@26:00 Ami ji, i m starting to adore u so much, everytime i listen a new line from ur mouth or repeat listing to the same thing again, give me emence plesure. Thank you for writting books and for all ur podcasts. Amj ji, please make me ur student pleaee.
Ami Ji is Very Animating, Lively and Cheerful. 💥💫She is Vivacious. 👍❤ Her Dainty Smile and Sublimation (Gestures) also help to Understand and get Engaged💐💐
Amiji maharshi vyas ke baad Mahabharat ko apne hi bahut acche se samjaya hai iske liye Dhanvad 🙏🙏🙏Ho sake to Bhagwat puran ko bhi aise hi samjaye kyuki kuch kathakar ise acche se nahi batate hai 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you mam i have read all of your 3 books and i am really blessed that i came to know about you mam through a podcast.Also i have many wrong concepts about Ramayana and Mahabharata but after reading all of your books my all wrong concepts were cleared.Thank you Ami Mam🙏
Ma'am aapne Mahabharata ke bare mai kai chize bataiye hai and i love to listen you... Ek chiz subhadra aur arjun cousins the phir vhi unki shadi hui is chiz ke bare mai bataiye pls..
Pray the Values of Sri Krishna -Niti Satya Dharm- OneDivinityInAll unites OneNationIndiaSri Krishna needs Sri Shakti to be Complete,Give More for GreaterGood. Win Good vs Evil Battles of Life.Respect Women Men only on Merit of Behavior Ideas Action
Dharm: Swadharma Surye pahe..Pasaaydaan Saint Gyaneshwar..know Self well..follow that fulfill that Role given accto one's swat analysis strengths weaknesses...Varna
Rituals..journey from sagun to Nirgun..form to formless ...whatever instills niti Nyay satya swa dharma ..pasaaydaan ...do it.rituals,bhajans meditation or manann chintann recharge..ultimate is ur behavior each moment..
Just read Mahabharata Unravelled Part 1 only thing I missed is about Karna's wife and his sons, by whom they got killed and with whom they fought in the war
Mam balkand k 4 sarg par kuch doubt ho raha h. Woh lagta h baad m likhkar add kiya gaya hoga. What do you think about it. May be valmiki ji ne hi kiya ho
The Gita presents a tapestry of paradoxes-its notions on sin, caste, the immortality of the soul, and Krishna's own arrogance are, at times, bewildering. Krishna, who never provides direct answers, is both a cosmic god and a charioteer, doomed to fail in protecting his own clan, his wives, and even his grand assertions. And yet, it is precisely this absurdity, this blend of the profound and the ridiculous, that makes the Gita so captivating. It is a text that delights in its contradictions, portraying an infallible Krishna amidst a backdrop of glaring flaws and failures...Essentially, everything she mentioned about the Gita can be refuted by the very words of the Gita and the divinity of Krishna himself. Krishna declared that what must happen has already been ordained, and that all castes, qualities, gunas, and traits are predetermined by him. Thus, everything else is merely an illusion,. and if everything unfolds according to His will, why should not one just remain silent and patiently wait? what's wrong in that? Why does Krishna implore Arjuna to fight, to slay his enemies, and to seek glory, whether in this life or the next? This seems contradictory, especially when considering Krishna's teachings on rituals, the role of the Vedas, the worship of deities, and the concept of desireless action. How can these teachings align with Krishna urging Arjuna to desire victory and pursue it with such fervor?
You don't have the understanding to get what gita delivers, so you are blaming krishna to be indirect? To understand the gita, one should be sattvik and learn it from a right person or guru, not yourself
@@prachipathak6194 The Bhagavad Gita makes numerous assertions, such as the idea that rain occurs because of yajnas (sacred rites) and that souls are indestructible-claims that are clearly not scientific. Much like some Islamic and Christian apologists, certain ardent followers of Hinduism assert the necessity of gurus to interpret these teachings. These gurus often emphasize Krishna's simultaneously divine and humanized nature and insist on the existence of the soul as a scientific fact while conveniently ignoring aspects like casteism and the inherent contradictions in Krishna's teachings. For instance, during the killing of Drona, Krishna advises the Pandavas to forsake Dharma, which is overlooked because it doesn't align with the agenda being promoted. The Gita frequently encourages surrendering one's intellect and reasoning to Krishna, suggesting that there is no source of knowledge other than him. It proposes a hierarchy where all actions are inferior to knowledge, knowledge is inferior to meditation, and meditation is inferior to unquestioning devotion. It even suggests that the most heinous criminals can find redemption in the next life simply by reading the Gita and remembering Krishna. The Gita's direct teachings can be problematic, and its indirect implications can be even more so. Understanding religious scriptures, in my view, doesn't require the guidance of a guru in the same way that studying legitimate scientific disciplines does-unless, of course, the goal is to be indoctrinated into the acceptance of that faith's or sect's specific teachings.
I disagree The Bhagavad Gita emphasizes the importance of dharma (duty or righteousness). Krishna advises Arjuna to fight because it is his dharma as a warrior (Kshatriya) to uphold justice and righteousness. The idea is that performing one's duty is crucial, even if it involves conflict. The call to action is not a contradiction but a reaffirmation of one's role and responsibilities. Krishna outlines different paths to spiritual liberation, including the path of knowledge (Jnana Yoga), the path of devotion (Bhakti Yoga), and the path of selfless action (Karma Yoga). The advice to Arjuna to fight is rooted in Karma Yoga, which focuses on performing actions selflessly, without attachment to the results. Krishna’s teaching is that one should act according to their nature and duty without selfish desires influencing their actions. The Gita discusses the concept of Maya (illusion) to help explain the nature of the material world. The idea that everything is an illusion does not negate the importance of righteous action. Instead, it emphasizes that while worldly phenomena are transient, the actions performed according to one's duty have spiritual significance and contribute to one's growth. Krishna’s divine nature does not imply that he is immune to the human experience or that his guidance should be interpreted as lacking in practical wisdom. The contradictions perceived are often reconcilable when considering Krishna’s teachings as a way to navigate the complex nature of existence and duty. Krishna’s teachings on desireless action (Nishkama Karma) encourage performing one's duties without attachment to personal gain. While Krishna urges Arjuna to fight and seek glory, this is to be done with a sense of detachment from the outcome. This duality is central to the Gita’s message, advocating that one can pursue their duties and aspirations while maintaining spiritual equanimity. Bhagavad Gita’s seeming contradictions often reflect its deep and multifaceted nature.
@@aumkatbamna126 i respect your views. however, Krishna advocates for actions performed without attachment to their outcomes, demanding unwavering devotion and endorsing philosophies that align with caste-based views, including the designation of women, Vaishyas, and Shudras as 'Papayoni' or of lower birth. His emphasis on the concept of the soul appears disconnected from our contemporary understanding of human anatomy, psychology, and life, where the idea of a soul holds no place in scientific discourse. Even Buddhism, which discusses the cycles of birth, rebirth, and reincarnation, explicitly rejects the notion of a soul. Krishna insists that one's intellect should be surrendered to him, advocating for adherence to scriptures while paradoxically dismissing the rituals prescribed by the Vedas-the very texts that form the foundation of the moral framework within Sanatana Dharma. The central theme of the *Mahabharata* revolves around war and reclaiming the kingdom from the Kauravas, a goal clearly tied to specific outcomes, contradicting the notion of detachment from results or 'nishkama karma'. Given these contradictions, what, then, is Krishna truly advocating for?
@26:00 Ami ji, i m starting to adore u so much, everytime i listen a new line from ur mouth or repeat listing to the same thing again, give me emence plesure. Thank you for writting books and for all ur podcasts.
Amj ji, please make me ur student pleaee.
आपका ज्ञान बहुत समृद्ध है ।
She’s so relatable for today’s era! Sooo relevant!
Ami Ji is Very Animating, Lively and Cheerful. 💥💫She is Vivacious. 👍❤
Her Dainty Smile and Sublimation (Gestures) also help to Understand and get Engaged💐💐
Excited to meet you in Toronto on 24th
જય શ્રી કૃષ્ણ 🙏🏼
।।जय श्री राम।।🚩🚩
I always admires Amiji she always explain every dobts
Vyasa Mahabharatha understood in all contexts by Ami ji
Amiji maharshi vyas ke baad Mahabharat ko apne hi bahut acche se samjaya hai iske liye Dhanvad 🙏🙏🙏Ho sake to Bhagwat puran ko bhi aise hi samjaye kyuki kuch kathakar ise acche se nahi batate hai 🙏🙏🙏🙏
You are doing great job sir. Thank you🙏
Great podcast keep growing
Thank you mam i have read all of your 3 books and i am really blessed that i came to know about you mam through a podcast.Also i have many wrong concepts about Ramayana and Mahabharata but after reading all of your books my all wrong concepts were cleared.Thank you Ami Mam🙏
Beyond excellent video. Ami ji when is your next trip to US. Would definitely plan to meet you.
Ma'am aapne Mahabharata ke bare mai kai chize bataiye hai and i love to listen you...
Ek chiz subhadra aur arjun cousins the phir vhi unki shadi hui is chiz ke bare mai bataiye pls..
Is there any reference of योगवाशिष्ठ in रामायण..?
Ami ji is talking about thebDanish mzan Angus Maddisen, who wrote on a millennial perspective of world economy
Pray the Values of Sri Krishna -Niti Satya Dharm- OneDivinityInAll unites OneNationIndiaSri Krishna needs Sri Shakti to be Complete,Give More for GreaterGood. Win Good vs Evil Battles of Life.Respect Women Men only on Merit of Behavior Ideas Action
Dharm: Swadharma Surye pahe..Pasaaydaan Saint Gyaneshwar..know Self well..follow that fulfill that Role given accto one's swat analysis strengths weaknesses...Varna
Amazing podcast! Small suggestion- please remove the sound that randomly comes during the podcast.
Could you please improve the video quality, I can only see it in the 360px quality
Rituals..journey from sagun to Nirgun..form to formless ...whatever instills niti Nyay satya swa dharma ..pasaaydaan ...do it.rituals,bhajans meditation or manann chintann recharge..ultimate is ur behavior each moment..
Amiji i am gujrati too and i must say you are more enrich with sastr gyan than jihadi morari
Please make a video on aswathamma 🙏
Just read Mahabharata Unravelled Part 1 only thing I missed is about Karna's wife and his sons, by whom they got killed and with whom they fought in the war
Ami ji, whats ur opinion on the film Kalki, recently watched on Netflix.
Just fiction
Your opinions on daily soap like Mahabharata 2013 and radha krishn
Mam balkand k 4 sarg par kuch doubt ho raha h. Woh lagta h baad m likhkar add kiya gaya hoga. What do you think about it. May be valmiki ji ne hi kiya ho
@Only1INDRAJIT
Jaki rahi bhavana jaisi. Prabhu murti dekhi tin taisi. Also people can only understand that much according to their IQ, mind.
The Gita presents a tapestry of paradoxes-its notions on sin, caste, the immortality of the soul, and Krishna's own arrogance are, at times, bewildering. Krishna, who never provides direct answers, is both a cosmic god and a charioteer, doomed to fail in protecting his own clan, his wives, and even his grand assertions. And yet, it is precisely this absurdity, this blend of the profound and the ridiculous, that makes the Gita so captivating. It is a text that delights in its contradictions, portraying an infallible Krishna amidst a backdrop of glaring flaws and failures...Essentially, everything she mentioned about the Gita can be refuted by the very words of the Gita and the divinity of Krishna himself. Krishna declared that what must happen has already been ordained, and that all castes, qualities, gunas, and traits are predetermined by him. Thus, everything else is merely an illusion,. and if everything unfolds according to His will, why should not one just remain silent and patiently wait? what's wrong in that? Why does Krishna implore Arjuna to fight, to slay his enemies, and to seek glory, whether in this life or the next? This seems contradictory, especially when considering Krishna's teachings on rituals, the role of the Vedas, the worship of deities, and the concept of desireless action. How can these teachings align with Krishna urging Arjuna to desire victory and pursue it with such fervor?
You don't have the understanding to get what gita delivers, so you are blaming krishna to be indirect? To understand the gita, one should be sattvik and learn it from a right person or guru, not yourself
@@prachipathak6194 The Bhagavad Gita makes numerous assertions, such as the idea that rain occurs because of yajnas (sacred rites) and that souls are indestructible-claims that are clearly not scientific. Much like some Islamic and Christian apologists, certain ardent followers of Hinduism assert the necessity of gurus to interpret these teachings. These gurus often emphasize Krishna's simultaneously divine and humanized nature and insist on the existence of the soul as a scientific fact while conveniently ignoring aspects like casteism and the inherent contradictions in Krishna's teachings. For instance, during the killing of Drona, Krishna advises the Pandavas to forsake Dharma, which is overlooked because it doesn't align with the agenda being promoted.
The Gita frequently encourages surrendering one's intellect and reasoning to Krishna, suggesting that there is no source of knowledge other than him. It proposes a hierarchy where all actions are inferior to knowledge, knowledge is inferior to meditation, and meditation is inferior to unquestioning devotion. It even suggests that the most heinous criminals can find redemption in the next life simply by reading the Gita and remembering Krishna.
The Gita's direct teachings can be problematic, and its indirect implications can be even more so. Understanding religious scriptures, in my view, doesn't require the guidance of a guru in the same way that studying legitimate scientific disciplines does-unless, of course, the goal is to be indoctrinated into the acceptance of that faith's or sect's specific teachings.
I disagree
The Bhagavad Gita emphasizes the importance of dharma (duty or righteousness). Krishna advises Arjuna to fight because it is his dharma as a warrior (Kshatriya) to uphold justice and righteousness. The idea is that performing one's duty is crucial, even if it involves conflict. The call to action is not a contradiction but a reaffirmation of one's role and responsibilities.
Krishna outlines different paths to spiritual liberation, including the path of knowledge (Jnana Yoga), the path of devotion (Bhakti Yoga), and the path of selfless action (Karma Yoga). The advice to Arjuna to fight is rooted in Karma Yoga, which focuses on performing actions selflessly, without attachment to the results. Krishna’s teaching is that one should act according to their nature and duty without selfish desires influencing their actions.
The Gita discusses the concept of Maya (illusion) to help explain the nature of the material world. The idea that everything is an illusion does not negate the importance of righteous action. Instead, it emphasizes that while worldly phenomena are transient, the actions performed according to one's duty have spiritual significance and contribute to one's growth.
Krishna’s divine nature does not imply that he is immune to the human experience or that his guidance should be interpreted as lacking in practical wisdom. The contradictions perceived are often reconcilable when considering Krishna’s teachings as a way to navigate the complex nature of existence and duty.
Krishna’s teachings on desireless action (Nishkama Karma) encourage performing one's duties without attachment to personal gain. While Krishna urges Arjuna to fight and seek glory, this is to be done with a sense of detachment from the outcome. This duality is central to the Gita’s message, advocating that one can pursue their duties and aspirations while maintaining spiritual equanimity.
Bhagavad Gita’s seeming contradictions often reflect its deep and multifaceted nature.
@@aumkatbamna126 i respect your views. however, Krishna advocates for actions performed without attachment to their outcomes, demanding unwavering devotion and endorsing philosophies that align with caste-based views, including the designation of women, Vaishyas, and Shudras as 'Papayoni' or of lower birth. His emphasis on the concept of the soul appears disconnected from our contemporary understanding of human anatomy, psychology, and life, where the idea of a soul holds no place in scientific discourse. Even Buddhism, which discusses the cycles of birth, rebirth, and reincarnation, explicitly rejects the notion of a soul. Krishna insists that one's intellect should be surrendered to him, advocating for adherence to scriptures while paradoxically dismissing the rituals prescribed by the Vedas-the very texts that form the foundation of the moral framework within Sanatana Dharma.
The central theme of the *Mahabharata* revolves around war and reclaiming the kingdom from the Kauravas, a goal clearly tied to specific outcomes, contradicting the notion of detachment from results or 'nishkama karma'. Given these contradictions, what, then, is Krishna truly advocating for?
Krishna bhagvan ne ungli par govrdhan kaise uthaya this is truth. ??? And sudarsan chakra is realy on small finger
Would you like to clear my doubts.
Is yes then plz give some time.
Thanks.
what r doubts ?
Hello