I think you have escaped the simplification for acceleration component . That's the point where I need to comprehend the final form of acceleration component.
Thank you very much for your nice explanation. Anyway, something is very clear here. For higher dimensions and for relative motion vectors and tensors for curvilinear coordinates is almost impossible. One now understand why Euler, Lagrange and Hamilton use another ideas to simplify this!!!
I think you have escaped the simplification for acceleration component . That's the point where I need to comprehend the final form of acceleration component.
Thank you very much for your nice explanation. Anyway, something is very clear here. For higher dimensions and for relative motion vectors and tensors for curvilinear coordinates is almost impossible. One now understand why Euler, Lagrange and Hamilton use another ideas to simplify this!!!
Thank you Love from India
You sir are a lifesaver
Thank You.
Good explanation ..thank you sir!
Thanks, the last term of the acceleration you need to write r*sin(theta)*dd(phi) instead of rdd(phi).
the phi component of acceleration needs to have r*sin(theta)*dd(phi) as the first term not just r*dd(phi)
Accilaration darivative explanation ware
great video
Thank you!
there can't be any r with the sin theta at 10:50
true
a lil wrong somewhere check
धन्यवाद सर ,आप ने बहुत अच्छा बताया ,
thank you sir , you gives good explanation.
thank u
Screen is not clear
اريد ترجمة بالعربي ماكاعد افهم