly serve as a protection mechanism. This is common sense. Why police services? They are not carrying guns to commit murders or assassinate people. That's actually the main use for guns in our societies. Newsflash for the mentally rétarded: Citizens would want to carry guns because a cop is too heavy. Only the typical childish millennial hippie inside the rètarded liberal bubble echo chamber would conclude guns are a harmful thing that exists to harm people. You can't un-invent guns either btw. Newsflash: Compared to gun owners, American cops are three times more likely to commit murder. There are not enough to patrol the streets in any major city and much less to handle crime. Fought in court to avoid their duty to protect citizens, and won. America constitutes 5% of the world, but possess 25% of world's felons. 3/4 for non violent crimes. And prisons are run by corporations. *The idea that cops are going to protect the poor, or the typical man-children hippie is seriously laughable.* Libtards "think" that just because we live in the future and it ain't 1776 anymore, we don't need a firearm, and "think" the government is out there to serve the public. They are immature, self-righteous, entitled, emotional, triggered, hippies who want parental governments to take care of their SJW lives from cradle to grave.
No the point of guns is to win wars by killing people. The only reason the 2nd amendment exists is for our right for a militia so that the gov't doesn't get too perverse
Ruthie Muqatach you do realize your government has nukes, tanks and drones right? Do you really think a bunch of hillbillies with double barrels can do jack shit if the government decides to take over?
What a bloody legend mate!
No drownings in backyards without pools, lol classic
Johns face when he says that though. 4:23
4:46 ... That empty stare that said "I'll... Just shut up now..." 😂
#Whoop-de-doo
2018
Still Whoop-de-fucking-do-ing
We should wait around doing nothing for 90 days.
#HaveAWank
This will always be one of my favourite videos of all time.
Colin Nuar debunked a lot of this.
@@Stuff857
1) You spelt his name wrong.
2) He criticized Trevor Noah from the Daily Show about this topic.
@@Bri32675
I meant gun control arguements in general. I'll do one now.
" only the police should have guns "
What the police think of civilians owning guns :
"Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe," writes Police One Editor in Chief Doug Wyllie, "police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility."
The most telling results are these:
What effect do you think a federal ban on manufacture and sale of some semi-automatic firearms, termed by some as "assault weapons," would have on reducing violent crime?
Response Percent Response Count
Significant 1.6% or 227
Moderate 6.0% or 885
None 71.0% or 10,397
Negative 20.5% or 3,004
Unsure 0.9% or 129
answered question14,642
4 of 17
6. Do you think a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that holdmore than 10 rounds would reduce violent crime?
ResponsePercent ResponseCount
Yes 2.7% or 391
No 95.7% or 14,013
Unsure 1.6% or 238
answered question14,642
7. Do you think that a federal law prohibiting private, non-dealer transfers of firearmsbetween individuals would reduce violent crime?
ResponsePercentResponseCount
Yes 11.5% or 1,684
No 79.7% or 11,663
Unsure 8.8% or 1,295
answered question14,642
If you were Sheriff or Chief, how would you respond to more restrictive gun laws?
ResponsePercentResponseCount
Not enforce and join in the.public, vocal opposition effort 44.9% or 6,440
Not enforce and quietly leadagency in opposite direction 17.2% or 2,468
Enforce and publicly support theproposed legislation 7.9% or 1,132
Enforce and quietly lead agency insupport of legislation 10.0% or 1,440
Unsure 20.0% or 2,869
answered question14,349
Pissed my pants at that Philip guy. Slowly seeing the lightbulb above his head start glowing, then dimming again :D
"There is no point to having drug laws at all."
Exactly, John. Exactly.
Perhaps they shouldn't be criminalized, but they should definitely be regulated. Drugs, that is.
LEGALISE IT!!!
"That's my point."
Oh look, almost a decade later, and still 100% relevant.
I wish this video weren't so evergreen.
It is insane how many heavy hitters came from the daily show. Jon can really pick the best people out. He really hires the best people.
Reading through the comments I'm aghast that people, after watching this video, are STILL advocating gun rights... SERIOUSLY, ARE YOU FUCKING INSANE?????
aghast that people would take this comedy sketch for facts. Capt. Kirk is pro gun and did a nice add for it trecky. Ghandi and the Dahli Lama advocate gun rights too but if comedy central spins it then who is insane? You and 10 others are
bee bendover its a comedy sketch backed up by facts... didn't you watch the video?
Right because assault weapons with 30+ ammo clips which can fire over 460-900 RPM is perfect for those things you just described...
curbstomper7009 We have all those things in Australia. We also have gun control, no shooting massacres and a homicide rate a fraction of the US.
curbstomper7009 Nothing is insane about that what is insane is a government that can deny you the ownership of a gun for the purpose of defending you and your family from intruders in your own home AND adding laws to make sure you cant get a gun and load it in time if you did own one for another reason. They make it so hard that shooters and hunters are givfing up the sport and gunshops have been run out of biz. You fools have been bamboozeled.
Funny guy, actually I think everyone should pass some sort of psychological exams (a lot of) to get access to weapon, if you give a weapon to a maniac he will kill everyone on his way with no reason.
Exactly, and every year or two they would be put through that test again, just to make sure.
It's funny because maniacs killing everyone for no reason are one of the biggest problems in the US right now
Who ELSE would buy a semi-automatic assault rifle?
+devi MURICANS
+devi You are brainwashed. Most gun owners would and they're not maniacs at all.
I died when he called America a planet.
"That's... that's my point"
Jesus that was brilliant
Every law has been broken, therefore we should have no laws! Perfect
This is one of the best story pieces tds has done. Just brilliant 👌🏾
9years from when this video was created and the U.S is still debating the same issues.
That last whoop de doo in the pub always kills me 😂😂😂
Sadly, this video will always be relevant.
You made this comment to years ago and its still relevant today.
@@katlehokomeke you made this comment 3 years ago and it's still relevant today
strict gun control laws do not cause low crime rates. That's why they always say gun related crime and murders instead of crime and murder in general.
+something name Both gun related murders and murders in general went down following the gun ban, so you're wrong.
+John T All serious studies do not even find a correlation between gun-control and less crime. With serious studies I mean studies that do not conclude ridiculous (obvious) things like this one:
www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/18/gun-ownership-gun-deaths-study
"The gun ownership rate was a strong and independent predictor of firearm-related death," says Bangalore. "Private gun ownership was highest in the US. Japan, on the other end, had an extremely low gun ownership rate."
Not something that *painfully* stupid. On the other hand, you already know the only observable and detectable effect of the Australian gun-ban was a spike in crime, right? There was already a previously existing trend of lowering crime rate, in general, and for decades. That same trend resumed after a while. In the same time period, America experienced a way higher reduction of crime. New Zealand also experienced a higher reduction of crime rate, while not introducing any gun-control, and without any spike. The amount of gun ownership in Australia is now at the same level as before the ban. So gun ownership and crime are not correlated. The buyback didn't even manage to obtain 30% of the targeted weapons in the country and the total cost was over half a billion dollars, with that money Australians could have gotten way better things for the police. Massacres also kept happening at the same rate as before, just no gun-related. Want sources?
Shakti Kareen "Massacres also kept happening at the same rate as before, just no gun-related."
In the 19 years prior to the gun buyback, there were 14 massacres in Australia, with 114 people killed. In the 19 years since the buyback, there have been 9 massacres, with 62 people killed. In other words, there has been a nearly 50% reduction in the number of people killed in massacres in Australia.
"So gun ownership and crime are not correlated."
Seriously? Most developed countries, like the UK, Australia and Canada experience at most 1 or 2 mass killings a year. The United States experiences one almost every day. The vast majority of massacres in the US are committed with firearms. You seriously think that that has nothing to do with the fact that it's exceedingly difficult to get hold of a handgun, or a semi-automatic gun, in those other countries, whereas in the US everyone, even criminals and mentally ill people, have easy access to firearms?
something name True, but a schizophrenic can't kill rooms filled with kids with one knife
@@webdesignerguy America saw similar declines as Australia yet we didn't implement Australian gun controls. U.S. saw a more drastic reduction in homicides than Australia did.
www.gunfacts.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/GUNS-IN-OTHER-COUNTRIES-Australia-and-U.S.-homicides-rates-before-and-after-Australia-gun-ban.png
he dug a hole for himself there
hearing almost one a year being considered as a lot of mass shootings is almost shocking
You can't make this stuff up!
'Onya Australia!
Meanwhile I weep for the USA, and the innocent students here that continue to lose their lives. What a tragic loss
9 years later and this comedy has turned into a tragedy. And not just for John Oliver's hair.
It’s was a tragedy in 1999 Columbine High School massacre and than sandy hook elementary school
Whoop-de-fuckin-Didger-i-Doo!!! ;)
That argument at 3:58 was so perfect, he couldn't have planned it. If I were him I'd still be thinking about that zinger to this day
Almost like we already have 22000 gun laws on the books.
To paraphrase this gun clown, "dur tekk meh gun en meh buybull"
On a side note, youtube put an NRA ad next to this video... lol smh
Bacoo180 companies like Google and Facebook should drop their adds and dissociate themselves from the nra
When adblock is the strongest gun control measure you can get.
@@IlyaKokoev What about the NFA?
At 4:04 I was legit afraid this guy would suddenly pull out his gun and blow John's brain out coz he was losing the argument
Yeah! Planet X!! Bring your hat and sunscreen kids!
Any restriction of the individual right to self defense is complicity with the attacker.
“Mass shootings are rare anyhow!” Pure comedy
"Right." "Right." "...Right." lmao this is too much
"So if we can't completely get rid of drugs, there shouldn't be gun laws?"
"...Let me think about it"
"Even their animals can holster weapons." 😂
john oliver and jim jeffries. two foreign comedians doing an amazing job of smacking pro gun Americans over the head with their own stupidity. i love it.
You're forgetting about how Sacha Baron Cohen exposed this particular lunatic on his Showtime series "This Is America". He made certain that *no one* will have to listen and/or see this dolt ever again.
Jim wrote his own jokes thou. Performed them on stage. He wasn’t given a script to read.
@@JuICyBLiinGeR you realize John Oliver stated as a stand-up comic, was a writer for the daily show with John Stewart, and is the head writer on last week tonight... right?
ruclips.net/video/XbkNIoJ-9jY/видео.html
Just throwing this out there
Govern me harder daddy!!
So, was Philip Van Cleave in on the joke? Or were his responses genuinely that stupid?
+RyanX1231 Nope he was not in on the joke. Google him, the daily show actually spent a segment on all of the crazy people they had on proving that it was for real. People kept asking the same question as you do :P
Tom Geurken Thanks for clarifying. I was unsure because I know that The Daily Show leans very left and most of the jokes and skits involve making jokes at the expense of Republicans (which is funny because the people they make fun of are stupid). So I was unsure if this skit was heavily edited to take what these people said out of context, or if they somehow got these people to play up their views.
Tom Geurken i'm late to this but do you know where to find this segment
RyanX1231 leans left or just making sense on how things are?
In Australia their homicide rate actually went up. Also it was a blanket ban, which would require seizing 300 million+ guns, which will not ever happen. They also fail to mention that Australia's suicide rate had been declining for 10 years prior and showed no major decrease with the ban.
Leftists "think" that just because we live in the future and it ain't 1776 anymore, we don't need a firearm, and they "think" the government is out there to serve the public.
+Joey Zasa Well make sure the government doesn't have nuclear weapons that can obliterate the entire American population. Make sure the government doesn't spend more than the next 6 nations combined as well. The conservatives lost against the 1863 U.S. military, which was much weaker than the 21st century U.S. military. Do you really think the conservatives won't lose again?
10 years later and nothing has changed.
My gawd, this is FUCKING Whoopdy doo hilarious!!! Sort it Murica!!
There are three things i love in this word, guns. freedom, and the freedom to have my guns
nick panayiotou How about the opportunity to have a 3rd world homicide rate and ever increasing mass shootings?
ratofvengence Obviously one causes the other because there's never high amount of crime or mass killings where they restrict guns, oh wait no, that's not true at all and you know that.
Look at Mexico, Brazil and Honduras.
crazypants88 I guess you have a memory problem, because I have educated you on this before. Obviously Mexico, Brazil and Honduras have much more significant problems with poverty, inequity and corrupt govt/policing. Again, this is obvious. It is also obvious, to all but you of course, that comparing those nations to the US or Australia is inane. Yes, look at Mexico, Brazil and Honduras. See how they are NOT valid comparisons.
Did you get it this time?
+nick panayiotou Inside every liberal is a tyrant screaming to get out.
Try interviewing Honduras, Mexico, and, conveniently, France today. Let's you laugh afterwards.
+XxGR3YW01FxX
whats your pont? mexicans are allowed to have guns and they are fucking miserable
france has strict gun laws and is doing fine oO
if you want to aim at the paris attacks, less gunlaws wouldnt have prevented them. does 9/11 ring a bell?
USA has 30+ people killed by a gun every day. thats one paris massacre every 4 days!
in other words since the attacks only few days ago the usa had their own little massacre and you keep promoting guns?! xD
whoop de fucking doooo
+Bobbin McBong *citation needed. It is illegal to own a gun in Mexico, the people who do have them are the criminals and incompetent police. Plus real smooth coming at Mexico on how miserable they are. They are not the ones with the 2nd highest anti-depressant drug consumption, it's Australia so "whoop dee fucking doo" to you back "mate". U.S. crime in general is higher in the plaves where they don't have guns or have been outlawed. That's where all the mass shootings happen you dunce. And please tell how is 9/11 is compared to a common thug/psycho walking into a building with a gun to spray down dozens of unarmed civilians. That my friend is over exaggeration for compensation to the lack of merit your points have. I could say the same about atomic bomb in Japan in ww2. As a matter of fact the only reason the Americans, not the Australians "whoop dee fucking doo", is because of the civilian armed rebellion the US discovered was being assembled in Japan's major cities. You have no merit to push gun control, plus it's not like Australia is much of a paradise either regardless. Just ask any bloke who has to live closer to the middle of the country. "Whoop dee fucking doo" you dunce. LOL
XxGR3YW01FxX
"A common misconception is that firearms are illegal in Mexico and that no person may possess them.[3] This belief originates due the general perception that only members of law enforcement, the armed forces, or those in armed security protection are authorized to have them. While it is true that Mexico possesses strict gun laws,[4] where most types and calibers are reserved to military and law enforcement, the acquisition and ownership of certain firearms and ammunition remains a constitutional right to all Mexican citizens and foreign legal residents"
whoop de fucking dooooooooo again xD
"That's where all the mass shootings happen" no they happen fucking everywhere, because every nutsack can grab a gun in no time
+Bobbin McBong "While it is true that Mexico has strict gun restrictions..." "owning certain firearms and ammunition remains a constitutional right" I presume because of hunting, sounds like the UK, coincidentally gun free and crime risen. You made no point here, you proved me right. How is a shitty small cal. rifle of about .223 going to stop the cartel? Russia also has strict gun control, still pretty drunkenly crime ridden, literally. And if you want to incorporate history then sure the experts agree, gun control works (Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Kim Jong Un/Il, even the Confederacy with African Americans, pretty much every radical psycho trying to oppress a country). I've kicked plenty of people's asses over gun control and you are just another statistic to my RUclips debate body count "whoop dee fucking doo".
P.S. Proof read your sources before using them and quit with the silly emoticons, unless you don't want me to take you seriously.
P.P.S. "Whoop dee fucking doo".
XxGR3YW01FxX
Your RUclips Bodycount?! xD
You lost EVERY agrument and stil think you have won the debate?!? that explains everything xDDDDDDDD EMOOOTICOOONS
I love how he provided John's argument for him.
Johns point about drugs at 4:00 is spot on! and it applies to guns at well
Still more than relevant. Especially today
“We don’t do background checks for the first amendment”
That logic tho...
"mass shootings are rare anyhow" five years later its basically one every month.......
www.gunviolencearchive.org/ it's pretty much at least once a day.. 'mass shooting' now is like 10+ instead of just 4+ injured/killed by a gun during a single incident
homania only 123 people died in mass shootings in 2019
Homemade Tech that’s still 123 to many
Egg Lasagna people will kill one another no matter what. Compare those deaths to the 245 knife killings in the UK (much smaller country). We may have some shooting issues, but we most certainly don’t have a mass shooting problem or epidemic
Homemade Tech actually we do we have more mass shootings then almost any other country and I’m pretty sure a gun dose a lot more damage a lot quicker then a knife, also don’t you think one mass school shooting is to much or do you just care more about guns then you do innocent human lives? I’m really not trying to sound rude but you can’t ignore that shootings are a real problem in America. I personally don’t think we should get rid of all guns but I think their needs to be more regulations so that it isn’t so easy for people to get their hands on them. And like a said before its still 123 to many people dying for no reason, I’m really not trying to argue so I mean no disrespect to you but you can’t ignore that this is a real problem that we need to fix so our country can be as amazing as possible! (Sorry for any spelling or grammar mistakes typing this out fast lol)
This video becomes even more relevant as the days go on
#HaveAWank
Lon Chaney Fan Stop procrastinating
rock_lobsterrr85 Videos dropping from above like bird poo...
Ironically gun control might have helped him from when he shot himself in the foot about drug laws
This seriously is one of my favourite pieces !!!
Looks like another whoop-de-doo in Texas
Might have worked for Australia, but just look at Mexico....
"So we should not make a law that may or may not fix our Dystopic future to save our actual Distopic present" - John Stewart.
Tony M is a developing nation with corruption issues, the laws that they have are poorly enforced and they are right next to a major arms supplier.
ruofan1982 They don't even report on all the drive by shootings in the US, especially if not many people, or any, are hit like in Western Sydney.
ABC is turning off comments on all their videos.
ruofan1982 You are making a conspiracy out of nothing. I checked channel 7 and 9 official youtube channels and comments were not blocked even on news stories about gang shootings.
Channel 10, SBS, and ABC seemed to have comments blocked on all videos, as in all of the videos uploaded onto the channels. Not sure why.
CorporateEvolution
hi there, thanks for taking time and looking for truth.
sorry I didn't know channel 10, SBS, and ABC actually block comments on -ALL VIDEOS. I mostly check on videos about sydney shooting, war in Afghanistan， and seem to me they always block comment. you have explained the reason. and I was mistaken.
sorry for the false information. I am very embarrassed and thanks again for correcting me.
I think we can safely assume 10 years from now nothing has changed. Aside from the lives of thousands of future parents who lost their kids of course.
Hey, it's that guy who advocates giving rocket launchers to toddlers.
There's a sentence that I never could have imagined myself writing.
What happened to blunt object and knife homicides and suicides after gun control in Australia?
up like crazy they are just like cnn..........FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!
nite watchman Can't you kill more people at ounce with a gun?
@@EmilioReyes_97 The NICE attack used a Truck and it killed roughly the same amount of people compared to a guy with like 20 rifles in 5 minutes compared to 10 minutes.
@@1911GreaterThanALL yes.....of course running over a group of people with people is gonna be just as bloody as with a gun. But who the fuck thinks to use a truck as their default murder weapon?
@@nitewatchman1576 Incorrect. Suicides overall went down after gun control possibly because a majority of people change their mind about suicide partway through if the act takes more than an instant to happen - gun suicides are far quicker and more deadly than other forms so give no opportunity for the victims to change their mind.
Homicides overall didn't change significantly, same for all other types of violent crime. Mass-murders went down as other weapons are generally not as effective as guns at mass-murder.
PS as for cars, obviously it would be ideal to pedestrianise areas where large crowds are common to reduce the danger but unlike guns cars serve a very important function to society, whereas guns are a form of entertainment. If/when someone comes up with a way to use commercial "drones" for mass-murder I fully expect them to be banned/regulated as well.
*Cough Switzerland
+XxGR3YW01FxX
switzerland has strict gun laws, registration and backgroundchecks.
im glad that you also support that :)
+Bobbin McBong That's what gun advocates are pushing for you dunce. A system in which they are able to own a gun while at the same time preventing those with a criminal background or history of mental illness from obtaining a gun. I don't know much about the history of Australia but the only reason America, a nation far economically and socially superior to Australia "whoop dee fucking doo", was able to become a nation is exactly because of NOT having gun control. Better to have one and not need one than need one and not have one. If you were stuck in a room with 4 other guys that had guns, would you want to be the only one without a gun? Challenge your instincts and then you'll see. The majority of people who die by guns are those without gubs, don't forget that either, that could potentially any Australian tourist visiting a gun free zone in the US "whoop dee fucking doo".
XxGR3YW01FxX
If you were stuck in a room with 4 other guys that had guns, would you want to be the only one without a gun?
no i would want everyone to throw their gun away and live a happy life xD
rekt youtube bodycount rising once again trololol
+Bobbin McBong That is just what Ghandi said until he was dispatched. Why do trolls always think "trololo" magically wins an argument? It doesn't. Like I said before: You laughing harder at an argument doesn't make you less wrong or your opponent less right. You're embarrassing yourself, unless of course you never had a valid argument to begin with that wasn't torn apart by gun advocates multiple times, myself included. You know you're losing it if you joke more than you argue. Aside from that you still haven't proven or countered anything I addressed besides Mexico in which you pretty much ruined for yourself.
Cough
45/100 people with a gun
USA 88/100 with a gun
Cough USA 900,000 shootings since 2005
Cough 300,000 homicide since 2005
USA is a fucking mess and you are the reason so many kids are dying. You're a disgrace to humanity
Oh shit, that's the guy from #WhoIsAmerica !
First thing that came to my mind when I saw it.
This was in my recommended today in 2019, I must have somehow missed this segment the first time around, glad youtube found it for me.