Emily Chang is amazing, asks all the right questions, doesn't try to make a conclusion on her own, and has a great way of presenting the most uncomfortable questions in a smooth manner
I would beg to disagree. This guy was giving diplomatic answers that really should've been dug deeper so that he could show his true colours. "I believe people as individuals should have control." Bitch, please. Facebook has taken all that control and monetized it. She didn't ask why he said this while the company he works at is promoting the exact opposite. It's ridiculously uninformed and his visions is either of a brainwashed individual or of a demon who knows what's going on but decides his well-being and that of his kids is worthy of the disgusting atrocities Facebook commits.
Wonderful that ethical issues are being strongly considered in the use and development of technology - good question by Emily Chang, sentient response by Andrew Bosworth of Facebook.
Very clever and articulate! But all this increased screen time (VR glasses) all day, can't possibly be great for your eyes. Opthalmology looks like a sector which will significantly benefit...and hearing aids companies.
A vast majority of people haven't even seen a CRT monitor that "we all" ditched decades ago. I feel like most of the tech industry is only focused on catering to a very niche audience whom they refer to as "we all" and are hence focused only on creating low volume products rather than solving issues around manufacturing that lowers the cost of production of devices that already exist. So, I find it extremely hypocritical when they complain about this inequality that exist. If they were employing capitalists instead of elitist socialists (like you see in North Korea now even after the official collapse of Soviet Union), who believe in dividing the society into classes based on what they think that people deserve, you wouldn't be seeing such inequality. I feel that most companies tend to give up on existing business way sooner in favour of creating the next major breakthrough in technology and contrary to popular belief, they're not always successful. Our strategy is to have a firm grip on foundational technologies that give us the flexibility to shift to new technological products when we see it as a viable candidate for mass market adoption.
When a market reaches saturation it doesn't make sense to keep competing in that market. I'll leave you with one sad truth and one positive aspect of business. The sad truth is that most companies don't want to sale to poor customers. On a positive aspect is the story of the Amazon speaker which is a huge success and it was made in the reaction to their failure at attempting a smartphone. A lot of future technology is similar to the Amazon speaker where it works better when it's in more hands and hopefully that will soften the sad truth about business
@@macberry4048 I fucking HATE that amazon speaker. I bought two of them and returned them within an hour. Having to talk to a speaker in my house just filled me with this primal rage. It reminded me too much of dealing with an automated call for a phone bill or something.
I don't think most corporations "believe in dividing people into classes". The more money the consumer has the more stupid shit that they can buy. When was the last time you saw a company market something to homeless people?
@@Logan-Speaking-Facts-Again they won’t do anything till the hardware matures enough as per their standard and they could write a software that can be understood and used by common people, not by techies n geeks only. Have patience! :)
What about the people who have never, arent now, and never will use facebook or any social media, ever. You know, because they have no actual need for it even though they have full lives, lots of friends and relatives, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE. what about them?
“Facebook and controlled environment “ - dude these are contradictory from Facebook‘s business perspective. You might loose your job if you try to do that 😂😂
I really don't like Facebook. It's a waste of time a ghost town, everyone on there wants to be relevant and make you feel left out on purpose so not for me.
I loved vr and ar. But question about negative thing that facebook did. His answer is so vague and unrelated. I have oculus quest 2 and making oculus game. But i do really facebook is the company that put money over customers mental health. Sure, they do good thing too. But it doesnt mean that can cover bad thing they did. I think facebook should admit it and try to adjust their business model so it can cause less harm for teen and mental health. I do love Facebook technologies but none with their business model
We need to reform the security around the internet. We need to have more contact as humans we never truthfully able to know who's on the other end. I would like to think that Google is protecting me Maybe that's their intention and I believe it is their intention because they offer so many amazing educational experiences for me to learn. Why don't you create a security system that can graduate people into the system instead of just letting them loose on sensitive information that shouldn't be obtained.kids should be taught this as well as being taught about finance technology and finances the entire world and then there's the other people.
I can’t wait for AR glasses to be the norm. I’d expect companies like Apple, Google, and Samsung to take that market rather than Facebook or Amazon but there’s no telling.
On one hand, we might as well hand over our world to robots: no social interaction in a couple of generations. Stick an IV in me and feed my like that! Kids? That's happening less already only about to accelerate. Sad world he's mapping out.
Emily is way too soft to conduct a real relevant interview like this, not the correct journalist for this task. There are real concerns with the impact of FB to society. This fella is getting away with his obvious bias in this interview. Disappointing.
This man is an absolute nightmare to listen to because of how good he is at deflecting and hiding the really controversial parts of the discussion. The reporter went along with it instead of doubling down on topics of contingency, which is a shame but understandable given the time she had available. Remember to be critical of everything he said, as it was mostly diplomatic answers that hide what's really happening in the company with this veil of "I'm just trying to be good" bs.
@@manp1039 For example, when she asks whether Facebook's development has done any harm, he simply says that there will always be stuff unaccounted for. Well, unaccounted for is not the same as deliberately ignored for profit, which is the strategy Facebook has been using in many aspects of privacy and security of its users. However, he mentions none of this and just deflects the question without touching the controversial points. Only if you're informed on their bs do you realize their PR strategy and narrative.
@@poweredman Ok. thanks for explaining that. My interest in this story is about developments in VR tach. Do you have a VR headset? which one(s) do you have?
I bet any money he would fail a drug test. He is full of it. Actions speak louder than words. Just take a good look at Facebook past actions. The Company has not changed. They are just more clever at hiding their wrongdoing.
Emily Chang is amazing, asks all the right questions, doesn't try to make a conclusion on her own, and has a great way of presenting the most uncomfortable questions in a smooth manner
I would beg to disagree. This guy was giving diplomatic answers that really should've been dug deeper so that he could show his true colours. "I believe people as individuals should have control." Bitch, please. Facebook has taken all that control and monetized it. She didn't ask why he said this while the company he works at is promoting the exact opposite. It's ridiculously uninformed and his visions is either of a brainwashed individual or of a demon who knows what's going on but decides his well-being and that of his kids is worthy of the disgusting atrocities Facebook commits.
Emily go to bed
I agree she asks the right cringeworthy questions. I’d wish she would follow up though to dig deeper instead of moving on to the next topic
@@Southsidelion514 exactly my thoughts.
Hopefully we won't have Facebook in 15 years
Likely will have some decentralized social media become popular and take market share from Facebook
@@ChaceBonanno #CancelFacebook2021
Wonderful that ethical issues are being strongly considered in the use and development of technology - good question by Emily Chang, sentient response by Andrew Bosworth of Facebook.
They're not. The only thing they consider is how they can manipulate to take total control of your mind and your life.
I like her. She pushes ppl no matter how big they are
Lol yeah okay. If that was true she wouldn't have a job.
Very clever and articulate! But all this increased screen time (VR glasses) all day, can't possibly be great for your eyes. Opthalmology looks like a sector which will significantly benefit...and hearing aids companies.
He's talking about the singularity
Mark of the beast impending. Get your soul right with Jesus Christ before it goes down.
Only if CNBC had reporters like this?
she is so biased it's insane. she would never ask Apple these questions, which is a way bigger offender of privacy and data concerns
A vast majority of people haven't even seen a CRT monitor that "we all" ditched decades ago. I feel like most of the tech industry is only focused on catering to a very niche audience whom they refer to as "we all" and are hence focused only on creating low volume products rather than solving issues around manufacturing that lowers the cost of production of devices that already exist. So, I find it extremely hypocritical when they complain about this inequality that exist. If they were employing capitalists instead of elitist socialists (like you see in North Korea now even after the official collapse of Soviet Union), who believe in dividing the society into classes based on what they think that people deserve, you wouldn't be seeing such inequality. I feel that most companies tend to give up on existing business way sooner in favour of creating the next major breakthrough in technology and contrary to popular belief, they're not always successful. Our strategy is to have a firm grip on foundational technologies that give us the flexibility to shift to new technological products when we see it as a viable candidate for mass market adoption.
When a market reaches saturation it doesn't make sense to keep competing in that market. I'll leave you with one sad truth and one positive aspect of business. The sad truth is that most companies don't want to sale to poor customers. On a positive aspect is the story of the Amazon speaker which is a huge success and it was made in the reaction to their failure at attempting a smartphone. A lot of future technology is similar to the Amazon speaker where it works better when it's in more hands and hopefully that will soften the sad truth about business
@@macberry4048 I fucking HATE that amazon speaker. I bought two of them and returned them within an hour. Having to talk to a speaker in my house just filled me with this primal rage. It reminded me too much of dealing with an automated call for a phone bill or something.
I don't think most corporations "believe in dividing people into classes". The more money the consumer has the more stupid shit that they can buy. When was the last time you saw a company market something to homeless people?
apple execs, internally, have been saying this for years lmaoo
What has apple done to make virtual worlds though?
@@Logan-Speaking-Facts-Again they won’t do anything till the hardware matures enough as per their standard and they could write a software that can be understood and used by common people, not by techies n geeks only.
Have patience! :)
This guy seemed really smart.
What about the people who have never, arent now, and never will use facebook or any social media, ever. You know, because they have no actual need for it even though they have full lives, lots of friends and relatives, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE. what about them?
“Facebook and controlled environment “ - dude these are contradictory from Facebook‘s business perspective. You might loose your job if you try to do that 😂😂
Professional reporting...🍻
I really don't like Facebook. It's a waste of time a ghost town, everyone on there wants to be relevant and make you feel left out on purpose so not for me.
Fire... it’s dangerous, but can also save lives. It’s how it’s used not what it is that matters.
I loved vr and ar. But question about negative thing that facebook did. His answer is so vague and unrelated. I have oculus quest 2 and making oculus game. But i do really facebook is the company that put money over customers mental health. Sure, they do good thing too. But it doesnt mean that can cover bad thing they did. I think facebook should admit it and try to adjust their business model so it can cause less harm for teen and mental health. I do love Facebook technologies but none with their business model
The "Cerebrum Communicator" (CC) [from a 1967 movie]. Makes phone calls using an implanted chip in your brain.
Musk is trying to do this with neural ink. Facebook is trying to do this without chips
We need to reform the security around the internet. We need to have more contact as humans we never truthfully able to know who's on the other end. I would like to think that Google is protecting me Maybe that's their intention and I believe it is their intention because they offer so many amazing educational experiences for me to learn. Why don't you create a security system that can graduate people into the system instead of just letting them loose on sensitive information that shouldn't be obtained.kids should be taught this as well as being taught about finance technology and finances the entire world and then there's the other people.
I can’t wait for AR glasses to be the norm. I’d expect companies like Apple, Google, and Samsung to take that market rather than Facebook or Amazon but there’s no telling.
Disliked for the clickbait title. Was only briefly addressed at the end. Otherwise great guest.
good interview
This is why Apple goes to war with Facebook
Reading from lawyer notes?
Much better to face to face on me in to bringing of those documents files information because I will bringing of mines!
The last question was profound
On one hand, we might as well hand over our world to robots: no social interaction in a couple of generations. Stick an IV in me and feed my like that! Kids? That's happening less already only about to accelerate. Sad world he's mapping out.
"I've never seen someone go homeless for looking for a fix from their phone". What a douhce bag...like he doesn't know.
Silicon valley huckster
lol FACE TO FACETIME THATS THE REAL CONNECTION prrrp
Emily is way too soft to conduct a real relevant interview like this, not the correct journalist for this task. There are real concerns with the impact of FB to society. This fella is getting away with his obvious bias in this interview. Disappointing.
Do you not have a phone?
This man is an absolute nightmare to listen to because of how good he is at deflecting and hiding the really controversial parts of the discussion. The reporter went along with it instead of doubling down on topics of contingency, which is a shame but understandable given the time she had available. Remember to be critical of everything he said, as it was mostly diplomatic answers that hide what's really happening in the company with this veil of "I'm just trying to be good" bs.
what are the controversial part of the discussion?
I think he answered most of questions. Which part is the controversial part?
@@manp1039 For example, when she asks whether Facebook's development has done any harm, he simply says that there will always be stuff unaccounted for. Well, unaccounted for is not the same as deliberately ignored for profit, which is the strategy Facebook has been using in many aspects of privacy and security of its users. However, he mentions none of this and just deflects the question without touching the controversial points. Only if you're informed on their bs do you realize their PR strategy and narrative.
@@poweredman Ok. thanks for explaining that. My interest in this story is about developments in VR tach. Do you have a VR headset? which one(s) do you have?
@@manp1039 he doesn't actually discuss that in detail either, it's ever more vague than the other answers...
Well.... interviewer looks so fool to me...
I want neuralink instead of fb. 😂
put those chip into your head lol scary
Please help me
Someone who is clearly in denial about Facebook or maybe just brainwashed
or maybe its because facebook pay his salary and he doesnt want to get fired.
How Facebook addresses teenage depression? "We have to teach kids emotional control sooner" - launches Instagram for -13 yr olds. Well played.
How different the world would be if people like this guy used his intelligence for good?
Tesla tried. He just got taken advantage of and used. So none.
Used his intelligence for good like what? Plant trees and bake beans for homeless people?
@@danielm5161 nah man. Some organic feed reach for SMB's would be a start.
this dude is working on the future of VR and all this reporter asks about is ethics ?
ffs get some real technology people to host these things
Decentralized platforms will make Facebook obsolete
That isn't happening
Once a cheater always a cheater, and they have done this many times over. All these excuses bs interview
I bet any money he would fail a drug test. He is full of it. Actions speak louder than words. Just take a good look at Facebook past actions. The Company has not changed. They are just more clever at hiding their wrongdoing.