This Google March Spam Update Is Going To RUIN SEO
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- My SEO Course 👉 vascomonteiro....
****** Google just released it's March core update and a lot of AI sites got penalized.
That said, the issue isn't with AI SEO content, instead, it's with unhelpful content that doesn't satisfy the user's search intent.
First things first: This Google update did NOT focus particularly on AI content, instead, it focused on unhelpful content.
Google does NOT care who/what writes the content as long as it's helpful for the end user.
Whether it's a human or a robot writing it, as long as it satisfies the user's search intent (i.e. answers their question correctly and fast) and it's valuable, there won't ever be any issues.
Your site got clapped not because it has AI content, but because the content isn't good enough.
In fact, you should use AI content if you're not yet.
And if you are, you should double down on it.
Here's the AI writer I'm using 👉 tryjournalist....
That's why you NEED to use AI 👉 Tryjournalist.com/?
Human writes "this product is great". AI writes "this product is great". How the hell can AI tell?
The point is that it's irrelevant if it's human, a robot or a dog writing it. As long as it's quality content you're all good
Also, is there a discount code / affiliate link we could use?
email support for a coupon code and mention you came from my youtube channel
You are just pramoting your tool nothing else...
Can you do a video on how to generate long form website content with journalist?
You need to pay much more attention to each AI-generated article than to the number of articles per month you have been promoting with your tool and others. Even with a team manually reviewing and improving each AI-generated article, it's easy for the content to become webspam-and I'm glad when it does. Google is also increasingly monitoring the speed of new content generation. Even with a large team, producing a high volume of content won't seem natural. Even if manual revisions make it look less repetitive, that doesn't change the core issue. I'm not saying AI isn't helpful; it's very useful, but the approach you've consistently promoted-producing a series of articles, automatically publishing to blogs, and automating up to 99% of the process-is not necessary in such large volumes. Even with many different websites and significant funds to hire a large team for content review, the costs just keep rising.
And it all boils down to competition. This AI era compels everyone to use AI, leveling the playing field for all. The result is the usual mediocrity, only now with more people producing web spam. And Google, not even GoD (should one exist), doesnt have the financial and technical resources to continually crawl and index every piece of content being produced recklessly.
My advice is to use AI to slightly expedite processes (and assist in many other aspects not directly related to content generation), but avoid overdoing it. Inject considerable care, I mean, a great deal of love and personal insight, into everything you write and create. I suppose this applies to life as well. 😊
I was waiting for you to comment on this
🫡
@@VascoSEOtips ya man really appreciate your channel
By chance would you be able to make a Keyword Research tutorial as it pertains to rank and rent and maybe how to know if you found good keywords for a particular city?
I’ll pay you to make a video on this! How much?
but ai content is rarely helpful nor unique so
Not necessarily
Can we create backilinks like edu etc.. during this core update? What you suggest 🧐