Paul is a False Apostle
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 фев 2024
- #christian #christianity #christ
In this video I will go over some of the overwhelming biblical evidence that Paul was deceived by Satan. Douglas Del Tondo also has a lot of great information on this his account is Jesus words only
To all of you in the comments: Why are you vehemently defending Paul or Saul of Tarsus, when you should be vehemently defending Jesus? In Hebrew “Tarsus” is a 4 letter word adding up to 666.
Agreed. They should call themselves followers of Paul rather than followers of Jesus.
Holy Spirit was in all apostles and Saints. Saint represent the children coming out of his bridegroom the church. Paul is included in that. Once we are saved we become righteous with God. Paul walked in authority of Jesus Christ, performing miracles casting out demons. He doesn't do it for himself but he always point to Jesus Christ. He humbled himself to be the lowest of the elders and the elders approved Paul as apostle leading the way in defining the church through the letters. You will disregarding 2/3 of the New Testament. The fact that you are disregarding 2/3 of the NT shows you are saying the Bible is not a living document. Repent from your thinking and turn to Jesus Christ, the Word in Flesh.
New sub here brother,
After 10 years of being a “Christian” I came to this very same conclusion. Started from that one prophesy in Genesis about Benjamin, then I believe God lead me to connect all the dots even though it was going against what I had been taught by “Christianity” .
This is a very important truth to share with fellow believers unfortunately you will catch a lot of heat from them as they are immersed with Paul’s teachings. They will try to prove Paul by using Paul’s own testimony and not Jesus. Because without Paul Christianity wouldn’t be able to function as a man made religion and business . That is the truth.
In Galatians 1:11-12, Paul asserts his apostolic authority and the divine origin of his gospel message, stating:
"For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel. For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ."
Here, Paul emphasizes that his teaching is not derived from human sources but directly from Jesus Christ through revelation, underscoring his authority as an apostle and the divine credibility of his message.
In 2 Peter 3:15-16, Peter acknowledges the complexity of Paul's writings and says its valid with the rest of scripture:
"And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures."
I call you to repent. Humble yourself to God's word.
Well said, but these genuine heretics presenting themselves as "defenders" of Peter and the word, don't seem willing to look at the actual Bible in their fanatical hatred of Paul. I prefer dealing with atheists in comparison. At least when they routinely distort Scripture they don't pretend to be defending it. I still have no idea what motivates these Paul haters and false accusers. They can't actually substantiate any of their false stories or explain how they think the can so misquote a Bible or try to deceive about intentions or even word meanings as I can easily check for myself about every particular and, I assume like you, easily see the truth. I assume they are either just the wolves attacking the Word for that reason of attempted destruction or, perhaps, does Paul get too close to the truth about themselves they can't deal with? Are they some kind of modern Corinthians I wonder. Best wishes.
which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. 👈17Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error 👈of the wicked, 👈fall from your own stedfastness. 18But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.
Anyways reading the entire verse Pharasee Paul is mentioned in connection with the Wicked not in a very good light kwim but anyways he's not even mentioned in Revelation despite Paul forgiving "sins" in "the person of Jesus Christ Pope 1.0
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b "Just as our beloved brother Paul" Did, you not read my message? Peter is calling Paul a brother with wisdom in his letters. Pray for some humility and examine the scriptures. Paul is not part of the group twisting scripture. You are doing that right now. Please repent!
@@howardparkes8787 and what else does it say? It ends at beloved? Who here is taking bits and pieces of the scriptures to give them different meaning?
The context is as follows Peter is comparing Paul and his epistles with those who Twist the scriptures to their own destruction and are led away with the ERROR of the wicked!!
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard 👈to be understood, which they that are unlearned 👈and unstable wrest, as they do also the other 👈scriptures, unto their own destruction.👈
17 Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye👈 also, being led away 👈with the error of the wicked,👈 fall from your own stedfastness
You left all that out just chose where he is being mentioned however You Fail to expose how Paul is being mentioned alongside The Wicked whom twist the scriptures to their Own👈 destruction
Oh oh
There are 12 Foundations in New Jerusalem Paul is None of them!!
Yeshua warned about him before his departure!!
Got Any scriptures that prove Paul? Oh wait you prove Paul by Paul to Paul in Paul 🙄🙄🙄 ye it makes No sense!!
@@user-ql3rn6tl1bwithout Paul there's no New testament. Paul indeed was caught up to the 3rd heavens. You need the Holy Spirit to understand what Paul was saying, your religion/ belief is blinding you, significantly too.
You claim he admits to being without law but totally gloss over him saying he was under the law literally a couple sentences before.
Romans 6:14: For sin will not have dominion over you, for you are not under law, but under grace.
Romans 7:1-6: 1Or do you not know, brethren (for I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man as long as he lives? 2For the woman who has a husband is bound by the law to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she is released from the law of her husband. 3So then if, while her husband lives, she marries another man, she will be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from that law, so that she is no adulteress, though she has married another man. 4Therefore, my brethren, you also have become dead to the law through the body of Christ, that you may be married to another-to Him who was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit to God. 5For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members to bear fruit to death. 6But now we have been delivered from the law, having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.
1 Corinthians 6:12: All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
Galatians 3:13: Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us. For it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree,”
Galatians 3:24-25: 24So that the law has become our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.
Ephesians 2:13-16: 13But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off are made near in the blood of Christ. 14For he is our peace, who made both one, and broke down the middle wall of separation, 15having abolished in his flesh the hostility, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man of the two, making peace, 16and might reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, having killed the hostility through it.
Colossians 2:13-14: 13You were dead through your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh. He made you alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, 14wiping out the handwriting in ordinances which was against us. He has taken it out of the way, nailing it to the cross.
Paul said contradictory things repeatedly, focusing on just the parts that sound good is cherry-picking for an idol.
@@soundphilosophy Well said.
@@soundphilosophythe guy in the video is cherry picking. Some of the verses show he’s foolishly in error in his understanding if he just keep reading. Keep following this dude if you want. Blind leading the blind.
@@soundphilosophy I’m idolizing Paul? Quite the accusation towards someone you don’t even know don’t you think? I idolize no one but the Great I AM!
Peter called Paul a beloved brother. 2 Peter 3:15,16. The only one here being deceived by the devil is you, Matthew.
In 2 Peter 2:15, Peter warned against false teachers who teach the way of Balaam. In Revelation 2:14, Jesus says that the doctrine of Balaam is teaching people to eat foods sacrificed to idols. The entirety of 1 Corinthians chapter 8 is Paul saying that it can be acceptable to eat food sacrificed to idols. Do you see the tension been what Peter wrote in 2 Peter and what Paul wrote to the Corinthians?
In 2 Peter 3:15, Peter calls Paul a brother, because that's what he is. Jesus said we have One Teacher, and we are all brothers. Notice though that Peter did not call Paul an apostle. Calling him a brother was taking him down a notch. Paul was going around larping as an apostle, but Peter didn't call him one. And then 2 Peter 3:16 is even more critical of Paul, but it's hidden in pretty much all translations. Peter calls Paul's writings "dysnoetos."
Paul likes to call things "anoetos" all the time. For example, he calls the Galatians this in Galatians 3:1. It's usually translated "foolish." The "a-" part means "not" and the "noetos" part means "understanding." It makes sense why saying the Galatians are "not understanding" is basically the same as calling them foolish.
But "dys-" means "bad." So in 2 Peter 3:16, Peter was saying that Paul's writings contained things that were "bad understanding." This is usually translated as "hard to understand," although this translation was only invented to reconcile Peter and Paul. Peter was really saying that Paul's writings contained nonsense. Given that Peter was against teaching people to eat food sacrificed to idols, and given that Paul taught people to eat food sacrificed to idols, it wouldn't make sense for Peter to be saying that Paul's writings were "hard to understand." He was saying Paul's letters contained nonsense.
Please take Jesus and Peter seriously when they warn you about Paul.
@@justinjozokos1699 There was no warning about Paul from Peter apart from him maybe being over complicated (as we surely all know that he can be) I really am seeing you and your friends fitting these warnings like a hand in a glove. Or maybe a foot in a slipper. You are simply rejecting the clear teaching of God in place of an inexplicable vendetta. I genuinely think that you simply have to try to eliminate Paul's teaching to justify some lifestyle or other choices you want to make. Narrows the field a little if that is the answer. It surely is something like that to fear and hate someone that much
i call my brothers and sisters beloved do i believe them over jesus nope 👎
@@Doctor1933 Paul was one of the last people anyone could accuse of trying to be over Jesus. His Christology is a model for the rest of us. These false accusations about him are evil.
@@hj925 no matter what you say i see apostle paul is false
Saint Paul is a false prophet? 😂😂😂 tell me, which sect do you belong to?
The narrow gate
I will take I follow No Pharasee for 200
Perhaps the sect that James the brother of Christ belonged to? Are you aware of the Clementine Homilies? This early Christian document (earlier than the NT) shows James declared Paul a false teacher.
@@theMobileJourno in Revelation 2:2 it says
I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, 🫲and are not, and hast found them liars:🫲
Now you read Romans 3:7
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my 👎lie 👎unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?
Right there, Paul IS a Liar And False Apostle
It doesn't matter. He's a smart guy who figured it out, that Paul was a fake.
Matthew, the passage in Acts 8 is describing the life of Paul BEFORE he was converted. That's why the tenses are in the past. I PERSECUTED the church and WASTED it.
They either don’t know or they are trying to literally deceive people about Paul so people don’t see or believe his contributions to the body of Christ. Paul expounded upon the Old Testament in such a marvelous way and drew Jesus to the forefronts so that we could understand the relationship of the new and old. He gave us brilliant context!
The fact, alone, that he changes translations throughout this lecture raises a red flag.
Paul purposefully misquoted the OT over and over again to fit his agenda.
The fact that he contributed so much to the religion is a problem lol. Paul was not a prophet. Synoptic writers like Mark Matthew and Luke simply recorded Jesus's life events and what he said. But Paul invented scripture.
He is a nobody. he isnot a prophet to invent scripture...
Heck, even prophets dont have that authority. Prophets only receive scripture from God alone.
@ let make a wager…when it’s said and done, I bet so see Paul standing on the right side of thee equation!
@@lampkin9287 betting is a sin...
Great role model this Paul is for you...
Paul's usage of "we" in 1 Thessalonians doesn't necessarily mean he will be alive when Christ returns. He simply means that BELIEVERS who are alive.
He's using "we" for believers.
Then why does he refer to the dead believers as "those" and "them"? It's not JUST that his use of "we" implies his inclusion in the living, but ALSO that his use of demonstratives and third person pronouns exclusion from the dead.
The fact that you're trying to twist what Paul said so that he didn't mean what he very clearly said means that even you don't believe what Paul had to say.
Assuming Paul was a liar and not a true apostle, what was the purpose of Yeshua being crucified, dieing and rising from the dead? Seems kinda pointless. Can you explain is Paul is a liar, why did Yeshua have to be the sacrificial lamb? Please help me understand.
Isaiah 53 Prophesied that it had to be that way.
@@Apex_Liverty but why?
@@inscoredbz the Book of Job is your best explanation, if say we didn't know it was All a wager the 👿 brought against God, The Book of Job would not make sense, but since it tells us why all that evil happened to Job we let the real message fly over our heads 🙄 you see
@@Apex_Liverty
Where is your denomination?..
Holy Bible, Psalm 84:11 "For the Lord God is a sun" 🌞😂
I just hope you Christians are gonna be ok with wearing a white robe like mentioned in the Bible verse below that Jesus is gonna give them, looking like a Jew or Muslim wearing a white body covering like that of a Burkqa 👇
Revelation 7:9-11 After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Jesus. They were wearing WHITE ROBES and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice:
“Salvation belongs to our God,
who sits on the throne,
and to the Jesus (whom is sitting at God's right hand as mentioned in Hebrews 1:3...
Hebrews 1:3
Jesus Who being the brightness of his (God's) glory, and the express image of his (God's) person, and upholding all things by the word of his (God's) power, when he (God) had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high. )”
Issa means Christ. It comes from Greek word Iesus which means Christ. Even the name Jesus was written as Iesus before the letter J was introduced to the English alphabet. Iesus means Christ. Therefore Jesus means Christ. Jesus' real name is Yahusha
Also "Allah" is from Genesis 35:7 Jacob calls the place Beth-El, El is short for Elaha in Aramaic language. Elaha is Alaha ( Allah) in Abraic.
Paul said opposite of what Jesus said. Therefore all 13 books of Paul should not have been added to the Bible, and therefore should be removed! Please Google what Paul said if you don't believe me.
Bible has been edited many times over many decades by Bible publishers in Western countries. The modern Bibles don't have the 16 verses that are in the King James version. They are missing. Here's the list if the verses that were obmitted 👇 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_verses_not_included_in_modern_English_translations
About the Bible, on "The Father and I are one". If i said my mother and I are one, does that mean I am my mother? No! It means I'm like my mother. Jesus is like his Father, same image. If Jesus is the Father, why does Bible say Jesus sat at the right side of God? Why didn't Jesus sit on God's throne if he is God? Hebrews 1:3
He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty
Is Jesus under God's curse? Because
Deuteronomy 21:3 says the body shall not remain all night on the tree (cross) , but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God.
Is Jesus Christ really the Son of God? Because in
Luke 3:38 it says Adam is son of God. "Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God."
In Exodus 4:22
Israel is God's firstborn son.
" Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord, Israel is my firstborn son "
Luke testified that Paul is an Apostle...
Same as Peter called Paul his Brother..
Only people who hated Paul claiming he is not an apostle like this one.. 🤣
This is the same spirit of the Pharisee when making debate with Paul, recorded by Luke in Acts 15:
Then some of the believers who belonged to
👉 the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and
👉 required to keep the law of Moses.”
Paul died of his Faith in Christ.
Did anyone willing to put his life for nothing 🤣🤣
Amen! You tell this fake counterfeit liar. Satan is working so hard to no avail for King Jesus 👑 has already the victory as do we IN Christ Jesus 🙏 All Praises honor and glory be to God forever ♾️✝️💜
How can Paul be a false teacher when Jesus Christ Himself appeared to Paul on the road to Demascus. Paul was chosen by Jesus Christ to be the Apostle for the the Gentiles.
You are undermining the Bible.
You are not saved, you heading to hell for twisting scripture.
This Guy did not watch the video😂😂😂. On top of what I said in the video Jesus would not directly quote a pagan God. “It is hard for you to kick against the goads” is a diresct quote from Dionysus an alter ego of Apollo… Revelation 9:11
How did Paul meet a risen Jesus after Jesus's ascension to heaven, when Jesus specifically warned that if anyone in the body on Earth says they met him in the desert or inside a room (in other words, inside or outside) after his ascension then they have been deceived or are deceiving others because it would be impossible? He told his disciples not to believe anyone who claims such a thing. And the reason he warned them is because he knew it would happen and that it was coming.
That is the one question that defenders of Paul never answer. They are happy to quote you a couple of sentences out of the book of 2nd Peter or remind you how he was called a brother (never called an apostle by the 12 apostles, by the way), but they never answer how Paul encountered Jesus in person on Earth when Jesus said that is impossible after his ascension, until his second coming, when all would see him at once
Matthew 24:26
paul didn't meet Jesus, he met a light that claimed to be Jesus, while allegedly quoting from Euripedes' work "The Bacchae" at verse 795.
@@educational4434 the only thing close to a rebuttal they have told me is that in Matthew 24:3 his students are asking about the end of the WORLD (primarily a KJV mistranslation). This fails as a rebuttal because the greek word it is translated from indicates the apostles are asking about the end of the age or G165 "aión". Just mentioning it incase you run into the same excuse. Plus the context infers Jesus is speaking to his apostles about things that will happen in their time period... regardless of this fact of translation, context is sufficient enough.
Paul wasn’t possessed by a devil.
He had a messenger of Satan to buffet him so he wouldn’t be lifted up with pride for the abundance of the revelation he received from the Lord.
Like for example when he went to the Churches of Galatia and preached the gospel.
Paul said he was shocked at how they were so soon removed from the gospel of grace unto another gospel.
It’s the messenger of Satan that followed wherever he went to counter Paul.
Is it possible that Paul wrote Luke, Acts, etc.? Maybe another writer that was there to corroborate Paul's testimony? Acts 26 says that Jesus called Paul to be "a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;"
If one were to read ONLY Paul, I would say that could be a mistake, especially since some things he wrote don't seem to make much sense, especially NOT knowing the contents of the letters to which he responded. As someone who has been studying the WHOLE Bible I do not see Paul as any kind of antichrist, but I HAVE seen a lot of documents that those who hated Jesus wrote about Paul from those early days. Paul's writings have NOT been a hindrance to me in my walk with Jesus Christ and I HAVE seen one person after denying Paul ending up denying Jesus Himself, and that is a TRAGEDY...!
Old testament validates Paul was in the desert: 1 Kings 19:15 NKJV
Then the LORD said to him: "Go, return on your way to the Wilderness of Damascus; and when you arrive, anoint Hazael as king over Syria.
who is him?
So you side with the Judaizers who were against Peter and Paul? Good going bro.
I'd rather side with Jesus than with Paul. Very sad that so many "Christians" choose to follow Paul over Christ.
Nobody's saying to follow Paul over Christ, that's a non- sequitur. Jesus himself said to hear his apostles is to follow and hear him. Peter, James and John, the 3 pillars of the church, gave Paul the right hand of fellowship in Galatians. You have no idea what you are talking about.
@@andys3035 it is not a non-sequitur. If people choose to follow Paul's teachings that explicitly contradict Jesus', they are following Paul over Jesus. Period. Paul was not an apostle appointed by Jesus. He appointed himself as an apostle.
"Peter, James and John, the 3 pillars of the church, gave Paul the right hand of fellowship in Galatians."
You know Paul wrote Galatians, right?
@missmerbella Galatians 2:9
and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.
II Peter 3:16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
Peter is calling Paul's writings scripture. Odd if he's a false teacher.
It is a non-sequitur because the argument to say Christians follow Paul over Jesus is unbiblical due to the fact the Apostles themselves gave Paul the right hand of fellowship, meaning they gave him the blessing of Apostleship. Your argument is misleading and illogical.
@@andys3035 citing Galatians is like saying Paul is right because Paul says so. It doesn't hold any weight.
Regarding 2 Peter, are you aware most scholars consider the epistle pseudepigraphical (i.e., authored by one or more of Peter's followers in Ancient Rome, using Peter as a pseudonym)?
Finally, if you haven't read them, I recommend reading the Clementine Homilies, specifically Homily 16 Chapters 8-13. Peter acknowledges the existence of errors in Scripture and their intention to "try us."
Reprobate
Paul?
Terrific work!!!
You nailed it!!
Paul is the Man of Lawlessness and Paul preaches the Anti-Christ no doubt about it!
Paul is against circumcision and was rejected for doing so.. Acts 21: 21/ Acts 21: 27- 30.. Peter and Paul separated gospel due to circumcision.. Galatians 2: 7- 8..
Matthias was elected 12 apostles in Acts 1: 26/ only 12 apostles.. Revelation 21: 14.. through Paul Christianity was established in Antioch.. Acts 15: 1
Ezekiel 44: 9/ Luke 2: 21/ John 7: 23/ Acts 7: 8! Circumcision is necessary to keep Passover, makes you as a natural born Israelite,One law! Exodus 12: 48-49.. Genesis 17: 13- 14.. or cut off from his people
Christ came and fulfilled all the law and prophets. Serving the True Christ is all that matters John I4:2I,23,24
@@plainwhitepaper3898 what is a pig doing trampling here
@@plainwhitepaper3898 I will not give a dog or pig nothing
@@inthenamemosthighHebrews 4:I3 and there is no creature hidden from His sight, But all thing are naked and open to the eyes of Him whom we must give an account.
Including how you regard The Living word of Truth.
@@inthenamemosthigh Matthew 22:39 you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Your anger, and hatred is evident. Especially that I only posted Elohim's Living Word of Truth (Hebrews 4:I2) word.
-John I4:2I,23,24
-Hebrews 4:I2
-Matthew 22:37-40
Are you sure Christ is your Lord?
“Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.”
-Matthew 15:14 KJV ✝️
👍
Soo.. 3:59 u didn't read the entire chapter or chapters before and after... or look at other translations or references, ur initial assumption is incorrect so ur conclusion is fallable.. bible also says study too show thyself approved rightly dividing the word of truth...becuz u want paul to be a "false apostle" u find confirmation bias by taking scriptures out of context?
Who cares about Paul or Saul? Trust in Jesus. Obey the 10 commandments.
Again you miss quote and you don't tell the whole story of Acts chapter 16 be careful if you actually read the Bible and you read that chapter you would know that they were in very unfriendly territory and that girl was screaming out to the people letting them know that they were preaching what was not lawful to preach I hope the people watching your video actually read the Bible and not just take your word for it
Bless you
James 2 didn't say the demons believe in Jesus. It says that the demons believe that there is one God.
Guess if you reject Paul you’ll have to reject Peter’s letters and the gospel of Luke since Luke wrote the book of acts. I guess it also means you have to probably reject the entire New Testament because the disciples who came after the apostles, studying under them call Paul’s writings scripture.
St Polycarp of Smyrna quoted Paul’s letter to the Ephesians as scripture
St Ignatius of Antioch, who succeeded Apostle Peter as the bishop of Antioch puts Paul down as being an apostle. So if you reject this, again you’re going to have to say Peter failed and picked a heretic to watch over the flock of God after him which is honestly a total mockery and clearly not the case.
St Clement of Rome referred to Paul in his epistle to the Romans as being an excellent example of endurance. It’s clear unanimously that the earliest Christians adored Paul, on top of the historic accuracies of the book of Acts, really show he was used by God to perform mighty works preaching the gospel.
Jesus Christ also appeared to John the Apostle… do you reject revelation as well? Or what about when Jesus said He would come with His Father and make His home in His people? Do you now reject John’s gospel? Christ said He would manifest Himself to us who keep His commands in John 14:21.
The second coming of Christ is when He comes in judgement. He came to Paul in mercy.
if you literally reject the writings of the earliest Christians, who were handed the scriptures and looked after them, being entrusted to shepherd God’s flock, you really have to do a lot of mental gymnastics.
I sincerely hope you come out of this deception and repent. If you stick as a biblical Christian, and learn more history you will realise how wrong this video is.
PS St Polycarp studied under John the apostle. He died as a martyr for Christ. As did St Ignatius
There was NO DEMON IN PAUL.
Let me school you kid...2 Cor 12 that you quote about a thorn...the conversation goes back a chapter to chapter 11, where Paul was ADMONISHING the church at Corinth in their BOASTING after the flesh. 18 Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will glory also.
Then Paul goes about glorying after his flesh, in a sarcastic way to show the church at Corinth how stupid they are by boasting after the flesh.
19 For ye suffer fools gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise.
20 For ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage, if a man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself, if a man smite you on the face.
21 I speak as concerning reproach, as though we had been weak. Howbeit whereinsoever any is bold, (I speak foolishly,) I am bold also.
22 Are they Hebrews? so am I. Are they Israelites? so am I. Are they the seed of Abraham? so am I.
23 Are they ministers of Christ? (I speak as a fool) I am more; in labours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequent, in deaths oft.
24 Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one.
25 Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep;
26 In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;
27 In weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness.
28 Beside those things that are without, that which cometh upon me daily, the care of all the churches.
29 Who is weak, and I am not weak? who is offended, and I burn not?
30 If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine infirmities.
31 The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not.
32 In Damascus the governor under Aretas the king kept the city of the damascenes with a garrison, desirous to apprehend me:
33 And through a window in a basket was I let down by the wall, and escaped his hands.
Then we get into chapter 12 where Paul discusses HIMSELF in the 3rd person, because he didn't want to REVEAL that it was him that went to the third heaven, but Satan WANTED him to boast about that about HIMSELF.
That was the thorn in his side. There was NO DEMON IN PAUL.
“I was given a thorn in my flesh, an angel of Satan, to torment me.” -Paul
Amen 🙏🏻
No demons huh well so who de hell is "The messenger of Satan"
2 Corinthians 12:7 by Pharasee Paul Vol 1
And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan👈 to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure
Who sent him "that" messenger? Was it God 🤔🤔🤔 NOT EVEN CLOSE!! 🥳👿
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b buff
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b are you aware of how many times in the old testament where God allows demons to mess with His own people? Like Job? Is Job satanic because God allowed Satan himself to bring him harm? Forget about it!!
Also why would God allow an evil demonic Pharisee to go to heaven if he was a false apostle? 😂
”Three times I pleaded with the Lord about this, that it should leave me. But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me.“
2 Corinthians 12:8-9 ESV
No one is as false as you , period !!
Right. Paul’s disciples were John Mark and Luke…Mark walked with Jesus and Luke interviewed lots of eye witnesses. They didn’t write anything bad about Paul and found it fitting to walk with them.
@@DivineDatabase so according to these mor-offs you can’t trust any of the gospels, because the claims of mark being the first
@pantheraonca28 hateful person
@@Prayerwarrior777 Thank you !! I'm just as hateful as this miserable whom did this video !!
in Matthew 24 when speaking of the false Christs to come, Jesus says he will not appear to anyone in the wilderness.
Therefore Jesus did NOT appear to anyone in the wilderness.
And since when does Jesus blind people? He does the exact polar opposite and restores sight to the blind.
And if 2 strikes against Paul aren't enough- in Acts 19 "the Jesus whom Paul preaches" does NOT cast out demons. We know from Luke 9 that's not because they're not followers of Jesus. Anyone can use the name of Jesus of Nazareth to cast out demons.
The problem in Acts 19 is that "the Jesus whom Paul preaches" is NOT Jesus of Nazareth and that is why the demons do not budge.
So to recap "the Jesus whom Paul preaches" appears in the wilderness, BLINDS people, teaches Lawlessness, and refuses to cast out demons.
Jesus of Nazareth won't appear in the wilderness, restores sight to the blind, teaches Obedience to God, and demons flee from his Name.
Those are literal exact polar opposites.
Paul preaches the Anti-Christ.
Regarding 2 Corinthians 12 you regard it as more consistent that Paul was communicating his requests to Satan? It does not state that Paul was demon possessed, nor do you provide any defense that the thorn in the flesh should be interpreted as demon possession. Moreover, the passage explains why Jesus did not grant the request. So read the passage and consider your question answered.
You quote Matthew 7:17-20 to accuse Paul of bad fruit. Paul did have bad fruit at some time. Then Paul began believing in Jesus and no longer behaved in this bad way. It's called converting to Christianity.
In Matthew 21, Matthew does not state that the commandments are the will of the Father. Also, you have not given any defense of the claim that this is what Matthew means. Moreover, Jesus states in John 6:49 that will of the Father is that everyone who beholds Jesus and believes in him will be saved!
You reference James 2:19 as saying that even demons believe in Jesus. No, that's not what it states. Quoting it correctly, Matthew. The verse states that demons believe this: that God is one. That verse states nothing about believing in Jesus.
You quote 1 Thessalonians 4. You provide no reason to believe that Paul is referring to himself and those with him when he says "we". Listen, Jesus said in Matthew 16:27-28 that he is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Well, it seems that they all died and no one yet saw Jesus come with his angels to repay every deed and come in his kingdom. Also, Jesus describes in Matthew 24 his coming and the end of the age, saying this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. Well, it seems they all died and these things have not all yet taken place.
So is Jesus a false prophet? Surely not, despite the superficial difficulty of these passages. Here's the thing. If Jesus is not a false prophet despite initial puzzles about why he would address his audience as being some of those whom would see his return, then do not blow hastily past Paul, like you do, when he likewise makes claims that at least superficial appear to be failed prophecy about his own generation. Rather, do the work of defending in-depth your interpretation of Paul's use of "we".
I would watch the rest, but ten minutes in and you are misquoting, misunderstanding scripture and offering little to nothing in the way of defending certain of your interpretations. Hmm. I believe there's a phrase for that, like "false teacher" or something like that. Hmm.
Thanks for the defence ❤
I had meant that the will of the Father is discussed in John 6:40, not 6:49.
Yes this is also why most apologists believe 2nd Peter to be Pseudepigrapha. Paul claimed there was no written evidence of his epistles.
In Acts chapters 21-24 he continues to deny any physical evidence that he taught against Torah, but many Pauline Christians teach that Paul wrote letters from jail after this account, but that goes against the very reason he wanted to be tried in Rome in the first place.
This means Paul's epistles didnt even exist while he was alive, they were written by people he taught verbally.
That makes 2nd Peter Pseudepigrapha (along with the rest of his epistles), because according to the book of Acts (and Paul himself) Peter never read or had even seen any of Pauls letters.
We could believe Paul and claim that his epistles were the act of someone trying to defame him or manipulate his teachings....
However, Johns Revelation 2 we see The Almighty congratulates the Jews of Ephesus for calling out Paul as a false apostle and liar as you have shown, so it is hard to believe Paul did not say what he did against Tora
Good video.
Jeepers creepers. Why's the veracity of Paul's Apostleship coming under attack? Because TRUTH is under all-out attack.
People who *condemn* Paul don't read the Bible by the LIGHT it was written in.
I'm an ex "awakened" new ager converted by the Holy Spirit. As a new ager I dissed Paul (once or twice) thinking I knew better, but now I'm BORN AGAIN I see better: I SEE he was full of the same *Spirit* filling me - and that's ALL I need to know about Paul: that he was anointed by the *Holy Spirit.* Paul was appointed by *Jesus Himself* and HE don't make mistakes. Seriously, to insult Paul is to insult *God's SPIRIT* which, Jesus says, is tantamount to the *unpardonable sin.*
Please watch the video with an open mind. Jesus is the Truth.
When jesus spoke about lawlessness, he was talking about the law of moses, not the law of the land. His listeners were all jews, so they would have understood lawless as those not keeping the law of moses. Paul was lawless because he said the law was abolished and therefore didnt keep it and preached others not to keep it. 'The man of lawlessness"is paul himself in his own words.
You can't be lawless when there is not law. IF the law is abolished, there is no such thing as lawlessness. Lawlessness is when the law is NOT abolished, and you don't follow it. But, Paul is right...the law is ABOLISHED...for those under the LAW OF CHRIST.
What Law was ABRAHAM under?
Are you aware that there is a wider and very common understanding of the description "lawless". One that is not so locked into the Mosaic law? Maybe you need to look into that
@@chapmaned24 The same law we have always been under. The law of a holy God
@hj925 Jesus is God. THE LAW OF CHRIST is not the law of Moses, which is also the law of God. One is by faith, the other is by works. Abraham was declared righteous just by believing. Those under the law can never be righteous because they have to obey every law perfectly. For all have sinned.
Faith
Genesis 15:6
And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness
Works
Deuteronomy 6:25
And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as he hath commanded us.
Repent of this heresy, while you still can. Your proof that Paul was a false apostle is using the bible, yet you ignore every verse that says Paul is "Called of God" Etc.
'
Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother, '
1 Corinthians 1:1
'Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, '
Romans 1:1
'If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. '
1 Corinthians 14:37
'But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant. '
1 Corinthians 14:38
'Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;) '
Galatians 1:1
If what you say is true we may as well throw out our bibles and go home. Thank God the bible is true and YOU are the liar. I pray you truly get saved and repent of this heresy.
100% Paul is the wolf. No question. But, very hard to reason someone out of a conclusion they did not reason themselves into.
"Hi guys. I'm here today to tell you that water isn't wet."
...after it dries
@@hj925Water is always wet...and Paul was an Apostle.
@@SquadJuiced Glad to see you understand that and are not one of the cult here who love to believe open lies and misleading claims about the Bible and Paul
Ah yes 2000 years of church history is all false and wrong because you the great prophet has come to discover the truth!! Have some humility
Its this way because Jesus said it would be… Narrow is the gate and few find it…
@@Apex_Liverty very silly reasoning so what you and the 10 other dudes that think this are gonna be heavens only residents? Use logic buddy.
@@joshyboiz1562 its true. Most of humanity will go to hell
I encourage you to have humility as this video covers deeply rooted theological questions that go back 2000 years. James the Apostle shared this exact sentiment in one of the oldest texts, the Clementine Homilies, so it's not fair to belittle this guy.
@@Apex_Liverty hey man, don't let these naysayers discourage you. Thomas Jefferson had the same conclusion, encourage you to look up his letter to William Short on April 13, 1820. You have good company! 😉
Refuting lies about the Apostle Paul by Matthew of RUclips world
This is all very bad on many levels - and if any of you take this at face value without checking then you will not only be deceived but store up judgment from God if you promote this attack on the Bible. Deserting this project will hopefully help you to avoid what Matthew will face for this film , at the time when God will hold him to account for slander against His servant. God is very protective of His servants because they always represent Him. I am so caught up with the scale of these errors and how they offend God
1) Introduction to the claims made about Matthew 7
a) The distortions and untruths start at the introduction with extraordinary and inaccurate claims that
Jesus’ teaching in Matthew was somehow focused on Paul. There is nothing in the context or any primary or secondary proof of that, nor is there any supporting evidence elsewhere in the Bible. This is clear invention.
b) The words of Jesus are said to be “prophe y”, with an apparent claim that links to future events. In Bible terms that would be an abuse of the normal use of the word and in this case the error may well come from a limited understanding of the term in a Bible context. I many situations the word prophesy is nothing to do with future events, but the declaration of God’s works. In this case in Matthew the context and content are undeniable conveying a message from God about His word and His will for us.
2) Slide Point 1:10 onward: (Butchering the Gospel of Matthew 13-14) This “interpretation” completely ditches the context of the actual account in Matthew. The claim that the Jesus is talking to believers and not atheists is actually completely made up. It is such a bad understanding that it is hard to credit the words uttered in this section and correcting it requires patience because it is so bad.
a) There is the complete failure to understand who Jesus was talking to, possibly because it references the presence of disciples, but that is a gross oversimplification. There were no “atheists” there in the modern sense because while there were clearly not followers of Jesus (despite the also false idea about that) “atheism” as we see and experience now just didn’t exist Within Jewish society the closest to that would have been the Sadducees. The main point of the Gospels is to highlight that is was RELIGIOUS people who mainly rejected Jesus’ message!
b) The crowd was made up of a variety of people. There were the actual disciples of course, but there were thousands who were not disciples, just coming to hear this amazing man. There were also the religious zealots looking for fault in Jesus and other people of all sorts. But the vast majority of the crowd listening to Jesus were NOT believers in the way Matthew presents them. We learn from John’s Gospel how on at least two different periods people who had believed themselves to be followers of Jesus because they agreed with some of His teaching turned against Him completely. It is a literally damning example of false religion.
c) So there is no doubt that most of His listeners did NOT believe in Jesus in the only way that matters.
d) The pretence by Matthew that the choice between gates and paths is somehow within Christianity and by believers is just nonsense. It is only about a life choice for default unbelievers as we all are, between carrying on as lovers of self or turning to the narrow path of following Jesus. This is different to true believers who are deceived by presentations like this God help them if they are, but it would be a worry as it would show that they never bothered to read and study the Word.
e) I will come on to the false slurs against the Benjamites at the next slide, but all of this content is wrong in terms of understanding although the accurate description of Jacob’s blessing was a thrill to see because it actually happened. That positive is crushed by Matthew’s failure to represent what Jacob said about ALL his sons.
f) What fiction is Matthew reading? Must be pretty gruesome. We know without doubt at this point that Matthew just makes up and distorts things to lie about Paul, but one of his ways of trying to do that is to damn the whole tribe and that just will not do.
g) Paul is vilified because of the terrible things he did, and tried to do to the Church, but it is awful to think that in Matthew’s world there is no repentance or forgiveness. The point about Paul made by all the accounts is a zealous religion man who did terrible things until he repented, believed and then served the man he had made an enemy. A wonderful transformation in reality, but apparently Matthew has decided it isn’t possible for Paul to be called, repent or be forgiven and restored - it doesn’t say much for Matthew’s understanding of the Gospel
h) But Matthew the hater slips in one of his worst and frankly incredible lies, that Paul committed
genocide. Again, there is no evidence at all of any killings on any scale, In fact, no actual evidence of persecution than imprisonment and punishment - bad though they were. Paul certainly issued murderous threats He clearly did persecute the believers who broke Jewish religious practice, but no one can or ever has accuse him of “genocide”. It is a ridiculous accusation in any sense. Apart from anything else, the Jewish religious authorities who authorised Paul’s activities had to work within what Roman, etc would permit. Probably the worse example of murder and Paul’s connection to it (although he was not directly involved in the killing) was the martyrdom of Stephen, but how many similar deaths do you think happened? Not significant numbers deaths at this stage for sure. It would be a while before the Roman persecutions of note and the overall pattern of even their hateful acts was very varied with long periods when the Church was left alone in relative peace.
3) Slide point 2:44 onward: (Butchering the Bible, esp Paul and the Tribe of Benjamin] The whole premise of linking Paul with comments about Benjamin is a false and certainly here, a completely bogus approach. It's a habit Matthew has of randomly picking whatever he wants from a text and pretending there is an actual relevant connection outside his mind and his determination to do whatever it takes to destroy a repentant man whose work never contradicted the other teachings in the NT (despite the brazen lies being circulated about that) There are many direct links to Jesus' actual teaching than can easily be seen int the Apostolic teachings although they are all consistent and true to Jesus)
One thing false teachers like Matthew (because he now clearly for that dreadful condemnation) is to ignore context. He and others who use the same texts about Benjamin in the same way make much - as here - make a lot of their claim - "Wolves bad" more that implying that Jacob was cursing Benjamin (that's what any innocent reader here thinks right? ) Very far from the truth.
a) Jacob did this for all of his sons and many of them were actually and very clearly condemned compared to Benjamin who actually did OK in comparison to the others.
b) This wolf thing is amusing if not dangerous because in some terms it is a compliment. Their fighting skill were greatly valued and commended as we see with the native cultures of North America and all sorts of other communities of the same sort
c) So how did God treat them? Actually a very important question about where Benjamin actually stood - right? Well, funnily enough God saved the Benjaminite tribe from likely extinction tribe when a sinful group (all the tribes had those) did some bad things and the other tribes went against them, nearly wiped Benjamin out.
d) Judah was the most blessed and which other tribe hung out with them most? Did no one else notice that when the 10 tribes were sent into exile the best two out of a bad bunch stayed for quite a while. Did someone ask "Two, I thought it was just Judah" It was Benjamin and Judah - so much for them being "evil" as a tribe or marked out for punishment But one of the worse, actually definitely the worst things in the "Wolves" slide is the appalling mis-application of Jesus' warning to all the false teachers of a sort that Matthew seems now to define. Trying to mangle what Jesus said to be about Paul is just the silliest thing and will definitely not go down well with the person who said it and meant it to be a warning not to mess with any of His lambs. Falsely using it to try to harm a lamb is really, really dangerous. God is watching. Who don't you read and study the Bible Matthew? Oh, yes, I know, it wouldn't suit you to see your ideas spoilt by reality. But beware that the Great Shepherd is coming again and, as I said above, He hates the wolf who tries to devour his lambs so beware.
You make a video response?
Utter rubbish! Guy has no idea what his is talking about😂
Not if you ask him!
Cuz gates be narrow!
2000 years and this boy has figured it all out!
@@randys2358 lol
also Paul is the founder of Christianity as outlined in Acts 11:25-26. Even Catholics call themselves Christians and they took on board Paul's hierarchy and Father position. We are not Christians. We are followers of Yahusha as defined in Revelation 12:17.
Luke
Mark
Saul of Tarsus None were Apostles
But traveling companions with Saul of Tarsus
Colossian 4:14
Acts 15:36
Paul never Acted Alone!!
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b Actually apart from the key 12 Apostles, there are multiple others who had the secondary position with the same title, but a slightly different role. Count them
@@hj925 count what 12 Apostles
Luke
Mark
Paul
Sorry none Apostles Revelation 2:1
the angel of the church of Ephesus👈 write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks
know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, 👈and are not, and hast found them liars:👈
Anyways Paul has this Ephesians 📚
Uber famous nowdays kwim
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b Have you counted those described as apostles in the New Testament? Try. The 12 Apostles were a distinct group. Other apostolic roles are explicitly mentioned
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b Ps. I should have mentioned, you don't need to run to Revelation to get warnings about false apostles ( just like today) Look at Corinthians. Another thing I should have picked you up on - although my life is literally too short to deal with all your cultish lies, Paul is mentioned by Peter and of course in Acts, but your twisted expectations/demands on the Word cannot be met because they are silly. It's not what it's for. Twisters don't get to decide. More crucially. Excluding 2 from memory. Where are any of the other 10 Apostles in your Bible? Tell me where?
WOW! PAUL Is The ONLY APOSTLE To Confirm CHRIST AS THE ETERNAL HIGH PRIEST!
No Other Apostle Brings This Truth To Fruition! As It Is Written! People Please Study!!!
KJV - Genesis 14 : 18 - Psalms 110 : 4 - Hebrews 5 : 6 - Hebrews 7 : 17 - Hebrews 7 : 21
I stopped at this title because I thought you would be spouting some nonsense and@1:00 the church was not established until Pentecost and were not called Christian until they started it at Antioch...and the Jews or children of Israel to whom he was speaking excepted him so much they turned him over to the Romans to be crucified.
False teaching and not edifying.............................................................................................................................................................
Thank you. Very well put together. I have some questions though:
1. What does it mean when it is said that JESUS FULFILLED THE LAW (not replace it). Please explain as simply as possible as I am a newbie.
2. Paul’s bad fruit does not seem to have been immediately apparent. Your examples of his bad fruit are from before his alleged conversion. A pro-Paul person would then point to his alleged post-conversion and say But look at all the good fruit in the form of the churches he helped establish.
@BeigeAdjacent in Hebrew the meaning of the word fulfill לְקַיֵם means:
keep, sustain, maintain, affirm, attest. In answering your second question, here are some of Paul's attributes after "conversion"
1) A liar (Romans 3:7)
2) A thief (2 Corinthians 11:8)
3) Boaster (2 Corinthians 11:5,16)
4) Unforgiving (Acts 15: 38-39)
5) Chameleon (1Corinthians 9:22)
6) Hypocrite (Acts 16:3, Gal 5:2)
7) Posessed(2CORINTHIANS 12:7)
8) Vengeful (1 Corinthians 5:5)
9) Confused / Bipolar (2 Cor 7:8)
10) Misogynistic (1 Timothy 2:11)
11) Chief of Sinners (1 Tim 1:15)
12) Deceitful(2 Corinthians 12:16)
13) Foolish (2Cor 12:11,2Cor11:1)
14) Practices evil (Romans 7:19)
15) Better than Christ (Col 1:24)
16) Bully (Philemon 1:19)
17) Boring (Acts 20:9)
18) Procrastinator (Gal 2:1)
19) Curses Others (1 Cor 16:22)
20) Punisher (2 Cor 10:6)
21) Hate the less fortunate (2 Thes 3:10)
22) People pleaser (1 Cor 10:33)
23) Blasphemer (1 Timothy 1:13)
@@Exposed777 Thanks again. So to fulfill the law, Jesus meant to KEEP all of the customs and rules such as food restrictions, circumcision, and about a million other neurotic, OCD things ? Does that mean as Christians were supposed to do that too? It just seems so … ugh.
And to start with he is a confessed murderer, Thou shall not kill.
@@Exposed777 I have never in my entire existence run across someone this ignorant of the Bible. Everything you posted scripture wise is in error saying it was after Paul’s conversion. 🤦🏾♂️
If your a newbie in Christ please don’t follow these foolish people comments nor this video. It it’s in total error. They appear to be wise but are total fools concerning scripture and will lead you astray. Read and study for yourself. and most importantly keep reading as this guy in the video stops and makes the scripture seem what it is not.
Aren't "Sheep" also "wheat" and "goats also tares"? Jesus defined them very clearly in Matthew 13:25. Isn't it strange and disheartening how no one wants to acknowledge this?
2 Peter 3:15-16 KJV
“And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.”
Great video and you made some very important parts that I have never heard anyone mention before.
What made you start questioning Paul's teachings?
I started questioning Paul after reading the full old and new testament, Because Pauls teachings seemed very different than the old testament, and also Jesus.
@@Apex_Liverty Same here: I started reading my bible and noticed a lot of contradictions between Jesus and Paul. It was pretty damning.
I don't know if you've heard this before, but it might further your point: a lot of scholars believe that Acts of the Apostles was a revisionist history account that was made to appear like the Apostles were in complete harmony with Paul's teachings \ Paul being more willing to compromise on his beliefs. If you look in Paul's letters, he directly contradicts a lot about what Acts says. Not only that, but it's likely Acts wasn't written by Luke, which doesn't invalidate Luke's divine inspiration in the Gospels like a lot of Christians think it does when you question Paul\Acts. There's an article by Richard Carrier (he is secular, but I think that his points he makes about Acts are still solid) about the revisionist nature of Acts.
@@xoAmelia7 I will check that out for sure🤙🏻
Boy what you are doing is wrong! Coming against 2000 years of established christian faith just by silly argumentation , supposing that God will use you to reestablish the Cristian faith ? You don't understand what your are doing.. everything you said is silly nobody can believe that. Childish argumentation !
@@edendieuveilngouanda8882
I don't understand why you are so upset: the OP is trying to share what he has learned in order to remind people that Jesus didn't come to abolish the law as Paul teaches, not at all. He gave us his 'yoke' (1st century Jews knew yoke to be a Rabbi's interpretation of the Torah) and we are to still follow the Law to Jesus' interpetation.
Read the Didache, read about the suppression and oppression of the Jewish Christians by the 'orthodox' church in the early centuries, and read about the parallels between Jesus Christ and Hillel Judaism and Essenism, and look into how Paul's teachings have warped how we read the Gospels.
Jesus was a Jew and He came to bring salvation to the whole world, but we have to take His yoke upon us.
God bless you.
Revelation 19:20 Says the Beast And The False Prophet were caught and thrown Alive into the Lake of Fire 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Nero was The Beast
Who is The False Prophet ???
😬 People still don't realize what they are reading when they quote the 14+ books of Pharasee Paul False Apostle from Hell!!!
Your timing is off - let alone your understanding of anything in the Bible. Leave Paul alone
@@hj925 timing is off? Let me guess what Jesus said "I come quickly" he was talking to HIS people 2000+ years into the future??
"The Time is At Hand" is a metaphor for i be back in 2000 years? 🙄🙄🙄
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b Could be 3000. We don't get to decide what God does or means. Of course we are usually defined by impatience for certain things. Recall the Apostles were impatient for the kingdom to come during the Ascension. We aren't in control and never really will be so better to refocus on something more in our "wheelhiuse" eh.
@@user-ql3rn6tl1b Oh, and talking about impatience, have you never been a child? Did the adult ever tell you how very long it would seem or discuss various issues of time and perception? Jesus meant what He meant and if you bother to go back to basics in the account, He had not long risen from the dead so there was actually no reason to question His authority.
@@hj925 3000? 🙄🙄🙄 Ok if you say so idk what translation version you use brah, Revelation clearly states he's coming was to take place while that generation was Alive including those who pierced him, you are wayyyyy off on this because the synagogue you go to only teaches you Paul mania!!
There you are thinking you don't know when the Teacher came back 😂 Jesus is Not coming back
Maybe Paul will make an special apperance
This is awkward.
I appreciate your enthusiasm even if I just cannot understand your views about Paul, but in the brief look I've had of this piece I have no idea what qualifications you have to make it. I am not any kind of expert, but aren't you more than a little out of your depth? Do you have any Bible training at all? I'm not qualified either and while I admire your attempt at an argument from what I've seen your approach is very strange and I have to tell you that it fails and I certainly will not be watching more of this. But I want to try to help you. I understand from minister friends that certain principle of study and analysis are essential even if qualifications aren't. Having a go isn't an excuse for poor work and you are clearly letting yourself down with this. Before I go I will explain with just one example among similarly flawed pieces (but I've ended up spending far too much time on this already) But hopefully it might help you to see how your work fell short for me. It's not an easy thing to do so I can just hope that you take this in the spirit I have tried to bring to it.
First of all I know enough to understand that some sort of basic "exegesis" is needed. Do you know what that is and how to do it properly? My dictionary defines that as "an explanation or critical interpretation of a text", You just haven't done that here as far as I can see. I stopped at the piece about Matthew 7, Genesis 49 and Romans 11 as there are a lot of obvious issues with them. To start off, each verse is a different piece and not really in any meaningful way part of the same puzzle. You try to connect them because you seem to think that you can do that if they used the same words, but you must see that is just not the case? Your thinking is pretty transparent though. You want to attack Paul so you concoct that by demonizing a whole tribe. A tribe that isn't dismissed in that way in the Bible. Yes, Saul was a bad king and there were conflicts between Benjaminites and the other tribes, but the verses aren't really saying the same thing and all the other tribes were failing one was of another anyway. It may or may not be of that much importance, but Benjamin were listed in fourth place among the tribes above the tribe of Joseph. It just doesn't see credible to be anything else. At the end, wolf is just a name for something dangerous and not really about one thing with nothing more about that long disappeared tribe at all.
The Genesis judgment about Benjamin is because they were a wild bunch and hard to deal with, but they were loved they were also the closest to the favorite Judah ( surely a big plus for them) as we see they were not singled out in any way for more punishment. Jacob loved them, but his prophesy recognized that they were greedy and often violent, Their father knew then but when were they ever prophets? Recall the shock when God made Saul a prophet for a few moments? That bunch were not prophets in either sense of the word!
So you have two quite different texts only really connected by similar behavior. In other sense the people were quite different and the context was totally different.One was a specific warning to the Church and the other one a general descriptions of a "difficult son". where is there any real link apart from the use of "wolf" - does that mean every text with wolf in it has some hidden connection? Does this new rule apply to every other word like this? Are all the lions in the Bible linked in some mystical way?
Please find someone who can help you to "handle the word" properly before many more find your approach out.
So no real links at all, although you tried to make a link, Why did you do that? It became obvious that you just want to make Paul a villain because of his part of the family, like being nasty to cousin Elmer because his father went to prison. Paul was just one of a lot of descendants and surely his point was meant to be what he said clearly enough (I think), God still loves his people. Are you a replacement theology claimer? A lot of is really don't like that approach at all. Or are you an anti-Semite? I really hope you are not. But if Paul and the Benjaminites are evil and rejected, as you obviously seem to be saying, why just them? Surely you mean all Jews. Again, a lot of us would really not be happy with that idea. Be careful how you present these sorts of thing, especially at the moment.
Gal 1:8-9 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
This was just embarrassing to watch. It's amazing to me the demonic teaching that can be puked out when verses are cherry picked while simultaneously ignoring contextualization and absent any exegesis. Reconsider your actions.
I appreciate the feedback brother, if you could please provide examples of how verses are being taken out of context, maybe starting with Revelation 2:2 for starters. Thanks again and God Bless
@Apex_Liverty Stop pretending like you're here for an honest exchange. You and I both know what you're doing,
@@davidoliver2418 If you are unable to provide how it was taken out of context I have no choice but to believe that you yourself are just assuming it is out of context without evidence. What does Jesus say about blindly believing things… If the blind lead the blond both will fall into a ditch. God Bless hope this helps, and if you are able to provide how it was out of context that would be greatly appreciated because I am open minded and willing to know the truth whatever that be.🙏🏻
I think you were channeling Del Tondo in this one. The way you spoke sounded like you were trying to emulate him. Great video.
@jesuswordsonly
I found the speaking in this video to be clearer pronunciation than Tondo. But I still do like Tondo's videos.
Thank you. I know many refuse to recognize this.
In 2 Peter 3, the apostle Paul is referred to as a ‘dear brother’ by the apostle Peter. We see here that Peter acknowledges Paul as a ‘dear brother’ (in the faith). In 2 Peter 3:16, there is a warning to anyone who would distort/twist Paul’s writings.
You guys on RUclips must be careful who you watch, as RUclips is full of misleading videos. You must be careful not to be led astray.
“Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” - 2 Timothy 2:15
Jesus Christ is Lord and Saviour!
“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life” - John 3:16
“But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.“ - John 1:12-13.
Always take what you hear back to The Bible and CHECK to see if what you're hearing adds up. God bless you all
This whole teaching of being saved if you believe in christ even if you do bad works, does that come from paul? Because it doesn’t make sense to me.
Paul did spread a lot of false doctrines some of which you will see being preached about in Jehovah Shammah TV
So there is no Holy Spirit then?
@jesselubberts1013 there is a Holy Spirit, but he is the breath of God, and Yeshua is the word made flesh. They are NOT 3 in 1. Blessings
@@Exposed777 You said there was no trinity tho. That is denying the father, son and holy ghost.
@jesselubberts1013 No it is not denying them at all. They are not 3 in one. There is only 1 God, like I said before even Yeshua himself says this! Mark 12:29.
Jesus is God 🙏🙌
4) Slide point 3:04 Matthew there is no “Benjaminite wolf” - you just made that character up completely. Even if your accusations of the whole tribe were not untrue, that false reference does not lead to a single person! Benjamin at this time meant the tribe - just like used of Judah, etc
a) Thornbushes are a general example by Jesus of good or bad things - how are you going to make “bitter water” about Paul, it’s the same principle. None of these illustrations are about specific individuals, they are all about sinners or saints. You absolutely have to read up on exegisis because your errors are glaringly obvious. Random word linking is silly to the extreme. There is no connection between this example of a thornbush and what Paul talks about as a “thorn in the flesh”.
b) The idea that there is hidden meaning is an awful way to approach scripture and more than a little alike Gnostic approaches. You have no special revelation Matthew because the meaning is clear and exactly as it should be understood.
c) Paul’s issues are not a demon in the sense you mean and Paul was never possessed by a demon.
d) The widely understood reality here, is that Paul was suffering from something that troubled him deeply and God did not choose to heal him of it. Perhaps you need to look at the example of Job and how that worked. We cannot know what it was or why God permitted it, but why do any Christians suffer? You may be young and fit enough to feel safe from physical conditions that will bring you daily problems, you may be foolish enough to think that God will always answer your prayers for deliverance when that time comes to you. Wait.
e) Paul did not have a demon and Peter wouldn’t have fellowship with a demon possessed man or call him “beloved”
f) The fruits illustration is universal
g) Thank you for reminding us that Paul had been Saul. Paul does acknowledge the harm, but, as I said before during your “genocide” accusations the actual end results for those he imprisoned is not so clear. More to the point, once again, that was pre-conversion Saul/Paul. He was forgiven and continually repentant as we see in his self condemnations Feel free to confess your sins Matthew, tell us how bad you’ve been if you wish, but those confessions aren’t the point if you are forgiven by Jesus - as you maybe haven’t been?
h) You need to focus on that word “Previous” and, of course, if Paul had not been fogiven and changed, he would have been under this same condemnations
Slide point 7:4 Mangling salvation and warnings to false converts
a) Petty variations in wording do not mean what you claim and there are other examples of alternative ways of saying the same things
b) Paul’s words to describe the process needed for anyone to be saved are fine.
c) Jesus is warning the religious and false converts that He will see through their claims. This, again, is a universal warning
More to follow as this nonsense is repetitive and wearing unless done in short batches
Shameful work
@hj925 Matthew 7:15 Genesis 49:27. Paul is definitely a false self-proclaimed apostle. I pray God gives you eyes to see and ears to hear.
@@Exposed777 No he isn't and apart from Muslims only real wolves want to divide the NT and remove important teaching that is clearly completely in line with the other teaching - other groups like LGBTQ+ radical feminists, Antinomians and the rest are also queuing up so it is just a question of which you are, but if Matthew and His arguments are the best you have then you are dead in the water and sinking without trace. Your problem, as with Matthew' s sad nonsense (and I feel a little guilty that he can get no credit at all for his effort) is that you have no internal or external evidence for your destructive claims - not least because there clearly are harmonies across Scripture. Don't bother any more, just set up your own religion. There must be some spare Asherah about.
Why does the New Testament teach of a kingdom in opposition to God when the Most High Himself says that He does not know of any?
Isaiah 45:5-7
5 I am the Lord, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:
6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the Lord, and there is none else.
7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.
---------------------------------------------
Luke 10:17-19
17 And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name.
18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.
19 Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you.
Revelation 12:9
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
John 10:10
10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
2 Corinthians 4:4
4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
Colossians 1:13
13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Paul never said he was possessed by a demon. What he is saying is Christ allows us to suffer in order to strengthen us. And how exactly did Paul divide the church? I don't see the church divided by what Paul said, just people wanting to twist the meaning of Paul's writings. As i read through Paul's epistles, I don't find anything contrary tot he rest of scripture.
Talking about Paul's fruits..apparently you don't believe in the Grace of God, that a person can be forgiven and changed...you're judging him based on the old person, not the person Jesus forgave. If you read paul in full context he preached obedience and to stop sinning, not just believe.
Dear reader Romans 3:7 says Paul was a Liar then in Revelation 21:8 it says No Liar will enter heaven, so what do we do there, oh and mr Agent 007 contradicts all of JESUS teachings on The Law and keeping the Sabbath etc, Everyone kept The Law except for The Pharasiees who Jesus addressed as "sons of the devil" and Paul IS a Pharasee 👈
👆
Truth is not power. Truth is a person. Repent and stop this madness. How can you be so messed up?? !
Im not sure what you are referring about
I used to believe Paul's Jesus was Apollo myself. No, it was Dionysus the want-to-be demi-god he encountered. If fact it is Dionysus who is the beast from the abyss.
It is a B' to discover the Jesus of the modern churches is no one other than the beast who comes out of the pit and kills the two witnesses, the Law and the Prophets. Because the Law and the Prophets needed to be destroyed in order to believe Paul's message of faith alone. Yes, abaddon and apollyon means destruction, Dionysus was known as the destroyer of men and families.
The tough part is not throwing the baby (Yehoshua) out with the dirty bath water. That is why so many when confronted with the truth that the Christianity of today is false, become atheists and never look for the true Messiah, as they now believe he is a myth,
Blessings and peace, and welcome to our mutual journey my brother.
Bear
Well said.. between all the church b.s. and paul’s double-speak, it’s a miracle my faith survives
I’m gonna research Dionysus.
Hey, my preliminary theory is Paul might be the rider on the white horse, seal 1. Given a crown, authority, and a bow, new covenant, to deceive (wolf in white sheep covering) and conquer. What do you think?
I think faith alone good brother is Martin Luther's message
@@user-tuppsot = every time that Jesus was ask how to get everlasting life, Jesus always said to obey the commandments. The only salvation possible is by works, which starts by the works of obeying the commandments. Matthew-19:17, Mark-10:17, Luke-18:18,
I think Paul really laid the foundation for a new system where instead of following "the law", you now follow doctrine. Doctrine and getting your beliefs right replaces the law. And that is what saves you, according to him.
Matt check hebrews 6:1 and ask the question who would try convince people to leave Jesus
A the holy spirit?
B God?
C Jesus?
D satan?
Who of these would teach "leave" Jesus cos he was not perfect ?
Heb 6:1
God wouldn't lie to us. If so, Paul would never have been called, and his letters wouldn't be in the Bible.
You're insane.
Tell me where he said that God lied to us
what is interesting is that Torah followers also defend Paul. They always say he is difficult to understand and he speaks for the law. He speaks for and against the law, depending on his audience, but the for and against the law is not the issue. The issue is the way Paul says we get saved. Saved by grace through faith APART (separated from) from works. Yahusha preached saved by our works and by having the testimony of the real Messiah (Yahusha). Paul says our works don't save us, but we know that in the end books will be opened and everyone will be judged by their works and they will be split to left and right. Paul says Yahusha does not see us, but we are covered by Yahusha. This is not what Yahusha says. We will stand before Yahuah and He will see US and judge US by our deeds. The 7 churches in Asia all have works in common and those are the churches of Yahusha. Paul says everyone in Asia rejected him. That should settle it.
Oh dear
@@hj925 yeah this has to be the dumbest comment section I have ever seen. $20 says they think the earth is flat
@@calebmoore4727 I'm waiting for it to be Paul's fault for dropping it
@@hj925I see people making sound arguments, and then people clutching their pearls in response. Throughout my life, I’ve learned that those with the arguments tend to be right.
@@calebmoore4727you sound like you’re boosted
When the scribes wanted to support the doctrine of atonement, they have added verses like Matthew 18:11 For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost
The bible footnotes explain that verse Matthew 18:11 was not in the original old scriptures
Hebrews 9:22 “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” is a misunderstanding of verse Leviticus 17:10-14 which is not about atonement but is about dietary laws. God has clarified that blood in meat is not good for health; that clarification was necessary to the people who did not have advanced medical tools to know that eating the meat with the blood still in it is bad for health
The true word of God is not what is written by the unknown writer of Hebrews; it is what has been taught by Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jesus and the Prophets who taught the forgiveness is possible by obedience, repentance, and prayers
Proverbs 16:6 teaches that “In mercy and truth atonement is provided for iniquity.”
Psalm 69:30-31 teaches that praise worship is better than sacrifice
2 Chronicles 7:14 teaches that forgiveness is obtainable without a blood sacrifice
‘If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin’
Jonah 3 teaches that people are forgiven when they repented and fasted, without offering any sacrifice and without shedding any blood
Proverbs 17:15 states:
‘He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the righteous, both of them alike are an abomination unto God’
That should be considered as a warning to the teachers who promise free salvation to the sinners and who teach that the innocent has been punished on behalf of the sinners
Jesus taught the parable of The Prodigal Son in Luke 15:11-32 to highlight the importance of obedience and repentance as the main prerequisites for salvation
That is the core Christianity teaching as taught in Matthew 7:21 Not every one that said to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven
Jesus has confirmed the teachings of the Old Testimony ‘in repentance and obedience is your salvation’ as taught in Isaiah 30:15
In Matthew 25:31-45 Jesus described the final judgment as being based on good works; he clarified that those who obey the law will be saved
Salvation is not based solely on belief and nothing else; salvation is not granted to those who merely profess acceptance of Jesus without performing kind or compassionate deeds
In Luke 13:3 and 13:5, Jesus taught that repentance is necessary for salvation
But unless you repent, you too will all perish
Mark 12:33 teaches: And to love one’s neighbor as himself, is much more than all burnt offerings and sacrifices
What Jesus taught here is not different from the wisdom taught by the old testimony Hosea 6:6
‘For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings’
That verse teaches us that forgiveness is possible by repentance and obedience; no sacrifice is necessary
Matthew 9:13 teaches that Jesus came to call the sinner to repentance
‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice, for I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance’
The wrong teachings about original sin, atonement, and salvation by grace without obedience to God’s law were taught by Paul who was not educated by Jesus.
An example of Paul’s contradicting teachings is also found in Romans 2:13 versus Romans 3:20 - (what he taught in Romans 3 contradicted what he taught in Romans 2)
“For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified”. Romans 2:13
“Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified” Romans 3:20
Love to see more and more people waking up. He was a gnostic and a docetist.
What an incredible dumpster load of tripe. This teaching is so poor. The will of the Father is to “believe the Gospel”. This young man is the false teacher himself.
Why should one then consider any of scripture, as scripture? The new testament canon goes together as one. There are a few letters only, which could potentially be disputed, and they aren't even the ones from Paul.
The only logical conclusion would be to throw the whole of the church's scripture out, as it is clear from the beginning that everyone used all these.
All that the church has achieved in bringing to you and everyone else in the world the gospel, has been achieved through that canon, through that theology and understanding.
You and the entire culture that even entertains the gospel at all is inextricably tied to the entirety of the NT canon.
This approach cuts down the branch it is sitting on. It is hyper-modernism at its finest, a pure left brained approach to everything. It is death.
when Paul mentions "scripture" it can ONLY refer to the Old Testament as the Gospels and the New Testament, except for some of the letters of Paul had not been written yet and Paul certainly did not know that his letters were going to be bound and put into the New Testament that was not compiled until long after Paul's death.
@@LordJesus-qw9vq What are you talking about? Paul never mentions gospels in plural, and certainly not in a context of talking about as if it's a text. He does mention a gospel. That means good news of a victory. It's the words meaning at the time.
@@LordJesus-qw9vq What is your point?
@@MortenBendiksen the point is Paul's letters are not scripture according to Paul.
Jesus doesn't say to not believe anyone who meets him here or there, but to not believe those who point to a specific place and says that is where he is, and that you should turn towards that place and be distracted.
Jesus is talking about his return, which is not localised. It is experienced by everyone. The point is that it must be YOUR experience. I believe it is an always occuring thing, different for each, it is the telos of all things being revealed, because in Him all things are. But that's more of a deeper philosophical issue. The important thing is to not think He is inaccessible to you because one location is it.
If Paul were to fit this description, Paul would have erected a shrine at the road to Damascus, and made everyone go there and do stuff. He would have made a cult, which is exactly the opposite of the effect all of Paul's writings in the foundation of the church.
This is obviously because Jesus is everywhere, and in all. It is meant to not create cults, where people believe only they have the true jesus, or that one location is where he is approachable, or one person is his true contact.
Paul does the opposite. He meets him, obviously describes it as being not a specific place but in heaven, but even if it were s specific place, that's besides the point. He then goes on to explain how Christ is in us all, not sitting in a location. He is everywhere and can be met everywhere by faith.
If anyone tells you "oh, he's in this church, or that church", don't leave your own to go dee. That doesn't mean He is NOT in that church, it just means you're not to believe he is that limited as to be located in a specific church.
That's what I was saying for years.
This is the best explanation and most straightforward presentation I’ve found. Good job. This is definitely one I can share with others. I pray to God that this message gets out. I downloaded with RUclips premium and saved.
I truly appreciate it. 🤝
During his trial, Jesus testified to the high priest that he never taught anything secretly away from the public, yet he charged his disciples privately not to tell anyone that he was the Christ (Matthew 16:20). The writers of the New Testament did not fact-check their work.
Matthew 16:13-20
13 When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
14 And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
John 18:19-20
19 The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine.
20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.
@@mariobethell3731 god wants everyone to figure out who Jesus is on their own. He sends just enough signs for those who have eyes to see.
@@mariobethell3731 = I am not sure what your point is. Simon Peter, "not Jesus", said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus only confirmed and said that they should tell no man. In addition, teachers would be expected to teach their disciples, even when other people are not around.
@@DocScience2 If you are not certain of my point, read my comment again.
Bart Ehrman Wrote: It is out of these later disputes that a letter emerged allegedly written by Peter to James in Jerusalem. The letter is preserved in a group of writings allegedly written by Clement, Peter’s successor as bishop of Rome. In this letter “Peter” tells his compatriot James to transmit his writings by following the example set by Moses. Just as Moses passed his books only to specially selected individuals who could be trusted, so too the books of Peter’s preaching are not to be given to “any one of the gentiles,” nor to any “of our own tribe” (Jews) before they have gone through a period of trial to demonstrate that they are trustworthy. The reason for Peter’s concern is clear: there have been some gentiles “who have rejected my lawful preaching [that is preaching about and in accordance with the Law], and have preferred a lawless and absurd doctrine of the man who is my enemy” (2.3). These Gentile enemies have tried to “distort my words by interpretations of many sorts as if I taught the dissolution of the Law” (2.4). But for Peter this is a heinous charge, for he would never oppose “the Law of God which was made known by Moses” and which was borne witness to by Jesus, who indicated that none of the Law will ever pass away while there is a heaven and earth (quoting Matt. 5:18). Peter, in other words, insists that the Mosaic Law continues in full force. To think otherwise is to oppose God, Moses, and Jesus (2.5). It is only “the man who is my enemy,” and the gentiles he has influenced, who have twisted Peter’s words to make him appear to say otherwise.
Paul is obviously “the man who is my enemy” and “the gentiles” are his converts. The Christians who preserved this letter, and presumably most of those who originally read it, would have seen it as an authoritative account written by the leader of the disciples. But there was, in the end, no chance that it could become canonical scripture: Paul was a hero of the orthodox tradition, and the standard view, going all the way to the canonical book of Acts, was that he and Peter saw eye-to-eye on every point of faith and practice. Despite the revered status of this Petrine letter among groups of Jewish Christians, orthodox church leaders would have considered it a heretical forgery. Apart from its chance survival in writings allegedly by an important bishop of Rome, it would have been completely lost to history.
The Bacchae" is a Greek tragedy by Euripides that was first performed in 405 BCE. The play takes place in Thebes and tells the story of the god Dionysus, who has traveled across Asia collecting followers before returning to Thebes to punish his mother's family for speaking badly of her. The quote Paul makes Acts 9:5 (KJV) And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. Thus is in that play. Paul has attributed a quote from a Greek god to Jesus.
here are some of Paul's attributes after "conversion"
1) A liar (Romans 3:7)
2) A thief (2 Corinthians 11:8)
3) Boaster (2 Corinthians 11:5,16)
4) Unforgiving (Acts 15:38-39)
5) Chameleon (1 Corinthians 9:22)
6) Hypocrite (Acts 16:3, Gal 5:2)
7) Posessed(2CORINTHIANS 12:7)
8) Vengeful (1 Corinthians 5:5)
9) Confused / Bipolar (2 Cor 7:8)
10) Misogynistic (1 Timothy 2:11)
11) Chief of Sinners (1 Tim 1:15)
12) Deceitful(2 Corinthians 12:16)
13) Foolish (2Cor 12:11,2Cor11:1)
14) Practices evil (Romans 7:19)
15) Better than Christ (Col 1:24)
16) Bully (Philemon 1:19)
17) Boring (Acts 20:9)
18) Procrastinator (Gal 2:1)
19) Curses Others (1 Cor 16:22)
20) Punisher (2 Cor 10:6)
21) Hate the less fortunate (2 Thes 3:10)
22) People pleaser (1 Cor 10:33)
23) Blasphemer (1 Timothy 1:13)
Just to expand on the term "wisdom" in 2 Peter 3:15, Peter is here referring to the 'philosophy' of the Greco-Roman tradition of Plato, Aristotle, etc. and in particular the Gnostic tradition, whose membership believed that salvation was achieved through 'knowledge' rather than through effort or works. The Romans and their predecessors the Greeks brought this worldview to Judea, and it was viewed by the Judeans as the dangerous foreign teaching of their violent and suppressive Greco-Roman occupiers. Yet modern Christians miss this critical point and believe that Peter is saying Paul is 'wise' when it is the exact opposite!
sheol in Hebrew is שאול.
Saul in Hebrew is שאול.
These are the same word translated to death.
Isaiah 28:15 (KJV) Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
Following Paul is a deal with death. We are judged by works.
Excellent video! Paul is definitely the one Yeshua warns us about in Revelation 2:2. Blessings & Shalom. New sub here.
Thanks and welcome
@@Apex_Livertyruclips.net/video/NoIqmEwHJ98/видео.htmlsi=htfn-E4-YzLseS-E
@@Apex_LivertyDuring his trial, Jesus testified to the high priest that he never taught anything secretly away from the public, yet he charged his disciples privately not to tell anyone that he was the Christ (Matthew 16:20). The writers of the New Testament did not fact-check their work.
Matthew 16:13-20
13 When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
14 And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
John 18:19-20
19 The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine.
20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.
@@Apex_LivertyWhich of the following prophecies ever came through, for they were predicted to be fulfilled in the generation that Jesus lived.
1 John 2:18
18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.
Matthew 16:27-28
27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Mark 13:24-30
24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
28 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near:
29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.
30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
Matthew 24:29-35
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
Matthew 10:19-23
19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.
20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.
21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.
22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.
23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Acts 2:14-20
14 But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judaea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words:
15 For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day.
16 But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel;
17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:
18 And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy:
19 And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath; blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke:
20 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and notable day of the Lord come:
Deuteronomy 18:21-22
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
Definition of generation:
all of the people born and living at about the same time, regarded collectively.
God himself awoke Paul to share his Gospel. You don't think much of the Holy Spirit do you?
our Messiah would never use a pagan deity's words: Is it too hard for you to kick against the goads is from The Bacchae by Euripides and the quote is from a god called Dionysus
You are correct. No one ever uses colloquialism. And if anyone does, they are a false prophet. Like when Jesus said "Hades" that disproved Jesus, right? I mean, Hades was a mythical place that was part of the Pagan religion. Or could it simply be the way that language is used for communication? If someone told me to "stop beating a dead horse", they would not be literally telling me to stop the abuse of an animal. And when an Athiest tells you to "Go to Hell", they are not actually telling you to go somewhere that they deny the existence of. God does communicate to people in a way that they can understand, and in this case, He did it in a way that, when repeated, the people that heard it, would know what was being spoken of. The person that made this video is ignorant, and hopefully finds his way. Don't blindly believe things without doing research on your own. Cheers!
We call that kind of thing apologetics or just every day language. Have you never used common phrases from the world around you? Of course you have. Paul's use of contemporary phases at the Areopagus was no different to a Christian quoting Dawkins. It doesn't mean agreement. Of course in that sermon Paul was using widely accepted Greek ideas to point to a creator and a common bond we all should have to be right with Him.
@@hj925You ignore the great point that THE MESSIAH would not quote a pagan god! Paul said JESUS said that! Hello?! Paul is a liar and has misled billions of Christians into following his false amoral faith-alone doctrine.
@@soundphilosophyYou mean the common "Kick against the goads phrase"? If it was actually any kind of actual quote - because I can't see any kind of evidence that it could have come from a specific play or linked to any character. It's ultimately a a country phrase with no meaning apart from a determination that a stubborn animal won't resist applied to Paul. You must accept that many phrases do cross into common speech and there is nothing inherently wrong with that. You do it all the time and so do your tribe. Does saying "I'll be back" link the speaker with a murderous robot from the future. Language is just that usually and Paul's words were not specific to your claimed source, has no inherent meaning apart from you won't win. Your interpretation is far too specific and actually unproven, so please don't parrot these things out of context. In any case, words have no power in themselves and the idea of telling God what say and do? That just won't wash. In any case, as I've previously pointed out, even if it was a "borrowed" common phrase, using phrases gives no approval to them. As I said, God won't be dictated to by you unless it is something that would be at odds with His character - words don't have any power in that sense - or are you simply a Gnostic or another cult member? On a related point it doesn't sound as if you've read Hosea with understanding of quite how far God will go in terms of His expressions. In any case, to repeat, it seems likely that your claimed source is just wrong anyway. It probably isn't even a quote in context. You could also dwell on this, Jesus actually did use more identifiable secular phrases including about the weather. His last words were not in Hebrew either, but you just can't dictate His words or prove your claimed origin. Probably all part of these false narrative with more than dubious evidence and a sinister motivation your group lives. You should stick to what the Bible actually says and stop trying to twist and destroy it.
@@soundphilosophy I've given a much longer response, but the summary is that for all your detailed claims, or even acceptance by some that it may have been a very common phrase based on a specific object used across the then world and common to Greek and Latin communities, your claimed attribution is way too specific. You do know what a oxgoad was and what it used for don't you?
Paul preaches the same exact gospel that Matthew Mark Luke John and the other disciples preached and the same exact gospel that Jesus taught all of us to preach. The difference between the other disciples and Paul is that Paul preaches the gospel of Jesus Christ in mysteries. You have completely failed to understand what Paul explains. Paul preaches to keep the commandments of Jesus. Paul never taught faith alone grace alone or eternal security at all. Paul preached what is called the law of Faith which is what prevents boasting and the law of our faith is love. Though false preachers out there dude tried to use Paul's writings out of context to support faith alone but Paul rejects faith alone all day long and preaches the same gospel Jesus preaches. When Paul uses the word believe, Paul is referring to obedience. Believe in obedience is the same exact thing they are interchangeable words. And Paul explains the difference between the law of Faith compared to the law of works. The law of faith is the works of loving Jesus by keeping his commands. In the law of works is of the old covenant traditional laws such as circumcision. The law of Faith prevents boasting because everyone's required to repent and be baptized which is how we establish the first and second greatest commandment through repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus. the law of works does not prevent boasting such as circumcision because men have to get circumcised in women do not but circumcision in other traditional laws of the old covenant does not justify. And Paul confirms that if Jesus confirms any commands in the flesh we are not to void them but we are to keep them. There is not one thing Paul preaches that Jesus did not. Paul and Jesus Christ preached the same exact thing. Jesus preached to plain and simple but Paul preaches the same things but in mysteries.
How can it be that the sheep are sleeping and follow the shepherds on a path of destruction? Is it laziness, is it negligence? Can it be that it is fear of being removed or being made ridiculous by the surrounding people family friends and so on when they follow their inner soul and simple minds?
Paulinists get so mad when true Christians quote Jesus 😂
Well done! Since we are not saved by grace alone, works are important. This is great work. You stuck to using the Bible and gave lots of examples. May our Heavenly Father continue to bless your loved ones and you.
And yours as well 🙏🏻
change your mind from this works to be saved Pharisee mindset And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
The video about Paul being a false apostle opposes Christianity and contradicts what God says about one of his chosen servants. The Lord Jesus personally appeared to Paul on the road to Damascus and called him into the ministry as an apostle (see Acts 26:14-18). Paul stated in 1 Corinthians 15:7-9 that the Lord was seen after the resurrection "of all the apostles... And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. For I am the least of the apostles, that am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God."
In 2 Peter 3:15, Paul is referred to "as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him." Paul was beloved by the other apostles and the believers Peter was writing to.
The Lord Jesus fulfilled the righteous requirements of the law, something men could not do for themselves. Therefore, believers are justified by the faith of Christ, not by trying to acquire righteousness through the keeping of the law which cannot be kept perfectly by men living in a body of death prone to sin.
In Romans Paul says, "God forbid" to sinning at all even though we are under grace and not under the law. Christians are not under the law, but not without law. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 7:19, "What matters is the keeping of the commandments of God."
The commandments of God the apostle Paul referred to are the commandments Christ mentioned in the gospels. There are 21 sets of 7 Commandments of Christ. We can conclude then that Paul was NOT lawless. Furthermore, Paul talked about "coming to the OBEDIENCE of faith."
Paul said follow me as I follow Christ. WHAT??? I dont need to follow no man but the Messiah. HE said, it is finished. You can not expound on a work that was finished by the Messiah himself. The Father sends His Holy Spirit to dwell in us. You have no need for man to teach you. Messiah said 1 teacher that is HIM. Call mo man father you have 1 FATHER who is in heaven. Ye are all brethern.
Paul contradicts that. He said to some ministers, pastors, etc. and many of you are withou fathes, i became as a father to you. Whatever day is Sabbath for you is ok, the commitments were nailed to the cross. Stop.
"Follow me as I follow Christ" can be explained in so many ways. If there was a more describing scenario it would clear it up more. So for example If he was talking to his peers since he was a man that was of upperclass so what he meant was probably amongst such as "Follow my words that i have gotten from Jesus"
Why don't you study the Bible? Jesus called His Apostles and disciples with the purpose of them modelling His life and teachings and where that is done properly in the true Church it is still the model to follow. They never "replace" Jesus, but are meant to help and given the errors in Corinth and so on, it's helpful for them to see the Christian life lived out. Look at the qualifications of Church leaders outlined in Titus to see how that was meant to cascade down the Church. You just have the wrong idea of it, but the Scriptures are clear enough if you look beyond your anti-Paul views and they do not in any sense try to replace the Lord Jesus
@@hj925 I will take "I Follow No Pharasee
For 200 "
@@apostlethereal Paul gonna confess your name before God
🙄🙄
No one can follow Paul & Jesus
Jesus said I come not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it"
Then Paul 👇
Knowing that a man is not👈 justified by the works of the law, 👈but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works 👈of the law:👈 for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified
Ah ok🙄🙄🙄
The Law lives on and is ♾️ Paul is a ravenous Wolf Genesis 49:27
Well if you think the law is still active, you’re in a tight spot because you can’t even keep it. If you’re going to keep the law you must keep it all. That includes the animal sacrifices at the temple. You don’t get to pick and choose. Get circumcised too. Keep the feasts.
Or realise that Jesus fulfilled it like He said in the end of Luke. If you put your trust in the law you won’t be able to stand because you cannot keep it.
If you reject Paul, you reject Peter’s epistles, Acts, and the gospel of Luke since he wrote acts. The disciples who studied under the apostles like St Polycarp, St Ignatius and St Clement all spoke favourably of Paul or quoted his epistles as scripture.
Which basically means if you reject Paul you end up rejecting the entire new testament essentially.
Is this guy just looking for attention?
You are starting with the presupposition that those who listen to Jesus believed he was the Messiah, so that is not true. Furthermore, Jesus is saying that there are two roads, the road of self indulgence or the road of self sacrifice and that many decide to take the easy road and at the end will only find death and destruction. I have studied Paul letter for many years and I have found zero errors or signs of him being a false prophet as you say. I am not sure why you have taken this position against Paul but Paul was chosen by Jesus to be an apostle to the gentiles, and if he was chosen by Jesus himself he is totally faithful and truthful in all his teachings.
How can you read Matthew 24:26 completely out of context? It's about not falling for false Christs in the tribulation, not about anyone claiming to have seen Jesus in the wilderness or in a secret chamber. Paul never preached about a false Christ or attempted to get anyone to follow anyone other than Jesus.
Salvation is by grace through faith without works, Ephesians 2:8-9, faith in Christ's finished work to crisis, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Explain, then, why Jesus says in Matthew 5:17 that "not even the smallest detail of God's law will disappear [...] so if you ignore the least commandment and teach others to do the same, you will be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven" or why in Matthew 7:21 Jesus says he will reply, "I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God's laws."
You supposed followers of Christ are really followers of Paul. Jesus was a Jew. He did not come to abolish the law of Moses. He came to accomplish their purpose. If you diminish and demean the law of Moses as Paul did, it cannot be said that you are following Jesus.
@@missmerbella Jesus came in the 4 Gospels only to the lost sheep of Israel, do you think He said that just so stupidly, are you an Israelite, did He speak to the Gentiles at all, what did He say to the disciples when He sent them to spread the Gospel, do not enter the Gentiles, but rather go to the Israelites, and as Paul says, now there is no difference between Jews and Greeks, I am the Apostle of the Gentiles, follow me, now we see that Jesus sent Paul to the Gentiles, so we need to learn to properly separate the Word of Truth in Scripture 2 Timothy 2 :15 KJV, who writes, to whom he writes, for what time he writes and for which group of people he writes.
I'll add another one you didn't mention, where JESUS says. I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
The final book in the bible is revelations, and it lets us know this
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus
Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city
I pray we all continue to pray and search the scriptures for truth, for Jesus said if you love me keep my commandments
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Then a some verses down it says
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Thus saith the Lord the King of Israel, and his redeemer the Lord of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
7 And who, as I, shall call, and shall declare it, and set it in order for me, since I appointed the ancient people? and the things that are coming, and shall come, let them shew unto them.
8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace
So since i use the names HE taught me
Glory to the most High YAHUSHUA, which means YAH is our salvation HALLELUYAH which mean praise YAH , HIS full name YAHUAH which is spoken in our breath each time we breathe and if you study you find HE has written his name in our own DNA , So peace and love be with you all on your journey to more understanding as our HEAVENLY FATHER continues to show us more Truth in these last days
Yeshua was never called Jesus or Christ only Yeshua those names would inserted centuries later.
Bro dropped the best presentation I've seen😭
Appreciate that my friend!🤝
It was satan that dropped it.And you listened to the enemy way too easily
@@Apex_Liverty no problem
@@TheAlienPunker bro at-least try to defend ur religion
You have to be kidding. HE tries to take what Paul did before he was saved and then apply that as bad fruit. Like bro, that is before his conversion why would he have good fruit and a non-beliver? Please stop getting your theology from kids on youtube
There is no indication in Scripture that "the thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan" meant that the Apostle Paul was demon-possessed, that would be impossible. Paul was born again and had the Spirit of God dwelling in Him ( Romans 8). How then could he have been demon possessed?
No an angel of satan who never left is a angel of satan..... And its location is right there in paul... Wake up... Cos you dont want it true doesnt mean you can suddenly say a angel of satan is not a demon or that in the flesh of a person does not mean not in that person..... Its demon possesion face it...and btw the Holy Spirit does not share no temple with an angel of satan that never left
@@stevenvanvuuren8394 , "a messenger of Satan to buffet me", how does this show Paul was demon possessed? I'm still waiting you to prove to me, from the Bible, that messenger of Satan means "demon possession".
@@stevenvanvuuren8394 Just cus you want it to be true doesnt make it true either buster
@@mikipope5140 oh ofcoarse not it all can be proven
Great video!
Another thing I associate with 'wide is the gate and broad way' is how much of the NT is comprised of Paul's writings. As of right now, I attribute everything from acts to 2 Peter, minus James, to be from paul, or an accomplice of Paul, so more than what's even widely accepted.
now this video is awesome. You covered so many more things that I wasn't aware of. Thanks so much. I hope a lot of people wake up and see Paul for the snake he is.
I appreciate it, and I hope so too🤝🙏🏻
@@Apex_Liverty dude i dont know how long you been reading the Bible but everything you accused Paul of being and doing is a complete lie i wish i could have been with you when you made this video so i could prove just how twisted and out of context your sayings are. Im dead serious ive been studying Gods Word for years and i have never heard such nonsense about Paul. You are one of the people that Peter says misenturpret Pauls writings to your own distruction. When Paul met with the other apostles he said that he knew just what the rest of them did also. As far as Paul talking about the law he said if your walking according to the Spirit then you are not under the law which is correct, why do i say that? Its because if your walking according to the you are no breaking any commandments thats what it means its so simple, the ones who are under the law are the ones who break it and if you dont understand that then you are definitely one of those who that Peter says will cause your own destruction! And it was Jesus who blinded Paul because He had to get his attention before he caused more damage to the church and Paul was doing everything out of ignorance until Jesus stopped him on that road and Paul even says that he was the least of the apostles because he persecuted the church but God had mercy on him because he did it out of ignorance. Now, you apparently dont know what Pauls thorn was, if you read before and after that scripture you will understand that Pauls thorn was satan trying to stop him from preaching the Gospel (Christ and Him Crucified) cause everywhere Paul went to preach he was beaten and thrown in jail and even got stoned , thats why he asked God to remove it from him, he was thinking God im working for You but everywhere i go satan is trying to stop me and discourage me from preaching but at the 3rd time he asked God to remove it he finally realized that it was a pleasure to suffer for Christ thats why he boasted more about his trials with satan and he knew that if we suffer with Christ we will reign with Him. Paul never told anyone to sin in fact when he talked about the grace of God he said so what do we say should we continue in sin so that grace may abound?GOD FORBID! MAN I COULD TAKE APART EVERY TWISTED STATEMENT YOU MADE IN THIS VIDEO AND YOU ARE THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO REPENT OF YOUR MISINTERPRETATION OF pAULS WRITINGS BECAUSE LIKE PETER SAYS YOU ARE HEADED TO YOUR OWN DESTRUCTION AND YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANYONE HERE THAT BELIEVES YOUR NONSENSE! MAY JESUS OPEN THE EYES OF YOUR UNDERSTANDING BEFORE ITS TOO LATE, THERE WAS A REASON I SAW YOUR VIDEO IT WAS TO CORRECT YOU IN JESUS NAME! LORD HELP ALL WHO HAVE LISTENED TO THIS GARBAGE!
Don’t just believe what you’ve watched like it’s automatic truth. Cos if you throw out Paul, you will have to throw out Peter’s epistles, the book of Acts, and the gospel of Luke because he wrote acts.
Jesus Christ appeared to John the apostle too in revelation. So what now? Are you gonna discard hm too? Surely not!
The disciples who studied under the apostles literally all affirm Paul.
St Polycarp who studied under John the apostle quoted Ephesians as scripture.
St Ignatius of Antioch, who succeeded the Apostle Peter as bishop of Antioch. He wrote Peter and Paul are apostles.
St Clement of Rome calls Paul an excellent example of endurance.
If you deny their writings, you’re essentially calling the people who looked after the scriptures, entrusted to shepherd God’s flock apostate after one generation of studying directly under the apostles. It’s akin to throwing out the entire New Testament. Please repent and take heed you are not deceived.
As a Muslim, I say much thanks. This indeed a great job.
Mean to tell me that the apostles were against paul n nothing was never said. They knew something n wouldn't lie n went to ther death n paul did two
The only thing false is thus man teaching. He us false and will be exposed on judgement day as all false prophets and unbelievers. They will reap what they are sewing and will bow to the Lord Jesus and confess that He us Lord and then be cast into the lake of fire where they can scream and regret that they could even speak.
I’m dumbfounded by how wicked this teaching is.
I'm curious to why this theory is wicked? Before agree or disagree id like to understand your knowledge of this topic..There's more inconsistencies with Paul than pointed out in the video.
I would be happy to be proven wrong because it would be so much easier. But you would first need to answer how Paul met a risen Jesus after Jesus's ascension to heaven, when Jesus specifically warned that if anyone in the body on Earth says they met him in the desert or inside a room (in other words, inside or outside) after his ascension then they have been deceived or are deceiving others because it would be impossible. He told his disciples not to believe anyone who claims such a thing. And the reason he warned them is because he knew it would happen and that it was coming.
That is the one question that defenders of Paul never answer. They are happy to quote you a couple of sentences out of the book of 2nd Peter or remind you how he was called a brother (never called an apostle by the 12 apostles, by the way), but they never answer how Paul encountered Jesus in person on Earth when Jesus said that is impossible after his ascension, until his second coming, when all would see him at once
@@educational4434 100%. This is what I always get back to. Jesus said not to believe people who claim to see Him out in the wilderness, and Paul claimed to see Him out in the wilderness. Believing Paul is literally disobeying Jesus.
Plus that line they like in 2 Peter is always mistranslated. You can tell because in chapter 2 of that epistle, Peter warns about false teachers spreading the way of Balaam. But we know from Revelation 2:14, from Jesus Himself, that the doctrine of Balaam includes telling people that it’s ok to eat food sacrificed to idols. So because 1 Corinthians 8 is Paul’s guidelines for when it’s ok to eat idol food, we can clearly see that Peter was calling Paul a false teacher. He didn’t say that his writings were “hard to understand,” but that they were nonsense
@@bobillielook up video called: Les Feldick - Is Paul Our Apostle? Best breakdown you’ll ever hear concerning Paul. Vid is 44.04 minutes long.
@@educational4434 are you saying Paul even fooled the other apostles? Peter even calling Paul’s writings scripture in 2 Peter 3:16. Why didn’t Peter tell Paul he hadn’t seen the risen Christ because He already ascended? It’s too much for you to consider him a true apostle but not too much for the apostle Peter. Perhaps you know better than he did.
I support the author of this video! Kudos to you !
According to the teachings of all prophets, salvation is based on obedience, repentance, good deeds, and forgiving others - if we forgive people, God will forgive us.
No human sacrifice is necessary for salvation.
No human bloodshed is necessary for salvation.
No savior should die for the salvation of others; everyone is responsible for his own salvation.
Jesus has also confirmed the same in Matthew 18:21-35, 6:14-15, Mark 11:25-26, Luke 6:35-38, Matthew 19:16-19, Matthew 21:43, and Matthew 25:41-46
The only exceptions are the distorted teachings of Paul who taught that Jesus death was necessary for forgiveness of sins in 1 Corinthians 15:3, Romans 5:6-10 , Romans 4:25
Paul taught that people can be saved by accepting Jesus as savior in Romans 5:8, Romans 6:23, Romans 10:9, 1 Timothy 2:3,4,6, 1 Timothy 1:15, 2 Corinthians 5:21, 1 Thessalonians 1:10, 1 Thessalonians 5:8,9 Romans 5:10-11, Romans 5:1, 2 Timothy 1:10, Titus 2:13
The teachings of Atonement were taught by Paul in Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 1:13-14, 1 Corinthians 15:3, Romans 4:25, Galatians 1:4, 1 Corinthians 5:7, Ephesians 5:2, Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 1:13-14
But Paul was not educated by Jesus and he failed to teach the wise teachings of Jesus
When the scribes wanted to support the doctrine of Atonement, they have added verses like Matthew 18:11 For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost
The bible footnotes explain that verse Matthew 18:11 was not in the original old scriptures
Hebrews 9:22 “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” is a misunderstanding of verse Leviticus 17:10-14 which is not about atonement but is about dietary laws. God has clarified that blood in meat is not good for health; that clarification was necessary to the people who did not have advanced medical tools to know that eating the meat with the blood still in it is bad for health
The true word of God is not what is written by the unknown writer of Hebrews; it is what has been taught by Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jesus and the Prophets who taught the forgiveness is possible by obedience, repentance, and prayers
Proverbs 16:6 teaches that “In mercy and truth atonement is provided for iniquity.”
Psalm 69:30-31 teaches that praise worship is better than sacrifice
2 Chronicles 7:14 teaches that forgiveness is obtainable without a blood sacrifice
‘If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin’
Jonah 3 teaches that people are forgiven when they repented and fasted, without offering any sacrifice and without shedding any blood
Jesus taught the parable of The Prodigal Son in Luke 15:11-32 to highlight the importance of obedience and repentance as the main prerequisites for salvation
In Luke 13:3 and 13:5, Jesus taught that repentance is necessary for salvation
But unless you repent, you too will all perish
Mark 12:33 teaches: And to love one’s neighbor as himself, is much more than all burnt offerings and sacrifices
What Jesus taught here is not different from the wisdom taught by the old testimony Hosea 6:6
‘For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings’
That verse teaches us that forgiveness is possible by repentance and obedience; no sacrifice is necessary
Matthew 9:13 teaches that Jesus came to call the sinner to repentance
‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice, for I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance’.
We can easily see that the only exceptions are the attractive teachings of Paul to make it easy for people so that he wins the competition against the disciples (like the bad politicians who promise many attractive promises to win)
The message that God has revealed to all prophets is:
‘Blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience’
God does not predetermine bad plans for good people.
God does not predetermine good plans for disobedient people.
We see many people born poor but have succeeded in life
We see many people born rich but failed in life
God has empowered us to do and get whatever we want.
God has delegated that task to us, it is up to us to be blessed or to be cursed.
All prophets taught that we can earn salvation by obedience, repentance, and good deeds to help others.
“In obedience and repentance is your salvation” Isaiah 30:15
Based on the above, the obedient believer should be blessed in this life and should be saved in the afterlife.
That is the truth which should set you free
“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." John 8:32
They've started to change Christianity now, saying Paul is a false apostle and replacing the name of Jesus with Yeshua.
Because Jesus was english hippy right
@@vanhap Yeshua Ha Mashiach is the name of the Antichrist demon Metatron.
His name was never Jesus. The name Jesus is like 400 years old 😆
@@Exposed777 Yeah you've been exposed alright. Show me where in the old Greek NT the name Yeshua appears and I'll give you speedboat!?
@mikipope5140 Paul is the one being exposed here. The book of Matthew, which was originally written in Hebrew uses His real name Yeshua, unfortunately it has been destroyed, but there is evidence that it existed. Also, Yeshua means Salvation in hebrew and He is our Salvation. Jesus is a pagan deity named after Tammuz the sun god (hense sunday probably being the day you assemble with other j believers). I really don't care what you think because I hear from God directly on the matter. Besides, the letter J is only a few hundred years old so in reality the name jesus isn't there either. I have a relationship with my God and Yeshua, my salvation. Have a blessed day ❤️ Proverbs 14: 5-6
Yes Paul is the double minded man, being the author of confusion as he not only contradicts Jesus, but contradicts himself so many times. I lost count over the past five years. As Jesus says, "if you love me obey my commandments". I don't see where Jesus teaches we are saved by grace. Bless you brother!
@@catalyn080 Yes true. Jesus speaks so much about works to the churches in Revelations, and Jesus came to 'FINISH THE WORKS..." and be the example that works are required. Amen!
So much Paul hatred - is it because in reality, he preached Jesus so effectively?
@@hj925 well let’s see. I dare you to send us five quotes that Paul quoted Jesus. If he was taught by Jesus he would abide in the words of Jesus. Bless you
@@TheShutterbug1968 Do you accept any of the New Testament? Hold it all to the same standard. Do you know what a creed is? If you did (because I doubt you do) then you'd find them in Paul's writings along with high Cristology on a par with anything less . You are a divider and false teacher (wanna be) exactly as Peter, John, James and Paul, etc warned against
FANTASY theology and completely untrue
Not sure how I ended up on the darker side of youtube.