Mark did a great job of staying on topic and answering all the general nuclear / uranium questions. I think your listeners Brian, would be well served to get a Part #2 of this interview with a MUCH deeper dive into Energy Fuels, Inc!! Such a great opportunity for investors to have exposure to a leader in both Uranium mining and Rare Earth separation; two areas that the US needs to be more independent from a national security standpoint!!
The percentage of fuel shouldn't be necessarily correlated with danger. Remember, it is more potent, so you need less to power something. Therefore you wouldn't have enough to build a bomb. We are talking about a massive amount of the isotope in order to cause a chain reaction or even a dirty bomb.
Thanks for the feedback guys! You should check out the "Environment" chapter in my new book for more insights... www.amazon.com/What-Should-Do-My-Money/dp/1264857934/ref=sr_1_1
The old economic saying, "It's the grid costs stupid." Clean energy is important. But the biggest problem is getting electricity to the millions and millions of users. The customers. The generation is the small cost and distracts from the main cost. The transmission costs. The biggest economic problem.. The economic equation is 1 to 10. Generator cost only vs generator plus its transmission costs. Construction costs. And with no fossil fuels 1 to 5. 5 times bigger national electrical energy market. The full cost equation is 50 times the cost of the existing national generator plant. All conversations about different nuclear electricity generation and even the distant renewable electricity should include the economic statement, " It's the grid stupid ". The nuclear promoters are cheating and want to monopolise the existing national transmission grid.
The "Engines of Democracy" burn Credibility, real and illusory beliefs, if they can be forced into acceptance by the people who actually vote as a survival requirement, either socially or fiscally, then "By their actions you will know them". Sense-in-common has to be learned and the current curriculum needs constant reiteration overhaul, that is Life.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank U !⚛
Mark did a great job of staying on topic and answering all the general nuclear / uranium questions. I think your listeners Brian, would be well served to get a Part #2 of this interview with a MUCH deeper dive into Energy Fuels, Inc!! Such a great opportunity for investors to have exposure to a leader in both Uranium mining and Rare Earth separation; two areas that the US needs to be more independent from a national security standpoint!!
The percentage of fuel shouldn't be necessarily correlated with danger. Remember, it is more potent, so you need less to power something. Therefore you wouldn't have enough to build a bomb. We are talking about a massive amount of the isotope in order to cause a chain reaction or even a dirty bomb.
Thanks for the feedback guys! You should check out the "Environment" chapter in my new book for more insights... www.amazon.com/What-Should-Do-My-Money/dp/1264857934/ref=sr_1_1
The old economic saying,
"It's the grid costs stupid."
Clean energy is important.
But the biggest problem is getting electricity to the millions and millions of users.
The customers.
The generation is the small cost and distracts from the main cost.
The transmission costs.
The biggest economic problem..
The economic equation is 1 to 10.
Generator cost only vs generator plus its transmission costs. Construction costs.
And with no fossil fuels 1 to 5.
5 times bigger national electrical energy market.
The full cost equation is 50 times the cost of the existing national generator plant.
All conversations about different nuclear electricity generation and even the distant renewable electricity should include the economic statement,
" It's the grid stupid ".
The nuclear promoters are cheating and want to monopolise the existing national transmission grid.
The "Engines of Democracy" burn Credibility, real and illusory beliefs, if they can be forced into acceptance by the people who actually vote as a survival requirement, either socially or fiscally, then "By their actions you will know them". Sense-in-common has to be learned and the current curriculum needs constant reiteration overhaul, that is Life.