Hey I'm the Nemleria replay guy! As others pointed out I couldn't have summoned droll since golem locks you out of normal summoning, but don't let that distract you from the fact that my list has 4 lines that small bridge into Lava Golem for some reason xD
Hi, I know it doesn’t change anything but on that lava golem kill, the player couldn’t have norm’d droll since golem prevents from normal summoning the turn you summon it on the opponent’s side
That Raigeki clip is one of the things I hate most with post POTE card design, anti interactive float effects. Basically archetypes where you try to interact with their cards but are punished for doing so. Once again thanks for nothing Tearlament and Konami
I do think POTE also introduced a cool concept that I believe Konami should’ve kept pushing and that’s the in archetype hand traps that don’t stop your opponent necessarily but allow you to start your plays on turn zero and also it’s a much more fun and interesting way to interact with your opponent then just discarding the hand trap imag the choke point you saw on a RUclips video
We need a raigeki that just banish all monsters :3 And when a meta archetype that has the same recursion from banishment, we need one that banishes face down :3
Shifter hurts non meta WAAAAAAAY more than it hurts meta decks because of either consistency problems or each individual card not having enough impact like look at that Snake Eyes player you ask yourself could Blue Eyes do that? It's not a strong deck but it's a deck that Shifter absolutely fucks sideways with a cactus covered in icy hot and capsaicin
@@yepyep86 the existence of outdated decks don't justify banning a card that puts a leash on the meta. Snake Eyes can't combo while everything is being banished, as all the out of board effects are from graveyard (Flamberge, Poplar and Promethean Princess, i.e.). Meta decks also can't really use shifter because they'd also hurt themselves, as its effects still linger on your own turn, and can't be activated if there's any card on your GY. Limiting it to 1 would make it hard to start with, making it way less toxic overall as you're not starting every duel with at least one on your hand, but would still make a big difference once you eventually start with it (and also lowering the chance of bricking your hand by drawing it/multiples at the wrong time)
There are too many floating effects and not enough restrictions in place on specific cards. You know, because who needs to be attribute/archetype locked when busted ass generic Link Monsters exist.
Exactly. I like using crystal beast and summoning rainbow dragon isnt exactly easy and then it cant even use its effects turn 1 lol. So many links barely have any restrictions literally at all and so many links can go with any deck by sending any mons.
1:39 - Since activated effects cannot be negated, effects can have their activation negated, so Apollousa would have worked, and Veiler was relevant. Also swole raging WHAT
Don't you mean wouldnt? Because Apoll negates the activation, Batcha woukdnt have been stopped by it because of the contract effect that stops your activated melodius effects from being negated, Veiled just negates the effects
@briantaylor3031 "while you control this FUSION SUMMONED CARD, the activated effects of your "Melodious" Fusion summoned monsters cannot be negated" "....you can make this card lose exactly 800 ATK and if you do, negate the activation." Batcha protects itself from Apollousa via its own effect because again, Negating Activation protections. Veiled just negates the effects, so it bypasses Batcha's protection
@@SuperSayianWarrior i don't get it either but appo *does* negate bacha. it happened a couple weeks back to me and i was so confused i immediately went to r/masterduel to ask, and their answers didn't really help clear it all the much to me
@@MiyaoMeow588 When Apollousa negates monster effect activations, it responds directly to the activated effect and is attempting to negate the activation of that activated effect. Bacha’s Continuous Effect the moment it hits the field stops “Melodious” monsters from having their activated effects negated, meaning that BOTH the effect of the activated effect and activation of the activated effect can’t be negated. This is why Apollousa does not negate the activation of Bacha’s effect EDIT: Also will add, Effect Veiler applies effect negation to an opponent’s monster rather than negating an effect directly in response to the activation of the effect like Apollousa, which is why cards like Effect Veiler and Infinite Impermanence are able to negate Bacha’s effects
Problem with powerful decks is that horrible players are allowed to use them making them. Decision making is just not there brain capacity isnt present its just sad watching some of these replays
wait bacha stops negates? thats the first time i hear of that but i guess every single good card that negates effects right now negates the entire effect of the card not just the activted
"While you control this Fusion Summoned card, the activated effects of your "Melodious" Fusion Monsters cannot be negated." first sentence on the card.
Modern yugioh, "bro played a card, you shouldn't try to play the game my friend, that's not how yugioh works". Lava Golem is based not gonna lie. It's super old a super balanced card. Yeah it's a burn card, and easily handled especially now with link summons. But even back in the day it was still a 3000 beater. So even without the easy outs to it nowadays it was still a threat. But I really can't stand how modern yugioh has cards that say "your opponent does literally anything but pass turn, do X,Y,Z. Like boss stage... opponent conduct draw phase which is mandatory, summon some bullshit from the deck, also here's a bunch of tokens for no reason so you can use their effects.
Its pronounced more like ostinaaahtoe, not the way u said it (idk how to type how u spoke, and i know I'm knit picking, might as well boost the algorithm while im being a yeah)
then people start hard quitting the game and meta player cries to ban stun cards, while you destoy 5 monster and and the chain resolve he still has 5 new monsters triggering their summon effect and triggering the ones going to the GY, but hey, stun is the real problem
@@MateusSoar I'm a ghoti player, I only middly care about shifter. Sometimes I also play metaphys/myutant (it's not good), a deck that is better under shifter. I play the damn thing and yet I want to see it banned because freely shutting off my opponent's entire gameplan is not fun.
some would say raikegi is the problem some would say a combo/board that plays through raikegi is the problem i say neither is but if one has to go then it is raigeki's time to retire
lol old yugioh is way better than anything modern. if combo decks don't go yugioh tournament matches shouldn't be timed. I shouldn't lose in time when I'm about to win because my opp takes 10+ min to combo. I could go on but yugioh is by far the worst card game to play out of all the tcgs.
yeah, konami keeps contradicting themselves, they made dark ruler to counter combo, but now combo decks counter dark ruler, konami needs to make up their mind with which side they want to be better
Hey I'm the Nemleria replay guy! As others pointed out I couldn't have summoned droll since golem locks you out of normal summoning, but don't let that distract you from the fact that my list has 4 lines that small bridge into Lava Golem for some reason xD
Hi Nemleria guy
Couldnt opponent hsve actived grave effect to not take damage??
@@MrOreo-ey1lf he could have activated the book of moon in the end phase but the shock have its effect
@@MrOreo-ey1lf dinomorphia only protects from your opponent's burn effects
DistantCode : "Let Nemleria sleep"
Also DistantCoder : Screams in excitement.
Hi, I know it doesn’t change anything but on that lava golem kill, the player couldn’t have norm’d droll since golem prevents from normal summoning the turn you summon it on the opponent’s side
That Raigeki clip is one of the things I hate most with post POTE card design, anti interactive float effects. Basically archetypes where you try to interact with their cards but are punished for doing so. Once again thanks for nothing Tearlament and Konami
I do think POTE also introduced a cool concept that I believe Konami should’ve kept pushing and that’s the in archetype hand traps that don’t stop your opponent necessarily but allow you to start your plays on turn zero and also it’s a much more fun and interesting way to interact with your opponent then just discarding the hand trap imag the choke point you saw on a RUclips video
@@TheFrozen_Aba sure, commie deck, lets play on both turn with cards that keep coming back again and again and again.....
We need a raigeki that just banish all monsters :3 And when a meta archetype that has the same recursion from banishment, we need one that banishes face down :3
@@leonelmerad4612 evenly matches....
@ I mean yea it was some of the most fun I’ve had playing the game was against those decks that could play on both turns
Dimensional Fissure and then Raigeki. I wanna see the opponent activate anything from his Graveyard now lmao
This is why shifter must never be banned.
@@konstantinoskoutlas7608 nah, shifter helps keeps dumb decks in check, limit to 1 and it's fine.
@@MixedSnowFox nah. Always at 3. Dumb decks = every deck.
Shifter hurts non meta WAAAAAAAY more than it hurts meta decks because of either consistency problems or each individual card not having enough impact like look at that Snake Eyes player you ask yourself could Blue Eyes do that? It's not a strong deck but it's a deck that Shifter absolutely fucks sideways with a cactus covered in icy hot and capsaicin
@@yepyep86 the existence of outdated decks don't justify banning a card that puts a leash on the meta. Snake Eyes can't combo while everything is being banished, as all the out of board effects are from graveyard (Flamberge, Poplar and Promethean Princess, i.e.).
Meta decks also can't really use shifter because they'd also hurt themselves, as its effects still linger on your own turn, and can't be activated if there's any card on your GY.
Limiting it to 1 would make it hard to start with, making it way less toxic overall as you're not starting every duel with at least one on your hand, but would still make a big difference once you eventually start with it (and also lowering the chance of bricking your hand by drawing it/multiples at the wrong time)
There are too many floating effects and not enough restrictions in place on specific cards.
You know, because who needs to be attribute/archetype locked when busted ass generic Link Monsters exist.
Exactly. I like using crystal beast and summoning rainbow dragon isnt exactly easy and then it cant even use its effects turn 1 lol. So many links barely have any restrictions literally at all and so many links can go with any deck by sending any mons.
Here's a fun fact from me and my experience:
I stopped playing competively in 2014.
I now only ever play it casually.
"Good luck non-targeting non-destroying these monsters."
*Laughs in Tiaramisu*
*Laughs in Jormungandr post effect of Laevatein*
Sir, a second Raigeki hit the board.
1:39 - Since activated effects cannot be negated, effects can have their activation negated, so Apollousa would have worked, and Veiler was relevant.
Also swole raging WHAT
It's always the third Raigeki that gets you...
That lava golem pass was hands down the best replay I've seen in quite a while xD
This is just where we at, we prefer watching the game more than playing it cuz playing it is such a headache .
What about 2nd Raigeki?
Just makes me think of Madara's meteors.
"genuinely well played duel!"
Duelist: *Literally misplays with his first combo*
Coder, if that was well played Melodious would have won it sooner.
There used to be a stipulation to prevent this. "except the turn it is sent there"
If there is one thing I like about VV it's that I don't need to dismantle a Snake Eyes board in order to OTK them thanks to their influx of monsters
9:09 made me choke on my dinner lol
Apollousa negates activations, so Bacha would have been negated.
Don't you mean wouldnt? Because Apoll negates the activation, Batcha woukdnt have been stopped by it because of the contract effect that stops your activated melodius effects from being negated, Veiled just negates the effects
@@SuperSayianWarriornegating the activation isn't the same as negating the effect. The activation of the eff would be negated by apollousa.
@briantaylor3031 "while you control this FUSION SUMMONED CARD, the activated effects of your "Melodious" Fusion summoned monsters cannot be negated"
"....you can make this card lose exactly 800 ATK and if you do, negate the activation."
Batcha protects itself from Apollousa via its own effect because again, Negating Activation protections. Veiled just negates the effects, so it bypasses Batcha's protection
@@SuperSayianWarrior i don't get it either but appo *does* negate bacha. it happened a couple weeks back to me and i was so confused i immediately went to r/masterduel to ask, and their answers didn't really help clear it all the much to me
@@MiyaoMeow588 When Apollousa negates monster effect activations, it responds directly to the activated effect and is attempting to negate the activation of that activated effect. Bacha’s Continuous Effect the moment it hits the field stops “Melodious” monsters from having their activated effects negated, meaning that BOTH the effect of the activated effect and activation of the activated effect can’t be negated. This is why Apollousa does not negate the activation of Bacha’s effect
EDIT: Also will add, Effect Veiler applies effect negation to an opponent’s monster rather than negating an effect directly in response to the activation of the effect like Apollousa, which is why cards like Effect Veiler and Infinite Impermanence are able to negate Bacha’s effects
I love the MOO MOO meadow’s music! Love that Map
code: what is reading... truely
me: I'll tell you what it isn't knowing some people's ranks : *NECESSARY*
Melodious player and fire player were sooo bad
@distantcoder it’s Poplar like the tree, there’s no U. Ash is a tree,Oak is a tree, Poplar is a tree.
You miss the joke
@@xSoLxZEUSits not funny I guess 😅
"LET HER HUNG-SHOO, HUNG-SHOO IN PEACE!"
Lmfao! Brotheeerrrrrr!!!
And the thunder struck thrice my bois.
1:15 that board is correct. It has a lot more interruptions than you would think
Sometimes you need to shake the raigeki can and spray the bug twice before it dies
Apollousa can negate Bacha because it negates the activation of the effect, not the effect. Bacha only prevents effect negation
6:10-6:12 Aha! Can’t normal summon. i’m the greatest Yugioh mind ever. i definitely would make it as a judge. Mm-hmm.
What are you going to do about the 2nd Raigeki Onoki?
If you have to Raigeki multiple times to wipe their board, its time to play with someone else.
Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell is a way to handle 3 Raigeki decks.
Blizzard is better.
Wdym does he have guys for Draglubion? Jfyi Draglubion makes it that only the guy summoned from extra can attack. Someone forgot to READ
Problem with powerful decks is that horrible players are allowed to use them making them. Decision making is just not there brain capacity isnt present its just sad watching some of these replays
I still think even one Raigeki is excessive. Dark Hole does what you need and at least has a down side. We need to rethink cards if Raigeki is at 3.
Wait, i just realized but why are the snakes eyes cards named after trees?
Because they are spirits in the fire, hence being Pyro, and the wood name is the type of wood being burnt
No ya think ?
Appo negates activation, not activated effects, had this come up at ycs indy earlier this year, bacha would be negated by appo
Y'all should try 60 card White Forest Tear Horus, it somehow works
Lmao horus control Blue-Eyes > snake eyes
That's gotta be that guys biggest L of his career
Imagine thinking in Yu-Gi-Oh.
All the love for you coder
Laugh how people uses raigeki but has soon i use it bam negate it straight but has soon i negate theres bam they negate my negate
how come you don't show chat anymore
Easy madolche doesnt target or destroy it just shuffles two for two
wait bacha stops negates? thats the first time i hear of that but i guess every single good card that negates effects right now negates the entire effect of the card not just the activted
"While you control this Fusion Summoned card, the activated effects of your "Melodious" Fusion Monsters cannot be negated." first sentence on the card.
@@callmeriggy the point when i played it for the first time i already knew all it is meant to do so i guess yugioh players really don't ever read
Yugioh has a power problem! Part 1,000
How do we send replays?
u have to ask on his twitch when he's on, twitch.tv/distantcoder
Modern yugioh, "bro played a card, you shouldn't try to play the game my friend, that's not how yugioh works". Lava Golem is based not gonna lie. It's super old a super balanced card. Yeah it's a burn card, and easily handled especially now with link summons. But even back in the day it was still a 3000 beater. So even without the easy outs to it nowadays it was still a threat. But I really can't stand how modern yugioh has cards that say "your opponent does literally anything but pass turn, do X,Y,Z. Like boss stage... opponent conduct draw phase which is mandatory, summon some bullshit from the deck, also here's a bunch of tokens for no reason so you can use their effects.
Why call Poplar Popular?
I cant tell if its being lazy or not it seems like extra work to say popular over poplar its not an abbreviation
Maybe try rush duel on edopro
Raigeki to 4
Electrumite to 4
Yeah, put maxx “c” to 12 while you’re at it- oh…
Its pronounced more like ostinaaahtoe, not the way u said it (idk how to type how u spoke, and i know I'm knit picking, might as well boost the algorithm while im being a yeah)
then people start hard quitting the game and meta player cries to ban stun cards, while you destoy 5 monster and and the chain resolve he still has 5 new monsters triggering their summon effect and triggering the ones going to the GY, but hey, stun is the real problem
Stun defenders are so pathetic that they defend their deck when they're not even mentionned lmao
@@Luminos974 my fav deck is cydra and unchained, barely play stun, just dont cry when i see shifter or other floodgate
@@MateusSoarhe's not saying you're a "stun player" bro 😂😂😂 read again
Stun stands be like: Albion Lock is fair, deal with It casual player
@@MateusSoar I'm a ghoti player, I only middly care about shifter. Sometimes I also play metaphys/myutant (it's not good), a deck that is better under shifter. I play the damn thing and yet I want to see it banned because freely shutting off my opponent's entire gameplan is not fun.
some would say raikegi is the problem
some would say a combo/board that plays through raikegi is the problem
i say neither is but if one has to go then it is raigeki's time to retire
lol old yugioh is way better than anything modern. if combo decks don't go yugioh tournament matches shouldn't be timed. I shouldn't lose in time when I'm about to win because my opp takes 10+ min to combo. I could go on but yugioh is by far the worst card game to play out of all the tcgs.
yeah, konami keeps contradicting themselves, they made dark ruler to counter combo, but now combo decks counter dark ruler, konami needs to make up their mind with which side they want to be better
1st for the first time in my life.