None, they’re all hustlers for your money. I purchase a $19.99 a month premium subscription from a tout. Same results as the free pics. I track the games from last Thursday to this Wed only two wins rest all losses. 7 days 2 wins 5 losses. These were premium pics.😅😅
I think sports can be beat, but it's much harder to do than say twenty years ago. Just like poker, you have to constantly evolve. What works one season will fail another if you don't constantly learn and sadly--unlike poker--there's very few successful bettors willing to share their secrets. I'm sure you know who Dink was...he said there *are* some people on twitter/forums worth following. What people can't understand is it is very possible for a winning bettor to have a losing week, month or even season, but people cluster around the hot hand and then get hit with regression to the mean. Watched it many times.
You arent wrong but in my opinion the constantly moving target makes the juice not worth the squeeze, especially with how hard it is to obtain data these days
Actually it’s simply not true that sports betting is harder to beat than 20 years ago. It’s easier to win than 20 years ago. However that’s if you bet on the easiest markets to beat which is long term markets. Futures as the Americans call them. And the main reason they’re easier to beat is because there’s more of them
I will say that the person who said they're sharing picks to build a community could be accurate. That's what I was doing last year. The key to that is that I (and perhaps they, if it's an 'innocent' person) was a relative beginner who had just found their edge, so I didn't really grasp the risk of exposing it, nor did I realise just how profitable it would be (and that I should hide it as much as possible to keep it as lucrative as possible). I no longer give out free picks, and just use my edge myself. I imagine that if they are legit and innocent, and they do actually have an edge that they manage to maintain in the long term, they'll eventually do the same.
I don't agree with everything you say. But I appreciate your adherence to honesty, and integrity at all times. You seem like a genuinely good person despite having horrible political views in my opinion.
Hey, will you should check out a video with spencer cornelia called “ infiltrating a sports gambling operation”. If you do check it out…are they considered sharps?
They are sharps; one key thing is that they're not selling their picks and are staying mostly under the radar (for example, even in those videos you can't really identify them or track them down). Having to use multiple accounts to place bets is another key sign that they're sharp (having to use that as a workaround, and being limited so frequently).
@@Thebigshort08 Well, yeah...? A sharp is just a bettor that makes sharp picks; essentially a bettor with an edge. How they get that edge is going to differ from bettor to bettor. For me personally, I have a model that picks basketball stats. In regards to that group and those Spencer videos, I can't 100% remember how much of their own methods they talked about, but I do recall them getting information about an injury before it was widely known (so they got a line at good value as that info hadn't been incorporated into it yet), and they also talked about a years-ago method they had used where they could get info about whether or not a free throw would be successful, before the local sportsbook did, and could live bet it while knowing the result - or something like that. People find their edges in different ways.
None, they’re all hustlers for your money. I purchase a $19.99 a month premium subscription from a tout. Same results as the free pics. I track the games from last Thursday to this Wed only two wins rest all losses. 7 days 2 wins 5 losses. These were premium pics.😅😅
I think sports can be beat, but it's much harder to do than say twenty years ago. Just like poker, you have to constantly evolve. What works one season will fail another if you don't constantly learn and sadly--unlike poker--there's very few successful bettors willing to share their secrets. I'm sure you know who Dink was...he said there *are* some people on twitter/forums worth following. What people can't understand is it is very possible for a winning bettor to have a losing week, month or even season, but people cluster around the hot hand and then get hit with regression to the mean. Watched it many times.
You arent wrong but in my opinion the constantly moving target makes the juice not worth the squeeze, especially with how hard it is to obtain data these days
Actually it’s simply not true that sports betting is harder to beat than 20 years ago. It’s easier to win than 20 years ago. However that’s if you bet on the easiest markets to beat which is long term markets. Futures as the Americans call them. And the main reason they’re easier to beat is because there’s more of them
I will say that the person who said they're sharing picks to build a community could be accurate. That's what I was doing last year. The key to that is that I (and perhaps they, if it's an 'innocent' person) was a relative beginner who had just found their edge, so I didn't really grasp the risk of exposing it, nor did I realise just how profitable it would be (and that I should hide it as much as possible to keep it as lucrative as possible).
I no longer give out free picks, and just use my edge myself. I imagine that if they are legit and innocent, and they do actually have an edge that they manage to maintain in the long term, they'll eventually do the same.
I don't agree with everything you say. But I appreciate your adherence to honesty, and integrity at all times. You seem like a genuinely good person despite having horrible political views in my opinion.
well
there re profitable cappers
but you re too lazy to search and find them
.
you re not good at your job mate
You should @ them buddy .
shill
Totally agree my friend.
I'm assuming Mazi VS is a tout, he's been getting alot of coverage and social media traction, anyone have any experience with him?
Maaaaan, I bet these ppl dt even bet on these games themselves, but toss them to you. I would never pay for a pick.
Hey, will you should check out a video with spencer cornelia called “ infiltrating a sports gambling operation”. If you do check it out…are they considered sharps?
They are sharps; one key thing is that they're not selling their picks and are staying mostly under the radar (for example, even in those videos you can't really identify them or track them down). Having to use multiple accounts to place bets is another key sign that they're sharp (having to use that as a workaround, and being limited so frequently).
@@jaxsonbateman as supposed to somebody that writes out there own model ?
@@Thebigshort08 What are you asking? Your question doesn't make sense.
There are different types of Sharps.
@@Thebigshort08 Well, yeah...? A sharp is just a bettor that makes sharp picks; essentially a bettor with an edge. How they get that edge is going to differ from bettor to bettor. For me personally, I have a model that picks basketball stats.
In regards to that group and those Spencer videos, I can't 100% remember how much of their own methods they talked about, but I do recall them getting information about an injury before it was widely known (so they got a line at good value as that info hadn't been incorporated into it yet), and they also talked about a years-ago method they had used where they could get info about whether or not a free throw would be successful, before the local sportsbook did, and could live bet it while knowing the result - or something like that.
People find their edges in different ways.
What about Ryan Bender? He sells a program called Masterclass. He’s the only one that seems legit to me. He’s not a Twitter guy though
Grifter
@furnacepicks
thoughts on oddsjam??
You should cover pickdawgz, they are on a hotstreak 105-33 for nba anf nfl combined
And*
Lol; isn't this the exact shilling he was talking about in the video? XD
Hahahaha.... been there, done that