Monte-Carlo Propagation of Uncertainty

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
  • How do the uncertainties in measurements affect the uncertainty in the result? There are many ways to deal with this problem, but this Monte-Carlo technique is easy and very effective.

Комментарии • 36

  • @tylerjones6918
    @tylerjones6918 3 года назад +3

    Simple and clean explanation, thank you!

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  3 года назад

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @shiyunqiu8228
    @shiyunqiu8228 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much. This video is very clear and informative!

  • @ItisAbuTDMM
    @ItisAbuTDMM 2 года назад +2

    Nice Tutorial. Thanks!

  • @ricardodealmeida5485
    @ricardodealmeida5485 3 года назад +2

    Great video. Thank you!

  • @benyaminhr
    @benyaminhr 4 года назад +1

    Thanks

  • @ajphysicsdomain5429
    @ajphysicsdomain5429 4 года назад +1

    Good job...👌

  • @stephenpuryear
    @stephenpuryear 4 года назад +1

    Steve this is a great start! Could you illustrate Monte Carlo components that are also correlated?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  3 года назад +1

      I guess you could try something like this: math.stackexchange.com/questions/163470/generating-correlated-random-numbers-why-does-cholesky-decomposition-work

  • @a.n.m.taufiqelahi5895
    @a.n.m.taufiqelahi5895 Год назад

    Great video! Thank you very much! How to calculate the percent contribution from each variable while using Monte Carlo propagation?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  Год назад

      I suppose you could dial back the variance of the other variables to see the effect of only one. Is that what you mean?

  • @pmale90
    @pmale90 3 года назад +1

    but, what if data is not normally distributed (non Gaussian) ?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  3 года назад +1

      Then it depends. A gaussian is just a reasonable guess that's easy to generate (and suggested by the central limit theorem). If you know what the distribution is, just use that instead. If you don't, and you have reason to believe it's not gaussian, then you're in tough spot.

  • @mohamedibrahim1836
    @mohamedibrahim1836 Год назад

    First, the statstical sampling way is more generative than the quadratic rule that is over simplification. But I also wonder have you thought of sampling from a multivariable covariance distribution instead of single independent?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  Год назад +1

      Yes, I think I replied to a question about that in the comments earlier. You can certainly do it! However, this activity is for sophomore students, just learning about random numbers and estimating uncertainty, so that's really out of scope for this particular video.

    • @mohamedibrahim1836
      @mohamedibrahim1836 Год назад

      @@sspickle Thanks for reply, also thanks for the clear tutorial :)

  • @firassami7399
    @firassami7399 3 года назад

    Thanks for providing the excellent expains
    I just wanna ask you about the distribution. It is not normal distribution. If you repeat the run 100 times and every time you can calculate the mean . Finaly you will have 100 mean values and then you could plot the histogram. This way you will get normal distribution and could give you more accurate results...do you agree with me ?

    • @ricardodealmeida5485
      @ricardodealmeida5485 3 года назад +1

      I think that you're referring to the central limit theorem right? I don't think it applies here because if you repeat the run 100 with the same values, it will produce the same distribution, no? If so, then the summary statistics won't be meaningful.

  • @Sky-lw5pr
    @Sky-lw5pr 2 года назад

    Why do you put 2*rhoMC.std() instead of just rhoMC.std() at the end? where did the 2 came from?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  2 года назад +3

      Well, assuming a normal distribution a 95% confidence interval is +/- 2*sigma. Note that it's clearly *not* a normal distribution but this will give a rough estimate of the interval. You could do better by computing the cumulative distribution and searching for the 2.5% and 97.5% limits, but I didn't go into such things in this video. Maybe that would be a good follow up sometime?

  • @KoiKen8
    @KoiKen8 3 года назад

    Thank you! Great explanation! I’m doing my bachelor’s thesis on this topic. Do you know any good bibliography on the theory behind these Montecarlo methods for error propagation? It would be of great help

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  3 года назад

      Sorry, I really don't! Sorry. If you find something good, let me know! I can add a link to the description.

  • @abdulrahmansalem9660
    @abdulrahmansalem9660 Год назад

    hello, thank you so much for your video, so are there different codes between Python and Matlab??

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  Год назад +1

      I'm not a Matlab user, but I'm sure there are corresponding features of Matlab that would accomplish the same result.

    • @abdulrahmansalem9660
      @abdulrahmansalem9660 Год назад

      @@sspickle Thank you and I appreciate it.

  • @cengizhancengiz1919
    @cengizhancengiz1919 11 месяцев назад

    interesting, I think i missing something in my code... each time I run my code, i get a different plot. Is not supposed to be consistent with the plot but have variable ranges?

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  11 месяцев назад +1

      How many points are you using? If it's a small number you would expect some variation.

    • @cengizhancengiz1919
      @cengizhancengiz1919 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@sspickle ​ makes sense! my familiarity with Python is not high, so I forgot to specify the bins=np.linespace(5,20,21) part after asking for pl.hist(rhoMC). Thank you kindly. Also, I'm assigned to develop an MC analysis for development schedule predictions and figured Python would be a good tool to use. Do you have any recommendations on what to prioritize when exploring Python to develop this analysis tool? Your advice is much appreciated

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  11 месяцев назад

      I would start with pandas, numpy, and scipy but there are many others!
      @@cengizhancengiz1919

  • @vishalsaini5021
    @vishalsaini5021 2 года назад

    Sir..I want to calculate the uncertainty of solar radiation data of 8760 hours with the help of Monte Carlo Simulation in MATLAB.... Please guide me on how to achieve the same

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  2 года назад

      Sorry, I have no idea what you mean by this. Also, I'm not a MATLAB user, so I can't really help with that.

    • @vishalsaini5021
      @vishalsaini5021 2 года назад

      Dear Steve is it possible to calculate uncertainty associated with solar radiation data using Monte Carlo Simulation in MS Excel

  • @sergiomiguellopezramirez5670
    @sergiomiguellopezramirez5670 4 года назад

    Could you please share your Jupiter notebook, you really nailed it...!

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  4 года назад

      Check this repo: github.com/sspickle/instrumentation-projects and see the file: proj7/MCPropagationOfUncertainty.ipynb

    • @toivosamuelmabote9395
      @toivosamuelmabote9395 3 года назад

      @@sspickle Thanks

    • @sspickle
      @sspickle  3 года назад +1

      @@toivosamuelmabote9395 github.com/sspickle/instrumentation-projects/blob/master/proj7/MCPropagationOfUncertainty.ipynb