HOKA Mach X 2 Review | Perfect, Except for One Thing

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • Today, the Fleet Feet Review team shares their thoughts on a completely redesigned popular uptempo, train-to-race shoe: the HOKA Mach X 2.
    The midsole gets a higher stack with a lot more PEBA foam and uses two compounds: a supercritical foam (seen in the Mach 6) on the bottom and a dramatically peppier PEBA foam on top for a dynamic underfoot feel. The PEBAX plate has been extended for more propulsion and the upper gets a significant update with a sleeker, more see-through construction for better breathability and weight reduction.
    Connect with Fleet Feet:
    Blog ➡ www.fleetfeet.com/blog
    RUclips ➡ / @fleetfeet699
    Instagram ➡ fleetfeetsports
    Facebook ➡ fleetfeet
    Strava ➡ www.strava.com/clubs/fleet-feet-571836
    TikTok ➡ / fleetfeetsports
    Rewards ➡ fleetfeet.com/rewards

Комментарии • 17

  • @SteveSpeirs
    @SteveSpeirs 5 дней назад

    Heel rubbing for me too. Using Compeed blister pads to avoid the friction at the moment. Other than the blister issue, loving the shoe!

  • @danielamos672
    @danielamos672 Месяц назад +5

    Huge fan of the Hyperion Max 2. How does this compare?

    • @berthein5476
      @berthein5476 Месяц назад +1

      this is bascially the little brother to the cielo x1. galaxies ahead of anything brooks. DNA flash is boring and harsh, whilst hoka is bouncy and has a ton of energy return. its alive, and responsive.

    • @bambaklats2891
      @bambaklats2891 Месяц назад +2

      ​​@@berthein5476 based on? All my HOKA's are retired, they go dead so fast, atkeast for the road models. The Hyperion is still alive and kicking afted 300k.

    • @novawolverine
      @novawolverine Месяц назад

      ⁠​⁠@@bambaklats2891 It’s probably based on most reviews which say it’s on the firmer side (firmer than the Boston 12 and others) and wants you to run fast. It’s a different sensation than most super trainers and most people’s praise for the Hyperion Max 2 has to do with it’s upper, rocker, aesthetics, and plate and less to do with its foam which may be better than before but not among the best yet.

  • @Maochan81
    @Maochan81 Месяц назад +1

    I hope the bottom is SC EVA. I won't pay 190 for standard EVA in the midsole...

    • @MrVanre
      @MrVanre Месяц назад

      way overpriced, there are better shoes on the market;

  • @i.p2088
    @i.p2088 Месяц назад +1

    I find the Cielo X1 toebox perfect. Mach 6 even in wide was not wide enough... Torpedo shape.. How is the toebox?

    • @fleetfeet699
      @fleetfeet699  Месяц назад +1

      I had no issues with the toe box. Fit my foot nicely - Brandon

  • @vtru2743
    @vtru2743 Месяц назад +1

    This vs the Superblast and Neo Vista in terms of ride and comfort?

    • @fleetfeet699
      @fleetfeet699  Месяц назад +1

      Firmer and more aggressive than the Neo Vista! - Brandon

  • @femaciel
    @femaciel Месяц назад +1

    Same bottom SCEVA from Mach 6? Mach 6 is just waay too narrow, even a half size up

    • @fleetfeet699
      @fleetfeet699  Месяц назад +1

      There is also PEBA and a PEBAX plate in the midsole! - Brandon

  • @brand0nahue
    @brand0nahue 10 дней назад

    How would you choose between this and the cielo x1? I’m after a fast trainer I can wear into my first proper fast half marathon

    • @fleetfeet699
      @fleetfeet699  4 дня назад

      The Cielo X 1 is bouncier and has more of a rocker sensation while the Mach X 2 is faster and more aggressive. - Brandon

  • @TheKingofGondor
    @TheKingofGondor Месяц назад

    How does this compare to the speed 4?

  • @Nextman916
    @Nextman916 12 дней назад

    Greetings fleet feet team! I know you guys are trying with the reviews but I don’t think this format is the most entertaining. It seems like you’re just essentially summarizing written reviews of other reviewers (who are faceless and lack context) with some inserts of your own opinion. I don’t think viewers here should have to go to the written review to try and contextual who every name dropped it and what kind of runner they are. Even then it’s just a name written on paper and highly depersonalized. If you guys can’t centralize filming, I’d suggest doing some sort of compilation video of all the reviewers either streamed together I.E. DoR or separately recorded thoughts sewn together that way it doesn’t seem like a brief robotic recap of a written review. Written and yt are clearly different mediums. Not to be harsh, I’m sure you guys have a budget etc but I just feel you guys are such a big retailer and becoming an authority on entertainment in this review space is a missed opportunity. My 2 cents, rock on!