Transformer size and frequency

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @Plan-C
    @Plan-C Месяц назад

    Extremely clear. Thank you. People should teach like this imo. There are no solutions, only trade offs. Cheers

  • @schaltnetzteil495
    @schaltnetzteil495 4 месяца назад +1

    Everything well explained. Thanks!

  • @KAFKUBA
    @KAFKUBA 11 дней назад

    Finally a good explanation. Thank you

  • @turkialshehri9762
    @turkialshehri9762 4 месяца назад +2

    great video.Thank alots .
    We are still waiting the progress of the grid tie inverter project. Have a nice day.😊

  • @raulc.
    @raulc. 4 месяца назад

    Excellent video. Thank you.

  • @gafrers
    @gafrers 4 месяца назад

    Nicely explained as all your videos are

  • @AliShan-se2cf
    @AliShan-se2cf 2 месяца назад

    good carry on,, its very helpful

  • @zoeyzhang9866
    @zoeyzhang9866 3 месяца назад

    Well explained!

  • @alwinsolomon7046
    @alwinsolomon7046 3 месяца назад

    Good explanation... thanks

    • @AKIOTV
      @AKIOTV  3 месяца назад

      @@alwinsolomon7046 thanks for watching 👍

  • @kreynolds1123
    @kreynolds1123 4 месяца назад

    Its really simple. I'll use an analogy. Its like filling a cup, then drinking it. The more times you do this per minute, the more you can drink per minute.
    The transformer iron is like that cup. You can put a certain amount of magnetic energy in aligning magnetic domain in the core of a transformer, and that energy can be drawn out to the prinary each cycle. It's just that simple.
    Iron cores simply make the cup bigger. One does not even need iron, one can even store magnetic energy in the empty space of an air coil.
    The power raiting for a transformer is generally it's continuous power raiting. that factor in the transformers ability to disipate heat from hystoresys losses, eddy current losses, and i²r losses. Its continuous power raiting has nothing to do with saturating the core's magnetic domains. That would be the transformers maximum instanious power, and is limited by core saturation. And thats not even entirely accurate. Becausr, one can add even more magnetizing current beyond the point of saturation. Its just that the core's permibiliy drops and can not add any more magnetizim from aligning magnetic domains.

  • @keerthanaravi6225
    @keerthanaravi6225 4 месяца назад

    I want a solution for this problem statement (Development of non eletrical device for tracking the movement of sun for the movement of solar panels increasing their efficiency . Could you please provide a solution

    • @AKIOTV
      @AKIOTV  4 месяца назад +2

      What do you think this is, chatGPT?

    • @keerthanaravi6225
      @keerthanaravi6225 4 месяца назад

      Noo i dont think like that . Sry

    • @AKIOTV
      @AKIOTV  4 месяца назад +1

      @@keerthanaravi6225 I don't know what the solution you're after is, I have made an electric solar tracker, but you seem to want a purely mechanical "passive" one. Designs exist, but are generally not that practical.
      I've heard of two variants:
      - something based on the sun heating phase-change fluids, creating pressure differences in some sort of hydraulic system to move the panel
      - some mechanical wind-up type thing with a spring, like an old clock
      both of them are not ideal for several reasons. Since electricity is always there (it's a solar panel after all) I'd stick with that.

  • @johnwynne-qx6br
    @johnwynne-qx6br 4 месяца назад

    Thumbs 👍