I have a 2016 GT, and just paid it off! It's stock except for tire upgrade (went through the factory p-zeros in 12k miles), but it's nice to see some real N/A options out there. Forced induction is expensive if you don't have $8-$13K to spend. I'm curious to see how far your team can go with this N/A GT without breaking the car or the bank. Great video!
2 questions: 1) what fuel was in the car for the "before" run and "after" run? (IE 91, 93, etc) 2) why does the "before" dyno curve shut down at 6300rpm?
I no longer have it but my 2015 Mustang GT auto, with a Circle D 3800 stall, CAI, GT350i, 1 3/4” headers, no cats, full exhaust on E85 made 464rwhp/400rwrq SAE. Now it had a full stop the hop rear suspension from Steeda and on tires, ran a 10.97@127. I want to say my tuner tuned a manual car with similar mods and he made 20 peak rwhp more, similar tq.
@camarosaregay7943 not on stock bottom end you'd have to have a super high compression setup more than factory compression anyways. With a ported cj and cams you can easily see 520+ rwhp on e85 with a stock head and stock bottom end gen 2. If you had ported heads you might see more I doubt 550 though. Don't get hung up on numbers though a 520 rwhp na gen 2 is gonna move tf out.
The dyno sheet tells a very important story here regardless of the peak gains. The vehicle sees a substantial power increase under the curve from 4000 rpm up that changes the way the car drives dramatically. A street car spends most of it's time far away from the peak numbers. Especially Coyote cars that see peak power over 7k RPM. From red light to red light and your every day driving, your car lives in the mid range of it's RPM capabilities and that entire RPM range saw improvement as well as a much smoother curve in general. All of this to say, the car drives much better across the entirety of the RPM range, is much more responsive, AND picked up 30 rwhp/22 lb-ft of torque on the peaks. The graph can be seen at 2:27 and you can see the difference in the curves.
All what? Ported manifold and a tune? Lol. That is amazing gains ecsp for an na car. Did you even look at the dyno graph? The difference here is pretty big and the car is gonna be significantly faster after those 3 simple mods (intake tune and ported 18). It picked up big on hp and tq all through the mid range from 3800 on up to 7000+ plus you have an extended power curve. The average power through a run has been drastically increased. When people focus on peak power they miss most of the story. Stop focusing on peak power. But imo even if you just look at peak 30 wheel is significant for those mods imo what are you expecting from a cold air, ported 18 and tune 100+ rwhp? You're welcome to stay stock and get gapped by cars running simple mods like these. 👍
![ATEEZ(에이티즈) - [GOLDEN HOUR : Part.2] Preview](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X4PfgRPBUVo/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for checking out the video! What's should we do next to JD's car?
VMPPerformance headers and e85
@@whereisrvggie Noted!
Retrofit Odin to it
Now it makes basically as much power as a 10 speed 5.0 coyote but for way less
Did this car get the IRMC lockout or it kept them on with the adapter?
Kept them functional via our adapter harnesses.
I have a 2016 GT, and just paid it off! It's stock except for tire upgrade (went through the factory p-zeros in 12k miles), but it's nice to see some real N/A options out there. Forced induction is expensive if you don't have $8-$13K to spend. I'm curious to see how far your team can go with this N/A GT without breaking the car or the bank. Great video!
i just need sponsor so i can build mine 16 pp1
Well done, Some headers and it will be a 440 whp vehicle
We'll get there shortly. Going to be a fun little daily!
@@VMPPerformanceTV 100%, that be cool if u can get it on dyno aswell.
2 questions:
1) what fuel was in the car for the "before" run and "after" run? (IE 91, 93, etc)
2) why does the "before" dyno curve shut down at 6300rpm?
Are you selling any ported 18 manifold for 15-17 GTs?
When can we see a power pack for the 2018 nd up mustang gt's?
Here's a link for our Stage 1 Power Pack for the 18+ www.vmpperformance.com/2018-Mustang-GT-Stage-1-Power-Pack-SCT-X4-JLT-intake
I no longer have it but my 2015 Mustang GT auto, with a Circle D 3800 stall, CAI, GT350i, 1 3/4” headers, no cats, full exhaust on E85 made 464rwhp/400rwrq SAE. Now it had a full stop the hop rear suspension from Steeda and on tires, ran a 10.97@127. I want to say my tuner tuned a manual car with similar mods and he made 20 peak rwhp more, similar tq.
Great numbers!
if you are gonna take off that intake manifold..might as well slap a gen3 on it!
Are there any VMP installers in California?
how much would that same setup make with e85 and headers?
It's tough to say due to the number of variables. Wouldn't be surprised to see 450 or more with good fuel, a good tune, and a well maintained car.
@@VMPPerformanceTV Can u hit 550 wheel na on a gen 2?
@@camarosaregay7943 no you can get 500 with cams but not 550 to the wheel
@@camarosaregay7943 not with out head and cam work or a shot of Nos
@camarosaregay7943 not on stock bottom end you'd have to have a super high compression setup more than factory compression anyways. With a ported cj and cams you can easily see 520+ rwhp on e85 with a stock head and stock bottom end gen 2. If you had ported heads you might see more I doubt 550 though. Don't get hung up on numbers though a 520 rwhp na gen 2 is gonna move tf out.
all that for 30 extra hp? i dont think is worth it.
The dyno sheet tells a very important story here regardless of the peak gains. The vehicle sees a substantial power increase under the curve from 4000 rpm up that changes the way the car drives dramatically. A street car spends most of it's time far away from the peak numbers. Especially Coyote cars that see peak power over 7k RPM. From red light to red light and your every day driving, your car lives in the mid range of it's RPM capabilities and that entire RPM range saw improvement as well as a much smoother curve in general.
All of this to say, the car drives much better across the entirety of the RPM range, is much more responsive, AND picked up 30 rwhp/22 lb-ft of torque on the peaks. The graph can be seen at 2:27 and you can see the difference in the curves.
All what? Ported manifold and a tune? Lol. That is amazing gains ecsp for an na car. Did you even look at the dyno graph? The difference here is pretty big and the car is gonna be significantly faster after those 3 simple mods (intake tune and ported 18). It picked up big on hp and tq all through the mid range from 3800 on up to 7000+ plus you have an extended power curve. The average power through a run has been drastically increased. When people focus on peak power they miss most of the story. Stop focusing on peak power. But imo even if you just look at peak 30 wheel is significant for those mods imo what are you expecting from a cold air, ported 18 and tune 100+ rwhp? You're welcome to stay stock and get gapped by cars running simple mods like these. 👍
Do you guys have any dealers and installers in canada?
Do shorty headers make any noticeable power at all?
cuteshadowKIA not really, nowadays oem headers flow just as well as they can so shortys really aren’t necessary
WORST online customer service
Angie, you haven't responded to our last message. One of our folks has responded to you on March 20th.
@@VMPPerformanceTV hahahahah