Sir, I think it's not clear , When we read sec.421 of crpc ,here clearly mentioned in proviso that Offender shall levied from all fines after completion of prison( for fine). Only Special reason with recording or IPC 357 apply if Prison complete ( fine prison) for unpaid fine.
Agar koi vyakti real main liable na ho us fine ko pay karne ke fir bhi usko fine laga diya gaya hai aur agar wo ek baar fine pay kar de to kya wo fir hamesha ke liye criminal ho jayega
Right sir. Lekin ladkiyonke (daughters) naam per properties hi nahi hoti hai. Law ye bhi keheta (says) hai ki equal coparcenary rights for daugjtets also but what if father and two sons distribute all properties amongst tjemselves? Law makers don't allow to open partitions and decrees which were done on or before year 2005? Daughters are asked to keep quiet indirectly by doing such ammendment sec. 20 while when after equal coparcenary rights for daughters announced in year 2005. If partitions - decrees before year 2005, allowed to open, it will be burden for judiciary. Aarey yar, daughters are burden to you law makers or for judiciary? Thats why you are not allowing to open partitions before year 2004-05? Are you going to overwork beyond working hours daily for that? No know? Then kab hota hai honye do na? When are daughters not burden? She is burden to all since her presence in the womb. Then why law makers are making laws against sex determination? Vaise bhi aab aeise law karke hamme jyeenda maar rahye ho cruelly. Stop saying word ' "burden" or nuidanve for any of the problems of daughters or of any daughter. Sec. 20 ammendment in year 2005 regarding coparcenary rights of daughters not to open old partitions before year2004-05 should be cancelled or else it is as good as cancellation with reciprocal effect of the law made by yourself with such ammendment made which has effect of cancellation of the law made.All are equal before law mister. What does constitution say?.. Equal before law irrespective of religion, caste, sex, etc.... Then why separate ammendments for "daughters" yar? Cancel it, cancel that ammendment made and allow daughters to open old partitions and those coerced and fraudulent decrees which were taken place before year 2004-05. Thats like a good law maker. Thank you! 😊. One of the ammended part of law made in year 2005 during Manmohan SIngh govt. was meant for daughter's rights only for those daughters whose father is live. Then what about that daughter who has lost her father? Why injustice to her?... first of all this daughter has lost father's support. Why no equal rights to her? This is because law makers don't know constitution, what is written in constitution i. e. "All are equal before Law." Later it took 15 years to correct it that too on fine day of 12 th August 2020 on judgement of Supteme court. Then imagine daughter's sufferings to get her own birth rights, her own shelter. Why Article 370 ammended?.. because it was not proper. Now still then for daughters it will take quiet a tuff time to seek her property rights. She is absorbed to serve the family and when no need, neglected or kicked off like that of slavery. No preference for her career is given. So, the Limitation Act should not be an compulsion for her to be counted untill now, atleast untill the date 12 th Aug. 2020.
सर जी नमस्कार जैसा कि आप जानते हैं CRPC125 के केस में पहलेCRPC 421 की कार्यवाही बाद में जेल का प्रावधान है अगर मजिस्ट्रेट सीधे जेल भेज दे तो उनकी शिकायत हाईकोर्ट में की जा सकतीं है
Rajiv dikshit sahi bolte the... Angrez loot te bhi the to kanun banakar 😑😑
To kya kiya jaye apradhiyon ko samaj me chod diya jaye ...
💫✨⭐✨ ये कलयुग है - साहब यहाँँ झूठे को स्वीकार किया जाता है , और सच्चे का शिकार किया जाता है !
💫✨ ( मिलन जी )
Namaste sir Ji dhanyawad 🙏
great.
अगर उसे व्यक्ति के नाम कोई संपत्ति ही ना हो तो फिर कैसे जुर्माना वसूल करोगे 😂
Thanks
Thank you so much sir 😊
🙏🏻🙏🏻💐💐💐
Sir agar koi court ki order ko nai manta oske liye ke punishment he
😊😊
Namaste 🌹sir🙏🌿
Sir after BALLB 👉 UPSC is a good option ?
And sir " how to become a APO " please make a video at this topic......
🙏💐
🙏🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bail bond ki rashi saja ke hishab se tay hoti hai
ipc 1860 section 63-70 fine, levy of fine crpc 421
So, here are not mandatory provision that in all cases we can take fine payment after completion of fine Prison.
Sir, I think it's not clear , When we read sec.421 of crpc ,here clearly mentioned in proviso that Offender shall levied from all fines after completion of prison( for fine).
Only Special reason with recording or IPC 357 apply if Prison complete ( fine prison) for unpaid fine.
LLB bar council me interview me kya puchha jayega sir
Section 8 BNS,2023
Good morning sir
मरने के बाद प्रोपर्टी में से ?? तो जिंदा रहते ही प्रॉपर्टी से क्यों नही ? 😂
सर यह बताऐ,अगर जेल काट लिया तो जुर्माना माफ हो जाना चाहिए। कोई उपचार बताऐ
Sir uski jamin bech kar bhi na bhara gaya to kya hoga
Ye kya baat hua
Fir ye kue likha h ki ek gunah ka ek hi saja ho skta h
Ye to do do saja hogya fir?
Ye convenance ke hisab se law bante h kya?
To pehale hi property se vasool kar lo na.
Jail bhejane ki kya jarurat bachati hai for
Agar koi vyakti real main liable na ho us fine ko pay karne ke fir bhi usko fine laga diya gaya hai aur agar wo ek baar fine pay kar de to kya wo fir hamesha ke liye criminal ho jayega
Agar koi fine pay kar de to kya wo insaan kya hi kahelayega fine laga dene se kya mean hoga us person ke liye
एक राजा था, जो भिकारी बन के आया, किसी ब्राह्मण के घर 😂😂 सोचो क्या होगा उस राजा का हर्ष 😂😂😂..
जब जुर्माना कर की तरह वसूल किया जा सकता था तो जेल क्यों ।
Right sir. Lekin ladkiyonke (daughters) naam per properties hi nahi hoti hai.
Law ye bhi keheta (says) hai ki equal coparcenary rights for daugjtets also but what if father and two sons distribute all properties amongst tjemselves? Law makers don't allow to open partitions and decrees which were done on or before year 2005? Daughters are asked to keep quiet indirectly by doing such ammendment sec. 20 while when after equal coparcenary rights for daughters announced in year 2005. If partitions - decrees before year 2005, allowed to open, it will be burden for judiciary. Aarey yar, daughters are burden to you law makers or for judiciary? Thats why you are not allowing to open partitions before year 2004-05? Are you going to overwork beyond working hours daily for that? No know? Then kab hota hai honye do na? When are daughters not burden? She is burden to all since her presence in the womb. Then why law makers are making laws against sex determination? Vaise bhi aab aeise law karke hamme jyeenda maar rahye ho cruelly. Stop saying word ' "burden" or nuidanve for any of the problems of daughters or of any daughter. Sec. 20 ammendment in year 2005 regarding coparcenary rights of daughters not to open old partitions before year2004-05 should be cancelled or else it is as good as cancellation with reciprocal effect of the law made by yourself with such ammendment made which has effect of cancellation of the law made.All are equal before law mister. What does constitution say?.. Equal before law irrespective of religion, caste, sex, etc.... Then why separate ammendments for "daughters" yar? Cancel it, cancel that ammendment made and allow daughters to open old partitions and those coerced and fraudulent decrees which were taken place before year 2004-05. Thats like a good law maker. Thank you! 😊.
One of the ammended part of law made in year 2005 during Manmohan SIngh govt. was meant for daughter's rights only for those daughters whose father is live. Then what about that daughter who has lost her father? Why injustice to her?... first of all this daughter has lost father's support. Why no equal rights to her? This is because law makers don't know constitution, what is written in constitution i. e. "All are equal before Law."
Later it took 15 years to correct it that too on fine day of 12 th August 2020 on judgement of Supteme court. Then imagine daughter's sufferings to get her own birth rights, her own shelter. Why Article 370 ammended?.. because it was not proper. Now still then for daughters it will take quiet a tuff time to seek her property rights. She is absorbed to serve the family and when no need, neglected or kicked off like that of slavery. No preference for her career is given. So, the Limitation Act should not be an compulsion for her to be counted untill now, atleast untill the date 12 th Aug. 2020.
न्यु क्लास कब से चलेगा पी सी एम जे की
सर जी नमस्कार
जैसा कि आप जानते हैं CRPC125 के केस में पहलेCRPC 421 की कार्यवाही बाद में जेल का प्रावधान है अगर मजिस्ट्रेट सीधे जेल भेज दे तो उनकी शिकायत हाईकोर्ट में की जा सकतीं है
Sir I want to work with you.
Sir ji , ladai ke time jo log phone se vedio bnane lagte hai uska kya pravadhan hai ,,, bataye sir
Ye evidence act m aata hy
Sir aapse kucch der baat karni hai sir aapse kaha hum sampark kar sakte hai please sir bataiye 😢
काफी inhuman h fine ur loan interest,puri life ekdam khaa jaate hain sab,kuch krna padega reasonable
Ye angrezo ka banaya huwa kanoon he zo aaz tak pirchalit he hay meri Badnaseebi
😂😂😂😂 बड़ा भस्याकेर कसनून है
सजा भुगत तो ली जुर्माना ना भरने पर, सेक्शन 70 को सुधारना चाहिए यदि वो सक्षम नहीं हैं तो जुर्माना माफ़ होना चाहिए, जोशी सर
Sir apka contact number milega kya
Good morning sir