Frequency Response and Random Response (Dynamic Response in Nastran)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 янв 2025

Комментарии • 19

  • @ManuelRamsaier
    @ManuelRamsaier 2 года назад

    Thank you very much for this video, it helped me understand PSD analysis quite a bit!

  • @captainvlog
    @captainvlog 4 года назад +1

    Dang, how do I even still have a job when you've turned what I do into something so simple! haha. Great presentation.

  • @_Wai_Wai_
    @_Wai_Wai_ 3 года назад

    I was actually on the WFIRST program at Goddard a few months ago. What a small world.

  • @CADIS_Software
    @CADIS_Software 7 лет назад

    Thank you, Structures Aero!

  • @muslimmukhtarkhanov8194
    @muslimmukhtarkhanov8194 3 месяца назад

    an excellent lecture

  • @Tracks777
    @Tracks777 7 лет назад

    Great content. Keep it up!

  • @mono7891
    @mono7891 3 года назад

    Great explanation but would have liked it more if cards were shown in text editor.

  • @claude7473
    @claude7473 7 лет назад +4

    Interesting if the sound were not so distorted, words keep escaping my ears... recording sound thru a secondary connection instead of the original source is a terrible idea.

  • @jrharrison3
    @jrharrison3 7 лет назад +1

    The input PSD you show at 34:58 doesnt match what you plot at 41:20. Do you know why? I appreciate your help.

    • @jrharrison3
      @jrharrison3 7 лет назад +1

      I figured it out. From ---> community.plm.automation.siemens.com/t5/3D-Simulation-Femap-Forum/Random-Response-Analysis-ASD-Units/td-p/407823
      "....For random response analysis, the loading is a unit acceleration( 1g) applied in the frequency response portion of the solution. If you want all of the response quantities(accel,force,stress etc) to have proper units, then this would 9.81m/sec^2
      This means after scaling by the ASD, your acceleration results are actually (m/sec^2)^2, which may not be so handy to look at(since your input ASD is g^2/hz). But with Femap charting, you then scale the acceleration results back into g^2/hz by dividing by (9.81m/sec^2)^2
      A good check to make is to always request accel response for your base drive node, it should match your input ASD if you are consistent with units. ..."

    • @nitinks5140
      @nitinks5140 6 лет назад

      @@jrharrison3 thanks for letting others know what you figured out. 😃

  • @nitinks5140
    @nitinks5140 6 лет назад

    Thank you Sir.

  • @stevengrobler4608
    @stevengrobler4608 6 лет назад

    Thanks for this example, I found it very useful. All of the random excitation examples I seen have a flat PSD for the input, which I suppose is essentially the definition of random. Supposing I want to use a PSD that is more peaky, ie it has peaks at harmonics of the machine operating speed - is the analysis still valid? For example are the 1-2-3-sigma percentage breakdowns still valid? Also, supposing I want to know the 0-sigma stress how do I find that value? One more question - if I have measured input PSDs in the X/Y/Z directions is it possible to apply a different PSD to each direction?

  • @natarajanvenkatasubramania9721
    @natarajanvenkatasubramania9721 6 лет назад

    Hi,
    In the Random PSD plot, in the out put is it possible to evaluate the G value (Gpeak) for a particular frequency. How can I do that? There different versions to find the Gpeak is floating around. I need to find the correct one. Thanks.

  • @upendranvs
    @upendranvs 7 лет назад +1

    When i tried to solve im getting FATAL Error please help me in this
    USER FATAL MESSAGE 3046 (SQFREQ)
    THIS FREQUENCY RESPONSE ANALYSIS HAS NO EXCITATION SPECIFIED FOR IT.
    where to define a excitation

  • @nghialuu2203
    @nghialuu2203 5 лет назад

    Where can I download models? Thank you

    • @myfem3102
      @myfem3102 4 года назад

      Mình cũng Việt Nam. Chào bạn