I often thought that Alexander Waugh was an interesting guy, but after watching this video, which has has shed so much more light on his thought processes, I now find him quite fascinating.
🙏 yes God bless the dude. we are all still living in the dark ages 5:55 or there abouts ☝️ this all .clicks with my own studies. on music and nature.. what a brilliant man. R.I.P AW 🙏
What a fascinating interview. I'm a huge admirer of Alexander's grandfather, one of the best authors in the English language. So to hear Alexander talk with such passion and eloquence about the authorship of Shakespeare's plays, and such topics as secrecy and official lies, just blew my mind. I cannot thank you enough James for this and everything you have done especially in the last few years.
Great discussion. Alexander Waugh is a wonderful thinker and commentator. His presentations are remarkable and so much more worthy than anything offered in mainstream. I do hope very much his condition is improved. (=Ivermectin)
Thank you, Gentlemen. A splendid discourse. I worked as Deputy head of Sound at The Royal Shakespeare Company, Barbican Theatre, London for 16 years. It was widely known that the pen belonged to Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. I worked closely with Chief Voice Coach, Cicely (Ciss) Berry. Ciss would catch my eye in the Green Room; bribe me with a cigarette and cup of tea. We would go to the Recording Room and hunt through mountains of quarter inch tape, cassette and CD to find her target dialect. I would then copy to short cassettes for Cicely to work with her required actors. Ciss was (I think she passed in 2018) an absolute Queen....of course I should say Princess 🤭. She was a force to be reckoned with. When she was on site in London she would conduct the daily pre show Vocal Warm-Ups in the Main House Auditorium. Ciss was so loved and respected that heavy duty Lead Actors would especially turn up. This was an incredible boost to Company Moral and the confidence building of young Actors. Ciss was down to earth. She had a profound feeling for the delivery of 'The Iambic Pentameter'. She knew ALL the cuss words and would not hesitate to deliver them with consummate aplomb when the situation required. Ciss had the twinkle of a ballet dancer and the audio lexicon of a seasoned Choreographer. The real deal. God bless you, Cicely Berry. ♥️
it was a team of writers, incl de Vere and Bacon and the Spear Shakers, the same as most written or visual productions today being a product of many unnamed contributors
The knowledge and literature stands alone for anyone to discover but it has been expropriated by the middle classes and denied to ordinary people by funneling them into state education. The best schools that teach it are reserved for them. What is worse is that we used to have a plethora of small independent book shops where people could discover interesting books outside the education system. Now they are gone and very few people read. We have entered an age of illiteracy that is ideal for the exercise of tyranny. Thank goodness for the growth in home schooling encouraging individuality and independent thinking. A small ray of hope amidst the descending darkness.
Absolutely fascinating, engaging and thoughtful discussion. I had the opportunity to meet and interview Auberon Waugh...and Alexander has the admirable and extraordinary best aspects of his father and grandfather.
My college Shakespeare professor refused to discuss questions of authorship when students attempted to ask... sometimes he'd get visibly angry. I found out from one of his grad students a year or so later that he was indeed a skeptic, but was incredibly fearful of his peers, who were hardcore Stratfordians. Anecdotal, to be sure, but I think it speaks to the intense power that the Traditionalists have over those who doubt the official story.
😂 yes Alex has a great sense of humour .. so did the earl of oxford. those nasa guys. the globe theatre of course is in the round.. a ring. Isssiah 40 22 .
How did we get where we are today? Nominalism, and how it can be used for the benefit of oligarchs Also, Evelyn Waugh was absolutely right to be disillusioned with the RCC after Vatican II. Shows the sincerity and integrity of the man
This was a fantastic interview and so interesting as I thought Shakespeare was Sir Francis Bacon, how wrong were those who thought it true! Alexander’s a true genius. I listened to this twice on the Delingpod as there’s sooo much information.
Alexander Waugh was waking up to the Truth Movement reality boldly and directly. He was understanding how the reality of of the Elizabethan era must be related to the current world to be properly understood. They may have taken him out for this reason. But he set an example of what must be done. We must all join the battle and tactically move forward as best we can.
Having watched a number of Alexander's videos beforehand, it is refreshing to hear him condense so many of his earlier significant points, while bringing out others besides. One's responses are obviously personal, but, for my part, I find I can relate most readily to Alexander's conclusions concerning the Shakespeare Authorship Question, and much else. FWIW I have an empathy also with the experience of Hank Whittemore, in his endeavour to fully understand the Sonnets. As bizarre as it may seem, I had my own damascene moment when addressing myself to the subject of the Whitechapel Murders, wherein one detects the subtle hand of Freemasonry, again manifest in a veil of letters and numbers. As Alexander recounts, it is far from obvious, but once seen it cannot be ignored.
Truth is stranger than fiction and the fiction associating Freemasonic members and the murders in Stepney is a wishful fiction. Masonry has plenty of interesting and sordid associations with individuals like Oscar Wilde and Aleister Crowley not to mention Joseph Smith and his plagiarism of masonic lore to create his own religion. There have been so many corruptions of the Lodge system and masonry like that of "Gods Banker" & P2 that it's difficult for outsiders sometimes to see that corrupt individuals and corporations have used the guise of masonry to shield & disguise their own malevolent aims. Take the weeds out of the garden and you get some pretty wonderful harvests.
Alexander Waugh is the very type and strain of obstinant and plain speaking gentleman that makes the pretenders pale in comparison. I will forever sorely miss his great and humorous presentations, that put him for a time (in the most duplicitous of times) at the head of the illustrious Oxfordian phalanx that laid waste to the arguments of those who refuse to even consider our collected history might now and then be or have been false and misleading, not to mention deliberately obfiscated for profit or for slavish orthodoxy. Vale Alexander.
Only just started, and not subbed to your channel; but will be now! Many thanks for this. I came to know Waugh’s work through my many years of research into the occult, theology and so forth. He’s an amazing researcher and a great narrator, absolutely love his work. Got yourself a new subscriber for sure, thanks again!
I watched your conversation twice today, as I was doing chores-----I wanted to remember more of the details------thank you! I am posting to you, a URL of a New York Times article, talking about foods which fight cancer. At the top of the list (for me) are artichokes and dandelion roots, which cause apoptosis. (And you understand the Greek.) (I actually studied Greek when I was in college--it makes the world more understandable.) Even if you were to drink off the shelf dandelion root tea, it would help. I have a chronic blood cancer and my numbers are almost normal----I have never had to take chemo. I just want you to be healthy! About 8 months ago, I was watching German lessons (I worked in Germany) and RUclips suggested your talk about the triple tau and such. It has changed my life. I watch a lot of your talks and the SOF---I am really happy to find out about Edward de Vere, as I have always felt uncomfortable about the Shaksper guy. A friend of mine recently asked me to read "Will in the World.'' When I was finished, I said that we would still have to agree to disagree, because the book was written in the subjunctive. A friend of mine, who has a background in philosophy, told me that since the Chinese traditional medicine, such as dandelion root and magnolia bark--have been used successfully for thousands of years, makes them proved empirically----almost as good as the scientific method. And all medicine was like this, before the discovery of germ theory. Here is the NYT article---------- www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/well/eat/food-diet-cancer-risk.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Bk0.FDkI.X3z1lrYqFTqa&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
He made astonishing discoveries that amaze me still. So gutted. There's no one like him. I never heard him mention it, but I believe he was a direct descendant of De Vere through his grandmother, a Herbert.
Very much. Also very suspicious. Unjected. See his Instagrim message. Umbrella tip envenomed bumped in a corridor, train station? Hadn't heard any EDV ancestry. Forward any intel. Cheers.
Very much enjoyed your interview with Alexander . I've been following him for a long time & always look forward to hearing from him. Something is bothering me though James, is Alexander OK? I thought he looked unwell, not like himself at all. Hope he's OK🙏
*@Mountain Hare:* Like you I'm a long time admirer of Alexander Waugh. In fact I often put his channel on a loop and listen during the overnight hours. I felt the same thing when I saw him here. He looks unwell and I've very concerned.
Yes glad I'm not the only one to notice. I did a double take when I saw him, compared to a year ago he looks so thin...I pray he is OK , such a gifted and lovely man.@@ginawiggles918
My rule of thumb is to never believe conspiracy theories unless they are more probably true than the alternative. They do, sometimes, exist. Almost always, they do not.
we have to do our own research.. and it isn't easy with all the censorship going on. digital book burning .. suppression of information.. ☝️ there are a bunch of very popular opportunists and grifters putting out false info. along with think tanks videos.. manufacturing peoples opinions.. it's literally psychological warfare trying to find the truth.. avoid anything popular 🙏
Wonderful! Indeed, It is fun to play the numbers! In Psalm 46, the King James Translators chose to place the word “shake” 46 words down from the top and “spear” 46 words from the bottom. More importantly, they put the key to spiritual growth in verse 10: “Be still, and know that I am God”. I can best put this in a poem: All numbers, be they even, odd, / When well-considered lead to God / The humble mind thus uses will / To know His graces and be still.
A good companion book to "The Secret History of the World" by Mark Booth is "Philosophy between the Lines" by Arthur Melzer, a history of esoteric writing. Alexander Waugh is an amazing man.
Now with some coad spelling. I thoroughly enjoyed this even though I’m definitely not the literary type. Well done and thank you! Just one thing. I’m very puzzled that you, James, think that Newton’s Principia is junk on a par with the current klighmατε ßolloχ. His laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation stand today. Admittedly they need to be modified when it comes to the very small (quantum mechanics) and the very large/massive and at very high speeds (special and general relativity) but one only has to work with them to see for oneself that how stunningly acute they are at explaining so much about the physical world and so incredibly accurately. But doing so requires a certain level of mathematics without which no understanding is possible. However, that acquaintance can be readily had by anyone prepared to make the effort and is no bar in the way you intimate. In particular Newton’s works are about as far from the utter lighs, schtt and ßolloχ of the κoммιε-ßstard klighmaτε phayckers that it is possible to get. By the way, Newton couched pretty much everything in the Principia in geometric terms even though equivalent constructions are more readily apparent when done using his calculus. But mathematicians and natural philosophers (physicists) were familiar in 1687 with geometry and Newton had not published his calculus. He wouldn’t have published anything if Edmund Halley hadn’t pushed him to do so. But when he did, he did so with his intended readership and their capabilities in mind. If you want an authoritative view on the Principia I suggest the book by I Bernard Cohen, ‘The Principia: The Authoritative Translation: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’. About £15 for the 600-page paperback. For what it’s worth I agree with almost everything you say about almost everything. All the very best to you.
I find it interesting that these guys agree on the Shakespeare authorship issue, namely that there is no evidence whatsoever that the man from Stratford wrote the plays and poems attributed to him, and yet they have no such issues with the existence of God.
God is all around us bro. it's what binds the universe together. it's in everyone and everything.. we see the patterns in nature. and in the poetry.. "enlightenment" ☝️ is what's the renesance was all about. then "they" threw us back into the dark ages.. and this is where we find ourselves in this modern day and age.. still in the dark ages.. 😳
Yes, Richard III was a hunchback. They discovered his body in parking lot under a slot with a giant "R" on it, of all things. Many people had "deformities"/"infermaties" at this time and no other characters are given "fake ailments".
If you observe Alexander`s body language at that moment (he leans back distancing himself from the host) he is clearly saying: "those are not my opinions or beliefs but these is a civilized conversation. You are entitled to your opinions but I do not necessarily share them or support them."
I follow Waugh closely watch all his videos and belong to the De Vere society. I also understand the shake -spear Athena stuff but is he saying De Vere didn’t know the man from Stratford who for some years at least worked in the London theatre scene? In which case the surnames were just coincidence ?? Maybe Johnson knew him.
Think of the way the top Soviet apparatchiks lived; so little could be said without reservation. That’s the 20th century! The Elizabethan Era was just as laced with No Go’s & Ideological Landmines.
Not sure if my comment sent or flew off into the ethers but I was saying that AW and I sit on opposite sides of the boat, but are pulling in the same direction re the Authorship Question, and the fact Will Shakspur definitely didn’t write the plays. However, Francis Bacon was eulogised (and mentioned in life) as a great poet - see Manes Verulaiamina for starters. He also had the same money problems and there were many who ‘knew’ and left clues that he led the Scriptorium. It can create further misinformation when an unsuspecting public hang on to every word from someone, simply because they sound authoritative and come from a literary family. A better way - the middle way - is to present all the information and let people decide for themselves. My book presents the overall picture of what they were up to, whether De Vere, Bacon, Marlowe or whoever, and includes number symbolism, code , cipher etc. I’m not trying to sell my book, rather to sell another broader viewpoint. The Secret Work of an Age: Piercing the Veil. Just out on that big bookstore you mentioned! Amazon. Recommended by Masons even though I’m not one! It’s not true that one can’t know their secrets.
In the parish register he was Hamnet, but he was named for Shakespeare’s friend Hamnet Sadler, who was also known as Hamlet in many legal documents, including in Shakespeare’s own will. The names wear basically spoken the same in the Warwickshire dialect.
William Shakspere of Stratford named his son Hamnet. William Shakespeare named his character Hamlet. The man from Stratford never spelled his name SHAKESPEARE; the poet who hyphenated his name Shake-speare cannot be linked to Stratford without the jumping through of elaborate hoops combined with more than just a touch of circular logic.
@@vetstadiumastroturf5756 Elaborate loops? Such as the fact that spelling was not solidified at the time? Hardly an elaborate loop at all. People spelled their own names differently at different times. Spelling wasn't standardised.
@@ashcrossOh yes, everyone knows spelling wasn't yet solidified, but that doesn't give you the right to call hoops "loops", nor to completely ignore the point that your fellow poster made...that had little to do with spelling and more to do with "elaborate hoops" that are, one supposes leapt through to justify our Wool dealer as the Real dealer.
Interesting, what are your thoughts on other famous authors not writing their own work though? In particular, I am think of famous women writers like Austen, the Brontë sisters and George Elliot - mainly because education wasn't regarded as something that women required in those days (so acquiring those kinds of writing skills seems out of place) and also the fact that women weren't really in the workplace during those times.
It's not hard to imagine that they were taught at home. I mean, the Brontës had three girls in the home before the first son came along so the father - who was a rector and so obviously literate - would have taught them and in a parsonage in rural Yorkshire, even moderately intelligent girls would have picked up literacy quickly and soon shared stories from their imagination and written them down. The first four girls even attended school. Jane Austen's father was also a rector. She was educated at home until she was 10, at which point she was sent to boarding school. George Eliot (born: Mary Anne Evans) was also educated at a school. I mean, it was the 19thC, not the Dark Ages! Seriously. You need to inform yourself on the history of school education in England and what people did before then. As far back as the Reformation and the invention of the Printing press (15th/16thC) it was universally seen as vital (in Europe) for people (male and female) to learn to read so that they could read the Bible for themselves. Even low income homes had one book and it was always the Bible. Why do you think we still have HUNDREDS of phrases we use in everyday life that originated in the King James Bible? Another question: Have you been around children aged 3 and above? I live overseas and I once taught a boy (who was already a little bilingual) English, initially just conversation because when I started, he was 3 and could neither read nor write. In the months before his 5th birthday, his parents gave him easy kids' books to help him read. One day after the two-week Christmas break, I returned to find him reading and from that moment, it wasn't long (a matter of months) until he was reading quickly and easily. I mean his parents didn't allow him screen time then and he's an only child so he had plenty of time. Can you imagine how quickly an average intelligent child picked up the ability to read back then when they had so few distractions??
Claire Cross in her 1966 edition of "The Puritan Earl" (p.45) states that "... publishing controversial works in his own name little became a well-born knight". It wasn't the 'done thing'.
Maybe so, but Shakespeare's works were the epitome of establishment. Do you think the Lord Chamberlain (Elizabeth's cousin and closest advisor) or King James would have tolerated politically dangerous plays being performed by their acting companies?q
Wow, he really opened up here. I knew all this conspiracy stuff from around 2010, but Alexander just stuck to Shakespeare/De Vere and Elizabethan politics when I watched his videos... maybe all the COVID nonsense along with a sense of mortality gave him impetus to be more frank on his conspiratorial worldview... and it turns out we shared that same view for a long time. God bless you, Alexander
4:43 That mathematics teacher wasn’t up to [substance taken up the nose instead smoking a cigarette - YT doesn’t like the word]. The proof of (-1)x(-1) = 1 is extremely simple. Here’s a laboured version to make the steps clear. 0 = 0 x 0 = ( 1 + (-1)) x ( 1 + (-1)) = 1 x 1 + 1 x (-1) + (-1) x 1 + (-1) x (-1) = 1 + (-1) + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) = 0 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) = (-1) + (-1) x (-1) Adding 1 to both sides gives 1 + 0 = 1 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) I.e. 1 = 0 + (-1) x (-1) = (-1) x (-1) QED, as they say. The algebraic properties of the integers used here are the distributive laws, a(b+c) = ab+ac and (b+c)a = ba+ca, and the properties of the additive and multiplicative identities, 0 and 1 respectively; namely 0+n = n+0 = n and 1 x n = n x 1 = n for all n. In the more general case, (-1) x (-1) = 1 holds true in any (so-called) ring with a multiplicative identity. For further info see, for example, the classic ‘A Survey of Modern Algebra’ by Garrett Birkhoff and Saunders Mac Lane. By the way, note that a proof should follow directly from the axioms set down for whatever system is under investigation and will be wholly independent of whether or not those axioms apply in any “practical” case. A “practical” proof, if it is worth anything beyond being a mere heuristic, is not mathematics, and as such is no proof at all.
Alexander Waugh died aged 60, his father Auberon died at 62 and Evelyn Waugh was also 62. Different causes, maybe but a terrible coincidence. Alexander Waugh had a son aged 26 who must be concerned. My knowledge is confined to family longevity
Shake-Speare the spear shaker was Athena. But Athena was Britannia - the coin symbolism is the same and goes back to the Roman era of Britain. In which case, Shakes-Speare was Britannia - the nation. So the true author (Oxford) was writing for the nation. Which is true, because Oxford was being paid £1,000 a year by Queen Elizabeth to write these plays, for the nation. R
Toby and James have done a recent edition - but only focusing on "Culture Corner". I think they are just doing it monthly now. It's just going to be that though, because of Toby's refusal to see the bigger picture and he still believes it all "incompetence".
Yes the deception does indeed go back to the biblical era. Read about the deceptions that covered up the true historical Jesus. “Je.sus, K.ing of Ed.dessa” R
"Cryptic" and/or "It's complicated" is the Go-To cop-out and excuse for all "Modern Academics". Not only does it insult the audience, but they admit their own inability to convey complex information others, as per their "Profession" as a "Professor". Run away!
Does it even matter who wrote the literature attributed to Shakespeare. You can spend years of your life trying to prove that someone else wrote the plays etc. But what if I said to you that God wrote the Shakespearian text. What do I mean by that? I maintain, that truly great art comes from divine inspiration. The artist is a mere conduit for what is received. Yes, he or she will gain a sort of earthly immortality as a result but if we fail to recognise the true source we profit little from the reading.
But that's exactly what Alex says DeVere held to be true, in his various proofs of his theory. Something you would know if you were not so one dimensional.
See what you're saying and am aware of this concept however while his Knights of the Helmet may well have had some point of inflection on the dynamic Bacon himself was far too busy with his own tome's to have take this ll on in his dynamic life. Really not his style from what I can see. Certainly his hand in setting up the Rosecrucian society in America is of great interest as are his other endeavours. Just don't see a handle to crank the pump of posterity for Sir Francis.@@secallen
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I often thought that Alexander Waugh was an interesting guy, but after watching this video, which has has shed so much more light on his thought processes, I now find him quite fascinating.
A great man. A light and champion. Alexander Waugh, "may flights of angels sing thee to thy rest". RIP X
Abso - blooming- lutely, Katherine. 🙏
I could listen to Alexander Waugh for hours.....days.....a lifetime.
But of course he can't speak that long!
Such a wonderful soul, a man of great depth. A great loss to our world. Our loss, heavens gain.
What a sad reminiscence, now since Alexander died in these late July summer days of 2024. One of the most vivid spirits!!
🙏 yes God bless the dude. we are all still living in the dark ages 5:55 or there abouts ☝️ this all .clicks with my own studies. on music and nature.. what a brilliant man. R.I.P AW 🙏
What a fascinating interview. I'm a huge admirer of Alexander's grandfather, one of the best authors in the English language. So to hear Alexander talk with such passion and eloquence about the authorship of Shakespeare's plays, and such topics as secrecy and official lies, just blew my mind. I cannot thank you enough James for this and everything you have done especially in the last few years.
Great discussion. Alexander Waugh is a wonderful thinker and commentator. His presentations are remarkable and so much more worthy than anything offered in mainstream. I do hope very much his condition is improved. (=Ivermectin)
If only these new big C discoveries would be absorbed into accepted medicine. Would save many lives. 🥲
Thanks for posting on RUclips James.
What a fascinating, wonderful and quintessentially English guest.
Thank you, Gentlemen. A splendid discourse. I worked as Deputy head of Sound at The Royal Shakespeare Company, Barbican Theatre, London for 16 years. It was widely known that the pen belonged to Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. I worked closely with Chief Voice Coach, Cicely (Ciss) Berry. Ciss would catch my eye in the Green Room; bribe me with a cigarette and cup of tea. We would go to the Recording Room and hunt through mountains of quarter inch tape, cassette and CD to find her target dialect. I would then copy to short cassettes for Cicely to work with her required actors. Ciss was (I think she passed in 2018) an absolute Queen....of course I should say Princess 🤭. She was a force to be reckoned with. When she was on site in London she would conduct the daily pre show Vocal Warm-Ups in the Main House Auditorium. Ciss was so loved and respected that heavy duty Lead Actors would especially turn up. This was an incredible boost to Company Moral and the confidence building of young Actors. Ciss was down to earth. She had a profound feeling for the delivery of 'The Iambic Pentameter'. She knew ALL the cuss words and would not hesitate to deliver them with consummate aplomb when the situation required. Ciss had the twinkle of a ballet dancer and the audio lexicon of a seasoned Choreographer. The real deal. God bless you, Cicely Berry. ♥️
Dear Cellulitis I've never seen a "ballet dancers twinkle" but only touched one in the dark. It was wonderful!!
Best guest EVER! Love Alexander Waugh deciphering Edward de Vere's cryptic clues revealing the real Bard's secrets ;)
it was a team of writers, incl de Vere and Bacon and the Spear Shakers, the same as most written or visual productions today being a product of many unnamed contributors
@@rickacton7540 Knights of the Helmets
@@mariadange06 and ben jonson, and marlowe, etc etc
RIP Alexander Waugh - a brilliant mind (30 Dec 1963 - 22 July 2024) 🙏🌠
🙏 Amen
The knowledge and literature stands alone for anyone to discover but it has been expropriated by the middle classes and denied to ordinary people by funneling them into state education. The best schools that teach it are reserved for them. What is worse is that we used to have a plethora of small independent book shops where people could discover interesting books outside the education system. Now they are gone and very few people read. We have entered an age of illiteracy that is ideal for the exercise of tyranny. Thank goodness for the growth in home schooling encouraging individuality and independent thinking. A small ray of hope amidst the descending darkness.
Brilliant podcast!
Alexander is fascinating .
Absolutely fascinating, engaging and thoughtful discussion. I had the opportunity to meet and interview Auberon Waugh...and Alexander has the admirable and extraordinary best aspects of his father and grandfather.
Excellent conversation. Thankyou James.
My college Shakespeare professor refused to discuss questions of authorship when students attempted to ask... sometimes he'd get visibly angry. I found out from one of his grad students a year or so later that he was indeed a skeptic, but was incredibly fearful of his peers, who were hardcore Stratfordians. Anecdotal, to be sure, but I think it speaks to the intense power that the Traditionalists have over those who doubt the official story.
When was this?
No, it says something about the strength of authentic scholarship! There is no reasonable doubt whatsoever that Shakespeare didn't write Shakespeare.
@@joecurran2811 The early 1990s.
@@cooperwesley1536we live in an age of deception .. we are sill in the dark ages.. telling the truth will get us in trouble. speaking personally 😳
7:14 a marvellous turn of phrase “playing us around, a bit”
😂 yes Alex has a great sense of humour .. so did the earl of oxford. those nasa guys. the globe theatre of course is in the round.. a ring. Isssiah 40 22 .
This is an outstanding interview! Alexander Waugh is every bit as interesting and original as his father and grandfather.
One of your best yet . More historical conspiracy please .
Thanks for this really enjoyed it & very fascinating. My late dad was a huge Waugh family fan especially Auberon he would have loved this. Thank you
Hello James. Thank you for another video cast.
Not even 10 minutes in, and oh how I would have loved to have been in this conversation with you gentlemen, absolutely love it.
Yes, a great loss. He opened my eyes and showed the lies never end.....
☝️🤎🙏 sadly missed. a great man. turned the lights on in an otherwise dark age. God bless him and his family 🙏
Wonderfully rich discourse. A moments pleasure separating the madness beyond. Thank you both.
Always a Treat listening to Alexander Waugh
Thanks James, really enjoyed this.
Very sad to hear of Waugh’s death on 22/7/24 from prostate cancer his work on De Vere is priceless
He died? 😢 That's so sad
How did we get where we are today? Nominalism, and how it can be used for the benefit of oligarchs
Also, Evelyn Waugh was absolutely right to be disillusioned with the RCC after Vatican II. Shows the sincerity and integrity of the man
Evelyn Waugh should never have put his faith in man/an institution of man.
The Bible is very clear that we are to have faith (trust) in Christ alone.
Rest in peace Alexander 🙏🏿
This was a fantastic interview and so interesting as I thought Shakespeare was Sir Francis Bacon, how wrong were those who thought it true!
Alexander’s a true genius. I listened to this twice on the Delingpod as there’s sooo much information.
Me too! Then I sent a link to this interview far and wide!
Waugh is so wrong about Shakespeare Authorship.
@@tvfun32 - because..?
Yes !! Tom Bree's book 'Cosmos in Stone ' is a must get !!👍😊🌟
Thank you for the title 😊😊
Super!
Alexander Waugh was waking up to the Truth Movement reality boldly and directly. He was understanding how the reality of of the Elizabethan era must be related to the current world to be properly understood. They may have taken him out for this reason. But he set an example of what must be done. We must all join the battle and tactically move forward as best we can.
Having watched a number of Alexander's videos beforehand, it is refreshing to hear him condense so many of his earlier significant points, while bringing out others besides. One's responses are obviously personal, but, for my part, I find I can relate most readily to Alexander's conclusions concerning the Shakespeare Authorship Question, and much else. FWIW I have an empathy also with the experience of Hank Whittemore, in his endeavour to fully understand the Sonnets. As bizarre as it may seem, I had my own damascene moment when addressing myself to the subject of the Whitechapel Murders, wherein one detects the subtle hand of Freemasonry, again manifest in a veil of letters and numbers. As Alexander recounts, it is far from obvious, but once seen it cannot be ignored.
Truth is stranger than fiction and the fiction associating Freemasonic members and the murders in Stepney is a wishful fiction.
Masonry has plenty of interesting and sordid associations with individuals like Oscar Wilde and Aleister Crowley not to mention Joseph Smith and his plagiarism of masonic lore to create his own religion. There have been so many corruptions of the Lodge system and masonry like that of "Gods Banker" & P2 that it's difficult for outsiders sometimes to see that corrupt individuals and corporations have used the guise of masonry to shield & disguise their own malevolent aims. Take the weeds out of the garden and you get some pretty wonderful harvests.
Wonderful.
Alexander Waugh is the very type and strain of obstinant and plain speaking gentleman that makes the pretenders pale in comparison. I will forever sorely miss his great and humorous presentations, that put him for a time (in the most duplicitous of times) at the head of the illustrious Oxfordian phalanx that laid waste to the arguments of those who refuse to even consider our collected history might now and then be or have been false and misleading, not to mention deliberately obfiscated for profit or for slavish orthodoxy. Vale Alexander.
Nice to listen to Alexander summarize what he explains in his videos, which I did not find boring by the way. And to touch on way more. Thank you.
This subject is incredible
Sorry to hear about the passing of Alexander Waugh, the greatest expert on Shakespeare, to my knowledge.
🙏 Amen , he was the greatest ☝️
Great pod.
Only just started, and not subbed to your channel; but will be now! Many thanks for this. I came to know Waugh’s work through my many years of research into the occult, theology and so forth. He’s an amazing researcher and a great narrator, absolutely love his work. Got yourself a new subscriber for sure, thanks again!
I watched your conversation twice today, as I was doing chores-----I wanted to remember more of the details------thank you! I am posting to you, a URL of a New York Times article, talking about foods which fight cancer. At the top of the list (for me) are artichokes and dandelion roots, which cause apoptosis. (And you understand the Greek.) (I actually studied Greek when I was in college--it makes the world more understandable.) Even if you were to drink off the shelf dandelion root tea, it would help. I have a chronic blood cancer and my numbers are almost normal----I have never had to take chemo. I just want you to be healthy! About 8 months ago, I was watching German lessons (I worked in Germany) and RUclips suggested your talk about the triple tau and such. It has changed my life. I watch a lot of your talks and the SOF---I am really happy to find out about Edward de Vere, as I have always felt uncomfortable about the Shaksper guy. A friend of mine recently asked me to read "Will in the World.'' When I was finished, I said that we would still have to agree to disagree, because the book was written in the subjunctive. A friend of mine, who has a background in philosophy, told me that since the Chinese traditional medicine, such as dandelion root and magnolia bark--have been used successfully for thousands of years, makes them proved empirically----almost as good as the scientific method. And all medicine was like this, before the discovery of germ theory. Here is the NYT article---------- www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/well/eat/food-diet-cancer-risk.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Bk0.FDkI.X3z1lrYqFTqa&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
2 fine fellows.
And so say all of us
He made astonishing discoveries that amaze me still. So gutted. There's no one like him.
I never heard him mention it, but I believe he was a direct descendant of De Vere through his grandmother, a Herbert.
Really is such a sad loss, and he had so many exciting things in the pipe line, like you Eddie, I really am gutted and very sad.
Very much. Also very suspicious. Unjected. See his Instagrim message. Umbrella tip envenomed bumped in a corridor, train station? Hadn't heard any EDV ancestry. Forward any intel. Cheers.
Rest in peace.
Amen 🙏
I wised up to the Earl of Oxford through Looney and Charlton Ogburn, Jr. and have never looked back.
Great interview. I wish Alexander hadn't diverted James from his question right at the end, it is an important and interesting point......
Very much enjoyed your interview with Alexander . I've been following him for a long time & always look forward to hearing from him. Something is bothering me though James, is Alexander OK? I thought he looked unwell, not like himself at all. Hope he's OK🙏
*@Mountain Hare:* Like you I'm a long time admirer of Alexander Waugh. In fact I often put his channel on a loop and listen during the overnight hours. I felt the same thing when I saw him here. He looks unwell and I've very concerned.
Yes glad I'm not the only one to notice. I did a double take when I saw him, compared to a year ago he looks so thin...I pray he is OK , such a gifted and lovely man.@@ginawiggles918
He recently announced he has been undergoing chemo. A true bummer, to put it mildly
My rule of thumb is to never believe conspiracy theories unless they are more probably true than the alternative. They do, sometimes, exist. Almost always, they do not.
we have to do our own research.. and it isn't easy with all the censorship going on. digital book burning .. suppression of information.. ☝️ there are a bunch of very popular opportunists and grifters putting out false info. along with think tanks videos.. manufacturing peoples opinions.. it's literally psychological warfare trying to find the truth.. avoid anything popular 🙏
Wonderful! Indeed, It is fun to play the numbers! In Psalm 46, the King James Translators chose to place the word “shake” 46 words down from the top and “spear” 46 words from the bottom. More importantly, they put the key to spiritual growth in verse 10: “Be still, and know that I am God”. I can best put this in a poem: All numbers, be they even, odd, / When well-considered lead to God / The humble mind thus uses will / To know His graces and be still.
Check out the Geneva Bible. The translators of the King James didn't invent Psalm 46.
RIP. Work on Shakspere was INVALUABLE!
Rest in Peace AW. James, when did you record this interview. All yt says is "1 year ago."
Is Alexander well? He looks unnaturally aged, although his brilliant mind is as sharp as ever.
He's only 59, that's younger than Gary Lineker.
He's in the midst of chemotherapy for prostate cancer which has spread unfortunately
@@CulinarySpy The government needs to stop blocking GcMAF treatment
He had prostate cancer and has just passed away from it
A good companion book to "The Secret History of the World" by Mark Booth is "Philosophy between the Lines" by Arthur Melzer, a history of esoteric writing.
Alexander Waugh is an amazing man.
Now with some coad spelling. I thoroughly enjoyed this even though I’m definitely not the literary type. Well done and thank you!
Just one thing. I’m very puzzled that you, James, think that Newton’s Principia is junk on a par with the current klighmατε ßolloχ. His laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation stand today. Admittedly they need to be modified when it comes to the very small (quantum mechanics) and the very large/massive and at very high speeds (special and general relativity) but one only has to work with them to see for oneself that how stunningly acute they are at explaining so much about the physical world and so incredibly accurately. But doing so requires a certain level of mathematics without which no understanding is possible. However, that acquaintance can be readily had by anyone prepared to make the effort and is no bar in the way you intimate. In particular Newton’s works are about as far from the utter lighs, schtt and ßolloχ of the κoммιε-ßstard klighmaτε phayckers that it is possible to get.
By the way, Newton couched pretty much everything in the Principia in geometric terms even though equivalent constructions are more readily apparent when done using his calculus. But mathematicians and natural philosophers (physicists) were familiar in 1687 with geometry and Newton had not published his calculus. He wouldn’t have published anything if Edmund Halley hadn’t pushed him to do so. But when he did, he did so with his intended readership and their capabilities in mind.
If you want an authoritative view on the Principia I suggest the book by I Bernard Cohen, ‘The Principia: The Authoritative Translation: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’. About £15 for the 600-page paperback.
For what it’s worth I agree with almost everything you say about almost everything.
All the very best to you.
ispirato - cerciamo sempre la verità
Poca verità nell'ultimi 10 minuti d conversazione
I find it interesting that these guys agree on the Shakespeare authorship issue, namely that there is no evidence whatsoever that the man from Stratford wrote the plays and poems attributed to him, and yet they have no such issues with the existence of God.
God is all around us bro. it's what binds the universe together. it's in everyone and everything.. we see the patterns in nature. and in the poetry.. "enlightenment" ☝️ is what's the renesance was all about. then "they" threw us back into the dark ages.. and this is where we find ourselves in this modern day and age.. still in the dark ages.. 😳
Second best bed could be a reference to the second best Ed, Edmund spencer being the number one. Ed de vere been the second.
good comedy!
No dinosaurs?
😂😂😂
P.S. I really liked "The Loved One."
Yes, Richard III was a hunchback. They discovered his body in parking lot under a slot with a giant "R" on it, of all things. Many people had "deformities"/"infermaties" at this time and no other characters are given "fake ailments".
Big fan of Alexander. It’s a sad to see him in this forum with someone who doesn’t believe in evolution, the moon landing, and dinosaurs.
On the plus side it places Alexander's intellect in 'stark relief', as the saying goes.
If you observe Alexander`s body language at that moment (he leans back distancing himself from the host) he is clearly saying: "those are not my opinions or beliefs but these is a civilized conversation. You are entitled to your opinions but I do not necessarily share them or support them."
Exactly. I almost lost respect for this man in the last 10 minutes of the conversation. So sad...
I follow Waugh closely watch all his videos and belong to the De Vere society. I also understand the shake -spear Athena stuff but is he saying De Vere didn’t know the man from Stratford who for some years at least worked in the London theatre scene? In which case the surnames were just coincidence ?? Maybe Johnson knew him.
Think of the way the top Soviet apparatchiks lived; so little could be said without reservation. That’s the 20th century! The Elizabethan Era was just as laced with No Go’s & Ideological Landmines.
Not sure if my comment sent or flew off into the ethers but I was saying that AW and I sit on opposite sides of the boat, but are pulling in the same direction re the Authorship Question, and the fact Will Shakspur definitely didn’t write the plays. However, Francis Bacon was eulogised (and mentioned in life) as a great poet - see Manes Verulaiamina for starters. He also had the same money problems and there were many who ‘knew’ and left clues that he led the Scriptorium.
It can create further misinformation when an unsuspecting public hang on to every word from someone, simply because they sound authoritative and come from a literary family. A better way - the middle way - is to present all the information and let people decide for themselves. My book presents the overall picture of what they were up to, whether De Vere, Bacon, Marlowe or whoever, and includes number symbolism, code , cipher etc. I’m not trying to sell my book, rather to sell another broader viewpoint. The Secret Work of an Age: Piercing the Veil. Just out on that big bookstore you mentioned! Amazon. Recommended by Masons even though I’m not one! It’s not true that one can’t know their secrets.
Didn’t William Shakespeare call his son Hamlet or Hamnet (spelling was all over the place then as everyone knows)?
In the parish register he was Hamnet, but he was named for Shakespeare’s friend Hamnet Sadler, who was also known as Hamlet in many legal documents, including in Shakespeare’s own will. The names wear basically spoken the same in the Warwickshire dialect.
William Shakspere of Stratford named his son Hamnet.
William Shakespeare named his character Hamlet.
The man from Stratford never spelled his name SHAKESPEARE; the poet who hyphenated his name Shake-speare cannot be linked to Stratford without the jumping through of elaborate hoops combined with more than just a touch of circular logic.
@@vetstadiumastroturf5756 Elaborate loops? Such as the fact that spelling was not solidified at the time? Hardly an elaborate loop at all. People spelled their own names differently at different times. Spelling wasn't standardised.
@@ashcrossOh yes, everyone knows spelling wasn't yet solidified, but that doesn't give you the right to call hoops "loops", nor to completely ignore the point that your fellow poster made...that had little to do with spelling and more to do with "elaborate hoops" that are, one supposes leapt through to justify our Wool dealer as the Real dealer.
@@benc8834 so you accept that spelling wasn't solidified but still believe that the variant spellings say something? That's an odd kind of logic!
Interesting, what are your thoughts on other famous authors not writing their own work though? In particular, I am think of famous women writers like Austen, the Brontë sisters and George Elliot - mainly because education wasn't regarded as something that women required in those days (so acquiring those kinds of writing skills seems out of place) and also the fact that women weren't really in the workplace during those times.
Barrie Appleby . The Beano
It's not hard to imagine that they were taught at home.
I mean, the Brontës had three girls in the home before the first son came along so the father - who was a rector and so obviously literate - would have taught them and in a parsonage in rural Yorkshire, even moderately intelligent girls would have picked up literacy quickly and soon shared stories from their imagination and written them down.
The first four girls even attended school.
Jane Austen's father was also a rector. She was educated at home until she was 10, at which point she was sent to boarding school.
George Eliot (born: Mary Anne Evans) was also educated at a school.
I mean, it was the 19thC, not the Dark Ages!
Seriously. You need to inform yourself on the history of school education in England and what people did before then.
As far back as the Reformation and the invention of the Printing press (15th/16thC) it was universally seen as vital (in Europe) for people (male and female) to learn to read so that they could read the Bible for themselves.
Even low income homes had one book and it was always the Bible.
Why do you think we still have HUNDREDS of phrases we use in everyday life that originated in the King James Bible?
Another question: Have you been around children aged 3 and above?
I live overseas and I once taught a boy (who was already a little bilingual) English, initially just conversation because when I started, he was 3 and could neither read nor write.
In the months before his 5th birthday, his parents gave him easy kids' books to help him read.
One day after the two-week Christmas break, I returned to find him reading and from that moment, it wasn't long (a matter of months) until he was reading quickly and easily.
I mean his parents didn't allow him screen time then and he's an only child so he had plenty of time.
Can you imagine how quickly an average intelligent child picked up the ability to read back then when they had so few distractions??
Claire Cross in her 1966 edition of "The Puritan Earl" (p.45) states that "... publishing controversial works in his own name little became a well-born knight". It wasn't the 'done thing'.
Maybe so, but Shakespeare's works were the epitome of establishment. Do you think the Lord Chamberlain (Elizabeth's cousin and closest advisor) or King James would have tolerated politically dangerous plays being performed by their acting companies?q
Wow, he really opened up here. I knew all this conspiracy stuff from around 2010, but Alexander just stuck to Shakespeare/De Vere and Elizabethan politics when I watched his videos... maybe all the COVID nonsense along with a sense of mortality gave him impetus to be more frank on his conspiratorial worldview... and it turns out we shared that same view for a long time. God bless you, Alexander
4:43 That mathematics teacher wasn’t up to [substance taken up the nose instead smoking a cigarette - YT doesn’t like the word]. The proof of (-1)x(-1) = 1 is extremely simple. Here’s a laboured version to make the steps clear.
0 = 0 x 0 = ( 1 + (-1)) x ( 1 + (-1))
= 1 x 1 + 1 x (-1) + (-1) x 1 + (-1) x (-1)
= 1 + (-1) + (-1) + (-1) x (-1)
= 0 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1)
= (-1) + (-1) x (-1)
Adding 1 to both sides gives
1 + 0 = 1 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1)
I.e. 1 = 0 + (-1) x (-1) = (-1) x (-1)
QED, as they say.
The algebraic properties of the integers used here are the distributive laws, a(b+c) = ab+ac and (b+c)a = ba+ca, and the properties of the additive and multiplicative identities, 0 and 1 respectively; namely 0+n = n+0 = n and 1 x n = n x 1 = n for all n.
In the more general case, (-1) x (-1) = 1 holds true in any (so-called) ring with a multiplicative identity.
For further info see, for example, the classic ‘A Survey of Modern Algebra’ by Garrett Birkhoff and Saunders Mac Lane.
By the way, note that a proof should follow directly from the axioms set down for whatever system is under investigation and will be wholly independent of whether or not those axioms apply in any “practical” case. A “practical” proof, if it is worth anything beyond being a mere heuristic, is not mathematics, and as such is no proof at all.
Alexander Waugh died aged 60, his father Auberon died at 62 and Evelyn Waugh was also 62. Different causes, maybe but a terrible coincidence. Alexander Waugh had a son aged 26 who must be concerned. My knowledge is confined to family longevity
Shake-Speare the spear shaker was Athena.
But Athena was Britannia - the coin symbolism is the same and goes back to the Roman era of Britain. In which case, Shakes-Speare was Britannia - the nation.
So the true author (Oxford) was writing for the nation. Which is true, because Oxford was being paid £1,000 a year by Queen Elizabeth to write these plays, for the nation.
R
We need London Calling with James and Lozza.
Good call . Me thinks James and Toby are now a busted flush
Toby and James have done a recent edition - but only focusing on "Culture Corner". I think they are just doing it monthly now. It's just going to be that though, because of Toby's refusal to see the bigger picture and he still believes it all "incompetence".
Hello. It’s impossible to comment here with any meaningful content.
Haven't you already done so?
@@martinroberts9792 Now I have. Earlier attempts were wiped.
Interesting: an innocuous comment I made here a couple of weeks ago seems to have disappeared too. @@orsoncart802
Minerva = "Pallas" Athena = Spear Shaking Athena = "Shakespeare"
Yes the deception does indeed go back to the biblical era.
Read about the deceptions that covered up the true historical Jesus.
“Je.sus, K.ing of Ed.dessa”
R
1:15:25. Oh…ahem….did not have the ‘evolution, the moon landing, dinosaurs, and WWII’ were all lies on my Shakespeare authorship question bingo card.
For such an erudite man, why did he keep saying 'who' instead of 'whom' ? Has it gone out of fashion? Lovely interview, however.
too much American cultural influence of late it would seem. Blame Roger Stritmatter
Adrenochrome 🤦♀
"Cryptic" and/or "It's complicated" is the Go-To cop-out and excuse for all "Modern Academics". Not only does it insult the audience, but they admit their own inability to convey complex information others, as per their "Profession" as a "Professor". Run away!
Does it even matter who wrote the literature attributed to Shakespeare. You can spend years of your life trying to prove that someone else wrote the plays etc. But what if I said to you that God wrote the Shakespearian text. What do I mean by that? I maintain, that truly great art comes from divine inspiration. The artist is a mere conduit for what is received. Yes, he or she will gain a sort of earthly immortality as a result but if we fail to recognise the true source we profit little from the reading.
"if we fail to recognise the true source we profit little from the reading." But surely one has first to identify the appropriate artist?
But that's exactly what Alex says DeVere held to be true, in his various proofs of his theory. Something you would know if you were not so one dimensional.
Shakespeare no. The bible yes? Jesus! That's loopy.
the bible is also loaded with code and allegory.. triple meanings ..
Mi5 TV
Great talk but the Francis Bacon Telegram group hypothesis is more convincing.
Fit for the bottom of the Bird cage!
Bacon a Genius! Just not the Author of the works of Shakespeare.
@@peckerwood6078 not the author, but was more of an admin on the crowdsourcing project.
See what you're saying and am aware of this concept however while his Knights of the Helmet may well have had some point of inflection on the dynamic Bacon himself was far too busy with his own tome's to have take this ll on in his dynamic life.
Really not his style from what I can see. Certainly his hand in setting up the Rosecrucian society in America is of great interest as are his other endeavours. Just don't see a handle to crank the pump of posterity for Sir Francis.@@secallen
Completely bonkers but RIP.
1-3-9