@@hockeypnc3 Because it wasn't the end result that they wanted. To hear Tom Lange continuously say, this is harmless, this happens all the time, etc. I guess he doesn't realize that contaminating evidence shouldn't be something that HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
40:35 That doesn't look like Fung holding the bag at all! Maybe it was and the angle is bad, but seriously....just like earlier in one of the episodes, they interviewed Nicole's sister, who has changed her mannerisms and appearance so much as well as her voice that I suspected she was a stand-in. Her face shape and forehead were off. BUT in all honesty, I don't look anything like I did in the 1990's, so...(shrugs)
Exactly. It was a clear deflection by the defense. The blood evidence came out in the civil trial. Had more honest jurors and not racially motivated jerks.
The LAPD screwed this up. How can they be upset? The Jury has no choice but vote not guilty. This might be the LAPDs first time being held accountable. You could tell from the crime scene video they had an arrogance.
@@lovablevietboy If you look at the history of the LAPD, they have killed many innocent people without getting in trouble. This sowed distrust from the populace and the defense team concentrated on showing the jury how corrupt the police were.
Scheck did an amazing job exposing the complete litany of errors made in handling the evidence by the LAPD, allowing instance after instance of contamination. He put their incompetence on full display in a way nobody was prepared for. Lange’s arrogance displays this. This might have been the first time his department was actually held accountable for their actions and asked to explain what they did and why under oath to everyone, and he’s outraged by that simple fact alone. Your justification can’t be “well everything’s contaminated.” That makes it worse. They made mistake after mistake and the only defense is “well we make these kind of mistakes all the time.” Well then that’s an indictment on the behavior of the detectives, that doesn’t make it okay. “We do it all the time” is never a defense for this sort of situation.
Yea but the logic here doesn’t add up if your on a jury an see the defense contradict the evidence so much how can anybody lie and say they would still believe oj was guilty I wouldn’t not with all those contradictory elements if you put a evidence collector on stand an he’s down playing his own mistakes like it was nothing I would absolutely say oj was framed as well then when you play records of a raycist cop on that very same team an you say he was framed anybodt would put not guilty no way I’m going to believe he did it after seeing a raycist cop an a incompetent evidence collector being exposed for sloppy work
Hmm. I think that's more a comment of the bureaucracy of the stae of California and the LAPD and the fact that everyone only wants to avoid rocking the boat and they just do what they are asked to do and nothing more. That's the reason that everyone who works for the state in California only cares about keeping their jobs andnothing else. Look at DA Gil Garcetti. If he really wanted to sent a murderer to jail it would've been different. He was praying for an acquittal. No more Rodney King riots.
It’s pretty telling that every lawyer in this is either whining or gloating about their own or others’ performances and not one is like “we believe justice was served.”
I heard seven of the 15 or so lawyers say justice was served, this was the correct verdict because their client was innocent. They were everywhere doing interviews and pressers. Mr. Cochran, F. Lee Bailey, Barry schect, Mr. Douglas, Shawn Holley, Alan Dershowitz…
Fung should've said Scheck was racist treating an Asian man like this. I can guarantee you that if Fung was named Tyrone Jackson, Scheck wouldn't have EVER attacked him that way.
@@paulaharrisbaca4851 it’s racist to point out that he did a horrible job and violated many, many explicitly written rules, protocol and procedures? That’s called I’m white and I say so. Doesn’t have to make sense at all. You know damn well Black people are buried by this penal system every day. Anyone named Tyrone is getting harsher sentences for lesser offenses than any other person from a different racial background. How dare you even utter such nonsense. Every Black male defense attorney in this country has been mistaken for the defendant multiple times by deputies and court staff because they’re so used to the defendant being the only Black person in the courtroom. Just speak your mind. If you “feel” the defendant is guilty, it’s ok to fabricate and destroy evidence to get them convicted. It’s pure happenstance that you only get these deep feelings of guilt when the defendant is Black.
Nah, it was a con job by the defense who knew their audience. Far more was right with their case than wrong. Just a con job, using the race card tactic that works so well.
O.J's dream team were so much better than the prosecution. It just goes to show what money can buy, had he been a poor man he would not have stood a chance. His attorneys were able to poke so many holes in the case. I've always thought he probably did it, but never been completely convinced.
In a case where the main suspect isn't a rich celebrity, if they find just his blood on the crime scene, the suspect will be in a prison for the rest of his life. Although in OJ'S case they had much more evidence, OJ had much more money than an average citizen so he got away with two brutal murders.
It's just weird, because with the dream team, you would have thought that all attorneys everywhere should all work to the same standard. A normal attorney should still have been able to poke holes in this case. It's a shame all people regardless of wealth don't get the same quality of attorney
@@kanyebreast6072you’d think that, wouldn’t you? Court appointed attorneys have so many cases, you’re lucky if they work 20 hrs on your case. Money buys you undivided attention to your case, not better lawyers, so to speak. You can afford better expert witnesses that will lie on the stand. It’s called testilying. You get attorneys that have expertise in a certain field, like Schleck. DNA is his bread and butter, and he knows that most of what he said was not exactly right. The jurors were non the wiser.
@@pommiebears Go back and watch Peter Neufeld cross of Dr Robin Cotton ,she testified,none of the blood she tested had any contaminant's.The blood was placed on the swatches, under laboratory conditions.
This had nothing to do with the defense team. The prosecution was absolutely horrible. Even with all that bs that defense tried with poking holes into the actual evidence.. The blood was all collected BEFORE OJ GOT BACK lol. You'd have to be an absolute moron or racist to believe anything the defense said.. Which we now know.. They were racist. Because we now know OJ owned those Bruno Magli shoes that were a size 12 that was at the crime scene and those jurors STILL say they stick by their decision lol
@woodyhayes7402 but the blood was found at the scene. His blood found locked in his car + o the outside of his car after he left for Chicago? Timeline doesn't make sense 😕
@TomLeach-dd8cl Simpson flew back to LA the next day got handcuffed & they collected his blood. Detective Vannater takes Simpsons blood all the way back to the crime scene for some reason. Instead of booking it right there at SID
I certainly hope that those on here…with an actual brain…understand that even with mixed DNA samples, ORENTHAL was proven to be present at both locations.
We can’t determine that and certainly any non biased reasonable person can conclude there’s enough doubt that it could have been planted or crossed mixed in the lab.
Present doesn’t mean guilty it just means suspected like me being in a car during a robbery in a suspect but did I commit the robbery probably but you have to prove I was involved in the crime let’s say my brother drives me to rob a bank an I didn’t get out I’m in the passenger seat I’m there but I had nothing to do with it I was just sitting in the passenger an not taking part in the crime an he drives me home an the cops come an locks me up for sitting there in the car as a suspect
Mr. Simpson could not have possibly been at the scene, because he was tucked up in bed with me at the time. And he was very good between the sheets. Very loving and very giving.
20:35 .....OJ's "well financed" team??? As if the Los Angeles prosecutors were doing "Hot dog fund raisers". Only a billionaire could outspend the prosecution.
Or a rich murderer like O J Simpson. Any moron could figure out he did the killings. Only an idiot would conclude otherwise. Only a rich violent criminal would have gotten away with it too, like O J Simpson. Rational people know he did it.
Recently a serial killer in Florida Prison confessed to murdering Nicole and Ron Goldman, so basically Not only OJ was innocent but also he spent 4 million dollars and DA spent over 10 million so 14 million been waisted and OJ life was destroyed who can fix his reputation now , ?
But BEING a newer criminalist Mazzola was certainly being very careful, since she had much more to lose than Fung. Don’t impugn testimony nor expertise based on the notion she was a “newbie”. Shame on the defense and any that think she didn’t do the job properly. This isn’t a 6 week online course people. She was taught, trained and rode along to observe. 🙄🙄🙄 GOD BLESS THE BLUE!
If samples of blood were contaminated as the defense said then how did the blood come up as ojs blood answer it was not contaminated the defense is lieing again
They had oj blood on the first day He gave them a sample when he went and gave a statement Easy And VanAtter held onto his blood Overnight And dropped it off too Fung while he was at Nicole's 😂 But nothing is suspect here Goofy
@@chocolatetownforever7537O J blood was planted , Detective Vanatter was walking around with OJ blood in his pocket for 24 hours, why didn't he checked it in to evidence? I know why, because he wanted to plant some of it.
The mistakes and sloppiness was always happening. This was the first time where real lawyers and experts were able to shine light on it. The money and the publicity was too much to pass up for Barry Scheck and his desire to further forensic science, even if it meant a guilty man going free.
I love Barry scheck cross examination of Mr Fung Barry is a shark he tears Fung a new asshole with the planted blood drops at Bundy! I love when he shows the picture of gate and says where is it mr.fung !? 🤣🤣😂😂a vicious deathblow 2 the prosecution
@@chocolatetownforever7537 The entire prosecution was so cocky they forgot the errors there own teammates made in collecting evidence and the defense did what they were paid to do poke holes in the evidence an they did that along with exposing curropt police how can anybody sit here an say a jury should still convict after all those contradictory statements made by police an the evidence collectors if I’m in a jury an you tell me that the dna was collected carelessly and there’s a raycist police officer in that case an the suspect is blk how can you still say guilty the defense was spectacular
Ever heard of Barry's innocence project? He tears apart sham investigations for a living. He was masterful. I don't know what you saw. Im glad he gets wrongfully convicted people out of prison instead of putting them in there. He's a caring and compassionate man of integrity
The dna is irrelevant if blood was planted. Furhman talks about doing it all the time-ON TAPE! let me guess, this is the one case he was a choir boy in? Please…
@@stacie4170 The different stages of deterioration proves that OJs blood on the scene was nowhere near as degraded as the victims’ blood left outside that night. No possible way they were deposited at the same time.
Lang allows a lot of latitude for the police. I wonder if he's that forgiving when a suspect makes such minor mistakes. What a hypocrite this guy is...
The entire prosecution was so cocky they forgot the errors there own teammates made in collecting evidence and the defense did what they were paid to do poke holes in the evidence an they did that along with exposing curropt police how can anybody sit here an say a jury should still convict after all those contradictory statements made by police an the evidence collectors if I’m in a jury an you tell me that the dna was collected carelessly and there’s a raycist police officer in that case an the suspect is blk how can you still say guilty the defense was spectacular
In almost every interview too, right? He has this “I can’t believe how stupid the defense is,” and “this is how it should’ve been done correctly…” keep in mind him and Vanatter’s interrogation of OJ was laughable. They had him right there… could’ve asked Him anything they wanted. So stupid. Whatever though. OJ played the prosecution like a game of football 😂😂😂
To all those that say, "well regardless of some mistakes" he should have been found guilty, I ask, "would you want a family member of yours to be convicted on this type of evidence?"
I quit watching this trial when Dennis Fung was harrassed on the witness stand. No criminalist is going to be perfect. The crime scene was extremely bloody. It's impossible to be perfect.
If I were Vanneter and after collecting OJ’s blood day after murders, I’d immediately handed it to the evidence department. Don’t care if it was out of sequence, but a suspects blood would have never left that building.
I love the way they kept saying that just because OJ was a celebrity this case was handled like any other murder. Yet they turn around and make a big deal about the criminalist not being the most seasoned. You don't get to have it both ways.
In my head, it was F. Lee Bailey, not Barry Scheck, who tore into Dennis Fung. Blame this on my listening to the Dana Carvey bit hundreds of times. "Mr. Fung, on the day you handled the bloody glove, did you shampoo your hair? Answer the question, Mr. Fung, if that's your real name. Did you rinse and repeat? So there you were, not rinsing and repeating, even though your bottle of Pert Plus explicitly directs you to rinse and repeat. You chose to ignore it, didn't you, Mr. Fung? What else did you ignore? "After you shampooed only once, let the record show, did you... cream rinse your hair? So there you were, handling important forensic evidence with dry, split ends. YOU MAKE ME SICK. You're a disgrace to this judicial system."
You know, Fung was a government employee. He just did his job and nothing else. It's not his fault, it's the whole attitude of most government employees, especially in California. You just do your job and that's it. Nothing more. The "Dream Team" were being paid handsomely to win the case. Who is more motivated?
A respons to officer Lang, you are not in a position to make mistakes. You are not getting paid for making mistakes. And you guys made a lot of mistakes. Even if he killed them, because of your stupid mistakes killers walk away. Get that straight.
42:51 Fung gave an answer that he thought they wanted to hear and to make him look good, not his own opinion of whether or not it was ok to look at a piece of evidence that could become contaminated....some how.
@@kepler240 indeed, actually Fung was a decent guy who made several costly / critical mistakes,!I also believe that although he was a veteran investigator and a supervisor, he made several costly mistakes that the perfectionist Barry Scheck easily keyed in on! Scheck was the 3rd best lawyer on the Defenses side...only Bailey & Cocorahn was a little bit more efficient overall! However, Scheck was an incredible lawyer and gained so much respect merely due to this trial of the century! No wonder that trial cost OJ so much money, they saved OJs life.
@@daviddavis3389 When money is no object, justice tends to lean in your favor when you have the right people. They said the Fuhrman tapes alone costed OJ 200 grand.
The defense’s argument is that a drug cartel showed up at Nicole’s house bc she has a friend who does coke and for some reason k!!!ed her and Ron and then the entire LA PD decided, after years of coddling OJ and not arresting him for serious DV incidents, to then frame him for the murd£r 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It’s too bad the prosecution didn’t anticipate the trickery of the defense attorneys during cross examinations nor did they prep their witnesses for the “gotcha” questions.
35:25 wait. What is the point of this line of questioning? ‘Are you involved in a conspiracy?’ What kind of weird question is that? They’re hardly gonna say ‘well actually, yes! Yes I was! Me and these other 3 guys were absolutely going to lie and plant evidence. Uh, is this a problem?’
@@williebrown2463 I always taught the jury was dumb to not convict him and I still do but with this kind of movie cross examination,and glove don't fit ..it's understandable why they didn't..wrong but understandable
Question if OJ jump the fence and hit into the ac unit ? Why would there be blood drops at the entrance of the drive way Where did he entree his house after hitting the ac and making the sounds Kato heard
If it was a screw up by the police in terms of timins, you still cannot erase Ron and Nicoles blood in Simpson's Bronco, the blood on OJ's socks and his shoe print and other material left in tge crime scene.
It was planted by furhman. Everyone know Furhman said I saw Them. The 2 gloves a the crime scene. He took 1. Put it into a plastic bag. Took it to OJ and pretended he found it there. Lol. Furhman, the racist cop was the #1 reason The jury didn't convict oj. But no one mentions the dirty detective. Lol
Tom Lange is still defending the incompetence of his dept til this day. It’s sad he can’t see or doesn’t want to see just how dumb they handled this case.
You know one thing I can say that I didn’t understand 12:44 was the fact that OJ had that big ass house with a garage and could’ve parked inside the gate. Why would he park his own truck that full of blood outside of his property to easily be spotted stand out and look into I would never understand that part he could’ve easily hidden the truck or called someone like AJ COWLINGS his best friend to come get it and get it detailed or park it somewhere else because I’m pretty sure he told him everything I really do believe he would have called you or just not greatly left the damn truck that you committed a murder in out on the damn street and this makes no sense to me and I know you are having a adrenaline rest. You are skipping logical thinking and facts because you are in fight or flight mode but I mean damn and why in the hell did he need to go around the backside of the bungalows anyways why couldn’t he just watch his ass straight inside, what was he doing back there to have dropped that glove just seems like a weird ass spot. Someone said something about him. Happy thing but why the hell did he need to hop his own fence? It’s his house. He could’ve opened the gate and walked straight in. everyone was inside who was going to see him? The limo guy was not there yet.
Lang has no choice his book with co conspirators Vanatter was a flip flop just like the rest of the characters in this court tv series; "who done it? It's just unbelievable how these police officer and investigators handled this case taking blood evidence back and forth to different crime scene. They should have known better than that, but that's standard practice, but this time court tv justice put the entire law enforcement agencies in America under the microscope. If it's this bad in LA California, just imagine elsewhere? In the end there was no Justice for Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman who were the victims of a horrific attack. In the end the LA District Attorney's Office made OJ Simpson look like he was the victim of a police coverup in their sloppy handling of this case right down to coughing up a lung Ms Clark to Dummy Darden who believed right up to the end that he was part of the prosecution team and not just window dressing for the jury.
@@qalba3016 Alot more,they had to borrow money from the surrounding countie's for OJs' prosecution.Example holding the aircraft from his trip Chicago to search it costs' $7 million .It was stripped to metal.
@@qalba3016 OJ spent $25 million.He had a lot of friends,they rented a 16 bedroom house in Beverly hills for the out of town personnell,like Bailey and other experts.
Welp, that’s not OJ’s fault 🤷🏽♀️ Chris Darden was a man CHILD! And the DREAM TEAM DID THEIR JOB! Rather brilliantly done actually! Watching this for the hundredth time
You're wrong. And one has NOTHING to do with the other. Hung up over OJ? No, what we're hung up on is Nicole and Ron who were slaughtered and their killer walked free. That is what this video is about, right? Or are you just going to bring up every incident that has blacks and whites involved? How about losing the race baiting and stick to the story.
Zimmerman was being beaten to death and he shot his gun once resulting in the death of the perpetrator. Getting away with self-defense is not the same as getting away with killing two unarmed, innocent people in cold blood.
Defense attorneys aren’t interested in their client’s innocence or guilt they get paid to get their client acquitted PERIID! I’ll bet OJ told his Dream Team how he brutally carried this out. Doesn’t matter though. I would’ve loved to been a fly on the wall when he described everything he did and them coming up with a a strategy to get him acquitted.
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the Defense had put the dog that stepped in the blood at the crime scene on the stand in order to show contamination of the crime scene to avoid having OJs history as a physically abusive husband be focused on and the only person who had motive, means and opportunity to commit the murders.
Damn , Peter and Barry really destroyed the prosecution case , I never saw the whole cross examination of fung , know i Know why there was dought on oj being the murder but I still he did do it .
Some folks don’t understand what cross contamination means😂 Dude basically it means transfer of dna and trace evidence from one thing to another accidentally.. It doesn’t just mean it’s contaminated 😂🤣
Wasn't all 3 peoples DNA found in multiple locations (bundy house, whatever the other house is called idc, and oj's car)? How is all 3 people's blood gonna come up in every one of those locations? The criminalogists/whoever tf just happened to mix all 3 blood samples together for every single one of these locations? I find that hard to believe.
@@kself94 And it would be if in those samples weren’t the mixture of the preservative used to keep blood from clotting. That was the give away. Plus, there was less blood in the vial. Ferman the lead detective was asked directly on the witness stand , did you plant evidence at the crime scene ?” Instead of him saying no, he pleaded the 5th. If I knew I didn’t do something I would ‘ve said NO and not pleaded the 5th
@integrity1293 Ehh, maybe you're right. Things get really murky in this trial when you're talking about the DNA evidence. I've always thought it was much more likely that Fuhrman or whoever planted at least some of it than there just being accidental cross contamination at all those locations due to incompetence/mishandling. It's really frustrating how badly both the police and prosecution botched this case since that mf was so obviously guilty.
I happened to be out of work during this trial and pretty much watched the entire thing. I was so mad at the corruption of the LA PD ( think Mark Furman) that by the end I wanted OJ to get off just to see them suffer. However, the Defence, in this case, was brilliant. We'd never seen a " Dream Team quite like this before and it was indeed fascinating to view. Considering the "foul up's of the PD it is easy to see how the Jury could have reasonable doubt.
@@W.Khairi I thought he said when told over the phone in Chicago that Nocole was dead he had a glass in his hand and crushed it. I could have just heard that as a rumor. I believe either he or his son did it.
Simpson's blood was found at the crime scene, Simpson's blood was found mixed with Nicole Brown's blood on his socks in Simpson Rockingham House, Simpson's blood was found mixed with Ron Goldman's blood in Simpson's Ford Bronco... despite all this, a murder walked free...
@@tfa8 3ml of Simpson's blood sample went mysteriously missing. The so-called " trail of blood was mostly specks of blood. The socks were there, then they have a video in which there were no socks..Detectives were carrying around the evidence to and from crime scenes when it should have been taken to the lab. Suspicious.
Fluff and stuff everythinking but the blood evidence that should put anyone in prison. No one deserves to be put thru 9 months of being squestered. All the lawyers from keft to right took too many months.
It is quite obvious that some people are still emotionally wounded by the OJ Simpson trial verdict. They need to get over it. In the court room, it is not about whether a person is guilty or not guilty; it is often about who presents the best case in the eyes and opinion of the jury. For the defense lawyers and prosecutors, it is not an emotional matter. Their stance on the defendant becomes their legal position. The OJ defense team did their job perfectly; they were not there to help the prosecution in any way. Their job was to get their client off and they did just that. A mountain of evidence do not always win cases. Furthermore, the average person finds scientific analysis snoring boring. So quite often, it comes down to who can perform and tell the best narrative believed by the jury, public opinion in this instance is irrelevant. In the Rodney King case, there was overwhelming video evidence of police brutality. Yet an all white jury found the police officers not guilty. That jury bought into the prosecution case. In a wider context, people are often convicted and jailed for things they did not do. The justice system is not perfect. Furthermore, when getting justice or "fair' trial depends on how much money a person has, it shows that we are a long way from having equal justice for all.
The police and prosecution crying like they don't know the job of defense lawyers. There job is to put as much doubt in the prosecutions case as possible. There job is not to help them to convict their client.
Yes, the correct procedures weren't followed in collecting evidence, but the result still showed OJ so in the end, the wrong collection of evidence didn't affect the result showing someone
@@kanyebreast6072 They used OJs' blood and framed him.The most incriminating blood was found on the Bundy back gate three weeks after the murders,after the property was washed down.
@@kanyebreast6072 The blood in the Bronco was found in August,all 7/10th of a drop.The blood on those mysterious socks ,found 12 wk's later.The blood had soaked through to the third side ,while OJ had them on.
41:56 Tom Lange admits all of his crime scenes have been contaminated.
I was surprised he was that brutally honest about that too. But at least he did put it out there. He admitted it.
Which is normal.
Lange was so salty that his teammates and himself were awful at their jobs.
🤣🤣😆
@@bford5899 Your assessment is SOOOOO wrong.
well said
@@ameliareaganwright2758 and why is that?
@@hockeypnc3 Because it wasn't the end result that they wanted. To hear Tom Lange continuously say, this is harmless, this happens all the time, etc. I guess he doesn't realize that contaminating evidence shouldn't be something that HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
They lit Fung up like the holiday season
Chinese New York lol
Like the Castellano hit outside Sparks Steakhouse
LOL
40:35 That doesn't look like Fung holding the bag at all! Maybe it was and the angle is bad, but seriously....just like earlier in one of the episodes, they interviewed Nicole's sister, who has changed her mannerisms and appearance so much as well as her voice that I suspected she was a stand-in. Her face shape and forehead were off. BUT in all honesty, I don't look anything like I did in the 1990's, so...(shrugs)
@paulaharrisbaca4851 This is dumb to say, he was the Criminalist 😂. Of course it was him! 😂😂😂😂
Seems like everyone but oj was put on trial. What an absolute circus!?
That's called a good defense and that's what a good defense attorney is supposed to do
They miss the dog 😂
Exactly. It was a clear deflection by the defense. The blood evidence came out in the civil trial. Had more honest jurors and not racially motivated jerks.
The LAPD screwed this up. How can they be upset? The Jury has no choice but vote not guilty. This might be the LAPDs first time being held accountable. You could tell from the crime scene video they had an arrogance.
The LAPD learned the meaning of "karma."
If they want to be upset... they should be upset at themselves
Held accountable? But the death of both innocent victims are loss at what?
@@lovablevietboy If you look at the history of the LAPD, they have killed many innocent people without getting in trouble.
This sowed distrust from the populace and the defense team concentrated on showing the jury how corrupt the police were.
@@lovablevietboy You are missing the point THIS IS A SYSTEMIC ISSUE,
what oj did and the victims are just the causalities of America. its Karma
Scheck did an amazing job exposing the complete litany of errors made in handling the evidence by the LAPD, allowing instance after instance of contamination. He put their incompetence on full display in a way nobody was prepared for.
Lange’s arrogance displays this. This might have been the first time his department was actually held accountable for their actions and asked to explain what they did and why under oath to everyone, and he’s outraged by that simple fact alone. Your justification can’t be “well everything’s contaminated.” That makes it worse. They made mistake after mistake and the only defense is “well we make these kind of mistakes all the time.” Well then that’s an indictment on the behavior of the detectives, that doesn’t make it okay. “We do it all the time” is never a defense for this sort of situation.
Yea but the logic here doesn’t add up if your on a jury an see the defense contradict the evidence so much how can anybody lie and say they would still believe oj was guilty I wouldn’t not with all those contradictory elements if you put a evidence collector on stand an he’s down playing his own mistakes like it was nothing I would absolutely say oj was framed as well then when you play records of a raycist cop on that very same team an you say he was framed anybodt would put not guilty no way I’m going to believe he did it after seeing a raycist cop an a incompetent evidence collector being exposed for sloppy work
Hmm. I think that's more a comment of the bureaucracy of the stae of California and the LAPD and the fact that everyone only wants to avoid rocking the boat and they just do what they are asked to do and nothing more. That's the reason that everyone who works for the state in California only cares about keeping their jobs andnothing else. Look at DA Gil Garcetti. If he really wanted to sent a murderer to jail it would've been different. He was praying for an acquittal. No more Rodney King riots.
Yes but OJ still did it
It’s pretty telling that every lawyer in this is either whining or gloating about their own or others’ performances and not one is like “we believe justice was served.”
Very true
@@mostlyvoid.partiallystars because justice wasn’t served. But it has been now. He’s burning in hell awaiting his soulmate, Casey Anthony.
I heard seven of the 15 or so lawyers say justice was served, this was the correct verdict because their client was innocent. They were everywhere doing interviews and pressers. Mr. Cochran, F. Lee Bailey, Barry schect, Mr. Douglas, Shawn Holley, Alan Dershowitz…
Barry SCHECK had Fung looking like Swiss cheese 🧀
Fung should've said Scheck was racist treating an Asian man like this. I can guarantee you that if Fung was named Tyrone Jackson, Scheck wouldn't have EVER attacked him that way.
Fung was as useful to convicting OJ as a pile of dirt 💩
@@paulaharrisbaca4851 it’s racist to point out that he did a horrible job and violated many, many explicitly written rules, protocol and procedures? That’s called I’m white and I say so. Doesn’t have to make sense at all. You know damn well Black people are buried by this penal system every day. Anyone named Tyrone is getting harsher sentences for lesser offenses than any other person from a different racial background. How dare you even utter such nonsense. Every Black male defense attorney in this country has been mistaken for the defendant multiple times by deputies and court staff because they’re so used to the defendant being the only Black person in the courtroom. Just speak your mind. If you “feel” the defendant is guilty, it’s ok to fabricate and destroy evidence to get them convicted. It’s pure happenstance that you only get these deep feelings of guilt when the defendant is Black.
This whole case was one BIG screw up by the police in every which way possible
@DOA V 2.0 Man please lay off the weed. This early in the morning
Nah, it was a con job by the defense who knew their audience. Far more was right with their case than wrong. Just a con job, using the race card tactic that works so well.
…You mean one big screw up by the JURY………
@@trashtvinternational The jury was brilliant,they knew a frame up when they see one.
@@philipwilliams1754 jury was stupid and illiterate.... so ignorant ughhh
O.J's dream team were so much better than the prosecution. It just goes to show what money can buy, had he been a poor man he would not have stood a chance. His attorneys were able to poke so many holes in the case. I've always thought he probably did it, but never been completely convinced.
In a case where the main suspect isn't a rich celebrity, if they find just his blood on the crime scene, the suspect will be in a prison for the rest of his life.
Although in OJ'S case they had much more evidence, OJ had much more money than an average citizen so he got away with two brutal murders.
It's just weird, because with the dream team, you would have thought that all attorneys everywhere should all work to the same standard. A normal attorney should still have been able to poke holes in this case. It's a shame all people regardless of wealth don't get the same quality of attorney
@@kanyebreast6072you’d think that, wouldn’t you? Court appointed attorneys have so many cases, you’re lucky if they work 20 hrs on your case. Money buys you undivided attention to your case, not better lawyers, so to speak. You can afford better expert witnesses that will lie on the stand. It’s called testilying. You get attorneys that have expertise in a certain field, like Schleck. DNA is his bread and butter, and he knows that most of what he said was not exactly right. The jurors were non the wiser.
@@pommiebears Go back and watch Peter Neufeld cross of Dr Robin Cotton ,she testified,none of the blood she tested had any contaminant's.The blood was placed on the swatches, under laboratory conditions.
This had nothing to do with the defense team. The prosecution was absolutely horrible.
Even with all that bs that defense tried with poking holes into the actual evidence..
The blood was all collected BEFORE OJ GOT BACK lol.
You'd have to be an absolute moron or racist to believe anything the defense said.. Which we now know.. They were racist.
Because we now know OJ owned those Bruno Magli shoes that were a size 12 that was at the crime scene and those jurors STILL say they stick by their decision lol
Can someone please explain how the blood was planted when oj Simpson didn't give blood samples till after the crime had happened?
The blood in the Bronco wasn't discovered until after the trial had already started, and OJ had given blood samples.
Detectives did a blood drawl from Simpson day after murders after first interview.
@woodyhayes7402 but the blood was found at the scene. His blood found locked in his car + o the outside of his car after he left for Chicago? Timeline doesn't make sense 😕
@TomLeach-dd8cl Simpson flew back to LA the next day got handcuffed & they collected his blood. Detective Vannater takes Simpsons blood all the way back to the crime scene for some reason. Instead of booking it right there at SID
Exactly…the blood was there, observed and noted while oj was in Chicago
I certainly hope that those on here…with an actual brain…understand that even with mixed DNA samples, ORENTHAL was proven to be present at both locations.
We can’t determine that and certainly any non biased reasonable person can conclude there’s enough doubt that it could have been planted or crossed mixed in the lab.
"present" at both locations does not mean Guilty!
Present doesn’t mean guilty it just means suspected like me being in a car during a robbery in a suspect but did I commit the robbery probably but you have to prove I was involved in the crime let’s say my brother drives me to rob a bank an I didn’t get out I’m in the passenger seat I’m there but I had nothing to do with it I was just sitting in the passenger an not taking part in the crime an he drives me home an the cops come an locks me up for sitting there in the car as a suspect
With another half of a brain, there’s no logical way your theory is faultless.
Mr. Simpson could not have possibly been at the scene, because he was tucked up in bed with me at the time. And he was very good between the sheets. Very loving and very giving.
20:35 .....OJ's "well financed" team??? As if the Los Angeles prosecutors were doing "Hot dog fund raisers". Only a billionaire could outspend the prosecution.
Or a rich murderer like O J Simpson. Any moron could figure out he did the killings. Only an idiot would conclude otherwise. Only a rich violent criminal would have gotten away with it too, like O J Simpson. Rational people know he did it.
Recently a serial killer in Florida Prison confessed to murdering Nicole and Ron Goldman, so basically Not only OJ was innocent but also he spent 4 million dollars and DA spent over 10 million so 14 million been waisted and OJ life was destroyed who can fix his reputation now , ?
So if he wasn't rich ,and could afford paying so many defence lawyers, he would be in prison till today
@@katarzynamariamuszynska2811 ARE YOU ACTUALLY WATCHING THE VIDEOS??
@@Jeromemayle yes
But BEING a newer criminalist Mazzola was certainly being very careful, since she had much more to lose than Fung. Don’t impugn testimony nor expertise based on the notion she was a “newbie”. Shame on the defense and any that think she didn’t do the job properly. This isn’t a 6 week online course people. She was taught, trained and rode along to observe. 🙄🙄🙄 GOD BLESS THE BLUE!
If samples of blood were contaminated as the defense said then how did the blood come up as ojs blood answer it was not contaminated the defense is lieing again
Exactly. Its not magically becoming OJ Simpsons DNA.
They had oj blood on the first day
He gave them a sample when he went and gave a statement
Easy
And VanAtter held onto his blood
Overnight
And dropped it off too Fung while he was at Nicole's
😂
But nothing is suspect here
Goofy
@@chocolatetownforever7537O J blood was planted , Detective Vanatter was walking around with OJ blood in his pocket for 24 hours, why didn't he checked it in to evidence? I know why, because he wanted to plant some of it.
Hey. Did you actually WATCH THE TRIAL???
Your biases are showing
@@williebrown2463 yes and I’m correct
The mistakes and sloppiness was always happening. This was the first time where real lawyers and experts were able to shine light on it. The money and the publicity was too much to pass up for Barry Scheck and his desire to further forensic science, even if it meant a guilty man going free.
Barry has given interviews where he states that he believes oj is innocent
@@NomadChristian did he really? The lawyers on the dream team usually like to dance around that question.
interesting comment
I love Barry scheck cross examination of Mr Fung Barry is a shark he tears Fung a new asshole with the planted blood drops at Bundy! I love when he shows the picture of gate and says where is it mr.fung !? 🤣🤣😂😂a vicious deathblow 2 the prosecution
Id bet my life on OJs guilt, but youre right about Scheck. Hes a GREAT attorney, and is brilliant.
And rich
You’re dumb if you believe that 😂💀
Wow it was very difficult.
@@chocolatetownforever7537
The entire prosecution was so cocky they forgot the errors there own teammates made in collecting evidence and the defense did what they were paid to do poke holes in the evidence an they did that along with exposing curropt police how can anybody sit here an say a jury should still convict after all those contradictory statements made by police an the evidence collectors if I’m in a jury an you tell me that the dna was collected carelessly and there’s a raycist police officer in that case an the suspect is blk how can you still say guilty the defense was spectacular
Love how Barry is now the purveyor of justice. All he cares about is justice - as he gets a double murderer acquitted.
Ever heard of Barry's innocence project? He tears apart sham investigations for a living. He was masterful. I don't know what you saw. Im glad he gets wrongfully convicted people out of prison instead of putting them in there. He's a caring and compassionate man of integrity
Justice isn't about whether a person gets found guilty or not. Justice is when procedures are followed so that jurors can decide without a doubt.
@@aeroAdvocate this is poetic but 100 percent wrong.
None of the incriminating blood was found on the day of the murders.
@@philipwilliams17543 weeks later,,, Nothing to suspicious about that right? These racist are gonna say he’s guilty with ZERO sustainable evidence
When a mans life hangs in the balance and justice for murder victims is a priority, making huge mistakes and cutting corners isn't "harmless".
“Deterioration of the specimen” does not change the DNA SEQUENCE NOR who it belongs to. Please…
Yes it does you can’t accurately pin something on someone if the dna isn’t properly managed that is reasonable doubt right there
The dna is irrelevant if blood was planted. Furhman talks about doing it all the time-ON TAPE! let me guess, this is the one case he was a choir boy in? Please…
@@stacie4170 The different stages of deterioration proves that OJs blood on the scene was nowhere near as degraded as the victims’ blood left outside that night. No possible way they were deposited at the same time.
@@Ontiming2023Wrong. Contamination doesn’t change one DNA ‘reading’ into someone else’s. Contamination just makes the DNA unreadable/ unmatchable
@@jthejeweler85How was OJ’s blood planted at the scene days before any blood was taken from him?
They ate Fung lunch!
Sure did..
Definitely did!
lol why the profile of that crazy guy
Barry scheck and peter neufeld killed the whole case
Chicken fried fung
Lang allows a lot of latitude for the police. I wonder if he's that forgiving when a suspect makes such minor mistakes. What a hypocrite this guy is...
The entire prosecution was so cocky they forgot the errors there own teammates made in collecting evidence and the defense did what they were paid to do poke holes in the evidence an they did that along with exposing curropt police how can anybody sit here an say a jury should still convict after all those contradictory statements made by police an the evidence collectors if I’m in a jury an you tell me that the dna was collected carelessly and there’s a raycist police officer in that case an the suspect is blk how can you still say guilty the defense was spectacular
In almost every interview too, right?
He has this “I can’t believe how stupid the defense is,” and “this is how it should’ve been done correctly…” keep in mind him and Vanatter’s interrogation of OJ was laughable. They had him right there… could’ve asked
Him anything they wanted. So stupid. Whatever though. OJ played the prosecution like a game of football 😂😂😂
Lang??? How about the entire damned planet thinking how stupid the defense and jury were😂😂
@@Burzurk1987 Appeal to majority fallacy. You didn't say he was wrong though.
@@TheHipHopolypseyour right , it was the lousiest murder case interview I’ve ever heard
I like Detective Tom Lang. He's no nonsense.
Hahahaha, he is full with mistakes 😂 he got paid to make mistakes.
Me too
Lang is a lier
He's been involved in some of the most notorious cases in l.a history including the wonderland murders.
He's a good cop .
He's nothing but nonsense. Total lack of accountability, always excuses and deflections. It's his fault OJ is free
To all those that say, "well regardless of some mistakes" he should have been found guilty, I ask, "would you want a family member of yours to be convicted on this type of evidence?"
I'm with you!!! If the glove doesn't fit you must ACQUIT!!
This only works for yt criminals. The blk ones get manufactured evidence and it's ok.
I quit watching this trial when Dennis Fung was harrassed on the witness stand. No criminalist is going to be perfect. The crime scene was extremely bloody. It's impossible to be perfect.
@aarongilliam3670 nothing is wrong with the collection method , so they compromised the results
@@aarongilliam3670 it doesn't work in there favor that's y
If I were Vanneter and after collecting OJ’s blood day after murders, I’d immediately handed it to the evidence department. Don’t care if it was out of sequence, but a suspects blood would have never left that building.
0:36 Has there been a worse case of domestic terrorism in the United States since the bombing of the Murrow building?
I love the way they kept saying that just because OJ was a celebrity this case was handled like any other murder. Yet they turn around and make a big deal about the criminalist not being the most seasoned. You don't get to have it both ways.
Huh??
I agree
"They"...who??
In my head, it was F. Lee Bailey, not Barry Scheck, who tore into Dennis Fung. Blame this on my listening to the Dana Carvey bit hundreds of times.
"Mr. Fung, on the day you handled the bloody glove, did you shampoo your hair? Answer the question, Mr. Fung, if that's your real name. Did you rinse and repeat? So there you were, not rinsing and repeating, even though your bottle of Pert Plus explicitly directs you to rinse and repeat. You chose to ignore it, didn't you, Mr. Fung? What else did you ignore?
"After you shampooed only once, let the record show, did you... cream rinse your hair? So there you were, handling important forensic evidence with dry, split ends. YOU MAKE ME SICK. You're a disgrace to this judicial system."
You know, Fung was a government employee. He just did his job and nothing else. It's not his fault, it's the whole attitude of most government employees, especially in California. You just do your job and that's it. Nothing more. The "Dream Team" were being paid handsomely to win the case. Who is more motivated?
A respons to officer Lang, you are not in a position to make mistakes. You are not getting paid for making mistakes. And you guys made a lot of mistakes. Even if he killed them, because of your stupid mistakes killers walk away. Get that straight.
Oj is guilty as hell
True. The civil trial proved that with the Bruno Magli shoes. They had better attorneys in that case.
And OJ was mandated to testify and be cross examined in the Civil Case.
How do you know "?? Did you see it"?? Can you describe how it went down"??
Marcia Clark and Chris Darden and the prosecution team looked like young children when Barry scheck tore Fung to pieces. Whooo weee
42:51 Fung gave an answer that he thought they wanted to hear and to make him look good, not his own opinion of whether or not it was ok to look at a piece of evidence that could become contaminated....some how.
Now!, Now!, Now!.....How bout that Mr Fungggg, How bout that?
@@daviddavis3389 Yeah, that was good drama for the jury.
Fung wasn't the best witness for the prosecution, that's for sure.
@@kepler240 indeed, actually Fung was a decent guy who made several costly / critical mistakes,!I also believe that although he was a veteran investigator and a supervisor, he made several costly mistakes that the perfectionist Barry Scheck easily keyed in on! Scheck was the 3rd best lawyer on the Defenses side...only Bailey & Cocorahn was a little bit more efficient overall! However, Scheck was an incredible lawyer and gained so much respect merely due to this trial of the century! No wonder that trial cost OJ so much money, they saved OJs life.
@@daviddavis3389 When money is no object, justice tends to lean in your favor when you have the right people. They said the Fuhrman tapes alone costed OJ 200 grand.
Ito is a terrible judge, he let the defense walk all over him. Dragged it out forever and turned it into a circus.
Things were not FUN for FUNG…
😂😂😂
The defense’s argument is that a drug cartel showed up at Nicole’s house bc she has a friend who does coke and for some reason k!!!ed her and Ron and then the entire LA PD decided, after years of coddling OJ and not arresting him for serious DV incidents, to then frame him for the murd£r 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lange is the detective who took OJ's shoes home overnight
This was happening while I was being born, so interesting
It’s too bad the prosecution didn’t anticipate the trickery of the defense attorneys during cross examinations nor did they prep their witnesses for the “gotcha” questions.
The defense attorneys were varsity and prosecution was JV that’s why they were not prepared
35:25 wait. What is the point of this line of questioning? ‘Are you involved in a conspiracy?’ What kind of weird question is that? They’re hardly gonna say ‘well actually, yes! Yes I was! Me and these other 3 guys were absolutely going to lie and plant evidence. Uh, is this a problem?’
6 some body moved that glove
At 11:55. Barry Scheck in an interview said he believed OJ was innocent so get your facts straight smh
Scheck was brilliant in catching Fung out on all his incompetence. That's what the defence is all about raising reasonable doubt.
🥰
Why is Fred Goldman chiming in on the handling of DNA evidence? Is he an authority on the subject?
No. He just has a big mouth, and a sense of entitlement. He should be angry at the police for screwing up the case by lying and planting evidence.
@@williebrown2463 Agree!
@@williebrown2463stupid. If u have a kid see how u act when they’re murdered by someone with snake attorneys and endless resources
Probably because his son was murdered by orange Simpson and he wants to stab oj and the overpaid snake attorneys
@@williebrown2463 I always taught the jury was dumb to not convict him and I still do but with this kind of movie cross examination,and glove don't fit ..it's understandable why they didn't..wrong but understandable
Every juror and defence team on that trial will have to answer for their actions
Grow up
Lange kept running off at the mouth about what was not important he would not say that if he was on trial
Question if OJ jump the fence and hit into the ac unit ? Why would there be blood drops at the entrance of the drive way
Where did he entree his house after hitting the ac and making the sounds Kato heard
If it was a screw up by the police in terms of timins, you still cannot erase Ron and Nicoles blood in Simpson's Bronco, the blood on OJ's socks and his shoe print and other material left in tge crime scene.
If one blood drop was planted chances are they were all planted
It was planted by furhman. Everyone know Furhman said I saw Them. The 2 gloves a the crime scene. He took 1. Put it into a plastic bag. Took it to OJ and pretended he found it there. Lol. Furhman, the racist cop was the #1 reason The jury didn't convict oj. But no one mentions the dirty detective. Lol
All of that was eviscerated.
Tom Lange is still defending the incompetence of his dept til this day. It’s sad he can’t see or doesn’t want to see just how dumb they handled this case.
Just because they took evidence back to the crime scene for the first time ever you wanna call that suspicious,,, so be it…. -Kim Goldman- Uh What!!!
39:40 simpsons blood
Incompetence at the highest level with these cops
Dream team my eye more like all star team. These lawyers are like the BABE RUTH and Barry bonds and Ted Williams caliber lawyers
Not that the prosecution was going to win anyway, but after Dennis Fung's left the stand, they should've just gave OJ the key to the jail cell.
That"s a feminist opinion
Domestic Violence isn't murder
You know one thing I can say that I didn’t understand 12:44 was the fact that OJ had that big ass house with a garage and could’ve parked inside the gate. Why would he park his own truck that full of blood outside of his property to easily be spotted stand out and look into I would never understand that part he could’ve easily hidden the truck or called someone like AJ COWLINGS his best friend to come get it and get it detailed or park it somewhere else because I’m pretty sure he told him everything I really do believe he would have called you or just not greatly left the damn truck that you committed a murder in out on the damn street and this makes no sense to me and I know you are having a adrenaline rest. You are skipping logical thinking and facts because you are in fight or flight mode but I mean damn and why in the hell did he need to go around the backside of the bungalows anyways why couldn’t he just watch his ass straight inside, what was he doing back there to have dropped that glove just seems like a weird ass spot. Someone said something about him. Happy thing but why the hell did he need to hop his own fence? It’s his house. He could’ve opened the gate and walked straight in. everyone was inside who was going to see him? The limo guy was not there yet.
How funny is it that this guy’s last name is Fung?
34:37
If the Jury selectors had any brains, they would have chosen Italian, Chinese, German and indigenous American Indians for the jury.
What does the Oklahoma bombing have to do with O.J. case? Totaly irrelevant.
Lang has no choice his book with co conspirators Vanatter was a flip flop just like the rest of the characters in this court tv series; "who done it? It's just unbelievable how these police officer and investigators handled this case taking blood evidence back and forth to different crime scene. They should have known better than that, but that's standard practice, but this time court tv justice put the entire law enforcement agencies in America under the microscope. If it's this bad in LA California, just imagine elsewhere? In the end there was no Justice for Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman who were the victims of a horrific attack.
In the end the LA District Attorney's Office made OJ Simpson look like he was the victim of a police coverup in their sloppy handling of this case right down to coughing up a lung Ms Clark to Dummy Darden who believed right up to the end that he was part of the prosecution team and not just window dressing for the jury.
That wasn’t the envelope that they highlighted. That was papers on a clipboard. 🤔🧐
28:29 43:13
😄 the investigators were all thumbs
Lange said car was un secured
None of the blood they tested had any contaminants.Meaning,they were not exposed to the elements.
i wonder if every defense attorney used this tactic after because nearly every crime scene wouldn’t be perfect
WE HAVIN' SOME FUNG NOW!
OJ was framed - he's a hell of a guy, not a murderer. The outcome was correct. Nicole treated him like a doormat.
Fung's mistakes do not prove someone mixed the deceased and OJ's blood onto the glove.
So Chris Darden can’t win a case unless the defendant isn’t well financed or competent defence team. My god does this guy ever stop sucking at life?
His side cost exceeded 10 million dollars
@@qalba3016 Alot more,they had to borrow money from the surrounding countie's for OJs' prosecution.Example holding the aircraft from his trip Chicago to search it costs' $7 million .It was stripped to metal.
@@qalba3016 OJ spent $25 million.He had a lot of friends,they rented a 16 bedroom house in Beverly hills for the out of town personnell,like Bailey and other experts.
Darden recently did an interview,in which he states they were not ready for trial.None of the DNA evidence was done.
Welp, that’s not OJ’s fault 🤷🏽♀️ Chris Darden was a man CHILD! And the DREAM TEAM DID THEIR JOB! Rather brilliantly done actually! Watching this for the hundredth time
Possibility is a match
Disbarred lawyer at 4:13.
Irresponsible is an understatement by the LAPD, watching this now reaffirmed my belief.
A lot of y’all didn’t care and still don’t care that George Zimmerman walked away a free man. Yet, you’re still hung up over OJ. Wonder why? 🤔
You're wrong. And one has NOTHING to do with the other. Hung up over OJ? No, what we're hung up on is Nicole and Ron who were slaughtered and their killer walked free. That is what this video is about, right? Or are you just going to bring up every incident that has blacks and whites involved? How about losing the race baiting and stick to the story.
Zimmerman was being beaten to death and he shot his gun once resulting in the death of the perpetrator. Getting away with self-defense is not the same as getting away with killing two unarmed, innocent people in cold blood.
Amen 🙏
Facts
No comparison. Are you a racist? Never mind…no need to answer.
Oh Fung FU#@ed up...lol 🙃
There should be mandatory iq tests done on potential jurors .
How bout that! Mr fung!
Defense attorneys aren’t interested in their client’s innocence or guilt they get paid to get their client acquitted PERIID! I’ll bet OJ told his Dream Team how he brutally carried this out. Doesn’t matter though. I would’ve loved to been a fly on the wall when he described everything he did and them coming up with a a strategy to get him acquitted.
The Defense didn’t win this Case.. The Prosecution lost it..
Defense was brilliant!!
@@hus390 and lucky
The reporting is blatantly, blatantly biased against the defense . So much for fair and balanced press, huh?
Sad, sad, sad.
They been bias still didn't help the persecutes. Lol
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the Defense had put the dog that stepped in the blood at the crime scene on the stand in order to show
contamination of the crime scene to avoid having OJs history as a physically abusive husband be focused on and the only person who had motive, means and opportunity to commit the murders.
Fung dint know there was previous comparison here mark distinguishes same and rr and lt.
Damn , Peter and Barry really destroyed the prosecution case , I never saw the whole cross examination of fung , know i
Know why there was dought on oj being the murder but I still he did do it .
Some folks don’t understand what cross contamination means😂 Dude basically it means transfer of dna and trace evidence from one thing to another accidentally.. It doesn’t just mean it’s contaminated 😂🤣
That’s not u in the pic
@@Ontiming2023 Yes it is😂🤣 I don’t play games like that. I have a tan but that’s me
Wasn't all 3 peoples DNA found in multiple locations (bundy house, whatever the other house is called idc, and oj's car)? How is all 3 people's blood gonna come up in every one of those locations? The criminalogists/whoever tf just happened to mix all 3 blood samples together for every single one of these locations? I find that hard to believe.
@@kself94 And it would be if in those samples weren’t the mixture of the preservative used to keep blood from clotting. That was the give away. Plus, there was less blood in the vial. Ferman the lead detective was asked directly on the witness stand , did you plant evidence at the crime scene ?” Instead of him saying no, he pleaded the 5th. If I knew I didn’t do something I would ‘ve said NO and not pleaded the 5th
@integrity1293 Ehh, maybe you're right. Things get really murky in this trial when you're talking about the DNA evidence. I've always thought it was much more likely that Fuhrman or whoever planted at least some of it than there just being accidental cross contamination at all those locations due to incompetence/mishandling. It's really frustrating how badly both the police and prosecution botched this case since that mf was so obviously guilty.
I happened to be out of work during this trial and pretty much watched the entire thing. I was so mad at the corruption of the LA PD ( think Mark Furman) that by the end I wanted OJ to get off just to see them suffer. However, the Defence, in this case, was brilliant. We'd never seen a " Dream Team quite like this before and it was indeed fascinating to view. Considering the "foul up's of the PD it is easy to see how the Jury could have reasonable doubt.
He has a cut finger - which he doesnt explain how he got -, His blood is everywhere, And u r saying it was easy, what kind of logic r u utilizing
@@W.Khairi I thought he said when told over the phone in Chicago that Nocole was dead he had a glass in his hand and crushed it. I could have just heard that as a rumor. I believe either he or his son did it.
Simpson's blood was found at the crime scene, Simpson's blood was found mixed with Nicole Brown's blood on his socks in Simpson Rockingham House, Simpson's blood was found mixed with Ron Goldman's blood in Simpson's Ford Bronco...
despite all this, a murder walked free...
@@tfa8 3ml of Simpson's blood sample went mysteriously missing. The so-called " trail of blood was mostly specks of blood. The socks were there, then they have a video in which there were no socks..Detectives were carrying around the evidence to and from crime scenes when it should have been taken to the lab. Suspicious.
So mad that you suspended all rational logic and believed O J wasn't the perp?
LAPD bunch of Jabronis
Fluff and stuff everythinking but the blood evidence that should put anyone in prison.
No one deserves to be put thru 9 months of being squestered. All the lawyers from keft to right took too many months.
Dennis Fong was not prepared and did not prepare.
Huh
Imagine the sh%t they did before cameras 😮
OJs team put the Prosecution on trial. OJs Money has the last word
Glen Rogers did it and admitted to killing them both. And had evidence to prove it
that poor boy Mr. Fung gets turned apart and makes an a** out of himself
It is quite obvious that some people are still emotionally wounded by the OJ Simpson trial verdict. They need to get over it.
In the court room, it is not about whether a person is guilty or not guilty; it is often about who presents the best case in the eyes and opinion of the jury. For the defense lawyers and prosecutors, it is not an emotional matter. Their stance on the defendant becomes their legal position.
The OJ defense team did their job perfectly; they were not there to help the prosecution in any way. Their job was to get their client off and they did just that.
A mountain of evidence do not always win cases. Furthermore, the average person finds scientific analysis snoring boring. So quite often, it comes down to who can perform and tell the best narrative believed by the jury, public opinion in this instance is irrelevant.
In the Rodney King case, there was overwhelming video evidence of police brutality. Yet an all white jury found the police officers not guilty. That jury bought into the prosecution case.
In a wider context, people are often convicted and jailed for things they did not do. The justice system is not perfect.
Furthermore, when getting justice or "fair' trial depends on how much money a person has, it shows that we are a long way from having equal justice for all.
Dennis f look like he falling asleep
Busy
The police and prosecution crying like they don't know the job of defense lawyers. There job is to put as much doubt in the prosecutions case as possible. There job is not to help them to convict their client.
Lange is so dishonest
If the evidence is mishandled how can all these people trust the evidence. Crazy people want him to be guilty just because they won’t someone to blame
Yes, the correct procedures weren't followed in collecting evidence, but the result still showed OJ so in the end, the wrong collection of evidence didn't affect the result showing someone
@@kanyebreast6072 They used OJs' blood and framed him.The most incriminating blood was found on the Bundy back gate three weeks after the murders,after the property was washed down.
@@kanyebreast6072 The blood in the Bronco was found in August,all 7/10th of a drop.The blood on those mysterious socks ,found 12 wk's later.The blood had soaked through to the third side ,while OJ had them on.
@@philipwilliams1754 I didn't know OJ was giving out free blood samples the night of the murders.
This cop is another lier and covers up for all thier unacceptable mistakes