How We Nearly Lost A Third Shuttle | The Story Of Space Shuttle Atlantis | STS-27
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2020
- NASA: / nasa
The Space Archive: / @thespacearchive
This is the story of the space shuttle Atlantis on the STS-27 mission, now i know that this video is a bit different than what we usually do on this channel but ever since I was young the space shuttle has captivated me in a way that no other spacecraft has. 10 year old me was quite saddened to find out about the retirement of the space shuttle. I remember seeing the vehicles that was supposed to replace the space shuttle like the ares launch system and I just could not fathom why we were going back to a capsule from something as cool and majestic as the space shuttle. Even though the space shuttle was a product of the 1980s it looked futuristic. So yeah i have a soft spot for the space shuttle that's why I'm doing this video to look back at a little known sliver of space shuttle history.
On the second of december 1988, Space shuttle atlantis was on the pad the at launch complex 39B, ready to launch into space, but this mission was no ordinary mission, hidden in the payload bay of the shuttle was a top secret military satellite, well it was top secret at the time, now we know what the payload was, it was a Lacrosse surveillance satellite. It was part of a series of terrestrial radar imaging satellites. But at the time the existence of the satellite was not known to many and it was top secret. Secrecy was woven into this launch, the exact launch time was only made known 24 hours before the launch, all the software they used was classified. I imagine that tensions were high for this launch; this was only the second flight after the loss of the space shuttle challenger and NASA was taking no chances, They did not go ahead with a launch on the previous day as the weather was too unruly. But on the second of december everything looked good. Atlantis went through her go no go polls and all the trans oceanic landing sites were put on alert, sites ranging from airports in england to morocco to diego garcia in the indian ocean, just in case she needed to make an emergency landing should something go wrong.
At 9:30 am EST the main engines were lit and Atlantis started its journey to space. The launch went off without a hitch and the astronauts got to work. They used the space shuttles robotic arm to deploy the top secret satellite, but something went wrong and the crew had to do a secret space walk, to fix the issue, but the satellite was away and that was the end of that.
On the 3rd of december 1988 the crew awoke to some troubling news, Their launch had not been as perfect as they had thought. Review of the launch footage had shown that a bit of the Insulator on the right hand solid rocket booster had broken away and the footage also showed the debris impacting the fragile thermal protection system of Atlantis. If the heat shield was damaged there was no way that atlantis would survive the fiery re-entry into the earth's atmosphere. The crew decided to use the mechanical arm to visually inspect the thermal protection system of the TPS, they looked at the forward part of the payload bay near the nose on the starboard side, all looked well the panels were in place, nothing out of the ordinary. But when they got to the belly of the orbiter they looked on in horror. Let me quote an astronaut on board “We could see that at least one tile had been completely blasted from the fuselage,” hundreds of tiles had white scars on them indicating damage, the loss of one tile was probably survivable but they had no idea as to the full extent of the damage that their shuttle had taken. The arm could not be maneuvered to look at the leading edge of the wing, the area that experienced the most heating on reentry. Mission specialist Richard Mullane radios NASA and
![Rich Dunk (Ft. DaBaby) - BIG DAWG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pz2ewsSKAEM/mqdefault.jpg)
Cool. I was on console for that mission.
And they didn't learn from this issue and Columbia crew paid the price.
Just because something looks cool does not mean it makes sense. The Space Shuttle cost as much as a Saturn V to launch and was far more dangerous to the astronauts as evidenced by the 14 brave souls lost on the Shuttle. Going back to a capsule design made a lot of sense.
Space shuttle was cool, but sadly flawed. As proven it was too easy for total loss of crew and too many instances proving it was very vulnerable by design.
Had we lost Atlantis STS 27 (only the 2nd flight back after Challenger) that would have ended the Shuttle Program. Full stop. NASAs inability to take safety seriously would have been on display for all to see.
Sooo here's evidence that the foam insulation COULD cause serious damage, yet when a similar strike occurred to Columbia they did not think it was a problem??
The shuttle was a dangerous POS that cost more to fly than the rockets it replaced
“My last 60 seconds are going to be used to cus these bastards.” 10/10 this is the right response
One of the Shuttle astronauts give safety lectures. His theme was that cost and schedule over rode safety at NASA. Near the end of his talk that I attended, the event manage tried to stop his talk, explaining that he was over running the schedule. The manager was laughed out of the room and the astronaut's talk continued.
The shuttle was the most dangerous unsafe man rated space vehicle nasa ever used.
You left out why it happened to survive re-entry.
If we had lost STS-27, we would have only lost two Orbiters.
I was 12 years old in 1969 when my parents drove from Missouri to Florida for the Apollo 11 launch. The closest we could park was 7 miles away, were you to stretch your arm full length the rocket was about 1/4" tall between 2 fingers. When it was lit, it generated a roaring fireball and sound i remember to this day. VERY impressive for a little kid. I watched history being made!
"Why would we go back to capsules?"
We went back to capsules because hauling a giant plane into space everytime gets really, really expensive really fast. But I agree, it was a dope machine.
I remember the details of this, a 3 inch thick aluminum plate was all that was keeping the shuttle from melting down, at the landing the plate had melted and was only about a quarter of an inch thick. There was talk in aerospace circles how close they came to losing the mission. I had friends that worked for Grumman at the time. Statisticians said they would lose 1 out of every 60 missions ? forget the exact but I think, sadly the numbers bore truth.
I met Hoot Gibson last year, and asked him what he thought of the damage that occurred on his Atlantis flight, and he told me "My first thought was, 'we're dead'!"
I first read this mission story in Mike Mullane's autobiography, Riding Rockets. He was the MS responsible for the extendable arm, and was the one who called Houston to report the damaged tiles. They told them it wasn't anything to worry about, which Mullane thought "Did they think the white streaks were seagull sh*t?"
The damage was actually worse on this mission. The reason Columbia was destroyed was because its damage was on the wing, while Atlantis's damage was not on the wing. Plus, the missing tile on Atlantis was over a metal plate for an antenna, while there was nothing under the missing tile on Columbia.
We almost lost several due to the O-Ring failure. Up until Challenger, the aluminum in the rocket fuel would make a seal and block the gases. It sealed in Challenger at first, but you can see the wind shear in the exhaust trail, and the nozzles swiveled to correct the course.