In my own test, I also noticed better overall coding and design style, and I did notice much lower prices-but not as low as in your examples. I do have a long set of custom rules that I found help enhance the accuracy and precision of the answers. Do you think that’s the reason I'm getting higher costs?
What's happening with the cats on the super maven video. Google APIs cline projects portfolios etc. I added a few comments over there. It looks like the 5th comment didn't go through. I gotta check if I still have it saved. Google didn't let me paste the entire msg so I had to break it up into pieces
are you talking about this comment bro ? i just saw it "you can show how you the new Gemini, Claude, deepseek, 2 more models up and running with API working. (Repetition for learning) Then with the remaining models you can just show the results you got from the one time prompt."
@@Codewello that is the second part. There was a 3rd and 4th part but I only see the 1st and 2nd go through. I know I pasted the huge comment somewhere. If I find it will break it up into 3 parts and send it to you one per 5min
@ on par with gpt4o with my use case. I am using claude, openai, mistral and deepseek api for instruction following they are all the same. My use case is i provide code structure that i implement to llms, then they should follow it. I only use deepseek for exams. I created something like duolingo for my personal consumption but topics depend on what i currently study. Deep seek is good for that use case since you can chain exams into harder scenarios as you progress without worrying about the cost
@ I don’t let the llms generate the code from scratch I feed them the architecture based on my boiler plate. They are inconsistent as of now. Currently llms are good for instruction following
@@Codewello on par with gpt4o with my use case. I am using claude, openai, mistral and deepseek api for instruction following they are all the same. My use case is i provide code structure that i implement to llms, then they should follow it. I only use deepseek for exams. I created something like duolingo for my personal consumption but topics depend on what i currently study. Deep seek is good for that use case since you can chain exams into harder scenarios as you progress without worrying about the cost
Cool topic! As always.
Glad you think so!😁
great content 👍
Thank you 🙌
Prompt Cache makes price much better.
Correct, but it's still 4 times the price of the original model.
In my own test, I also noticed better overall coding and design style, and I did notice much lower prices-but not as low as in your examples.
I do have a long set of custom rules that I found help enhance the accuracy and precision of the answers.
Do you think that’s the reason I'm getting higher costs?
I think you get charged more when you send all of the tokens (code) for edits.
I thought they would LOWER the price 20% or so. Instead they increased the pricing 4x
They think about profit, I'm afraid they will start getting greedy.
What's happening with the cats on the super maven video. Google APIs cline projects portfolios etc. I added a few comments over there. It looks like the 5th comment didn't go through. I gotta check if I still have it saved. Google didn't let me paste the entire msg so I had to break it up into pieces
are you talking about this comment bro ?
i just saw it "you can show how you the new Gemini, Claude, deepseek, 2 more models up and running with API working. (Repetition for learning) Then with the remaining models you can just show the results you got from the one time prompt."
@@Codewello that is the second part. There was a 3rd and 4th part but I only see the 1st and 2nd go through. I know I pasted the huge comment somewhere. If I find it will break it up into 3 parts and send it to you one per 5min
If that is the price I will use mistral large 2 instead
Have you tried Mistral Large 2? Is it any good?
@ on par with gpt4o with my use case. I am using claude, openai, mistral and deepseek api for instruction following they are all the same.
My use case is i provide code structure that i implement to llms, then they should follow it.
I only use deepseek for exams. I created something like duolingo for my personal consumption but topics depend on what i currently study. Deep seek is good for that use case since you can chain exams into harder scenarios as you progress without worrying about the cost
@ I don’t let the llms generate the code from scratch I feed them the architecture based on my boiler plate. They are inconsistent as of now. Currently llms are good for instruction following
@@Codewello on par with gpt4o with my use case. I am using claude, openai, mistral and deepseek api for instruction following they are all the same.
My use case is i provide code structure that i implement to llms, then they should follow it.
I only use deepseek for exams. I created something like duolingo for my personal consumption but topics depend on what i currently study. Deep seek is good for that use case since you can chain exams into harder scenarios as you progress without worrying about the cost
just tell me that you're not an egyptian 😂
I'll be lying, bro. 🤣
In my eyes:
The good: Coding
The bad: Pricing, Wokeness and many more refusals than Sonnet.
What do you mean by "wokeness"? Is it trained on some agenda?
The fun AI experiment predicts the election Results :ruclips.net/video/JObuWC0N5gg/видео.html
But its price is fucked up
Totally agree with you; it's the ugly part of it.