PLEASE “THE HILL” producers…Jessica needs someone to coach her on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, she appears ignorant on these subjects and it makes her look foolish. Not a good look.
I dont know who runs the Fearless Fund, but hats off to them for not appealing this ruling. They only had 1 more grant to give under that specific program. Smart of them.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Jessica's poker example forgets ur not asking the guy that cheated u ur asking their grandkids and other people that were never playing in the first place
You're asking the government that even 60 years ago sanctioned discrimination specifically against blacks at the benefit of whites to rectify damages done. It wasn't a bunch of rogue individuals, it was the US government.
ill gotten gains is ill gotten gains. We can come up with ways that’s more fair, for example I met a man who told me his father who fought in WW2, didn’t receive a GI bill after returning. I think that would be a more fair metric to fulfill that promise to black WW2 veterans, but we simply aren’t going to close significantly the racial wealth gap through individual efforts.
@@Mcedees24 I agree the government made promises that they never kept, but asking a group that failed u over and over to do the right think isn't going to work it's like asking ur partner to not to cheat knowing they go out and cheat on u every Saturday then expecting them to change. Sorry I have no faith in government
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
You left out the part where Jessica's ancesters use stolen ill gotten gains to buy property, insurance & better education for themself & all thiae connected to them to insure that their grandchildren didnt start from the bottom but enjoyed priviledges of a head start (not every family) plus the systemic historical & institutional discrimination that benefitted the grandparents & their offspring by design for generations. FACTS.
Jessica's world view is races pitted against each other in a zero-sum game. I am concerned for her. There is no way to have peace or unity. Her card game analogy just called all non-black Americans cheaters and thieves because of slavery perpetrated prior to 1866 in America. The cheater and cheated are not sitting at that table in 2024, and Jessica just accused approximately 87% of the US population of the sin of enslaving people. Her behavior is reprehensible here.
Yes Jessica believes in socialistic leveling of our society. This has never worked and has created great harm in many ways including killing the incentives that are part of meritocracies! She needs to read some history about her awful agenda…..
When I watch segments here and read the comments, I see how much the conservatives hate Jessica and say they slightly miss the other host who was fired. But they didn't like the other left-leaning host either. Some type of comments So I think they want to hear their thoughts echoed back to themselves, and they won't like any leftist host.
Jessica is completely uninformed. I literally unsubscribed yesterday because of her and came back this morning bc i thought maybe i was being silly. Nope. I used to love listening to Thr Hill but i can't listen her on any subject.
Investing in companies based on immutable characteristics is just plain foolish. You invest in companies that are viable. They have a product/service that you use and believe in.
jago.. nothing foolish about it. So long as there's an evaluation of the viabiity of each woman and their business before the grant is given, then it's reasonable, rational and likely to pay off.
This presumption that the assets of slaveholders only increased and were directly inherited by immediate family amazes me. How do we know that if slaves had been given reparations, a good number wouldn't have lost it in bad investments, leaving their descendants with nothing anyway. Why is the presumption that they would have necessarily accumulated generational wealth?
The rationale for it is basedon on the fact of other Americans accumulating gemerational wealth. But to the point, reparations have nothing to do with whether recipients and their progeny KEEP their new-found wealth. Reparations are a debt owed to folks who had lost the opportunity to make a life for themselves and their progeny.
@@jayron02001 , I understand that. But why would we assume the descendants are due anything at all? That isn't how inheritance works. Maybe their ancestor specifically did not want their son or daughter to have anything. Then the grandchild would have nothing. We get into the territory of guessing what someone's last wishes were 5 generations ago, then 4 generations ago, then 3 generations ago. Next, did the company bankrupt in 1934? Are there any assets? It's not going to be simple, like I have black skin, therefore you owe me money. There were some blacks who also owned slaves. Do they pay or get paid?
@@jpvoodoo5522 Exactly, it has too much theoretical nonsense that needs to sorted through first. For example, I'm part Native American and Irish. Historical injustices were exacted on both groups, so do I get a paycheck for that? Is it even possible for the distribution of reparations to be fair in and of itself? This is why we have statutes of limitations -- you can't just sit on a claim forever, it'll expire at some point. All of the people had a good claim to reparations are dead buy now.
the crazy part is many reparations for slavery WERE given. like it already happened. many times. and often the reparations that former slaves were given was land that was originally occupied by indigenous americans so not only did they get reparations but they colonized while doing it. real history means nothing to anyone seems like.
Jessica's analogy to playing cards is insanely silly. Society is far too complex for such a silly analogy. Also, she just ignores Amber when Amber fact checks her. It must be nice to be a progressive, you get to ignore reality.
What about all of the families that didn't have slaves ? What about all of the people who came here after slavery ? Should those people be held accountable for something that they were not involved in ?
IF we want to equalize prejudice and make race more of an issue As a native American I think land should be given back. Call it an allotment to repair the wealth distribution too.
It makes no difference other than from a moral view where these families made their core wealth. Slavery was legal in America as well as around the world. When slavery was made unlawful that's when the funds earned were wrongly acquired. The law then granted 40 acres and a mule to blacks freed from slavery. Said and done. You cannot expect the people today to pay for the abuses of people from over a hundred and whatever years ago. My mother was a Holocaust survivor. Years later she as a victim was given reparations from Germany for the loss. I get no money because I'm not a Holacaust Survivors child. Those seeking rep
For a second there, I thought Jessica was suggesting that the “rich guys” running the grant program give gifts to the Supreme Court justices, á la Clarence Thomas’ acceptance of gifts from Harlan Crow.
It had nothing to do with what was written on the cake. It was because it was a wedding cake. They can have any other cake as long as it isn't a wedding cake.
Amazing. At the end of the segment, Jessica actually argues that businesses should have the right to deny service based on race. It's really hard to think of a more racist claim.
9:46 "The Supreme in the past ruled that you can deny someone business based off of identity. You don't have to sell someone a wedding cake if they're..." Response: "That's not accurate. That's not what the Supreme Court ruled." 👏 Her: (continues to misrepresent) 🥴 We are so used to someone intentionally misrepresenting this case (in media) that it is wonderful to see it rebuffed in real-time.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
When will the hill look at the comments section and do the will of their viewers and find a replacement for jessica? Almost every videos comments are saying it.
JFK sr, sadly his son is also deceased, was fighting for civil rights and especially VOTING rights. Im not sure I understand your comment. I am sure you don't believe that American citizens should not be allowed to vote based on the color of their skin, are you?
Yes, Jessica, it is perfectly okay for "The Fearless Fund" _to give_ the Black ladies a _gift._ The problem is that the Fund, instead, offers the ladies _a contract_ which it cannot do unless it offers it to all women, regardless of the color of their skin. Amber, here, is not much closer to the constitutional mark. She has not read the 62 page decision, otherwise she would not characterize the facts as she does.
im sorry but the guy who brought this lawsuit against them is full of it. I mean it does feel like they are coming after minority spaces. some stuff should and is just for people of a certain community and that should not be threatening to everyone else
@@devanshepard9118💯% correct. Not surprised tho that people wanna get mad about this when it’s black people doing it, even tho every other ethnicity has done something similar
They didn’t ask the question in the right way they should ask her to her face on air. Is it black women Ing themselves divisive , and give her all the oxygen she needs to answer that question because we want to hear this one
I remember Jess saying to Robby in another conversation that Trump's idea to create a new cabinet led by Elon to reduce bureaucracy is in fact adding to bureaucracy. Ok, fair enough. However, then why does she think the discrimination is ok to fight the cause against..uh...er...ummm.. discrimination?! Doesn't anyone ascribe to the old adage, "Two wrongs don't make a right"?
i dont see how the fearless fund was being discriminating. It was much needed to help black woman . some stuff is just for people in a certain community
Oh, Amber. I'm so sorry... again. I don't know how do you do it, but I commend you. Having to deal with Nomi and Jessica should entitle you to bottomless wine glasses all across DC.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
And once again when immigrants come in and use that argument, you have to stop them in their tracks and remind them why are they here and when they’re here they decide to pay the debts of the land. This is not an argument for them. This is internal and if they were smart, they will stay out of this.
The Hill should stop only covering DEI when it comes to race. It also includes people with disabilities, women, LGBTQ, etc.... Cover all of the groups not just race.
@@dougsfriendskeeter That is both. The Americans with disabilities act is a joke. Besides helping people with physical disabilities gain access to buildings, it has done nothing of what it was intended to do especially with career inclusion.
@@tonyg76 I guess this is a subject near and dear to you, but making it part and parcel of the ESG/DEI agenda is a bit much...that goes for the women and LGBTQ aspects as well. How about let's not enshrine discrimination into institutional governmental policies.
@@BWolf00 1) Enshrine discrimination? That is what DEI in theory is supposed to be preventing. 2) How are disabilities too much for DEI when that it was it is intended to address?
Jessica - The three wealthiest demographics in America are Chinese-Americans, Indian-Americans, and Jewish-Americans all grouping that did not benefit from slavery or contributed to the prolonging of slavery.
Jewish individuals/families received reparations-compensation for the suffering of their ancestors. Other immigrants did not die for "Civil rights" in USA but they benefit from those opportunities to have access to the best education in America, money for businesses & credit, access to housing. You prove a point here other groups were not brought here in chains to build this country for Free but get to Enjoy & take advantage of the Fruit of other's Labor with an easier path & navigation somehow 😮
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Kudos to Amber for correcting her on the cake court case
Jessica really demonstrating why the gaslighting girlboss is such a problem.
PLEASE “THE HILL” producers…Jessica needs someone to coach her on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, she appears ignorant on these subjects and it makes her look foolish. Not a good look.
Why is Jessica always an insufferable Kent?
Be gone, little hater.
@@jayron02001someday Jessica will notice you simping for her, and give you a little smile.
It’s her job as a Dem
Certainly if they hand out individual money to businesses. Can no longer claim it as a non-profit organization. Taxes become an issue.
@@christopherdame9073 A handout is, by definition, a gift.
And gifts are not taxable.
In fact, the giver of the gift is eligible for a tax credit.
Jessica. Wasted her money on college.
Her loans were forgiven.
Jessica lives in another dimension
You sure is not the party who are supporting someone who’s screaming about eating your pets 😂😂😂😂😂
@@leslietorres7143 she doesn't appear to listen to her co hosts. It's just in one ear and out the other.
@@leslietorres7143It's amusing that you think someone has to be either a Democrat or Republican, considering 43% of voters identify as Independents.
Jessica's simplistic view of history and how wealth has been acquired, is childish.
She has one decent take and then follows up with 99 horrible ones.
Extremely sheltered grown child
There is not much about Jessica that is not childish.
Jessica”and give them drugs and guns like “. What an argument conflation.
Can we make amber a mainstay of the show. Robby is too soft to put up s fight, most of the time he folds the lunatics on the left.
I dont know who runs the Fearless Fund, but hats off to them for not appealing this ruling. They only had 1 more grant to give under that specific program. Smart of them.
Jessica is becoming unbearable. At least BJG was objective on certain topics--Jessica has become just another Democrat talking head.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Jessica arguing for straight racist polices is insane!
Jessica demonstrates a wonderful misunderstanding of basically every topic. Guns are the only topic she doesn't sound like a Socialist NPC.
Actually Jessica's advanced education shows quite clearly as she here shows her expertise with finance and the law.
@@jayron02001you should ask her out on a date. I’m sure she’ll consider it, given the way you simp for her. Good luck!!
I disagree with the end of your statement. Jessica offers no intelligence to the 2A conversation.
@@ExtremistOnboard I was not saying she adds much to the conversation, just that she doesn't scream "gun control!!!".
@@billl4977 simp? sympathise?
Amber is totally right
So is Jessica.
@@jayron02001how so?
Not if Jessica had to lie and move the goal post with every turn.
@@TheLavachild Be specific, Lava!
@@jayron02001 She wont date you brah. You have zero chance. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch
How did I know Jessica was going to defend racism 😀
That analogy Jessica presented with the card game is the worst Straw man I've heard in awhile.
So Jessica is saying most of the current wealth is DIRECTLY derived from slavery , what a dolt
Amber running laps around Jessica and Jessica doesn’t even realize it 😂
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
How is Jessica still on this show?
I'm glad that Amber FACT-CHECKED Jessica in real time since Jessica likes to go fact-checking other people.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Impressive mental gymnastics from Jess today!
Amber nailed it.
Jessica conflates everything to suit her agenda and Rising needs to look for her replacement.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Jessica voice is NAILSSSSS ON A CHALKBOARD
Jessica's poker example forgets ur not asking the guy that cheated u ur asking their grandkids and other people that were never playing in the first place
My thoughts exactly
You're asking the government that even 60 years ago sanctioned discrimination specifically against blacks at the benefit of whites to rectify damages done. It wasn't a bunch of rogue individuals, it was the US government.
Haiti paid reparations to France LONGGG after any slaveholders driven out were dead and gone.
ill gotten gains is ill gotten gains. We can come up with ways that’s more fair, for example I met a man who told me his father who fought in WW2, didn’t receive a GI bill after returning. I think that would be a more fair metric to fulfill that promise to black WW2 veterans, but we simply aren’t going to close significantly the racial wealth gap through individual efforts.
@@Mcedees24 I agree the government made promises that they never kept, but asking a group that failed u over and over to do the right think isn't going to work it's like asking ur partner to not to cheat knowing they go out and cheat on u every Saturday then expecting them to change. Sorry I have no faith in government
I support anyone who is currently alive and owned slaves should pay reparations directly to the slaves they owned.
I've been discriminated against regarding government benefits
Me too, no healthcare for me.
Thank you Amber for your sanity. Jessica is way off and proves degrees mean nothing 😂.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Jessica's ancestor swindled my ancestor in a card game. Jessica owes me some cash.
You left out the part where Jessica's ancesters use stolen ill gotten gains to buy property, insurance & better education for themself & all thiae connected to them to insure that their grandchildren didnt start from the bottom but enjoyed priviledges of a head start (not every family) plus the systemic historical & institutional discrimination that benefitted the grandparents & their offspring by design for generations. FACTS.
Uuffff... Jessica 🤦🏽
I do give her props for standing her ground no matter how unintentionally asinine
I think not...that's basically what participation awards are about.
It only becomes an issue when it’s to help black ppl.
Jessica's world view is races pitted against each other in a zero-sum game. I am concerned for her. There is no way to have peace or unity. Her card game analogy just called all non-black Americans cheaters and thieves because of slavery perpetrated prior to 1866 in America. The cheater and cheated are not sitting at that table in 2024, and Jessica just accused approximately 87% of the US population of the sin of enslaving people. Her behavior is reprehensible here.
Yes Jessica believes in socialistic leveling of our society. This has never worked and has created great harm in many ways including killing the incentives that are part of meritocracies! She needs to read some history about her awful agenda…..
When I watch segments here and read the comments, I see how much the conservatives hate Jessica and say they slightly miss the other host who was fired. But they didn't like the other left-leaning host either. Some type of comments So I think they want to hear their thoughts echoed back to themselves, and they won't like any leftist host.
I agree completely
A company can give money to whoever it wants too.
Jessica is completely uninformed. I literally unsubscribed yesterday because of her and came back this morning bc i thought maybe i was being silly. Nope. I used to love listening to Thr Hill but i can't listen her on any subject.
The Hill interviewing themselves. 😂
Investing in companies based on immutable characteristics is just plain foolish. You invest in companies that are viable. They have a product/service that you use and believe in.
But yt folks been doing this forever
@@l.austin2371 Exactly
jago.. nothing foolish about it. So long as there's an evaluation of the viabiity of each woman and their business before the grant is given, then it's reasonable, rational and likely to pay off.
@@jayron02001 as if they don't do that first smh
@@l.austin2371 correct.
Jessikkka at it again
People like like jessica alwsys cherry pick white vs black. What about white vs Indian or black vs chinese etc...
Jessica is stretching very far on this one.
Jessica makes me lose brain cells 90% of the time.
This presumption that the assets of slaveholders only increased and were directly inherited by immediate family amazes me. How do we know that if slaves had been given reparations, a good number wouldn't have lost it in bad investments, leaving their descendants with nothing anyway. Why is the presumption that they would have necessarily accumulated generational wealth?
The rationale for it is basedon on the fact of other Americans accumulating gemerational wealth.
But to the point, reparations have nothing to do with whether recipients and their progeny KEEP their new-found wealth.
Reparations are a debt owed to folks who had lost the opportunity to make a life for themselves and their progeny.
@@jayron02001 , I understand that. But why would we assume the descendants are due anything at all? That isn't how inheritance works. Maybe their ancestor specifically did not want their son or daughter to have anything. Then the grandchild would have nothing. We get into the territory of guessing what someone's last wishes were 5 generations ago, then 4 generations ago, then 3 generations ago. Next, did the company bankrupt in 1934? Are there any assets? It's not going to be simple, like I have black skin, therefore you owe me money. There were some blacks who also owned slaves. Do they pay or get paid?
@@jpvoodoo5522 Exactly, it has too much theoretical nonsense that needs to sorted through first. For example, I'm part Native American and Irish. Historical injustices were exacted on both groups, so do I get a paycheck for that? Is it even possible for the distribution of reparations to be fair in and of itself? This is why we have statutes of limitations -- you can't just sit on a claim forever, it'll expire at some point. All of the people had a good claim to reparations are dead buy now.
the crazy part is many reparations for slavery WERE given. like it already happened. many times. and often the reparations that former slaves were given was land that was originally occupied by indigenous americans so not only did they get reparations but they colonized while doing it. real history means nothing to anyone seems like.
ARABS WERE THE LAST TO STOP 🛑 SLAVERY. SO I AGREE WITH YOU. 💯❤️
Jessica knows nothing about the south. She should stick to what she knows, which is not much apparently
I hate when these Yankee progressives use the South for their ideological short comings.
Jessica's analogy to playing cards is insanely silly. Society is far too complex for such a silly analogy.
Also, she just ignores Amber when Amber fact checks her. It must be nice to be a progressive, you get to ignore reality.
I understand she is book smart, but she has not figured out that treating everybody kind and equally is the best policies.
Lol... Jessica must've seen the poll numbers from after the debate. She is salty af this morning 😂
Amber slaying as always.. love it!! 😃💪
Jessica doesn't care about constitutional rights
The fight for equality and discrimination are not the same thing.
Race relations is like a card game? Yeah... just like that, Jessica.
Jessica's ideological possession is legendary. And SUPER annoying!
Amber is great! While Jessica….not so much
Why do I get a headache listening to Jessica.
What about all of the families that didn't have slaves ? What about all of the people who came here after slavery ? Should those people be held accountable for something that they were not involved in ?
IF we want to equalize prejudice and make race more of an issue As a native American I think land should be given back. Call it an allotment to repair the wealth distribution too.
Re-selling Chinese-made fast fashion isn’t a business.
It makes no difference other than from a moral view where these families made their core wealth. Slavery was legal in America as well as around the world. When slavery was made unlawful that's when the funds earned were wrongly acquired. The law then granted 40 acres and a mule to blacks freed from slavery. Said and done. You cannot expect the people today to pay for the abuses of people from over a hundred and whatever years ago. My mother was a Holocaust survivor. Years later she as a victim was given reparations from Germany for the loss. I get no money because I'm not a Holacaust Survivors child. Those seeking rep
If I was playing cards honestly and find out someone was cheating. I will think that I am the better player.😂😂😂
It makes sense that Jessica is always fangirling kamala after hearing her calling for equity !
This is an opinion piece. The Fearless Fund considers it a WIN & is still in operation 😊
For a second there, I thought Jessica was suggesting that the “rich guys” running the grant program give gifts to the Supreme Court justices, á la Clarence Thomas’ acceptance of gifts from Harlan Crow.
It had nothing to do with what was written on the cake. It was because it was a wedding cake. They can have any other cake as long as it isn't a wedding cake.
Amazing. At the end of the segment, Jessica actually argues that businesses should have the right to deny service based on race. It's really hard to think of a more racist claim.
23 sec in the video and Jessica is to much for me😡
Jessica is insufferable.
Don't worry about the South. If you don't have something work for it.
9:46 "The Supreme in the past ruled that you can deny someone business based off of identity. You don't have to sell someone a wedding cake if they're..."
Response: "That's not accurate. That's not what the Supreme Court ruled." 👏
Her: (continues to misrepresent) 🥴
We are so used to someone intentionally misrepresenting this case (in media) that it is wonderful to see it rebuffed in real-time.
Amber has the more logical points here.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
But black people get less than 8% of buisness funding and grants loans, what you are talking about is BS
When will the hill look at the comments section and do the will of their viewers and find a replacement for jessica? Almost every videos comments are saying it.
Because the hill tries not to be an echo chamber. Granted, they shouldn’t have fired Bri. She could argue this issue better than Jess ever could
Did the guy that refused to write on the cake actually get sued multiple times for the same thing???
5:31 Jess if you don’t like America leave
Some one even turned mathematics racist 😂😂.
Racial equality and racial equity are two different things.
In fact equity requires inequality.
This is the kind of thing that ole john f Kennedy wanted congratulations you got for awhile
JFK sr, sadly his son is also deceased, was fighting for civil rights and especially VOTING rights. Im not sure I understand your comment. I am sure you don't believe that American citizens should not be allowed to vote based on the color of their skin, are you?
majority of people migrated here until late 1800s
I assume Jessica will be turning over her hosting slot to a person of color, on principle. Sorry to see her go.
Yes, Jessica, it is perfectly okay for "The Fearless Fund" _to give_ the Black ladies a _gift._ The problem is that the Fund, instead, offers the ladies _a contract_ which it cannot do unless it offers it to all women, regardless of the color of their skin. Amber, here, is not much closer to the constitutional mark. She has not read the 62 page decision, otherwise she would not characterize the facts as she does.
im sorry but the guy who brought this lawsuit against them is full of it. I mean it does feel like they are coming after minority spaces. some stuff should and is just for people of a certain community and that should not be threatening to everyone else
@@devanshepard9118💯% correct. Not surprised tho that people wanna get mad about this when it’s black people doing it, even tho every other ethnicity has done something similar
Collective financial punishment .....from the past.
Just stopped by to see if the Hill was watchable again. Nope.
Unbelievable. Now THIS is propaganda.
Good. Time to end this race based bs. Time for the Hill the replace this insufferable co host jessica Burbank
Jessica’s card game analogy made me was to die
They didn’t ask the question in the right way they should ask her to her face on air. Is it black women Ing themselves divisive , and give her all the oxygen she needs to answer that question because we want to hear this one
Jessica is a kid.
Omg. Listening to her is crazy. It’s pretty funny.
So Amber is going to let Jess close it out and then she interrupts. Like always.
And very glad she did!!!
@@scottross6618 Amber is a rude child.
I knew the 2020 post Floyd trend won’t last.
Yep cuz at the end of the day, everyone benefits from the black person being down, similar to how we all benefit from Africa being poor
I remember Jess saying to Robby in another conversation that Trump's idea to create a new cabinet led by Elon to reduce bureaucracy is in fact adding to bureaucracy. Ok, fair enough. However, then why does she think the discrimination is ok to fight the cause against..uh...er...ummm.. discrimination?! Doesn't anyone ascribe to the old adage, "Two wrongs don't make a right"?
i dont see how the fearless fund was being discriminating. It was much needed to help black woman . some stuff is just for people in a certain community
@@devanshepard9118they talk about black ppl not helping their community but when try to help they now are mad
@@reneegraham2201say it louder for the people in the back
Oh, Amber. I'm so sorry... again. I don't know how do you do it, but I commend you. Having to deal with Nomi and Jessica should entitle you to bottomless wine glasses all across DC.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Amber "let me give you the last word" Jessica ::lies immediately:: Amber "I regret my choices"
As aways... Jessica is the worst.
Hey Robby going to apologize for Springfield,Ohio?
Robby isn't here right meow.
You will have to paws your criticism until Monday
Is there a Springfield update?
@@bigplanslittledrive4791 Ha I see what you did there.
For the truth why?
And once again when immigrants come in and use that argument, you have to stop them in their tracks and remind them why are they here and when they’re here they decide to pay the debts of the land. This is not an argument for them. This is internal and if they were smart, they will stay out of this.
kudooooos to Jessica
The Hill should stop only covering DEI when it comes to race. It also includes people with disabilities, women, LGBTQ, etc.... Cover all of the groups not just race.
Well because race grifters are the ones pushing it for the most part
No that's the Americans with disabilities act. That's not dei
@@dougsfriendskeeter That is both. The Americans with disabilities act is a joke. Besides helping people with physical disabilities gain access to buildings, it has done nothing of what it was intended to do especially with career inclusion.
@@tonyg76 I guess this is a subject near and dear to you, but making it part and parcel of the ESG/DEI agenda is a bit much...that goes for the women and LGBTQ aspects as well. How about let's not enshrine discrimination into institutional governmental policies.
@@BWolf00 1) Enshrine discrimination? That is what DEI in theory is supposed to be preventing. 2) How are disabilities too much for DEI when that it was it is intended to address?
Jessica - The three wealthiest demographics in America are Chinese-Americans, Indian-Americans, and Jewish-Americans all grouping that did not benefit from slavery or contributed to the prolonging of slavery.
Jewish individuals/families received reparations-compensation for the suffering of their ancestors. Other immigrants did not die for "Civil rights" in USA but they benefit from those opportunities to have access to the best education in America, money for businesses & credit, access to housing. You prove a point here other groups were not brought here in chains to build this country for Free but get to Enjoy & take advantage of the Fruit of other's Labor with an easier path & navigation somehow 😮
@@sleo6664Exactly. These hypocrites know that. They love changing narratives to suit their lies.
@@sleo6664nothing but facts here king. Well said
Worst teleprompter reading ever 😅
Jessica lady is nuts.
Amber is as thick as a plank. According to an NPR analysis Black farmers have consistently been left behind by the USDA’s loan system. In 1999, Black farmers joined the Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit against the agency, alleging discrimination that resulted in the loss of their land and farms. But when the case was settled, many who were eligible to receive a payout never saw their money due to overly confusing filing processes. The payout to the Black farmers was almost 30yrs overdue. People talk about equity among races while still heavily redlining Black people in Ununited States of America.
Jess again has a hot take that is completely wrong...she's not a very deep thinker
I haven’t found that Jessica puts much stock in accuracy.