Avebury Henge - the history books are wrong

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июн 2023
  • In this video, I visit Avebury Henge and Stone Circle ... the largest in the world 🤩 Built and much altered during the Neolithic period, roughly between 2850 BC and 2200 BC, the henge survives as a huge circular bank and ditch, encircling an area that includes part of Avebury village. Within the henge is the largest stone circle in Britain - originally of about 100 stones - which in turn encloses two smaller stone circles.
    The history books state it was built for ceremonial purposes, but they forget to take into account the geological data. If they did, they would have known that much of the area was under water at that time.
    Thanks goes to Robert John Langdon @RobertJohnLangdon for his fascinating in-depth research and publications. Please spend a moment to check out his channel.
    More info: tinyurl.com/bthzebvh
    Google Maps: tinyurl.com/6bujvvvn
    Channel Links:
    RUclips : tinyurl.com/ehjcty8s
    Kuula : tinyurl.com/4jykxcwf
    Instagram : tinyurl.com/3cfe7db4
    Twitter : tinyurl.com/yrjtc4yf
    SOFTWARE:
    - Adobe Photoshop
    - Adobe Premiere Pro
    - Adobe Media Encoder
    - OBS Studio
    - QGIS Desktop
    - Planlauf Terrain
    - Google Earth Pro
    - Sketchup Pro
    - V-Ray
    - Gyroflow
    HARDWARE:
    - DJI FPV
    - DJI Avata
    - DJI Mini 3 Pro
    - DJI Pocket 2 Camera
    - DJI Wireless Mic Transmitter
    - Insta360 X3
    - Rode Wireless Go Mic
    - PolarPro Cinema Series Filter Vivid Collection
    - PolarPro Vivid Filter Collection
    - Freewell Long Exposure Series Filters
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 368

  • @RobertJohnLangdon-author
    @RobertJohnLangdon-author 11 месяцев назад +40

    Yet another brilliant professional video (with even more VR animations) well done my friend) 😊

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +6

      Thanks Bob, that really means a lot coming from the man himself 🙇‍♂ I couldn't have done this without your research and detailed knowledge of the area. Keep up the great work mate 👏

    • @mikeballen
      @mikeballen Месяц назад +2

      Mario buildreps does any watch this guy very swift

    • @helenamcginty4920
      @helenamcginty4920 22 дня назад +1

      The video is lovely. Pity the commentary is more folk tale the history. But hey. 😊

  • @cannyexplorer5357
    @cannyexplorer5357 Месяц назад +38

    I’ve always preferred to visit Avebury than Stonehenge as it more visitor friendly. It has a better atmosphere too.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +4

      I couldn't agree more. Stonhenge has become to commercialised over the years. Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @barrywest2170
      @barrywest2170 Месяц назад +2

      Definitely agree with you Avebury is by far the better place to visit very hands on and friendly a really gentle energy which always leaves you feeling spiritually enriched

    • @kristiangustafson4130
      @kristiangustafson4130 27 дней назад +1

      I host American military people on courses in Wiltshire. They fixate on Stonehengs, but I send them to Avebury. Universally, they are blown away.

  • @alanedwards9578
    @alanedwards9578 9 месяцев назад +96

    I think it is crazy that at some time in the distant past, someone thought it was a good idea to put roads and buildings inside a prehistoric monument.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  9 месяцев назад +36

      Sadly, it's been happening for centuries. Most of Avebury, much like other sites, have been dismantled by local people to build houses. By the way, the A4, that runs through Avebury is the old Roman road, so we need to blame them 😉

    • @gumshoe2273
      @gumshoe2273 8 месяцев назад +7

      I know, right?

    • @faragraf9380
      @faragraf9380 4 месяца назад +13

      it wasn’t seen as prehistoric. It was something disturbing. It was bent with pagan culture and devil and superstition.
      People don’t want that old things, they didn’t saw anything advantageous.

    • @alanedwards9578
      @alanedwards9578 4 месяца назад +7

      @@faragraf9380 Very enlightening perspective on what happened. Thank you!

    • @brandyjean7015
      @brandyjean7015 3 месяца назад +5

      ​@@faragraf9380and yet some of us, purposefully follow the old ways. Go figure.

  • @ampgray
    @ampgray Месяц назад +23

    The flooded landscape theory is a new one on me. That's a lot of water for a plateau elevated at hundreds of feet above sea level. I am also unaware of evidence for huts inside the site, especially in the centre of the solar circle where there was a very tall phallic needle stone several metres high. Also, the Swindon stone is not the biggest. It may be the biggest in the main circle, but the biggest on site is one of the Cove stones, which is potentially the largest megalith in Europe. Its the big one across the road from the pub as the road turns towards Swindon. Whereas the Swindon stone is the nearest stone to Swindon tens of metres further north. But despite a few moments I did enjoy this video. Water certainly plays its part as the flooding around Silbury Hill shows.

    • @willempasterkamp862
      @willempasterkamp862 Месяц назад +2

      maybe it was more of a reed-moor capable of holding the water in the winter and slowly drying up during a hot summer. It was embedded in nature with forest all around. The idea that it was on a plain visible from miles away is wrong as the landscape is more hilly.

    • @Bow1man5
      @Bow1man5 Месяц назад +4

      There was no signs of silt in the ditch bottom when excavated, surely there would have been if filled with water.

    • @ampgray
      @ampgray Месяц назад +3

      Yeah, I don't recall mention of any silt either. Which further throws doubt on this interesting but ultimately flawed theory.

    • @merseyviking
      @merseyviking 25 дней назад +2

      Agreed. As far as I recall, the area was more marshy than riverine. While the ditch being used for drainage is an interesting idea and holds some water (pun intended), I would be very surprised if it was in any way navigable.
      My spidey-sense tingled when he said phrases like "the history books will tell you..." and "it was undoubtedly a trading hub". Great drone photography for sure, but best leave off the definitive statements and "the history books are wrong" hyperbole.

    • @SuperGyre
      @SuperGyre 22 дня назад

      At 14.07 "This map shows the superficial deposits, specifically, Alluvium - the material deposited by a river, stream or other body of running water." Evidence? Reference to published data?

  • @user-lx3ce6ne8s
    @user-lx3ce6ne8s Месяц назад +20

    The houses were built from some of the missing stones marked by an oblisk. The stones were heated up and then rapidly cooled and shattered. You can see the fire marks on the stones of the houses built inside the circle.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +5

      Fascinating! I didn't know that, thank you! Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @mikeballen
      @mikeballen Месяц назад +1

      Mario buildreps does any watch this guy very swift

  • @jackgreene5663
    @jackgreene5663 Месяц назад +17

    Should be realised that, being on chalk, when first built the bank was a gigantic shining white ring, and possibly regularly "scoured" to keep it white.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +3

      It's an interesting idea, one I hadn't considered. Thanks for letting me know 🙂

    • @kubhlaikhan2015
      @kubhlaikhan2015 Месяц назад +5

      Curious think about chalk - when you expose it a combination of sun and light rainfall makes it blinding. I worked on a site cut into the south Downs - two people had to go to hospital with temporary blindness and everyone else had to work in sunglasses. I'm not sure our ancestors would have though bare chalk was a good idea.

    • @ChrisShortyAllen
      @ChrisShortyAllen Месяц назад +2

      It's all about entrance to the under world. Neolithic Bollocks.

    • @howardchambers9679
      @howardchambers9679 Месяц назад +4

      ​@@kubhlaikhan2015the HSE wasn't running back then, that blinding ring would be seen from miles away, it's to astound the peasants!
      Imagine never seeing any structure taller than a two storey house and suddenly seeing a cathedral. It's power and control

    • @kubhlaikhan2015
      @kubhlaikhan2015 Месяц назад +3

      @@howardchambers9679 I'm not convinced they went to all that trouble just to hypnotise a few peasants. I'm just saying that if the site was stripped to white chalk it wouldn't have been very usable for anything else. Not only does it blind you in sunlight, it also turns into unimaginably sticky mud after rain. That happened on our site too - after just a few steps the quantity glued to your boots would be so heavy you couldn't lift your feet up to walk. The whole site had to be covered in walkways but most work had to stop entirely util it dried out. Worst environment I've ever had to work in. If they stripped the turf to get to the chalk it was probably linked to something practical like pottery making.

  • @kmehan5917
    @kmehan5917 11 месяцев назад +21

    Chris has truly outdone himself with his latest work, Avebury Henge. This remarkable piece of content showcases his exceptional professionalism, evident in the meticulous topic selection and thoughtful planning. The level of detail and research put into the subject matter is commendable, making it an engaging and informative experience.
    Avebury, a place steeped in history and mystery, is brilliantly brought to life through Chris's video. From the very beginning, it becomes clear that no stone was left unturned in capturing the essence of this ancient site. The visuals are captivating, offering breathtaking shots that showcase the grandeur and significance of Avebury.
    The accompanying music further enhances the overall experience. Carefully selected and masterfully integrated, the soundtrack beautifully complements the visuals, creating an atmosphere that draws the audience deeper into the narrative. The choice of music perfectly aligns with the historical significance of Avebury, establishing an emotional connection with viewers.
    Furthermore, the editing work in this video is nothing short of impressive. The seamless transitions between scenes, the well-paced progression, and the expertly crafted storytelling all contribute to the overall success of the video. Chris's attention to detail is evident throughout, as he skillfully weaves together the various elements to deliver a cohesive and engaging viewing experience.
    Overall, Chris's Avebury Henge stands as a testament to his talents as a content creator. The professionalism exhibited in every aspect, from topic selection to video production, is commendable. The extensive research, combined with the brilliant video, music, and editing, results in an outstanding final product. Chris's efforts are truly praiseworthy, and this video is a must-watch for anyone interested in history, archaeology, or simply seeking an enlightening and visually stunning experience. Well done, Chris!

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +5

      Wow, wow and wow. This has to be my most favourite comment ever! Thank you SO much for taking the time to provide this great feedback. As you can well imagine, it does take a lot of time to capture the footage - but it takes much more to edit it into something that 'tells a story'. Don't get me wrong, I love doing it ... but often it is a thankless task. And comments, such as yours, provides me the encouragement and motivation to continue. Whoever you are, wherever you are ... I thank you 🙇‍♂️

    • @christopherbegley8755
      @christopherbegley8755 Месяц назад +1

      Chris looking good and glowing with intelligence, ya I'm poking funat,and same time plugging the good looking Paul Cook channel, hey these guys could a spectacular documentary on looking good and dressing like GQ, geological question, get it ?u know the fashion magazine gentleman's quarters?? It ain't funny unless you've read Paul Cook channel comments he he

    • @annbrookens945
      @annbrookens945 23 дня назад

      @kmehan5917 : this is a publication-worthy review! I've never seen such a masterful review on ANY RUclips video. I agree with everything you said, but you have said it better than I ever could. Chris, you should absolutely print this off and frame it!

    • @HSolar
      @HSolar 22 дня назад

      2nd this, well said, very well made. How do you feel if I recommended this vid to a respectful partly reaction channel they are a small family, now the parents both watch interesting vid on their UK/Ireland roots & they will be very interested in this. You deserve a wider audience.

  • @JANN-JAPAN
    @JANN-JAPAN Месяц назад +4

    This video and commentary were fantastic! I went to Avebury in the summer of 2022. I loved it. But, I’m so pleased to see the overhead views. It’s a completely different perspective and I wish I had viewed your video before visiting Avebury.

  • @petertrei
    @petertrei 25 дней назад +5

    Very slick, professional video. However, I really think you need to give more explanation of your 'wide river' claim. Is this generally accepted? I had not heard it before, and I've been reading about and visiting the site for 50 years. Wouldn't that put many sites underwater at the time of their construction?

  • @davidcrane7397
    @davidcrane7397 Месяц назад +3

    I've just discovered your channel - thank you RUclips algorithm (for once)!
    Fantastic shots and reconstructions of the historical landscape. Having said all that I'm not convinced about the trading centre theory - Avebury would have been on an island and that makes little sense to me. Also I'm not sure where that leaves other structures like Silbury Hill which looks like it would have been built in the water.
    However, what struck me in your initial LIDAR reconstruction is that there is plenty of high land around and, so far as I could see, none of the structures where positioned on it - so water would appear to be a definite factor in whatever was going on (but, as I said, not specifically for trading).
    Thanks again. Now to look at your other videos!

  • @andymurray9811
    @andymurray9811 Месяц назад +6

    When you look at the circle it almost represents an ox bow lake. Now suppose that the waters weren't so high and inside the ox box lake there was a mound. someone worked out that the mound could accomodate a village and offer protection. You ask why throw the land out of the ditch, perhaps to ensure that the rising waters of a high tide were kept at bay and didn't sink the village. As the land around it sank under water it became a trading post out of necessity. Perhaps because more people came to live on the mound. As for the long barrows, they were for the dead. Depending on what time of year people died, they were buried to the east or the west. I have second idea on this - Perhaps they were always buried to the west but a great illness befell the village and those were left wouldn't desecrate the western barrow, so they built an eastern barrow instead. As for Silbury Hill, suppose it was a watch tower. I enjoyed your video, thanks for the ideas.

    • @nickbrough8335
      @nickbrough8335 Месяц назад

      It is a design feature of late neolithic/early bronze age stone circle design called a Henge. The built rather deep ditches and a ramparts on the outer bank (Stonehenge actually has a non-typical design). It appears to be designed that way to exclude the central place from everyday life. It is also been speculated that the rampart provides viewing access to those who are not important enough to be allowed into the religious space inside. The truth is no one knows what these monuments were designed this way in the UK. The interior space probably became a village later as it sat above the flood plain of the river and was dry all year round. I dont know about Avebury, but when built in a chalk landscape, the ramparts would have been white chalk rubble, unless covered with grass to stabilise the slope. With dedicated maintenance they could have remained this way for quite a long time in practice.
      If youre interested the YT channel "The Prehistory Guys" have an excellent documentary on Standing Stone monuments in the UK (plus some on those in France and Spain although stone circles seems to be very "british"). There is some evidence that the style of long barrow monument was imported into the UK by specific groups of European people (settlers or Trade). You can use the distribution of Stone Axes to demonstrate quite large Trading networks existed across Europe.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +2

      Interesting stuff. Well, regardless of whether it was a trading station or a village, it's very unlikey they put all that effort in just for 'religious purposes'. Especially since it's predecessor, Windmill Hill (half a mile to the northwest) has been proven to be a trading station in the mesolithic. Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @nickbrough8335
      @nickbrough8335 Месяц назад

      @@LamboPhoto I think we're a bit too limited in out thinking. Of course there's a difference between what evidence shows and speculation. A medieval cathedral probably represented a similar level of community input and spending. In addition to religion, they were stars symbols for the local Bishop and Lord (plus their hangers on) and they became a place for local markets and fayres in the square in front.
      so far as I recall there isnt any evidence (high phosphate levels in the soil) that animals were enclosed there. There is quite a bit of evidence for burials, but not at a community wide level.

    • @ChrisShortyAllen
      @ChrisShortyAllen Месяц назад

      Tides at Avebury?

  • @helenamcginty4920
    @helenamcginty4920 Месяц назад +2

    Last year a huge monunent was discovered near Huelva in S Spain. Over 500 megaliths arranged in a concentric arc (maybe there were more?)

  • @jhdee
    @jhdee 11 месяцев назад +1

    Another great video Chris. This is really well put together and totally immersive from start to finish. A fantastic mix of video, drone footage and VR giving us all a modern day view of an amazing site together with a very informative narration are the obvious highlights. However, this production involves much more - research, video editing, sound editing, drone pilot skills etc etc - making it truly a "one-man-band" masterpiece. Looking forward to the next one already.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks mate, that's great feeback 😍 Really happy that you enjoyed the film, and appreciate the effort behind it 👍

    • @DocColVideo
      @DocColVideo 11 месяцев назад +1

      Another awsome production Chris using every means available to put forwardt your historical theories that challenge the more traditional ideas on the Henge's origin and purpose. Love the vlog style presentation and use of software to keep the viewer engrossed in the subject matter; including the drone footage of course. All amazing considering the "life stuff" issues your dealing with. Keep up the good work mate, it's truly inspirational 👌👏

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      @@DocColVideo Thanks Col. Glad you liked it mate. I should have edited this 6 months ago, my bad. Thanks as always for your support 👍

  • @since_56
    @since_56 Месяц назад +2

    Canals have to accurately follow the contours of land so the level of the water remains the same. Navigators will set the canal to specific number of feet above sea level for longer stretches. If they detour from the contour of the land they have to build tunnels, locks or viaducts.

  • @clive.r1414
    @clive.r1414 11 месяцев назад +3

    Brilliant Chris, love the excellent photography and the aerial shots are super. Great use of lidar to explain the theory of an "inland port". i can only imagine the time took to edit it all. Well done and thank you.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Clive! Really good to hear from you!! Hope you and bro are ok. I was saying to someone earlier about these vids, I've made a rod for my own back 😬 But still love adding the 'science' behind it, makes it more real to me. Any ways, sod the vid, keep in touch mate 👏👍

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      P.S. miss you.

  • @sharonholdren7588
    @sharonholdren7588 6 месяцев назад +2

    Been there, done that 30 years ago. I still have goosebumps! Breath taking, awe inspiring, completely amazing.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  5 месяцев назад +1

      Wow, thanks so much. It's an awesome place, and I'm sure the drone video does do the scale of Avebury justice. Thanks for watching and commenting 👍

  • @adamseccombe7907
    @adamseccombe7907 5 месяцев назад +9

    Hi. You should fly your drone from Uffcott past Broad Hinton where the fields are flooded and showing so well. There is even flood to the north west of the henge itself. It’s amazing right now

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  5 месяцев назад +1

      Do you mean fly from Uffcot to Averbury? If so that's 5 miles (8 km), so I wouldn't able to do that. Or do you mean take off from Uffcot and fly to the flooded fields nearby?

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  5 месяцев назад +1

      Good shout, the whole place is flooded. x.com/lambourne_chris/status/1741920015836717080

    • @adamseccombe7907
      @adamseccombe7907 7 дней назад

      @@LamboPhoto apologies for slow response - the point is that the watercourse from uffcot down became visible again 100 yards wide - all the way down the valley...I understand logistical issues - the point was that it could have been great to have captured some of those images in the very wet period earlier this year

  • @WiltshireMan
    @WiltshireMan Месяц назад +3

    Very interesting. I have never considered before the ditch could have been a moat. Great video, Thanks:)

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Thanks, and you are more than welcome, thanks for watching and leaving a comment.

  • @ralphhofmeier8840
    @ralphhofmeier8840 Месяц назад +2

    the stones were already there for a long time and the folks back in time just settled around to worship what was lost…..

  • @experimentalelemental92
    @experimentalelemental92 Месяц назад +1

    Same at Stanton Drew... neighbouring fields have steep ditches surrounding the stones.
    1952/ Chew Valley Lake- Ancient Bronze Age site... Moreton & Stanton Drew both mentioned in Domesday Book.
    Artifacts removed during excavations & never available for public view.
    Church in Pensford on an Island beneath the viaduct.
    The Tump- Iron Age fort.
    Stone Henge- Avebury- Stanton Drew.
    Ace vid. Yes- all waterway canals.

  • @celestenova777
    @celestenova777 11 месяцев назад +1

    Incredible video with great filming. Fantastic to see how it might have looked and I never thought of it being like a moat. I uploaded a couple of videos one on Avebury and one on West Kennet barrow just with music, nothing as good as yours..lol..I climbed Silbury Hill years ago (now you are not allowed to) but couldn't believe how steep it was when you actually climb it but it makes for a great lookout over the surrounding area. Thanks for your work, a great watch, will have to catch up with your other vids!🌳🌾🦣 Edit : just to let you know the Wiltshire Womble recommended your video.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Many thanks for such a lovely comment. It's feedback like this that make's it all worth it 😍 Yeah, Silbury Hill has been secured for a while now, understandable I guess. I've never had the pleasure to go to the top. Ah Mark recommended my vid? That's nice of him! He's got a really good channel, fair dos. All the best mate 👍

  • @Lousialee-hm3gu
    @Lousialee-hm3gu Месяц назад +1

    What a beautiful video, rich in history of the land. I really liked and enjoyed the reconstruction of how the landscape would have looked when the henge was in use. Thankyou.

  • @PeterWasted
    @PeterWasted Месяц назад +2

    I'm not familiar with the notion of the ditch being filled with water. It raises some interesting questions. If it filled from a local river, why does the ditch need to be so deep? If the river was at that level, the ditch would be below the water table making the digging difficult and probably needing some form of water management not well known amongst neolithic people. Slope stability in saturated ground would be different than in dry. The banks at Avebury are pretty steep... Rivers have a tendency to flood. I wonder why the excavated spoil was used to form a bank, blocking external views rather than spread in the inner area to improve flood resistance.

  • @jmegapixel7
    @jmegapixel7 27 дней назад +1

    Probably the best documentary on Avebury I have ever watched !
    I also live in Wiltshire and have traveled that main road many times. Such a mysterious place.
    Thank you for this video just brilliant 👏🏻

  • @thewiltshirewomble
    @thewiltshirewomble 11 месяцев назад +1

    Such a great video my friend… Avebury is my local walking venue where i have also created some footage on. What i also love about your video is your simulation of the water levels which will now make me look at Avebury very differently from now on…. Some great drone footage also over and through the avebury stones. Thank you so much for sharing. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.. Mark 👍

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Cheers Mark, really appreciate that. Yes, Avebury is fab. Love it, probably more than Stonehenge to be honest. So much going on. I only got into Geology a few years back, but since then, it has really helped in understanding the real purpose of a lot of these places. It is far too easy to label them all as "ceremonial" or "religious", seems a bit of a cop out - especially when it comes to digging a 1 mile, 9 metre deep, 15 metres wide ditch ... along with about 5,000 tons of sarsen stones! 😅 Just checked out your channel, we have a lot in common! I was down at Potterne, Roundway and Broad Hinton filming the crop circles a couple of weeks back. You've captured them well. We are luckly to have Wiltshire on our doorstep 🤩👍

    • @thewiltshirewomble
      @thewiltshirewomble 11 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you my friend… The geology element really adds to your videos…love it 👍Please keep in touch Chris… would be great to buddy up with you one day… maybe at one of the next crop circles 😊
      Just posted a link on my community to your Avebury video… Speak soon Mark 👍

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      @@thewiltshirewomble Sounds good. My contact is on the about page. I'm always heading south of the M4 down to Avebury, Pewsey Downs, Devizes, etc. It's a beautiful part of the world. Thanks for sharing the vid, mate. Ta for now 👍

  • @DWKThedogbreaths
    @DWKThedogbreaths Месяц назад +1

    The most informative and watchable film about Avebury I've ever seen.

  • @MarlaBlair-ys2zu
    @MarlaBlair-ys2zu Месяц назад +1

    Great combination of geology and ancient building practices. Could do without some of the loud, dramatic music. The graphics and narrative speak for themselves. Thank you.

  • @give_peas_a_chance
    @give_peas_a_chance 11 месяцев назад +4

    This is excellent, and your theory of an inland port makes so much sense ! I love your videos.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +2

      Thank you! It's not actually my theory, it's Robert John Langdon's theory, author of Prehistoric Britain. Full credit goes to him 👍

  • @RaymondoLeeTravel
    @RaymondoLeeTravel 11 месяцев назад +1

    Always love coming here! My wife’s family are from the area. Cheers 👋

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you, Raymondo 👏 Glad you enjoyed it, you and your family are always welcome 👍

  • @TimothyLuke-sh6gl
    @TimothyLuke-sh6gl Месяц назад

    I have just found your channel! Excellent professional videos. Please keep them coming!

  • @jdrone
    @jdrone 11 месяцев назад +2

    Nice to meet you. Bro. I think it's a special place that deserves to be deserved. Thank you for the video today.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks! I totally agree, it is a very special place indeed! 👍

  • @stephaniegarrett3246
    @stephaniegarrett3246 28 дней назад

    I enjoyed this and got more feel for it's original purpose than from any other description as yet. Thank you 🙏

  • @derekgreenacre9530
    @derekgreenacre9530 16 дней назад +1

    As with all these prehistoric circles I feel that too much emphasis is placed on the ditch rather than the bank. It is the bank which was the important thing to the builders, the ditch being merely the supplier of the material to build the bank. The evidence for this must of course the Mayburgh henge in Cumbria where there is no ditch but a huge bank made of small stones collected from the river.

  • @GHOST5663
    @GHOST5663 Месяц назад

    Excellent video Chris. I like the way you went through everything and your use of graphics really helped. Using the river to flood the area would provide security, ease of travel and food. I would never have considered the area as being a waterscape. As for Silbury hill, I guess they had to dump all the spoil from the ditches somewhere.

  • @elizabethtowers3321
    @elizabethtowers3321 Месяц назад

    Really well done. Thank you. I had no idea about the water surrounding this area to this extent. I subscribed : )

  • @JauneMacReady
    @JauneMacReady 11 месяцев назад +1

    Great video. Well made, very informative and interesting. I went to Avebury once, years ago and have to admit, I think it's more impressive than Stonehenge. I love how there's a village in the middle of it. I think it's time for me to head down there again.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Glad you enjoyed it! Yes, definitely worth revisiting if you have the chance! I love the place, and there are so many more related sites within a stone's throw of Avebury too 👍

    • @JauneMacReady
      @JauneMacReady 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@LamboPhoto absolutely! So much history in that area.

  • @SallyJGlendinning
    @SallyJGlendinning Месяц назад +3

    Could the ditch have been used as a water source ??

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Potentionally to provide to the local villagers, who knows? Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @meerfisch
    @meerfisch Месяц назад +4

    Absolutely breathtaking photography. ❤

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Why thank you, very kind of you to say! Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @mikeballen
      @mikeballen Месяц назад

      Mario buildreps does any watch this guy very swift

  • @sonsoffalstaff2600
    @sonsoffalstaff2600 3 месяца назад +1

    Beautifully done. Food for thought. Thank you.

  • @vardito10
    @vardito10 18 дней назад

    wow, fantastic video. I love that area and have explored a few times, how the hell did they do that under water, particularly silbury hill...and yet your interpretation makes a lot more sense to me having seen it all.

  • @SHPR2013
    @SHPR2013 Месяц назад +3

    Great video and content.
    So according to your timeline during the construction of the bank and ditch phase of Avebury, the water table was so high that it swelled rivers to the height of the inner flat centre ground of the Henge?, only Avebury at present is 161m or 528 feet above sea level and Dogger Bank which disappeared around 5000BCE is at it's shallowest today 14m or 43 feet below sea level - what would stop the water flowing with gravity to the lower land first which would surely mean that Dogger Bank would have been flooded a lot sooner than the evidence dredged from the North Sea shows?, apologies for asking but it doesn't quite add up to me.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +2

      Thanks, glad you enjoyed the video. As I have mentioned previously, I am no geologist, hydrologist or historian. I simply like history and photography. My video covers Robert John Langdon's hypothesis , not mine. I found it interesting and thought it would make good entertainment and offer a different view point than the main stream history books. Robert shares indepth evidence to support his hypothesis, not just on post glacial flooding (link below), but also Avebury, Stonehenge and many other interesting areas. I've covered a few of these topics myself in videos on my channel; Wansdyke, Devil's Den and now Avebury. As you would have seen in my video(s), I have used phrases such as 'may have looked like this', as no-one knows entirely what happened. But if nothing else, this video has stimulated a lot of discussion, which is always good. Thanks for taking the time to comment, and thanks also for watching - hope to see you back here soon 🙂
      post-glacial-hypothesis.uk/tpgh_britain_rivers

  • @moiraallen3841
    @moiraallen3841 Месяц назад

    You have a lovely open mind. Great film, fascinating story. Thanks.

  • @biffa1234100
    @biffa1234100 Месяц назад

    fantastic piece of work, many thanks. Have also liked and subscribed.

  • @AndyBsUTube
    @AndyBsUTube Месяц назад +1

    Very interesting idea. Nice work.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Thank you! Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @DavidLorenzoFlorida
    @DavidLorenzoFlorida 11 месяцев назад +1

    *Interesting hypothesis and history lesson on Avebury Henge and the surrounding monuments. 👍*

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  10 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks David. And sorry for the late response! Avebury is about half hour south of me in the car. It's one of my all time faves. As around it are so many neolithic sites. It's a droners paradise 👏👍

  • @janetcox4873
    @janetcox4873 9 месяцев назад +1

    Love your work!, ... smiled when I saw you put on your coat r car when you started the trip, lol. Seriously, great work, thank you!

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  9 месяцев назад +1

      Wow, thank you so much for your lovely comment. I am so glad you enjoyed it. I do love making these videos, and reading comments such as yours is all the motivation I need 😀 Thank you for watching, take care, Chris 👍

    • @janetcox4873
      @janetcox4873 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@LamboPhoto edit error re: 'coat r car' ... sorry 'bout that. The 'cult of water' that Pope Gregory wrote of [to some Abbott with a name I can't remember at the moment, lol] made the natural world and the old canal systems so real and important to me. Huge thanks for showcasing such cool info with beautiful vids.

  • @kevster2171
    @kevster2171 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for that amazing 3d reconstruction of the site. Such a revelation to see the water restored. The problem for me is that the Beckhampton Ave and part of the WK Ave would have been underwater according to this. I think ceremonial still makes more sense as why build such huge ditches and banks for a port?

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +1

      The henge was made when the land was flooded, many years before the avenues were built - which were built later because of the lack of water.

  • @peterhudson4027
    @peterhudson4027 Месяц назад +2

    An implication of the bank/ditch being the wrong way round is that it was not designed to keep people out - but to keep someone/something IN. Either real people, or in a spiritual or religious sense?

    • @AndyJarman
      @AndyJarman Месяц назад

      On my visit the bank seemed to look like a spectator viewing platform, with the inner platform separated by the ditch. It might have been a mustering/performance area for great gatherings.
      The woefully modest building efforts the Anglo Saxons left behind puts into perspective the immense call on resources these things had.
      I can't bring myself to believe their religion was that firmly entrenched it could demand such actions. But then we should remember this was around the time the Egyptians were building the pyramids.
      We have such a peculiar image of what our society was like then it makes all of this baffling.
      Even if the ground water was not quite as high as you depict, the ditch would still have been wet, and its sheer depth would have formed a formidable barrier.

  • @truter5243
    @truter5243 Месяц назад +1

    If you use the stones as anchors to place logs/branches/rope, etc in there, you end up with a pretty secure way to manage livestock

    • @Sunnycider1
      @Sunnycider1 24 дня назад +1

      Exactly, it's a good theory! Historians often theorise of rituals and ceremonies, but of course ways of feeding themselves, of surviving, is a vital and obvious necessity that our ancestors would have surely worked so hard on. Keeping animals in strong enclosures so they could eat and trade them would definitely have made sense

    • @truter5243
      @truter5243 24 дня назад

      @Sunnycider1 I agree with you. They often want to romanticize the past, but I'm sure more often than not, these remains were of a practical nature. Why chase after your livestock over vast fields when you can keep them contained to an area. Especially if the area was indeed a place of trade. I expect animals could get startled or annoyed with all the movement or arrival of other traders or other species of animal from those traders. The animals would naturally want to spread out. That's just annoying on the legs 😆 Keep them all contained and your day becomes less cumbersome

  • @mm-qd1ho
    @mm-qd1ho Месяц назад +1

    Why does the presence of water negate the ceremonial use? What is the margin of error, in feet, of the height of the water in the simulations?

  • @pcka12
    @pcka12 Месяц назад +1

    It would be interesting to see a video showing how you filmed this video.
    I have been to Avebury many times (at first with my dad), but there is always something to learn.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      I filmed it using the Insta360 X3 and the Mini 3 Pro. I used freely available LiDAR data to render the animations. Avebury is a magical place, you and I are very lucky to have been there in person. Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @pcka12
      @pcka12 Месяц назад

      @@LamboPhoto I did not realise that lidar data was now freely available, now WW2 German photo mosaic, that I knew about!

  • @susannah1066
    @susannah1066 Месяц назад

    WOW-loved the recreation.

  • @velvetindigonight
    @velvetindigonight Месяц назад +1

    Thought provoking especially the watery map of the landscape 2,000 odd years bc just before your conclusion........ reminded me other watery places and that boats were the easiest form of transport back then... Think of the travel between Ireland and Scotland and Scotland and Norway etc.,

  • @altair8598
    @altair8598 Месяц назад +2

    I thought it rang bells with Robert Langdon's book 'Prehistoric Britain - the Stonehenge Enigma'! Could there have been a fiery beacon on top of Silbury Hill to guide boats to the moat/trading harbour?

    • @warpedweft9004
      @warpedweft9004 Месяц назад

      quite possibly, or an early warning system.

  • @mrmanch204
    @mrmanch204 Месяц назад

    This is excellent, top presentation, thank you for your hard work. Great use of evidence to reach possible conclusions with an open mind.

  • @davidcunningham2074
    @davidcunningham2074 Месяц назад

    love the narrow camera angles.

  • @jaycrandell147
    @jaycrandell147 Месяц назад

    Bloody 'ell. Now THAT is impressive. Did you just rock my world? Hasn't archaeology, and science, come forward a bit these days. And your visuals are superlative, as usual. I doff my hat to you, sir. Thank you for the eye, and mind, opener.

  • @wrightwells
    @wrightwells 4 месяца назад +2

    Thats really interesting and when you see Silbury Hill in flood its shows how possible this would have been.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Coincidentally, shortly after I filmed this, Silbury was surrounded by water. I filmed it and it's on my Instagram page, link in my channel details.

  • @russelsellick316
    @russelsellick316 Месяц назад

    Fascinating place. Visited it twice in the 1970s

  • @0harris0
    @0harris0 Месяц назад

    I've seen it in this way for quite some time!
    well done 🙏

    • @0harris0
      @0harris0 Месяц назад

      I'm not fully with you on the dating but the evidence is bountiful

  • @Summerrose400
    @Summerrose400 Месяц назад

    Absolutely fascinating thank you for sharing your thoughts.

  • @philiph6488
    @philiph6488 2 месяца назад +1

    I've watched and read plenty on Avebury over the years, but this is excellent.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Many thanks for a lovely comment and I am glad you enjoyed it.

  • @Bombaybadboy007
    @Bombaybadboy007 11 месяцев назад +1

    Superb mr Chris 🎉

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  11 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks @Bombaybadboy007 ... glad you liked it mate 👍

  • @vicsaunders9710
    @vicsaunders9710 12 дней назад

    Good video, enjoyed that. 👍👏👏

  • @willempasterkamp862
    @willempasterkamp862 Месяц назад

    the cars coming in at the wrong side of the road shook me up
    time for a coffee

  • @Jon6429
    @Jon6429 21 день назад

    Definitely puts an interesting twist on things but still trying to get head around the concept of moat inside the wall.

  • @einarcgulbrandsen7177
    @einarcgulbrandsen7177 19 дней назад +1

    It think it looks like a draining and a retainer wall. Keep the outside out and the inside separated. Any chance there is fresh water inside ?

  • @asotpan
    @asotpan Месяц назад +2

    Great video just a pity the raucous music spoils it.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Music is subjective, some like, some dislike. Always hard to find the balance. Glad to hear you liked the video though 🙂

  • @KokowaSarunoKuniDesu
    @KokowaSarunoKuniDesu 7 месяцев назад +1

    So what was the hydrology at the Valley of Stones, and between there and Avebury? Could the stones have been rafted to the site?

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  7 месяцев назад +1

      As far as I understand, and I am not hydrologist, geologist, let alone historian (I just like to tell a story from land and air) ... due to the meltwater causing wider/deeper rivers than today, filling what we now call dry valleys - it may have been possible to raft the stones east out of Valley of Stones (passing Devil's Den), the turn south and immediately west up what was then a huge River Kennet, turning north at Silbury Hill and north up to Avebury. See 13:13 for map. Again, just a theory, but I do find it very interesting.

  • @bardmadsen6956
    @bardmadsen6956 3 месяца назад +2

    That was freaky with what I know, if your proposal is correct, the real message in symbolism would be the comet serpent passing through the Sun/Planet, where-in the cosmic snake would come from the Sea (sky & space) crossing the circle, also surrounded by water, and back into infinity. Check out Cintos LiDAR and colorize, that is kind of what I was expecting and to see the serpent that was there. I'm keenly interested if one would be able to see a bon fire at the top of Silbury Hill from Stonehenge? Also, how far off are the two from Celestial North? Had a dream long ago about being on a tiny planet alike the fish eyed lens scene. Subscribed just for the imagery I got, thanks!

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      I will check it out. Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @glendamears3618
    @glendamears3618 11 дней назад

    This is amazing. Thankyou l loved it😊

  • @tvtirl
    @tvtirl Месяц назад

    So, could there have been access to the circle by boat? Would post glacial flooding have still existed (full-time or seasonally)? If it was a trading centre, how far afield did the trading extend? Would there be navigable access to the sea?

  • @js2749
    @js2749 6 дней назад

    The wet, marshy period went from (approx) 4,000BC to 3,500BC. The henge was dug BEFORE this period, and the stones were brought in AFTER this wet period. You are correct to say there was a wet period during the time of Avebury, but the story is a little bit more complex that your description here. ALSO the henge was never filled with water. Great video, however.

  • @leelastarsky
    @leelastarsky Месяц назад +1

    This was fabulous!! Thankyou!!

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +1

      Kind of you to say! Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @joangordoneieio
    @joangordoneieio Месяц назад +1

    Brilliant work!

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Thank you! Cheers! Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @corruptduboiscountyindiana5058
    @corruptduboiscountyindiana5058 Месяц назад +3

    they thought we will bury this guy under this giant rock so we never have to worry about anyone digging him up and then..........

    • @nickbrough8335
      @nickbrough8335 Месяц назад

      A Special burial. One question might be was it because he was a local VIP or because he was a suspected to have seen wandering around after death.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      Well, he was wrong! 😅 Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @warpedweft9004
    @warpedweft9004 Месяц назад +1

    i would have liked a closer look at the lidar images. I've been working with the National Trust looking for archaeological features on lidar images, and am wondering if there are some additional features in the lidar images that could shed further light on things. There is a very high possibility that it's already been done by archaeologists, but I'd still have liked to have seen them. While I could pause the video to look at them, you can't see much without zooming in for a closer look unfortunately.

    • @merseyviking
      @merseyviking 25 дней назад

      He used data from the National LiDAR Programme, which is free to download as raw point clouds, or DTMs, and has a horizontal resolution of 1 - 2m for all of England. QGIS has a primitive but usable 3D DTM and point cloud viewer.

    • @warpedweft9004
      @warpedweft9004 25 дней назад +1

      @@merseyviking yes i discovered that last night when I was looking at something else.

  • @dottester3039
    @dottester3039 Месяц назад +1

    Amazing work, thank you.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      More than welcome! Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @cindysunley5992
    @cindysunley5992 Месяц назад

    Absolutely agree with this analysis and love the presentation. Thank you!

  • @stephengarrett8076
    @stephengarrett8076 Месяц назад

    Wow i never knew, thanks this brings a lot into perspective 👍

  • @sharonholdren7588
    @sharonholdren7588 6 месяцев назад +1

    As green as that grass is and you're bundled like it was January.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching. 12 days till January 🙂

  • @angelafoxmusic7265
    @angelafoxmusic7265 Месяц назад

    Fascinating. Thankyou.

  • @daizyflower272
    @daizyflower272 28 дней назад

    Anyone made a connection with this Avebury and the Martain Cydonia map?

  • @EGDD-42
    @EGDD-42 11 дней назад

    Avebury is an old harbour with 270 mooting off the stones as posts to tie off, Silbury is a lighthouse
    Looks just a feasible as its a giant place of worship

  • @damianjones6546
    @damianjones6546 Месяц назад +1

    Fascinating, thanks 👍

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +1

      Thanks for watching and glad you enjoyed it.

  • @philipmcdonagh1094
    @philipmcdonagh1094 Месяц назад

    11:11 now that's trippy.

  • @stevemcha7129
    @stevemcha7129 Месяц назад

    Rainfall at that time (3k to 3.5k years ago) must have been phenomenal if the width and depth of the river Kennet proposed is to be believed, especially at that elevation.

    • @stevemcha7129
      @stevemcha7129 Месяц назад

      Edit : correction 4K to 4.5k years ago.

  • @PESKII
    @PESKII 27 дней назад

    Great diea to crunch over, and my only addition would be to question why there? And would building it on that small island be manageable? I would be suprised if that island had all the natural resources to build it, meaning a connection to the mainland in some way. Surely buidling this type pf construction would be better suited to the peninsular to the left of it, giving access to both the island if ceremonialy important, and much better access to natural resources or even inland trade routes. I am probably missing something here and this may be a silly question though.

  • @brandyjean7015
    @brandyjean7015 3 месяца назад +1

    For us older Americans: 9 meters is 29 feet... so yes that ditch was plenty deep.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +1

      My thoughts exactly, a lot of earth to dig for ceromonial purposes.

  • @nickbrough8335
    @nickbrough8335 Месяц назад +2

    Interesting, but I have a question or two. Was that River an estuary or flooded valley in the late neolithic/early Bronze age ? If it wasn't. the geological map will only be showing the extent of the flood plain of the river. This may well have resulted in the ditch around the Avebury site becoming flooded as the River flooded (not necessarily on a 100 % basis as the volume of flood water would vary). you would also need to measure the depth of the flood plain deposits in the river valley and in the opening to the ditch to check the actual flood plain depth some 4,000 years ago. It should be easy enough to prove with an auger (permission/approvals etc).

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +1

      The area today is full of dry valleys, once flooded. I am no geologist or hydrologist, not even a historian! I am just someone who loves history 😅 Thanks for watching 🙂

    • @nickbrough8335
      @nickbrough8335 Месяц назад +1

      @@LamboPhoto Geologist by degree (a long time ago now though). I haven't been to Avebury. Dry valley's suggest Chalk (the spring line today tends to happen at the boundary with the lower Cretaceous Wealden beds, which are clay rich). These valleys were formed when the area was permafrost during the last ice age (pre-8,000+ ish). The chalk being frozen eroded rather than absorbed the water from the rivers (plus melt water from glaciers to the north).
      I don't think your hypothesis is particularly affected whether it's spring/winter flooding only. It's the observation that the ditch opens onto the river valley flood plain, which is important. Henge monuments do typically seem to have a "bridge" (or several) across the ditch, but I think it's much more common to find the ditches are fully enclosed (from what I've seen)..
      The Prehistory Guys (a YT channel now) made a 2 hour documentary called Standing with Stones which is a fascinating general introduction to Neolithic and Bronze age monuments of the UK. I find the sites where they used Tree trunks (which we might call Totem Poles these days) instead of stone particularly fascinating and the potential purpose of the outer ramparts. They're more science based than a lot of the YT Megalith channels, which are often full of very interesting speculation, but quite low on evidence. I try to be open minded.

    • @elbapo7
      @elbapo7 Месяц назад +2

      Liked the video. Think the hypothesis is questionable.
      Why build huge avenues of huge stones which would be half underwater?
      Why have such huge stones surrounding a port?
      What is the evidence the ditch was flooded.
      It would be great if water were involved and I can imagine this but it has no explanatory power for the nature of the site and also thrown up more questions

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      @@nickbrough8335 Interesting stuff, I will check out the Prehistory Guys, it sounds right up my street. Thanks.

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      @@elbapo7 As mentioned in the vid, the stone avenues no doubt came later. As the water continued to recede, Avebury was no longer accessible by boat. They could only get as close as The Sanctuary and Silbury Hill, hence they built West Kennet Avenue from the river up to Avebury.
      The stones could have been defensive or used as leverage to load/unload the boats ... who knows?
      There is plenty of evidence to show the ditch was flooded, as it contains alluvial deposits such as silt only found in waterways.
      Thanks for commenting 🙂

  • @MattsBrabus
    @MattsBrabus Месяц назад +1

    Guess the question i have is as Silbury has been dated to circa 2400BCE how would it have been built given the predicted water levels at that time?

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад +2

      Silbury Hill was built in 3 stages, over hundreds of years. Who knows the original elevation of the ground that it was built on? Perhaps it was already a natural hill, surrounded by water - making it an ideal place for building it upon. Or perhaps the moat that we see around the hill today in flooding season is merely due to the material that was cut from the landscape to make the hill over the years. Pass. Good question though! Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @egoldstraw6952
    @egoldstraw6952 3 месяца назад +1

    I was expecting it to be snowing until you went outside

    • @LamboPhoto
      @LamboPhoto  Месяц назад

      It was snowing heavily in winter, I included a scene at the end of the video. Thanks for watching 🙂

  • @jasoneyre3424
    @jasoneyre3424 Месяц назад

    Under water! That’s the first time I’ve heard anyone mention that in 40yrs! The only other person to mention it was my father.

  • @Reziac
    @Reziac Месяц назад

    Avebury, different eye: The circular ditch is a moat. The standing stones are merlons, inner and outer defenses (why else would it follow the rim of the moat). Probably had wattle walls between.

  • @andrewburbidge
    @andrewburbidge Месяц назад

    The outer barrier suggests that people were shut in, as with modern religious and similar ceremonies. Was there an understanding of ownership, like with sheep and cattle, with ceremonial dipping and washing, still widely practised today?
    Was there a marriage type of cermony, helping to retain a following over many generations? Avebury; Ave; Avenue; also suggested by, Ave Maria, in more recent traditions. Did the flooded area represent feminine anatomy for some time during the site's development? Did the name known today stem from that place and era?
    Similarly in Yorkshire, the name, Thornborough -- The Orion Borough?
    Does the Whitsun Weddings tradition stem from Avebury in its era, related to the May blossom? The Orion Henges, near Ripon, had a white covering, likely to have represented the snow-covered mountains, where those in Scandinavia showed signs of having risen somehow because of landing stages being far above the waterline. An idea could have arisen about being able to influence the rising of land to gain protection against the flooding at the edge of the North Sea.
    In time, the flooding declined, Silbury Hill could have been used to test the idea that the setting of the Three Line Stars, represented at Thornborough, could influence the height of the land, even though refraction in the atmosphere, causing the apparent rise of the middle of the three stars relative to the other two, probably had no alternative type of explanation.
    A new tradition quite likely developed, repurposing the association with whiteness that was used at Thornborough and with the Orion pyramids in Egypt, to symbolise purity at the time of marriage.
    Why was this video, posted to RUclips 10 months ago, in the list of recommendations for me this day, May 14th, with Whitsun being 4 days away on Sunday May 19th this year? I hadn't thought of this connection to Avebury before!

  • @mccblarney
    @mccblarney 23 дня назад

    Interesting idea.

  • @warpedweft9004
    @warpedweft9004 Месяц назад

    The stone you mentioned where a skeleton was buried with it. Do you know if the stone was on top of any of the skeleton? If it was, then it could be a particular type of burial where the stone is supposed to prevent the person from ever returning. They are called revenants.

  • @megs4193
    @megs4193 Месяц назад

    That feels so righ! 😊❤❤❤.

  • @simontemplarGB
    @simontemplarGB Месяц назад

    Where did "trade" suddenly come from?

  • @More-Space-In-Ear
    @More-Space-In-Ear Месяц назад

    I've always thought it to be a safe harbour.