One aspect of Polaroid photography that I never see mentioned, is that before the advent of digital photography, it was your only option if you wished to take photographs of an (ahem) extremely personal nature, that you did not wish to be processed in a lab. Likewise, the same would be true if you took photos of a criminal nature, or were themselves a crime.
The flipside of this is that Polaroids are almost unquestionable as evidence photos because it's nearly impossible to alter the images without it being very obvious. All other image formats- especially digital ones- can be rather easily altered and if it's done well enough that can be nearly impossible to detect. That's why all the apartment maintenance people used them to document damage on move-outs.
Indeed. I have some friends who had pictures taken of them that were simultaneously all three >.> By the local chief of police, of course, because there’s no better way to insulate yourself from local investigation…
@@P_RO_ it’s very easy to alter a polaroid if you know what you’re doing. obviously there are limits…but it’s fairly absurd to me that photographs are accepted as criminal evidence
Here's another example: The Canadian company that makes and barely markets the LabRadar has sold the oversized Doppler Radar Chronograph for several years and it's price and large format form factor have remained unchanged for most of those years with little to no changes or upgrades. Then, out of the blue, Garmin comes on the scene with its own Ballistic Radar Chronograph for about the same price, but it's 1/10 the size and weight and it never misses! I bought one and sold my LabRadar.
I had to chuckle when you said you were old enough to remember a consumer product in 1999. It’s all relative I guess. Thank you very much for the very nostalgic Polaroid pieces.
Polaroid is the poster child for corporate complacency. They were years ahead in digital photography at one point and just stuck with what worked, to their own demise.
Fairly certain that's Kodak you're talking about, as far as having some pretty good sensor technology and doing relatively little with it despite being first to market.
the 2, polaroid and kodak had new products in digital modes. they sat on their asses and did not pursue the future worth of the new cameras. always stuck in a position of complacency. they both could have been the amazon of photography. the competitors wasted no time selling digital cameras and products to fill that void.i mean when you can take 100 photos with your digital camera and get them printed at walmart for ~ 10.00 or download them to your computer to view/print at your discretion why bother with a polaroid camera using 10 shots of expensive film. my guess about 20.00 in today's money per cartridge. let's not forget the know it all relative ( every family has one of these jerks )who botched up many polaroid shots wasting film and money at precious family moments or events.
Polaroid, Kpdak, and... Xerox. They had all their market segments sewed up and sat still thinking that they were too big to fail, even though they had the technology and money to enter the digital age as the leaders. IBM, who gave birth to the digital age, did something similar in failing to see the burgeoning market for home computing and not shifting it's aim there instead of business computers. Like it or not, your business has to keep up with the times as they change or you're going to fail.
Respectfully, Kodak was a chemical company that made photographic film, and nearly every aspect of its operations were devoted to the manufacture of photochemicals. It’s not possible to turn a photochemical factory into a camera factory with comparable cost and profit. Even though they were THE name photography, their actual cameras have always been somewhat of an afterthought throughout history.
Polaroid sold many interesting products. They made one of the best copy stands available. They made colored polarizers, a film that gave you a high quality b/w negative and a print as well as the Vectograph process which was widely used during the WW2 for creating stereo photographs from aerial images. The process was invented by Joseph Mahler, cousin of the renowned conductor Gustav Mahler. Polaroid was an amazing company.
I never really saw the point of the domestic instant camera. But as a scientific photographer who studied sensitometry Polaroid film was both central to pre-digital applied photography and a delight to study the the beauty of its chemistry and engineering. The design of the emulation pack and processing layers is so clever and refined it deserves more recognition.
@@1967AJBWhat is more advertise-able: A scene of a family at the grand canyon using a polaroid camera and polaroid film or The same family but with a polaroid instant film camera: the dad takes a photo and it comes out in seconds while the camera zooms to the instantly developing film. It is a very advertise-able product, whether or not it is better than alternatives matters very little when the name of the game is getting mom and pop to buy the cool shiny thing they saw on T.V.
Ooh! I hope you'll consider continuing this series with the new film and camera products! And of course the history of The Impossible Project and re-establishment of the brand from the ground up that came in between the bankruptcy and now.
Yes please, and for more information about that Gilles can aks my wife, she works at the Impossible Project / Polaroid since 2018, from Berlin and now Amsterdam. The cameras and film keep getting better , although not cheaper 🤔
Great information - I received the Joycam in my childhood, as a Christmas gift in probably 2000/2001. Pulling the eject "ripcord" is a long-lost memory. You're correct that the materials quality is low, but it seemed appropriate for a child's "toy" camera. Later, my parents accidentally left mine on the ground while loading the car after vacation, where it was run over by the car & promptly shattered into pieces :)
I used the Izone camera- I think my Mom had it. I loved the teeny tiny pictures it produced. It was a fun novelty. Did not realize it was their very last camera. A bummer
I used my i-Zone to take pictures of friends at gunsmithing school to stick next to their contact info in an address book, since they were adhesive backed.
I loved my i-Zone camera 🥲 while you were doing your segment on it, I was thinking, "I hope he doesn't forget to mention how the photos had an adhesive back" and was not disappointed. Then I thought about how I used to make (very simple) model houses out of shoe boxes and other assorted stuff specifically because I wanted to use the photos I took as the art for the walls of the rooms. A nice little memory - thanks for the reminder!
It's interesting to think about the sort of world we'd be living in if digital had never really taken off. The Polaroid instant 35mm always springs to mind when I think about that
If digital had never taken off I'd probably still be developing and printing in my bathroom. Actually, by now, I'd probably have built myself a real darkroom.
Man, I love looking at Nat Geo mags from the 90s - that was the peak of film photography (and, also, Nat Geo tended to care about their printing, too). Interestingly, Harman (makers of Ilford black and white film) just released their Phoenix colour film (so named for...well, obvious reasons). It's the first new colour emulsion - as in, ground-up, clean-sheet-of-paper - in decades. And, I gotta say it looks...not great (to my eyes), but this is literally the very first colour film they've made, ever, with no input from anything else. Pentax just released its first film camera in 21 years - again, clean sheet of paper, not based on an existing design - and it's on back order around the world. In fact, it was on back order about a week after it was released. Film's coming back! Or, rather, it never really went anywhere - it just got crowded out.
Like the Polaroid pack film, the i-zone had the exposure count written on the pull tabs of the film. There was also a i-zone scanner that would scan your film into a computer for sharing online. It was essentially a mini flatbed scanner, the same size as the i-zone frame.
I remember in grade school during school picture day, when class picture was taken the photographer would snap a picture with the professional camera and do a Polaroid shot as well. That way the teacher had a reference to write down the names of students in correct order.
What about Polaroid today the company is still alive and kicking sell the NOW/NOW+, the GO and the Polaroid i-2, not to mention the Polaroid Printers, the LAB and Hi-Print.
I think it's wrong to consider Kodak a victim of complacency. Polaroid certainly was but not Kodak. Kodak invented the digital camera, and throughout the 90s, they were one of the only companies making professional grade DSLRs. Those professional cameras weren't the most profitable, and Kodak lacked the design expertise, so they were all converted Nikon film cameras with massive and impractical digital guts bolted on. As a result, Kodak left the professional market and moved into consumer digital cameras. It was the rise of camera phones that killed the market of early 2000's digital point-and-shoots, and with that dead, Kodak didn't have much left to go off of. Ironically they are doing rather well now selling film.
I had a Polaroid SUN instant camera growing up. 1 pack of film was $10 for 10 pictures. Pretty expensive. Needless to say, I can count on both hands how often I used it from 1986-2017 when I gave it to Goodwill last move
One control virtually all Polaroid cameras had was a manual darken/lighten control for exposure compensation. It would seem that the electronics in the later cameras would take care of this chore, but I think the reason was the pack to pack film speed variances inherent in their instant film. The lengths that Polaroid went to in their last few years is rather pitiful to watch, they were clutching at straws.
Watching Polaroid die was so depressing. Pictures got smaller and smaller, cost as much as older system images did with bigger images, and well, the cheapness of the plastic boxes could not be concealed with flashy, but sleazy designs. It was a long, long fall from the SX70, but they did finally reach the bottom. RIP Polaroid :-(
When it was obvious that digital was going to be the thing I was surprised that they kept on trying to push new versions of the old concept. IMHO they should have split the company in two, one to produce film and professional products, the other to make digital cameras where they were the one company with decades of experience making instantly viewable photos.
I truly love your video's, your work is both immensely interesting and informative, keep up the good work. It’s nice to have this little oasis of fun knowledge in a desert of mediocre videos.
I remember seeing someone use a Polaroid camera when I was a small child (in the mid-2000s). Despite digital cameras being a thing already, something about the picture appearing just felt like magic.
The I-zone one/the last one, I saw one at walmart that is simular in style to the full size rigid cameras in the first or second video but takes the small 1 by 2 inch film. Fujifilm instax Mini SE Instant Camera
I had an iZone as a child. Silver because it was the cheapest. I recall wanting it for what felt like quite a while? But given the classmates in school I showed it to, received in late 2000 used in 2001 sounds right. But possibly late 01 used in 02. So it could’ve been on bankruptcy clearance, or it could’ve been their last pre-bankruptcy holiday rush. I never got another pack of film besides the one it came with due to its price, then eventually due to its disappearance.
Wow, it's been a while since I've seen an iZone! I had one as a kid and absolutely loved it. There was even an iZone digital, which was extremely goofy. Instead of doing something cool like taking an instant and digital picture simultaneously through the same lens, they just slapped a really mediocre 0.3MP camera on top that looked like a tumor growing out of the film camera. Pretty good metaphor for the death of Polaroid to be honest.
I can understand them trying to be hip in the 90's with new cameras (Due to cost of film). The problem is I can't tell you how many people including my sister got a camera. Used it a few times and put it on a shelf. Another thing I could not understand (even Kodak and the new Polaroid did this.) remove the battery from the film pack. As for the printed paper printer. That was a great idea but once again felt more like a gimmick. One final note is that no matter what sales was slipping. So they should have closed down plants and consolidated I'm not a business person. But, you get the idea. Yes, I also know the new company had to develop s new formula. Also, look at how long Fuji continued to make pack film and how the new Polaroid begged to get the equipment from Fuji.
G'day, Ahhh, You missed one. In about 2000 or 2001 for my kids - who were 10 & 9 at the time ; I got them each a version of the last unit you showed in the Video. However the ones my kids had, were Blue & Green Cased, in transparent plastic ; and each of Instant Camera also featured a little (Hearing-Aid Battery powered) AM/FM Transistor Radio - built in. Did they not sell them in Kanadia ? Such is life, Have a good one... Stay safe. ;-p Ciao !
what pisses me the fuck off is the digital age made people so stupid to the rhythms in life that they didn't remember what the point of having to wait for things like pictures makes the pictures mean. only upon remembering that will anybody actually get why polaroid's version of instant is so important in ways digital can NEVER offer and people are stupider without
at wally world (walmart to you normal weirdos) theres a polaroid camera with the polaroid film buts its way overpriced the film alone varies from 70 to 100 dollars dont recall the camera price but it way overpriced too
One aspect of Polaroid photography that I never see mentioned, is that before the advent of digital photography, it was your only option if you wished to take photographs of an (ahem) extremely personal nature, that you did not wish to be processed in a lab. Likewise, the same would be true if you took photos of a criminal nature, or were themselves a crime.
The flipside of this is that Polaroids are almost unquestionable as evidence photos because it's nearly impossible to alter the images without it being very obvious. All other image formats- especially digital ones- can be rather easily altered and if it's done well enough that can be nearly impossible to detect. That's why all the apartment maintenance people used them to document damage on move-outs.
Indeed. I have some friends who had pictures taken of them that were simultaneously all three >.> By the local chief of police, of course, because there’s no better way to insulate yourself from local investigation…
@@P_RO_ it’s very easy to alter a polaroid if you know what you’re doing. obviously there are limits…but it’s fairly absurd to me that photographs are accepted as criminal evidence
Black and white is easy to develop. Color slides were also easy.
@@P_RO_ I actually have an old Polaroid that previously was used by my local sheriff's office for this very reason.
Here's another example: The Canadian company that makes and barely markets the LabRadar has sold the oversized Doppler Radar Chronograph for several years and it's price and large format form factor have remained unchanged for most of those years with little to no changes or upgrades. Then, out of the blue, Garmin comes on the scene with its own Ballistic Radar Chronograph for about the same price, but it's 1/10 the size and weight and it never misses! I bought one and sold my LabRadar.
13:03 - "Best-selling camera between 1999 and 2000". WOW! A popularity that spans two millennia!
The millennium did not start in 2000 because there was no year 0. It started in 2001. Yeah, I'm fun at parties.
@@anotheruser9876 That's ok; I'm just mis-quoting a Simpsons episode anyway. :)
@@CarletonTorpin D'Oh! 🤦♂
I had to chuckle when you said you were old enough to remember a consumer product in 1999. It’s all relative I guess. Thank you very much for the very nostalgic Polaroid pieces.
Polaroid is the poster child for corporate complacency. They were years ahead in digital photography at one point and just stuck with what worked, to their own demise.
Fairly certain that's Kodak you're talking about, as far as having some pretty good sensor technology and doing relatively little with it despite being first to market.
@@MultipleObjectSelector You are correct. I conflated the two corporations.
the 2, polaroid and kodak had new products in digital modes. they sat on their asses and did not pursue the future worth of the new cameras. always stuck in a position of complacency. they both could have been the amazon of photography. the competitors wasted no time selling digital cameras and products to fill that void.i mean when you can take 100 photos with your digital camera and get them printed at walmart for ~ 10.00 or download them to your computer to view/print at your discretion why bother with a polaroid camera using 10 shots of expensive film. my guess about 20.00 in today's money per cartridge. let's not forget the know it all relative ( every family has one of these jerks )who botched up many polaroid shots wasting film and money at precious family moments or events.
Polaroid, Kpdak, and... Xerox. They had all their market segments sewed up and sat still thinking that they were too big to fail, even though they had the technology and money to enter the digital age as the leaders. IBM, who gave birth to the digital age, did something similar in failing to see the burgeoning market for home computing and not shifting it's aim there instead of business computers. Like it or not, your business has to keep up with the times as they change or you're going to fail.
Respectfully, Kodak was a chemical company that made photographic film, and nearly every aspect of its operations were devoted to the manufacture of photochemicals. It’s not possible to turn a photochemical factory into a camera factory with comparable cost and profit. Even though they were THE name photography, their actual cameras have always been somewhat of an afterthought throughout history.
Never knew there was so much to the Polaroid story,thumbs up great video
Polaroid sold many interesting products. They made one of the best copy stands available. They made colored polarizers, a film that gave you a high quality b/w negative and a print as well as the Vectograph process which was widely used during the WW2 for creating stereo photographs from aerial images.
The process was invented by Joseph Mahler, cousin of the renowned conductor Gustav Mahler.
Polaroid was an amazing company.
Kind of sad to see a once-great company floundering around in their death throws like this.
I never really saw the point of the domestic instant camera. But as a scientific photographer who studied sensitometry Polaroid film was both central to pre-digital applied photography and a delight to study the the beauty of its chemistry and engineering. The design of the emulation pack and processing layers is so clever and refined it deserves more recognition.
Good advertising mainly
@@gregdaweson4657
I don’t understand your point.
@@1967AJBWhat is more advertise-able:
A scene of a family at the grand canyon using a polaroid camera and polaroid film
or
The same family but with a polaroid instant film camera: the dad takes a photo and it comes out in seconds while the camera zooms to the instantly developing film.
It is a very advertise-able product, whether or not it is better than alternatives matters very little when the name of the game is getting mom and pop to buy the cool shiny thing they saw on T.V.
The point of it is pretty obvious. You get the photo immediately instead of having to wait for processing.
Pre-digital the ‘point’ was of course home-made porn!
Ooh! I hope you'll consider continuing this series with the new film and camera products! And of course the history of The Impossible Project and re-establishment of the brand from the ground up that came in between the bankruptcy and now.
Yes please, and for more information about that Gilles can aks my wife, she works at the Impossible Project / Polaroid since 2018, from Berlin and now Amsterdam.
The cameras and film keep getting better , although not cheaper 🤔
Ok that intro was a banger 🤣🔥
Oh congrats on 100k! It's well deserved!
Great information - I received the Joycam in my childhood, as a Christmas gift in probably 2000/2001. Pulling the eject "ripcord" is a long-lost memory.
You're correct that the materials quality is low, but it seemed appropriate for a child's "toy" camera. Later, my parents accidentally left mine on the ground while loading the car after vacation, where it was run over by the car & promptly shattered into pieces :)
I used the Izone camera- I think my Mom had it. I loved the teeny tiny pictures it produced. It was a fun novelty. Did not realize it was their very last camera. A bummer
Always thrilled for a new episode about instant cameras
I used my i-Zone to take pictures of friends at gunsmithing school to stick next to their contact info in an address book, since they were adhesive backed.
Cop
I loved my i-Zone camera 🥲 while you were doing your segment on it, I was thinking, "I hope he doesn't forget to mention how the photos had an adhesive back" and was not disappointed. Then I thought about how I used to make (very simple) model houses out of shoe boxes and other assorted stuff specifically because I wanted to use the photos I took as the art for the walls of the rooms. A nice little memory - thanks for the reminder!
100k subs..and still criminally undersubbed! Keep 'em comin!
It's interesting to think about the sort of world we'd be living in if digital had never really taken off. The Polaroid instant 35mm always springs to mind when I think about that
If digital had never taken off I'd probably still be developing and printing in my bathroom. Actually, by now, I'd probably have built myself a real darkroom.
Man, I love looking at Nat Geo mags from the 90s - that was the peak of film photography (and, also, Nat Geo tended to care about their printing, too). Interestingly, Harman (makers of Ilford black and white film) just released their Phoenix colour film (so named for...well, obvious reasons). It's the first new colour emulsion - as in, ground-up, clean-sheet-of-paper - in decades. And, I gotta say it looks...not great (to my eyes), but this is literally the very first colour film they've made, ever, with no input from anything else.
Pentax just released its first film camera in 21 years - again, clean sheet of paper, not based on an existing design - and it's on back order around the world. In fact, it was on back order about a week after it was released.
Film's coming back! Or, rather, it never really went anywhere - it just got crowded out.
Hope you talk about the Impossible Project next, and also the Fujifilm Instax.
Like the Polaroid pack film, the i-zone had the exposure count written on the pull tabs of the film. There was also a i-zone scanner that would scan your film into a computer for sharing online. It was essentially a mini flatbed scanner, the same size as the i-zone frame.
I had a 600 and an i zone as a kid. I loved them.
You can still by 600 film
I remember in grade school during school picture day, when class picture was taken the photographer would snap a picture with the professional camera and do a Polaroid shot as well. That way the teacher had a reference to write down the names of students in correct order.
What about Polaroid today the company is still alive and kicking sell the NOW/NOW+, the GO and the Polaroid i-2, not to mention the Polaroid Printers, the LAB and Hi-Print.
True dat! 😉🖖
It’s not the same company. The intellectual property was purchased and another company operates using the old companies ip
Great vid, Gilles...👍
I think it's wrong to consider Kodak a victim of complacency. Polaroid certainly was but not Kodak. Kodak invented the digital camera, and throughout the 90s, they were one of the only companies making professional grade DSLRs. Those professional cameras weren't the most profitable, and Kodak lacked the design expertise, so they were all converted Nikon film cameras with massive and impractical digital guts bolted on. As a result, Kodak left the professional market and moved into consumer digital cameras. It was the rise of camera phones that killed the market of early 2000's digital point-and-shoots, and with that dead, Kodak didn't have much left to go off of.
Ironically they are doing rather well now selling film.
I had an iZone!!!! It was such a cool camera, but uhhh, I’m gonna need to talk about those exposed photos you used on the example 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I had a Polaroid SUN instant camera growing up. 1 pack of film was $10 for 10 pictures. Pretty expensive. Needless to say, I can count on both hands how often I used it from 1986-2017 when I gave it to Goodwill last move
On the next episode of Our Own Devices: "The M67 Hand Grenade"
Damnit Gilles, you are a gosh darn treasure
One control virtually all Polaroid cameras had was a manual darken/lighten control for exposure compensation. It would seem that the electronics in the later cameras would take care of this chore, but I think the reason was the pack to pack film speed variances inherent in their instant film. The lengths that Polaroid went to in their last few years is rather pitiful to watch, they were clutching at straws.
Watching Polaroid die was so depressing. Pictures got smaller and smaller, cost as much as older system images did with bigger images, and well, the cheapness of the plastic boxes could not be concealed with flashy, but sleazy designs. It was a long, long fall from the SX70, but they did finally reach the bottom. RIP Polaroid :-(
When it was obvious that digital was going to be the thing I was surprised that they kept on trying to push new versions of the old concept. IMHO they should have split the company in two, one to produce film and professional products, the other to make digital cameras where they were the one company with decades of experience making instantly viewable photos.
I remember having an i-zone as a kid. It was a fun toy at the time, but the small image size realy limited what you could do with it.
I truly love your video's, your work is both immensely interesting and informative, keep up the good work. It’s nice to have this little oasis of fun knowledge in a desert of mediocre videos.
I remember seeing someone use a Polaroid camera when I was a small child (in the mid-2000s). Despite digital cameras being a thing already, something about the picture appearing just felt like magic.
You cut to an image of a Fotomat when you mentioned "1 hour photo labs", but Fotomats weren't "1 hours photo labs"
Not in the beginning, but by the end they were
The I-zone one/the last one, I saw one at walmart that is simular in style to the full size rigid cameras in the first or second video but takes the small 1 by 2 inch film. Fujifilm instax Mini SE Instant Camera
I had an iZone as a child. Silver because it was the cheapest.
I recall wanting it for what felt like quite a while? But given the classmates in school I showed it to, received in late 2000 used in 2001 sounds right. But possibly late 01 used in 02. So it could’ve been on bankruptcy clearance, or it could’ve been their last pre-bankruptcy holiday rush.
I never got another pack of film besides the one it came with due to its price, then eventually due to its disappearance.
Wow, it's been a while since I've seen an iZone! I had one as a kid and absolutely loved it. There was even an iZone digital, which was extremely goofy. Instead of doing something cool like taking an instant and digital picture simultaneously through the same lens, they just slapped a really mediocre 0.3MP camera on top that looked like a tumor growing out of the film camera. Pretty good metaphor for the death of Polaroid to be honest.
I can understand them trying to be hip in the 90's with new cameras (Due to cost of film). The problem is I can't tell you how many people including my sister got a camera. Used it a few times and put it on a shelf. Another thing I could not understand (even Kodak and the new Polaroid did this.) remove the battery from the film pack. As for the printed paper printer. That was a great idea but once again felt more like a gimmick. One final note is that no matter what sales was slipping. So they should have closed down plants and consolidated I'm not a business person. But, you get the idea. Yes, I also know the new company had to develop s new formula. Also, look at how long Fuji continued to make pack film and how the new Polaroid begged to get the equipment from Fuji.
!00K subs! YAY!
keep on keeping on M Messier!
Thanks for such a succinct and interesting video!
I worked in a 1hr photo lab from ‘88-98 ironically we had to use Polaroid film for passport photos
the revival of polaroid by enthusiasts is amazing to me
FYI you forgot to include the links to the previous videos/playlist in the description.
Looking at some of the slr designs, i wish fuji instax would make something similar
G'day,
Ahhh,
You missed one.
In about 2000 or 2001 for my kids - who were 10 & 9 at the time ; I got them each a version of the last unit you showed in the Video.
However the ones my kids had, were Blue & Green Cased, in transparent plastic ; and each of Instant Camera also featured a little (Hearing-Aid Battery powered)
AM/FM Transistor Radio - built in.
Did they not sell them in
Kanadia ?
Such is life,
Have a good one...
Stay safe.
;-p
Ciao !
i made the mistake of buying a polaroid tv after the name got sold out. lasted 2-3 mo.
11:32!
Haha. Great catch!
Would have loved pack-film for my 4x5 view camera. But alas. To late. I will have to settle for Instax Wide and the Lomograflok back instead
Merci beaucoup!
How about polaroid backs for medium format cameras like the Hasselblad?
what pisses me the fuck off is the digital age made people so stupid to the rhythms in life that they didn't remember what the point of having to wait for things like pictures makes the pictures mean. only upon remembering that will anybody actually get why polaroid's version of instant is so important in ways digital can NEVER offer and people are stupider without
my parents have a captiva. gave up wiating for new film to be made a while ago
Photography moves from Germany and USA to Japan. Where next?
Hi Fred Anderson
👍👍👍👍👍
Surely you could find an original captiva pro at wukesong no? Huh?
best job i ever had!
I still hear Gin, not Gilles.
The popshots looks like a toy!
TT.
The end of the Land (Camera).
Polaroid name is bought by old workers at the impossible project
I had an i zone my ex wife bought it I think we ran a single pack of film out of it
I see from your intro that you’ve never thrown a live grenade before. 😊
at wally world (walmart to you normal weirdos) theres a polaroid camera with the polaroid film buts its way overpriced the film alone varies from 70 to 100 dollars dont recall the camera price but it way overpriced too
At my walmart i can get polaroid film for about 20 usd $ dam your wally world are really marking up the price
@@briansegarra9312 this was about a year ago and yes i live in an expensive town everything here is over priced