Tricky because you'd have to do so on a light table and make sure that 1. The lighting is perfectly even side to side 2. The camera and lens are perfectly square to the centet of the negative 3. The negative lays flat. So it's a lot more work than a high resolution scanr
Thanks again for this, Darlene!
You are so welcome!
I notice you are working with a scanned negative. Are there instances when a negative photographed with a macro lens would be better?
Tricky because you'd have to do so on a light table and make sure that 1. The lighting is perfectly even side to side 2. The camera and lens are perfectly square to the centet of the negative 3. The negative lays flat.
So it's a lot more work than a high resolution scanr
@@DigitalPhotoMentor Thank you.