THE VOICE appears to be an introduction, not a comclusion. Here follows a few lines out of the very extensive and detailed studies done by Marthe Lauverjon. They are about 'animist', more or less influenced populations, facing rural, social, legislative, economical and religious hurdles. Racial, religious, endoctrinating, academic, ideological, esoteric prejudices have masked the potential of an Australian Tradition, within Australia. If widening boderless concepts are helpful, roots of non partisan solutions can be based within adopted parameters. Visions from outsiders have more chances in being remote from passionate debates that alter a neutral pragmatism and the mutual respect required. What we can see as religious or Spiritual contents of Aboriginal, also called First Nation People,have been ignored. The aim is to bring further to light the importance of the topics mentioned here, so they get followed up in professional consultative ways, and made available and accessible to the Public. Arts, not just words, are to be associated with such a task, being careful not to overstate Western views. We are standing on an edge, either going towards Humanism or robitisation, the later being a science overtaking Humanism, and not taking into accounts the wider and detailed capacities of Nature, which is the earthen language of Universal Values (as demonstrated by DNA Science). A consistant non partisan approach can turn this work into an Australian anthology. The participants should actually aim at disappearing behind expressed realities on the ground. Without respect, interpreters and understanding, Elders cannot be heard: understanding requires exposure, not just on purely academic or political stands.Those ruling intend to be attached to their own values and logistics which is altogether necessary and a major hurdle in 'scientific' non partisan studies. In depths reports reduce drastically costly trials and errors associated with quickly pushing through Legislations set in concrete. Reminder: bridging is about having footings on both sides. Inspired by the Work of Marthe Lauverjon Anthropologist and Lawyer based in Africa.
A GLOBAL STEP AHEAD? FIRST NATION PEOPLE What follows is from Google: the appellation Indians came from a confusion, and, from what I hear, the America first People did not like the concept which was changed to FIRST NATION PEOPLE. It so happened, associated with a globalising effort, stipulating that it is more accurate to call Aboriginal People First Nation People AS IF ALL NATIVE CULTURES ONLY HAD AND HAVE ONE VOICE. The Voice is an insult to the past, present and future and very much part of the woke syndrome! Waking up is wOking out! American Indians - Native Americans The term "Indian," in reference to the original inhabitants of the American continent, is said to derive from Christopher Columbus, a 15th century boat-person. Some say he used the term because he was convinced he had arrived in "the Indies" (Asia), his intended destination.
THE VOICE appears to be an introduction, not a comclusion.
Here follows a few lines out of the very extensive and detailed studies done by Marthe Lauverjon.
They are about 'animist', more or less influenced populations, facing rural, social, legislative, economical and religious hurdles.
Racial, religious, endoctrinating, academic, ideological, esoteric prejudices have masked the potential of an Australian Tradition, within Australia.
If widening boderless concepts are helpful, roots of non partisan solutions can be based within adopted parameters.
Visions from outsiders have more chances in being remote from passionate debates that alter a neutral pragmatism and the mutual respect required. What we can see as religious or Spiritual contents of Aboriginal, also called First Nation People,have been ignored. The aim is to bring further to light the importance of the topics mentioned here, so they get followed up in professional consultative ways, and made available and accessible to the Public. Arts, not just words, are to be associated with such a task, being careful not to overstate Western views.
We are standing on an edge, either going towards Humanism or robitisation, the later being a science overtaking Humanism, and not taking into accounts the wider and detailed capacities of Nature, which is the earthen language of Universal Values (as demonstrated by DNA Science). A consistant non partisan approach can turn this work into an Australian anthology. The participants should actually aim at disappearing behind expressed realities on the ground. Without respect, interpreters and understanding, Elders cannot be heard: understanding requires exposure, not just on purely academic or political stands.Those ruling intend to be attached to their own values and logistics which is altogether necessary and a major hurdle in 'scientific' non partisan studies. In depths reports reduce drastically costly trials and errors associated with quickly pushing through Legislations set in concrete. Reminder: bridging is about having footings on both sides.
Inspired by the Work of Marthe Lauverjon
Anthropologist and Lawyer based in Africa.
Tribal dribble.
A GLOBAL STEP AHEAD?
FIRST NATION PEOPLE
What follows is from Google: the appellation Indians came from a confusion, and, from what I hear, the America first People did not like the concept which was changed to FIRST NATION PEOPLE.
It so happened, associated with a globalising effort, stipulating that it is more accurate to call Aboriginal People First Nation People AS IF ALL NATIVE CULTURES ONLY HAD AND HAVE ONE VOICE.
The Voice is an insult to the past, present and future and very much part of the woke syndrome!
Waking up is wOking out!
American Indians - Native Americans
The term "Indian," in reference to the original inhabitants of the American continent, is said to derive from Christopher Columbus, a 15th century boat-person. Some say he used the term because he was convinced he had arrived in "the Indies" (Asia), his intended destination.