Introducing the 2022 Seiko 1968 Diver SLA055 and SLA057

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
  • Introducing the 2022 Seiko 1968 Diver SLA055 and SLA057
    Seiko SLA055 and SLA057 at Exquisite Timepieces:
    www.exquisitet...
    www.exquisitet...
    Contact Exquisite Timepieces at:
    Email - info@exquisitetimepieces.com
    Phone - +1 239-227-2932
    4380 Gulfshore Blvd., N. Suite 800
    Naples, FL 34103
    This video is presented by Exquisite Timepieces, a sponsor and partner of the JustBlueFish Watch Reviews RUclips channel. Partners and sponsors of the channel loan products for review or provide compensation for promoting their brand, but as always the opinions found in the product review are unbiased and authentic.
    #Seiko #SLA055 #SLA057

Комментарии • 125

  • @JustBlueFish
    @JustBlueFish  2 года назад +2

    Presented by Exquisite Timepieces: www.exquisitetimepieces.com

  • @aman803
    @aman803 2 года назад +8

    I picked up the 057. I couldn’t be happier about it. It’s fantastic

  • @martinharrison4245
    @martinharrison4245 2 года назад +13

    I've got a sla 043 , the 62mas with the blue 2nd hand. It's a nice watch but at over 4k , it's expensive for a seiko. Upon closer inspection, it's hard to see how could it be made any better, as it's done so well. The movement should of been regulated though. When you consider that they have used a high quality ever bright steel, a hand assembled movement, zaratsu polishing, beautiful indices and hand set , a gorgeous crystal, limited to 1700 pieces worldwide, then priced them similar to a mass produced omega seamaster 300 with a rubber strap, then maybe their value are justified ?
    The omega has without doubt a more luxury name, but is it better than these sla seikos , personally I don't think so . And I'm so happy I only paid 2.5k for mine nearly new.

  • @JasonTheWatchGuy
    @JasonTheWatchGuy 2 года назад +21

    If you want a bargain budget brand that Seiko isn't anymore, it's now Orient you need to look at. Orient pack so much in for the price.

    • @rtime4269
      @rtime4269 2 года назад +2

      Great quality but their designs are meh. Also their star movements are more expensive also

    • @JD-ww4nl
      @JD-ww4nl 3 месяца назад

      If Seiko kept time well and were dependable, I would think they were a budget brand but they’re absolute junk. 300 m divers watch floods at 40 feet the first time in use. Garbage. Free is too expensive for these pieces of shit!

  • @treasurecoastgypsy
    @treasurecoastgypsy 2 года назад +2

    I think, I would save , for a Master Co axial movement, at this price point, and also enjoy my green King Turtle 🐢,!, great presentation , !

  • @ProfessorPesca
    @ProfessorPesca 2 года назад +14

    I think my problem with the price of these pieces is that you can get a MM300 for about 1500 less than these pieces with the same movement inside. I prefer the look of these pieces but I’m sorry to say I don’t think the price is justified, particularly with no bracelet. Here’s hoping for a non-LE version of these in about 6 months at a more reasonable price point once they’ve gouged the fanboys with these.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  2 года назад

      I'm not sure I've seen the Marine Master 300 in person that I can recall. Do I don't know does it have all the same features like the 904L steel case with Zaratsu polishing? Also, love it or hate it, these new ones have the limited edition tax applied to them.

    • @ProfessorPesca
      @ProfessorPesca 2 года назад +2

      @@JustBlueFish The MM300 is Zarathustra polished to my knowledge, but it’s not this new steel. I think it is the LE tax on this like you say. Shame because I love the way the cool blue one looks.

    • @marcocastagnetti7086
      @marcocastagnetti7086 2 года назад +3

      @@JustBlueFish My sentiments exactly, I bought a MM300 mint condition for $1370 with braclet and rubber strap a few years ago, now your paying 2-3 times that with no bracelet, so what it's limited edition, it doesn't mean anything.

  • @AlexanderB.
    @AlexanderB. 2 года назад +4

    Seiko simply have to get their QC right! As far as I could tell the bezel on the black was a hair misaligned. Last year I returned two SPB143 to the respective dealers until I got a copy with an acceptable alignment.

  • @davelowey3074
    @davelowey3074 2 года назад +2

    Sort of justified especially if the 8L movement is used it's a very nice movement it's a 28.800vph so high beat i think they decorate too with striping and engine turning, but that dosen't make it run better, it's architecture is similar to it's Swiss counterparts but more compact, i would love one i like the way the second hand is done too on the new Seiko's, it looks top shelf. Cheers Guy. P.S. Vintage time Australia (on yt) takes apart a undecorated 8L35A it is an excellent movement.

  • @TheHondarider35924
    @TheHondarider35924 2 года назад +4

    Seiko was my favorite brand. I have zero problem with then making up market. I tent to enjoy there stuff over 750 dollars more anyway I find the LE stuff to be abysmal though. Also they seem to make alot of mistakes. Watches not being offered in black, not making a newer sarb033/035 (even if up market, yes the sarx exist but they're both quite the same), not offering watches with bracelets that should have them, ect. I find there's so many issues that would have basic fixes. I just can't buy anything from the. The marine master is about the only thing I have my sights on but there's about a dozen omega and tudor models I'll be buying first. It feels like seiko has been making everything I would "almost" want and nearly nothing I love. That's a huge contrast to how I felt 3 years ago.

  • @marcelodietrich8674
    @marcelodietrich8674 2 года назад +4

    GORGEOUS watches!
    I'll wait until they release a more non limited & approachable price option.

    • @haping1
      @haping1 2 года назад +3

      You're right. Limmited editions is a way to rise prices. Don't buy them....

  • @frankly5171
    @frankly5171 Год назад +1

    Excellent review of a fantastic watch. The watch is worth every penny.

  • @mountainhobo
    @mountainhobo 2 года назад +9

    I am surprised at some of the skeptical comments. Look at it - the bezel appears to align, and you no longer have to tell your friends "Oh, but hardlex resists impact better than sapphire". That right there is worth at lest $4,000.

  • @daletaylorjr.4786
    @daletaylorjr.4786 2 года назад +1

    A bracelet is a must have for me. It’s too humid in Alabama for straps. But dang, that’s a good looking watch.

  • @harrykuo2573
    @harrykuo2573 Год назад +1

    It is not ceramic bezel. it is the same bezel material they use for GS. Steel with paint over

  • @badgerjeff6081
    @badgerjeff6081 2 года назад +2

    I have a hard time keeping up with Seiko and Omega limited editions. Beautiful piece, but doesn't it already exist?! I need to sharpen my fanboy skills. 😂JK - Your review clearly explains what makes these special. Those bezels and blue face do look great!

  • @e36boy
    @e36boy 2 года назад +1

    Great watches. This is actually the right price.

  • @LTTang
    @LTTang Год назад +3

    As long as they can make quality watches, they can charge a comparable price to their competitors.

  • @tomasinacovell4293
    @tomasinacovell4293 2 года назад

    It's nice as I like the shape of the SKX013's and it looks like that shape, plus it's got really nice hands, perfect.

  • @chia-mingyang5804
    @chia-mingyang5804 2 года назад +2

    No doubt Seiko needs to move upmarket. However their quality control and material upgrade not fully justify the price difference for me. I used to be a Seiko fan and own two very nice watches(Credor Eichi II and GS SBGA001). But I highly doubt I will get another one in the future...

  • @dado380
    @dado380 Год назад +1

    In live this watch looks like it's worth 10 000$.That everbright steel looks just stunning,I am just angry I do not own it yet!!

  • @tar1895
    @tar1895 2 года назад +3

    With no Rolex’s available at retail all brands can now jack up their prices.

  • @ChawnCrawley
    @ChawnCrawley 2 года назад +6

    Above all else, Limited Edition tends to turn me off an entire company. It’s the most pitiful attempt at relevance a watchmaker can do.

  • @garyzimmerman6367
    @garyzimmerman6367 2 года назад +17

    Great video. I realize that Seiko isn’t the brand that it was several years ago. That being said, I think the price on these are just NUTS. This puts them into the range of the Tudor Pelagos and black bays, the omega seamaster pro and the britling superocean. Seiko may have improved greatly over the years but it’s not even close to these and many other brands. The price that Seiko is asking for these watches is way out of line. I think they should be $1500-2000 range at best. Seiko’s problem lately is that think way to highly of their product and think it’s in the same league as the other brands I’ve mentioned.

    • @watchroll3310
      @watchroll3310 2 года назад +4

      So are you paying for the physical product or the brand? If you want to pay for the physical object then Seiko high end prices are kind of normal with the rest of the industry. Seiko was making grand seiko and these high end seikos are no different than a GS. Is just the name.
      Seiko would loose thousands of dollars if they sell their LX line for 1500$ as you say. Those are watches that cost a lot to manufacture.

    • @garyzimmerman6367
      @garyzimmerman6367 2 года назад +6

      @@watchroll3310 I’m sorry but this watch’s price point is just way to high. They’re not in the same league as the other watches I mentioned. And Seiko would not loose money selling this watch at the price range I mentioned. They would just not be making a ridiculous profit. Even the AD’s I’ve spoken to said that Seiko pricing is nuts. They all do hefty discounts to move the product. And these are AD’s that are also discounting Omegas and Britlings. In my opinion, Seiko still has a long way to go before they can charge a MSRP like this for this watch.

    • @gmshadowtraders
      @gmshadowtraders 2 года назад +1

      @@garyzimmerman6367 It's not way too high because these will all sell out. lol another Seiko hater. Go suck up to Lolex and Chewdah.

    • @baldilocks1914
      @baldilocks1914 2 года назад +2

      You’re 100% right! It looks like any other seiko that I can buy at Macy’s for a few 100 dollars. I’d rather spend a few bucks more and grab a nice IWC pilot before spending $4,600 on this watch.

    • @gmshadowtraders
      @gmshadowtraders 2 года назад +6

      @@baldilocks1914 So you'd spend $7k on a watch with a $550 Eta movement?

  • @TinBin-Craig
    @TinBin-Craig 2 года назад +2

    very nice watch i do like ... just to expensive , and another limited edtion watch..... cheers

  • @chi1057
    @chi1057 2 года назад +1

    There's a difference with an understandable price increase and these prices! Where does Seiko end and Grand Seiko start? Not sure this type of pricing is going to distance Seiko from GS 🤔

  • @grantchallinor5263
    @grantchallinor5263 2 года назад +1

    I would buy the Seiko SLA 055/057 over a Tudor Black Bay, Omega diver or Breitling, but not over a Tudor Pelagus.

  • @jazzman5598
    @jazzman5598 2 года назад

    Fine review as I have come to expect. Thanks Guy.

  • @stephannordmann5346
    @stephannordmann5346 11 месяцев назад

    Totally fine the product is worth it 🎉

  • @jamesblonde2271
    @jamesblonde2271 2 года назад +2

    Tudor money😂😂😂😂😂 I like it, im just not giving them that much money.

  • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
    @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 Год назад

    The only question is which one? Black and gilt or blue?

  • @watchroll3310
    @watchroll3310 2 года назад +3

    That's basically a GS with a seiko logo on it. if we are gonna judge seiko for their prices which I think is true then we have to judge Rolex, Patek, AP etc etc which have always been extremely overpriced because of their marketing skills and demand. Seiko is just not a bargain anymore. Prices are more un par with the rest of the industry if you really know how much high quality their high end pieces can be. Finishing alone are better than anything else (omega, rolex etc) Some QC problems are unacceptable on their 1k-2k watches which is where you can find them but no, Seiko's prices are not nuts. It's a brand older than Rolex and they obviously know what they are doing. People buy these things.

    • @stevenvandemsky7290
      @stevenvandemsky7290 2 года назад +1

      No one in Europe buys these things.

    • @AK-jl5xt
      @AK-jl5xt 2 года назад

      @@stevenvandemsky7290 you are wrong there!

    • @milaweitz
      @milaweitz Год назад

      well said

  • @mattys1467
    @mattys1467 2 года назад +2

    Nice watches but the price differential between the main Seiko range and these is too great. Yes the movement is superior, as is the finish of the watch, but not $3000 worth.

  • @Bigaletto
    @Bigaletto 2 года назад +1

    Any seiko over 2k should be a grand seiko.

  • @davelowey3074
    @davelowey3074 2 года назад +1

    Hi Guy, i fogot to say the 8L movements have to be sent to Japan for service which i am not a fan of at all.

  • @ricopuckett8418
    @ricopuckett8418 2 года назад

    Seiko should be priced at $10,000. I hope they do because they deserve it.

  • @ajgross67
    @ajgross67 2 года назад

    The black and gold 057 is really sharp. Thankfully Seiko make sure to keep me from buying it by not offering it with a bracelet and too long lug-to-lug

  • @haping1
    @haping1 2 года назад +2

    I love these watches, but the price is way way too high. It's already been said, but even with these watches looks like the bezel has a missalignement. And an unsigned crown, only 50 hours power reserve, no bracelet.... I love Seiko, but my next more expensive watch will be a COSC certified Longines. Way less money for a lot more watch....

  • @simonwood5587
    @simonwood5587 2 года назад +1

    The part I don’t get…. The X logo. The branding identifies it so it appears as exact clone of the $1000 range ones with the garbage 6R movement….

  • @themightysquid
    @themightysquid 2 года назад

    If you’re going to charge Rolex prices, make them in Rolex sizes. The Sub’s done pretty well at 40mm for quite a while. I got my 39 mm BB58 for $3,750. I won’t spend $4,600 for a wristclock.

    • @mattperry5789
      @mattperry5789 Год назад

      If you have a large wrist, this size is fine

  • @giadar2963
    @giadar2963 2 года назад +1

    My biggest problem whit seiko is that X... In rare some it is 'fine' but still why the fuck they print that everywhere... But that is good for my wallet so maybe it is better this way.. 5 seikos in my box 2 other have been but not forgotten.. Just awesome watches... Hard to have just 1 seiko

  • @albertmeyer8983
    @albertmeyer8983 2 года назад +2

    At this price point it should be a GS. This looks like a “5”. 200 m and a rubber strap is a joke.

  • @ed9564
    @ed9564 2 года назад

    Well made and attractive watches, sorry but just need to find a dealer that negotiates on price more.

  • @mijomendes1705
    @mijomendes1705 11 месяцев назад

    It's interesting that omega wouldn't be expensive for 8,000

  • @tods.9947
    @tods.9947 2 года назад

    Certainly beautiful but I’m looking at gently used GS at this price point instead.

  • @bryanryan4504
    @bryanryan4504 Год назад

    These models exude more quality and better finish than omega seamasters and tudor bbs believe it or not.

  • @stevenvandemsky7290
    @stevenvandemsky7290 2 года назад +2

    Seiko wants to play with the big boys even though their quality control is questionable at best. So their marketing suggested to produce so called limited runs in different colors and raise the prices to increase the perceived value. They might fool the newbie but real watch enthusiasts in Europe and Asia don’t buy their agenda and get the real deal instead as the sales figures prove. Btw the watch is very beautiful, but the price tag is just insane. I would rather get an Omega, Breitling, Tudor or any other Swiss sports watch for that amount of money.

    • @milaweitz
      @milaweitz Год назад

      Some people sold their Tudor Black Bay, this thing is on another level in terms of finishing.

  • @ulmen24
    @ulmen24 2 года назад +3

    What in the F? …I have a hard time believing this feels thousands of dollars different than my MM200

  • @andrew811ful
    @andrew811ful 2 года назад +3

    It still doesn't have a signed seiko crown... lol

    • @brianbellamy5958
      @brianbellamy5958 2 года назад +1

      I have about 40 Seiko dive watches and couldn't tell you with any confidence which ones have signed crowns. It plays zero importance for me when evaluating a watch. It's absolutely a non-factor, lol.

    • @andrew811ful
      @andrew811ful 2 года назад

      @@brianbellamy5958 Haha I get what you mean especially with seiko divers lol

  • @robo2606
    @robo2606 2 года назад +1

    4600 €/£/$ is a bargain, not? ;-)

  • @HHIto
    @HHIto 2 года назад

    Is the SLA line going to merge, morph, stabilize... unlike Rolex, Seiko has too many internal brands (like if I bought the MM200 or the MM300)? The SLX miss the mark of the Western customers (aversion to hockey pucks).

  • @Chinmansilangan
    @Chinmansilangan 2 года назад +1

    I disagree that the current seiko's even the 5's are better than the SKX, price point and over-all value. With that in mind, if you want to find value for money watches go to Orient watches.

  • @amitd5134
    @amitd5134 2 года назад

    So is even the rolexes why is that not questioned

  • @weldmishref
    @weldmishref 2 года назад +1

    Seiko still the bargain brand of watches and still has high end watches. You cant buy a new Land Cruiser with the price of a new Corolla!

  • @Mirke_BG
    @Mirke_BG Год назад

    I like the watch. But for 800 usd and that’s it.
    I would never buy a watch that offers -10 / +15s for any price, let alone for 4.5k USD
    Seiko has a long way to go, in my view.

  • @andrew_owens7680
    @andrew_owens7680 2 года назад +1

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?

  • @weldmishref
    @weldmishref 2 года назад

    It has nothing to do with getting very expensive. If you are used to a Toyota Camry you can't just say Toyota is getting expensive with the Lexus

  • @Trilogysworld
    @Trilogysworld 2 года назад

    Seiko is too notch specially Grand Seiko which I think is better than Rolex

  • @jims4539
    @jims4539 2 года назад +1

    Just watched another video reviewing a Speedmaster at $81,000.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  2 года назад

      Was it at least in precious metals?

    • @jims4539
      @jims4539 2 года назад

      @@JustBlueFish Some kind of special Omega gold.

  • @RA-lh9uh
    @RA-lh9uh 4 месяца назад

    even škoda was a luxury car back in the day but today its a regular car. and lexus is expensive toyota. why could not a seiko be 4600??

  • @DMBVR4
    @DMBVR4 2 года назад +13

    Way too expensive. Also, playing the LE game is getting beyond old. They need to stay in their lane.

    • @JustBlueFish
      @JustBlueFish  2 года назад +2

      The limited edition game is, I'm pretty sure, here to stay for brands like Omega and Seiko/Grand Seiko.

    • @merc7paul
      @merc7paul 8 месяцев назад

      It's seikos turn to go up market, Rolex was a tool watch now they are a luxury brand, none of us need mechanical watches they are all luxury. If you want affordable grab a seiko 5 or a Casio

    • @DMBVR4
      @DMBVR4 8 месяцев назад

      @@merc7paul they are already up market with Grand Seiko. Stop defending their shitty money grabs, it's gross.

  • @derekshearer9049
    @derekshearer9049 2 года назад

    You have to start interacting with your Facebook group a lot more. It's dying....

  • @donnyboon2896
    @donnyboon2896 2 года назад

    Seemingly so.

  • @Leftystrat
    @Leftystrat Год назад

    Shock horror another another anniversary 😅

  • @tantu2395
    @tantu2395 Год назад

    Personally I think the affordable Seiko5 is the signature of Seiko, so why paid more if you can get a more qualified watch for the same money.( Tudor, Longines ..etc)

  • @touchingevil2302
    @touchingevil2302 2 года назад

    YEP! Too expensive :(

  • @keysersoze503
    @keysersoze503 2 года назад

    Like other watchmakers Seiko has found that you can incrementally raise watch prices by introducing new models every year even if the new versions really aren't worth the higher price.
    It is not a revelation that watch geeks will pay way more than a watch is really worth. Just look at Rolex.

  • @___Anakin.Skywalker
    @___Anakin.Skywalker Год назад +1

    $4600 !!!
    😭😭😭
    🤮🤮🤮

  • @steffydog
    @steffydog 2 года назад

    How much, give your head a shake, behave. 560, not 5600, oh behave.

  • @harveyito5463
    @harveyito5463 2 года назад

    Dislike the pointy lugs, deal-killer.

  • @blairdalgleish8247
    @blairdalgleish8247 5 месяцев назад

    Yes not value for money, a Swiss diver at this price is a better watch

  • @JD-ww4nl
    @JD-ww4nl 3 месяца назад

    Seiko divers are absolute junk! I’ve had several of them and nothing problems or my watch surfing and it fogged over the very first time I went diving with my samurai flooded. The watch stops often, is not accurate or dependable! They are good looking, but not worth it! I will never buy another Seiko

  • @jjbuckmaster7059
    @jjbuckmaster7059 2 года назад +2

    So I’m going to be that guy I suppose… This watch is entirely overpriced and anybody that would buy it has money to burn… I got my beautiful white dial Seamaster professional for less than that… It cost 4/5 of what my Rolex explorer cost… I have 15 Seiko‘s on my collection…
    I’ve gone as high as $1800 on one of their watches and I got burned due to poor QC issues… No way… They’re out of there gourd!

    • @brianbellamy5958
      @brianbellamy5958 2 года назад

      It's marketing. No one including Seiko thinks this is going to sell at $4600. The price is to get attention and from all the videos juicing this angle, it's working. When the street price drops, people will think it's a good deal compared to the inflated msrp. It's already down to $3350 on ebay right now.

    • @jjbuckmaster7059
      @jjbuckmaster7059 2 года назад

      @@brianbellamy5958 I’m right there with you on some of their offerings working like that… But this one’s going to sell out at the listed price and is only going to be available at their boutique stores in VRY limited quantities… You’re not gonna see this watch at a low price or discounted…They think they’re omega and they’re not…

    • @brianbellamy5958
      @brianbellamy5958 2 года назад

      @@jjbuckmaster7059 it's on ebay for $3350 right now. I know this because I bought one for $3100 last week, lol.

    • @jjbuckmaster7059
      @jjbuckmaster7059 2 года назад

      @@brianbellamy5958 Well good for you… You pay $1500 too much…

    • @brianbellamy5958
      @brianbellamy5958 2 года назад

      @@jjbuckmaster7059 Well I guess that's a safer response than having some humility and admitting you don't know what you're talking about.

  • @maitrehg
    @maitrehg 4 месяца назад

    Not ceramic.

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders 2 года назад

    Getting? Lol it's been like this for at least 5 years. The SLA017 was the prototype.

  • @giadar2963
    @giadar2963 2 года назад +1

    My biggest problem whit seiko is that X... In rare some it is 'fine' but still why the fuck they print that everywhere... But that is good for my wallet so maybe it is better this way.. 5 seikos in my box 2 other have been but not forgotten.. Just awesome watches... Hard to have just 1 seiko