@@WakeRunSleep That is what he said back then. In Search of Enemies can be found on line for free and recently I found the books people are selling. John refused to allow the CIA to censor his book even though he wrote it in the form of a novel not an autobiography.
Anyone not familiar with John's material needs to look up his old lectures and writings. He's excellent, and they can give people a much more realistic world view.
The memory hole, here on RUclips is a good source of his interviews, particularly with the Houston show from the 80's called "Alternative views". ruclips.net/video/lSCOKoT4GTI/видео.html. The only problem lies in the fact that no one is an "ex-CIA" and is still breathing...
@@Sueezedtight Thanks for the heads-up. BTW, I'm pretty sure Alternative Views was filmed in Austin, under the auspices of ACTV - Austin Community TV. I was helping to produce public TV shows there too, way back when. :-) The public needs to reclaim its place in media; it is probably the single most harmful institution, after debt-based money.
Who's here from the Snowden tweet Also how did this guy speak publicly without getting in huge trouble with the government especially back in those days
@@Str8fac3 The tone and rhythm seems a bit less specific to me. Check out the SICP lectures by MIT (1986), for example (Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs): quite similar cadence.
Glenn Gleenwald added important context to this critical information, pointing out how Mr. Snepp was hounded and vilified for decades. They simply cannot allow honesty.
Yup - Insert practically anywhere on the globe: from Guatemala and Iran after WWII right up to Latin America, the Middle East and Asia today - “Full Spectrum Dominance” - courtesy of the CIA, MI6 in the UK, Israel’s ‘Mossad’ ..etc., - it’s all still in full swing, business is booming and as toxic as ever. It’d be a shorter list to insert where the war pimps *haven’t* tried to worm their way in.
@@uncleho1945 I don't think it's helpful to equate the normal/ignorant people living in america, with the people making the decisions to do the terrible things discussed in this video freedom of speech suffered from this situation on a conceptual level. also the millions that were destroyed because of this situation have also suffered. I think this seems worse than that first example, but both are still very serious. both are terrible. one is physical and tangible and real. the other is conceptual, but still very real.
Andrew Breitbart's interviews and book "Righteous Indignation" chronicles how Los Angeles was populated by Frankfurt School intellectuals who made it a current hub of CIA (Rand Corp) and UN Agenda operations. Los Angeles has a direct link to Auckland New Zealand. The reason "woke" spreads and Hollywood "owns" the narrative is Frankfurt School intellectuals.
11:30 Required to submit anything you write to government for censorship. Even if there are no secrets involved.| Supreme court said he was obliged to submit even "non-secrets" for censorship.
my man , we still can't get the current generation to learn from these videos if you show this to anyone they'll call you a "Russian bot" or "Putin apologist" or any of the other dumb stuff they spout
You have no idea how much wide info are stocked nowadays... I seriously wonder how "They" will manage to erase everything to solidify their narrative against the majority. they sure will try... anyways, for now, there's MANY lonely wolf with good CPU downloading and archiving everything on his old AF disk.. lel. Pretty ironic. Let's never forget and never forgive. ;-)
The part at 7:25 is exactly what a DEA agent would do to gain trust in drug dealers. Every source the agent would give to dealers, those whom he was trying to gain trust to eventually arrest, would already be a dead person.
The example of planting disinformation, then talking to an ambassador of another country to make sure the reporter gets the same disinformtion from that source neatly fits into the explanation Prof. John Mearsheimer in his book "Why leaders lie", where he states that governments have no problem lying to their citizens, but are not lying to other governments. Why is that? Because every government operates that way!
Just look at what they did to Gary Webb. Not a single one of the big publications apologized for how they treated him despite the fact that HE WAS RIGHT!!!
I will always remember how Michael Moore in the movie Fahrenheit 911 had this little segment that seems like few noticed or remembered. There was a neighborhood group that had started up to address local political issues. A man joined this group and came to the meetings and no one thought it strange. That is, until his death was reported in the papers and it turned out that he was a law enforcement officer that lived in another town. He was reporting on the actions and minutes of this group. It is my belief that this is happening all over, and what they cannot get people to surveil they are using technology - on all of us. I think this throws into question virtually everything about our lives, our country, our civilization, our reality. The countries of the world need to end this competition that terrifies everyone - all countries are terrorist and all citizens are terrorized - and war and start working together. Reagan said it in the context of nuclear arms, but our country's reality is just as important, we need to be able to ask question, get answers, prove that the answer are right, question them, criticize them - TRUST BUT VERIFY.
Every year that goes by, our government gets more authoritarian. So even tho back than they didn't like him talking, there wasn't much they could do. Sure kill him but that would have brought so much attention. And the media wasn't totally bought off like they are today. Now, to come out with this you know the government will come at you with everything. Threaten you with long prison sentence. The media who's now been totally controlled would smear you. Most people who don't know would just think you're a traitor. Plus now there so much money for these guys if they keep parroting establishment line. Msnbc contracts. Book deals. Consultants to some corporation. A lot of big money for these guys now once they get out
I think there the term "ex-CIA" is a contradiction in itself. More likely, this whole "from Saul to Paul"-shtick is just another role, another cover, but for what purpose? I think that is the real question here.
exactly. in these videos of ex-cia agents, they just confirm what we already knew/assumed. we expect them to do this stuff. they are however not going over the true REASONS for all this. also, they overtly show how powerful they are, how they have control over everyone and they dictate things, but again, who is really behind everything?
@@vladbishbosch It's an interesting thought. There's long been a theory that certain actors (no pun intended whatsoever) are controlled-opposition, and they're here to perpetuate an illusion that hopefully will convince Americans and the rest of the world that the U.S. government and their intelligence is like a giant octopus with boundless tentacles, reaching across the globe and constricting everyone and everything in its path. The obvious reason being that--in reality--the scope of the U.S. government's power is, in fact, totally limited, minuscule, and perhaps not nearly as effective as we're led to believe. No different than like the tale of some legendary monster of folklore, told from generation to generation to keep children from misbehaving or something. Unfortunately, I think that theory is more fiction than anything, but it wouldn't shock me if Edward Snowden or whoever was actually just another government psyop. At this point, I think anything goes.
Probably used to justify what the CIA did next, which was to officially shut down any chance of this happening again. Then a year later they trot out their defector asset Bezmenov to make the exact same claim about the KGB. All in one: damage control that implicates the USSR and justifies these illicit activities because "everyone else does it", justification for less oversight and a complete media blackout of their operations - closing the loop against future leaks to journalists.
They couldn't possibly be feeding us a bunch of b.s. today about China Taiwan, Russia Ukraine, the DPRK, Cuba, Israel Palestine, and Israel Iran, now could they? It just couldn't be the case, correct? Right?
@@anastunya Very, very true. However, it's also something the powers-that-be are steadily trying to repress with cancellations, deplatformings, and censorship.
I don't think that they do such stuff anymore. I would say that now they have a much tighter grip on the media, much more direct, not these subtle methods involving gaining confidence etc. Some media are directly subordinated to them. One could call it the intelligence-media complex.
His playbook was in full use for the Covid19 Disinformation campaign that stole elections in New Zealand and USA in 2020. What he didn't have that they had in 2020 was Bots and a CCP operational to be an effective partner along with Iranian Mullahs. A CIA analyst warned in a 2018 report that New Zealand was fully compromised to CCP. His report was ignored. They tested the messaging using Ardern in NZ (Easter Bunny is Essential - see Governor of Montana follows suit), and then spread through 5 Eyes. What Ardern started in 2020 Canadian Trucker Protests of February 2022 ended exposing Trudeau.
he must have been a KGB double agent, because the CIA and the US would never do things like that. we play by the book and never lie, because we are the good guys and fight for democracy all over the world.
He objected to the word "used" when referring to the journalists he used to plant half-truths, and instead corrected the interviewer and said they "targeted" those journalists (not "used") but there is no difference. They did USE journalists and tricked them with half-truths to convince them that all of it was true.
Some interesting quotes from a former CIA agent, for future. 9:20 CIA should be Amoral 9:37 keep.the morality out, keep truth in stay away from disinformation
Dont you think it is convenient that this defector/double agent began making the exact same claim as Snepp but about the USSR, just the following year as Snepp did, in 1984? That is classic american projection to mask a very large and damning leak.
Nothing new under the sun! A fat lot of good it did them though! Perhaps if intelligence had focused their efforts more constructively the outcome might have been different
Snowden brought me here.
who cares just watch the damn video.
Me too!
Alex Jones brought me here.
Me too. Snowden.
I wouldn't follow Alex Jones into a bar. 😂
I have no idea who brought me here 😜
When John Stockwell was sued by the CIA and ordered to hand over all profits from his book, he decided to give the book away for free.
Is this true?
@@WakeRunSleep That is what he said back then. In Search of Enemies can be found on line for free and recently I found the books people are selling.
John refused to allow the CIA to censor his book even though he wrote it in the form of a novel not an autobiography.
Anyone not familiar with John's material needs to look up his old lectures and writings. He's excellent, and they can give people a much more realistic world view.
The memory hole, here on RUclips is a good source of his interviews, particularly with the Houston show from the 80's called "Alternative views". ruclips.net/video/lSCOKoT4GTI/видео.html. The only problem lies in the fact that no one is an "ex-CIA" and is still breathing...
@@Sueezedtight Thanks for the heads-up. BTW, I'm pretty sure Alternative Views was filmed in Austin, under the auspices of ACTV - Austin Community TV. I was helping to produce public TV shows there too, way back when. :-)
The public needs to reclaim its place in media; it is probably the single most harmful institution, after debt-based money.
Who's here from the Snowden tweet
Also how did this guy speak publicly without getting in huge trouble with the government especially back in those days
He did...
Most of us
The tone and rhythm when speaking is a possible tell of people who work in ‘intelligence’.
The Snowden tweet thread suggests he was "sued into silence" by the CIA.
@@Str8fac3 The tone and rhythm seems a bit less specific to me. Check out the SICP lectures by MIT (1986), for example (Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs): quite similar cadence.
Thank you Snowden for helping us get to a transparent path
Fake News runs deep, even deeper than I had originally thought. Shout-out to Edward Snowden for tweeting out this absolute gem!
Thank you Edward Snowden for promoting this video.
Glenn Gleenwald added important context to this critical information, pointing out how Mr. Snepp was hounded and vilified for decades. They simply cannot allow honesty.
Insert Ukraine for Vietnam.
Same as it ever was.
Yup - Insert practically anywhere on the globe: from Guatemala and Iran after WWII right up to Latin America, the Middle East and Asia today - “Full Spectrum Dominance” - courtesy of the CIA, MI6 in the UK, Israel’s ‘Mossad’ ..etc., - it’s all still in full swing, business is booming and as toxic as ever.
It’d be a shorter list to insert where the war pimps *haven’t* tried to worm their way in.
It is necessary for everyone to be pious Catholics to be saved.
Probably the most important and disturbing video to have resurfaced in recent years.
13:05 "One of the victims of the Vietnam War was the first amendment."
Love your work Matt
the way he says this is kind of chilling, like he feels defeated, no?
@@uncleho1945 I don't think it's helpful to equate the normal/ignorant people living in america, with the people making the decisions to do the terrible things discussed in this video
freedom of speech suffered from this situation on a conceptual level.
also the millions that were destroyed because of this situation have also suffered. I think this seems worse than that first example, but both are still very serious.
both are terrible. one is physical and tangible and real. the other is conceptual, but still very real.
Here from Snowden's tweet. Thank you!
CIA: We feed “Exclusive BS Stories” to the most influential Journalists
🙃🙂🙃
The journalist asking the questions is Clete Roberts, he was with channel 5 in Los Angeles.
Andrew Breitbart's interviews and book "Righteous Indignation" chronicles how Los Angeles was populated by Frankfurt School intellectuals who made it a current hub of CIA (Rand Corp) and UN Agenda operations. Los Angeles has a direct link to Auckland New Zealand. The reason "woke" spreads and Hollywood "owns" the narrative is Frankfurt School intellectuals.
11:30 Required to submit anything you write to government for censorship. Even if there are no secrets involved.| Supreme court said he was obliged to submit even "non-secrets" for censorship.
Even "non-secrets" can be "sensitive" (although not "classified"); hence, the Supreme Court ruled that he was obliged to protect "non-secrets".
More like keep secrets to keep from embarrassing politicians
Has someone archived videos like these for future generations to learn from?
my man , we still can't get the current generation to learn from these videos
if you show this to anyone they'll call you a "Russian bot" or "Putin apologist" or any of the other dumb stuff they spout
@@amrshatlaa9617 Word.
You have no idea how much wide info are stocked nowadays...
I seriously wonder how "They" will manage to erase everything to solidify their narrative against the majority.
they sure will try...
anyways, for now, there's MANY lonely wolf with good CPU downloading and archiving everything on his old AF disk.. lel.
Pretty ironic.
Let's never forget and never forgive. ;-)
@@amrshatlaa9617 we live in a clown world. Lucifer affect in full effect!
Future generations don't learn from lies
The way around it for your novel is to write it as a fiction, the truth can only be told through fiction.
He said he would had to submit for censorship everything, including fiction
Operation Mockingbird.
💯 Nice to see you here!
10:31 slipped up there. Assassination program.
The part at 7:25 is exactly what a DEA agent would do to gain trust in drug dealers.
Every source the agent would give to dealers, those whom he was trying to gain trust to eventually arrest, would already be a dead person.
DEA flodded black neighborhoods with the drugs in the first place
evil
Same yesterday as today
The example of planting disinformation, then talking to an ambassador of another country to make sure the reporter gets the same disinformtion from that source neatly fits into the explanation Prof. John Mearsheimer in his book "Why leaders lie", where he states that governments have no problem lying to their citizens, but are not lying to other governments. Why is that? Because every government operates that way!
They are extracting our tax dollars. 33T of them.
Reporter: CIA and morals?
CIA: CIA men are amoral
🧐🤨😳
such a legendary video, >5years online but
Just look at what they did to Gary Webb. Not a single one of the big publications apologized for how they treated him despite the fact that HE WAS RIGHT!!!
This is on overdrive now.
A lot of fancy ways of saying "I lied"
"propagandizing the American public or Congress is not the CIAs job"best laugh I've had all week I may have woke the neighbors with that one
The reporter was the venerable Bill Stout who seemed to always be true to his name.
I will always remember how Michael Moore in the movie Fahrenheit 911 had this little segment that seems like few noticed or remembered.
There was a neighborhood group that had started up to address local political issues. A man joined this group and came to the meetings and no one thought it strange. That is, until his death was reported in the papers and it turned out that he was a law enforcement officer that lived in another town. He was reporting on the actions and minutes of this group.
It is my belief that this is happening all over, and what they cannot get people to surveil they are using technology - on all of us. I think this throws into question virtually everything about our lives, our country, our civilization, our reality.
The countries of the world need to end this competition that terrifies everyone - all countries are terrorist and all citizens are terrorized - and war and start working together.
Reagan said it in the context of nuclear arms, but our country's reality is just as important, we need to be able to ask question, get answers, prove that the answer are right, question them, criticize them - TRUST BUT VERIFY.
The irony of Reagan saying that of ALL presidents.
Clinton, Obama and Biden. Very bad. President Reagan was an excellent POTUS. Best ever. Only commies/commiecrats hated him.
SURELY this is no longer happening. 😜
lol
...ty ES
Damn. I've sill got Decent Interval on my bookshelf, though it's years since I read it :)
Disinformation: Not a lie. It is a 1/2 truth 🤪😜😝
That was interesting 🤦🏾
I agree, what the hell is that.
This clip is EXACTLY what he is explains they want "put out." Makes you wish you knew what he wasn't "putting out."
Status quo for a long time now. Partner these techniques with the mass surveillance and this is where we are at today
How was this allowed? How did the government allow one of their own to say all those secrets and methods?
Yup, the same q popped up in my head. Nowadays he wouldn't be walking around safely after those revelations
Every year that goes by, our government gets more authoritarian. So even tho back than they didn't like him talking, there wasn't much they could do. Sure kill him but that would have brought so much attention. And the media wasn't totally bought off like they are today. Now, to come out with this you know the government will come at you with everything. Threaten you with long prison sentence. The media who's now been totally controlled would smear you. Most people who don't know would just think you're a traitor. Plus now there so much money for these guys if they keep parroting establishment line. Msnbc contracts. Book deals. Consultants to some corporation. A lot of big money for these guys now once they get out
I think there the term "ex-CIA" is a contradiction in itself. More likely, this whole "from Saul to Paul"-shtick is just another role, another cover, but for what purpose? I think that is the real question here.
"ex-CIA" because he already left the agency at the time of the interview. After he left, he wrote a book in 1977 about his experience in VietNam .
exactly. in these videos of ex-cia agents, they just confirm what we already knew/assumed. we expect them to do this stuff. they are however not going over the true REASONS for all this. also, they overtly show how powerful they are, how they have control over everyone and they dictate things, but again, who is really behind everything?
@@vladbishbosch It's an interesting thought. There's long been a theory that certain actors (no pun intended whatsoever) are controlled-opposition, and they're here to perpetuate an illusion that hopefully will convince Americans and the rest of the world that the U.S. government and their intelligence is like a giant octopus with boundless tentacles, reaching across the globe and constricting everyone and everything in its path. The obvious reason being that--in reality--the scope of the U.S. government's power is, in fact, totally limited, minuscule, and perhaps not nearly as effective as we're led to believe. No different than like the tale of some legendary monster of folklore, told from generation to generation to keep children from misbehaving or something.
Unfortunately, I think that theory is more fiction than anything, but it wouldn't shock me if Edward Snowden or whoever was actually just another government psyop. At this point, I think anything goes.
Probably used to justify what the CIA did next, which was to officially shut down any chance of this happening again. Then a year later they trot out their defector asset Bezmenov to make the exact same claim about the KGB. All in one: damage control that implicates the USSR and justifies these illicit activities because "everyone else does it", justification for less oversight and a complete media blackout of their operations - closing the loop against future leaks to journalists.
Does anyone ever really leave the agency.
They couldn't possibly be feeding us a bunch of b.s. today about China Taiwan, Russia Ukraine, the DPRK, Cuba, Israel Palestine, and Israel Iran, now could they? It just couldn't be the case, correct? Right?
But now, thanks to our military, we have the internet as an alternative source of news.
@@anastunya Very, very true. However, it's also something the powers-that-be are steadily trying to repress with cancellations, deplatformings, and censorship.
He says the coverage of Vietnam was very good.
Told you!
Well if you are a big name politician you can "write a book" and "give speech ",a way to get deferred payoffs
What ever happened to these truth-tellers?
Snepp became a reporter. He has a RUclips channel.
Is that what happened to Stockwell?
I don't think that they do such stuff anymore. I would say that now they have a much tighter grip on the media, much more direct, not these subtle methods involving gaining confidence etc. Some media are directly subordinated to them. One could call it the intelligence-media complex.
His playbook was in full use for the Covid19 Disinformation campaign that stole elections in New Zealand and USA in 2020. What he didn't have that they had in 2020 was Bots and a CCP operational to be an effective partner along with Iranian Mullahs. A CIA analyst warned in a 2018 report that New Zealand was fully compromised to CCP. His report was ignored. They tested the messaging using Ardern in NZ (Easter Bunny is Essential - see Governor of Montana follows suit), and then spread through 5 Eyes. What Ardern started in 2020 Canadian Trucker Protests of February 2022 ended exposing Trudeau.
Yup. No need to instruct the media. They know what they're supposed to do.
The MSM is still Fake News!
13:30 The land of freedom looks like "Landing Number 1" idealized by George Orwell in 1984.
Would love some more info on the interview itself. Where and when was this recorded? Who is the interviewer?
if only you could read
The Description says a University of Southern California Conference. Open the description and it lists credits and details.
@@alicewest4671 got it, thanks Alice!
Why was he talking to the NZ Ambassador at this time? The Opal File
Half truth is a LIE.
he must have been a KGB double agent, because the CIA and the US would never do things like that. we play by the book and never lie, because we are the good guys and fight for democracy all over the world.
🤣🤣🤣 I like your sarcasm 😊
@@Skousen77 i was being serious....
CIA Pompeo, “We lie, we cheat, we steal.”
He objected to the word "used" when referring to the journalists he used to plant half-truths, and instead corrected the interviewer and said they "targeted" those journalists (not "used") but there is no difference. They did USE journalists and tricked them with half-truths to convince them that all of it was true.
So, can we consider some of what he says, "disinformation?"
9:17 - amorality IS immorality. There is no discrepancy
Amoral is immoral and a breach of 5 US 3331.
What's the name of the interviewer, anyone knows?
Someone else here said it was "Bill Stout"
Clete Roberts
But now, thanks to our military, we have the internet as an alternative source of news.
Free country?
I wonder how many American soldiers died for no reason as a result of the great patriot Frank Snepp.
Don't worry guys. They totally don't do this stuff anymore....(lol)
Some interesting quotes from a former CIA agent, for future.
9:20 CIA should be Amoral
9:37 keep.the morality out, keep truth in stay away from disinformation
Does anyone here know if Frank is still alive?
This was in 1983, doubt it but the govt treated him like Snowden & Assange for telling the truth.
It is a good thing that we got that whole CIA propaganda thing worked out.
Too bad it has no volume. waste of time tyo listen too. I guess u-tube see's to the volume.
This only has 40k views
What da fuckkkj
6:55
can we get this to 3.3K likes
is this more disinformation?
I love the CIA when it ovethrows the bad guys
#jakepaul #dojacat #VMAs
See what u did there
He’s basically telling us that he did the same things that Yuri Bezmenov told us he did with the KGB, but were the good guys for sure!
@@sIXXIsDesigns I’ve been hip for 15 years man
Dont you think it is convenient that this defector/double agent began making the exact same claim as Snepp but about the USSR, just the following year as Snepp did, in 1984? That is classic american projection to mask a very large and damning leak.
Nothing new under the sun!
A fat lot of good it did them though! Perhaps if intelligence had focused their efforts more constructively the outcome might have been different